Village Council Work Session 20151007

A REGULAR WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY ON OCTOBER 7, 2015.

1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

Mayor Aronsohn called the meeting to order at 7:33 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call, the following were present: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn. Also present were Roberta Sonenfeld, Village Manager; Heather Mailander, Village Clerk; and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney. Mayor Aronsohn led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and asked for a moment of silence in honor of the American men and women serving in our Armed Forces, as well as those serving as first responders.

1. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Aronsohn asked if there were any comments or questions from the public.

Michelle Italia, 3 Betty Court, read a letter from Ridgewood resident Jacqueline Hone. The letter stated that applications were filed on 9/8/15, and 9/16/15, to obtain approximately $2 million in Open Space grants from Bergen County. Ms. Hone wrote that these applications were completed with intentional omissions, misleading information, and without municipal endorsement, or public notification as required. This matter was dismissed by the Village Manager and Village Council at a previous meeting. The Village Manager claimed that submission of incomplete applications to Bergen County is both common practice, and acceptable. Ms. Hone wrote that these applications are fraudulent, and were submitted with the intent to receive funds. If the facts were known, the site plan for Schedler would be a violation of County and State provisions, and she indicated that the Village should not proceed with the Schedler plan.

Ms. Hone stated that the Village Manager submitted an application on 9/1/15, seeking $100,000 of Bergen County Open Space funds. This application was submitted with blatant, intentional, false and misleading information, without Council endorsement and public notification. This application demonstrates that the Village Manager committed $100,000 of municipal funds, or taxpayer money without Village Council approval. Ms. Hone asked what authority the Village Manager has to authorize or commit taxpayer money without the Village Council’s approval. When confronted with this question, the Village Manager stated that $100,000 would eventually come from the Ridgewood Baseball Softball Association (RBSA) via a gift donation; however; since the RBA money has yet to be received municipal funds were allocated in its place. Ms. Hone questioned again what authority the Village Manager has that allows her to front taxpayer money, and act as a temporary lender for the RBSA. This accounting method constitutes co-mingling of funds, which is prohibited. Ms. Hone asked why this preferential treatment wasn’t extended to the Friends of the Historic Zabriskie-Schedler House. She noted that land use restriction contains strict provisions concerning open space and historic preservation, full disclosure of threatened wildlife, vegetation, and environmental impacts. The development of the Schedler property would have strict limitations, regulated land use, and mandated historic wildlife and vegetation preservation.

Ms. Hone pointed out that the initial open space application used to acquire the Schedler property stated that the land would be used 60/40 active recreational, without lights. It was under this plan that the Village was granted Open Space funds. Ms. Hone pointed out that the Village has violated the County deed by revising and adopting a new plan showing a 70/30 active/passive recreation area, lights, and two story concession building with recreational hall. This park will generate a substantial amount of money. The second story of this two story building is to be used as a meeting room, and can be rented for sport related functions. Ms. Hone asked if this was discrimination due to the RBSA involvement. It appears to be an arguable breach of contract with the County, due to a violation of the Open Space, and Green Space guidelines.  

Ms. Hone wrote that the historic Zabriskie-Schedler home features and elements were not disclosed to the County, and in some circumstances they were completely omitted. At this time, Ms. Italia’s time for public comment expired.

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, continued to read from Jacqueline Hone’s letter. Ms. Hone went on to state that proper disclosure would mean strict preservation, and limitation of park development and use. Adverse environmental factors that threaten wildlife and vegetation were not disclosed on the application, and full disclosure would mandate preservation, and impose strict site limitations. Ms. Hone wrote that this omission is the way the Village is proceeding with Phase One, which includes the demolition and clear cutting of the last green acre parcel in the local area, which will expose residents and wildlife to noise, pollution, high volume traffic from Route 17, dangerous conditions, and irreversible damage. All of this is being done without expert studies, notification to, or clearance from, the Bergen County Department of Transportation and Environmental Protection Historic Preservation.

Ms. Hone stated that the Village has demonstrated a pattern of secrecy and questionable omissions. A meeting has been scheduled on October 7^th, to accept the second donation of $100,000, from the RBSA, and to present another version of the Schedler Park plan. This agenda was just posted to the Village website, and the general public is not aware that these matters will be discussed on this date. Ms. Hone asked that this matter be postponed until all of the matters she has highlighted have been addressed. She stated that the municipality is required to hold a public hearing on the proposed park development, as part of the application process, before the application is submitted. The hearing must be advertised as a display advertisement at least fifteen days before the hearing, and must specifically reference the proposed Bergen County Open Space Trust Fund Municipal Program Park Improvement application. Ms. Hone stated that the Village Council has a fiduciary obligation to cease and desist moving forward with the Schedler Park project until this matter is investigated, and the Village Council is cleared of wrong doing. Failure to act intentionally permits irreversible damage to the health, safety, general welfare, public land, and historic vegetation preservation. Ms. Hone wrote that she believed that State and County provisions, and the Deed of Conservation easement prevents most everything proposed by the Village at the Schedler property. She and many others in the area want due process, expert studies, and a park that represents the true needs and desires of the neighborhood residents. Ms. Hone stated that she wants this project to move forward in the right direction, and she looks forward to a response from the Village.

Alan Dlugasch, 3 Betty Court, read a letter from his neighbor Patty Infantino, who was unable to attend tonight’s meeting. The letter is in response to a letter from Ralph Currey, which was printed in the Ridgewood News. Ms. Infantino stated that Mr. Currey’s letter of September 18, 2015, was incorrect regarding the position of the east side residents taken in 2008. Ms. Infantino wrote that she attended 2008 meetings regarding the use of the Schedler property as Open Space, and she has often reviewed her notes relative to the August and September 2008 meetings. Three site plans were distributed to the group known as “Keep Ridgewood Green”, and Councilman Mancuso met with all Ridgewood residents who attended. Ms. Infantino met several members of the Sports Council, who advised they would not support Open Space unless the local residents agreed to a field. The residents did not agree to this manipulation, and when the residents met as a group, they did not approve of any of the three site plans which were dated July 10, 1997, and titled “Village of Ridgewood, Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering”. The local residents were concerned that increased traffic flow would cause delays for emergency vehicles in this section of Ridgewood. It was agreed that most of the trees on the property should be preserved because they effectively block the traffic noise from Route 17. Ms. Infantino wrote that the area is in need of a passive area for residents who do not have an area to exercise, and for children who don’t have access to a local park or playground. Maintaining the wooded barrier separates the neighborhood from the noise and air pollution on the highway. The residents are concerned about crime as well, which is why the entrance to the park from Route 17 is preferable to the entrance from West Saddle River Road.  

In conclusion, Ms. Infantino wrote that she speaks for all residents in this area when she states that they worked hard to help Ridgewood acquire the Schedler property, and they would like a better plan which will preserve, and not destroy or disrupt the area where they live.

Ken Marshall, 136 Linden Street, said that he is an Eagle Scout in Troop 7, and a Scout Master. Mr. Marshall said that he has been involved in several Eagle Scout projects, including his own at Habernickel Park, and in other parks throughout the Village. These parks have been instrumental in the advancement of Eagle Scouts, and the projects provided by his organization and Troops 4 and 5 in Ridgewood have played a large role in the development of these areas, and have benefited the community immensely. Mr. Marshall thanked the Village Council and the Department of Parks and Recreation for the great opportunity to achieve success in scouting, and to beautify the community.

Robert Schablik, 561 Van Dyke Street, stated that he appeared at this podium about six months ago proposing his Eagle Scout project to the Village Council. Mr. Schablik reported that he finished his Eagle Scout project a week ago, and he is now officially an Eagle Scout. He thanked the Village Council for allowing him the opportunity to create his project, and bring his dream to life. His project proposed additional trails in the lower portion of Habernickel Park along the brook. Extra signs and a bench were also installed. He stated that he was inspired to create this project as a result of other projects that were completed by Eagle Scouts at Habernickel Park. Mr. Chadwick noted that the scouting organization is grateful to the Village Council for allowing them to do these projects at local parks. Mayor Aronsohn and the Village Council thanked and congratulated Mr. Schablik on his achievements.      

Teresa Isik, 408 Queens Court, said that she has been very happy to live at this address since 1974. She doesn’t understand the development of the rift between the east side and west side of Ridgewood. Ms. Isik indicated that this distinction didn’t exist in 1974, but now she is feeling the divide more than ever. She thinks the development of a 90 foot field, rather than a 60 foot field on the Schedler property will further support the notion that her neighborhood doesn’t merit consideration of the negative effects of more traffic, pollution and noise, which were taken into consideration for the Habernickel Park on the west side of Ridgewood.  

Maribeth Lane, 302 Woodside Avenue, stated that she is representing the Ridgewood Conservancy for Public Land. Ms. Lane announced that the Conservancy will be planting 5,000 daffodil bulbs on October 18^th, in support of this year’s campaign theme, which is 25,000 residents, 25,000 daffodils. The Conservancy has received a donation of a large decorative planter from the widow of Ed Schwartz. They would like to place the planter at the train station, and Mrs. Schwartz has asked that a plaque be placed in the area of the planter. The planter will feature seasonal displays, and Ms. Lane asked to have Village Council approval for this plan. Mayor Aronsohn asked Ms. Lane to contact Ms. Sonenfeld to work out the details.  

Jane Shinozuka, 825 Norgate Drive, stated that the Schedler neighborhood is on the verge of being marginalized, and people who are not familiar with the area may not realize the impact of the noise, the trees, and the potential for crime on the highway. She is concerned because it is an unusual spot, and doesn’t get the attention it deserves.  

On another topic, Ms. Shinozuka referred to the poor quality of Ridgewood Water. In addition there continues to be a problem with the billing. Her last quarterly bill was fairly low at $154.36, and she was warned that there was a recalculation coming. Ridgewood Water told customers that they could submit their own data to avoid a surprise. Ms. Shinozuka was extremely surprised when she received a bill for $6,562.06 for the next quarter. When she contacted Ridgewood Water she was told that she could pay the bill off over a two year period. Ms. Shinozuka spoke to someone else who received a bill for $7,000.00. This individual told her that when they called Ridgewood Water to complain, Ridgewood Water offered a 15% discount, and a five year plan to pay off the balance. She asked that the Village Council look into these astronomical bills, and the fact that there is no consistency in the payment plans and discounts that are offered. Mayor Aronsohn said that the Village Manager will address the issues with Ridgewood Water at the conclusion of the public comment section.

Charlie Nowinski, 2 Betty Court, said that his water bill is $4,500.00, and he is very upset. On another subject, Mr. Nowinski said he takes the bus into New York City every day, and has personal experience relative to the noise levels on Route 17. He works in the construction industry and has reviewed the conceptual plan for Schedler Park. He stated that in his business they don’t remove trees or bring in utilities until a schematic plan has been drawn up by consultants and construction managers. A budget is also created for developers or municipalities, along with an agreement from the impacted neighborhood, which is lacking in this instance. No one in this neighborhood wants an entrance to the park from West Saddle River Road, or a 90 foot field. Mr. Nowinski stated that he is familiar with baseball in Ridgewood. He was involved with RBSA, and was a baseball coach, but a baseball field in this location is a different situation. He asked the Village Council to think of the residents in this neighborhood, who will now experience so much additional noise from the highway due to tree removal. A six foot berm will not alleviate the noise, and a noise barrier is necessary. There will be a decline in property values, and residents should pay less in taxes than what the assessed value is at the moment. Mr. Nowinski concluded that the neighborhood wants and needs a park area, however, the sound and the safety of the neighborhood should be protected by elected officials of the Village.

Councilwoman Hauck commented that she thought Mr. Nowinski was addressing the Village Council in a threatening manner, which does not encourage dialogue. Elected officials should be treated with respect. Councilwoman Hauck stated that the property was purchased with tax dollars for the benefit of the neighborhood, and for someone to say that their neighborhood is being disrespected because the Village is planning to build a $2.5 million park, paid for by tax funds, is insulting. The Village is proposing something positive for the neighborhood. She recalled a similar type of debate when Habernickel Park was in the planning stages. There were numerous discussions on how that park should be laid out and built. The same experts who built Habernickel Park are trying to do something similar at the Schedler property for the benefit of the entire community. Councilwoman Hauck pointed out that this property could have been sold to a developer, and she added that she doesn’t understand why the discussion can’t be more pleasant.

Ralph Currey, 260 Woodside Avenue, stated that he is the Chairperson of the Open Space Committee, and he wanted to respond to the letter from Ms. Hone, and address the entire process. Mr. Currey reviewed the process of the acquisition, and conceptual plan for the development of the property. He stated that this has been an open process, with the opportunity for participation from the public during the past seven years. On October 1, 2008, Mr. Currey made a presentation to the Village Council recommending the purchase of the Schedler property by the Village. The presentation included a conceptual plan that had been approved by the Open Space Committee, and closely resembles the plan that will be presented tonight. The proposal included a 90 foot baseball field, overlay multi-purpose field, woods, walking trail, playground, and parking lot. Mr. Currey said that at the same time, Councilman Patrick Mancuso convened a Schedler Committee comprised of interested residents. The plan was presented to the residents of the neighborhood to generate support for the preservation of the property.

Mr. Currey made an additional presentation of a very similar plan to the Village Council on October 22, 2008. Many neighborhood residents attended the meeting, and no one opposed the conceptual plan. In September 2009, Mr. Currey was involved with the group that met with the Bergen County Open Space Trust Fund to present the Village’s grant application. The same conceptual plan was presented at that meeting, and a discussion of plans for the Schedler House also took place. The Bergen County Open Space Trust Fund was aware of the house, and they indicated that there had been an inquiry from the Bergen County Historical Society to use the house.

Mr. Currey stated that there were a series of public meetings in 2012, to discuss people’s ideas and concerns about the Schedler property, and again a conceptual plan was discussed that is very similar to the plan being presented this evening. The Village Engineer suggested several changes to the plan, including the berm, and he talked about traffic calming features. At the conclusion of those meetings, the Open Space Committee again recommended to the Village Council the development of the property in accordance with the conceptual plan. In August of this year, the Village Council endorsed the recommendation.

Mr. Currey stated that the Open Space Committee has been open and above board throughout the process. The Committee clearly indicated the proposal for the development of the property and the facilities planned. There has been plenty of opportunity for public discussion, debate, and comment and now the time has come to move forward with the plan.    

Jim Albano, 363 Bogert Avenue, said that Mr. Currey’s presentation was the only truth he has heard this evening. He has difficulty listening to the various accusations being made, and he pointed out that they are discussing a park, and a field; not the potential multi-family housing, or an expansion to Valley Hospital. He commented that it is sad that nobody wants progress in the Village anymore. Mr. Albano said this is like a soap opera because it has gone on for so many years. There are no facts or truth behind all of the emails that have been mentioned this evening. He said that a 90 foot field was removed from Benjamin Franklin Middle School, and it needs to be replaced. When the field was removed it was well known that the plans for Schedler Park included a ballfield. Mr. Albano questioned why residents would want to stop the Village from receiving grant money, and he repeated that this is simply a field and a park.

Jim Griffith, 159 South Irving Street, said that this meeting is a repeat of the previous meeting, and he understands why Councilwoman Hauck is upset. He recalled that he attended one of the first meetings on the open space philosophy in Hackensack, twenty years ago on behalf of the Mayor of Ridgewood. That assignment lasted well over two years, but in the end the result was Open Space in Ridgewood. The Schedler property and Habernickel Park are the only two remaining areas of open space in Ridgewood. Mr. Griffith stated that the proposal by the Open Space Committee is the right approach. He encouraged the Village Council to do the necessary research relative to the traffic on Route 17, but ultimately to move forward to make this park a reality.

Kathy Marshall, 136 Linden Street, stated that she was a member of the Parks and Recreation Committee during the purchase of the Schedler property. She referred to the plan that was presented to the Village Council in 2010, and said that the purpose of the Open Space Committee, and the plan was “to continue to expand the Village’s active and passive recreational spaces, to increase the recreational opportunities available to Village residents through the improvement of park spaces, to accommodate the demand for active recreational space from a growing public school population, and to enhance pedestrian enjoyment of natural spaces, and maintain the Village’s community character, and quality of life.” Ms. Marshall indicated that the Village was fortunate to have the opportunity to purchase the Schedler property because it could have been sold to a developer who would have used it for commercial development or high density housing. She recalled that at that time, neighborhood residents attended both Village Council meetings, and other meetings in support of the initiative to purchase the property, and also spoke out in favor of the preliminary development plan. The residents saw the plan as a positive step because they would now have a park in close proximity that they could enjoy.

Ms. Marshall stated that the draft plan specifically called for a 90 foot field because they were aware that the building of the regulation size track at Benjamin Franklin Middle School, and the turfing of the High School field would result in the loss of a 90 foot field. After the purchase was made, the Open Space Committee and Councilman Mancuso’s committee held several public meetings for residents to attend in order to discuss the design and development plans for the Schedler property. Since that time, participation in all sports, including the RBSA, has increased and she encouraged the Village Council to continue down the path which has been laid out over the past seven years. She urged the Village Council to turn the Schedler property into usable space.

Edward Sullivan, a local landlord in the commercial business district, stated that he was at last week’s meeting where things seemed to have reached a new low in Village history. He commented that the Village Council was subjected to excessive abuse last week, and tonight’s meeting seems to be headed in a similar direction. Mr. Sullivan stated that he has no interest in the developments that were discussed last week. He recalled that one speaker commented that these developments would produce a change for the worse in both the downtown as well as the rest of the Village. He said that this accusation should be backed up with facts by the individual speaker. Mr. Sullivan indicated that more residential units in the Village will put a demand on the school system. He would guess that the student enrollment goes up and down every few years, but does not change significantly, and he recommended that a regression analysis be done to back up that fact. This statistical analysis would provide a level of comfort that doesn’t exist at the moment.

Mr. Sullivan stated that he takes exception at the comments directed to town employees, including Ms. Sonenfeld, Mr. Rogers and Ms. Mailander. If people have objections to these employees, they should send letters to the Village Councilmembers because these meetings are not the appropriate forum for accusations.

Nancy Nowinski, 2 Betty Court, said she is concerned about the Schedler property because no independent experts have been retained to ensure that this is a safe and well-designed park. She believes in progress, but it has to be done properly, and the residents must clearly demonstrate their concerns. She wants to be safe when she walks with her dog on West Saddle River Road, and this proposal will not ensure her safety.

Susan Clayville, 399 Queens Court, requested that further expert studies be done on the Schedler property. She commented that there seems to be a lack of creativity in the design of the park. She questioned why there couldn’t be tennis courts and basketball courts instead of a baseball field. Ms. Clayville suggested that the park be modified in accordance with the desires of the surrounding residents, and she asked for drawings from outside sources. Ms. Clayville pointed out that there were four proposals for the parking garage and Village Councilmembers were concerned about how well the proposal would fit with the downtown area. There is only one design for the park. Studies are needed on air quality, noise pollution, as well as a detailed traffic study. Ms. Clayville gave a letter from Jacqueline Hone to the Village Clerk because Ms. Hone could not attend the meeting tonight.  

Bill Bartlett, 338 Queens Court, said that he has lived in the Schedler neighborhood for thirty years. He commended the Village Council for their patience, and thanked them for listening to everyone. Mr. Bartlett asked Village Councilmembers to remember that this is a high volume traffic area. There is an exit from Route 17, and when an accident occurs on Route 17, the traffic on West Saddle River Road comes to a complete stop. All streets in this area are 32 feet curb to curb except West Saddle River Road, which is 23½ feet, curb to curb, with no sidewalks. Any grant money received should be used to bring West Saddle River Road up to the town standard before anything is done at the Schedler property. Mr. Bartlett recommended that traffic counts be done, on an hourly basis between 4:00 P.M. and 7:30 P.M. He pointed out that in bad weather there is a pile-up of cars parked on West Saddle River Road facing Route 17 waiting to pick up commuters. The cars exiting Route 17 are travelling at a speed of 50 or 60 mph, and he suggested that a traffic circle be installed at the head of Kingsbridge Lane, and West Saddle River Road. Fire protection will be compromised on this side of the Village because there will not be adequate space for fire engines to exit from West Saddle River Road to Kingsbridge Lane, and back out again. Mr. Bartlett pointed out that there are a large number of potholes at the intersection of Racetrack Road, and Saddle River Road, which are ignored by Ridgewood, Ho-Ho-Kus, and Bergen County.

Tom Gibson, 419 Spring Avenue, voiced support for the development of the Schedler property, and added that he has been involved in various athletic programs in Ridgewood for sixteen years. He is the former Chairperson of the Ridgewood Soccer Association; the Ridgewood Sports Council; and the Parks, Recreation, and Conservation Board. During this time he has gained a vast understanding of the expansion of sports programs in Ridgewood, which has included the growth of female sports programs. The sports programs have evolved and now include a huge lacrosse program. Mr. Gibson stated that there is a strong need for the development of the Schedler property, and he recalled the development of the Open Space Master Plan recommending the development of Habernickel Park, along with the Schedler Park in the future. He sympathized with residents living in close proximity to the Schedler property, and said he would feel the same as they do if he lived near the property. He recalled similar arguments when Habernickel Park was in its initial stages. He recalled that objections were raised when lights were installed at the High School field and at Veterans Field. Mr. Gibson stated that the Village has a good record of listening to residents in an attempt to work things out, and he hopes that this will happen with the Schedler Park as well.

Frank Giordano, said he used to live at 386 Spring Avenue, and now resides in Washington Township. Mr. Giordano was invited to speak tonight by Tim Cronin, Director of Parks and Recreation. He stated that he volunteered with various sports groups in Ridgewood for 25 years, and was on the Parks and Recreation Commission where he was the lead person on the Maple Park project. Mr. Giordano said that the Schedler Park project should go forward because active recreation space is severely lacking in Ridgewood. He recalled going through the same dialogue process with the neighbors relative to the Maple Park project. At that time, it was predicated that everyone’s basements would be flooded, fish would be killed, and light would be pouring into people’s living rooms. He credited Village Councilmembers and employees such as Christopher Rutishauser, Village Engineer, Matt Rogers, Village Attorney and the Village Manager for all the time spent to address all the concerns of the neighbors. Mr. Giordano pointed out that they raised $100,000 to spend on landscaping alone at Maple Park because it was important to the neighbors. Many residents who opposed the project initially have now indicated that they are very satisfied with the way things turned out. The sports groups didn’t get everything they wanted and everyone had to compromise somewhat.

Mr. Giordano pointed out that the Maple Park project was a unique private/public funding endeavor. Valley Hospital was the corporate sponsor, the sports groups were big contributors, and the Village helped out with financing, including engineering. The community was also called upon to contribute to this $1 million project. The Schedler project has to be handled in a similar way, so that when it is complete, all sides will feel that they have done the right thing. Mr. Giordano said that he would be happy to help with this project in any way he can.

Brian Abdoo, 308 West Ridgewood Avenue, commented that credible arguments have been made on both sides relative to the Schedler property, and everyone is trying to do what is best for their neighborhood. People involved in sports in Ridgewood are well aware of the need for additional field space due to the fact that Ridgewood developed very early, and has much less open space than many surrounding towns. Mr. Abdu urged the Village Council to approve this project. He has watched the proposal develop through the planning stages, and although he doesn’t live in the Schedler park area he is well aware of the need, and the sacrifice that the RBSA made five years ago when they gave up one of their 90 foot fields in favor of a regulation size track at Benjamin Franklin Middle School. Mr. Abdoo said he was recently driving on the West Side Highway during midday, and saw a field where kids were playing soccer and football. They didn’t seem to be bothered in the least that the field was up against a busy highway. He noted that there is a field adjacent to Route 17 in Ho-Ho-Kus where he has coached, and once involved in the activity, he didn’t notice the traffic.  

Ellie Gruber, 229 South Irving Street, said that Mr. Giordano made a good point when he said that his group and Village officials sat down with the neighbors before anything was done. She said that this has not been done with the neighbors on the east side, and it needs to be done. Ms. Gruber reminded everyone that Veterans Field was changed to a 90 foot field to replace the field that was lost when the track was installed at Benjamin Franklin Middle School.

Ms. Gruber referred to civility at meetings, and commented that people feel very strongly about things, and she didn’t think members of the public were being disrespectful. They are being honest, sincere, and heartfelt, and she pointed out that there are many times when Village Councilmembers are disrespectful to each other. Ms. Gruber noted that this plan is not the same plan that was presented in 2008.

Don Delzio, 636 Upper Boulevard, stated that Ms. Gruber was incorrect in her statement that the 90 foot field at Veterans Field was a replacement for the field at Benjamin Franklin Middle School. He pointed out that no one tonight has mentioned the Schedler house. Five years of time and money have been spent on this house; however, due to the lack of comment on the house this evening, it appears that the house is non–existent.

Mr. Delzio referred to earlier speakers, and said that their statements are without fact and baseless. He reviewed the letters, which were read earlier and referred specifically to Patty Infantino’s letter. He said that this letter was 100% void of any factual data, and he objected to the fact that she insulted Ralph Currey. He questioned the qualifications of some speakers, and whether or not they are actually former members of RBSA. Mr. Delzio noted that there are three ball fields in Woodcliff Lake that are adjacent to the Garden State Parkway, where there are six lanes of traffic. He stated that the precedents for the field being considered for Schedler Park have been clearly established.

Doreen Regina, 540 Bennington Terrace, stated that she lives in the Schedler neighborhood. She has three children who all participated in baseball and softball. Both of her sons played high school baseball, one for four years, and she is very familiar with the baseball fields. She referred to the examples of fields adjacent to a highway, which Mr. Delzio described. She pointed out that 5.5 acres of trees were not cut down to accommodate these fields, exposing their neighborhood to air and noise pollution, and completely changing the quality of life for residents in this tiny area. She looks forward to hearing the traffic report from a police officer who took readings one afternoon in August; however, what the neighborhood is asking for are expert studies, which is the way this was handled for the Habernickel Park.

Ms. Regina said that the residents do not object to having a baseball field on this property. They are asking that the field be the appropriate size for the landlocked area where it is located. Residents do not want Route 17 as their backyard, and they are entitled to a natural buffer of trees. A 90 foot field will prevent this buffer.    

Ms. Regina said that she disagrees with Mr. Currey’s report. She attended a meeting before the property was purchased, and it was always noted that they were looking at this property from a balanced approach. She was present at one of Councilman Mancuso’s meetings, and it was never assumed that a 90 foot field was going to happen in this location. Several speakers indicated that they wanted the Schedler Neighborhood Park to be similar to the Habernickel Neighborhood Park. She is not sure when the neighborhood actually saw the plan for the 90 foot field because it was never presented during the times she was there.

Joe Civita, 636 Kenwood Road, said he lives off of West Saddle River Road, and he exits from Route 17 to his home almost daily. People exit at 50 mph in this area and there are pedestrians, some with children, and people on bicycles. The traffic circle is a great idea, but in reality it would cause problems due to the speed at which people exit from Route 17. He did not think a traffic study done in August would indicate a valid number of cars in this area. He reiterated that there are no sidewalks, and there are a number of children walking on the streets. Mr. Civita said that this part of town does not get support, and the roads are not plowed, or properly paved. Cars travelling on Route 17 will slow down to see what is happening on the field which is another safety hazard. This entire area is a disaster waiting to happen, and he implored the Village Council to vote against this plan.

Phil Dolce, 625 Kingsbridge Lane, referred to Habernickel Park and how lovely it is. He commented that whatever the Village doesn’t want gets dumped on the east side of town. It was noted at a previous meeting that there is a rising enrollment in the schools, but Glen School remains closed, and is a money maker for the Board of Education. He pointed out that an outside agency was brought in to do a traffic study regarding Habernickel Park, and a plan for the park was drawn up by a landscape architect. Mr. Dolce stated that the road in front of Habernickel Park is a straight road in a residential area, but a traffic study was conducted. Neither the Village Engineer nor the Head of the Department of Parks and Recreation were involved in the Habernickel Park project, which was completely handled by outsiders with neighborhood input. This same sort of neighborhood input is missing on the east side of town for the Schedler Park Project.

Mr. Dolce stated that the original plan for the Schedler property was submitted in 1997, from the Parks Department. The plan does not include the Schedler house, and when the original grant for Schedler was presented to the County in 2008, all of the historical data was incorrect. Part of the 2009 grant application form requires that the house be assessed historical by a historical association. The application form states that the house was supposedly assessed by the Ridgewood Historic Preservation Commission; however, Mr. Dolce doubts this because there are no minutes to that effect. He remarked that this is proof that anything can be written in a grant application.

Paul D’Arpa, 574 Racetrack Road, stated that his home is located 150 feet from Route 17, and if trees are removed sound will be introduced into the neighborhood that is not there presently. He is concerned that this will devalue homes in this area, and people who invested in these homes did not buy into this type of situation. Mr. D’Arpa invited everyone into his home, including the Open Space Committee, Village professionals, and other experts, and he would be happy to demonstrate what is about to happen.  

Doug Wong, 690 Howard Road, said that he would like the Village Council to consider a traffic study, and input from the neighbors because this will affect everyone in this area. West Saddle River Road is very narrow, and access onto Route 17 south via East Saddle River Road can be difficult. This situation is not helped by the new strip mall which seems to be causing further traffic back-ups.  

Scott Muller, 118 John Street, stated that neither the Village, nor the Board of Education, pay for the upkeep of the fields. Those costs are covered by the various sports organizations in the Village, and not the taxpayers. He felt that this was important to point out, and he thanked the RBSA, and the Village Council for their efforts to make the town a better place.

Lorraine Reynolds, 550 Wyndemere Avenue, indicated that an earlier speaker commented that “this is just a field”. She agreed that it is just a field, and she doesn’t understand how a field could be compared to people’s health, safety, quality of life, and house values which are being compromised. She doesn’t dispute the fact that a field is needed, but it is not fair to put these residents in jeopardy, and have them suffer such a huge financial impact. She asked Village Councilmembers how they would feel if they were thrust into this position.

Councilwoman Hauck reassured everyone that the Village Council would never vote to approve a field at the peril of any resident in the neighborhood. She was sure that studies would be done to prove that sound can be attenuated by planting new trees along the berm. She stated that property values may even increase. The Village Council hasn’t addressed the requests for studies as of yet, or asked for the number of replacement trees that will be planted. Councilwoman Hauck reiterated that she would never jeopardize the health or welfare of any resident.

John Rojao, 650 Kenwood Road, anticipates traffic problems and increased accidents as a result of the park. He pointed out that Queens Court is located just past the exit from Route 17, and he has had some near misses coming off of Route 17, when he is behind someone turning onto that street. He expects his home, which is in close proximity to the Schedler property, to go down in value when the ballfield is developed.

Yen Chan, 615 Kingsbridge Lane, stated that he lives directly across from the Schedler property. He requested that studies be done that are objective rather than subjective.

Dan Fusco, 329 Queens Court, stated that a sound barrier from Route 17 is currently located in his backyard. The sound barrier is ineffective, and he hears the noise from Route 17, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. It appears to Mr. Fusco that most people supporting this project don’t live in the area. He asked Village Councilmembers to spend time in the neighborhood, walk the area, and watch the traffic coming onto West Saddle River Road, and then ask whether this project is appropriate for this site.      

Kathy Bourn, 645 Kingsbridge Lane, said that she has lived in Ridgewood for forty years, and she has watched her children and grandchildren participate in various sports activities. As a result, she has supported the RBSA over many years. She has learned that the RBSA is making a generous gift to the Village. Ms. Bourn asked if this is the only plan being considered because there may be strings attached to the gift from the RBSA.  

Mayor Aronsohn said he would address this question before the presentation this evening. No one else came forward at this time, and Mayor Aronsohn closed the public portion of the meeting.

Mayor Aronsohn stated that the Village Council views the presentation on the Schedler proposal as the start of the conversation. The Village Council adopted a resolution last month adopting the 2012 recommendations of the Open Space Committee, which include a way forward on the house. The resolution contains provisions for a 90 foot baseball field, multi-purpose overlay, passive space and a playground; however, this is a work in progress. Mayor Aronsohn stated that Village professionals are here to address questions concerning comparisons to Habernickel Park, and traffic. They look forward to input from everyone, and Mayor Aronsohn agreed that health and safety are a priority on any issue in Ridgewood.

Councilwoman Knudsen referred to a letter to the editor from Don Delzio suggesting that she had a conflict of interest relative to the Schedler property. This letter also contained false statements of fact. She said that she appreciates the feedback and support she has received as a result of this letter. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she has no personal interest in any property adjacent to the Schedler property. She has family members who live in the neighborhood, who share the same concerns as those expressed by others in that area, but at no time did she make any statement that she would be recusing herself from any discussions, or decisions regarding the Schedler property. Councilwoman Knudsen said that the fact that Mr. Delzio would call her deceitful brings the mudslinging to an all-time low. She has letters indicating that there is no conflict of interest, and that she can fully participate in discussions and decisions on this matter.

Councilman Pucciarelli stated that he has received similar accusations on the multi-family housing that was discussed at the last meeting. These accusations erode confidence in the public process, and are unfounded. He observed that attempting to get a Councilmember to recuse themselves seems to be the new sport in town. Councilman Pucciarelli referred to the comment made that Councilmembers should visit the site, and he said they have all visited the site many times. He has also paid many visits to the Schedler house, and has offered to help with the 501 C 3. They are all very familiar with the property itself, and the surrounding neighborhood.

3.            PRESENTATIONS

                a.            Open Space Committee – Survey

Councilman Sedon introduced Ralph Currey, Chairman of the Open Space Committee; as well as Jim Bostler, and Wendy Dockray, who are working on the Open Space Survey. The purpose of the survey is to get an idea of what people in Ridgewood use the fields for, how the fields are actually used, and what people would like to see in the future. This information will assist in updating the Open Space plan.  

Ralph Currey, Chairman of the Open Space Committee, stated that the initial Open Space and Recreation Plan were submitted to the Village Council in 2003. It was updated in 2010, and is due to be updated again. The guidelines of the New Jersey State Green Acres require the plan to contain a needs analysis, which is defined as “an analysis of the adequacy of the current Open Space and Recreation System to satisfy present and future needs”. In prior Open Space reports, they had relied on National and State guidelines for the amount of open recreational space the community should have based on its population, school population, and size. The Open Space Committee wants to incorporate a community based assessment of the wants and needs into the needs analysis for this Open Space update. Mr. Currey stated again that this would include what people would like to have added, and what they would like to have improved. The survey is being done with the help of Jim Bostler and Wendy Dockray, who have a vast experience in designing and administering surveys, along with analyzing the data gathered from surveys.

Mr. Bostler recommended to the Village Council that Survey Monkey be used. Survey Monkey is an on-line survey that will allow for the creation of a survey unique to Ridgewood, and will allow the data collection of survey responses, and data analysis. Mr. Bostler said that he has been working on the creation of the survey; however, there are certain limitations when using the site freely, including the fact that the survey cannot be printed. He has managed to print out a document that will give an example of the questions and data they are trying to gather. The first priority is to assess the current needs of the Open Space Committee; followed by the current use of the existing open space; residents’ satisfaction of the available open space; how the open space is being used i.e. in an active or passive way; and ideas for the future use of open space. There will be several questions on funding for open space, such as whether or not funding should be increased. Mr. Bostler concluded that although this is not a professional survey, it is the closest thing you can get to a professional survey without spending thousands of dollars.

Ms. Dockray stated that the survey contains fourteen questions. The plan is to do a random sample survey, and not a full survey of the Village. She and Mr. Bostler spent a lot of time with the Open Space Committee to come up with the questions. They researched questions other towns have used, and how those questions were formatted. They plan to survey 1,000 individuals with the goal to achieve 425 responses. The individuals to be surveyed will be randomly selected from the voting list, which provides a good cross section of home owners and renters. Ms. Dockray explained that a letter will be sent to those who are selected, and they will be given a password with which to complete the survey. Two weeks later, a reminder card will be sent to the participants indicating the importance of their participation. Ms. Dockray added that if someone does not have access to a computer, they will be asked to contact the Parks Department, and a hard copy of the survey will be forwarded to them with a return envelope. Results of the survey will be tabulated using Survey Monkey which will save a good deal of time.

Ms. Dockray explained that a budget was created, with help from Mr. Currey and Mr. Bostler. She looked into what other towns were paying for various surveys, and learned that it can run as high as $20,000. There is a fee of $780 to join Survey Monkey, and she understands that the Village may already be a member. If that is the case, it will cost $1,032, to do this survey, and there will be other incremental charges for postage and printing.  

Mr. Currey said that the Open Space Committee has existed since 2002, and this is the first time they have asked for any financial assistance from the Village. Mayor Aronsohn thanked the Committee, and asked if the Village has an account with Survey Monkey. Ms. Sonenfeld recalled that at a recent meeting there was a presentation relative to a survey about senior citizens in Ridgewood. It was stated at that time that Survey Monkey should be used, and this demonstrates that a membership would be useful. Councilmember Sedon agreed that it would be useful to have one account that Village affiliated committees could use. He added that these surveys provide a great form of feedback from the residents, and could save taxpayers a lot of money. Ms. Sonenfeld stated that money is tight in the Village for the rest of the year, and she will research whether there is grant money available to cover the cost of Survey Monkey. Councilwoman Knudsen suggested that Ms. Sonenfeld check to see if the Board of Education uses Survey Monkey. Ms. Sonenfeld will check further, and she will find out how the licensing works.

Mayor Aronsohn thanked Mr. Currey, Mr. Bostler, and Ms. Dockray. Councilwoman Knudsen asked when they could expect an updated Open Space Plan. Mr. Currey indicated that a plan would probably be ready in the spring of 2016.

                b.            Proposed Hudson Street Parking Garage – Desman Associates and Financial Review

Mayor Aronsohn reported that the Village is moving forward with a proposal to build a parking garage at the site of the present Hudson Street parking lot. An environmental analysis has been completed in addition to a survey of the land, and most recently Desman Associates has been hired to design the garage. Tonight’s discussion will also include information on how the garage will be financed. Mayor Aronsohn reminded everyone that a non-binding referendum will be placed on the November 3, 2015 General Election ballot. He expects the Village Council to decide whether or not to move forward with the garage in November or December based on all of this information. The presentation will include the initial conceptual design, with the goal of getting public input from now until the referendum takes place.

Mayor Aronsohn reported that this plan will be presented to the Historic Preservation Commission, and the Planning Board. On October 21^st, Desman Associates will be on hand for a question and answer presentation with the public. There will also be a Central Business District (CBD) forum. Ms. Sonenfeld stated that there will be another forum with the Village Council and the public on October 14^th. Mayor Aronsohn added that a rendering will be available shortly on the Village website, as well as in the lobby of Village Hall.

Tim Tracy, of Desman Associates, introduced himself, and said that Desman had recently been selected by the Village to facilitate the design of the proposed parking garage located at Hudson Street and Broad Street in Ridgewood. Mr. Tracy introduced Ken Schier from S&L Architects who would be collaborating with Desman on the design of the parking garage. Mr. Tracy stated that there have been several productive meetings with Village professionals, and they are at the point where there is sufficient information for the Village, the Village Council, as well as the public to understand, and digest the project in the hopes of engaging in a healthy dialogue.

Mr. Tracy described the site as having some constraints. He stated that the geometric deficiencies become amplified the higher the building becomes, and it is more difficult to provide the number of parking spaces that the Village was hoping for. They have looked at three options. The first option calls for the structure to stay within the existing footprint of the surface line, not going outside of its boundaries. All of the plans include a five level, four story parking facility, which is in conformance with the Zoning Code of the Village relative to height, and number of levels. Option One would provide 312 spaces with a high efficiency of almost 400 square feet of space. Mr. Tracy indicated that this is important because every square foot of space that is built has to be paid for in terms of construction. He explained that the project will be better economically, and more efficient, with the least amount of square footage needed per parking space. The cost per space will be less, and the overall construction budget will be less. Mr. Tracy noted that the Village wanted to net 300 spaces in the parking garage. This plan would net about 230 added spaces, which falls short by about 70 spaces.

Mr. Tracy stated that Option Two expands the footprint within the Village’s existing infrastructure to the Hudson Street right-of-way. At the moment, Hudson Street runs one way west bound, and provides a limited number of on-street curbside parking spaces. They considered using the area presently occupied by on-street parking, which would expand the footprint of the site, resulting in a more efficient design that would increase the number of parking spaces. There would be a net loss of seven spaces on the street, but this would allow for a net gain of 250 spaces, or a total of 335 spaces.

Mr. Tracy described the Third Option, which would eliminate both sides of on-street parking on Hudson Street, and further expand the north south footprint of the existing lot, while maintaining adequate cart way for vehicles travelling one way. Mr. Tracy said it was very useful to be able to share ideas with the working group, which consisted of members of the Building Department, the Fire Department, and the Police Department. This enabled Desman to better understand the needs of the Public Safety groups, relative to circulation throughout the Village. Mr. Tracy stated that efficiency is now at 330 square feet per car resulting in a net gain of 317 parking spaces at the sacrifice of 17 on-street parking spaces. Mr. Tracy stated that by expanding the footprint, and transforming the Village on-street parking spaces into an off-street facility, they have been able to realize a net gain of 75 parking spaces. They have also managed to stay within the boundary of the site.

Mr. Tracy stated that another option moves the northerly curb line of Hudson Street south, which eliminates one row of parking. The on-street parking on the south side of Hudson Street would be maintained. This results in a better parking arrangement, and more parking spaces per square foot; however, there will still only be parking on one side of the circulation aisle in one bay of the parking structure. This is a reduction in the parking efficiency.  

Regarding Option Three, Mr. Tracy said that Hudson Street has been reduced to an 18 or 20 foot cart way, which the design team and the Village professionals agree to be adequate to accommodate a one way traffic flow. The concept of an arcade will be introduced by going above the sidewalk and maintaining sufficient sidewalk width. As you travel further upward there will be an adequate clearance above Hudson Street. A slight cantilever will be introduced further over the sidewalk, where it will begin to take form, and where the most efficient parking footprint can be utilized. This scenario really begins to maximize the efficiency of the property by producing 300 parking spaces. This is a better economic model offering more return on investment because the cost per space is being reduced.

Mr. Tracy stated that the parking garage becomes a three dimensional building as vehicles and pedestrians travel through the facility. He referred to the models, and stated that they help everyone to understand, visualize, and get a better perspective of the components needed to be part of this facility for the structure, the pedestrians, and the vehicles. He noted that the image is starting to take on the perspective of the arcade, and some thought has to be given to enhancing the unique design component, which will make the structure more attractive. The model demonstrates how deminimis the effect of the cantilever really is on the upper levels. It doesn’t create any light and air issues, and is not an impediment to circulation on Hudson Street.

Mr. Tracy said that they began to look at the building architecturally, keeping in mind that the structure must blend in with the unique look of the downtown area, while also thinking of economical requirements. He called on Mr. Schier who explained that they wanted a building that would respond to the functionality of a parking garage, while matching the character of the CBD. He has created a curved building façade, and a lobby with a clearly defined elevator and staircase, which he believes to be in keeping with the other building corners in Ridgewood. This is a large structure, and he has tried to bring down the scale of the building by breaking the façade into different levels. The arcade or the cantilever section allows for the creation for the fourth dimension, which is experienced on the inside of the building from a pedestrian level. This break down of the building is a physiological trick, or a type of optical illusion. Mr. Schier presented an example of the colors they are considering, which they feel will fit with the aesthetics of the Village, and will help with the scale.  

Mr. Schier stated that this is a work in progress, and they did not want to create a parking garage that looks similar to others they have created for other municipalities. He pointed out that they have tried to incorporate a building with arches that are reflective of the fire house that once occupied this property, and which is more in keeping with the architecture of the area.

Mayor Aronsohn stated that this is the first time the Village Council has seen this design, and he asked for comments from the Village Council. Councilman Pucciarelli stated that it is obvious that the parking garages of 2015 don’t resemble the garages of the 1970s. He was pleased to see that the functionality of the building is not being hidden. He asked Mr. Tracy to comment on the difference between an open versus a closed garage, and which model this is.

Mr. Tracy said they wanted the Village to have an open parking structure, which means that the structure would not require mechanical ventilation or a sprinkler system. These extras result in on-going maintenance and operating costs. The eastern edge of the building was specifically set back 20 feet to provide the opportunity to keep that side of the building open. This also allows for the relocation of the access easement that travels through the property to the north. Mr. Tracy stated that an enclosed parking structure would add several thousand dollars of construction cost. This is an open structure which will allow for natural ventilation and light to get though.

Mayor Aronsohn asked Mr. Tracy to address safety, handicapped accessibility, and sustainability. Mr. Tracy noted that there are two stair towers, one with an elevator. All floors would be handicapped accessible, and provisions have been made on the ground floor for all of the handicapped accessible parking spaces, including added height for handicapped vans. Regarding sustainability, Mr. Tracy stated that a number of items have been discussed that could easily be added to the project. These include vehicle charging stations, bike racks, designated parking for alternative fuel vehicles, and energy efficient lighting. Mr. Tracey indicated that there are line items in the budget to address most of those items. There are other sustainable items that could be incorporated into the project relating to the operation and management of the facility.

Regarding safety, Mr. Tracy pointed to the all glass stair towers that provide adequate visibility in and out, and he said that emergency call stations will be added. They will add as many passive elements as possible, and will work with Village professionals to enhance the level of safety and security. He pointed out that studies now show people are gravitating to parking structures because they are closer to destinations, and they are much more convenient in inclement weather. Mr. Tracey has discussed, with the Police Department, the possibility of shutting the structure during off hours, and closing roof levels.  

Councilman Sedon inquired about bicycle parking, and Mr. Tracy stated that there are several locations on multiple levels where bike racks can be accommodated. The Village had indicated that bike parking was a necessity, and there are many alternatives they can look at such as bike racks, or bike lockers. Councilman Sedon asked if architectural renderings for Option One and Option Two were available. Mr. Tracy said that Option Two is similar to Option Three; however, Option One is completely different because of the ramps on the end, and the curved nature of the end of the building. Option Two and Three are much more consistent.

Councilwoman Hauck stated that the proper aesthetics for this building mean that it will be mentally absorbed into the downtown. She favors the promenade, and the fact that the cantilevered roof provides shelter and comfort. She isn’t sure this will match the existing architecture in the CBD. Mr. Schier said that the materials that are proposed match materials used in the downtown area now. The lower part of the building is concrete, which is colored to look more like a limestone. The entire structure is built from concrete, and somewhat reflective of the character of a garage without the appearance of a Disneyland façade. He added that this is not the final design, and it could be used as a starting point. Councilwoman Hauck suggested that Mr. Schier prepare a rendering to better depict what the building will actually look like. Mr. Tracy stated that these images are early generations, and he recognized that the use of stone is prevalent in many of the buildings downtown. He agreed that the facility should be reflective of the history, and the character of the Village, and everyone’s comments and observations are critical to making the project as successful as possible. Councilwoman Hauck liked the concrete and brick that is proposed because it reminds her of the old Hudson Street firehouse. She suggested that the parking facility be named the Hudson Street Deck.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked if she could get copies of the slides, and Ms. Sonenfeld indicated that she could provide those to the Councilmembers. Councilwoman Knudsen said that the structure appears massive, and she asked if they could email their ideas to Mr. Tracy. Ms. Sonenfeld asked that emails be sent to her, and she will forward them to Mr. Tracy. Councilwoman Knudsen thought that making the structure look more like several different structures could reduce the overall emphasis of the bulk of the facility. Councilman Pucciarelli said that Mr. Schier has done that with other projects. Mr. Schier stated that the building will be experienced in quite a different way when you are at ground level.

Mayor Aronsohn referred to the proposal made by Mr. Tracy at the Central Business District forum about changing the direction of the one-way street. Mr. Tracy said that people who are unfamiliar with the Village gravitate to Ridgewood Avenue, and they look for parking on East Ridgewood Avenue. If they don’t find parking, they look to the surface lot on Broad Street. If they don’t find a spot there, they will head south on Broad Street to the new parking facility. Unfortunately, they will be going the wrong way because you can’t make a turn onto Hudson Street from Broad Street to access the parking facility. Mr. Tracy suggested that the orientation of Hudson Street be changed to eastbound in order to make a left turn or a right turn onto Hudson Street to access the facility. This will make departure via Prospect Street easier because it is parallel to East Ridgewood Avenue. This will somewhat disperse traffic through the east west corridor, and Mr. Tracy said that they are initiating a traffic study to collect data on this possibility.

Mayor Aronsohn thanked Mr. Tracy and Mr. Schier for their presentation tonight.

Ms. Sonenfeld introduced, Robert Rooney, the Village CFO, who would discuss the final financial analysis done by Walker Associates. This analysis was performed to determine whether or not the parking utility could support both the operating expenses as well as the debt expense on the garage. Mr. Rooney stated that Walker Associates was asked to provide financial information relative to the cost to operate the garage, and the payment of debt service costs for the new facility, as well as the operation of existing facilities. Mr. Rooney stated that the report concludes that sufficient revenue can be generated from fees to cover debt service and operating costs, with no impact on tax dollars. Projections have been done over twelve years, and the schedules delineate revenue streams, current operating costs, and the new garage. Walker Associates are extremely conservative in their revenue projections. There will be new revenue streams and projected increases in the fees. Mr. Rooney pointed out that there will be an increase for non-resident commuter demand as a result of a more favorable rate under the proposed revenue streams. At the moment, there are fifteen permits for parking issued to non-residents. Walker estimates a significant increase in non-resident parking permits which will be attributable to an adjustment to the rates that will entice commuters to park in Ridgewood. Walker has also predicated an increase in revenue as a result of valet parking, which will be consolidated in the new parking facility. They anticipate the development of the Brogan Cadillac and Ken Smith property which will force people to use the parking garage. Mr. Rooney stated that Walker Associates predicts that parking revenue will be realized mid-year in 2017, and totally in 2018.

Mr. Rooney stated that the parking utility must be looked at as a whole. All of-the revenue that is generated from on-street parking, off-street parking, and the garage must be tallied to determine whether there is sufficient revenue to cover operating and service costs. Walker looked at parking rate changes, and they researched the fees charged in similar towns with train stations throughout New Jersey. In 2016, meter hours will be extended from 6:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M., or 9:00 P.M. This change is based on how usage is structured in other communities. The meters rates on key downtown streets will increase to 75 cents, from 50 cents. In 2017, the 75 cent meters will be increased to one dollar, and the remaining meters will increase to 75 cents. If needed, rates would increase by 25 cents after five years. Commuter permit rates will increase by $25 in the year 2025. Mr. Rooney indicated that parking revenues are estimated to increase by $400,000, in 2016, as a result of the rate increases on existing meters, and again in 2017. The new revenue begins in 2017, as a result of the capacity provided by the new parking garage. Walker estimates that the operating expenses for the new facility will begin mid-2017, and will increase by 3% annually. The debt service numbers reflect approximately $500,000 in 2016, for short term borrowing, increasing to approximately $700,000 in 2017, and $775,000 thereafter for permanent bonding. Mr. Rooney indicated that this will provide debt service coverage of approximately $1.5 million, which is significantly higher than what is required. The estimate used to project the debt service is in line with the projections and estimates received from Desman Associates.

Ms. Sonenfeld reiterated that this is a conservative analysis. She stated that this information will be available on the Village website. She explained that there are retained earnings, or an annual surplus, which is added to the debt service. In addition to covering the debt, at least $300,000 a year will be generated that will not be going back into the debt, which allows for some space. Any demand that is shifting from publically owned facilities, or crowded on-street parking is neutral. The report does not anticipate any increase in parking demand by residents or visitors as a result of easier parking. Ms. Sonenfeld said that an argument could be made that an increase in parking fees could reduce demand, and the analysis includes a 10% drop in demand for every fee increase. There are no increased ticket fees, and Ms. Sonenfeld stated that the $19 ticket fee is low.  

Mayor Aronsohn noted that this report was based on a $13 million cost for the parking structure which is in line with projections from Desman Associates. He observed that there is a menu of different options in terms of revenue streams, which will cover the cost of the garage, and provide a cushion or surplus, with no impact on taxes. He recalled that out of town commuters were priced out by huge increases for permit fees, and the numbers decreased from 125 to 12. If the costs can be lowered, the number of non-resident commuters will be potentially higher.  

Several Councilmembers felt that the report contained a lot of information to be absorbed. Councilwoman Hauck stated that it was very interesting to see the way the usage had been broken down, and the different areas of the Village where parking is under-utilized. It is obvious that the most crowded area of the Village for parking is the top of East Ridgewood Avenue near Broad Street. This reinforces to her that this is the perfect spot for the parking garage. Councilwoman Hauck asked about the price of the Walker Associates study, and Mr. Rooney stated that this study cost approximately $18,000.

Councilman Sedon asked if parking in the garage would be free after 8:00 P.M. or 9:00 P.M. Mr. Sonenfeld stated that the revenue projections include paid parking until 9:00 P.M.

                c.             Schedler Park Presentation

Ms. Sonenfeld explained that the presentation this evening is just the beginning of public discussion on the actual design of Schedler Park. There will be another opportunity for public comment later tonight, and next week there will be a public hearing on the specifics of the grant. The design of the area is based on the resolution adopted a few weeks ago by the Village Council.

Ms. Sonenfeld introduced Charles DiMarco, of the Parks and Recreation Committee, who in turn introduced Tim Cronin, the Director of Parks and Recreation; Sgt. John Chuck, of the Traffic Division; Christopher Rutishauser, Village Engineer and Director of Public Works; and Nancy Bigos, Assistant Director of the Parks and Recreation Department. Mr. DiMarco stated that the mission of the Parks and Recreation Committee is to preserve open space, provide facilities, and year round recreation facilities to meet all the needs of the residents. The Village continues to strive forward with park property acquisition, development, and recreational program offerings for all. Mr. DiMarco reviewed some of the highlights for Schedler Park, which includes ADA accessible paths, a children’s playground and a sitting area, ADA accessible washrooms, the ball field, the multi-purpose field, a 74 space parking lot, a woodland and nature area, and informal gardens.

Mr. Rutishauser had distributed a site development study prepared for the Schedler property, along with an 11 inch by 17 inch rendering. He recalled that the Village had acquired this property in two phases. They purchased the three lots of the Schedler property first, followed by the General Energy property, which is a small triangular piece of property that had been owned by Shotmeyer Fuel. The site is a flat piece of property with some trees, which suffered a lot of damage during the three major storms which have hit the area in the past few years. Mr. Rutishauser stated that a number of studies were done in order to develop the plan, which is being considered at this time. The property was purchased through the aid of Bergen County Open Space funding, and one of their requirements was to conduct a preliminary assessment of the two parcels. The assessment would provide information on environmental conditions and hazards that could become a liability to the Village or to the County. The assessment was performed, and no concerns were revealed.

Mr. Rutishauser reported that a survey was prepared by Dan Dunn, the Village surveyor, who conducted a detailed topographical boundary survey noting easements throughout the property. The concept plans were drawn using Mr. Dunn’s base map. The property has some environmental constraints; however, there are no wetlands, streams, or bodies of water. The lots are not in a flood hazard area. Mr. Rutishauser noted that residents have raised concerns about the flora and fauna. A natural heritage data base search was conducted by the New Jersey State Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), and State Forestry Services. They did not note any animals or fauna on site that would be of any concern, however, they did note a bald eagle, and a heron in the vicinity    

Mr. Rutishauser indicated that the Village has a certified tree expert on staff who works with the Parks Department. The trees on the property were examined, and he recommended that the damage and toppled trees be removed for safety reasons. The Village intends to get this done soon.

Mr. Rutishauser acknowledged that traffic is a major concern with this project. Sgt. John Chuck of the Ridgewood Police Department conducted two traffic studies. These detailed reports were done in two cycles. The first cycle was done between June 20^th and June 25^th. He explained that a monitoring device was installed, and all data was logged. The second study was done August 10^th through August 15^th. The study conducted in June noted that the average vehicle speed reported was 31 mph on a 25 mph road. The average speed recorded in the second study was 33 mph. The peak vehicle counts from the study indicated approximately 128 vehicles between the hours of 1:00 P.M. and 2:00 P.M. on June 20^th, which breaks down to one vehicle every 30 seconds. Peak traffic volume during both months was between 10:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. An observation was made that a lot of traffic volume was attributable to landscapers, and service contractors coming into neighborhood homes.

Mr. Rutishauser stated that the traffic studies have resulted in the removal of the proposed traffic circle or roundabout at Kingsbridge Lane. There will be a dedicated left turn lane for the northbound direction of West Saddle River Road into the proposed parking lot area. Discussions with the Police Department and the Open Space Committee revealed concern about the traffic on Route 17. Mr. Rutishauser is proposing a six and a half foot high, seventeen foot wide earth berm to help address these concerns. The berm will be planted with deciduous trees that grow quite large and hefty such as a red oak. The berm will extend from the southern tip by the parking lot to the northern end of the site. The berm will provide screening, and is designed to mitigate wayward vehicles. Mr. Rutishauser pointed out that Police Chief Ward had suggested that the berm be extended further south to encompass the entire western periphery of the proposed parking area.  

Councilwoman Hauck questioned the difference between the number of trees that are slated for removal, and the number of trees that will be planted. Mr. Rutishauser stated that they haven’t done a count yet, but a tree survey will be done once the toppled, dead, and diseased trees have been removed. They will have a better idea of what remains when all the debris has been removed, and they will also determine which trees can be preserved.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked why evergreens wouldn’t be planted on the berm. Mr. Rutishauser explained that evergreens are slow growing trees, and the bottoms of coniferous trees die out after a number of years. He said that coniferous trees are planned along West Saddle River Road. Two guide rails facing Route 17, as well as an additional guiderail at the property line with Route 17 will be added. There will be a second guide rail set back about 8 feet mounted midway up on the berm. Councilman Pucciarelli asked what would stop the berm from eroding, and Mr. Rutishauser said that the berm will be mulched with woodchips, or a gravel cover will be used.

Mr. Rutishauser reported on preliminary discussions with Charles DiMarco, from the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC), and there will be a full discussion of the site with CSAC very soon.

Sgt. John Chuck began his presentation by reporting that in the last three years, there have not been any accidents on West Saddle River Road. Speed counters were located in two different areas during two different time frames which provides for a more accurate traffic count for the entire site. The traffic counters for the second study were done in August, and were set up directly on the exit ramp on the sound wall side. The average speed in this location was 33 mph. Sgt. Chuck stated that the volumes were lower than anticipated. The higher traffic count was 5,700 cars over a five day period, and he compared that to Linwood Avenue which averages over 10,000 cars per day. Because of these low numbers, they decided that the roundabout was not necessary. Sgt. Chuck has suggested a dedicated left turn lane to Kingsbridge, so that traffic going north isn’t slowed down by people making a left turn.

Sgt. Chuck said that the proposed entrance to the park at Kingsbridge Road has raised safety concerns. He stated that Kingsbridge Road is 390 feet from a good line of site from the exit ramp. He has concluded that at 33 mph, a car would have a distance of 400 feet to stop, which is a more than adequate distance. A car would need 257 feet to stop if it were to exit the ramp at 55 mph, which is still plenty of space. Sgt. Chuck commented that the numbers demonstrate that this could actually be one of the safest streets in Ridgewood, and the park entrance would have no impact on the roadway.

Mr. DiMarco stated that there is no need for the proposed roundabout. Studies show that the southbound traffic on West Saddle River Road is very light, and there is ample opportunity to make a left turn into the parking lot. The left turn lane is a simpler, and a more conventional approach to safely enter the parking lot.

Councilman Sedon questioned whether the traffic volume would have been different if the study was conducted in another month such as October or March. Sgt. Chuck stated that the first study was done during the last week of school, and the second study was done during summer baseball season. Mr. DiMarco stated that June is a very busy month because inclement weather isn’t normally a problem, the schools are open. There are compensating factors in August that are similar to June which are noted in the study. Mr. DiMarco said that in his experience traffic counts done in October or March would yield similar results.

Mr. Rutishauser referred to noise and sound. He stated that the Engineering Department has a sound meter, and they took two days of sound readings along West Saddle River Road. Readings were taken along the curb on the Schedler side, and on the curb on the opposite side of the street. Sound measurements ranged from 57.5 decibels to 78.2 decibels on August 20^th; and on August 21^st readings in the range of between 58.1 decibels to 73 decibels were noted. Mr. Rutishauser stated that many of the readings were above the 65 decibel range, which is the permissible level in the State Noise Code; however, it is important to note that this area is exempt from that code because it is traffic on a public roadway. The Village does not have a separate noise code and must really on state regulations.  

Councilwoman Knudsen asked for the date, time, and place of the Citizens Advisory Committee meeting where these details will be discussed. Mr. DiMarco said that the next meeting is October 15^th, at 7:30 P.M. in the Garden Room, and this topic may or may not be on the agenda pending the outcome of tonight’s meeting. Regarding the traffic study, Councilwoman Knudsen asked Sgt. Chuck if he was aware of the last day of school in June. Sgt. Chuck said he didn’t know, and Councilwoman Knudsen recalled that graduation was on June 17^th or 18^th, and if that is the case, the June traffic readings would have been taken when school was not in session. Sgt. Chuck stated that he would have expected peak traffic times to be during commuter times in the morning and evenings, and not midday as is noted here. Councilwoman Knudsen commented that she knows it is important to conduct traffic studies when school is in session. Sgt. Chuck said that another study could be done; however, he is confident that the numbers will not be much different because there are no schools in this area. Mr. DiMarco added that this is not a well-travelled commuter roadway, which is why the traffic numbers here are low. Councilwoman Knudsen asked if the width of the road had any relationship to the speed of the roadway. Mr. DiMarco stated that the narrower the road is, the lower the speed is.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked for an explanation relative to this State exemption mentioned by Mr. Rutishauser. Mr. Rutishauser said that exceptions are made for all roadways, and the Statute contains a dozen exemptions to the noise standard of 65 decibels. The two exemptions he mentioned may relate to the proposed activities, and existing conditions on the Schedler property. Mr. Rutishauser explained that an exception from the noise code depends a lot on the source of the noise, and how it is classified.  

Mayor Aronsohn asked for the specific location where the noise was measured. Mr. Rutishauser stated that a member of the Village Engineering Department placed equipment at 50 paces along West Saddle River Road and took the readings. Additional readings were then taken at another 50 paces along West Saddle River Road. Readings were also taken from the other side of West Saddle River Road on the east side, and equipment was lined up to match with the prior reading points to take the other two decibel readings. Mayor Aronsohn questioned whether removing, and replacing the trees would result in more noise, less noise, or about the same amount of noise. Mr. Rutishauser stated that they have now established a base line that can be used as the target range. If and when the park goes forward, readings will be taken, and if there is an increase in decibels, steps will be taken to try and mitigate the increased noise. Councilman Pucciarelli said that this is what would be done after the fact, and he asked if there was a way to project the change in the amount of noise. Mr. Rutishauser said that projections are difficult because there is not as much foliage on the property or at the periphery. He would expect the project to go forward with more dense coverage along the highway, and there would also be plantings along West Saddle River Road.    

Councilwoman Knudsen asked if there are other ballfields along the highway, which are similar to this area where the Engineering Department could recreate these sound numbers. She wondered if several scenarios could be projected for a 60 foot field, and a 90 foot field based on those site visits. Mr. Rutishauser said that there are several fields including those in Rutherford, Hasbrouck Heights, Ho-Ho-Kus, and Mahwah. There are also fields along the Garden State Parkway. He has visited these fields when his children have been involved in different sporting events, and he said that you really don’t notice the traffic because you are focusing on an activity where your child is a participant. He indicated that it would be impossible to predict these types of sound levels at the Schedler Park location.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that sound travels up when it hits a wall or a berm. Mr. Rutishauser said that this is why trees are used to break the sound. Concrete walls are not an ideal solution either, and this is why there are walls made of various substances along Route 17. He said that the Village is meeting with the DOT next week to ask them about their experience with the various materials. Mayor Aronsohn said that the goal would be to meet or exceed the baseline sound level existing in the neighborhood at the moment. Mr. Rutishauser said that they will discuss the possibility of a concrete barrier with DOT; however, he finds these barriers to be unsightly

Mr. Rutishauser said that he took Fire Chief Van Goor on an extensive tour of the Schedler house on August 20^th. He showed the Chief how the house was secured, so that he could prepare a response plan by the Fire Department in the event of a fire. Regarding fire safety in the field, Ridgewood Water performed a hydrant flow test on some of the available hydrants on West Saddle River Road, and concluded that there are 1,100 gallons of water available per minute. Mr. Rutishauser proposed the installation of a fire hydrant along the northern edge of the parking lot near the concession stand, for field use. If this is done, Chief Van Goor is requesting that the hydrant be extended to the other side of the berm so there is a water source for the other side of the highway. There is no source of water in this section of Route 17 and when responding to an incident on the highway, the Fire Department has to rely on the tank water carried on the fire engines. Mr. Rutishauser would highly recommend complying with Chief Van Goor’s request.

Mr. Rutishauser pointed out that the house known as the Zabriskie-Schedler house has not been occupied for ten years, and is in a state of disrepair. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Historic Preservation Office issued a certification of eligibility for the home to be included in the National Register of Historic Places on May 2, 2014. The house contains mold contamination, a leaky roof, crumbling chimney, and issues with asbestos and lead based paints. These items would have to be remediated at some point, but the home has been secured, and is under frequent observation to ensure that there is no wildlife or human incursions. The house has been vented for air circulation.

Mr. Rutishauser stated that there was a property deed restriction issued when the property was acquired. The Deed of Conservation Easement requires that access for all is provided at this site. A requirement of the funding of the property is that the parcel must be accessible for all. Other restrictions in the Deed of Conservation Easement include no motorized recreation, no Segways on the walking paths, no billboards, and no cellular towers. The Conservation Easement does not delineate the percentage of uses the facility must have. Mr. Rutishauser stated that the drawing includes a break down at the site, illustrating a total area of 7.11 acres. Passive areas comprise 3.37 acres, or 47.4%; active recreation areas measure 3.07 acres, or 52.6%; and the parking lot measures .67 acres, and was not included as either passive or active space. Ms. Sonenfeld said she thought these numbers were flipped. Mr. Rutishauser agreed and will check them again.

Mr. Rutishauser confirmed Councilwoman Knudsen’s thinking that “open to all” means open to any resident of Bergen County. Councilwoman Knudsen asked if residents of the rest of the State could be prohibited from using the park. Mr. Rutishauser said he would defer to Mr. Rogers, however, he thought that the park would be open to everyone in the State. Councilwoman Knudsen asked if the definition of “active recreation” would mean scheduled events, and “passive recreation” would be considered to be non-scheduled events. Mr. Rutishauser said that he considers all fields to be active, and passive areas would include walking paths and the open area to the west of the Schedler home. The house is considered passive because there are no scheduled activities located in the house at this time, and for the foreseeable future. The playground will be totally ADA accessible, and similar to the playground at Habernickel Farm. It is considered to be a passive recreation area.

Mr. Rutishauser listed the site design features, which include a multi-purpose grass recreational field suitable for use by soccer, football, and lacrosse teams for games and practice. The design calls for the preservation of the house, which is still to be determined. On-site restrooms will be constructed, and a concession stand is being considered for use during games and activities. There will be a fully ADA accessible playground for all children. A 90 foot grass and clay baseball diamond is proposed to be overlayed on the multi-purpose field. The passive areas will have ADA accessible sidewalks, which will be wide enough to be plowed in the winter to provide year round use. In the areas designated for passive use, as much of the existing topography as possible will be preserved, as well as any viable existing trees. The Village plans to plant infill trees in the area where trees are removed. Mr. Rutishauser noted that a parking lot with seventy-four spaces, including two handicapped accessible spaces, will be located at the southern tip of the site next to Route 17. The area along the curb will be widened to provide a drop-off area.

Mr. Rutishauser stated that they are proposing 60 foot tall protective netting along the first base line, which is intended to protect the highway from baseballs. Spectator seating is proposed on either side of the dugout. He pointed out that offsite stormwater will be managed onsite by the rain gardens, and nothing will be piped offsite.

Mr. Rutishauser stated that the passive field is proposed to be located west of the house. It will be kept at existing grade as much as possible. They will attempt to preserve two beautiful hickory trees in this area. A stub has been installed at the northwest corner of the walking path that circumvents the park. This will be for a future connection with the pedestrian bridge that leads to the Park and Ride facility. Trees and fencing are proposed along West Saddle River Road, and along the multi-purpose field. There is an inoperable potable water well on the site that once serviced the house, which will be closed and sealed in accordance with DEP regulations. Mr. Rutishauser concluded by stating that field lighting and artificial turf are not part of the design

Councilwoman Knudsen asked if the playing fields would have to be open to all players from Bergen County. Mr. Rutishauser said that this field will be managed the same way the other fields in Ridgewood are managed. Mr. Cronin explained that if there is open scheduling, the fields can be lent to the County; however, in Ridgewood there are never any open time slots, and he predicts this would be the case with this field. Councilwoman Knudsen inquired about the length of the 60 foot high netting. Mr. Rutishauser said the netting runs from behind home plate to the end of the field, or 300 feet. The netting will be similar to what is in place at Veterans Field.  

Councilwoman Knudsen referred again to use of the field by others in the State, and she asked who would pay for maintenance costs if the fields are used by teams that are not from Ridgewood. Mr. Cronin said that the Village could charge maintenance fees back to the specific organization. This situation has never occurred in Ridgewood, and a resolution or ordinance to implement these charges would have to be adopted by the Village Council. Councilwoman Knudsen said she was surprised to read in the Open Space report that there are 40 adult teams who use fields in Ridgewood. She asked who pays for the field maintenance in this case. Mr. Cronin said that those teams use the fields as is, whenever they play on the weekends.

Mayor Aronsohn stated that because Green Acres funding was used for the purchase of Habernickel Park, it would also be open to any organization in the State. Mr. Cronin indicated that this is the case for any parkland purchased with the help of Green Acres, or Bergen County funding. He noted that the same criterion applies at Grove Park, which is a conservation area. Councilwoman Knudsen wondered if Schedler Park would be more attractive to out of town teams because it would be easily accessible from Route 17. Mr. Cronin said that the Parks and Recreation Department has never encountered this, but it could be a possibility. He emphasized that he would not expect there to be any time available on this field.

Going forward, Mr. Rutishauser stated that they will submit this plan to NJDOT as a courtesy when the design has been finalized. Approval will be needed from the Bergen County Planning Board, and the Bergen County Soil Conservation District, along with a well closure permit from DEP as noted earlier. A courtesy review will be required from the Ridgewood Planning Board, and the Bergen County Open Space Division of the Bergen County Department of Planning and Economic Development.  

Mayor Aronsohn announced that there will be a public hearing on the Bergen County grant application at next week’s meeting. Village professionals will be on hand that evening to answer any questions.

Mr. Cronin recalled that a speaker tonight stated that the concession stand will be a multiple story building. He pointed out that the concession stand is proposed to be a one story building.

Councilwoman Knudsen said that the grant application, and another document from Bergen County, indicates that there will be no lighting. She asked if this was accurate, and Mr. Rutishauser said that lighting is not being considered.

Ms. Sonenfeld reiterated that the open discussion will not end with next week’s public hearing. She said that neither she nor the Village Council has committed $100,000 in taxpayer money. The Village did not front taxpayer money and act as a temporary lender to the RBSA. The Village is not co-mingling funds. Ms. Sonenfeld wanted to clearly repeat that she cannot commit funds without Village Council approval.

Councilwoman Knudsen said that there is reference to a $100,000 municipal capital fund, and she asked if a vote would have been required from the Village Council prior to being noted on the grant application. Ms. Sonenfeld said no, and she explained that the $100,000 that will be presented today may be put into the municipal capital fund. This is what that statement referred to, and they haven’t determined if these funds should be put into either operating expenses, or capital expenses. Ms. Sonenfeld reiterated that no Village funds have been committed.    

Ms. Sonenfeld said that a copy of this report will be put on the Village website. She pointed out that this remains a work in progress.

Mayor Aronsohn thanked everyone for their hard work on the drawings, the report, and the presentation.

4.            DISCUSSION

                a.            Budget

                                1.)           Award Contract – Landfill Disposal of Solid Waste

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is an award for landfill disposal of solid waste. Three bids were picked up and two were received. She recommended that the Village go forward with the low bidder, and pointed out that the low bid is higher than what the Village was previously paying.  

2.)           Award Contract – Line Stop and Valve Insertion Services – Ridgewood Water Department

Ms. Sonenfeld reported that four bids were picked up, and two were received. The low bid was from Carner Brothers, who have previously performed these services. These services are necessary to avoid extended shut downs and “boil water” notices.

                                3.)           Award Contract under Middlesex COOP Contract – Mini Excavator

Ms. Sonenfeld said that this is an award of contract under the Middlesex COOP contract for a mini excavator. Ridgewood recently joined this cooperative, and this was part of the vehicle planning budget.

                                4.)           Award Contract Under State Contract – Equipment and Training

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is an award of contract for weights, cardio equipment, and rubber flooring from the Assistance to Firefighter Grant, which was received by the Fire Department to establish a Wellness and Fitness Program.

                                5.)           Award Contract Under State Contract – Purchase of Snow Plow and Fittings

Ms. Sonenfeld reported that this is for a purchase of snow plow and fittings from Van Dines Motors, in Hackensack. This is a request to exceed the bid threshold. Funds are available from the capital account.  

                                6.)           Award Contract Under State Contract – Parts and Equipment for Traffic Signals

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is a request to extend the bid threshold for the purchase of equipment and parts for the Village’s traffic signals.

7.)           Award Contract Under State Contract – 2016 Ford Dump Truck – Ridgewood Water

Ms. Sonenfeld said this is a resolution to award a contract under State Contract for the purchase of one 2016 Ford F450 Dump Truck to replace an old truck that is not functional.

                                8.)           Award Professional Services Contract – Upgrade of SCADA System

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is a request to award a Professional Services Contract for the upgrade of the SCADA system, which is being done in three phases. This is the most important phase, and involves upgrading the software system in the amount of $181,230.00. The funding is included in the capital budget.

9.)           Accept Donation – Ridgewood Baseball/Softball Association – Grant for Schedler Park

Ms. Sonenfeld said that this resolution would accept the donation from RBSA, which will include some Phase One development work. As Mr. Rutishauser mentioned, the potable water well must be sealed and decommissioned.   In addition, the two car garage, the old garden shed, and debris must be removed. Dead, diseased and storm toppled trees must also be removed as well as uplifted tree root balls. A cut in the proposed parking lot driveway entrance will be made, along with utility stubs for future development at the site. Ms. Sonenfeld stated that she must receive Village Council approval to accept the gift because the gift amount exceeds $5,000. Ms. Sonenfeld reported that she walked the property several weeks ago, and was amazed at the number of dead trees, and the clearing work that needs to be done. Some of the areas were quite dangerous to walk though, which is a safety issue.

Councilwoman Knudsen referred to the Friends of the Schedler house group, and the $45,000 matching grant. In that resolution, it states that as a 501C3, all donations were subject to disclosure. Councilwoman Knudsen asked if the $100,000 donation from RBSA was subject to the same disclosure requirements. Ms. Sonenfeld explained that the Village is not a 501C3 group. Mr. Rogers said he will check into this, but he thinks this may be a requirement for a non- profit group.

Councilman Sedon said he thought that the Village Council should have the discussion before they committed to the details of this project. There could be a perception that something is being rushed through, and it might make more sense to have the Village Council pass the capital budget before proceeding with the development of a park on the Schedler property. If all of this had happened last year and this project was included in the capital budget, not bringing this to the Village Council first would have been fine because it would have been discussed and voted on as part of the capital budget.

Mayor Aronsohn explained that several people, including Councilwoman Knudsen and Ms. Sonenfeld, have said that there could be grant money available for various projects on the Schedler property. Ms. Sonenfeld submitted the application, and then to the Village Council. The Village Council could have said no at that point, or any other point along the way. Councilman Sedon said that he doesn’t disagree with any of the items that were just outlined as necessary. He wanted the point made that these things should have been publically discussed before moving ahead.

Ms. Sonenfeld explained that this procedure is not abnormal and happens all the time. Many times the Village Council doesn’t know until after the fact that the Village has applied for a grant. Several Village employees met with Bergen County earlier this week to discuss this grant. The County stated that it is not their intent to be punitive, and they recognize that additional information can be added to the grant application later, including the resolution. Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is County practice, which has been done before in 2012 and 2013.

Mr. Cronin said he has been involved in grant applications for 35 years, and he has done many State and County grants. This is the way the majority of grants are done. He understands that this is an important grant application, and perhaps more discussion was needed, but due to time constraints, they had to file the application which meant that the resolution had to be in place several weeks ago.

Councilman Pucciarelli stated that he is comfortable with the way the process is going. The Village is trying to get funding from the County, while at the same time considering the options that are available. If and when the funding becomes available, it will be combined with the gift donation from the RBSA.

Mr. Cronin pointed out that the Village will not learn if the grant application is successful until the spring of 2016. Ms. Sonenfeld stated that they were advised at the meeting with the County that the grant requests received by the County have exceeded the money that is available. Ridgewood’s grant request was the second largest they received, and the grant request may have to be reduced, because the money isn’t there. Ms. Sonenfeld doubts that they will be successful in obtaining a $100,000 matching grant from Bergen County, and the item list will have to be revised. Mr. Cronin indicated that the Village Engineer can bid the project out a la carte, and they can reject whatever portion doesn’t fit into the financial package. Ms. Sonenfeld said they could remove the cut out for the driveway, and the electrical utilities.

10.)        Authorize Change Order – Lester Stable/Graydon Pool ADA Ramps

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is a change order for Lester Stable and the Graydon Pool parking lot ADA access sloped ramps. Several mistakes were made in estimating this project, and a change order for $27,000 is necessary. This money is available in capital funds.

                                11.)        Authorize Change Order – Replacement TV Camera for Sewer Jet Truck

Ms. Sonenfeld reported that this resolution will authorize a change order to Jack Doheny Companies to replace a video inspection unit that broke, with one that is of better quality.

12.)        Resolution to Establish 2015 PILOT Fees and Guarantee Bond for Ridgewood Senior Citizen Housing Corporation

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that in lieu of paying taxes, the Ridgewood Senior Citizen Housing Corporation pays an annual service charge to the Village for municipal services. The charge is 6.28% of the annual gross revenues, plus the cost of sanitary sewers, and solid waste collection and disposal. They also give an annual reimbursement of $25,000 to the Village guaranteeing their timely payment of principal and interests. This resolution authorizes the Village Manager to execute the agreement.

13.)        Amend Bond Ordinance – Ridgewood Library – Description and Average Useful Life of Project

Ms. Sonenfeld said that work on the remediation of the oil tank at the Library has been completed at a cost of $25,053.00. The cost of this work was projected to be $51,906.00, which means there is money left over. This money will be used for IT equipment at the Library.  

                                14.)        Appointment of Court-Appointed COAH Master

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that Michael P. Bolan has been appointed to serve as the Special COAH Master at a cost of $225.00 per hour. She understands that they have no choice in this matter, and she added that there is no budget for this service. Mr. Rogers said that this is standard procedure, with regard to the lawsuit that was filed to obtain COAH certification for the affordable housing plan. The Master is usually a professional planner with experience in affordable housing and the housing element. Blais Brancheau, the Village Planner, is familiar with this individual that the Village will have to work with for the duration of this case. Mr. Rogers reminded everyone that the Village is under a court order to complete the housing element by December 8, 2015.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked about the hourly rate for Mr. Bolan. Mr. Rogers said this is a problem because the Master spends an extensive amount of time on the matter, including sitting through the trial. This Special Master advises the Court relative to Ridgewood’s housing element throughout the litigation.

                                15.)        Award Contract Under State Contract – Dodge Charger – Police Department

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this resolution is for the purchase of a Dodge Charger Police Pursuit Vehicle.

                                16.)        Award Second Portion of Contract – Siding Repairs to Traffic & Signal Building

Ms. Sonenfeld said that this resolution will award the contract for the other half of the work on the Traffic & Signal Building which is required, due to the current peeling siding cited in an OSHA report.

                                17.)        Award Contract Under State Contract – Tandem Axle Trailer - OEM

Ms. Sonenfeld said that this is an award of contract under State Contract for a tandem axle trailer for OEM. There are capital funds budgeted for the trailer.

                b.            Policy

                                1.)          Special Service Charge for Voluminous/Extraordinary OPRA Requests

Ms. Sonenfeld said that this is policy for special service charges for voluminous/extraordinary OPRA requests. Ms. Mailander explained that her office receives a large number of OPRA requests at a rate 15% to 20% higher than the previous year. She is recommending that a policy be set for voluminous or extraordinary OPRA requests that exceed 200 pages, or if they take in excess of three hours to fulfill. The charge for the time would be calculated using the lowest rate of the any person in the office even if the work is being done by a person who is paid at a higher rate. Ms. Mailander said that there have been times when the Village Attorney and the Village Labor Attorney have been involved in several OPRA requests, and if used again, their hourly rate would be charged to the person or group making the request. Donna Jackson, Deputy Borough Clerk, has estimated that this special charge would have been necessary three to five times so far during 2015.  

Ms. Sonenfeld asked if the requester would be told that there might be a hefty charge to have their request fulfilled. Ms. Mailander explained that they are required by the Government Records Council Guidelines to provide an estimate of the costs that may occur if the time to complete the request is extraordinary. An estimate would be given prior to making copies and putting in the time, and the requester can agree to or revise their request.

Mayor Aronsohn asked if this was the practice in other municipalities. Ms. Mailander said that most municipalities don’t use this procedure, and don’t get the number of requests that her office is getting. She added that this charge cannot be set by ordinance. Councilman Sedon said that he attended a League of Municipalities meeting where this subject was discussed. He learned that many market research companies are using information about the municipality received as a result of an OPRA request in lieu of hiring someone as a consultant to do the work. He said that this is a common problem, and he agreed that this is a good way to handle this situation.

                c.             Operations

                1.)           Proposed Encroachment Agreement – 257 East Ridgewood Avenue

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is a proposed encroachment agreement at 257 East Ridgewood Avenue. This request to revise the easement, to allow encroachment by a handicapped ramp, has been approved by the Planning Board, and it is subject to approval by the Village Council. The language of the easement does not prohibit encroachment, and the ramp is consistent with the intent of the easement to provide public sidewalk access to the downtown business district.  

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that because PNC Bank did some upgrades to the structure they were subject to the ADA requirements. The Planning Board decided that the scissor ramp option was the better of the two that were presented.

2.)           Endorse Community Development Block Grants

Ms. Sonenfeld noted that there are five block grants that the Village is being requested to endorse. In all cases the applications need to be submitted by Friday, and the resolution will not be prepared or adopted until next Wednesday.

3.)           Endorse Community Development Block Grant – SHARE Inc. – Improvement to and Generators for 104 Cottage Place and 130 Prospect Street

Ms. Sonenfeld explained that this is an endorsement by the Village for back-up generators at both Share locations, as well as repairs to the steps.

4.)           Endorse Community Development Block Grant – West Bergen Mental Healthcare – Replacement of Elevator at 120 Chestnut Street

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is an application for the replacement of outdated and frequently inoperable elevator.

5.)           Endorse Community Development Block Grant – West Bergen Mental Healthcare – Housing Specialist

Ms. Sonenfeld said that this endorsement is for a Housing Specialist for West Bergen Mental Healthcare.

                6.)           Establish Building Department Change Fund

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is the resolution to establish the change fund at the Building Department.

7.)           Endorse Community Development Block Grant – Village of Ridgewood – Ramp at the Gate House (1057 Hillcrest Road) at Irene Habernickel Family Park

Ms. Sonenfeld said that this grant is for a ramp at the Gate House at Habernickel Park.

8.)           Accept and Execute Agreement for Acceptance of Community Development Block Grant – Barrier Free Ramps at The Lester Stable

Ms. Sonenfeld explained that this resolution will accept the grant that was received from Bergen County for Lester Stable.

                9.)           Review of Best Practices Worksheet

Ms. Sonenfeld explained that this is the annual Best Practices worksheet. The scores that are allotted using this worksheet will determine whether or not the Village receives the final 5% of State aid. Ridgewood received a score of 43 which is within the 41 to 50 range that qualifies for the aid. The Village said yes to the removal of longevity for new hires, which garnered extra points. Ms. Sonenfeld recommended that the Village consider saying yes to a written policy on surplus, which could be discussed during the budget cycle. They could consider making pay to play more restrictive, as well as approval of the budget by February 10, 2016.      

                10.)        Amendment to Fine for CBD Employee Parking

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that there is a parking fine of $165.00 charged if someone parks in the CBD lot without a permit. There is no range for the judge to consider, and she recommended this amendment which will add “up to $165.00”, and will give the Judge more flexibility in fining individuals parking illegally.

11.)        Extend Contract Period – Operation and Maintenance of Chestnut Street Dumpster Pad

Ms. Sonenfeld recalled that there was approval for the operation and maintenance of the dumpster done for Conquest. Because some people had prepaid for October, the Village has been asked to change the date to begin the twelve month period from October 1^st to November 1^st.

5.            REVIEW OF OCTOBER 14, 2015 REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

Ms. Mailander stated that next week there would be two proclamations, including National Diabetes Awareness Month, and Recognize Alzheimer’s Awareness Week. There will be a presentation of certificates to the Junior Baseball Champions. There will be a presentation of the concept plan for the Hudson Street Parking Garage from Desman Associates. There will be comments from the public regarding the Village of Ridgewood’s 2015 Bergen County Open Space Trust Fund Municipal Park Improvement and Development Grant Application for the Schedler Park Property – Phase 1.

Ordinances for introduction include: Amend Bond Ordinance – Change in Description and Average Useful Life for the Library; and Amending the Fines for the CBD Employee Parking.

The scheduled Public Hearings include: Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Prohibited Turns at Intersections for Benjamin Franklin Middle School Drop-off; Amend Chapter 174 – Holiday Displays for Display Regulations; Amend Chapter 145 – Fees for Permit Fee for Holiday Displays; Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Establish Stop Sign at Stevens Avenue and Laurel Road; Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Establish Stop Sign at Morningside and Hamilton Roads; Capital Ordinance for Building Repairs to the Traffic and Signal Building.

Resolutions include: Title 59 Approval and Award of Contract for Landfill Disposal of Solid Waste; Title 59 Approval and Award of Contract for Line Stop and Valve Insertion Services – Ridgewood Water; Title 59 Approval and Award Second Portion of Contract for Siding Repairs to the Traffic and Signal Building; Award Contract under State Contract for Equipment and Training – Occupational Wellness and Fitness Program for the Fire Department; Award Contract under State Contract for the Purchase of Snow Plow and Fittings; Award Contract under State Contract for Parts and Equipment for Traffic Signals; Award Contract under State Contract for 2016 Ford Dump Truck for Ridgewood Water; Award Contract under State Contract for Dodge Charger for the Police Department; Award Contract under State Contact for Tandem Axle Trailer for OEM; Award Extraordinary Unspecifiable Service Contract for the Upgrade of the SCADA System; Authorizing Change Order for Lester Stable/Graydon Pool ADA Ramps; Authorizing Change Order for Replacement TV Camera for Sewer Jet Truck; Establishing 2015 PILOT Fees and Guaranteeing Bond for Ridgewood Senior Citizen Housing Corporation; Approving Encroachment Agreement for 257 East Ridgewood Avenue; Endorsing Community Development Block Grant – two for SHARE and two for West Berge Mental Healthcare, and one for the Village of Ridgewood; Accepting and Authorizing the Execution of Agreement for Acceptance of Community Development Block Grant for Barrier-free Ramps at The Lester Stable; Establishing Building Department Change Fund; Approving Policy for Special Service Charge for Voluminous/Extraordinary OPRA Requests; Appointment of Court-Appointed COAH Master; Appointment of Planning Board Member; Accepting Donation from Ridgewood Baseball/Softball Association – Grant for Schedler Park Property; Extending the Contract for the Dumpster Pad at Chestnut Street.    

6.            MANAGER’S REPORT

Ms. Sonenfeld reported that all water restrictions have been lifted. The combination of Stage 4 restrictions and stricter enforcement has resulted in a successful outcome. She thanked the residents who complied with the Stage 4 restrictions, and she encouraged everyone to make water conservation a part of their lifestyles.

Ms. Sonenfeld reported on a chlorine incident which has recently occurred. She said that the Village uses liquid sodium hydrochloride, which is the industry standard, and is measured in parts per millions. The wells at Ridgewood Water shut down at 3.5 parts per million, and at about 2 parts per million a chlorine smell can be detected. DEP guidelines set 4 parts per million as the maximum residual, and EPA guidelines require notification to consumers if that number has been exceeded within the past 30 days. At one point last week, Ridgewood Water hit 5 parts per million because chlorine had been over pumped. Ms. Sonenfeld indicated that the other issue was that the system did not shut down, and the notification did not come to the central area. This incident only impacted a certain amount of the population since this incident occurred at Twinney well, but the Village decided to go forward with a robo call to all residents.    

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that all NJDEP and USEPA protocol was followed. There were no violations, the system was flushed, and the Twinney well was up again by 5:00 P.M. yesterday. There is no hazardous public health issue. She included in the email notice that she felt this was a customer service issue, and that the notice should have gone out a few hours earlier. Ms. Sonenfeld reiterated that they have 30 days to get the notice out as per EPA guidelines, but the notice was out within 24 hours of the incident occurring. She asked anyone who did not receive a reverse call to go onto the website to sign up for these notifications.

Ms. Sonenfeld said that systems maintenance will begin on October 19^th, which means that fire hydrants will be flushed and operated at a high velocity, which could temporarily discolor the water. This is not a health risk, but residents may not want to do laundry. Residents in areas of impending work will be notified by Swift Reach, and there will be maps of work locations on the Village website.

Regarding Bergen County collaboration, Ms. Sonenfeld stated that discussions have begun with the person who has recently been placed in the Shared Services role. They will be meeting with him in the next several weeks to discuss the Fleet Garage to determine how they would handle mulching. She will have more reports in the future.

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that there have been several police retirements. Paul Denice retired on October 1^st after thirty-one years of service; and Mark Butler retired on October 1^st, after thirty-two and a half years of service. She thanked them for their efforts to keep the community safe.

Ms. Sonenfeld said that she had attended “Good Life Ridgewood” which was a fabulous health and wellness event. She thanked Councilwoman Hauck and her team for an extraordinary job.

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that some time ago, residents on West Glen Avenue attended a meeting to complain about the curbs. Ms. Sonenfeld said that the curb project, which also helps the drainage issue, has now been completed.

Ms. Sonenfeld said that Meet the Manager is scheduled for Saturday, October 17^th from 9:00 A.M. to noon.

Upcoming Events: Ms. Sonenfeld said that the Village Farmer’s Market is open every Sunday from 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M., and continues through November. Backwoods which was postponed last week, has been rescheduled for Saturday, October 10^th. Ms. Sonenfeld announced that Village Hall and the Stable offices will be closed on Monday in observance of Columbus Day, and sanitation and recycling services will be suspended.

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that Tuesday, October 13^th is the last day to register to vote in the November 3^rd election. Registration takes place in the Village Clerk’s office from 9:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. The Village Clerk will be in the lobby of the Library from 4:30 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. to register voters.

Ms. Sonenfeld announced that there will be an Open House at Fire Headquarters on Sunday, October 18^th, from 1:30 P.M. to 3:30 P.M. There will be demonstrations and fire extinguisher training. The rain date is October 25^th.

7.            VILLAGE COUNCIL REPORTS

Planning Board – Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the Master Plan Re-examination is continuing with discussion of the Open Space Plan. Recommendations include an updated Open Space and Recreation Plan to include components of the 2008 CMX plan and the 2010 plan. It was recommended that the Board consider various open space acquisitions and facility improvements since the last plan. This would provide guidance for future acquisitions and improvements. The Land Use Planning Community Facilities Plan is inconsistent with the 2003 plan and will require updating. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the Master Plan re-examination should be finished by February 2016, when it will be due for submission.    

Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) – Councilwoman Knudsen reported that the Historic Preservation Commission meets tomorrow night. The meeting will feature a presentation of the Hudson Street Parking garage and feedback from the HPC. The parking garage will be located in the historic Central Business District and it is important to maintain the historic component which defines the character of the Village.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that there are two minor residential applications, and some signage applications on tomorrow night’s agenda. Regarding the recent razing of several iconic homes in the Village, Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the Historic Preservation Commission will be discussing the strengthening of guidelines, which could prevent the future razing of such structures.  

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the Great Chicago Fire of 1871 will be commemorated as part of Fire Prevention Week, which takes place this week. She and Councilman Pucciarelli attended the Fire Prevention Luncheon today at the Fire House along with Village staff, fire fighters, and representatives from the Village schools. She learned that the Fire Department conducts fire drills at all of the schools where they are timed for their responsiveness. An award is made to the school with the greatest improvement over the prior year, and this year, the classic Fire Helmet Trophy was awarded to Willard School, which beat last year’s time by 29 seconds. Councilwoman Knudsen congratulated Willard School Principal, Caroline Hoffman, her staff, and the students. Councilwoman Knudsen added that she is the official Council spokesperson for the Ridgewood Fire Department Adopt a Hydrant Program. She stated that the fire hydrants are very important to the Fire Department to save lives, prevent property damage, and save woodlands. Fire hydrants can be blocked by vehicles or garbage cans, and be obscured by leaf piles and snow. She urged residents to participate in the Adopt a Hydrant program, which requires that you clear debris, leaves and snow from the closest hydrant to your home. Any damage, missing caps, or leaks must also be reported. There is information on the Ridgewood Fire Department website for anyone wishing to participate in the program.

Councilwoman Knudsen thanked Fire Chief Van Goor for hosting the luncheon today and she offered a special thanks to Dolores and Patti for their special home baked cookies, some of which were packed for all Councilmembers to enjoy during Closed Session.

Interfaith Breakfast – Councilman Pucciarelli thanked Mayor Aronsohn for inviting him to the Interfaith Breakfast on Tuesday, which was attended by local clergy from various religious establishments.

Ridgewood Arts Council – Councilman Pucciarelli stated that the Arts Council is planning a gala on January 31^st in the Village Hall that will have the look and feel of a museum opening. There will be more information forthcoming.  

Library – Councilman Pucciarelli reported that the Library Foundation event is a week from Saturday. The theme is “Mad Men” and this event will take place in the Library. This is a major fund raiser for the Library and there are tickets available.

Councilman Pucciarelli stated that the Library is conducting a series of meetings with their architect. They are developing some creative new approaches as to what a library is, and everyone will be very excited to see the plans for the library renovations. The support of the Library Foundation can bring these plans to fruition.  

Central Business District Forum #9 – Councilman Pucciarelli said that the ninth Central Business District forum will take place, but he is not sure when and where, because there are so many events on the calendar in October. The topic will be the parking garage, and he hopes they will be able to see what more fully developed plans will look like at that meeting.  

Health Fair – Councilwoman Hauck reported on the success of the Health Fair, which was attended by over eight hundred people. There were seventy vendors in seventy tents, along with four performing groups. Janna D’Orio took over the reins of the event, and managed a crew consisting of Elise Marriage, Michael Picston, and Aidan Walsh, and she thanked them for arranging the first Health Fair.  

Volunteer Ridgewood - Councilwoman Hauck said that she is trying to put together a program that would better acquaint those interested in volunteering with the various opportunities that exist. She is considering a program that would allow people to volunteer for certain chores on an hourly basis, or for a specific event. Councilwoman Hauck will be debuting a website that will feature all of the volunteer opportunities available in the Village. The website called “Volunteer Ridgewood” will bring people and needs together, and people will be able to find opportunities that will fit into their lifestyles no matter how busy they are. The website will contain icons for people to click on, which will take them to another page listing events to be uploaded by different organizations, who are interested in being part of the clearing house. Councilwoman Hauck said that she hopes this will be a service that will reignite the spirit of volunteering to enhance a sense of community.

Mayor Aronsohn commented that the Health Fair/Good Life Ridgewood was an extraordinary event. The event included physical, mental and spiritual health, and included vendors of all types. He thanked everyone who participated in the event and made it happen.  

Access Ridgewood – Mayor Aronsohn stated that it is the seventh anniversary of Access Ridgewood, which is the disability awareness program that will take place on October 16^th, 17^th, and 18^th. There are many programs involving the schools, senior citizens, a teen dance, a fashion show featuring children with special needs, special performances, and a specialty program by Ridgewood Soccer Association with assistance from the Fire and Police Departments. There is also a wonderful interfaith service on Sunday, and more information will be forthcoming on these events.  

8.            COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Aronsohn stated they would again have comments from the public and asked anyone wishing to address the Village Council to come forward.

Charles Nowinski, 2 Betty Court, said he wanted to apologize if he offended any Councilmembers. His hope is that through this process they will become more aware of what is going on. He said he has made inquiries and an acoustic expert to conduct a sound study would only cost $3,500. They have to keep in mind that it is not the conditions now that they should be concerned about, but the future conditions after the park is developed. Between 5:00 P.M. and 7:30 P.M., the neighborhood will have an additional 75 cars entering and exiting this parking lot onto West Saddle River Road. Mr. Nowinski   said that he feels he is making valid points, and he asked the Village Council to use their best judgment in this matter, and do the right thing.

Councilwoman Hauck said that even though she understands that people get passionate, it is much easier to digest a calm voice. She thanked Mr. Nowinski for his apology.

John Braden, 328 Queens Court, stated that there was a previous Chairman of the Planning Board. Mr. Braden lives in the Schedler Park area, and he recommended the purchase of this property in 2008. The park was purchased using encumbering funds, which he advised against. He stated that there are four issues for consideration by the Village Council. These conditions include the discussion of the fields, which is comprised not only of field usage, but of orientation of the fields. The second is safety, which includes acoustics. Sound readings could be checked by an engineer located on the island that separates the northbound exit onto Route 17, and the southbound exit onto West Saddle River Road. The engineer would repeat this process at twenty paces in order to get an idea of what the sound is without the trees. Mr. Braden said that the sound barrier wall was stopped in that location because of the grinding of the trucks coming up the hill. The State decided it was not of material value to suppress the sound once the trucks reached the flat surface, which is opposite Old Paramus Church, and the gas station beyond. Mr. Braden has given the Engineering Department eight different items that he would recommend for review regarding safety, which they have agreed to consider.

Mr. Braden said that the third item is improvements, pertaining to the house. He said that the house cannot be used even if it was renovated in its current state. The stairs are very narrow, and the steps are not to code. The Village is facing a litigation nightmare with this building, and there is also the question of the load bearing capacity.

Mr. Braden said he applauds the idea of the concession stand, with a meeting room on the second floor. It would give the east side of the Village the ability to have a meeting room, but not at the expense of trying to retrofit a totally unsuitable building. Mr. Braden stated that the Engineering Department is doing a good job of considering traffic control. He stated again that saving the house is not a good idea.  

Doreen Regina, 540 Bennington Terrace, asked if there was a procedure that residents should use to have their questions addressed by the Engineering Department, and other Village departments. Mayor Aronsohn said that questions should be emailed to the Village Manager, who will forward them to the right person. He stated that there will be a public hearing about the grant application next week. Village professionals will be on-hand to answer questions at that meeting.  

Ms. Regina referred to the RBSA donation, and suggested that there be full disclosure relative to where the gift is coming from and if it consists of private donations to the RBSA. There must be a record of who is paying who for what, and accountability. They also need to know whether it is a small group of people who have authority over the entire project, which is supposed to be for the benefit of the entire community, especially those residing in the Schedler Park area. To summarize, Ms. Regina stated that they must be aware of who is donating what, and who is controlling what is being done at the park. Ms. Regina said that neighborhood residents have an idea of what they would like, and what they think would be appropriate.

Ms. Regina referred to an email from Patty Infantino, which was read and commented on by Don Delzio. She asked the Village Council and the Village Manager if they knew who forwarded the email. She asked if an OPRA request had been submitted to obtain this email. Ms. Regina was under the impression that this was a private email that was sent, and she was concerned because she has also sent private emails regarding the Schedler proposal.  

Susan Clayville, 399 Queens Court, asked how to get the Schedler neighborhood involved in this process in order to come up with a solution. Mayor Aronsohn said that there are ways to get involved, including attending these meetings, and reaching out to the Parks and Recreation Committee.

Councilman Sedon asked if a committee could be formed comprised of the sports groups and interested residents to resolve these issues. Mayor Aronsohn referred to the Habernickel model, which was handled through the Parks and Recreation department, and he said it would make sense to use that model. Councilwoman Hauck said it would be more efficient to use the Parks, Recreation and Conservation Board because they have this type of experience and have easy access to the Village Council. Involving the residents in the process could be a great way to resolve the issues.

Michelle Italia, 3 Betty Court, stated that she attended all of the Open Space meetings that took place. There were several meetings held at the Glen School, as well as meetings held in the courtroom of Village Hall. There were sports members attending these meetings, who indicated that they would not contribute funds, or agree to acquire the Schedler property unless a 90 foot field was built. Many community members who attended these meetings understood the need for a park, but they also realized, and indicated overwhelmingly, that they would favor a field which was balanced, and could be handled by the neighborhood. This is a unique property on one small street, with an adjacent highway. This Village Council has endorsed a plan to clear five acres of land on a seven acre property. Ms. Italia reiterated that a majority of those attending the Open Space meetings were not in favor of a 90 foot field.  

Ms. Italia also referred to the email from Patty Infantino. She said that Mr. Delzio was given this letter without OPRA, which is not right if it was only addressed to the Village Council, and no one else.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, said he received a call from the Deputy Village Clerk yesterday, who indicated that the proposed policy on voluminous/extraordinary OPRA requests was already in effect. He was told that an OPRA request he had made would take a considerable amount of time, and that there would be a charge. Mr. Loving expressed concern, and he wondered if this is a new way to discourage people from making these requests. He questioned how he would know whether or not an OPRA request would take an entire day or only five minutes to complete. He said that there must be a system of checks and balances in effect here.

Mr. Loving referred to the statement that there would be no tax impact to homeowners relative to the proposed parking garage. He asked if the report contained any reference to the allocation of parking utility revenues. He recalled that a portion of the parking utility revenues pay for different things in various departments. He stated that a portion of the Police Department is funded through parking revenues, and he asked if the allocation table is being changed from what presently exists to what it will be when the parking garage becomes operational. He reiterated that the report must be reviewed to see whether the allocation tables are changing because if those tables change, it means that the money has to come from another source.

Mr. Loving spoke about Mr. Sullivan’s comment earlier in the meeting that it is inappropriate for members of the public to come before the Village Council to talk about high density housing. He thought it was a better idea to send Councilmembers private emails. Mr. Loving said he strongly disagrees, because property taxes can be the largest budget item for some residents, and the Village Council has been elected to oversee the spending of taxpayer money. Residents have every right to attend Council meetings to question and comment on Village policy, and how their money is being spent. Mr. Loving stated that sending private emails to a Councilmember to avoid public discourse will not happen or be tolerated.

Allen Dlugasch, 3 Betty Court, said it is frustrating to think it is 1:30 A.M., and he is begging the Village Council to protect his life’s biggest investment, his home. People in his neighborhood are trying to describe to the Village Council what it is like to live on this island. He never could have imagined he would be trying to protect his neighborhood against a 90 foot baseball field, with a 72 space parking lot, and a little park. Mr. Dlugasch said that the entire argument centers on the size of the field, and the RBSA has indicated that the size of the field is not negotiable. The neighborhood would be happy to accept a 60 foot field, which would result in less tree removal, less traffic, a smaller parking lot, and fewer concerns about safety. The residents who have spoken on the Schedler Park have invested in the east side of the Village, and he asked the Village Council to put themselves in the place of residents in this neighborhood. The Village Council must give this a lot of thought. Taking a chance and going forward with the park as proposed is scary for Mr. Dlugasch, who is vested in the neighborhood with an $800,000 house. Going forward with the development of the Schedler property could well be a mistake, which if made, can never be corrected

9.            RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

Ms. Mailander read Resolution #15-307 to go into Closed Session as follows: