A REGULAR PUBLIC WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, ON APRIL 26, 2023 AT 7:30 P.M.

1.                   CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

Mayor Vagianos called the meeting to order at 7:34 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call the following were present: Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Weitz, Winograd, and Mayor Vagianos. Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Eileen Young, Deputy Village Clerk; and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney.

Mayor Vagianos led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.

2.                   COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Matthew Rossi, 516 West Saddle River Road, stated that he wanted to set the record straight regarding some emails between him and Councilmember Winograd. On February 28, 2023, Mr. Rossi emailed Councilmember Winograd to ask where he could find information on the Village website about the Recreation and Open Space Inventory (ROSI) designation regarding the Schedler property. He said that he wanted to learn more about his property, since he lives near the Schedler property. He thanked Councilmember Winograd for sending him the requested information promptly. Mr. Rossi said that he was speaking only for himself and on behalf of no one else. He said that there will be a Closed Session held this evening regarding the Village’s possible purchase of 510 West Saddle River Road, which is close to his home. Mr. Rossi said that he did not think it was fair for the Village to hide these discussions from the public, since people may object for a myriad of reasons. Mr. Rossi asked the Village Council for more transparency regarding any proposed land acquisitions.

Robin Fisher, 412 North Monroe Street, said that she is the mother of four children who attend school at each level in the Village. She acknowledged the hard work performed by the Village Councilmembers in developing this year’s budget, but asked if they could reinstate the funding for the construction of sidewalks on West Glen Avenue. Ms. Fisher stated that she believed West Glen Avenue is the main road in Ridgewood, and is also a County road. Most cars traveling on West Glen Avenue rarely obey the speed limit and usually drive 30 miles per hour or faster. She said that she is constantly calling 9-1-1, because there are many car accidents at the intersection of North Monroe Street and West Glen Avenue. Ms. Fisher said that many children need to walk on West Glen Avenue in order to get to school, and there is also a bus stop in that area. She remarked that at 7:15 this morning, there were 15 people waiting at the bus stop, including some

children who take the bus to Ridgewood High School and commuters waiting to catch the bus to New York City.

Ms. Fisher said that these people must travel along West Glen Avenue in order to catch the bus. Therefore, she stated that it was critical for the Village Council to reinstate the sidewalk project on West Glen Avenue. She said that people on the west side of town want to walk to the Central Business District (CBD) in order to shop and dine, but it is dangerous without sidewalks. In order to cut down on pollution and have a “green town,” people should be encouraged to walk. She wondered what happened to the Safe Routes to School grant monies. Ms. Fisher urged the Village Councilmembers to allocate money in this year’s budget for at least part of the sidewalk construction, so that Ridgewood can be a safe walking town.

Clara De Freitas, 258 West Glen Avenue, said that she moved to Ridgewood last summer. She has a six-year-old daughter who attends Willard School. She said that she walks her daughter to school every day and it is dangerous because there are no sidewalks for them to walk on along West Glen Avenue. Ms. De Freitas said that she is speaking this evening to support the construction of sidewalks on West Glen Avenue.

Niti Mistry, 416 Colwell Court, said that she wanted to read a letter from Lynn Dewhurst, 176 West Glen Avenue: “One speeding driver who overcorrects, one new driver unsure on a hill that curves, one older driver whose reflexes are slowing down, one drunk or stoned driver, one distracted driver – that’s all it will take on a busy road, with almost no reminders of a little posted 25 mile-per-hour speed limit, to tragically change dozens of lives forever. Although my neighbors and I are hoping for the resurrection of the West Glen sidewalk project in full, at a minimum, can the Council consider sidewalks from Alpine to Heights on the even-numbered south side, where there is already pavement and where the road curves around to S. Hill with almost no verge? It would connect to the sidewalk that starts at Heights and continues down to East Glen. Please consider a crosswalk at Alpine where the sidewalk ends, at the part of the hill with the greatest visibility. There is already a permitted easement on the even side of West Glen, according to what we were told in 2021, but even without that easement, the Village could exercise eminent domain over four feet of the property at 172, 176, 180 and 184 and build a sidewalk. Finally, I respectfully suggest that the four feet of green space between road and sidewalk, as built at the top of the hill when the other portion began, is actually unnecessary, particularly as it adds expense and complexity to the project. In this instance, West Glen has plenty of grass and plenty of trees. What we need is a safe place to walk, run and roam.”

Ms. Mistry, on her own behalf, also asked the Village Council to reinstate the West Glen Avenue sidewalk project and complete it this year. She mentioned that Councilmember Reynolds met with some West Glen Avenue residents and walked along this busy road with them yesterday. Ms. Mistry said that Councilmember Reynolds realized how treacherous this road is, and she thanked Councilmember Reynolds for meeting with them. While she realizes there are budget

issues, Ms. Mistry feels that there are ways in which the costs of sidewalk construction could be reduced. She said that she does not, however, want the quality or aesthetics of the sidewalks to be compromised.

Saurabh Dani, 390 Bedford Road, thanked the Village Councilmembers for putting the matters  of the West Glen Avenue sidewalks and the refurbishment of the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge on the meeting agenda this evening. He also thanked Councilmember Reynolds for meeting residents who live on West Glen Avenue and walking along the busy road with them yesterday. While acknowledging that the Village Council has new priorities, Mr. Dani said that the Village has the ability to issue a bond to fund these new priorities, instead of taking money away from projects that had commenced but were not completed (the sidewalks and pedestrian bridge). He said that he feels that most projects are stopped at the design stage in the Village, due to concerns or opposition from neighborhood residents.

Mr. Dani acknowledged that West Glen Avenue is a County road and the Village needs permission and approval from them for the sidewalk design. Since all of that work has already been completed, and there is no opposition from the residents, Mr. Dani said that stopping the sidewalk project “in flight” is not a good idea, since the Village can complete the project through the issuance of bonds. This is a capital project, and if the Village Council has a reason to stop the project other than for lack of funds, Mr. Dani feels that the public has a right to know.

Mr. Dani asked what new expenses have occurred in 2023 which are causing an approximate 4.5% tax increase. He said that the improvements being performed by Ridgewood Water have been bonded separately and are not part of the regular Operating Budget. He said that if they are, they should not be. Mr. Dani recalled that health benefits have increased, but stated that Governor Murphy has budgeted $200 million for municipalities to compensate for these increases. Therefore, these health insurance increases should not be causing an increase to the Village’s municipal budget. The other capital projects, including $40,000.00 for a new Village website and $60,000.00 for garbage cans in the CBD, do not justify such a large tax increase. He said that any other large capital projects which the Village is contemplating should be bonded.

Rurik Halaby, 1 Franklin Avenue, asked the Village Council to arrange for Robert Rooney, Village CFO, to present and explain the 2023 budget at a Town Hall meeting with Village residents in attendance. He also stated that the residents who live on West Glen Avenue were “owed” a safe walking street with sidewalks on both sides. He said that residents should not have to pay for the incompetence of the prior Village Council and the limited capabilities of the Village’s Engineering Department. He said that the sidewalks should be completed, even if it costs $1 million.

Regarding the Schedler property, Mr. Halaby said he wanted to read an email which he sent to the Ridgewood News, but which was not published, on March 17, 2018. He said he would read

some excerpts but would give the complete letter to Ms. Mailander. He quoted: “Dear Editor, The Village Council, with one exception, is rushing pell mell to spend taxpayer funds to restore the Schedler house. I ask they cease and desist from spending a red cent on the house until they can answer the following basic commonsense questions. What makes the house so historically significant? What will the house be restored to? What is the budget for restoring the house and who will pay for it? I hear the figure $600,000.00 being bandied around. What will this cover and how is the number arrived at? What will the house be used for? Are we short of meeting space in Ridgewood and, if we are, is having space in a hard-to-reach part of town a sensible thing to have? What will it cost to maintain and operate the restored house going forward?”

Mr. Halaby said that he wished those questions had been asked five years ago. If those questions had been asked at that time, then the Village would not be facing the problems which now exist regarding the Schedler house. He said that the house currently looks like a “rat’s nest” and is unusable. Mr. Halaby stated that if the above questions had been answered five years ago, the walls in the house would probably have been knocked down to allow for larger meeting spaces, thereby making the house more usable. As the house presently exists, it cannot be used for weddings, as someone previously suggested. In addition, Mr. Halaby said that a house this small cannot be used to store historical documents.

Mr. Halaby said that there is a group which refers to the house as the “historic Zabriskie- Schedler house.” He said that if one looked at the application filed by Connelly and Hickey, historical architects, the justification used to register the house as historic is a “stretch” by any measure. He said that 10% of the houses in Ridgewood would qualify for an historic designation.

John Prieto, 663 Wall Street, said that he wanted to talk about the sidewalk construction on West Glen Avenue. He stated that sidewalks enhance safety and mobility and help to connect communities. Mr. Prieto said that the homes on West Glen Avenue do not have level front yards and the grading is not straight. He said that he is very familiar with the hazards on West Glen Avenue, because he drives and jogs on this street several times per week. He said that he cannot imagine the daily risks which these neighbors face when they attempt to walk near their homes without sidewalks. While the sidewalk project has become an issue about funding, Mr. Prieto said that it really is an issue of safety. Pedestrians walking on West Glen Avenue are at a dangerous disadvantage and need help. Therefore, Mr. Prieto urged the Village Council to fund the sidewalk construction on West Glen Avenue this year.

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, said that she wanted to comment about censored dialogue on social media, in terms of how it is being disregarded by certain Councilmembers. Until recently, Mayor Vagianos’s Facebook page was in violation of established rules for elected officials by censoring particular comments. Certain comments were blocked from view, so an open and transparent online discussion was impossible. Ms. Loving said that she contacted Mr.

Rogers, Village Attorney, and another resident contacted the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Jersey, about this violation. The violation has since been corrected.

On a private Facebook group, Ms. Loving said that Councilmember Winograd regularly posts about Village Council business. However, when members of the group reply, Councilmember Winograd often engages in online discussions with them. Regardless of which Facebook account Councilmember Winograd is using, Ms. Loving said that it is abundantly clear that she is posting as an elected government official. Ms. Loving said that comments are regularly deleted from these online discussions. Some citizens are blocked and commenting is sometimes completely turned off. She said that it is a Facebook administrator’s prerogative to do so; however, it is not Councilmember Winograd’s prerogative to conduct discussions about Village business that are censored and not open to those who wish to read those discussions or comment on them.

Ms. Loving stated that Councilmember Winograd’s continued participation indicates her tacit approval of the censorship that is taking place in that Facebook group. In order to comply with the Open Public Records Act (OPRA), Ms. Loving said that these discussions must be open and visible to all and cannot be selectively censored. Ms. Loving suggested that Councilmember Winograd refrain from posting anything regarding official Village business on this censored Facebook page. She can do so on her own Facebook page entitled “Winograd2022,” her official Councilmember page, which Ms. Loving indicated has to be open to all.

Ms. Loving said that she was shocked to learn that the ACLU has received several reports of free speech violations by Ridgewood Village Councilmembers in the past couple of months. She stated that this was very embarrassing to Ridgewood residents. Ms. Loving stated that it was unbelievable that two elected officials, who proclaim their devotion to free speech, open  dialogue and transparency, are violating these very tenets.

Alex Lipton Miller, 33 East Glen Avenue, said that she is speaking this evening on behalf of her neighbors, Chris and Ellen Wolfstirn, who live at 35 East Glen Avenue. She stated that there are complexities involved with the West Glen Avenue sidewalk construction, especially between North Maple Avenue and Oak Street. There are certain road features which add to the complexity of the project. She has been informed that her property specifically could pose some of those complexities, particularly her rock retaining wall in front of her property. She expressed her willingness to work with the Village Engineer to reduce these complexities as it relates to her property.

Ms. Miller stated that there are risks and liabilities associated with not proceeding with the sidewalk project. The risks include the safety of children crossing West Glen Avenue, accessibility for the disabled, and trespassing issues. Ms. Miller said that in order to exit or enter their driveways, residents must wait until cars are not coming along West Glen Avenue before they can safely do so. She said that this is especially difficult for the Wolfstirns who have two

very young children. Residents are very concerned about their children in the absence of sidewalks. Ms. Miller indicated that her father-in-law is disabled and she herself has had recurring issues with her knees, at times requiring crutches and a wheelchair. Her father-in-law has expressed fear and reservations about leaving his property to visit family. She is aware that some municipalities have become embroiled in litigation for failing to make streets accessible to the disabled.

Ms. Miller said that the new Master Plan specifically includes accessibility recommendations in its land use recommendations, including “examining whether pedestrian crossings are sufficient and safe for people with disabilities.” She said that West Glen Avenue is not safe for pedestrians or for those with disabilities. Regarding trespassing, Ms. Miller said that she has no problem with children walking across her lawn, but they are basically trespassing onto her property. Some children even walk on top of the retaining wall in front of her house. She said that while she keeps her property safe, she is afraid that she will be faced with a frivolous lawsuit if one of these children should get hurt. Ms. Miller said that the construction of sidewalks would solve this issue. She said that the absence of sidewalks poses a very serious monetary threat to the Village and to homeowners.

Frettra DeSilva, 520 West Saddle River Road, said that she sympathizes with the residents on West Glen Avenue regarding the sidewalks. She expressed the hope that the Village Councilmembers will carefully listen to the petitions of the residents for completing the sidewalks, since it is a matter of safety and well-being for those residents.

Ms. DeSilva stated that she was speaking this evening to ask for more transparency with regard to the Schedler property. She understands that the consultant, Peter Primavera, has been engaged by the Village Council this week and hopes that the information which he provides to the Village Council will be disseminated to the residents in a public forum, as well as posted on the Village website.

Ellie Gruber, 229 South Irving Street, stated that she was able to attend the joint meeting of the Parks, Recreation and Conservation Board (PRC) and Open Space Committee. She said that both committees do a fantastic job and work very hard. Regarding the Schedler property, Ms. Gruber stated that the public was shown previous plans dated 2022, and the Village Council recently approved other plans which were also dated 2022. She stated that she has yet to see any plans dated 2023. The approved plan shows the engineer’s name as Daniel Dunn and the date is October 2022. Ms. Gruber said that Christopher Rutishauser, Village Engineer, appeared before the Village Council on multiple occasions to present various conceptual plans requested by the Village Council. She asked for clarification regarding the dates on these sets of plans.

Ms. Gruber said that during public comments, someone mentioned that the Village now has “extra land.” She wondered what extra land the resident was talking about. At a prior meeting,

Councilmember Winograd and Deputy Mayor Perron both indicated that, at that time,  the Village had no plans to acquire any extra land. However, on this evening’s agenda is an indication that there will be a Closed Meeting to discuss the Village’s possible acquisition of property, contradicting the prior statements made by Councilmember Winograd and Deputy Mayor Perron. Ms. Gruber said that she had a feeling that the extra $500,000.00 allocated in this year’s budget, which is slated for the Schedler property, was set aside to purchase this adjacent piece of land. Ms. Gruber wondered how the Village Council could set this as a priority when residents were pleading for the sidewalk construction on West Glen Avenue to be completed. She said that Councilmember Reynolds was the only one who spoke up about the safety of residents being a priority. Ms. Gruber said that she felt it is ethically wrong for only one member of the public to be notified about a possible land purchase by the Village, when no other members of the public were informed.

Suzanne Ruane, 705 Kingsbridge Lane, thanked the Village Council for putting the West Glen Avenue sidewalk project and the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge project back on this evening’s agenda. She said that the footbridge has been closed for many years, and the alternative routes which residents are forced to take are more dangerous than the holes in the footbridge. Since it appeared to Ms. Ruane that the pedestrian bridge would not be fixed anytime in the near future, she reached out to Congressman Josh Gottheimer’s office regarding this matter. She attached pictures of the footbridge to her lengthy email, as well as the Ho-Ho-Kus Police report of the incident where a young boy was hit while riding his bicycle on one of these alternative routes.

Ms. Ruane continued by saying that Congressman Gottheimer’s office advised her to file an official complaint, so that they could investigate the matter. She expressed the hope that the Village Council will prioritize the repairs to the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge as well as the sidewalk project on West Glen Avenue, since they both represent safety issues and endanger people’s lives. They have nothing to do with a sports complex on the Schedler property.

Ms. Ruane said that it was her understanding that the $500,000.00 set aside for the Schedler property in this year’s budget is going to be used to purchase a property adjacent to the Schedler property. She said that the Village Council was jeopardizing people’s lives just so that they could build a sports complex, which she felt was disgraceful. She said that any discussion regarding the acquisition of adjacent Schedler property during this evening’s Closed Session should be done publicly and not in secret, particularly since the Village Council has prided itself on open dialogue and transparency. She said that the Village Council is now hiding things from people. Ms. Ruane expressed the hope that the Village Council will promptly address the safety issues regarding the West Glen Avenue sidewalks and the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge.

Yolanda Torres, 400 North Monroe Street, said that she lives in Ridgewood and is the mother of two daughters, aged 6 and 8 years. She lives on the corner of West Glen Avenue and North Monroe Street. Her husband travels three days per week to New York City for work, and he must

cross West Glen Avenue, where there are no sidewalks, in order to catch the bus. Ms. Torres added that her daughters are now learning how to ride their bicycles, and they all have to cross busy and dangerous West Glen Avenue while pulling along their bicycles. If there were sidewalks, she wouldn’t have to worry about them getting hit by a car. Ms. Torres asked the Village Council to please listen to the residents who are speaking in favor of completing the sidewalk project this year and not to wait until someone gets hurt or killed. Ms. Torres stated that she would like the Village Council to disclose to the public how the money is being spent this year in the budget.

Sean Fricke, 331 Gilbert Street, voiced his concerns and support for the construction of sidewalks on West Glen Avenue, since there are many residents who walk along this road. He said that as a disability attorney, he constantly witnesses the damage that vehicles can cause to the human body. He said that the Village Council should try to prevent such injuries from occurring by authorizing the completion of the sidewalk project along West Glen Avenue.

There were no further comments from the public.

Mayor Vagianos asked Mr. Rogers to comment on the issues raised by Ms. Loving this evening regarding social media. Mr. Rogers said that after being contacted by Ms. Loving, he investigated the matter and determined that there was no “blocking” going on. From a legal standpoint, he said that when an elected official uses a Facebook page to disseminate information about the municipality and government business, the page then becomes a public forum, and continued participation by the public, especially contradictory or oppositional comments, cannot be blocked by an administrator. Mr. Rogers reiterated that no blocking occurred, which would effectively prohibit a member of the group to participate. Therefore, he said that this incident  was not similar to a case in Glen Rock. He said that hiding or setting aside comments is not the same thing as blocking or removing a comment or member. After discussing this matter with Mayor Vagianos, Mr. Rogers said that Mayor Vagianos went back to his Facebook page and unhid the hidden comments.

Regarding the issue raised by Ms. Loving regarding Councilmember Winograd, Mr. Rogers said that Councilmember Winograd made comments on a Facebook page which is privately run by an administrator and she has no control over exactly what gets removed from the page or what is allowed to be posted. Therefore, Mr. Rogers stated that Councilmember Winograd was not in violation of the Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) or the Open Public Records Act (OPRA). Mr. Rogers said that he explained all of this to Ms. Loving.

3.                    MANAGER’S REPORT

Ms. Mailander stated that “Council Chat” is held on the first Saturday of every month. The next “Council Chat” is scheduled on May 6, 2023 from 9:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. in the Village Hall

Courtroom. Interested individuals should call to make a reservation at 201-670-5500, extension 2207. Walk-ins are welcome, but priority will be given to those who have made reservations.

The Health Department will be holding its annual Dog Rabies Clinic at the Graydon Pool parking lot on Wednesday, May 3, 2023 between 6:00 P.M. and 7:00 P.M. Dogs should be leashed. This will be a drive-by clinic. All dogs aged seven months or older must be licensed. Dog license renewals will be sent out via email during the last week of April. Renewals are due before June 30, 2023 in order to avoid a late fee.

The Ridgewood Health Department, Stigma-Free Committee and community partners will present a Mental Health Comedy Show on Thursday, May 18, 2023 from 7:00 P.M. to 8:30 P.M. at the Ridgewood Library Auditorium. Admission is free, and individuals are encouraged to attend this hilarious and unique performance, which will offer a comedic look at mental health. Registration is required. Interested individuals may call 201-670-5500, extension 2312, for further information or to register, or can send an email to dpagani@ridgewoodnj.net. This program is recommended for individuals aged 18 years or older. Refreshments will be provided.

Early Bird Registration for Graydon Pool membership ends on April 30, 2023. Early registration will provide reduced rates for Ridgewood residents, adults and children. Interested individuals may sign up through Community Pass. Visa or MasterCard is accepted. There is a 3% convenience fee charged for all credit card usage. Preseason badge distribution or in-person assistance will be available on May 14 and May 21 from 10:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. at Graydon Pool. For the 2023 Graydon Pool season, families may now purchase a babysitter’s badge for

$195.00. This badge can be used by live-in nannies, au pairs, multiple daily babysitters over the age of 18, or grandparents caring for a child that day. This badge cannot be used unless the babysitter is accompanied by the child badge holder, and the babysitter is not permitted to bring guests during any visit to the pool.

Online registration for tennis and pickleball badges is also available on Community Pass. Summer Day Camp is offered to Ridgewood children entering grades 1-6 in the fall. This six- week program will be held from Monday, June 26 through Friday, August 4, 2023 from 9:00

A.M. to 1:30 P.M. Interested families may be put on the waitlist through Community Pass, since camp registration is currently full. Individuals with any questions may contact the Parks and Recreation Office at 201-670-5560.

Ms. Mailander reminded everyone that the two day per week irrigation regulations are in effect year round. Odd-numbered addresses may irrigate their lawns, shrubs, flowers and trees on Tuesdays and Saturdays, and even-numbered addressed may irrigate on Wednesdays and Sundays. No irrigation is allowed on Mondays, Thursdays or Fridays.

Ridgewood “Learn to Ride and Safe Skills” bicycle course will be held on May 13, 2023 at the Graydon Pool parking lot. Children can learn how to ride a bike with a “balance first” approach. Instructors will teach children how to balance and control their bikes with the pedals removed, and will also teach basic safety skills. Learn to Ride Session 1 for children ages 5 and over will be held from 9:00 A.M. to 10:00 A.M. The Safe Bike Skills Course for children in grades 3-11 will be held from 10:15 A.M. to 11:45 A.M. Learn to Ride Session 2 for children ages 5 and over will be held from 12:00 P.M. to 1:00 P.M. The cost is $15.00 for Ridgewood residents and

$30.00 for non-residents. Interested individuals may register at Community Pass at www.ridgewoodnj.net/communitypass and should only sign up for one session before May 5, 2023. All of this information is posted on the Village website.

Ms. Mailander indicated that the 2023 Wellness Series will promote healthy eating, exercising, financial literacy, environmental sustainability, mental health, reducing stigma, and increasing social support. As part of the wellness events, the Parks and Recreation Department is offering “Chill Out – Gentle Yoga” on Mondays in May from 1:30 P.M. to 2:15 P.M., and “Fishing to Free the Mind” on Saturday, May 29th, with two sessions to choose from: 9:30 A.M. to 11:30

A.M. or 12:20 P.M. to 2:30 P.M. Interested individuals should register via Community Pass.

The annual “Touch A Truck” event will be held on Thursday, May 18, 2023 from 9:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. in Memorial Park at Van Neste Square. Children will be able to take a seat behind the wheel of a real police cruiser, climb aboard a shiny firetruck, and closely explore other emergency and public works vehicles. There will also be a Safety Town kiddie car driving track hosted by the Ridgewood Police Department and Little Ivy Learning Center. A special truck story time will be hosted by the Ridgewood Library.

“No Mow May” is an initiative where Ridgewood residents pledge not to mow their lawns in the month of May, in order to preserve the habitats of many insects and bees and to promote conversations about the environment. The optimum time to leave grass uncut for the benefit of bees and other pollinators is during the month of May. All residents who are interested in participating must register on the Village website. Registered residents should go to the Ridgewood Library or Recreation Department at the Lester Stable to pick up the lawn sign announcing that they are participating in “No Mow May.”

The pedestrian plaza, where streets are closed to vehicular traffic from Walnut Street to Broad Street along East Ridgewood Avenue, will be held on Saturdays and Sundays from June 3 to October 9, 2023. Music and entertainment will be provided in Memorial Park at Van Neste Square on Saturday and Sunday nights. There will be a cultural theme each month and special activities for children. Ms. Mailander encouraged everyone to dine and enjoy the entertainment in the CBD this summer.

The Kasschau Memorial Shell at Veterans Field is celebrating its 65th anniversary of providing music under the stars this summer. Performances are held on Tuesday and Thursday evenings from June through the beginning of August. The Kasschau Memorial Shell Committee is running a community donation campaign, with a goal of raising $25,000.00 to support upcoming events and a scholarship fund. There are five contribution levels for the fundraiser. Online donations may be made online at www.kasschaumemorialshell.com. All contributing donors will be recognized on the website. Any contribution of $50.00 or more will be recognized on a donor wall, which will be present at all concerts throughout the 2023 season.

Kathryn Komsa Schmidt and the First Flight Theater Company are producing a musical called “Green, The Musical” on Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 7:00 P.M. at the First Presbyterian Church on East Ridgewood Avenue, and on May 7, 2023 at 2:00 P.M. at the Ridgewood Public Library. Admission is free and donations to the Jamboree Scholarship Fund are welcomed at the door. Interested individuals should call 201-315-0257 for more information or email at kathrynkumsa@gmail.com. This musical is completely original, from the dialogue to the musical score.

Upcoming Village Council meetings are broadcast live from the Village Hall Courtroom, on the Village website, on FIOS Channel 34 and YouTube. Meetings can now be attended either in person or via Zoom or phone. On April 27, 2023 at 7:30 P.M., there will be a Budget Public Hearing and Adoption meeting in the courtroom at Village Hall. The next Public Meeting is scheduled for May 10, 2023 at 7:30 P.M. The next Village Council Work Sessions will be held on May 3 and May 24, 2023 at 7:30 P.M. All Public Meetings and Work Sessions will have hybrid access. The public is welcome to attend all meetings except for Closed Sessions.

4.                   COUNCIL REPORTS

Councilmember Weitz said that he wanted to reply to a comment made by Mr. Dani earlier this evening. He explained that the Village is not spending more money this year, but that less revenues are being anticipated in 2023. Covid relief funds totaling $2.6 million received by the Village in 2021 and 2022 will not be received in 2023. Healthcare costs have risen exponentially for all Village employees, and the Village’s biggest expenditure pertains to salaries and wages pursuant to cost-of-living raises and contractual obligations (step raises). Councilmember Weitz said that aid from the State regarding healthcare increases will probably not be received by the Village until next year.

Councilmember Weitz stated that he attended the meeting of the Ridgewood Library last night. He said that the Author Luncheon and Repair Workshop they recently held were a huge success. He viewed a presentation in commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the Ridgewood Library. Councilmember Weitz stated that the Library is one of the gems of the Village. At the meeting, they discussed improvements made to the Library, including a Teen Area, with private funding.

Councilmember Weitz stated that he and other Village Councilmembers attended the Interfaith Holocaust Memorial Service a couple of weeks ago, which he stated was incredibly moving and thoughtful. This event was attended by clergy from all faiths, and was hosted this year by the Westside Presbyterian Church. The keynote speaker spoke about Varian Fry, a Village native and parishioner of the Westside Presbyterian Church, who saved thousands of Jewish people from the atrocities of the Holocaust.

Councilmember Winograd said that on April 15, 2023, she met with students from Ridgewood High School and members of the Green Team to plant 17 trees along Stevens Field. She thanked Mr. Bailey, as well as Carolyn Jacobi from the Shade Tree Commission. On this day, she also attended a pop-up store held by the Ridgewood Guild on East Ridgewood Avenue next to Bare Burger. She said that the Ridgewood Guild is trying to think of novel ways to promote commerce in the Central Business District. All items at the pop-up sale cost less than $50.00. It generated a lot of foot traffic and gave people the chance to see the inside of this vacant store.

On April 16, 2023, Councilmember Winograd said that she and Deputy Mayor Perron attended an event honoring first responders at Law Enforcement Appreciation Day held at the Good Shepherd Church in Glen Rock. She thanked Linda Scarpa for organizing this wonderful event.

Councilmember Winograd stated that she also attended the Interfaith Holocaust Memorial Service at Westside Presbyterian Church. She said that the service was incredibly moving. She praised the Interfaith Clergy Council of Ridgewood, which works with the spiritual leaders of the Village’s diverse faith communities. The keynote speaker gave a presentation on Varian Fry, was a local hero who attended Westside Presbyterian Church.

On April 18 and April 25, 2023, Councilmember Winograd met with the Pride Committee and SAGA (Sexuality and Gender Association) at Ridgewood High School, along with representatives from the Ridgewood Police Department, to discuss the organization of Pride Day 2023. Students are developing a flyer for the Pride Day event, which will be held on June 10, 2023.

In addition, Councilmember Winograd met with members of the Communications Committee on April 18, 2023. Councilmember Winograd expressed gratitude to Ms. Mailander and Dylan Hanson, Director of the IT Department, for their assistance during discussions for the Village’s new website. They are first attempting to inventory the various software programs which are currently being used by the Village, and are developing a needs analysis survey which will be sent out to the community.

On April 25, 2023, Councilmember Winograd also attended a joint meeting with the Parks, Recreation and Conservation (PRC) Board as Council Liaison, along with Deputy Mayor Perron,

who is Council Liaison for the Open Space Committee. They are combining meetings such as this, since many committees have overlapping synergies. This informative meeting was very well attended by Village residents who use Village fields for both passive and active recreation. She thanked the committee members, Ralph Curry and Rich Brooks, for facilitating the meeting.

Councilmember Winograd said that she wanted to respond to some public comments made earlier this evening. She said that Ms. Gruber was correct in stating that the conceptual design approved for the Schedler property last week by the Village Council does indeed have the wrong date on it. She asked Ms. Mailander if the date could be corrected, and Ms. Mailander replied in the affirmative.

Regarding the subject of open space, Councilmember Winograd explained that ROSI (Recreation and Open Space Inventory) is a database maintained by the Green Acres Program. She said that Ridgewood is fortunate to have an Open Space Committee. A certain amount of taxes are dedicated to open space, similar to the tax for the Ridgewood Library. One-half of one cent of every tax dollar paid by residents is put into a trust for open space acquisition. She said that this was one of the largest financial weapons against overdevelopment in the Village. The purchase of the Habernickel and Schedler properties could not have been accomplished without these trust funds. Municipalities are required to prepare a ROSI as a condition of applying for and receiving Green Acres funding.

Councilmember Winograd said that adjacent parkland is always appealing to any municipal government. When she went to George Washington Middle School, there were three houses located where Citizens Park exists today. The land was acquired by the Village in order to expand the acreage of Citizens Park. Councilmember Winograd said that it is incumbent upon the Village Council to look at any property adjacent to the Schedler property, in the event that it should become available on the market. Councilmember Winograd said that the PRC Board and Open Space Committee are going to start listing Village Parks on social media, including Instagram.

Councilmember Reynolds stated that, regarding water restrictions previously announced by Ms. Mailander, underground sprinkler systems are only allowed to be used between 3:00 A.M. to 7:00 A.M., unless a resident applies for and receives an exemption from the Village due to newly planted landscaping or sod. Watering is never allowed between the hours of 10:00 A.M. and 6:00

P.M. She emphasized the fact that these same water restrictions have been in place for five years, so they are not new water restrictions. The restrictions are applicable year round.

Councilmember Reynolds stated that the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC) met on April 20, 2023. They discussed the unscheduled installation of traffic lights and bump-outs along the Franklin Avenue corridor. Plans have been in place for years for this installation, but they are awaiting approval from Bergen County, since Franklin Avenue is a County road. One committee

member suggested that a letter be sent from the Village Council to Bergen County to find out when this work can be completed and what is holding it up. Mayor Vagianos stated that this could absolutely be done. He asked if perhaps the committee members could write up a draft letter, since they are most familiar with the work to be done on Franklin Avenue, and present it to the Village Council for approval. Councilmember Reynolds said that she would see that this is done.

Councilmember Reynolds said that at the CSAC meeting, they also discussed the sidewalk construction project on West Glen Avenue and how critical it is that this project be completed for safety reasons. She expressed hope that the discussion regarding same this evening will be productive.

Councilmember Reynolds stated that East Glen Avenue and Bogert Avenue are in need of additional lighting. She said that Officer Torino reported that lighting at various intersections throughout the Village are being reviewed for possible placement of LED directional lighting, as part of the “Operation Bright Idea” program sponsored by Public Service Electric & Gas (PSE&G).

The CSAC members also discussed cars traveling the wrong way on Union Street, which is a one-way street. Jovan Mehandzic from the Engineering Department was looking into the status of the painting of safety markers and arrows on Union Street. Officer Torino is also investigating the installation of more one-way signs on Union Street, to alert drivers that Union Street is a one- way street.

In addition, a discussion was held at the CSAC meeting regarding public school grounds being utilized by residents. There is a concern about strangers being around school children. Sheila Brogan of the Board of Education suggested better signage and wording, which would either allow or restrict the use of public school grounds when children are or are not present.

A resident attended the CSAC meeting and voiced concerns regarding the Kingsbridge Lane Footbridge being closed for approximately two-plus years. The resident was told that this matter would be placed on the agenda this evening. The next CSAC meeting will be held on May 18, 2023 at 7:30 P.M.

Councilmember Reynolds stated that she met yesterday with some residents who live along West Glen Avenue. They walked along West Glen Avenue, and Councilmember Reynolds said that it was treacherous and scary walking along that road without any sidewalks. Cars were whizzing by as she teetered on the edge of the curb. Children walk on this road every day on their way to school. Residents also walk there with their children in strollers. Councilmember Reynolds said that the Village Council must allocate funds to complete the sidewalk construction on West Glen Avenue.

Deputy Mayor Perron said that on April 22, 2023, Green Ridgewood, the Conservancy for Ridgewood Public Lands, and the Parks and Recreation Department hosted the Daffodil Festival and Earth Day Fair in Memorial Park at Van Neste Square. She said that, thankfully, the rain stopped just in time for everyone to enjoy the celebration. There was a “green” real estate agent present and a Daffy Dog Parade was held, along with musical entertainment by Blue Plate Special. She urged everyone to attend the fair next year. “No Mow May” was promoted at the fair, and there are currently 132 homes signed up for this initiative. Participation is free and residents can only do a portion of their lawn, rather than their entire lawn.

The Ridgewood Historical Society and Schoolhouse Museum are holding their gala to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Schoolhouse Museum, which will be held on May 18, 2023 at Felina’s Restaurant. Tickets may be obtained online at ridgewoodhistoricalsociety.org.

The Open Space Committee met with the PRC Board and they discussed effectuating the Open Space action items delineated in the Master Plan. She joined Councilmember Winograd during the tree planting at Stevens Field and learned how to use a pick axe and shovel.

The Central Business District Advisory Committee (CBDAC) met recently and discussed the Chamber of Commerce’s Strategic Plan. Paula Gavin, the consultant used by the Chamber of Commerce, learned during her study that residents desire a unified calendar of events in the Village. She suggested that an annual calendar could be created by CBDAC members which detailed events occurring in the CBD. The subcommittee doing work on the pedestrian tunnel at the train station met this morning and discussed the mural design and its execution. Deputy Mayor Perron said that this project is coming together nicely.

Mayor Vagianos said that he attended the ACCESS Ridgewood Committee meeting in Councilmember Winograd’s stead. Their main project currently is searching for a location for a bakery that employs adults with special needs.

Mayor Vagianos said that he also attended the Interfaith Holocaust Service at the Westside Presbyterian Church. He was particularly struck by the fact that the minister from Westside Presbyterian Church was wearing a yarmulke, as many people in attendance were, to show solidarity for all faiths. Mayor Vagianos said that he felt uplifted and hopeful, given the current state of affairs in the world.

5.                   DISCUSSION

A.                 AWARD CONTRACT – DISPOSAL OF YARD WASTE AND GRASS CLIPPINGS

Ms. Mailander indicated that quotes must be obtained every year for the disposal of yard waste and grass clippings generated by Village residents. Three bids were received. It is recommended that this contract be awarded to RVH Mulch Supply, LLC, of Wyckoff, New Jersey, at the rate  of $24.00 per cubic yard, in an amount not to exceed $75,000.00. Funding is in the Operating Budget. Last year, the quote received from RVH was $22.00 per cubic yard. A caveat is contained in the contract which states that if the Village experiences a good growing season, additional monetary awards may be needed. The Village is prohibited from disposing of yard waste materials at its leaf compost facility, because of the permit with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP).

Deputy Mayor Perron asked whether the Village used to dispose of yard waste at the Lakeview Avenue facility. Ms. Mailander said she thinks this was done a long time ago. Mr. Rutishauser, Village Engineer, stated that current permits, and all permits renewed over the past 20 years, prohibit grass clippings to be comingled with the leaf compost. The NJDEP’s rationale is that there is not an adequate setback distance at the Lakeview facility to the surrounding property owners. Grass clippings require a 1,200 foot setback and leaves only require a 250 foot setback. The Lakeview facility has the required 250 foot setback for the leaves, but not the required 1,200 foot setback from the homes for the grass. However, Mr. Rutishauser indicated that grass is actually very good for the compost, and makes an excellent additive when mixed into it.

Deputy Mayor Perron asked Mr. Rutishauser about branches and similar yard waste. Mr. Rutishauser said that when glass clippings and branches are picked up at the curb already mixed together, the branches are not separated out and it all goes out as grass. If brush is picked up separately, the brush is generally run through the tub grinder to reduce its volume. Branches are not mixed in with the leaf compost. During the Nor’easter during Halloween in 2010 or 2011, when all of the yard waste was picked up at the curb, there was a tremendous amount of  branches mixed in with the leaves. This resulted in the compost being very fibrous the following year. He stated that leaves decompose over nine or ten months very nicely, but the branch material, even when put through the tub grinder, is too fibrous and degrades the value of the compost.

2.                   AWARD CONTRACT – DISPOSAL OF RECYCLING AND NAME CHANGE OF COMPANY

Ms. Mailander indicated that this item pertains to the awarding of a contract for disposal of recyclable materials. It is recommended that the contract be awarded to Atlantic Coast Recycling, which used to be called Atlantic Coast Fibers, of Passaic, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $120,000.00. This is the second optional year of the contract. Funding is contained in the Recycling Operating Budget.

3.                   AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENT – TREATMENT WORKS APPROVAL – PROSPECT PFAS TREATMENT FACILITY

Ms. Mailander explained that this item pertains to the authorization of a document for Treatment Works Approval (TWA) for the Prospect PFAS treatment facility, as required by the NJDEP. Ridgewood Water’s Prospect Street Well Facility is in the process of constructing a granular activated carbon treatment system as part of their PFAS treatment plan. This will require discharge of backwash water to the Village’s sanitary sewer collection system and subsequent treatment by the Water Pollution Control Facility. The TWA is required due to the quantity of the discharge. The TWA requires an authorized representative of the Village to review and sign the permit application. It is recommended that Mr. Rutishauser, Village Engineer and Director of Public Works, be authorized to execute the permit on behalf of the Village.

There was a motion by Deputy Mayor Perron, seconded by Councilmember Reynolds, to suspend the Work Session and convene a Special Public Meeting.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:          Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Weitz, Winograd; Mayor Vagianos NAYS: None

ABSENT: None ABSTAIN:  None

At the end of the Special Public Meeting, there was a motion by Deputy Mayor Perron, seconded by Councilmember Reynolds, to adjourn the Special Public Meeting and reconvene the Work Session.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:          Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Weitz, Winograd; Mayor Vagianos NAYS: None

ABSENT: None ABSTAIN:  None

6.                   DISCUSSION

A.                 RIDGEWOOD WATER

1.     AUTHORIZE LEASE OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA – GLEN AVENUE

Ms. Mailander explained that this item pertains to the authorization of a lease of a wireless telecommunications antenna at the Glen Avenue Water Tank in Midland Park. On March 22, 2023, Ridgewood Water accepted bids for this project, which involves the lease of tank and ground space for the installation of new communication and related equipment on the tank.  Three bids were picked up and one was received. It is recommended that this lease be awarded to DRW NX, LLC, of Chicago, Illinois, in the amount of $441,600.00 per year. They will enter into a lease with Ridgewood Water and make monthly payments of $36,800.00 for the tank and ground space. The rent will commence once DRW receives their permit approvals and meets the document requirements in the bid specifications.

Deputy Mayor Perron asked if the tank and ground space were currently being rented. Ms. Mailander replied that the tank and ground space are being rented currently to multiple companies. Richard Calbi, Director of Ridgewood Water, stated that there are currently four other providers renting space on the tank, similar to DRW NX LLC. There is also one mobile carrier, T-Mobile, renting space as well. The rent from DRW NX will be one of the highest rents that Ridgewood Water has ever achieved, which will help in their efforts to mitigate PFAS contamination in the water. Mr. Calbi thanked Mr. Rogers for his assistance in this regard. Mayor Vagianos thanked Mr. Calbi, Ms. Mailander and Mr. Rogers for their efforts in obtaining this rental.

When questioned by Councilmember Winograd, Mr. Calbi replied that DRW NX LLC will deal directly with Midland Park regarding the necessary paperwork and permits.

B.                 BUDGET

1.     CANCELLATION        OF       2022                                        BUDGET                                        EMERGENCY APPROPRIATIONS

Ms. Mailander stated that there were two emergency budget appropriations in 2022: one for the purchase of equipment for the Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) and one for Utility Expenses and Bulk Purchases (gasoline and diesel fuel). These appropriations were declared to prevent health and safety issues to both Village employees and residents. Canceling the balances in both appropriations will provide financial relief in the 2023 municipal budget, by not incurring a deferred expense charge. Ms. Mailander indicated that these two resolutions will be considered at the Budget Hearing and Adoption Meeting scheduled for tomorrow, April 27, 2023.

2.     REFURBISHMENT OF KINGSBRIDGE LANE BRIDGE

Ms. Mailander stated that this item pertains to the refurbishment of the Kingsbridge Lane Pedestrian Bridge. She reminded everyone that an independent engineer, Lahita Engineering, was hired to provide specifications and engineering estimate for the repair or refurbishment of

the bridge. The repair estimate received from Lahita Engineering amounts to $396,192.26. She said that there is currently $67,801.76 available to spend for this project. Part of the monies from the bond ordinance of $100,000.00 was used to pay for the services provided by Lahita Engineering.

Mr. Rutishauser stated that, pursuant to a request from the prior Village Council, the Engineering Department solicited an engineering firm to estimate the costs of the necessary repairs to the bridge, so that its current appearance could be maintained, minus the deterioration. As mentioned by Ms. Mailander, the engineering firm estimated that it would cost $396,192.26 to repair the bridge. Additional funding will be needed if the Village Council wishes to proceed along these lines. The bid is ready to be sent out, with the completed plans and specifications.

Councilmember Winograd recalled that there was a prior discussion about replacing the bridge in its entirety, rather than repairing it. She asked how much it would cost to replace the bridge. Mr. Rutishauser replied that on June 23, 2021, he made a recommendation to replace the bridge. He gave a budget of between $325,000.00 and $375,000.00 for a new bridge, which would include manufacturing, delivering and installing the bridge. When asked if the bridge would be modular, Mr. Rutishauser said that it would be. Councilmember Winograd asked if it were possible to go back to replacing the bridge rather than repairing it. Mr. Rutishauser replied that when he was researching the costs for a new replacement bridge, he was dealing with a manufacturer from a design-build perspective. Lahita Engineering would conduct a “design, bid, build” repair project.

Councilmember Winograd asked if there would be any difference in functionality between repairing the bridge or replacing the bridge. Mr. Rutishauser said that there are several differences. The bridge replacement which he recommended in 2021 would need to be ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessible. Lahita Engineering, when hired to prepare the specifications for repair of the bridge, had to determine whether the bridge needed to be retrofitted to the current ADA standards under PROWAG (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines). If the bridge were to just be repaired, it would not need to be ADA compliant.

Councilmember Winograd asked Mr. Rutishauser what the lead time would be for the new replacement bridge. Mr. Rutishauser said that the price he gave in 2021 for replacement of the bridge of between $325,000.00 and $375,000.00 would probably be double or triple that amount at this time, citing supply chain issues and inflation. He said that the numbers quoted in 2021 are no longer realistic.

Ms. Mailander asked Mr. Rutishauser if he could get updated prices for replacement of the bridge, and Mr. Rutishauser replied that he could. Ms. Mailander asked about any restrictions regarding the design-build. Mr. Rutishauser replied that the State of New Jersey adopted a law called Chapter 71 on design-build, and it took almost a year for the Ridgewood Finance

Department to get an answer from the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) that they only allow a design-build for projects over $5 million.

Councilmember Winograd asked Mr. Rutishauser what the plan was in terms of money to replace the bridge. Councilmember Reynolds replied that the prior Village Council set aside the sum of $100,000.00 last year, because there were no other funds in the budget to allocate for the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge. The sum of approximately $32,000.00 was spent to hire Lahita Engineering, because at that time, the prior Village Council did not know whether or not the bridge was repairable or would need to be replaced in its entirety. She mentioned that it has taken since last year for the Village to finally receive the repair estimate from Lahita Engineering.

Councilmember Reynolds asked Mr. Rutishauser if Lahita Engineering would actually perform the bridge repairs. Mr. Rutishauser replied that Lahita Engineering has prepared plans and specifications detailing what they recommend be done for the repair of the bridge. A contractor would have to perform the actual repairs. If the Village Council wanted to go ahead with repairing the bridge, Mr. Rutishauser said that he could ask Lahita Engineering for the names of some qualified contractors. Councilmember Reynolds asked if a Request for Proposal (RFP) would be required for the repairs, and Mr. Rutishauser said that it would be a “straight out” public bid where any qualified firms would be able to bid on the project.

Councilmember Reynolds asked Mr. Rutishauser if he felt that the figure of $396,192.26 was fairly accurate for repairing the bridge. Mr. Rutishauser replied that the bids could come back “all over the place.” Councilmember Reynolds asked what company would give the Village an updated estimate on a new replacement bridge, and Mr. Rutishauser replied that he would probably contact Contech Engineered Solutions, a design contractor firm, to see if they are interested in rendering an updated estimate. Councilmember Reynolds asked how much that would cost, and Mr. Rutishauser indicated that he would have to find out the price for doing so. Councilmember Reynolds remarked that she feels the overall price could be over $1 million to replace the bridge. Mr. Rutishauser said that she was probably correct, since the approaches to the bridge would have to be ADA compliant with switchback ramps to overcome the existing elevation. Replacing the bridge would be a bigger project than just repairing the bridge.

Mayor Vagianos agreed with Ms. Mailander’s recommendation that Mr. Rutishauser obtain an updated estimate for replacement of the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge, for comparison purposes with the costs for repairing the bridge. Councilmember Reynolds said that Mr. Rutishauser would first have to find out what Contech Engineered Solutions would charge the Village for an updated quote. Mr. Rutishauser said that he would find out. He is not sure whether this company has any interest in providing such an estimate or what their backlog is. If the work for the repairs are bid out as soon as possible, Mr. Rutishauser said he hoped to commence work on the bridge this year. More delays will shorten the amount of time work could be accomplished during the

construction season, before the colder weather begins. Working with cement or any cementitious product is problematic if it is done after November 15.

Mayor Vagianos assumed that since the Village does not presently have enough funds to pay for the repairs, there would need to be a special bond ordinance issued. Mr. Rutishauser agreed, and Ms. Mailander confirmed that this would need to be done.

Councilmember Weitz asked if there were any way RFPs could be sent out for both repairing and replacing the bridge. Mr. Rutishauser said that he would contact Contech Engineered Services, the vendor with whom he dealt in 2021, to get an updated price on replacing the bridge. He could also ask Lahita Engineering, who rendered the estimate for repairing the bridge, what their best estimate would be for a full replacement bridge.

Councilmember Winograd said that the Village should follow the recommendation of Lahita Engineering to send the bridge repairs out for bid, while concurrently having Mr. Rutishauser ask both Contech and Lahita for verbal estimates about how much they felt it would cost to replace the bridge in its entirety at this time. Mr. Rutishauser said that this could be done, but stated that bidding out this work will be a lot of work for bidders. Most bidders attempt to bid the lowest price so that they can obtain the work. He had a meeting today with a paving contractor who was expecting $3 million worth of work from the Village, but Mr. Rutishauser could only award him

$1 million worth of work because of financial constraints. He said that the contractor was “miffed” about not getting the full $3 million project and is contemplating whether or not he is going to sign the contract at all. If this vendor decides to walk away from the job, then Mr. Rutishauser would have to go to the second lowest responsible bidder which rendered a higher price for the work. This causes project delays.

Mayor Vagianos said that the point being raised by Mr. Rutishauser is whether or not the Village wants to increase the amount allocated in this year’s budget for bonded capital projects (usually around $7.5 million). The Village Councilmembers need to decide whether or not they want to exceed that amount this year or delay the bridge project for another year. He said that this must be decided before bids are solicited and received, given the example cited by Mr. Rutishauser. Mayor Vagianos remarked that several projects have already been put off until next year.

Ms. Mailander recommended that Mr. Rutishauser contact Contech Engineered Solutions, the firm which rendered the 2021 quote for replacement of the bridge, to find out if they will update the original quote. This matter could be placed on the agenda for the May 3, 2023 meeting for the Village Councilmembers to decide whether the bridge should be repaired or replaced and when they feel the work should commence. She said that when bidders submit a bid and are successful as the lowest responsible bidder, they expect to be awarded the full amount of the contract.

Over the years, Ms. Mailander has found that engineering estimates are usually pretty accurate, except for certain factors concerning supply chain issues and inflation. Ms. Mailander said that if the Village Councilmembers decide they want to go ahead with the repairs to the bridge, a bond would have to be issued for approximately $400,000.00. The costs could rise to $1 million if the Village Councilmembers decide that they wanted to replace the bridge entirely. She said that it was difficult to determine beforehand the amounts of the bids that would be received. She stated that funding should be made available before bids are received, so that the contract may be awarded right away. Mayor Vagianos agreed with Ms. Mailander’s recommendation, but cautioned everyone that issuing more bonds will place the Village in a precarious position.

3.     REALLOCATION OF CAPITAL FUNDS – WEST GLEN AVENUE SIDEWALKS

Ms. Mailander said that this item pertains to the reallocation of capital funds regarding the West Glen Avenue sidewalks. Councilmember Reynolds has recommended that the $500,000.00 allocated for the Schedler property in the proposed 2023 budget be reallocated so that a portion of the sidewalks could be constructed on West Glen Avenue. Mr. Rooney checked with the Village’s Bond Counsel. The wording in the pertinent Bond Ordinance is vague enough to allow the $500,000.00 to be allocated towards the sidewalk project, without having to completely rewrite and reapprove the Bond Ordinance.

Mr. Rutishauser said that he has reviewed the original design for the West Glen Avenue sidewalks, which involved the construction of a lot of retaining walls. There are considerable slopes on properties in the eastbound direction. Some already have retaining walls and some properties have developed their own parking spaces in front of their homes. During the process of obtaining estimates for this work with a retaining wall manufacturer, the cost was well over $1 million. A six-foot-wide sidewalk could be constructed, from the curbside inward away from the street. Other sidewalks already built along West Glen Avenue are four feet wide with a parkway strip along the road. With the sidewalk constructed right up against the curb, the sidewalk has to be a little bit wider, according to AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) standards. Grading and landscaping will need to be done and residents will be losing their parking spaces.

Mr. Rutishauser explained that there are some residents who are upset with what he has proposed. His preliminary estimate for constructing all of the sidewalks in the eastbound direction of West Glen Avenue, continuing from where they left off with sidewalk construction down to S. Hill, is approximately $300,000.00. Mr. Rutishauser emphasized to the Village Council that there are some property owners who desire sidewalks in the westbound direction, particularly near the area of the open ditch (which used to be 141 West Glen Avenue), but that ditch presents a conflict with the “Waters of the United States” portion of the Clean Water Act. These water areas can be found on a United States Geological Survey Map, delineated by a blue

line. Mr. Rutishauser described the configuration of the open ditch and pipes. Mr. Rutishauser had initially planned to install piping in that section, but he was told by the NJDEP that he could not do so. He said that putting a sidewalk over that open ditch would be an extremely difficult endeavor, with stream and buffer encroachments. That section will, unfortunately, always be without sidewalks.

Councilmember Reynolds said that there is currently a driveway which runs over the ditch. Mr. Rutishauser agreed, stating that culverts were installed. Councilmember Reynolds asked why the driveway would be allowed there, but a sidewalk would not be allowed. Mr. Rutishauser replied that the property owner went through the permitting process and were permitted to do so, because the previous home had that type of driveway access. However, when Mr. Rutishauser asked about installing a sidewalk along the entire frontage of that property and installing piping, he was told that he could not do so by the NJDEP.

Councilmember Reynolds said that there seemed to be a decent amount of space where a sidewalk could be installed, according to the pictures of that area, but the surrounding rocks would make it treacherous for someone to walk on. She asked Mr. Rutishauser if the rocks could be removed, then grade and mulch that area to at least allow for a walking path. Mr. Rutishauser replied that the mulch would disappear after the first rainstorm. While the area looks innocuous when there is no rain, there is a drainage area feeding into it (downstream pipe either 30” or 36” in diameter).

Mayor Vagianos asked about gravel, and Mr. Rutishauser replied that the gravel would wash away just as quickly during a rain event. Mayor Vagianos asked if there were any substance that could be used which would not be washed away and which would create a pathway, a substance other than concrete that is less expensive and would not require permitting. Mr. Rutishauser replied that this area is a stream bank and within the riparian buffer. He said that any other substance used would need to be approved by the NJDEP. He said that while mulch and gravel will wash away, the boulders have remained in place because of their weight.

Councilmember Reynolds asked Mr. Rutishauser about the sight obstruction if a car wanted to make a left-hand turn onto West Glen Avenue from S. Hill. Mr. Rutishauser replied that there are a couple of trees in that triangular corner piece that will be removed before constructing sidewalks. Councilmember Reynolds mentioned that the south side of the street by Heights Road is very wide, and she asked if there had been discussions about ways to narrow that street, such as with bump-outs in the crosswalk. Mr. Rutishauser said that he has not received any requests for a bump-out in that location, but he agreed with Councilmember Reynolds that there was a lot of “asphalt real estate” in that area. Elsewhere in the Village, he and his staff have put streets on a “road diet,” and he said that bump-outs could certainly be considered when it comes time to resurface Heights Road, similar to what was done on Grove Street (as it approaches the Saddle River) with a calming island in the center of the road to avoid motorist confusion.

Councilmember Reynolds asked Mr. Rutishauser if any grants could be obtained from Bergen County for safety improvements along West Glen Avenue, which is a County road. Mr. Rutishauser said that he could make an inquiry, but he doubted that any grants would be forthcoming. Councilmember Reynolds remarked that bump-outs would probably encourage drivers to drive a bit slower. Mr. Rutishauser agreed that bump-outs generally encourage slower speeds. Councilmember Reynolds asked how many feet of grass there is on the westbound side of West Glen Avenue, where sidewalks have already been constructed. Mr. Rutishauser said that he believed there were approximately 18 inches of parkway strip next to the sidewalk. He said that the “easy part” of the sidewalks was done previously. He strongly recommended that no trees be planted on the parkway strip, because it is too narrow and would eventually become a sight obstruction.

There was a discussion about the property owners who have carved out parking spaces in front of their homes on West Glen Avenue and how the construction of sidewalks will affect these parking spaces. If sidewalks are constructed, Mr. Rutishauser is concerned that these residents will begin parking on the sidewalk. He and his staff have to also contend with existing slopes and retaining walls near some properties. Belgian block curbs may have to be installed on the inside of the sidewalk to help with the “vertical difference.” When questioned by Councilmember Reynolds, Mr. Rutishauser said that they would have to see how the curbs hold up after several rainstorms, since there are some “2 to 1” slopes (steeper than what most people are comfortable mowing). They may have to look into planting pachysandra or other ground cover which would not need as much care as a lawn.

Councilmember Reynolds asked Mr. Rutishauser how many sidewalks could be constructed on the westbound side of West Glen Avenue (from Maple Avenue to Oak Street) if the $500,000.00 allocated to build a park at the Schedler property were reallocated towards the sidewalk project. Mr. Rutishauser replied that while this portion does not represent much of a horizontal distance, there are considerable vertical challenges. He said that many properties in that area rise up pretty quickly from the curbline. Mr. Rutishauser said that additional challenges and costs arise when attempting to make the sidewalks ADA accessible.

Councilmember Weitz asked about residents who would lose their parking spots once sidewalks were installed on the eastbound side. He wondered whether eminent domain would come into play. Mr. Rutishauser explained that these “parking spots” are on a public right-of-way and the residents have benefited over the years from using these right-of-ways, but they would lose that benefit once sidewalks were constructed.

Councilmember Winograd stated that she used to have to walk via West Glen Avenue to get to Sicilian Sun, where she used to work. She said that no one is denying that West Glen Avenue is a dangerous road and that there are very few routes which go from west to east. Councilmember

Winograd said that since she was elected to the Village Council, she has not viewed the plans for the West Glen Avenue sidewalks, and scant information was given to the Village Councilmembers during the budget hearings regarding the sidewalk project. She said that the project was not removed from the budget based upon the merits of the project, but rather based upon the amount requested ($1 million). Councilmember Winograd stated that there was no advocacy to the new Councilmembers for the sidewalk project and no plans for same were presented to them. She said that there was a $7.5 million threshold in the Capital Budget, and removing the sidewalk project was merely a financial decision.

Councilmember Winograd said that she reviewed the past improvements done along West Glen Avenue and was shocked to learn that the prior Village Council only spent a little less than

$100,000.00 for the sidewalks that were constructed. She stated that the verbal plans which were described to the Village Council related to a sidewalk which ended before Oak Street, describing it as a “sidewalk to nowhere.” Councilmember Winograd said that she does not have sidewalks in front of her house, and she and her neighbors have issues with the right-of-way, such as fire hydrants located on lawns. She said that she was confident that the designs could be modified in such a way that would please all of the residents. Councilmember Winograd suggested that the property owners be surveyed to see what they are willing to do or concede regarding their properties, so that the sidewalks may be constructed.

Councilmember Winograd said she has both walked and driven along West Glen Avenue. She stated that the existing crosswalks are long, and that longer crosswalks yield more pedestrian strikes. She said that she would like to see the project move forward in smaller increments. Councilmember Winograd also stated that she would like to see some traffic calming measures implemented along West Glen Avenue.

Councilmember Reynolds emphasized to Councilmember Winograd that the $500,000.00 allocation in the budget for the Schedler property would have to be reallocated by tomorrow evening when the final budget hearing and adoption will take place. Ms. Mailander said that the money does not need to be reallocated, but that the wording in the Bond Ordinance is vague enough so that the monies could be used for the sidewalk project without having to draw up any more paperwork. She said that the Village Councilmembers merely have to decide that they want the sidewalk project to proceed.

Councilmember Winograd asked for consensus from the other Village Councilmembers that the reason the $1 million request for the sidewalk project was cut from this year’s budget was for financial reasons only. Councilmember Reynolds replied that she never wanted to cut the sidewalk project from the budget. Councilmember Winograd reiterated that there was no advocacy for the sidewalk project, and Councilmember Reynolds disagreed.

Councilmember Weitz agreed with the comments made by Councilmember Winograd. He said that the Village Councilmembers were presented with a $1 million line item for the sidewalk project with “zero information” supporting it. He said that he only heard about the dangerous condition of West Glen Avenue after the budget hearings were held, when residents made public comments. This evening, for the first time, he heard that perhaps the sidewalk project could be done for $300,000.00, which is way less than the $1 million request. Councilmember Weitz said that if the Village Councilmembers had been provided with more information, they may have decided differently on this matter. He said that it would be foolish for the Village Council to make a decision this evening, in order to make tomorrow evening’s deadline for adopting the budget. He would like to be given some solid “numbers” of what it would cost to get the sidewalk project done. However, he feels uncomfortable just reallocating the $500,000.00 without knowing the specific details. Councilmember Weitz said that he agreed with Councilmember Winograd that more information should have been given to the Village Councilmembers by the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC) or from elsewhere way earlier than prior to the final budget hearing set for tomorrow.

Councilmember Winograd stated that the bloc of neighbors who are concerned about the sidewalks on West Glen Avenue should be kept in the loop through posting the proposed designs for the sidewalk construction on the Village website. She said that there are 13 County roads traversing Ridgewood (more than any other town in Bergen County), and the Village Councilmembers need to discuss how they are interfacing with the County. She again suggested that perhaps not all the sidewalks needed to be completed at once and that smaller segments could be completed, so that the project does not stall out entirely.

Councilmember Reynolds clarified that the previous sidewalk construction only cost

$100,000.00 because the “easy part” of the sidewalks was constructed, according to Mr. Rutishauser. At the present time, the “hard part” needs to be finished, but it will cost more because there are many factors to consider and challenges to be faced, such as existing slopes and retaining walls.

Mayor Vagianos asked for corroboration that the $1 million request from the Engineering Department in the budget was for the construction of sidewalks on the eastbound side of West Glen Avenue. Mr. Rutishauser replied in the affirmative. He added that there are some residents who live on the westbound side of West Glen Avenue who are also requesting sidewalks, but those properties present a different set of challenges. Mayor Vagianos asked what length of sidewalk was contemplated with the $1 million request. Mr. Rutishauser said that the length of the section was about 1,300 feet. He added that just for the retaining wall blocks themselves and their installation, it would cost $970,110.00. Mayor Vagianos asked Mr. Rutishauser if he could construct 1,300 feet of sidewalk for $300,000.00 without retaining walls, and Mr. Rutishauser replied that he could do so through the use of landscaping techniques and grading.

Regarding the carved-out parking spaces on the eastbound side of West Glen, Mayor Vagianos asked if those spaces would be lost once the sidewalk and retaining walls are constructed. Mr. Rutishauser said that those spaces would actually be preserved through the use of retaining walls. His goal was not to encumber too much of the residential properties, so that the parking spaces could be preserved, and that is why he requested $1 million. Without preserving the parking spaces, he said that he could construct 1,300 feet of sidewalks along West Glen Avenue for

$300,000.00. The residents would have driveway access, but they would no longer be able to park parallel to West Glen Avenue. Mayor Vagianos said that, according to his rough math calculations, 300 linear feet of sidewalk could be constructed for $100,000.00. Mr. Rutishauser said that it depends upon what is involved to construct the sidewalks. If it were just the construction of a sidewalk, it could be less. Retaining walls, grading, tree removals, fence removals and relocations, and excavation add to the cost. Mr. Rutishauser said that it costs approximately $70 per square yard of sidewalk. Current bids indicate that the cost may be closer to $78 or $80 per square yard.

Mayor Vagianos said that he would be amenable to reallocating the amount of $100,000.00 to build 400 feet of sidewalk, with no retaining walls, so that the project can keep moving forward. He agreed with Councilmember Winograd’s prior statement that the Village Councilmembers had to reduce the original figure of $12 million for capital projects down to $7.5 million. He stated that the $1 million request for the sidewalk construction was much larger than what was spent in the past for sidewalk construction on West Glen Avenue. He asked for the opinions of the other Village Councilmembers.

Both Councilmember Reynolds and Ms. Mailander asked if 400 feet of sidewalk would only cover the frontage of one or two houses. Mr. Rutishauser stated that it would cover several houses at the more westerly end of West Glen Avenue where they had stopped construction. Ms. Mailander wondered about the quality of bids received, if the bid included only 400 feet of sidewalk, or whether the bids would be more economical if a further length of sidewalk were included in the bid. Mr. Rutishauser said that he would not bid this project out, but would merely utilize a Change Order for the existing paving contractor.

Councilmember Reynolds reminded everyone that the sum of $500,000.00 could be reallocated towards the sidewalk project. She stated that the Schedler property was more important to the other Village Councilmembers than safety. Mayor Vagianos denied this and stated that the Schedler project has languished for 14 years and the Village Council has an opportunity to complete it. Councilmember Reynolds stated that nothing is going to happen with the Schedler property in 2023, citing potential lawsuits. Mayor Vagianos said that at least part of the sidewalk project could be completed for $100,000.00 and that further monies could be set aside in the next two to three years, so that the project can finally be completed.

Councilmember Reynolds asked if Mayor Vagianos has actually walked along West Glen Avenue, and Mayor Vagianos said that he has. Councilmember Reynolds said that 400 feet of sidewalk would create a “sidewalk to nowhere” and would not help anyone. She said that Village taxpayers are going to be paying on the $500,000.00 bond allocated for the Schedler property, when no work will be done on that property this year and the money will not be used. She highly recommended that these funds be used in 2023 for the sidewalks, and next year when the Village has more money, the Village Council can allocate monies towards the Schedler property.

Councilmember Weitz felt that it was disingenuous of Councilmember Reynolds to “pick” on the Schedler property, stating that a lot of money has been allocated towards various projects in the Village. He alleged that Councilmember Reynolds wanted to pull the money away from the Schedler property because she was against the approved plans for the property. He asked Councilmember Reynolds, as Council Liaison for CSAC, why the sidewalk project was not completed when she sat on the prior Village Council and they had the benefit of Covid relief funds. He said that Councilmember Reynolds should stop trying to “gain political points” and concentrate on the matters at hand.

Councilmember Reynolds denied that she was attempting to gain political ground and stated that she felt it was a waste of money to allocate funds towards a project that will not be completed in 2023. The residents have been paying for the $1.9 million which was previously bonded for the Schedler property. Councilmember Reynolds said that she did not hear about the new sidewalk plan until two weeks ago, when she was informed of it by Councilmember Winograd. If she had known about it, she would have brought it up during the budget meetings. She did not know that there was another option and thought that the retaining walls absolutely had to be built.

Councilmember Winograd stated that a lot of money was cut from the budget for new garbage trucks and other vehicles and equipment. She feels that the sidewalk project needs to move forward, but she is not sure that $100,000.00 is enough. She added that she is committed to doing work on West Glen Avenue this year, when the scope of work is further defined. Councilmember Winograd stated that the prior Village Council and the present Village Council have been “pumping” money into the Schedler property for the past five years with no return on that investment. She said that the Zabriskie-Schedler house renovations will be completed by June of this year and that people were already talking about holding a celebration. Councilmember Winograd said that it was unfair to pit one capital project against another. She suggested that perhaps the Board of Education could become involved in the sidewalk project, since West Glen Avenue is included in the Safe Routes to School project.

Mayor Vagianos said that it was Councilmember Winograd’s idea to move ahead with the West Glen Avenue sidewalk project without constructing retaining walls, which changed the numbers drastically. He asked Ms. Mailander if a decision needed to be made this evening about the sidewalk project, since the $500,000.00 has already been allocated in the budget, and Ms.

Mailander confirmed that no decision needed to be made this evening. However, she stated that Mr. Rutishauser cannot move forward with the sidewalk design until such a decision has been made. She said that the way the Bond Ordinance was written allows the Village Council to use some, or all, of the $500,000.00 towards the West Glen Avenue sidewalk project.

Mayor Vagianos suggested that perhaps Mr. Rutishauser could put together some detailed plans that could be reviewed by the Village Council, after which time the Village Councilmembers could decide how much money they wanted to allocate towards the sidewalk project. He said that the last time any money was allocated towards the sidewalk project on West Glen Avenue was seven years ago.

Deputy Mayor Perron indicated that she would support partial construction of the West Glen sidewalks. At the same time, as suggested by a resident, she asked if someone could check to make sure that there were a sufficient number of speed limit signs on West Glen Avenue. Councilmember Reynolds remarked that she did not think any amount of speed limit signs would aid in slowing down drivers on that road. She said that sidewalks, however, do help to calm speeding traffic.

Councilmember Winograd asked if the Village Councilmembers wanted her to approach the Board of Education to see if they could assist financially with the West Glen Avenue sidewalks, since it is one of the Safe Routes to School. She said that it was important for the Village Council to investigate alternate sources of funding.

Mayor Vagianos asked Mr. Rutishauser if he could draw up some detailed plans for the sidewalks, without retaining walls, along with estimated costs, that could be reviewed by the Village Councilmembers, in time for the meeting scheduled for May 3, 2023. Mr. Rutishauser said that he would do so as soon as possible, but it probably would not be in time for the May 3, 2023 meeting.

Councilmember Reynolds stated that she thought Mr. Rutishauser already had such plans drawn up, and Mr. Rutishauser stated that it was only a working drawing. Councilmember Reynolds asked Mr. Rutishauser how many linear feet of sidewalks were constructed in 2022. Mr. Rutishauser said that he would have to look up that information. Councilmember Reynolds said that she would like to give a commitment of more than 400 feet of sidewalk to the Village residents. A “sidewalk to nowhere” would not prevent school children from walking in the street and there would be no connection to other portions of the sidewalks already constructed.

4.     AWARD CONTRACT – SECOND TREATMENT OF EMERALD ASH BORER INSECTICIDE

Ms. Mailander stated that this item pertains to the awarding of a contract for the second treatment of the emerald ash borer insecticide. To date, 107 large ash trees have been removed through an outside contractor, and 256 ash trees have been removed by the Shade Tree crew. The Village initially treated 173 ash trees with systematic insecticide, and these trees are now due for a second application treatment. The Parks and Recreation Department sent this job out for bid, and it is recommended that this contract be awarded to Bartlett Tree Experts of Waldwick, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $13,446.00. Funding is in the Capital Budget.

Councilmember Reynolds asked if the 173 trees which were initially treated survived, and Ms. Mailander replied in the affirmative. Councilmember Reynolds asked if it was expected that these trees would survive after the second insecticide treatment, and Mr. Rutishauser replied that they are cautiously optimistic that the insecticide will work successfully.

Deputy Mayor Perron asked why the quote from Barlett Tree Experts indicate that only 161 trees will receive a second insecticide treatment. Mr. Rutishauser said that he didn’t know, since he did not prepare the bid. Deputy Mayor Perron felt that perhaps some of the 173 trees initially treated had died. Ms. Mailander said that she will find out the answer to this question.

5.     SEWER FEES FOR SIGNIFICANT DISCHARGERS

Mayor Vagianos indicated that he was recusing himself from this matter, although he wasn’t sure whether he needed to or not, since he owns a business which is a significant discharger.

Ms. Mailander explained that this item pertains to sewer fees for significant dischargers. The Village has an ordinance that establishes a fee structure based upon equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) for commercial/industrial minor and significant dischargers to the Village’s sanitary sewage collection system. Nonprofit and tax-exempt properties are billed for the sewage treatment services they receive. The 2022 rate was at $4.45 per 1,000 gallons of flow in excess of 109,500 gallons per year discharged from commercial properties, as measured by water meter consumption during the two winter quarters. Nonprofits are billed from the first gallon of water they consume. After examining operating costs, as well as the cost of living increase rate, Mr. Rutishauser is recommending that the rate for 2023 be increased to $4.70 per 1,000 gallons.

6.     AWARD SOLE SOURCE CONTRACT – LUCAS CPR DEVICES AND ACCESSORIES – FIRE DEPARTMENT

Ms. Mailander explained that this matter pertains to the awarding of a Sole Source Contract for the purchase of two LUCAS devices, with accessories, six batteries and an additional carrying case to replace one that broke for the Fire Department. A LUCAS device is a mechanical chest compression device used to provide chest compressions during CPR. It provides continuous and consistent compressions to patients in cardiac arrest. Not only does this improve care to the

patient, but it has also greatly reduces injuries to first responders, especially during transport. These new LUCAS devices will replace the two LUCAS devices that are currently at their end of life. It is recommended that this contract be awarded to Stryker Medical of Chicago, Illinois, in an amount not to exceed $34,971.72. Funding is contained in the Capital Budget for the Fire Department.

Councilmember Winograd thought that the Village Council recently bonded for the purchase of a LUCAS device in January 2023. Ms. Mailander replied that these two LUCAS device purchases are related to the bond approved in January. Councilmember Winograd asked if the Fire Department always has two LUCAS devices on hand, and Deputy Mayor Perron replied that two are needed for different ambulances.

7.     AWARD CONTRACT UNDER STATE CONTRACT – TIRES – FLEET SERVICES

Ms. Mailander explained that this item pertains to the awarding of a contract under State contract for the purchase of tires for Fleet Services. It is recommended that the contract be awarded to Hudson Tire Exchange of Hackensack, New Jersey, and Custom Bandag of Linden, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $80,000.00. Funding is in the Fleet Services Operating Budget.

8.     AWARD CONTRACT UNDER STATE CONTRACT – BULLETPROOF VESTS AND RELATED LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL ITEMS

Ms. Mailander stated that this item pertains to the awarding of a contract under State contract for the purchase of bulletproof vests and related law enforcement personnel items. It is recommended that this contract be awarded to Lawman Supply of New Jersey, of Pennsauken, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $75,000.00. Funding is in the Police Capital Budget and from a grant.

9.     AWARD CONTRACT EXTENSION – POLICE VEHICLES LEASE

Ms. Mailander explained that this item pertains to the awarding of a contract extension (first year of a three-year contract) under Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing for the leasing and maintenance of six administrative, detective and traffic van vehicles through Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc., of Wayne, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $130,000.00. Funding is in the Police Department Operating Account.

Deputy Mayor Perron asked if these vehicles were specially equipped. Ms. Mailander said that the vehicles are equipped with interior lights, heavy duty suspension, and the like. Deputy Mayor Perron asked if this lease was ongoing. Ms. Mailander replied that the Police Department has

been leasing these vehicles from Enterprise for the past five or six years. Deputy Mayor Perron then asked if anyone had looked into leasing hybrid vehicles, since she feels that this is the direction in which the Village should be headed. Ms. Mailander said she would find out.

10.    AWARD YEAR TWO CONTRACT – CCTV/ACCESS CONTROL/ LICENSING FEES

Ms. Mailander explained that this item pertains to the awarding of year two of a two-year contract, under the National Cooperative Purchasing Alliance, for service licensing fees for the Police Department’s current CCTV, Access Control, Automatic License Plate Readers, and Panic Alarm System. It is recommended that this contract be renewed with Secure Watch 24 of Moonachie, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $50,726.00 for two years. In addition, a contract for Genetec licensing fees, which covers all cameras and doors on the network, including the Parking Garage and Water Department buildings, is recommended, at a cost not to exceed $7,390.28. Funding is contained in the Police Department Operating Budget.

11.    REBID OF TRAIN STATION COFFEE BAR AT RIDGEWOOD TRAIN STATION

Ms. Mailander stated that this matter deals with the rebid of the coffee bar at the Ridgewood Train Station Building. This was the second time this has gone out to bid. No bids were received. There is a resolution to acknowledge that no bids were received and to permit the Village to negotiate for a prospective concession operator for the Train Station in accordance with N.J.S.A. 40A:11-5. The intent of the bid was to obtain a vendor to operate a concession stand at the Train Station, as was done before the pandemic.

12.    AWARD CONTRACT UNDER STATE CONTRACT – PICK-UP TRUCK RENTALS FOR POLICE

Ms. Mailander explained that this matter pertains to the awarding of a contract under Sourcewell State Contract for pickup truck rentals from United Rentals of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey. This contract is not to exceed $28,000.00. This allows the Police Department to rent two pickup trucks, to be used primarily for construction details. The contract includes maintenance of the vehicles. During construction season, the Police Department does not have enough vehicles to cover all construction details (such as for PSE&G and Altice jobs). The pickup trucks also allow the Police Department to carry larger materials, such as traffic cones and barricades, without storage issues.

C.                 POLICY

1.     AUTHORIZE BROOK CLEAN-UP – TEMPLE ISRAEL

Ms. Mailander explained that this item deals with the authorization of a brook cleanup near Temple Israel along the Dunham Trail. The Village provides the tools and safety equipment for them to borrow, and this has been approved by the Village Engineer. Deputy Mayor Perron asked when this cleanup would take place. Mr. Rutishauser replied that one cleanup has already been performed, and there are two other dates being contemplated for further cleanup.

7.                   PUBLIC COMMENTS

Saurabh Dani, 390 Bedford Road, thanked the Village Councilmembers for discussing the West Glen Avenue sidewalks and the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge this evening. He said that he was speaking in his personal capacity. He said that the Safe Routes to School program is a municipal responsibility and derives from the municipal budget. It does not come from school budgets. The crossing guards are provided by the municipal government. When he lived in Secaucus, he was at a similar meeting where there was a discussion about no sidewalks. The Secaucus School District determined that children needed to be bused, if the distance from the children’s homes to the school was less than two miles. The cost for this busing was charged back to the municipal government. Therefore, Mr. Dani feels that Village residents need to approach the Board of Education and request busing for their children. In the alternative, additional crossing guards should be provided to enhance safety, until the sidewalk project on West Glen Avenue is completed. He thanked the Village Council for at least partially funding the construction of sidewalks this year on West Glen Avenue.

Mr. Dani asked for an explanation of the $7.5 million cap on capital improvements. He asked why the bond could not be for $7.7 million. He asked whether this cap was required by statute or whether it was a limit set by the Village. Regarding ADA accessibility on the West Glen Avenue sidewalks, Mr. Dani stated that Bergen County Commissioner Ramon Hache stated that the Village has not provided curb cuts for a lot of County roads. Until those curb cuts are provided, the County will not repave the County roads. If the sidewalks constructed along West Glen Avenue are not ADA compliant with curb cuts, then in the future the County may not repave West Glen Avenue until the curb cuts are installed.

Mr. Dani thanked Councilmember Weitz for answering some of his budget questions. However, he said that he was still not clear about the Covid relief funds received by the Village. He understands that these funds were used to cover loss of revenues and additional expenses incurred during the Covid pandemic. However, he said that the Village should now be at a “pre- Covid expenses” level, and he doesn’t understand what expenses have increased this year to warrant such a high municipal tax increase. Mr. Dani said that any increase in healthcare expenses should be offset by Governor Murphy’s pledge to fund $200 million towards healthcare increases incurred by municipal governments, which he said should be passed in July of this

year. He recalled that the State reimbursed the Ridgewood Board of Education for healthcare insurance increases three or four years ago.

Rurik Halaby, 1 Franklin Avenue, said that part of the problem with the West Glen Avenue sidewalks is that the Village “dropped the ball” when the Village was given the opportunity by New Jersey Transit to come up with a plan to widen Glenwood Avenue, with New Jersey Transit being responsible for maintenance of that street. He said that a lot of traffic has been diverted to West Glen Avenue, making the traffic problem worse.

Addressing Councilmember Reynolds, Mr. Halaby said that her previous comment (about Mayor Vagianos preferring to spend money on the Schedler property rather than on safety projects) was a “cheap shot.” He asked Councilmember Reynolds where she has been the last four years when

$2.6 million was spent on the “crummy” Schedler house. Mr. Halaby said that he attended a multitude of meetings during those years and heard no comments whatsoever about the sidewalks on West Glen Avenue.

Mr. Halaby said that when he used to complain about Franklin Avenue not being paved, he would always receive a reply that the Village was “waiting on the County.” However, he spoke with a representative from Bergen County at that time and was told that they were “waiting on the Village” to finish the curbs and ramps before they would resurface Franklin Avenue.

Mr. Halaby said that he sent a letter to Bergen County asking when the traffic lights at Maple Avenue, Franklin Avenue, and Oak Street would be redone. The County responded by saying, “Please note that the traffic signals are not under County jurisdiction, and the Village of Ridgewood plays a major role in the development and advancement of their projects. The County, unfortunately, is not able to advance a project without the involvement of the Village. As the 2023 administration settles in, I’m sure that they will consider and evaluate all prospective projects that they deem essential to potentially undertake.” He suggested that the Village Councilmembers sit down with Ms. Mailander and Mr. Rutishauser and find out what needs to be done by the Village on County roads, so that the County roads can be repaved.

Niti Mistry, 416 Colwell Court, thanked Councilmember Reynolds for being such a great advocate for concerned residents of Ridgewood. She said that she appreciates the Village Council’s willingness to revisit the sidewalk project on West Glen Avenue and committing to some type of progress on the project this year. However, Ms. Mistry said that Councilmember Reynolds was correct in saying that even doing a little bit of the sidewalks will result in a “sidewalk to nowhere,” with no connectivity, and will not make anyone safer. Ms. Mistry said that she is annoyed that the most dangerous part of West Glen Avenue still has no sidewalks, although some sidewalk sections have been constructed.

Ms. Mistry feels that the entire project can be completed for the sum of $300,000.00. However,  if only a certain section can be done this year, Ms. Mistry asked if Mr. Rutishauser could begin the sidewalks by S. Hill, because that is the most dangerous part. She said that near 172 West Glen Avenue, when one looks towards S. Hill, there is no shoulder to walk on whatsoever, on either side. Ms. Mistry acknowledged that a retaining wall may be needed near that section, since it is on a very big hill. She said that people or children walking on the sidewalks that are there have nowhere to go when the sidewalk ends, except to walk onto the street.

Ms. Mistry said that she doesn’t care about the politics in the Village or “who did what” on the prior Village Council. She is merely concerned that safety on West Glen Avenue be enhanced, so that no one gets hurt. She mentioned that the current Village Council is “divided” about big projects, such as the Schedler property. However, everyone agrees that safety is compromised on West Glen Avenue without sidewalks. She urged the Village Councilmembers to put their energies towards something they all agree on.

Cynthia O’Keefe, 542 West Saddle River Road, said that she was glad that safety concerns are finally being addressed by the Village Council. Even though the Village Council voted to approve the large turf field on the Schedler property on April 12, 2023, Ms. O’Keefe said that she will continue attending every meeting to address her concerns regarding the development of the Schedler property, until her concerns are addressed. She does not feel that any of the residents in the Schedler community have had their concerns addressed. Ms. O’Keefe said that a comment made at a prior meeting, that the Schedler property could have become a 7-11, was insulting.

Ms. O’Keefe said that she just found out today that the Village is thinking of purchasing the property across the street from her house. She heard it through a group chat, since it was not disclosed to the public. She said that it was unfathomable how little transparency there is in the Village. Ms. O’Keefe has a private well, which is used for her water source, and she will be worried about contamination every day after the turf field is installed at the Schedler property. She has to worry about safety, and questioned what would happen if the Village buys the property across the street from her house. She said that there are no sidewalks there and that people will have to walk in the street, with cars speeding 65 miles per hour off Route 17.

Ms. O’Keefe said that all of the Councilmembers can go home and rest their heads on their pillows, but Ms. O’Keefe and her neighbors have to worry about what is being done to the Schedler property every single day. She said that there is no two-way dialogue with the Village Council, only a one-way conversation. She said that the Village Councilmembers approved the plans for the Schedler property (except for Councilmember Reynolds and Deputy Mayor Perron) and ignored all of the information given to them about the dangers of PFAS. David Refken, a Village resident, asked to meet with the Village Councilmembers to discuss scientific data on the dangers of PFAS, but he never heard back from anyone.

Ms. O’Keefe said that the lack of information and transparency is taking an emotional toll on a lot of residents. She said that the residents are divided and being pitted against each other. She said that the residents in the Schedler community have valid concerns about the trees and air quality, just like the residents who live near West Glen Avenue have concerns about the sidewalks. She said that there are many people serving on committees and offering recommendations that are ignored by the Village Council.

Jacqueline Hone, 30 Carriage Lane, said that one of her biggest concerns is that she and other residents attend Village Council meetings and committee meetings, yet there is a lot of misinformation. She said that Councilmember Winograd commented that people were talking about having a celebration once the Zabriskie-Schedler house renovations are completed. However, someone actually asked if there would be a celebration when and if the house is completed. Ms. Hone said it was only one person asking the question, yet Councilmember Winograd made it seem like there was a whole group of people talking about it.

Ms. Hone said that Matt Rossi, who spoke previously, said that “neighbors” asked for the acquisition of the Schedler properties, yet it was only one person who advocated for the acquisition of that property. Regarding the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge, Ms. Hone said that she has heard it mentioned that many neighbors are advocating for the repair of the pedestrian footbridge, yet Ms. Hone believes that it is only one or two people who ask that this project be completed, week after week. In addition, sports representatives have appeared before the Village Council saying that they are speaking on behalf of their 1,700+ members, yet Ms. Hone said that unless those members have signed a document saying that they can be represented by the sports association representative, she does not give any validity to those statements. The same thing is occurring with the West Glen Avenue sidewalks, when four people state that they are representing the entire neighborhood.

Ms. Hone said that there is a stark contrast between the amount of people voicing concerns in the above matters and those expressing concerns about the Schedler property development. There  are not only one or two residents who are speaking before the Village Council concerning the Schedler property, but rather more than 200 individuals who sent signed letters to the Village Council stating their concerns. Despite this, Ms. Hone accused the Village Council of paying attention to the sports people, footbridge people, sidewalk people and sports representatives, while ignoring the multitude of people sharing their concerns about the Schedler property and the scientific data presented, which warns of the dangers of PFAS.

Ms. Hone emphasized that there are valid and proven concerns regarding air pollution, noise pollution, traffic and safety, yet the Village Councilmembers refuse to heed these concerns month after month. She said that the Village Councilmembers can “carpet” as much of the Schedler property as they want, as long as they attempt to mitigate the impact the turf field and

razing of trees will have upon the residents living in the Schedler community, through the use of expert studies. Ms. Hone questioned why there was such gross negligence and deliberate and intentional disregard for these residents. She said that these residents deserve answers, just as the people speaking about the sidewalks and footbridge have received answers.

Boyd A. Loving, 342 South Irving Street, noted that whenever the previous Village Council is mentioned, all heads on the dais turn to Councilmember Reynolds. For the record, Mr. Loving stated that Deputy Mayor Perron and Mayor Vagianos both served on the prior Village Council along with Councilmember Reynolds. Mayor Vagianos, then Councilmember, took office in November of 2021. Mr. Loving said that attention should not be cast solely on Councilmember Reynolds when someone mentions the previous Village Council.

Mr. Loving said that there were some comments this evening about the use of social media. Mr. Rogers gave his opinions regarding the Facebook pages of Mayor Vagianos and Councilmember Winograd. Mr. Loving stated that he felt there was no difference between “blocking” members and “hiding” comments on social media, both of which he stated were unacceptable and unlawful. He said that Mr. Rogers’ comments led him to conclude that there was some admission that this blocking or hiding took place. Mr. Loving said that comments were also made regarding a heavily censored and regulated Facebook page, on which discussions about official municipal business were taking place. Mr. Rogers opined that this was not illegal, since this was not a page controlled by Councilmember Winograd as administrator. However, Mr. Loving felt that there were some ethical and moral issues involved with such discussions on that Facebook page.

Mr. Loving said that he took great offense to comments made this evening that the public should have been aware that the Village Council was thinking about purchasing 510 West Saddle River Road near the Schedler property, since the Village Council is always seeking to acquire property adjacent to parkland. He said that these comments were totally uncalled for and unacceptable.

Mr. Loving mentioned that there was also a comment made this evening, concerning the West Glen Avenue sidewalks, that it is better to do projects in “small chunks” rather than the entire project all at once. He wondered why it was not acceptable to do the Schedler project in incremental steps. Mr. Loving stated that comments such as this insult the intelligence of the public. He said that he agreed with the statement that doing only a portion of the sidewalks will create a “sidewalk to nowhere,” which he stated made no sense to him.

Mr. Loving said that at the Village Council meeting which took place two weeks ago, he noted that Mayor Vagianos was going to close public comments without checking to see if there were any people waiting to make comments virtually. He said that Mayor Vagianos needs to check his computer to make sure that there are no more people waiting to make public comments via Zoom.

Regarding some comments made this evening by Ms. Mailander about irrigation restrictions, Mr. Loving reminded everyone that residents with Smart Controllers can still water seven days per week. He stated that he had opposed this inequity from the beginning, but that he will revisit this matter at a later date.

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that she agreed with her husband that blocking members and hiding comments on social media are the same thing. She stated that it was merely a matter of semantics and does not represent transparency. The hiding of comments was intentional and basically amounted to censorship. Mr. Rogers indicated this evening that Ms. Loving had accepted his response regarding Councilmember Winograd’s Facebook activity. However, Ms. Loving said that she had not accepted his response and, in fact, sent a detailed point-by-point rebuttal to Mr. Rogers. Mr. Rogers agreed with Ms. Loving.

Ms. Loving stated that Councilmember Winograd has absolute control over where and what she posts on social media. She said that Councilmember Winograd is participating as an elected official on a censored Facebook page. She said that in the middle of discussions, people are cut off from commenting further. Ms. Loving said that the ACLU clearly prohibits such actions and states that elected officials must participate in online discussions that are open to everyone, not just to a select few. Ms. Loving stated that Village business cannot be discussed on Councilmember Winograd’s personal Facebook page (“Winograd2022”).

On April 6, 2023, Ms. Loving made an OPRA (Open Public Records Act) request for one post from Mayor Vagianos’s Facebook page, which she stated was part of the public domain since it is his official Mayor page. The Village Clerk’s Office has seven business days to respond to an OPRA request, and April 17 represented the seventh business day. However, on April 18th, Ms. Loving was told that there would be an extension of her request to April 25th. On April 26th, she was told that there would be another extension to May 9th, which represents an additional 16 days above what is legally allowed. Ms. Loving stated that she spoke with Eileen Young, Deputy Village Clerk, who was very gracious and told Ms. Loving that the document had not yet been received. The only two legitimate reasons for not supplying requested records would be if the requested item was in storage or was being currently used. Therefore, Ms. Loving said that the Village is in violation of OPRA by not providing her with the requested information. She accused Mayor Vagianos of “running a ship” that is censoring and controlling the public, and cautioned him that he needs to straighten up and follow the law.

Robin Fisher, 412 North Monroe Street, said that the sidewalk project on West Glen Avenue has been ongoing for the past ten years. While she appreciates the discussion this evening about the sidewalks, she asked the Village Councilmembers to “put your money where your mouth is.” She understands that the entire $500,000.00 bonded for the Schedler property cannot all be used for the sidewalks, and she appreciates Mayor Vagianos suggesting that part of that money be used for the sidewalk construction. Ms. Fisher said that she agreed with Ms. Mistry’s prior

comments that if only a portion of the sidewalks can be constructed this year, that it should be the portion of West Glen Avenue where it intersects with S. Hill and Wastena Terrace. She stated that she was in favor of allocating $300,000.00 towards the sidewalks over three years, if not the entire $500,000.00.

Ms. Fisher stated that the sidewalk construction is a patchwork of areas with sidewalks and some areas without sidewalk. There are portions of West Glen Avenue with sidewalks on both sides of the street, and some without any sidewalks at all. Ms. Fisher urged the Village Council to approve flashing pedestrian lights to alert drivers of pedestrians crossing the road, especially at the dangerous curve near Wastena Terrace. She also agreed that more speed limit signs need to be installed along West Glen Avenue, although she doubted whether those signs would actually slow down traffic. Ms. Fisher added that the parking spots carved out in front of residents’ homes on West Glen Avenue are encroaching on the public right-of-way and pose dangers to children walking along the road. She urged the Village Council to “take back” that right-of-way and construct the sidewalks that are needed to enhance safety.

Suzanne Ruane, 705 Kingsbridge Lane, said that she wanted to remind the Village Councilmembers that there are no sidewalks on East Saddle River Road. Therefore, if the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge is replaced and made wheelchair accessible (ADA compliant), the wheelchair-bound people will be forced to go onto East Saddle River Road and fight traffic, since there are no sidewalks. She said that the Village Council sought out an engineering firm to repair the bridge, since it did not make sense to replace the bridge (which would have required that it be made wheelchair accessible). Ms. Ruane stated that an additional $30,000.00 is needed to repair the footbridge (between what has already been allocated and the engineering estimate). She urged the Village Council to move quickly on the project to repair the footbridge.

Ms. Ruane asked if the public would be notified of what transpired at the Closed Session this evening regarding the acquisition of the land adjacent to the Schedler property or whether residents would have to file OPRA requests.

Leo Ruane, 705 Kingsbridge Lane, said that the footbridge on East Saddle River Road has been closed for almost four years, which is a long time for the “neglected” eastside community to be without. Residents are forced to take dangerous alternate routes to go into town, and some children have been hit by cars while bicycling on these alternate routes. Mr. Ruane urged the Village Council to complete the repairs on the Kingsbridge Lane Bridge to enhance the safety of the children residing in that community. He invited the Village Councilmembers to visit the bridge so that they can see that making the bridge ADA compliant is ridiculous, since there are no sidewalks along East Saddle River Road and wheelchair-bound residents using the bridge have nowhere to go, except into the street.

Mr. Ruane said that he has heard the term “Schedler Park,” but feels that this is a misnomer and that the park should be called “Schedler Sports Complex.” He said that the land will not look like a park with a huge sports field.

Mary Lou Handy, 695 Kingsbridge Lane, said that the buzzword for this evening is “safety.” She lives a few feet away from the Kingsbridge Lane Footbridge, which has been out of commission for four years. She has five children and they can no longer use the footbridge. In addition, there are residents who live on East Saddle River Road who cannot use the footbridge to visit the Schedler property. The residents in that area moved to Ridgewood with the knowledge that the footbridge provided access to other areas in Ridgewood, and now they do not have that access other than through dangerous alternative routes, such as the overpass leading to the Park and Ride on Route 17. Ms. Handy said that there was no safe way for people to walk from the overpass to get to the CBD.

Ms. Handy remarked that the cross-country team at Ridgewood High School runs through the Kingsbridge neighborhood, and they climb over the barricades on the footbridge every day and continue to run along East Saddle River Road, which has no sidewalks. Ms. Handy stated that it did not make sense to make the bridge ADA compliant, since someone in a wheelchair crossing over the bridge will have nowhere to go except onto busy East Saddle River Road. She urged the Village Council to complete the renovations to the bridge as quickly as possible.

Kevin Wang, 147 West Glen Avenue, said that he appreciated the fact that the Village Councilmembers spoke about pedestrian safety this evening, as well as the West Glen Avenue sidewalks. He said that the sidewalks which have already been constructed on West Glen Avenue have brought significant improvements to the lives of the residents who live there. He said that while riding a bicycle on West Glen Avenue in the past before the sidewalks were constructed, he was always very scared by the cars zooming by. However, he said that he felt safer by being able to ride on the sidewalks which were constructed.

Mr. Wang said that he works in New York City, and when he returns home after work, he doesn’t want to feel as though he never left the city with the busy traffic. Mr. Wang urged all of the Village Councilmembers to walk along West Glen Avenue so that they can understand what residents are experiencing every day. Mr. Wang added that the residents who live in the West Glen Avenue neighborhood are more than willing to work with the Village and Bergen County to make this road as safe as possible by completing the sidewalk project.

There were no further public comments.

8.                   RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

Deputy Village Clerk Eileen Young read Resolution #23-154 to go into Closed Session: