Village Council Public Work Session Minutes 20140205
A REGULAR WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGEOF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR., COURTROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2014 AT 7:30 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE – MOMENT OF SILENCE
Councilman Pucciarelli called the meeting to order at 7:32 P.M., and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call, the following were present: Councilmembers Hauck, Pucciarelli, Riche, and Walsh. Also present were Heather Mailander, Acting Village Manager/Village Clerk; and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney.
Councilman Pucciarelli led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and asked for a moment of silence in honor of the American men and women serving in our Armed Forces, as well as those serving as first responders. Prior to the moment of silence, Councilman Pucciarelli asked Councilwoman Hauck to say a few words about a Village employee who passed away this past week. Last Saturday, José da Silva, a crossing guard in Ridgewood for the last 10 years, passed away. His service to the community was recognized, and all of the Councilmembers conveyed their condolences to his family, who are also members of the Ridgewood community. Mr. da Silva is survived by his wife, Elizabeth da Silva; his daughter, Janet Balboa, who is also a crossing guard in the Village; and his grandson, Anthony. Mr. da Silva worked at the corner of Pleasant Avenue and Spring Avenue. A moment of silence followed.
2. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Councilman Pucciarelli asked if anyone from the public wished to speak regarding any of the agenda items.
Frank Delvecchio, 65 Walthery Avenue, stated that he was upset at the last Village Council meeting, due to the inaction of the Councilmembers. However, after giving the issue more thought and doing some research into the matter, Mr. Delvecchio said he found some interesting facts that should be acknowledged and answered by the Councilmembers, as well as by Police Chief John Ward and the Acting Village Manager.
Mr. Delvecchio found it interesting that in March 2013, the Village hired two candidates for the Police Department. One of those candidates is the same person who was given a promise of employment on January 17, 2014. The reason he did not complete the course at the Police Academy is irrelevant, but the fact remains that he was hired by the Village in March 2013, along with another candidate who recently completed the Police Academy. Both of those candidates are related to other officers in the Police Department. Furthermore, the candidate who was selected and hired in March 2013 was chosen from the Civil Service list, and Mr. Delvecchio questions why the issue of nepotism was not brought up at that time, due to the fact that this candidate is related to a police officer. Mr. Delvecchio also discovered that with the hirings in March 2013, the Village exceeded the number of patrol officers allowed under the existing ordinance, the same ordinance that was discussed at the previous Village Council meeting, but not amended. Mr. Delvecchio asked why this was not an issue in March 2013, but became an issue only recently, just before these two young men were due to start at the Police Academy. In addition, he asked why comments were made at the previous meeting challenging the integrity of Police Chief John Ward and the Acting Village Manager, implying that they somehow manipulated the Civil Service list that has now, according to several media sources, led to a possible investigation at the request of Chief Ward by the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office.
Mr. Delvecchio understands the position stated by Chief Ward, and his desire to follow the Attorney General’s guidelines when an accusation is made. In some way, Chief Ward felt that he had no choice, and he wanted transparency to show that proper procedure was followed in the directions he was given by the Councilmembers and the Acting Village Manager. Mr. Delvecchio does not understand how Chief Ward could be culpable when he did not vote to pass, or even have a say in, the ill-advised ordinance in question, but only follows directions given to him by the Councilmembers. It seems to Mr. Delvecchio that the Councilmembers have more culpability than Chief Ward in this situation.
Mr. Delvecchio discovered that the two candidates in question did not start their courses at the Police Academy, but instead were given letters rescinding the offers of employment, and they may have to start the process again under a new Village Manager. One of the candidates had given notice to his employer and left his previous job in order to take the position with the Ridgewood Police Department, and is currently unemployed. Mr. Delvecchio considers that to be extremely unfair. He pointed out that the two young men in question have lived in Ridgewood all their lives; attended Ridgewood public schools; got high scores on the Civil Service test; underwent complete background checks, physicals, and psychological evaluations; had their heads shaved; and got fitted for uniforms and equipment necessary for the Police Academy, but they are now being denied the positions offered to them. As Mr. Delvecchio sees it, this is all due to the fact that the Councilmembers refused to amend an ordinance to right a wrong. The candidates are the victims in this process.
In closing, Mr. Delvecchio said he hoped the Councilmembers would make the right decision at this meeting, which would be to amend the ordinance to make it open-ended as far as the number of patrol officers is concerned, and extend the job offers to the two candidates who have completed all requirements expected of them. Mistakes are sometimes made, but Mr. Delvecchio said the right thing to do is to admit them and move on. No one expects perfection.
James Bombace, 686 Midwood Road, added some comments with respect to the proposal to hire officers for the Police Department. Mr. Bombace said he could speak with some authority, having gone through this process a number of times when he served as Chief of the Ridgewood Fire Department. Unfortunately, the victims in this scenario are the two candidates who were given a promise of employment, and Mr. Bombace believes the Village should follow through on that promise. Any mistakes made were not made by the two candidates. Mr. Bombace is very familiar with the ordinance regarding the Police Department, because while he was Fire Chief, he attempted to have the ordinance about the Fire Department mirror the Police Department ordinance. He feels that the two individuals are being punished for an error that occurred somewhere else, and it is important for the Councilmembers to take whatever steps are necessary to make sure that these candidates receive that employment, and correct the problem, whether retroactively or in the future. It is not necessary to place blame on anyone, but the problem needs to be addressed and corrected.
Tom Landers, 413 Meadowbrook Avenue, said after the previous Village Council meeting, residents could draw their own conclusions as to why two Police Department candidates were given offers of employment in violation of Ordinance 3142. However, this does not change the fact the two young men have been disappointed, and that public safety in the Village would be enhanced if they were hired. If the Councilmembers are inclined to amend the ordinance, Mr. Landers believes it should be amended for the benefit of the community. An example of such a benefit was laid out by Mr. Landers. For the past 15 years or more, the Police Department has staffed a position called School Resource Officer (SRO). The officer acts as a liaison between the Police Department and the Village public school system. The SRO’s mission is to enhance school security; facilitate the handling of juvenile complaints; enhance the working relationship between educators and law enforcement officials; and most importantly, interact with children in a positive, constructive way. With all the news regarding school violence, bullying, and drug use among our youth, there is a critical need to have more trained SROs in our schools. If the Councilmembers, the Police Chief, and the Superintendent of Schools are willing to discuss this idea and to commit additional staffing to the SRO program, Mr. Landers believes it would be a justified and well-received reason to amend Ordinance 3142 and welcome the immediate hiring of two police candidates. Councilman Pucciarelli noted that this item is on the agenda for this evening, and the suggestions made could be factored into the discussion at that time.
Bill Bartlett, Queens Court, said he was appalled when he read in the newspaper last week about decisions that were not made by the Councilmembers, which he believes are matters requiring common sense. It seems obvious to Mr. Bartlett that if seven officers are retiring within the next year, something must be done to plan ahead, instead of waiting until they actually retire to take action. Chief Ward planned to provide for that coverage, and Mr. Bartlett does not believe he should have been overruled in his planning. Mr. Bartlett believes the Village has an obligation to the two candidates to follow through on the commitment that was made to them. In addition, Mr. Bartlett thinks there is an obligation to Chief Ward to support him, as well as the Acting Village Manager. He believes the decisions made by Chief Ward and Ms. Mailander were properly made, although he states that there could have been some technicalities that were overlooked, but that could have been remedied by the Councilmembers by simply making any action taken retroactive. That is what Mr. Bartlett believes should be done now, although it is possible that damages have already been incurred by the two candidates in question.
Regarding nepotism, Mr. Bartlett believes it was foolish to raise that issue. One of the candidates is the son of a former Chief in the Village, which Mr. Bartlett thinks could be a huge benefit. The candidate was raised in Ridgewood, and his family has ties to the community, which makes them an ideal candidate based on his thorough knowledge of the Village, as well as many of the residents.
Mr. Bartlett reminded the Councilmembers that they were elected to do what is right and sensible for the Village as a whole. He asked them to stop bickering and move forward with this issue to get the two candidates hired while they are available, and move on to more important issues facing Ridgewood.
Christine Provenzano, 319 Willow Court, said this topic is personal to her, because her daughter has been a police officer in another municipality for more than five years. Her daughter went through this same process to become a police officer, so Ms. Provenzano is aware of how rigorous the process is. She noted that Ms. Mailander stated in the previous meeting that the daily savings in overtime, which has been an issue for Ridgewood, would be $1,000-$1,200. That is quite a bit of money, and Ms. Mailander extrapolated that savings to show what the savings would be for one year. That also reflects a savings based on hiring only two police officers, not four, as had been previously discussed. Chief Ward stated that he is currently using his detectives and sergeants, instead of patrolmen, for certain duties, which is part of the reason for the high overtime costs. Moreover, after watching the previous Village Council meeting, Ms. Provenzano found it extremely disturbing to watch Mayor Aronsohn and Councilman Pucciarelli make accusations of nepotism within the hiring process, when it was never brought up in previous situations. She agreed with Mr. Bartlett that the Councilmembers need to stop bickering. As Chief Ward explained to the Councilmembers, the Ridgewood Police Department uses the Civil Service exam for its hiring process, which requires someone to get a very high score in order to be on the eligibility list. After that, a series of interviews is conducted. Once an offer is made to someone on the list, a conditional employment letter is sent to the candidate, which the two candidates in question received from the Village. Only after the conditional employment offer is made can the candidates go through the necessary medical and psychological evaluations, which two candidates in question also passed. They were due to start at the Police Academy on January 30, 2014. One of the candidates gave his previous employer notice after receiving the conditional offer of employment from the Village. He now has no medical coverage, no employment, no income, and Ms. Provenzano believes the Village is now at risk of a labor lawsuit due to this situation. These candidates have no way of knowing if they will be on the next eligibility list. Furthermore, it will cost the Village approximately $1,500 per candidate to send each of them to the Essex County Police Academy, an addition to the costs associated with changing their uniforms and whatever other equipment change might be necessary. Those costs are borne by Ridgewood residents.
In closing, Ms. Provenzano noted that Councilwoman Hauck stated that this is an administrative and Village Council problem, not the candidates’ problem. She urged the Councilmembers to make it right.
Ron Verdicchio, 391 Colonial Road, said he was appalled after watching the tape of the previous Village Council meeting at the way in which public officials conducted themselves, questioning the Police Chief as if they were conducting a Congressional investigation in Ridgewood. Mr. Verdicchio supports Chief Ward, and believes Chief Ward did the right thing from a taxpayer’s and layman’s point of view by anticipating retirements. That is what a good Human Resources planner would do. Chief Ward assessed where people were on the Civil Service list; he made offers of employment within the framework of the procedure set out by the Village; and he did the right thing by doing all of that. Mr. Verdicchio does not believe that Chief Ward should have been questioned the way he was last week. Mr. Verdicchio also believes the Councilmembers should support Chief Ward.
Second, Mr. Verdicchio believes that a promise of employment is a promise. At the risk of sounding redundant, Mr. Verdicchio echoed what previous speakers said about when promises of employment are made, the Village must follow through with such promises.
Next, Mr. Verdicchio pointed out that the Councilmembers need a “human relations” check. This was the third or fourth time that Mr. Verdicchio came to the podium with questions about how the Councilmembers seem to be “going after” people, and he said that must end. Attention must be paid to crumbled sidewalks, curbs, empty stores, unpaved roads, potholes, and other such problems, but first, Mr. Verdicchio said this “human relations” flaw, in which the Councilmembers seem to “go after” people who disagree with them, must be addressed. Mr. Verdicchio stated that it was very unfortunate that Mayor Aronsohn was not present during these comments, because in his view, Mayor Aronsohn was the one who “went after” Chief Ward inappropriately.
Janet Golfo, 247 Walthery Avenue, said she has lived in Ridgewood for 26 years, and has never felt the need to make public comments before this time. However, she was also appalled at the events of the previous Village Council meeting, and Ms. Golfo agrees with everything previous speakers said. Ms. Golfo explained that she comes from a military family and one with many civil servants, many of whom are New York City police officers and detectives. Her father is a retired New York City fireman. Ms. Golfo said it is a special environment in which to grow up, and she thinks that is why these candidates wanted to join the Ridgewood Police Department. Ms. Golfo believes they would be a great asset to the Police Department. In addition, Ms. Golfo said she is also disappointed because the Councilmembers would continue to discuss this in Closed Session.
There were no other comments from the public at this time, and Councilman Pucciarelli closed the time for public comment.
3. PRESENTATIONS
a. Girl Scout Gold Award – “Crosswalk Safety Is a Two Way Street; Walk Safely, Drive Safely”
Councilman Pucciarelli said this was a remarkable suggestion from a Girl Scout, who is the recipient of the Girl Scout Gold Award for this project. Her name is Amelia Maas, at 132 Clairmont Road. Ms. Maas is 17 years old, and she is with Girl Scout Troop 1380. She explained that girls who remain with Girl Scouts for as long as she has are given unique opportunities to complete projects with the sole purpose of bettering their communities. The Girl Scouts are allowed to select their own projects based on what they believe are the most important ways to better their communities, and Ms. Maas said her choice was very clear, because she believes that pedestrian safety in the Village is imperative.
Ms. Maas continued by saying that pedestrian visibility, or the lack thereof, contributes to more than 60% of accidents in crosswalks. When drivers are unable to see the obstacles in their way, collisions are unavoidable. The idea that Ms. Maas found would have the most impact is the use of crossing flags. They are lightweight, florescent, eye-catching flags that were first implemented in Salt Lake City, Utah, where they have been responsible for a nearly 30% drop in pedestrian accidents. The flags are placed in canisters at both sides of selected crosswalks, and are picked up and dropped off when people cross streets. They are intended to be held above a pedestrian’s head in order to gain the most visibility possible. It makes it easier for drivers to spot people crossing in the crosswalks, and they can drive around the pedestrians accordingly. Ms. Maas and her troop leader believe that the crosswalks that would most benefit from the installation of these flags are at Franklin Avenue and Walnut Avenue; Franklin Avenue and Chestnut Avenue; and Ridgewood Avenue and Broad Street. The canisters would be mounted onto poles in those areas, and the installment of one channel post would be required at the intersection of Franklin Avenue and Walnut Avenue. The flags themselves are inexpensive, costing approximately $2 each, and Ms. Maas plans to meet with both the A.M. and P.M. Rotary Clubs to ask for their financial support in order to purchase and subsequently assemble each flag.
Ms. Maas pointed out that there have been numerous crashes in the streets of Ridgewood, some of which have affected her personally, while others have injured many others around her. She strongly believes that these crosswalk flags have the ability to save lives, and hopes that the Councilmembers will approve the project.
Councilman Pucciarelli commended Ms. Maas for her wonderful suggestion.
Councilwoman Hauck asked if Ms. Maas had considered the intersection at Franklin Avenue and Broad Street. Ms. Maas responded that she did, but that would require the installation of three channel posts, which might be too many poles in that area. Councilwoman Hauck pointed out that it is a long crosswalk.
Councilman Riche noted that this idea had been raised before, but no action had been taken, so he thanked Ms. Maas for bringing it back to the forefront. He also suggested that she might consider the intersection of Oak Street and Ridgewood Avenue, which is another difficult intersection. Councilman Riche also thought there could be a possibility that the Village Council could find some funds to contribute to the effort if that intersection were added at a later date. He thanked Ms. Maas again for her idea and her efforts, and congratulated her for her Gold Award.
Councilwoman Walsh stated that Ms. Maas had attended several meetings of the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee, and Councilwoman Walsh had been speaking indirectly about Ms. Maas at a previous Village Council meeting. Everyone in the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee is happy that Ms. Maas is starting this project, and they have noted that they are relying on a Girl Scout to help with citizens’ safety. Councilman Walsh wished Ms. Maas the best of luck, and she thinks it will be wonderful for Ridgewood.
Police Chief John Ward said he is very proud of Ms. Maas, because sometimes people choose projects that are beautification projects, but her project can actually save lives. That shows leadership, which is important. Chief Ward said there may have been an issue with liability on the part of the Village, and asked Mr. Rogers to check with Salt Lake City and the town of New Paltz, New York, to see how they handled such issues.
- 4. DISCUSSIONa. Budget:
1.) Graydon Pool Membership Fees & Tennis Badge Fees – Parks & Recreation
Ms. Mailander reminded the Councilmembers that they had approved two-year fees last year for 2013 and 2014, and this particular fee is a new membership fee for a resident disabled patron in the amount of $30, which matches the amount charged for senior citizen memberships. This would allow Village residents who have disabilities to come to Graydon Pool at a reduced rate. Councilman Riche asked how a “resident disabled patron” is defined. Ms. Mailander responded that a definition will have to be added to the ordinance, as well as a requirement that some proof of disability be provided, which Mr. Rogers can suggest. Councilman Riche said he was trying to understand the intent of the ordinance, because the word “disabled” can be far-reaching, and what would the Village be trying to achieve by charging a reduced fee for certain people. He suspects that it has to do with people who have mobility issues, but that needs to be clarified. Ms. Mailander said it would be clarified in the ordinance. Councilwoman Hauck stated that this was discussed at a meeting of the Parks, Recreation, and Conservation Board, and the members of the Board spent a lot of time pondering those issues, which raised many questions. However, they were addressed, and Ms. Mailander would get that information. Councilman Pucciarelli pointed out that while no one wants to discriminate against people with disabilities, it is also necessary to make sure that such an ordinance does not favor them to any extent not allowed by law. Mr. Rogers said he would like to hear from Timothy Cronin, Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation, and Nancy Bigos, Deputy Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation, regarding their criteria and what their intent is with this type of ordinance, so that information could be explained in the preamble to the ordinance, and the ordinance could be directed toward the goal they seek. Councilwoman Hauck said that there must be some type of discussion, because the issue was raised as to whether these patrons would be coming with aides, and whether the aides would have to pay the full daily rates, or could be admitted for free because they would be required for assistance. Ms. Mailander said that the ordinance would be brought back to Mr. Cronin and Ms. Bigos to get further information.
2.) Day Camp Fees – Parks & Recreation
Ms. Mailander explained that in the past, non-residents have been allowed to attend the day camp. However, the day camp has become so popular that it is now over-subscribed, and it has a waiting list. This ordinance will eliminate the non-resident fee, and non-residents will no longer be allowed to attend the day camp. There will be no change in the resident fee for day camp for 2014. The fee is currently $525 for Village residents. Councilman Pucciarelli asked what is meant by the portion that reads “from $700 to…” Ms. Mailander responded that there will no longer be a non-resident fee, so there will be no choice available, and there will be no range in prices. That information will be removed from the ordinance. Councilwoman Walsh asked if the day camp is not full, would the registrations be closed in that case. Ms. Mailander confirmed that there would be no opportunity for non-residents to send their children to the day camp. Councilman Riche asked if there is any conflict in prohibiting a non-resident from sending his/her children to the Village day camp, and allowing non-residents to come to Graydon Pool during the month of August. Ms. Mailander said she does not believe so, because that pertains specifically to Graydon Pool, and this is specifically targeted to the day camp. This will be put on the agenda for the February 19, 2014, Public Meeting.
3.) Bid Approval for Maple Park Turf Cleaning – Parks & Recreation
Ms. Mailander stated that this was a rebid. A low bid was received, but upon review and discussion with the company, it was determined that the company did not own the equipment needed for the cleaning, which they would purchase if they were awarded the bid; they had little experience doing this type of cleaning, with only one prior comparable job; and no employees were certified, as required in the bid specifications. The second-lowest bid was received from The LandTek Group, Inc., which was the outfit that originally installed the synthetic turf at Maple Park East. They also own the required equipment, and have 20 years’ experience. In addition, their staff is certified. Therefore, Mr. Cronin recommends that the bid be awarded to the second-lowest bidder, because they meet all the criteria in the bid specifications. As a reminder, Ms. Mailander said this is a 50/50 grant through the Bergen County Open Space Trust Fund, which means that the Village’s portion will be $20,790, with a matching amount funded through the grant. Councilman Riche said he asked that this be sent out for rebid, and he asked what the amount of the previous bid from LandTek was. Ms. Mailander said she would have to get that information, because she did not have it with her. Councilman Pucciarelli asked if this is an annual cleaning, and Ms. Mailander responded that this work relates to Hurricane Sandy, which caused damage to the field. Councilwoman Walsh recalled that this was mentioned during the budget process last year, and it was suggested that this should perhaps be an operating expense instead of a capital expense, because of the amount of work involved that indicates this could be a recurring maintenance item. Councilwoman Hauck pointed out that it would most likely not be an annually recurring event. This will be put on the agenda for the February 19, 2014, Public Meeting.
4.) Shared Services Agreement – Municipal Court Administrator & Deputy Municipal Court Administrator – Glen Rock
Ms. Mailander explained that the Borough of Glen Rock approached the Village to have a Shared Services Agreement for the Ridgewood Municipal Court Administrator to also serve as the Municipal Court Administrator for Glen Rock. In return, Ridgewood would get the services of the Glen Rock Deputy Court Administrator, to serve when the Municipal Court Administrator goes on vacation or is absent for an extended period of time. The agreement allows the Village to be paid $10,000 for the services of the Municipal Court Administrator, and the services of the Deputy Court Administrator. Ridgewood currently does not have a Deputy Court Administrator. Ms. Mailander noted that the Village is always looking for Shared Services whenever possible in order to save money and bring revenue to the Village. Councilman Riche asked if this is currently being done. Ms. Mailander responded that the Municipal Court Administrator currently does do work for Glen Rock, but there is no Shared Services Agreement, so there is no payment for her services. Ridgewood will still maintain its own courts and judges, and a lot of the work can be done in Ridgewood. Councilman Riche said he assumes this has been researched to ensure that it is financially beneficial to the Village, which Ms. Mailander confirmed. This will be put on the agenda for the February 19, 2014, Public Meeting.
5.) Award of Contract – Printing for Municipal Election
Ms. Mailander stated that this year, there is a Municipal Election in May, which means that the Village must pay for all of the election printing expenses. Two quotes have been obtained. One is from Printing Craftsmen, Inc., of Fairview, in the approximate amount of $16,000. The other was from Royal Printing of West New York, New Jersey, in the amount of $17,640. Ms. Mailander recommends that the bid be awarded to Printing Craftsmen, Inc. They have done work for the Village in the past, and they know what is required. The fee also includes all of the necessary translations, as well as all of the other required printing elements. This will be put on the agenda for the February 19, 2014, Public Meeting.
- b. Operations:
1.) Removed from Agenda
Although this has been postponed until February 26, 2014, Mr. Rogers has been in touch with Tom Wells, the attorney representing the Bolger Foundation, the proposed contractor who intends to donate its services for the proposed renovation. Realizing that there is a need to get all this done before the day camp begins, Mr. Rogers said he intends to have all the necessary work done, and the contracts signed, so that all of the information can be given to the Councilmembers prior to the February 26th Work Session Meeting. Councilman Pucciarelli added that the Historic Preservation Commission held a hearing on the subject, but he has not yet seen their report.
Councilman Pucciarelli also thanked all of the Village employees who have been getting up and out early in the morning to do the necessary snow removal work.
- c. Policy:
1.) Removed from Agenda
2.) Amend Section 3-43(D) of the Ridgewood Village Code – Administration of Government – Police Department
Councilman Pucciarelli said he had the opportunity to ask some questions of Chief Ward, and he thanked Chief Ward for his complete responses to those questions. However, he wanted to resolve one remaining ambiguity: Chief Ward stated that it requires nine months for a new hire to actually “count” as a police officer. There was another reference to nine months later on in Chief Ward’s response, and it was not clear to Councilman Pucciarelli he was referring to the same nine-month period, or if it was referring to an additional nine months. Chief Ward responded that from the time a candidate goes into the Police Academy, the Academy process takes approximately six months. In addition, the Village has a three-month field training program, which allows the officers to become acclimated to application of the theories learned in the Academy. That allows them to be considered able to go on patrol alone. There is more acclimation taking place after the three-month time period, but a minimum standard has already been met by that time. The other part of his response was to try to explain why it is necessary to hire police officers ahead of time, due to the anticipated loss of senior officers who are handling many non-emergency but critical functions within the Police Department. Chief Ward pointed out that he needs to be able to put someone in the training cycle, because it is not something that can be learned overnight. The functions being performed a very tedious, yet detail-oriented, such as Internal Affairs issues and the evidence and subpoena processes, which take time to master. Another one of those areas is alcohol and beverage control. Efforts are being made in cross-training people, but due to the current staff limitations, that is not always possible due to the fact that many detectives and the traffic officer are being used to cover patrol in order to keep overtime costs down. Chief Ward also hoped to offset the costs of these hires in 2014 and early 2015. One of the reasons he outlined a gradual implementation of hiring new personnel was to allow for the possibility that one or two of the potential retirees could decide to stay on, in which case plans could be adjusted. Chief Ward said he had heard comments about appointing an SRO, and he said he would love to have 43 police officers so he could reassign another SRO. Councilman Pucciarelli said that suggestion could be revisited. Chief Ward added that new police officers are not given critical assignments; a minimum of three years’ experience is required for any specialized assignments before officers are even considered for such placements. Being able to hire new police officers in the manner suggested by Chief Ward would allow him to consider more senior officers and start putting them into the slots to replace more experienced officers. Ms. Mailander explained that this would allow for junior officers to move into senior officers’ slots, including two in the Detective Bureau; the officer who handles Internal Affairs (IA), and possibly officers in the Traffic Bureau.
Councilman Pucciarelli noted that the Essex County Police Academy begins in March. The first anticipated retirement is in May 2015. Chief Ward confirmed this, and added that it is possible that there will be four retirements from May-July 2015. Councilman Pucciarelli recalled the discussion to the effect that the Bergen County Police Academy is perceived to be better than the Essex County Police Academy, and he asked Chief Ward for his perspective if the officers were to be trained through the Bergen County Police Academy in July 2014. Chief Ward responded that valuable time would be lost, because nine months from July 2014 would place those officers on the road sometime in April 2015, right before the retirements are due to begin. He had hoped to get at least a three-month gap to allow training for more senior officers to become detectives, or to work in IA, or other higher-level jobs in the Police Department, and to take over the positions of the officers who will be retiring. The officers who are planning to retire are from the Detective Bureau. Regarding the different Academies, Chief Ward pointed out that recently, a couple of recruits were sent through the Essex County Police Academy. There have been no complaints so far about that Academy, although the Bergen County Police Academy does have a reputation for having a higher standard than most of the other Academies. However, the Essex County Police Academy does an excellent job. It must be noted that there is no charge for Ridgewood Police Department personnel to go through the Bergen County Police Academy, but the $3,000 cost for the two recruits would be offset by the overtime costs savings.
Councilman Riche clarified that police officers earn overtime pay when they work outside their normal shifts, which Chief Ward confirmed. Councilman Riche also clarified that police sergeants earn overtime pay when they work outside their normal shifts, which Chief Ward confirmed. The same applies to police lieutenants, which Chief Ward confirmed. Overtime pay is applicable to all police officers, except Chief Ward and Captain Luthcke, which Chief Ward confirmed. Councilman Riche noted that in the past, Chief Ward indicated that he had to use sergeants and sometimes lieutenants in overtime situations because of lack of manpower. Chief Ward confirmed this, adding that supervisory staff has been substantially cut in the Police Department. Higher level officers are pulled away from administrative tasks to cover patrol duties when there is a lack of manpower, or when training is being conducted. That is why Chief Ward has strongly urged the Councilmembers to reinstate one of his supervisory positions, specifically by adding another Captain, because it would be cheaper due to the fact that no overtime pay would be necessary for that position. Councilman Riche reiterated that it has sometimes been necessary for Chief Ward to use sergeants in overtime positions that might have been filled by patrolmen, had a patrolman been available. Councilman Riche pointed out that using sergeants in such cases leads to a higher rate of overtime being paid, due to the higher salaries paid to sergeants, exacerbating the overtime situation.
Next, Councilman Riche mentioned an email from Chief Ward to the Councilmembers, indicating that based upon his analysis, the last time two police officers were hired the number of police officers exceeded the limit allowed by the ordinance. This type of discussion was not held the last time this occurred. Councilman Riche said he could not understand why there is an arbitrary number limiting the amount of personnel who can serve in a public safety department. The number of personnel can be limited through funding mechanisms, and Councilman Riche does not believe it is necessary to have ordinances limiting the number of personnel, thus putting the Village in this situation. He added that he believes it is fair to say that hiring the two candidates immediately will decrease the budget, and is fiscally for the long-term. Chief Ward agreed, and added that it would also help with the issue of increased school safety, which the Police Department has been considering for some time. It will also help to reduce the overtime situation that Chief Ward currently faces.
Councilwoman Hauck said she has no doubt that there was some type of administrative error, and there is certainly a need for new hires on the police force. Therefore, it does make sense that these two candidates should be allowed to attend the Essex County Police Academy. While she wants to reconsider amending the ordinance, Councilwoman Hauck said she is a little cautious going forward with future hires due to many uncertainties. There will be future contract negotiations that could affect how people consider retirement going forward, and if those people will still want to retire in the future. In addition, the question of overtime affects the budget, and there is a question of whether it makes sense to add more police officers. Councilwoman Hauck also asked where the arbitrary number of possible staff members of the Police Department came from. She does not believe it was actually arbitrary, but someone must have decided that it would make sense to operate with that number of police officers. She also thinks it might be worthwhile to consider the size of the village and historically, how many people the Police Department has required. That number has fluctuated over the years. Councilwoman Hauck asked if the Police Department is drastically understaffed now, and Chief Ward answered that it is. He added that the number of police officers was up to 52 in the mid-1990s, and it was down to 48 by the year 2000. It remained at that number until approximately 2004, when it dropped to 47. Chief Ward said he has always maintained that he thought the Police Department would operate most efficiently with 46-48 officers. He would like to create a Services Unit, which would be a floater unit that could have a significant impact on the amount of overtime, as well as the costs associated with overtime, and provide additional services, including school and traffic safety services, to the community. The two new police officers who were hired will cost considerably less than the officers who are retiring.
Chief Ward referred to the matrix study done in 2007, which provided three structural options for the Police Department, which included 43-44 personnel, as well as providing recommendations for a command staff structure. The company to perform that study is a national company who performs such studies on a regular basis. They were brought in by the Village to do the study, which was based on best practices. Chief Ward said he is trying to move forward with the recommendations made in the study, and he hopes that the Councilmembers will move forward with him in trying to implement the recommendations. He understands the economic situation, but Chief Ward truly believes that the overtime situation can be significantly altered while still providing the services that Chief Ward wants to provide to Ridgewood.
Councilman Hauck thanked Chief Ward for answering her question, because she believes that the Councilmembers, especially the newer Councilmembers, need to understand all of the things pointed out by Chief Ward. However, she pointed out that every Village Department is shorthanded, and every Department is operating on an overtime basis, yet they cannot charge overtime costs to the Village in the same way that the Police Department can. Chief Ward explained that any employee who is a member of the union is entitled to overtime pay, and he referred that issue to the Village Manager. He added that if the number of police officers is limited, the Police Department loses its depth. If extra people are available to cover emergency situations, overtime costs are not incurred. Because he does not have staff available for such situations, overtime costs are currently very high. Such overtime costs can be incurred due to even the most minor events. For example, a domestic violence situation can take approximately 3-8 hours for response time and proper evaluation, with 2-3 officers involved. If there are not enough people on the shift to answer other calls, officers must be held over their normal scheduled working time in order to take other calls. Chief Ward commended the police officers’ union, which has been very cooperative with training issues, as well as being helpful in notifying him of expected retirements so the Police Department could be prepared and the community would not suffer due to a lack of personnel.
Councilwoman Walsh commented that she received many telephone calls about this issue, with people asking many questions, and she did not always have the answers to those questions. The majority of people asking questions wanted to know if Councilwoman Walsh was on the Village Council when the ordinance was changed, and she stated that she was. She recalled the conversations held about changing the ordinance, but she recalls that the number of police officers was supposed to be 43. Councilman Walsh realizes that she was mistaken. She also discovered that there were no less than four meetings in which this issue was discussed, and it was unanimously agreed by the Councilmembers to fund and hire these police officers. Councilwoman Walsh apologized to the public about the mistake she made, but said she feels strongly that these police officers are needed in Ridgewood. She pointed out that there was a Girl Scout at this meeting who has a plan to try to help keep the Village safer, which is a huge responsibility for her. In addition, Councilwoman Walsh said that incidents do occur on her street, especially in the spring, and it is sometimes necessary for her to call the police to respond to such incidents. Usually, two cars respond, which means there are fewer officers available to respond to other calls. She noted that overtime costs are skyrocketing, which was discussed during the budget process. The Councilmembers would like that number to decrease, and hiring these two police officers would help in solving that problem, although it will not completely eliminate the problem. Therefore, Councilwoman Walsh said she would like to move forward with introducing an amendment to the ordinance at the February 19, 2014, Public Meeting. This would benefit the Village by allowing it to honor the commitments made to the two candidates in question, as well as allowing the Councilmembers to hold discussions regarding future funding, because although the ordinance may specify a maximum number of police officers, that does not necessarily mean that the Police Department would get funding for that particular number of police officers.
Regarding the nepotism issue, Councilwoman Walsh said she has family members who work in law enforcement, including the Police Department, Fire Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as the Department of Public Works, New Jersey Transit, and it does seem to be a profession that runs in families. She is proud to have so many families in the Village who continually serve the Village.
Chief Ward responded that nepotism was never a consideration in the hiring of these two candidates. The Civil Service rules were followed. He also recommended that the number of police officers should remain open-ended in any amendment to the ordinance, and that the Village Council is the final authority on the number of police officers that will be hired.
Councilman Pucciarelli repeated what he said the previous week, which was that he was very sorry that two young men got caught up in this process. It was never the intention of anyone to cause this to happen to the two candidates, and Councilman Pucciarelli would like to see the situation corrected if at all possible.
However, Councilman Pucciarelli also stated that he could not nor would not apologize for pointing out that the Councilmembers were in danger of violating a Village ordinance if the two additional police officers were hired. He agreed with the statement made by Councilwoman Hauck when she said that she does not understand why the number is set at 41, and how anyone arrived at that number. Councilman Pucciarelli believes that the number of personnel in the Police Department should be a the result of a dynamic process that is worked out every year between the Chief of Police and the Village Manager, based on recent experience; the number of personnel already employed by the Police Department; and other criteria as may be set by the Chief of Police and Village Manager. The only input that should be sought from the Village Council would be during the budgetary process. For example, if it were possible to have 50 police officers while keeping within a set budget, that would be wonderful, and Councilman Pucciarelli believes that should drive the process. He does not feel he is in any position to say that the Police Department should have any particular number of police officers, because he does not have that expertise and is not willing to substitute his own judgment for those who do have that expertise. Therefore, going forward, after amending the current ordinance, perhaps the Chief of Police and the new Village Manager could meet and agree to a process in which the structure of the Police Department could be revisited in order to determine how many personnel could serve that structure.
Councilman Pucciarelli commented that with respect to the nepotism policy, whether anyone likes it or not, it is a policy, and the Councilmembers are required to vote on such matters. It cannot be disregarded unless the policy is revoked.
Finally, Councilman Pucciarelli recalled that there was a proposal to have an SRO made during public comments, and Chief Ward had a positive reaction to that proposal. Councilman Pucciarelli asked about the history of the SRO, and how would that process work in the current framework of the Police Department. Chief Ward responded that there at one time was an extensive Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program in the Village schools, and then an SRO program was started. The SRO position was lost sometime around 2010, when the number of personnel in the Police Department was cut. Due to current staffing constraints, Chief Ward said he is unable to commit an officer and/or officers to the schools in that position, although he receives regular requests to increase police presence in the schools. Chief Ward said he has tried to develop a third alternative in which police officers visit the schools during lunch time, and he visits the schools to talk to students, and holds school safety checks. However, having a dedicated SRO (or two) would have a wonderful impact on the schools, and give a greater police presence in the schools. Currently, two detectives serve as contacts for the schools. Chief Ward said he would require at least 43 officers in order to be able to commit to having an SRO. Councilman Riche pointed out that the Village lost some of its funding for the SRO, due to the expiration of a five-year grant, and the Board of Education was either unwilling or unable to pay the difference. Councilman Pucciarelli reiterated that he believes that should be a management decision, and the Village Council should not dictate whether an SRO should be appointed or not, although it does sound like a good idea.
Councilwoman Walsh recalled that last year, there was some sort of grant proposed to the Board of Education, which they turned down. Chief Ward remembered that it was a matching grant, and the Police Department was unable to move forward with that opportunity. In fact, the Police Department has missed some grant opportunities due to the fact that there is no active SRO program in the Village. Councilman Pucciarelli asked Chief Ward to explain how the SRO program works, and if it could be accommodated if the ordinance were amended.
Councilman Riche recommended that the amendment to the ordinance be put on the agenda for the February 19, 2014, Public Meeting for introduction and adoption. Councilman Pucciarelli noted that it has been a practice of the Village Council that, if one of the members who is not present asked that a matter be tabled until that member is present, that request is honored. In this instance, Mayor Aronsohn asked that he be present before the first reading of this proposed amendment, and he referred to specific questions that he would like Chief Ward to answer prior to February 19th. Ms. Mailander pointed out that the ordinance must be introduced at the meeting on February 19th so that it can be effective in time for the Essex County Police Academy. The consensus of the Councilmembers was that this matter would be discussed at the February 19, 2014, Public Meeting, possibly for introduction. Ms. Mailander said that guidance is needed regarding what the amendment should say, such as if the number of police officers should be kept open-ended, rather than specific; and if the language should state, as was previously mentioned, that the Village Manager and Chief of Police would assess the structure of the Police Department and make recommendations to the Village Council for the Councilmembers to approve funding. Councilman Pucciarelli stated that, speaking for himself, he thought it should contain language to the effect that the future number and structure of the Police Department be decided based upon an annual recommendation by the Village Manager and the Chief of Police. Councilwoman Walsh asked if the agenda for the February 19th meeting would also provide for the reinstatement or hiring of the two candidates under discussion. Ms. Mailander responded that it would not, but the amendment to the ordinance would allow that. Mr. Rogers explained that the ordinance basically states the law and the way that operations should go forward, and does not deal with a specific instance. Councilman Pucciarelli’s suggestion would allow for discussion on that ordinance, which would also allow the hiring of the two officers in question, without mentioning anyone specifically, while including as part of the amendment the ability of the Village Manager to meet with the Chief of Police to discuss personnel numbers every year, as well as the structure of the Police Department. Ms. Mailander pointed out that it is her understanding that all of the Councilmembers present want to move forward with the amendment to the ordinance. Mr. Rogers said he believes it might be safer to separate the issues, and move forward with the amended ordinance first, and deal with the numbers pertaining to the Police Department after that. Councilman Riche stated that he believes the issue is that a mistake was made, which will be corrected by introducing the amendment to the ordinance, and that will allow the Chief of Police to extend conditional offers of employment again to the two candidates, and they can enter the Essex County Police Academy in March. Beyond that, Councilman Riche stated that the number of personnel in the Police Department is a separate discussion, and one he is willing to have. Council Pucciarelli added that he would like to have a continued discussion on the implementation of an SRO program, but not as a condition of the amendment to the ordinance. Mr. Rogers clarified that Councilman Pucciarelli was asking for two separate ordinances: one dealing with the immediate issue, and another one to be introduced, and the Councilmembers could decide and vote on both of those ordinances, or was Councilman Pucciarelli asking for one ordinance covering both situations. Councilman Pucciarelli and Councilman Riche both answered that there should be two separate ordinances. Ms. Mailander asked if the Councilmembers wanted the number of police officers to be increased to allow for the hiring of the two candidates in question, or should the number be left non-specific. Councilwoman Walsh responded that, as she understood the situation, there should be an ordinance allowing for the hiring of the two candidates in question, with another ordinance that addresses the number of police officers in the Police Department in a more general way to be discussed further. She added that the availability of grant monies could also be part of the conversation regarding the second ordinance. Councilman Pucciarelli commented that if the Police Department is to be expanded by two officers for the reasons stated, there is another very good reason that was advanced tonight, which is that it would allow for the possibility of an SRO. He believes that the Councilmembers should encourage the implementation of an SRO program.
Councilwoman Hauck asked for clarification that there will be two ordinances, one of which will allow for the hiring of two additional police officers, and the other one will allow the number of police officers hired by the Police Department to be left up to the discretion of the Village Manager and Chief of Police. Mr. Rogers agreed, saying that was what was suggested by Councilman Pucciarelli. Neither of the ordinances will contain any language about the SRO program. The Councilmembers agreed to have the two ordinances put on the agenda for the February 19, 2014, Public Meeting.
Councilman Pucciarelli noted that the nepotism issue must still be decided, and Ms. Mailander pointed out that it had already been discussed in Closed Session, and it was already approved, so no further action is necessary. There would be more discussion about that during Closed Session.
3.) Parking Charges for Special Events in the Central Business District – Draft Ordinance
Ms. Mailander noted that a sample ordinance was prepared explaining the reasons for allowing the Village Manager to waive fees, which was based on recommendations made by Captain Luthcke and Janet Fricke, Assistant to the Village Manager. It allows the Village Manager to waive fees for up to 15 parking spots. In addition, it would allow the Village Manager to waive fees for areas next to the park or public spaces, such as the train station, especially on Sundays, when parking fees are not required. For the most part, Ms. Mailander explained that events to be considered for such fee waivers would be ones that are free and open to the public. Councilman Pucciarelli pointed out that no one has to pay parking meters on Sundays, and he asked if event sponsors are charge for bagging meters on Sundays. Ms. Mailander responded that the organization would be charged if the event was held for profit, because the spots would be reserved for that event. She cited as an example the Jazz Feast that was held last year, when one side of Oak Street was used as a staging area, and they were not charged for that. It is possible that the upcoming Daffodil Festival will need similar types of staging areas, and they would not be charged for bagging those meters. Events that are held for a profit would be charged for any meters that are bagged, even on Sundays.
Councilman Riche asked who initiated this ordinance. Ms. Mailander answered that Councilwoman Walsh asked for this to be put forward. Councilman Riche added that he would like to see some language inserted in the ordinance that the fee waivers should not be granted in a repetitive fashion. Mr. Rogers noted that the current wording of the ordinance deals with non-profit organizations, and events that are open to the public, especially on Sundays. It also provides that it is within the discretion of the Village Manager to allow or prohibit the waivers. Therefore, the Village Manager would have the ability to prevent such fee waivers if it were a repetitive thing. Mr. Rogers used the example of the Farmers’ Market, which is held on consecutive Sundays. The Village Manager might want to allow the fees to be waived for the Farmers’ Market, because it is open to the public. Councilman Riche noted that meters do not have to be paid on Sundays, and Mr. Rogers answered that the current ordinance provides for fees to be charged for bagging of the meters, because the parking spaces are being reserved for that group. However, the new ordinance would allow such fees to be waived, at the discretion of the Village Manager. Councilman Riche pointed out that it would be necessary to weigh the needs of the Farmers’ Market against the parking needs of the commuters who might be traveling to or from work on Sundays. This will be put on the agenda for the February 19, 2014, Public Meeting.
5. REVIEW OF FEBRUARY 19, 2014 AGENDA
Ms. Mailander announced that the Public Meeting would include the following Proclamation: Jamboree Days.
There are two ordinances to be introduced: Amend Chapter 145 Fees – Significant Sewer Discharge Fees; Amend Chapter 249 – Streets and Sidewalks – Parking Charges for Bagging Meters in the Central Business District; Amend Chapter 145 Fees – Day Camp Fees; Amend Chapter 3-43(D) – Police Department Personnel.
The Public Hearings include: Amend Chapter 244 – Smoking – Establish No Smoking Zones Around Schools; Amend Chapter 165 – Garbage, Rubbish, Refuse, Recycling – Hazardous Collection Conditions.
Resolutions include: Award of Contract – Cameras in Police Cars; Award of Contract – Operating System for Cameras in Police Cars; Cancel Property Taxes on General Energy Property; Award Contract under State Contract – Police Ammunition; Award Professional Services Contract – Child Health Conference; Award Professional Services Contract – 2014 Land Surveying Services Retainer for Preparation of Tax Assessment Map; Award of Extraordinary Unspecifiable Service Contract – Alarm Systems at Graydon Pool and the Stable; Title 59 Approval and Award of Contract for Two Sanitation Trucks; Authorize Sale of 1991 Fire Ladder Truck to Bergen County Fire Academy; Authorize Shared Services Agreement with Ho-Ho-Kus – Adult Health Clinic; Authorize Shared Services Agreement with Paramus – Wastewater Collection System Operator; Authorize Shared Services Agreement with Glen Rock – Municipal Court Services; Authorize Cellular Communications Upgrade for Cell Tower Water Pollution Control Facility; Title 59 Approval and Award of Contract – Maple Park Turf Cleaning; Award Contract – Printing for Municipal Election; Approve Girl Scout Gold Award Project – Pedestrian Safety Flags at Crosswalks in Central Business District.
6. MANAGER’S REPORT
Ms. Mailander thanked all of the crews who have been out working during the past two storms. Workers have reported to work as early as 2:00 A.M. to begin salting and plowing the roads, continuing throughout the day. In addition, workers have been scraping due to the fact that there is a salt shortage, which will help prevent slipping and sliding on the ice. Some crew members have gone home, but will return to work at 11:00 P.M. tonight to clear out the CBD. They plan to work until 7:00 A.M. tomorrow, with new crews coming in at approximately 6:00 A.M. to continue with some of the remaining salt. It is hoped that there will be a delivery tomorrow or Friday from the County, as well as from Atlantic Salt, of approximately 1,000 tons of salt. Many municipalities in New York and New Jersey are expecting salt deliveries. Another storm is anticipated next week, but it is not known exactly how much snow we will get. Ms. Mailander said that the crews are doing a great job keeping the streets and sidewalks clear.
In addition, Ms. Mailander urged everyone to sign up for e-notices. Registration is available through the Village website at www.ridgewoodnj.net. People can choose to receive the notices as text messages or as emails. This will allow residents to be notified if there any changes in sanitation schedules; and emergency or unusual weather conditions; as well as any other important messages that need to be disseminated throughout the Village.
Regarding sanitation collection for Thursday and Friday, Ms. Mailander reminded everyone that items should be placed at the ends of the driveways. Crews will no longer go into backyards because it is dangerous for them due to slippery conditions. Several crew members have already been injured.
Councilman Riche asked Ms. Mailander to repeat the policy regarding blowing or shoveling snow in the Village. Ms. Mailander stated that anyone who uses a snowblower or shovels snow should put the snow back on his/her property, as opposed to putting it into the street, which is illegal.
7. COUNCIL REPORTS
Parks, Recreation, and Conservation (PRC) Board – Councilwoman Hauck said that the “Fire and Ice” outdoor winter festival at Graydon Park was very successful. Approximately 1,550 people attended, which equals one out of 16 residents in the Village. It was a very relaxing afternoon. Councilwoman Hauck thanked all the employees who made it possible, including the Ridgewood Fire Department; FMBA 47; Signal Department; Water Department; and the Department of Parks and Recreation. Everyone worked day and night for a very long time to make the festival a success.
Fourth of July Committee – Councilman Riche stated that the Fourth of July Committee is always looking for volunteers.
Open Space Committee – Councilman Riche said that there is no Open Space Committee at this time, because none of its members were reinstated at the beginning of the year, and all of their terms have expired. Councilman Riche indicated to them that they will be asked to interview for their positions to be reinstated on the Committee. All of the current members are original members of the Committee, and have been responsible for all of the open space that has been acquired in the Village. Councilman Riche did not get positive feedback when he mentioned the interview process, so he asked Ms. Mailander to reach out to the Committee members to see if they were willing to be interviewed.
Financial Advisory Committee – Councilman Pucciarelli said that the Financial Advisory Committee will hold its next public meeting on Monday, February 10, 2014, at 7:30 P.M., in the Fourth Floor Caucus Room of Village Hall. Everyone is welcome to attend. One of the pending projects of this Committee is to look at Village Garage outsourcing alternatives before going any further with the current garage project on the Glen Rock site.
Ridgewood Arts Council – Councilman Pucciarelli stated that the Ridgewood Arts Council would have a proposal for the Councilmembers by the end of this month, and will be presenting it to the Village Council.
8. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Councilman Pucciarelli stated they would again have comments from the public and asked anyone wishing to address the Village Council to come forward.
Keith Killion, 315 Willow Court, stated that he has experience in the Ridgewood Police Department. When he first joined the Police Department, there were 54 police officers. After 16 weeks at the Police Academy, Mr. Killion was handed a badge and put out on patrol immediately. He has seen the number of police officers increase and decrease over the years. As a Captain in charge of training, Mr. Killion said he was given unfunded mandates from the Federal and State governments. Some of those mandates included right-to-know training; blood-borne pathogens training; and extensive firearms qualifications twice a year, all of which take police officers off the streets. The government has mandated that police officers undergo a lot of training in order to decrease incidence of malfeasance, as well as the possibility of lawsuits from police officers doing the wrong thing. Most of these mandatory trainings occur over multiple days. Some of them were specific to the Police Department, and others were mandatory for many different Village personnel. According to Mr. Killion, it is reached the point where manpower has decreased due to budgetary constraints, while training has increased, to the point where the Police Department cannot break even.
Regarding the School Resource Officer program, Mr. Killion said he started that program in the Village. He was the first SRO. Mr. Killion recalled that there was a time when police officers were only called to the schools when there were problems. One principal told him that he should not park his police car in front of the school, because people would get the idea that there was a problem at the school if they saw it. That was the mentality Mr. Killion encountered at that time. The SRO program was funded by a grant, and Mr. Killion was sent to two different training programs. The SRO program is valuable because it helps to stop problems before they reach the Police Department. It helped to educate teachers, parents, and students on how to deal with various problems associated with young people. It also helped to build a rapport with young people, so that the SRO becomes another person they can talk to if necessary. Mr. Killion offered the Councilmembers his services if any of them have questions about the SRO program and how it worked.
Frank Delvecchio, 65 Walthery Avenue, said that he first thought he misunderstood what was being said about the ordinance, but it has been explained to his satisfaction. Mr. Delvecchio offered some professional advice to the Councilmembers as a Police Chief: he thought that, rather than introducing two ordinances, it might be easier if the Councilmembers consider one ordinance, because according to Civil Service rules, the number of patrol officers can be kept open-ended, based on the needs of the department. That might help solve both of the issues raised. Councilman Riche responded that it does not matter to him, as long as the outcome is that the Chief of Police in Village Manager can use their discretion to decide how many officers are needed, and can then come to the Village Council to request funding for those officers.
Mr. Delvecchio also commended Ms. Mailander for the outstanding job she has done as the Acting Village Manager, and he said he hopes she is one of the candidates to be the new Village Manager.
Mayor Aronsohn arrived at the meeting at 9:26 P.M.
Ron Verdicchio, 391 Colonial Road, said the tone of the Village Council was very different than that of the Village Council last week. Mr. Verdicchio thought that Councilman Pucciarelli questioned Chief Ward in a very professional manner, using a non-accusatory tone, which is the way that Mr. Verdicchio believes public officials should conduct themselves while doing business with law enforcement personnel. The tone of the previous week’s meeting was very inappropriate, according to Mr. Verdicchio. He suggested that all of the Councilmembers should look at the tape of the previous meeting, because it is good human relations training.
Next, Mr. Verdicchio said he was not pleased with the implied background conversation regarding nepotism. He thinks that if there is an issue with nepotism in the Village, it should be put on the table. Such conversations should not be held in Closed Sessions, and that although the people involved should be protected, the discussions should be as open as possible.
Finally, Mr. Verdicchio stated that he was the Board of Education representative who worked with the SRO for three years. The program was funded during the Clinton Administration under the Safe Streets Funding grant, and it was a 50/50 grant. The program encompassed the pre- and post-Columbine era. Mr. Verdicchio’s job was to work with the SRO, the principals, and community organizations to ensure that there was an interface with the SRO and professional staff, as well as the community. It was disappointing when the program ended, and Mr. Verdicchio believes that any money spent by the Village on such a program would be money well spent. Resources should certainly be devoted to that area to do what is right for the children of Ridgewood, as well as for parents and the school community. Mr. Verdicchio also offered his services as a volunteer to help with any suggestions needed to get the program moving forward.
Mayor Aronsohn said he was very pleased that the issue of the SRO program had arisen. He has spoken with Chief Ward about that, as well as having many conversations with the Superintendent of Schools. Mayor Aronsohn thinks it is a fantastic idea, and he would love to reinstate it. He does not want it reinstated only for security reasons, but because it creates and strengthens the relationship between students and police officers.
Leonard Eisen, 762 Upper Boulevard, said he noticed several references during this meeting to saving money. He also reminded everyone of the request to place garbage cans and other refuse at the ends of driveways to avoid any injuries to Village employees, and Mr. Eisen said he could not see why that could not always be done. It is a very easy way to save money.
Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, noted the item on the agenda regarding the expenses for the municipal election. Mr. Loving said it reminded him that ordinarily, by this time, there would be an announcement posted on the Village website indicating the availability of petition packets for those who are seeking office. That announcement has not yet been posted on the website, nor has Mr. Loving heard the Village Clerk make any mention of the packets being available during any public meetings. In addition, a press release is usually sent to the newspapers regarding the availability of the packets, along with other information about them.
Ms. Mailander thanked him for the reminder, and said that the notification would be put on the website. The packets are currently available, and Ms. Mailander said that she is in the process of putting the press release together. Packets are available for pickup by any resident age 21 or over who is a registered voter. Each packet requires 168 valid signatures, which means that many more signatures must be obtained for verification purposes. There are two seats up for election: the one currently held by Councilwoman Walsh, and the one currently held by Councilman Riche. The deadline to return the completed packets is March 10, 2014, at 4:00 P.M. The packets can be obtained from the Village Clerk’s office.
There were no other comments from the public at this time, and Councilman Pucciarelli closed the time for public comments.
9. RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION
The following resolution, numbered 14-30, to go into Closed Session, was read in full by the Village Clerk, as follows:
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Riche, seconded by Councilwoman Hauck, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the meeting was adjourned at 9:35 P.M.
PAUL S. ARONSOHN, Mayor
DONNA M. JACKSON, Deputy Village Clerk
- Hits: 2341