• Home
  • Clerk Minutes

20180905 Village Council Work Session

A REGULAR WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOD, NEW JERSEY ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2018 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

  1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG    SALUTE

Mayor Hache called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call the following were present: Councilwoman Knudsen, Councilman Sedon, Councilman Voigt, Councilwoman Walsh, and Mayor Hache.  Also present were Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; and Donna Jackson, Deputy Village Clerk. 

Mayor Hache led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag as well as in a Moment of Silence to honor the brave men and women serving in our armed forces and all our first responders.

  1. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Alexander Ruhl, 322 Crest Road, a Senior at Ridgewood High School, stated that he wanted to present a change to the Village of Ridgewood ordinance regarding Article III Section 105-18 in regard to poultry and fowl. He stated that he is an owner of seven chickens for the past five years, and he was proposing a change due to the limitations of the ordinance as it stands. Mr. Ruhl stated that the biggest limitation was regarding the location requirements for the chicken coop, as there are many benefits for backyard and suburban chickens such as eggs and the excrement that acts as a fertilizer. He added that the chickens are a chemical free pest control as well.

Mr. Ruhl stated that currently the ordinance states that no coop would be allowed within seventy-five feet of any living dwelling and also has to be located ten feet from the property line. He stated that he would like to change this to fifty feet from any neighboring dwelling with no specifications regarding their own property as well as keeping the ten feet from any property line restriction. He stated the reason for this change was that he also wanted to limit the number of chickens that anyone can own at one time. Currently, it is an unlimited amount of chickens that anyone can own and he would propose to limit this to fifteen chickens. Mr. Ruhl stated that he didn’t have the time to explain all of his proposed amendments, but added that was the biggest recommendation he had.

Mr. Ruhl stated that other towns that had ordinances similar to what he was proposing were Montclair. The coop has to be fifty feet from windows and doors of neighboring dwellings with no specifications of neighboring property. Essex Fells has no specific ordinance in regard to location of the coop. He asked if any Councilmembers had any questions.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she would look over the handout that Mr. Ruhl provided, adding that she was pretty confident she supported these changes. Councilwoman Walsh thanked him for his presentation and stated that she had been speaking with Dawn Cetrulo about having chickens in her own backyard. She agreed with some of the proposed changes because there is a challenge because of the size of the lots in terms of the backyard. She added that it would be great for more people in Ridgewood to be able to have chickens.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked how many eggs Mr. Ruhl collected per day. Mr. Ruhl stated that he collects four eggs per day with his seven chickens and added that they have a special membrane on the eggs that can help them stay fresh in the refrigerator for up to a month.

Pamela Perron, 123 Kenilworth Road, stated she had been studying the proposal for the expansion of the parking lot at the train station, adding that certain things seemed unclear. She stated that her understanding regarding the expansion was that the inspiration was from a parking lot in Hoboken where the parking spots were set parallel rather than angled so that people would back into them and therefore leaving the parking space would be safer. She stated that she didn’t see any mention of this in the plan, whether backing in would be required. Ms. Perron stated that she felt that perpendicular parking would be so disorienting and unfamiliar that it will cause congestion and thereby diminish safety for pedestrians and other cars.

Ms. Perron added that the plan mentioned fifteen trees that are to be removed and she counted seven trees on the green island and she asked if the other eight were to be cut down at Wilsey Square or from the green strip that faces Pease Library. She asked if it meant that with this expansion would destroy the handsome stone round tree wells that are seen as you come up Garber from the east side of town. She asked if the trees were in poor health, was that synonymous with hazardous. If they were hazardous, should they be taken down immediately or if in poor health, perhaps they should be nurtured back to health. Ms. Perron added that eleven red oaks would be spreading their shade over cars and she assumed that oaks had acorns. If she had a new car she wouldn’t want acorns falling on her car.

Ms. Perron stated that she would prefer to see the island left and improved as a park to attract people. We should be fostering walking, biking, and taking advantage of the public space in our town. She stated that Chicago does a beautiful job of inviting people to enjoy the public spaces and we could do that here, as well. She added that she would rather see the $330,000 used to subsidize the Uber people who presented within the last year.

Ellie Gruber, 229 South Irving Street, stated that she was here to thank the Council for putting the Zabriskie resolution on the agenda and for the fast action at Kings Pond as that is really appreciated. She added that she was here to talk about the Dunham Trail which is one-fifth of a mile between Spring and Grove Street. Ms. Gruber stated that it is heavily used and has been terrible degraded through urban stream degradation. She added that it was shameful the way that neighbors were dumping debris in the area of Dunham Trail. She shared some pictures of landscape material, evergreen bushes, poles, cement and rocks, and added that this was clearly left by the abutting homeowners.

Ms. Gruber stated that it was impossible to walk on the trail itself, as it is twelve inches wide in some spots because of erosion. She added that it was not within the town budget and she needed advice for Ridgewood Wildscape as to how to stop the neighbors from dumping. They placed door hangers and there has been more dumping in the area. She urged the Village Council to take a walk on the trail, as homeowners from the abutting streets of Arden Court and Hawthorne Place are dragging stuff to the trail.

Saurabh Dani, 390 Bedford Road, stated that he supported the train station parking lot improvements and his only question was regarding the budget. He stated that when it was presented by the Village Engineer, one of the Councilmembers asked for the proposed expenses or costs, and it was stated in the low two hundred thousand dollars. However, the bond is for $330,000 and he didn’t not know where the new amount was coming from. Mr. Dani stated that he had recently started looking at the school budgets and what he has started seeing is that money for capital projects that is surplus becomes house money and then is used for something else. He added that if the Village Council thinks the amount can go up over the original proposed amount, maybe they should bond in two separate installments to avoid paying interest on the full amount. He suggested that the Village does something where they don’t have to borrow more than it needs and then it becomes a situation where the money is spent somewhere else because it is there.

Edward Sansone, 143 Somerville Road, asked why the Village residents weren’t getting to vote for the parking garage. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the Village Council has the authority to vote on a bond ordinance to support funding of the garage. There were two votes, one non-binding and one binding, with the last one on June 21, 2016 which was for the bond ordinance on a different size garage and location was defeated. She added that at this time, unless there was a petition brought forward in opposition to the bond, that would be the only mechanism to allow the voters an opportunity to weigh in on this discussion. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that at this point there was no petition that they were aware of and they were past the window of opportunity at this time. She added that she or the Mayor would be happy to explain further by email. Mr. Sansone stated that he has a plan for a garage in the center of town that would cost next to nothing and hold one hundred cars, which he provided to the Village Councilmembers. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that these plans referred to a Walnut Street parking area that she has spoken with Mr. Sansone about.

There were no additional public comments. Mayor Hache stated that there was a question about the train station parking lot and whether cars would be required to back into the spots. He stated that at this time, there has been no indication from the Engineering or Police Departments regarding this. As far as the location and replacement of the trees, he did not know the exact location but would get back to Ms. Perron regarding the layout of the trees. Mayor Hache added that regarding the estimated costs and why the train station reconfiguration ballooned from $200,000 to $330,000 he asked Ms. Mailander if there was any indication as to why this occurred. Ms. Mailander stated that part of this inflation was the bonding cost itself which is about another $30,000.

Mr. Rutishauser stated that the estimate for construction was based on the bid results that were received for the current paving projects, which is how they came up with the $330,000 number which is being used for bonding purchases at this time. He added that they were currently in negotiations with the paving contractor to see if they would do the work at the prices they had bid as the have a right to refuse it because it is a substantial addition to their contract. If they refuse, the project would be bid out and prices may go up or come down as a result. Mr. Rutishauser stated that they were required by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to plant trees, and the Village provided historic documentation that there were a number of oak trees at that location 100 to 120 years ago. His office created drawings which show the approximate locations of trees and also the approximate count of trees that they would install, which was approved by SHPO. Mayor Hache stated that the renderings were posted on the Village website.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that Ms. Perron stated that the space should be left the way it is with the wide grassy area. She added the existing design was never approved by SHPO, and added this was why the tact was being taken with this design. Mr. Rutishauser stated that the current configuration of the train station happened when NJ Transit did the ADA acceptable high level platforms. There was a specialist on their team that supposedly interfaced with SHPO. However, they were not aware of anything that NJ Transit had done and felt that the tinted concrete that was installed was ghastly. The condition that was approved by SHPO is that they would like the sidewalk down the center of the island to be tinted as dark as possible.

Councilman Sedon stated that oak trees do have acorns and he was wondering if the Village was wedded to the oak trees and whether there could be an alternative. Mr. Rutishauser stated that SHPO does specifically state oak trees, but if the Village Council would like a change he could submit a request to SHPO. Councilman Sedon added that it was a good point that was brought up because acorns would stain new paint and cars. Mr. Rutishauser stated that a pin oak tree was planted by the Rotary clock near Van Neste Square, which has been in for ten to twelve years and he has yet to hear a complaint about acorns. He added that he has oak trees on his property and that they do not produce acorns every year.

  1. PRESENTATION
  1. Parking – Walker Report – Preliminary Financial Analysis - Garage

Bob Rooney, CFO and Parking Utility Director, gave a brief history regarding the parking garage. He stated that after approving and adopting the ordinance for a $12 million parking garage on Hudson Street, the Village looked to Acacia to help understand what debt service requirements could be used to finance the garage and what would make sense. Acacia came up with six scenarios in their presentation to the Village Council. Four were then selected to present to Walker as options for financing the garage. The scenarios were: level debt service payments for 30 years; defer principle to 2021 with level debt service thereafter; deferred principle to 2021, one year capitalized interest, level debt service thereafter; and deferred principle to 2021, one year capitalized interest, level debt service thereafter with level debt service to 2023.

Mr. Rooney stated he had a conversation with Walker and Carolyn Krasnow regarding the scenarios and their rationales. This parking garage is going to be self-sustaining, so they need to time the rate increases appropriately to maintain the balance of appropriate debt service and maintain the balance from year to year. Ms. Krasnow then generated numerous financial presentations from that information.

Ms. Krasnow stated that the goal of the study is for the parking system to be self-sustaining, so their study is geared to figure out what structure of rate increases are needed to make sure that can happen. She stated that the six block area between Franklin on the North, Walnut on the East, Dayton on the South, and Broad on the West is the study area that includes 292 off-street spaces in the Walnut, Chestnut, Hudson and Prospect lots. Occupancy counts were done in those lots and they were found to be 94% occupied on a weekday, and 95% occupied in the evening on the weekend. Ms. Krasnow stated that on-street there were 254 spaces, 98% occupied on a weekday and 98% occupied in the afternoon and evening on a weekend. This gave Walker a baseline to see what the rate increases are going to mean by creating a model of how the parking demand translates into the revenue that the Village is currently earning which is the majority of the revenue stream that will grow. Ms. Krasnow stated that they also considered new revenues that would come into the parking system and have been conservative in that there will most likely be additional cars coming into the area to dine and shop when parking opens up. This amount was not considered in the additional revenue, nor were the new developments that may bring additional visitors to the area.

Ms. Krasnow stated that they considered a current trend where retail converts to restaurants, as restaurants are much denser generators of revenue. As a result of the current businesses, and amount of restaurants, they have left it at the current mix of stores and restaurants. She stated that the new generators that they see coming on line are the result of parking lots that have been used that are already out of service; the Brogan Lot for commuters assuming that most of that goes into the garage with a couple turns a day from those parkers; and the Ken Smith Motors Lot, which had been used for employee permits so they assumed that permit system will transfer over to the garage. Ms. Krasnow stated that lots that were here would then be shifting demand into the garage.

She stated that a lot of the support for the debt service comes from the rate increases that they’ve been looking at. They have looked at what rate increase it takes at what point to get to a debt service coverage ratio of 1, which is required by the Village. Ms. Krasnow stated that the summary of what they see the rate increase is needed to be, is present in a handout that she provided. The table shows at what year the rate increase would need to occur and that varies by scenario. She reviewed the rate increases by scenario as each debt service scenario has its own rate escalation. Ms. Krasnow felt that the alternate scenario that the Village had asked her to look at, with a differential between on-street and off-street parking, is a great thing to do but because on-street parking is such a huge component of revenue it means that the rates would have to be increased earlier in that scenario. She added that this scenario was a great thing to do in terms of parking management because on-street parking is so popular. So, if you create that rate difference you give some percentage of parkers an impetus to use off-street parking which creates a better balance and reduces the circling that some people do to get that perfect spot.

Ms. Krasnow stated that the goal has been to give the Village a fairly conservative approach in terms of not getting crazy about new revenue streams, having assumed a drop in demand with each rate increase, because they want to show the Village where this can be. They want to show there is potential; that the Village doesn’t need to escalate this quickly; and that they do get new demand streams. She stated that there is potential that the Village does not experience much of a drop in demand associated with the rate increase, and if these things happen, the Village may be able create do these rate increases more slowly than they have projected. She stated that they are expecting a surplus after rates are increased in twenty-five cent intervals. They are projecting that there will be a cash surplus, and she suggested that the financial advisor may have suggestions for what to do with that surplus.

Councilman Sedon asked Ms. Krasnow if she took into consideration the possibility of any revenue increase because the Village is piloting kiosks as a replacement for meter heads in certain parking areas. He stated that other towns have seen an increase because of excess time being left on the meter and with the kiosk that time is essentially lost. Ms. Krasnow stated that they did not account for that in the projections, but they know that Parkmobile is in use which is a different version and that is part of the parking system. Mr. Rooney added that they didn’t go into this with Walker because Chestnut Street was kiosk versus Parkmobile. Since there hadn’t been any meters, there was no history there. Now that there are kiosks as opposed to meters, they can assess the numbers in a few months and then they can modify the scenarios as necessary at that time. Councilman Sedon stated that if there is any increase in revenue at that time, then that can go into either staving off or slowing down any rate increases.

Mayor Hache stated that if the kiosks perform the way they are supposed to with a 20% increase, based on the on-street and off-street meters, it should be an additional $1.3 million over the next seven years. Mr. Rooney stated that excess could be held as a stabilization for future rate increase, debt service, or maintenance reserve.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she was interested in understanding how the recapture was reflected, so she was glad that wasn’t done as it was a conservative approach and she appreciated that.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that the report was easy to understand in terms of the scenarios. She added that her questions were regarding the Brogan and Ken Smith sites, and how they were factored in as a shift to either the other lots or Uber/Lyft. Councilwoman Walsh asked what Ms. Krasnow was thinking would happen with those cars. Ms. Krasnow stated that from the volume that they estimated, they assumed that 15% would go away and find some kind of alternative by the time the garage opens. Councilwoman Walsh stated that her concern was that she didn’t want it to be a shift to fill the garage, as it is meant to be for commuters, diners, and shoppers, so the feel that this scenario reflects that differing use within the garage was her concern. Ms. Krasnow stated that based on the patterns, she thinks the people using those lots probably were commuters during the day and then restaurant goers at night. They were doing that because parking was constrained, but the new parking becomes an amenity for commuters and restaurant goers, wherever they are parking currently.

Councilman Voigt stated that looking at the debt service on the projections, the debt service coverage ratio seems to be greater than one in practically ever instance, and he asked why it wasn’t kept closer to one. Ms. Krasnow stated that was due to the twenty-five cent rate increase, and to keep it very close to one the increases would be fifteen cents or odd numbers. Councilman Voigt asked if slowing down the rate increases to keep it closer to one would work. Ms. Krasnow stated that it probably would. Councilman Voigt stated that there was a cash surplus every year and that it seemed to grow over time. He asked if that surplus was generally used for various things in the town, would that mean it would be kept in an account to be used for parking, or for other things. Mr. Rooney stated that the surplus that is generated can be either used to bring other funds to balance, to stay there to make certain that there is sufficient money for unforeseen circumstances, and as they progress each year Council will have a chance to look at that and see how they want to treat it.

Councilman Voigt questioned how much the hangtags were increased per year. Mayor Hache stated that they were increased by twenty-five dollars per year. Councilman Voigt stated that he was curious as to why they didn’t look at increasing those rates more aggressively, and it seemed to him that there was a demand for parking closer to the train station and he thought it should be looked at to increase those more aggressively over time as the Village sells out of those quickly. Mr. Rooney stated that Councilman Voigt’s suggestion made sense, and that there were increases in demand over certain years and it can be balanced over certain years and impact the rate increase and the timing of the rate increase.

Mayor Hache stated that in the Executive Summary, the chart about the differentiated rate scenarios talks about debt service scenarios and the years that in the increase would take place for on-street and off-street, and asked what the differential was for the off-street parking rates. He asked whether it was a fixed differential. Ms. Krasnow stated that in that instance, under debt service scenario one, everything goes to seventy-five cents in 2018, the on-street in scenario one would go to $1.00 in 2019 but the off-street wouldn’t go to $1.00 until 2027.

Mayor Hache stated that when looking at the different debt service scenarios, part of the reason the Village asked Acacia to look at different scenarios because they wanted to look at the ways to build up a sizeable cash reserve early in the process. He added that the goal was to defer principle and capitalize on interest to build up on that reserve, but it seems like in the analysis they are getting different meter rates. So, the net revenue changes depending on the debt service scenario. He asked why this was increasing the debt service subtotals. Ms. Krasnow stated that they were going about the study to show when the Village really needs to do those rate increases, and if the Council wanted to do those increases on a more aggressive schedule to build up cash reserves that it’s perfectly fine. She stated that their goal was to show how to get to a coverage of one and to delay the increases as long as possible, showing how long they could be delayed and still keep to the debt service coverage ratio. Mayor Hache stated that with scenario one with traditional financing, they could have a much bigger cash surplus and might not even require the increases as early as 2019, to which Ms. Krasnow was in agreement.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked whether the differential from on-street to off-street causes the street parking fees to accelerate at a faster pace. Ms. Krasnow stated that was correct. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that they have to be cognizant as to how they approach that so as not to be priced out. Ms. Krasnow stated that was correct, as the on-street parking was the biggest revenue stream, so the Village needs that rate increase to balance out the slower increase of the off-street.

Councilman Voigt stated that he looked at the parking revenues in the quarterly reports and it seems to be short in the past six months, and projecting that number through the year they are probably $100,000 short every year. He asked how that was going to be reconciled as they are projecting $1.4 million at the end of this year and the report has more than $1.4 million. Mr. Rooney stated that with Parkmobile there are now no transaction fees, so that’s about $40,000. The rate increase over the next four months of revenue, and based upon the comparison to last year the percentage is about the same as of June 30th. So, he thinks they are going to get to where they need to be. Mr. Rooney stated that he spoke to Ms. Krasnow and let her know where the Village stood.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that to Councilman Voigt’s point, Parkmobile should already be kicking in and that revenue stream should already be coming back into the coffers. Mr. Rooney stated that Parkmobile forgot to change the contract so they had to write a check to the Village which was received this month for the retroactive amount. They went retroactive to June 1 according to Mr. Rooney. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she thought that it was done in February or March as the Council told Parkmobile to terminate the agreement in December 2017 and then there was the two month window. Mr. Rooney stated that he would check again and get the official date for Councilwoman Knudsen. Mayor Hache stated that the contract renewal was the end of February. There was a brief discussion on the dates and Mr. Rooney agreed to check the dates.

  1. Ridgewood Water – Results of SUEZ Water Quality Study

Rich Calbi, Director of Ridgewood Water, stated that in Spring 2017 he was before the Village Council about a Notice they received about Suez Water’s intention to change their treatment at the Haworth plant as they were adding a corrosion prohibitor for their water that they hadn’t used before as well as other methods of treatment. Ridgewood Water became concerned about how that would effect Ridgewood Water as they do purchase a large amount from Suez especially during the summer months of peak usage. At that time, Ridgewood Water was successful based on some study work to delay Suez in implementation of that treatment to October. During that time, Ridgewood Water worked with Mott MacDonald to test the water in detail. Mr. Calbi stated that he was there to discuss the recommendations and how they were planning to monitor the water, adding that in particular they were looking at the effect on lead and copper corrosion but also pay attention to other water quality parameters including taste, water, and color.

Mr. Calbi introduced John Savardi from Mott MacDonald, adding that he has been working as an engineer in the field of water for over 30 years and he used to live in Paramus and is familiar with Ridgewood. He has worked primarily in the area of water quality and corrosion, spearheading the work in Washington, D.C. and Pittsburgh.

Mr. Savardi stated that they engaged another technical expert on this project in Process Research Solutions to supplement their strength, as well as working with Suez Water as this was a collaborative approach with monthly conference calls and sharing of data. He stated that this presentation represents the better part of a year’s worth of work. Mr. Savardi added that they would go through the report and give an overview of the water system as it relates to the mixing with Suez and some of the objectives, results, and discussion, as well as the ongoing monitoring that they are doing.

Mr. Savardi stated that the source of water in Ridgewood is wells, and some of the water comes from Suez which is a mix of surface water and ground water. The Haworth plant is surface water from the Hackensack River, Oradell Reservoir, but also water from the Franklin Lakes system. In addition to the differences, Ridgewood ground water is free chlorine, while the surface water at Haworth is chloramination and the water from Franklin Lakes is free chlorine. Mr. Savardi pointed out that the water will then change depending on how Suez operates the system. He added that Ridgewood Water is getting water ten months out of the year, so that gave them an opportunity for the experiment to not purchase water in October and have the results by 2018. The other piece was the type of corrosion inhibitor, where a phosphate is added to the water; the Suez Water uses zinc orthophosphate, and the wells in Franklin Lakes use a poly/orthophosphate which is similar to Ridgewood Water.

Mr. Savardi stated that they recognized that depending on how Suez is operating the system there could be mixing of different water from these systems. In October 2017, Suez said they were going to go live with the zinc orthophosphate and Mr. Calbi turned off the Ridgewood interconnection with Suez to collect some data. Mr. Savardi stated that the goal was to see if the zinc orthophosphate was going to have a negative impact on lead and copper, discoloration, taste, and odor. He stated that the issue with copper is leakage, which can cause premature failure in the home. They also wanted to see what zinc orthophosphate would do to copper and then to expand the water quality parameters.

Mr. Savardi stated that Abigail had publications in the Water Research Foundation, and she helped develop the monitoring station that is used. The regulations say to look at lead and copper, and chemical scale. He stated that the regulations are very narrow and as a result they chose to open it up so as not to miss anything. Mr. Savardi stated that he believes that biofilm in the pipes is having an impact on some of the lead corrosion as well.

Mr. Savardi displayed a graph showing the regulations; chemical scales and calcium carbonate. He stated that he would display the testing apparatus and the schematic of the test that was done. They designed the test so that the Ridgewood Water staff could perform the experiment, operate the units, do the testing, and send it to the laboratory. They used a Process Research Solutions Monitoring Station which has lead plates and copper plates inside PVC tubing. It ran on Russell Well Water, and then they would get Suez Water and mix it with Ridgewood Water to run though the other tubes. Mr. Savardi stated that once the study was completed, these solutions could be used throughout the system as supplemental monitoring. The goal was to have a comparison with respect to corrosivity under different scenarios. Mr. Savardi stated that the conditions are that Ridgewood Water is only at Russell; condition two at Lenape; and condition three, Ridgewood Water mixed with Suez Water. This testing went on for two and a half months.

Mr. Savardi stated that they were ready to start operating in October 2017, and then in January they began the blending scenarios. The system that they used allowed them to get meaningful results quickly. The four scenarios that they did included Ridgewood groundwater only; Suez groundwater mixed with Suez surface water; Suez surface water only; and 50/50 blend of Ridgewood groundwater and Suez Water. Mr. Savardi stated that it turned out when they did the 50/50 blend that water didn’t have any impact on lead and copper, so it gave them the assurance that they could open up the interconnection. Mr. Savardi stated that Suez felt that the zinc orthophosphate would have some beneficial impacts on some of their cast iron pipes, and it turned out that the zinc wouldn’t mobilize the lead.

Mr. Savardi stated that Ridgewood has a boost chlorination facility that is difficult to operate because some days water is coming in with free chlorine and other days chlorinate. Through this collaborative approach they try to address it with Suez so there is a more consistent supply. Through this discovery the Ridgewood Water wells have some organics and they probably need to be cleaned on a maintenance program. They did some supplemental monitoring after opening the interconnection by selecting some targeted spots throughout the distribution system to test. Mr. Savardi stated that if they see some issues maybe they would revisit the flushing program through more targeted flushing.

Mr. Savardi stated that the next steps include the addition of ammonia to the water by Suez and the possibility of increased microbial activity as a result. They want to monitor for this microbial activity which can lead to increased corrosion and Ridgewood Water has an effective way of testing for it. They also want to look for nitrification as the chlorine residual can decrease through the addition of ammonia by Suez, and Suez can do things to minimize that and provide a high quality supply to Ridgewood. Mr. Savardi stated that they would do the supplemental monitoring beyond the summertime to see the impact of that reactivation of the interconnection. They began the supplemental monitoring because of logistical issues and there is still no adverse impact on the water quality.

Councilman Sedon stated that he gathered from the presentation that Ridgewood Water can continue to purchase water from Suez based on their version of corrosion control. Mr. Calbi stated that Ridgewood can continue to process but it is important that Ridgewood Water continues to monitor. Through discussions with the State, the Department of Environmental Protection issued a letter out to all systems requiring that any time they change treatment they evaluate it and notify the consecutive systems that they are selling it to. If this were to happen again in the future, there would be an entirely new process that would be handled by the State. Mr. Calbi stated that they would continue to monitor using this system that they now have in place.

Councilwoman Knudsen thanked Mr. Calbi regarding his concern and appreciated it as well as the work that he has done.

Councilman Voigt questioned that when another water system changes their treatment of the water, who would pay for the monitoring of it. Mr. Calbi stated that it would be them, and the DEP would require that they perform a study. In this particular case, Suez performed a study but Mr. Calbi didn’t feel that it was intensive enough. Councilman Voigt questioned how much it cost for the study. Mr. Calbi stated that the initial contract was for over $100,000 but they are currently at about 50% of that number. Mott MacDonald purchased the monitoring system, and there was a savings for Ridgewood Water handling the monitoring themselves. Mr. Calbi stated that Ridgewood Water had to pay for the water that wasn’t utilized from Suez when the interconnection was turned off, and they are currently renegotiating that contract. Councilman Voigt asked whether Ridgewood Water could send Suez a bill for the additional testing that was done. Mr. Calbi stated that was part of the negotiations.

Councilman Voigt asked if there was any effect on the water color or taste. Mr. Calbi stated that the intent of the study was the comprehensive approach that Abigail Cantor developed. Mr. Calbi stated that here we are taking the water and evaluating every aspect of it and Suez stated that they walked away from it with a better understanding of their water. Councilman Voigt stated that the issue of biofilms worried him and asked if they were forming now inside the pipes. Mr. Calbi stated that it was an issue of the wells, and they have to be cleaned. There is a lower yield in the wells as a result of the maintenance that hasn’t been done and that is why they are proceeding down the capital plan to clean them and reproduce them back to the quantity of water that they once yielded. The biofilms form in the screens of the wells and become solid and block the water from coming into the wells. There is a routine method of flushing to clear out the possible material that could form that biofilm. Councilman Voigt stated that his concern with biofilms was what was inside them and what potentially can be released over time which could potentially not be good for the water system. Mr. Calbi stated that hydro flushing would be done every Fall leading up to the first winter day when its freezing because it is all done at night to avoid traffic problems.

Mayor Hache asked if there was a plan in place to treat the elevated level of organics in the wells. Mr. Calbi stated that they have consulted with the hydrogeologist to come up with a plan of which wells to attack first, they have already cleaned and reproduced the Carr wells which are scheduled to come online with the new treatment. They are looking at a schedule of twelve wells per year with a full purging of the wells to break down the deposits with chemicals and then do a pump test to verify that they have deep cleaned it. That is part of the route that they are proceeding down with the hopes of eliminating the deposits and getting more yield out of the wells. Mayor Hache stated that the constant monitoring gives peace of mind, but what happens when they detect that the water quality coming in is not the best. How quickly does Suez have to respond to rectify it and is there a way to get compensated until the water is treated properly. Mr. Calbi stated that currently there isn’t, but it is something that they need to discuss in the contract that they are negotiating.

Mayor Hache asked whether that testing was done when the connection with Hawthorne was put in. Mr. Calbi stated that it is a function of technology and that since Hawthorne was similar to Ridgewood there was probably no concern at the time. Now that they are considering a connection with Passaic Valley Water Commission they are doing similar testing beforehand.

Ms. Mailander thanked Mr. Calbi, Mr. Savardi, and the Ridgewood Water employees who did the testing and collected the samples daily. She added that Suez and Ridgewood Water may partner to explain this process on a State or National level and it is very innovative. Mr. Calbi added that it was a lot of weekends and nights.

Councilwoman Walsh recused herself from the presentation.

  1. DISCUSSION
  1. Parking

 

  1. Bond Ordinance – Train Station Parking Lot Reconfiguration

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this is for $330,000 funded by reappropriation of remains of others bond ordinances for the redesign and reconfiguration of the train station parking lot.

                                                                                                       

  1. Operations

 

  1. Zabriskie-Schedler House – Historic Preservation – Grant Acceptance

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Village has heard from the Bergen County Historic Trust Fund that they have received $200,000 for restoration and rehabilitation of the Zabriskie-Schedler House Phase II which includes windows, HVAC, electric, plumbing, basically the inside of the house to make it useable. This is a 50% matching grant to be used for this project. Phase I, which the Village was awarded, was for $116,725. A Phase III grant request has been put in and is pending for $75,000. The Village will probably apply for a Community Development Block Grant for a ramp into the building, and at that point it should be close to finished.

  1. Notice to Proceed – Epic Management

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this resolution would allow Epic Management to proceed with the redevelopment of the Hudson Street parking lot with Tim Haahs, Architect, and Bolo Engineering. This would be prior to the signing of the negotiated agreement with the Village and will allow the Village to move forward so that it doesn’t have to wait possibly another month before the negotiated agreement is approved. The Village and its attorney are reviewing the agreement currently, as well as Epic Management and their attorney, as well. Passing this resolution with a Notice to Proceed, Epic is willing to move forward.

 

  1. Grant Application – Recreational Programming

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Recreation Department has applied for a grant from the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs to provide recreational programming opportunities for individuals with disabilities. This has been done through our grant writing partner, Millennium Strategies. This is for Ridgewood After School Healthy Lifestyles Program and would allow the Recreation Department to coordinate a twice-weekly after-school program for elementary school children in partnership with HealthBarn. The grant amount being requested is $20,000, and if it is received the Village must provide $1 for every $5 of the grant, so the Village would make a contribution in the amount of $4,000. This can be allocated in cash or in-kind contributions to the direct service staff, which are the employees working with the children. Ms. Mailander stated that there is sufficient funding if the Village was awarded the full amount. Tonight a resolution would be considered for the authorization of the grant application and the execution of the cover page at this Special Public Meeting.

Councilwoman Knudsen pointed out that the resolution stated that the Recreation department would coordinate twice-weekly after-school programs for elementary school children in partnership with HealthBarn USA and it didn’t specify special needs school children. Ms. Mailander stated that in the full application it does indicate that it is for abled and disabled, as it is for individuals with disabilities but if they don’t get enough disabled students then it would be filled in with abled students, which is permitted under the grant. It is specifically for individuals with disabilities. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she was concerned that it didn’t actually identify that in the resolution. Ms. Mailander stated that the resolution was received from the State, to abide by the State has required the Village use their resolution. It has to be proven to the State the individuals this program is serving, as well. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she wasn’t comfortable with the language of the resolution, and that she would like to pull it from the consent agenda.

Councilwoman Walsh asked whether the wording could match as disabled individuals and their able-bodied peers. Ms. Mailander stated that the Village has to prove to DCA that the funds were used for that purpose. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that it could be a disproportionate number of disabled individuals and they didn’t know how that would be controlled. She asked whether this is a free program for anyone who enrolls. Ms. Mailander stated that she was unsure but that this grant would be for the cost to provide the program. Councilwoman Knudsen asked how many times this program would run. Ms. Mailander stated that it was a twice-weekly program. Mayor Hache stated that it was for forty weeks, with 20 participants, 12 with disabilities and 8 with none.

Councilman Sedona stated that it would be set up and paid for by the grant but asked if there was a charge for participation. Ms. Mailander stated that usually there is a fee, so she assumed that there would be one but she didn’t know what it was. Councilwoman Knudsen asked who the fee would go to. Ms. Mailander stated that the Parks and Recreation Department and HealthBarn would share the money. There was some discussion on salary. Mayor Hache asked whether the fee would be subject to the same split that programs go through with the HealthBarn. Ms. Mailander stated that she would get that information, however the application was due August 31st which is why it was on a Special Public Meeting for today. Unfortunately, the Village did not know about the grant until the August 8th meeting, meaning that there wasn’t time to discuss it before it needed to be submitted. Ms. Mailander stated that she felt it was a good thing, and was a benefit. DCA was doing this to allow for individuals with disabilities to be able to participate in these types of programming.

Councilwoman Knudsen agreed that it was a good thing, however the resolution did not state specifically special needs. She stated that it did not have to come off the consent agenda as long as she understood where the money was going and asked for further information regarding the fees and the split. Ms. Mailander stated that this was an application and the Village may or may not receive this grant, but it was worth them trying to get this.

 

  1. Budget

 

  1. Social Services Association’s Food Pantry Awareness Campaign – Application to State Historic Preservation Office for Improvements

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Social Services Agency operates from 6 Station Plaza, adjacent to the Ridgewood train station, which is owned by the Village. They have requested that the Village support the Gannet Foundation grant to raise awareness of the need for our community food pantry at the Social Services Association. They want to be able to paint and clean up the trackside walls of the Social Services Association space. There are three windows and a door. The door is not actually used, and they are going to put a placement of professionally designed posters to be displayed on this refurbished area. Ms. Mailander stated that due to the work being done on the Ridgewood train station, and being listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the Village does have to go to SHPO for approval of this project.

  1. Bond Ordinance – Funding for Zabriskie-Schedler House – Phase II

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this was for the house, and the Village had placed $150,000 into the capital budget for improvements to the Schedler park property. So, they need another $50,000 because the Village was fortunate enough to receive $200,000.

 

  1. Cellular Tower Contract at Water Pollution Control Facility

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this resolution was for the cellular tower at the Water Pollution Control Facility on Prospect Street in Glen Rock. The lease has come up, and so this is to authorize the Village Manager to sign the new lease agreement when it is agreed to.

Councilman Sedon made a motion to suspend the Work Session and convene a Special Public Meeting. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING - SEE SEPARATE MINUTES

Mayor Hache called for a motion to adjourn, there was a motion by Councilman Sedon to adjourn the special public meeting and reconvene the Work Session.   Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. DISCUSSION

 

  1. Ridgewood Water

 

  1. Award Contract – Design and Construction Management of Eder, Lakeview and Southside Pump and Well Stations

 

Ms. Mailander stated that there are improvements which are necessary to correct the building, electrical, mechanical site and system deficiencies on these various locations. Proposals were accepted from four prequalified engineering firms. DJ Egarian & Associates, Inc. was the low proposal at $97,000. They are located in Fairfield, New Jersey. The recommendation is to hire DJ Egarian & Associates for this professional engineering services project.

Councilwoman Knudsen questioned why there was such a difference in the cost proposals. Mr. Calbi stated that it was a very big difference, and that the firm of DJ Egarian & Associates is a very small firm compared to the other three firms that submitted proposals. So, as a result they are able to do the job more efficiently and at lower rates as they have lower overhead. They have done several other jobs for Ridgewood Water successfully, so they did not see any issue with that type of service as compared to a larger firm for this work.

Mayor Hache asked whether Ridgewood Water had been happy with the quality of their work. Mr. Calbi responded that they had. Councilman Voigt stated that was a lot of overhead for the other firms submitting proposals. Mr. Calbi added that it was also the approach, as sometimes the firms overthink the project and the other firms that come in lower adhere to what Ridgewood Water outlines for them while some of the bigger firms overengineer it.

  1. Award Contract for Professional Services for Public Communications and Forums

 

Ms. Mailander stated that Ridgewood Water sought the services of a professional public affairs consultant familiar with the water industry. H&G public affairs was phone interviewed. Kelly Henry, who was present on the phone conference, has had experience in the water industry and in developing community outreach and public relations campaigning. Ridgewood Water proposes to schedule individual town specific open house forums this fall. These events will allow the customers in each service community to be educated on the utility and have an informal space to ask questions. Ms. Mailander stated that it would be an open plan, with no set agenda, tables and booths set up, where people can come and go as they please. This would be from approximately 4:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. on four different dates in the four different towns.

Mr. Calbi is recommending that the firm of H&G be appointed as public affairs consultant to Ridgewood Water, on a monthly basis not to exceed $8,500 per month during this public outreach program timeframe. Ms. Mailander stated that in order to meet the fall goals, which is when these public forums will be held, Mr. Calbi is recommending a minimum of a three month engagement be awarded, in the amount not to exceed $25,500. This is coming from the water utility operating budget. After the three month period, they will evaluate the services and determine whether the Council wishes to continue with having this public relations firm assist Ridgewood Water.

 

  1. Award National Powers Alliance Program Contract – Purchase of Hydro-Excavator

Ms. Mailander stated that the National Powers Alliance Program is doing business as Sourcewell, and the actual company is Atlantic Machinery out of Silver Springs, Maryland. The amount of this hydro-excavator is $399,655 and was approved in the 2017 capital budget and discussed in 2018. It was going to be shared with the Streets Department for the cleaning of catch basins. Ms. Mailander stated that a sharing agreement would be drafted with the Village and Ridgewood Water for the utilization of the machine. This machine will be used by the water utility for hydro-excavation, and is a combination of high pressure water and vacuum for the proposed unit.

Ms. Mailander stated that the hydro-excavator allows the utility to dewater trenches quicker and safer, also excavations around multiple utilities underground can be performed without worrying about striking the utilities with the hard end of the mechanical excavator. This machinery will also be used to perform test pits and potholing of service lines and mains, to confirm material and conditions. Ms. Mailander added that the high pressure water jetting and vacuum attachments can also be utilized to perform catch basin and manhole cleaning for the streets division. This has been accounted for in the capital budget.

 

  1. Award National Powers Alliance Program Contract – Purchase of 2019 Ford Escape

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this was a vehicle replacement with National Auto Fleet Group from California. This 2019 Ford Escape will replace an existing vehicle which is fourteen years old and is costing more to maintain than to buy a new one. This will update the equipment fleet to offer better service to Ridgewood Water customers both residential and commercial, while complying with the latest environmental and safety standards.

 

  1. Award State Contract – Purchase of Ruggedized Switches for Fiber Network

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this was a request from the IT Director, Dylan Hansen, for rubberized switches for the SCADA water network. They will replace, upgrade and expand the connectivity of the SCADA network for the Water Department Well and Pump houses located throughout the municipalities. The switches are designed to function in harsh weather and have a low failure rate. The purchase price includes 60 switches, 60 power supplies, and 120 fiber optic connectors. The total amount is $39,775.20 for the SHI National Corporation out of Somerset.

  1. Budget

 

  1. Declare Surplus – International Hook Lift – Street Department

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the International Hook Lift for the Street Department requires more repair than it is worth for the Village. It will go to govdeals.com and be sold online once it is declared surplus.

 

  1. Declare Surplus – Autocar Packer – Street Department

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Autocar Packer for the Street Department requires more repair than it is worth for the Village. It will go to govdeals.com and be sold online once it is declared surplus.

 

  1. Award Contract – Furnish and Deliver Pipe Appurtenances – Water Pollution Control Division

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Water Pollution Control Division awarded the bid items through resolution 18-34. The Water Pollution Control Facility needs to purchase a yard hydrant for the Bellair Pump Station, and they would like to use the previously accepted bid of Water Works Supply Co, of Pompton Plains.

  1. Debt and Financial Management Policies

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Governor’s Finance’s Office Association recommends that all governments engage regularly in long term financial planning. Mr. Rooney stated that he was asking the Council to consider a resolution to formally adopt the Village Debt and Financial Management Policy. He has followed the policies that were laid out in the resolution, but the Village does not have anything in writing that states that this is the format that they take and it is important to have something formalized. He asked that the Council take this into consideration as it deals with debt management, fund balance management, maintenance of debt and financial management policy, and an annual review.

Councilman Voigt asked if Mr. Rooney had this problem when he was getting the AAA rating for Ridgewood. Mr. Rooney stated that two years ago they asked for the Fund Balance Policy, which was adopted, and then he went through GFO best practices and he saw this was something that they should probably adopt.

 

  1. Second Quarter Financial Statements and Report on Bond Sale – August

 

Mr. Rooney stated that the six month financial statements, and starting with the General Fund they were on target with one glitch that he thinks they will overcome to do with Uniform Construction Code fees. After the budget was done, the State came in and changed some of the fees that the Village was able to collect, so there is a slight decline for that, but in speaking to Tom Yotka, he thinks that startup costs for development and things of that nature will match that loss that the Village may have.

Mr. Rooney stated that the other shortfall that they have right now is in the Police Administrative fees, as the Village is pretty low compared to where they were last year, but after talking to Chief Luthcke and looking at subsequent collections he thinks they are okay there.

Mr. Rooney stated that on the appropriations side they are at 50% of the budget and there isn’t anything in there that is earth shattering other than the Planning Board which has exceeded its budget drastically, but they have not allocated the money that they have in the reserve so it won’t be overextended and it’s just a matter of timing.

Mr. Rooney stated that Ridgewood Water has a shortfall in the revenues, which is not unusual based upon the weather that we have had this year, but that is overcome by the reduction in the water that is being purchased.

Mr. Rooney stated that in the Parking Utility, they are slightly down, but are consistent with last year. Based upon the timing of the Parkmobile adjustments, they are back at 50%, and the same with expenditures.

Councilman Voigt questioned the police salary and wages/other expenses and asked why they were pretty close to what they were budgeted for in six months. Mr. Rooney stated that there were a lot of encumbrances that the Village asked them to budget for so the funds have been reserved in blanket order. The blanket orders were put in so that they can keep track of where they are on a monthly basis. Councilman Voigt asked if it had anything to do with overtime, but Mr. Rooney said no.

Councilman Voigt stated that sewer use fees of $147,000 and there was only $6,000 reported, and he asked if that was timing. Mr. Rooney stated that was just timing. Councilman Voigt asked about the administrative charges and vehicle fees for police outside services. Mr. Rooney stated that he had money that came in during August and that was just timing. Councilman Voigt asked about insurance and how they were close to hitting the $666,000 at 71% in six months, and asked if they would go over that. Mr. Rooney stated that it was timing, as well and they would not go over in that. Councilman Voigt asked about the central garage other expenses. Mr. Rooney stated that there was a lot of encumbrances and they have been pushing hard to get the departments to reserve their funds knowing what they are going to be spending.

Mr. Rooney stated that there was a note sale on August 8th, with the notes dated August 16, 2019, and the Village renewed approximately $13 million at $7.5 million in new money with the total sale at approximately $20,200,000. The Village had three firms bid, and all three firms bid a 3% rate and the effective rate from TD Securities was 1.862. Once TD Securities was successful, they exercised their right to have a rating done of the notes and they incur the cost. So, they went to S&P to allow them to evaluate the Village. In the past six to eight years, the Village has not been rated by S&P as it is usually rated by Moody. Mr. Rooney stated that a lot of documentation was provided and they asked if there was a Debt Management Program, and they were impressed with the document that he provided. In their rating, AAA, and also an SP1+ for short term debt.

Their report showed that the Village had a very strong economy, strong management, strong budgetary performance, strong budgetary flexibility, very strong liquidity and a strong institutional framework. The report was glowing, and they commented that the weakness had to do with OPED which is the Village’s ability to fund the pension plans that it gets billed for annually and it is out of the Village’s control as the state is the one that is responsible for the funding of the plans. Mr. Rooney asked if they could provide him with some guidance, and they said that there are many municipalities that put money aside and he hasn’t heard back yet with the list of locations. They are looking for the Village to put money aside so that if the bills come up higher than normal there are funds that the Village can work with. Mayor Hache asked if they provided what would be an appropriate cushion. Mr. Rooney stated that they had not, and did not come back with something that would correct that.

 

  1. Award New Jersey Approved Co-Op Contract – Purchase of Sanitation Truck

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this resolution for the purchase of a sanitation truck was under the Educational Services Commission of New Jersey Cooperative Purchasing from Hudson County Motors of Secaucus and Sanitation Equipment Corporation of Totowa. This was budgeted in the 2018 capital budget and is for the purchase of a 2020 Western Star 4700SB tandem chassis with Leach Model 2R11 25 cy Rearload Refuse Body in the amount of $192,997.

 

  1. Award State Contract – Purchase of Video Teleconferencing Equipment

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this would replace the current unit on the fourth floor of Village Hall. The new system will be mounted in the court room. The TV will be IP based and will allow the system to communicate to vendors, developers, and other municipalities that have video conferencing capabilities. This will also be used by the court for those who are in the jail system so that they can have their hearing. The hardware is a requirement by the court system of New Jersey and will be purchased under state contract from Tele-Measurements, Inc of Clifton for $8,122.40.

 

  1. Declare Surplus – IT Equipment

Ms. Mailander stated that these pieces of equipment are unusable and no longer function. All Hard Drives and memory cards are removed and destroyed separately and then they will work with the recycling center for removal. There is a long list of various pieces of IT equipment which will be declared surplus.

  1. Policy

 

  1. School Resource Officer

 

Ms. Mailander stated that in 2018 the Village Council approved $40,000 for one half of the salary for the school resource officer for September through December of this year. The Board of Education was asked to pay for the remainder of the salary which was $100,000. The Village Council would then budget in 2019 for January through December and they would continue to budget it jointly. Ms. Mailander stated that the Superintendent of Schools let her know that the Board of Education would like to have a School Resource Officer assigned to the Ridgewood Public Schools but they didn’t want to help fund it as it is already being funded by the Village so there is no reason for them to put money towards it. In recalculating the state aid, the Board of Education received over $1 million in additional state aid and gave $500,000 of that towards property tax relief. Ms. Mailander questions why $100,000 for the portion of the SRO couldn’t be funded by the remaining state aid received. The Superintendent of Schools indicated that the other $500,000 may be needed for additional teachers due to a possible increase in enrollment.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that this is a stumbling block for the Village Council as the public is seeking the SRO in the school, and now the Council is back to square one. She stated that she didn’t know the Village Council’s opinion or obligation on this. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that this conversation started with Dr. Fishbein in August 2016 and the discussion was almost raised at every single one of their monthly meetings. This was because the absence of an SRO has been present since December 2015. The Village Council worked hard to get this done with the understand that they would share this cost with the BOE. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that between the Mayor, Village Manager, and Chief of Police, they did cartwheels to get the SRO trained in March or April for this school season which starts today, and they are finding out now that the BOE is not going to assist in funding. The SRO is assigned 100% of the time and the Village loses that police officer off of the Village roster because he is assigned completely to the schools.

Mayor Hache agreed with Councilwoman Knudsen, stating that the discussion began in late summer 2016. In his mind, this is a very important part of community building and particularly in the middle schools. These officers are trained to see two or three steps ahead. In all of the discussions they had, there was always a pushback on the appropriate percentage and they all agreed the school year is 70% of the days in the year, so the BOE would have use of the SRO for that 70% and paying at a 50/50 split he felt was more than generous. Mayor Hache stated there was never a discussion, in any of the meetings, that because the Village Council was already funding it, they should fund it with the BOE not responsible for any portion of the cost. He was shocked that the Council received the notification from Dr. Fishbein that the BOE was backing out after the discussion that took place over two years.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that going back to having the Chief of Police contribute to the conversations, and having an officer trained, they committed to not just one to having at least three trained officers so that there would always be coverage. There was a collective view of the value and importance of this role. She added that the Village Council could start the SRO in the schools in September, give it a timeframe, and go back to the BOE and say that the Council can’t continue to fund it.

Councilman Sedon asked how much was funded. Ms. Mailander stated that half was funded, with just two months covered. Councilman Sedon asked if they could try and stretch it out to cover it until the next budget. He stated that he didn’t know if the BOE wanted to play games with kids’ safety and their lives but he certainly didn’t. So, he would like to have the SRO in the school full time for as long as they possibly can until they can discuss including it in the budget.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she felt that the BOE really needed to step up, and she was surprised to find the whole exercise and all of the work to be taken back in a letter. The Village Council was acting in good faith for the interest of the kids in the district. She stated that she was inclined to say that she didn’t want them to be starting the school year without an SRO but maybe it was something they begin part time, and maybe that was something they could speak to the Chief about. Maybe they could stretch the funds to and accommodate that, as it is community building. It is important as the SRO makes students feel comfortable interacting with police officers. Ms. Mailander stated that she would communicate with the Chief to see if that was something that was possible.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that she didn’t know if they wanted to put the SRO in there and then take it away, as that may be a more confusing message to the public. She asked when the next meeting with the BOE was and suggested that maybe in the next meeting with the Superintendent they should bring it up again. Councilwoman Walsh stated that until they have another discussion, she didn’t recommend putting the SRO in the school. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that they worked so hard on this to get it going, but she was okay with not placing him into the schools until they have the next meeting and can bring this to some conclusion. There was money that came to the BOE and there is funding there.

Councilman Sedon stated that he wanted to see this at least on a part-time basis and then for the Council to take it upon themselves to fund this as the BOE seemed disinterested. Councilwoman Walsh stated that it was their jurisdiction and if they weren’t interested, then why was the Council paying for it. There was some additional discussion, and it was agreed to put it on hold until the meeting next Friday with the Superintendent to hopefully bring it to some conclusion.

  1. Donation to Parks and Recreation Department – Conservancy of Ridgewood Public Lands – Children’s Sensory Butterfly Garden

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Children’s Sensory Butterfly Garden was a project two years in the planning and it was dedicated in June or July. This is a place where children can discover nature, hone their sense, create, learn and play. The Council requires a resolution to accept this donation.

 

  1. Zoning – Prohibit Sale of Marijuana

 

Ms. Mailander stated that there is an email on this topic from Sheila Brogan, who is on the Municipal Alliance Committee, which approved a resolution opposed to the sale of marijuana and sent this to the Governor’s Council on Alcohol and Drug Addition (GCADA). In May, Glen Sherman, a Ridgewood parent and member of the Municipal Alliance Committee, and Ms. Brogan attended the legislative hearing on legalizing recreational marijuana held at Bergen Community College. She testified on behalf of the Municipal Alliance Committee and voiced concerns about how legalization would undercut the work funded through the GCADA grant with Village students about addiction and drug use. Ms. Brogan wrote in her email that among the twenty or so people testifying, there were only two who spoke against legalization.

Ms. Mailander stated that included with this email were sample ordinances or resolutions from various municipalities including Wyckoff and Waldwick, which have changed their zoning to prohibit the sale of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia in those towns. This will be discussed under the smoking ordinance where they have tried to incorporate cannabis sellers along with e-cigarettes. Ms. Mailander stated that it hasn’t been approved by the State Legislature but it is moving towards that. They have information from the Code Official that it is a recommendation to pass an ordinance prior because you may have some pressure to allow it if you wait.

Mr. Rogers stated that some of the Council received an ordinance that dealt with smoking tobacco, electronic vapor substance inhalation devices and materials, and cannabis. Right now, cannabis is illegal so there is really no harm in putting in the ordinances that they do not want any cannabis related devices, materials, shops, or retails existing in the Village. There are other issues that deal with tobacco sales and electronic vaping inhalation devices, but they are just talking about cannabis right now. Mr. Rogers stated that it may be that if the state decides to legalize marijuana there may be a rush to deal with whether or not a community may be willing to accept a retail store or a dispensary. If it is a legalized use permitted by the state, you can’t zone it out of your district or town. He added that one of the things they have to look at is where, if there is anything from the perspective of vapor devices and tobacco shops, if it was going to be allowed in the town, and some of the criteria that would be set forth in the ordinance to determine where it could be located.

Mr. Rogers stated that a lot of towns are taking it from the standpoint of conditional use. He stated that from a planning and legal perspective, all of those things need to be discussed. They had a meeting set up Monday afternoon to discuss it in a small group, but those were the considerations they have to look at as they approach cannabis and tobacco shops and electronic vapor devices, as well. Brigette Bogart, Village Planner, stated that she reviewed the draft ordinance and that she appreciated the regulations. The question becomes, where do they want to permit it and how are the regulations going to address those certain areas. Do they want to set up conditional use and in certain zones, which are major conditions that they have to discuss before coming up with an ordinance. Mr. Rogers added that this would be run through the Planning Board as it gets developed, and that he wanted to get an idea of what the Council and the Planner think about it.

Councilman Sedon stated that he thinks Ocean City, New Jersey is a dry town, and he asked how they do that and would the same kind of mechanism be applicable here. Mr. Rogers stated that was the same kind of situation that they would discuss and there was a very good chance that those types of regulations came about when it wasn’t legal, and the same thing may apply here. By putting it in an ordinance that they are about to adopt, that it is not allowed in any of the Village districts, they are protecting themselves. Mr. Rogers added that there are constitutional issues if it gathers as much support as is indicated in some of the statewide forums, it may gather some support for the purposes of asserting constitutional issues the same way. Councilman Sedon stated that there are some big companies out there that deal in marijuana so they have the resources to push the issues and open up shop in Ridgewood, and he was worried they could legally force that. Mr. Rogers stated that if the Council properly approaches it and determines from the standpoint of the tobacco and electronic inhalation devices as to where those kind of uses may be permitted. They could try to set up the kind of parameters that they think are important from a safety and health standpoint.

Mayor Hache stated that from a zoning standpoint, whether it is inclusionary or exclusionary they could say they do not want sexually oriented retail in town which is perfectly legal and you cannot control consumption of it. In terms of zoning, where they allow individuals to sell in the community could they do it with that. Mr. Rogers stated that you cannot do it with that, as there are a number of cases that came out in the 1990s that deal with the inability of a town to completely restrict those uses in the community, you have to zone for it somehow. Mayor Hache asked from a B1/B2 standpoint, if they don’t want it in the Central Business District, are the locations for that. Ms. Bogart stated that was the key, as they need to talk through the goals and figure out the criteria that is necessary. Mr. Rogers stated that you can set up so many conditions that you basically make it impossible for anything like that to exist, and that has been found to be unconstitutional.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the fact that it is illegal right now and therefore they are silent in any of the ordinances from prohibiting that because it is illegal, could it be considered grandfathered in. Mr. Rogers stated that was what they were going to be proposing, to adopt an ordinance to make it illegal to sell any cannabis products in the Village. Councilman Sedon stated that this went with his prohibition question. Mr. Rogers stated that many towns have already started saying that it is illegal. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that it was interesting, because according to Sheila Brogan’s letter, twenty spoke positive and two were against, but all of those individuals were attempting to support the business end of it.

Councilman Sedon asked if anyone knew how close the state was to doing something so they don’t miss the boat. Mr. Rogers stated that he thinks it is still being discussed, but he thinks there is going to be a finite end at the end of the year. Typically with regulations or legislation such as this, it may kick in on a particular day to give people the time to get it set up, but at the same time allow towns to react and see what they may want to do. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that from the state observation noting that so many municipalities are saying no, that might be a message that they are receiving. Mr. Rogers stated that was a good observation.

Ms. Mailander stated that at the meeting on Monday, they would discuss it and then on September 26th it would come before the entire Council with a proposal for cannabis, electronic smoking devices, and licensing of the retailers of the electronic smoking devices. If everyone is in favor of what is proposed then they can move forward in October to introduce and adopt in November.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked if they could address the email from Sheila Brogan. Ms. Brogan sent the Municipal Alliance resolution opposing the legalization of marijuana which goes to the Governor, and the request is that that Village Council adopts this resolution and forwards it to Governor Murphy. Ms. Brogan stated that the resolution was from the Municipal Alliance, and was sent to GCADA and the Municipal Alliance in Bergen County which are the two groups that oversee the Municipal Alliance work. They have talked to their representative in District 40, but otherwise she sent it to Ms. Mailander when she understood that the Council would be discussing the sale of recreational marijuana and whether it would be allowed in Ridgewood, knowing that other communities have passed resolutions in some form to restrict that sale. Ms. Brogan stated that this resolution was provided informationally, and if the Council would like to do something with it that would be fine. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she thought they would change some of the wording and forward it on. Ms. Brogan stated that she thought it would be helpful. Her understanding right now is that Senate President Sweeney feels that by the end of the month he will bring forward legislation. There is no guarantee it will pass, but it does seem to be moving at a faster pace that she anticipated. The Governor’s Budget indicated revenues of $60 million in year one and $300 million year two and beyond, so they are looking at revenue sources now.

Ms. Mailander asked whether the Council was all in favor of passing a resolution to not legalize recreational marijuana. Mayor Hache stated that he felt they should discuss it at the meeting on Monday and then bring it back before the Council.

  1. Liquor License Transfer – Granova to Patpar, Inc.

 

Ms. Mailander stated that Granova, Inc. trading as Cordially Yours is being transferred to Patpar, Inc. trading as Cordially Yours Liquors. The Police Department has done their investigation, they have paid all fees and completed all applications.

 

  1. Residency Ordinance – Civilian Titles

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this is going back to what the Village had for decades prior to changing it to just for Police and Fire which is required under Civil Service anyway. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that as in 2014 and 2015 this change is specific to civilian titles only. Ms. Mailander stated that it could be keyboarding clerk, laborer, and even higher titles than that; anything that is administrative or a blue collar title. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that this excludes any public safety, police, fire, and the civilian titles would be the residency preference which brings jobs back to Ridgewood residents that are qualified for the position and as required by Civil Service guidelines. There was agreement among the Council to bring the jobs back to residents.

Councilwoman Walsh asked if veterans get preference. Ms. Mailander stated that it would be veterans who are residents, then residents, then veterans who are residents of Bergen County, and that was how Civil Service works. Disabled veterans then get preference over veterans; it is the same as it is now. Ms. Mailander stated that this is for required residency for all titles and that means that all other things being equal the job would go to a Ridgewood resident. There was additional discussion on the preference, and Ms. Mailander stated that it makes sense to do contiguous counties if there wasn’t anyone in Ridgewood or Bergen County because they would know Ridgewood and what kind of town it is. She added that sometimes for competitive titles, they get applications from halfway down the state.

 

  1. CBD Display – Discuss Trial Period & Fee

 

Ms. Mailander stated that they would consider, for adoption, the ordinance for outdoor displays in the Central Business District. They have discussed having a nine month trial period with a $75 fee. If the Council is in agreement, this has to be adopted by a resolution, for September 12, and then it would be effective October 2 through June 30, 2019. During that timeframe, the Council would get feedback from the Code Enforcement Officer and the Building Department who are issuing the permits to see if there are some changes to make and consider if this should be made permanent.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that this has been an issue in the past with retailers that have received summonses. Should they put together an information packet for Chamber and CBD to get the word out to retailers and businesses. Ms. Mailander stated that the Building Department and Code Enforcement Officer will have the ordinance that they can give to people with information, and then it can be given to the Chamber and Guild as well as provided to anyone who asks for it. Mayor Hache stated that Harry would take the information to all of the retailers.

 

  1. Smoking Ordinance

 

Encompassed in Zoning – Prohibit the Sale of Marijuana.

 

  1. Zoning in B1/B2 Districts

 

Mayor Hache stated the zoning in B1/B2 was something that they began discussing several months ago, regarding the zoning in the Central Business District. The zoning we have today is very restrictive as right now there are a number of vacancies in the downtown. Some have potential tenants but because of the zoning, they are not allowed because they are not permitted under the list of things that are allowed in that zone. Mayor Hache stated that to have more flexibility but to be able to regulate what happens, they wanted to discuss what to bring before the Planning Board.

Ms. Bogart stated that the zoning ordinance is very restrictive, and a number of potential retailers have been roadblocked by the zoning ordinance. To modify the ordinance to make the Village more business friendly, she looked at a comparison of the B1 and B2 districts. B2 permits a number of different uses on the first floor, which are not permitted in the B1 district. A number of the retailers looking to come in were instructional uses or were not identified in the list of potential retail sales. Her suggestion was that they modify the B1 uses that are permitted. In the B1, the retail sales list is very outdated and includes haberdasheries, record shops, and other such uses that really don’t exist now. It doesn’t include uses that are typical in today’s standard like child instructional facilities, technology sales, recreational uses, cosmetic shops, bath and body shops, and businesses of that nature.

Ms. Bogart stated that looking at the comparison, her suggestion is that they modify the current uses in the B1 and B2 and take out the outdated uses and focus on current standards. She asked if they wanted to look at creating an exclusionary ordinance, and her concern from that perspective was that she wasn’t sure if that was completely legal. Also, she would be concerned that they would forget about one of the uses that they wanted to exclude and someone may come in and want to open that type of business. Ms. Bogart stated that she suggested that they went through the B1/B2 lists, update it to current retail standards and modify the current retail permitted uses. She asked if the Village Council wanted to permit instructional uses and other types of office uses in the first floor of the B1 because they currently aren’t permitted there. She stated that she didn’t think it was a bad thing from a planning perspective because that provided more activity on the street level as opposed to a restaurant during the day.

Mayor Hache stated that they also discussed what drives foot traffic in the downtown. Retailers have adapted and what is driving these days is more experiential retail and the code is not adapting to the reality of the 21st century. He stated that as a good first step, they should modernize that list because they are allowed to have TV repair shops, but not cell phone sales. The idea behind updating the uses was to find out what would drive foot traffic. Ms. Bogart added that she liked the term experiential retail as people liked that type of retail, and was a good term that would be appropriate for the ordinance modification.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she knows this came up long ago because of the dance studio, which opened this discussion. She agrees that they have to update the list and be more open, as the current code doesn’t allow game stores which are a big driver of foot traffic. She added that they also need to be consistent with the Master Plan because that dictates that it has to be retail where there are sales of retail product to generate that foot traffic and interest. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the balance that they need to strike is how do they accomplish saying that there can be a dance or karate studio and not turn the entire street into spin cycle and karate because that would change the entire nature of the downtown. She asked if it was time to add different zones so that they don’t create an environment that is strictly service or exercise.

Mr. Rogers stated that the updating of the uses permitted in the B1 and B2 is certainly warranted. They worry as number of years ago, all of a sudden there were a large number of banks and salons entering the CBD. By competition, things work their way into that as people do their research and they determine which place they are going to go to. Breaking it down further into separate zones can be looked at but it is tough to decide where that line ends for one and begins for another. He thinks that for the first instance, the updating is an important aspect of that.

Councilman Voigt asked if they were silent on something does that mean that it can be included or is it discluded. Mr. Rogers stated that anything that isn’t listed in that zone is considered not a permitted use, and that they aren’t necessarily going to include everything but they use specific uses but also generally so that they can include something where it was meant to be. You run the risk by excluding things, so you have to take the time to compare it to the Master Plan and decide how you are going to update the zones and how you are going to approach it.

Councilman Sedon stated that they say a few years ago that there were six or seven frozen yogurt shops all at once, and now most of those have gone away and that is how the market works. Mayor Hache added that the Village doesn’t have butcher shops, which are allowed, and if they don’t update this Ridgewood is going to be a 100% restaurant town. Ms. Bogart added that you need the daytime foot traffic. Councilwoman Knudsen asked what type of businesses approached and were turned away and chose not to pursue through variance relief or the Board of Adjustments. She asked what types of businesses were deterred from coming into Ridgewood because of the zoning process. Ms. Bogart stated that within the past year there were two instructional studios, two cryogenics spas, a hair salon with facial massages, and a cooking studio for children.

Mayor Hache stated that a trend in a lot of towns that have been adapting such as Pinot’s Palate are things that drive a lot of foot traffic and bring people into the downtown. Ms. Bogart added karate and tae kwon do. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that it was interesting to understand the nature of the businesses. Ms. Bogart stated that the ordinances are interpreted word for word, so if it isn’t there it isn’t permitted. Mayor Hache asked from a planning perspective how would they get a list of modern day businesses that they can consider. Ms. Bogart stated that she would put together a list, such as what is in the malls in Paramus, and then the Council can determine what they want to permit and where and then an ordinance can be written.

Councilman Sedon asked that since they were engaging in a Master Plan process, they wouldn’t write anything new for the old Master Plan. Ms. Bogart stated that she wouldn’t do double-duty and modify the Master Plan twice. The only issue was that if they were creating a land use ordinance that was not consistent with the Master Plan. Mr. Rogers stated that if it is not consistent with the Master Plan then they would have to adopt by resolution the reasons why it wasn’t consistent. He added that they would work them together to make sure that they don’t contradict each other, and take into consideration what you intend to do in one and vice-versa.

Ms. Mailander asked whether the Village Council wanted Ms. Bogart to come back to the Council or to start with the Planning Board. Mayor Hache stated that he would like her to start here. Ms. Mailander stated that for either the September 26th or October 3rd Work Session they would bring back this ordinance. Councilwoman Knudsen asked whether Ms. Bogart wanted the Council to work on a list of uses they would like to see. Ms. Bogart stated that was a great idea.

  1. Operation

 

  1. Grove Park Area Cleanup Program – Ridgewood Wildscape Assoc. and Partners

Ms. Mailander stated that the Ridgewood Wildscape Association are going to be cleaning the Grove Park area on Sunday, October 14th between 1:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. This is the twelfth year that Ridgewood Wildscape has organized such a cleanup and it is great community involvement. This program assists with the Village’s stormwater protection program, and is an important component of the NJDEP stormwater permit. The Village provides chest waders, gloves, some rakes and hand tools, and they pick up and dispose the accumulated debris. Anyone who would like to volunteer is welcome.

  1. REVIEW OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this was a review of the September 12, 2018 Public Meeting Agenda.

Proclamations include: Fire Prevention Week; Gold Star Mother’s Day; National Breast Cancer Awareness Week; and Walktoberfest.

Resolution of Appointment and Swearing-in of Municipal Human Law Enforcement Officer.

Resolution for Ridgewood Water: Award Contract – Design and Construction of Eder, Lakeview and Southside Pump and Well Stations; Award Professional Services Contract – Public Communications; Award Contract under National Powers Alliance Program – Purchase of Hydro-Excavator; Award Contract under National Powers Alliance Program – 2019 Ford Escape; and Award Contract under State Contract – Ruggedized Switches for Fiber Network.

The following ordinances are scheduled for introduction: 3762 – Amend Chapter 3, Administration of Government – Article VIII – Residency Requirements; 3673 – Amend Chapter 190 Land Use and Development – Zoning in B1/B2 Zone Districts; and 3674 – Amend Smoking Ordinance and Establish Licensing of Sellers of Electronic Smoking Devices.

Ordinances for Public Hearing include: 3663 – Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Parking on Overbrook Road; 3664 – Amend Bond Ordinance – Reappropriation of Funding for Stretchers for EMS; 3665 – Bond Ordinance – One Hook Lift Body with Accessories – Parks Department (NTE $58,000); 3666 – Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Bus Stops; 3667 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Allow Displays in Central Business District; 3668 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Permitted Encroachment of Stairs into Rear Yard; and 3669 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Front Yard Setback in the B-1 and B-2 Zone Districts.

Resolutions include: Award Contract – Furnish and Deliver Pipe and Appurtenances – Water Pollution Control Facility; Award Contract – Purchase of Sanitation Truck; Award Contract Under State Contract – Purchase of Video Teleconferencing Equipment; Declare Property Surplus – International Hook Lift – Street Department; Declare Property Surplus – Autocar Packer – Street Department; Declare Property Surplus – IT Equipment; Accept Donation from Conservancy for Ridgewood Public Lands – Children’s Sensory Butterfly Garden; Approve Liquor License Transfer – Granova, Inc., t/a Cordially Yours to Patpar, Inc., t/a Cordially Yours Liquors; and Authorize Cleaning of Grove Park Area by the Ridgewood Wildscape Association.

  1. MANAGERS REPORT

9/11 Portraits of our “Friends and Neighbors” – Ms. Mailander stated that the 9/11 Portraits of our “Friends and Neighbors” is displayed in the auditorium of the Ridgewood Library. This is tribute to the twelve Ridgewood residents that we lost on September 11th.

Parking Reminders – Ms. Mailander stated that all parking rates ate seventy-five cents an hour. Enforcement is Monday through Friday from 9:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. and Saturday from 10:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Meter duration is three hours, except for the main Cottage Place lot which is eleven hours. The Cottage Place Annex lot is a three hour spot. Employee parking requires a CBD parking permit, they are located in the Walnut Street and Cottage Place lot. CBD employee permits and hangtags can be purchased at the reception desk in Village Hall. She reminded everyone of the kiosks in Cottage Place parking lot, Cottage Place Annex, and both sides of North Broad Street. The parking kiosks accept coins, dollar bills, and credit cards. It requires you to put the license plate number into the kiosk. Parkmobile is also available. On North Broad and Cottage Place, there are arrows directing people to the kiosks. September 25th is the date for the new meter times for the train station parking lot, Monday through Friday 6:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. and Saturday from 10:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.

 

“Music Fest” – Ms. Mailander stated that the Ridgewood Guild is presenting “Music Fest” on Sunday, September 9th from 1:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. in Memorial Park at Van Neste Square. There will be bands performing, a beer garden, and local restaurants will have food for sale.

Chamber of Commerce Car Show – Ms. Mailander stated that 25th annual car show with 400 plus classic vehicles. It is known as the best nighttime car show in our area. The cars will be displayed around Memorial Park at Van Neste Square and down East Ridgewood Avenue, this Friday, September 7th, from 6:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. There is no rain date.

Flood Hazard – Due to the work by Jovan Mehandzic in the Engineering Department, properties in the Village’s flood hazard areas will now qualify for a discount of 20% instead of 15% on their flood insurance premiums. This is a change of a cross 7 to a cross 6 rating. A resolution will be prepared for the September 12th public meeting to accept the new rating.

Govdeals.com – Ms. Mailander stated that the Village has sold four vehicles in the past two weeks on govdeals.com which were previously declared surplus. The Village realized $17,000 from the sales, and is being worked on by Janet Fricke, Assistant to the Village Manager, and Anthony DeLaRosa from Fleet Services.

Events held later in September – Ms. Mailander stated that the Ridgewood Arts and Crafts Street Fair is on September 16th. Good Life Ridgewood on September 30th, and Gold Star Mother’s Day on the evening of September 30th.

Ms. Mailander added that she wanted to thank the Village employees in the Traffic and Signal Division as they had to remove the meter heads and install the kiosks, put up signage, create the signs, and are now in the process of putting stickers on the poles where the meter heads no longer exist. They have also reprogramed the meters for seventy-five cents an hour, and 341 meters were reprogrammed over two days. Large kiosks signs were installed in the Cottage Place lot. She added that the employees are amazing in what they are able to accomplish in a short period of time. Everything should be up and running and properly signed by the end of the week.

Mayor Hache asked about Coffee with the Council. Ms. Mailander stated that this was on Saturday from 10:00 A.M. to noon for new residents to Ridgewood. It is an open house where they can come in and meet with the Council on an informal basis.

  1. COUNCIL REPORTS

 

Graydon PoolCouncilman Sedon stated that he wanted to note that the swim season at Graydon was excellent and he thinks that the water quality was getting better as the season went on. He added that he wanted to thank everyone involved in that.

Chamber of Commerce Car ShowCouncilwoman Walsh reiterated that the Car Show was this Friday evening and she encouraged everyone to attend.

Citizen Safety Advisory Committee – Councilman Voigt stated that they met on August 16th. The Village Engineer, along with the Police Department to examine the effect of adding a middle turning left land for two way traffic on Franklin Avenue to see if that has a calming effect in the traffic in that area. An analysis was done of North Walnut Street between Linwood and Franklin as there are a number of signs saying 25 MPH. Sergeant Chuck looked at the street over a couple days and found that the average was 30 MPH going north and 32 MPH going south. Councilman Voigt added that less than 1% exceeded 40 MPH. There was a review of looking at a double yellow centerline, but that didn’t seem to have broad support with the residents on North Walnut and he encouraged the residents who were concerned to notify himself or the residents of the CSAC committee.

Councilman Voigt added that they spoke about the modifications to the parking lot at the train station. There were hardly any concerns. Age Friendly Ridgewood was concerned about the importance of maintaining pedestrian walking access during the day. CSAC would also appreciate input to the Master Plan as it is being reviewed.

YMCA Transformation Cocktail – Mayor Hache stated that he attended the event yesterday, as the YMCA is now the 100% owner of the building in Ridgewood. It was a great event where they revealed the new sign. This is about the need to upgrade the facility as the layout is not very efficient, so there will be a capital campaign and a focus on providing innovative programming for children, families, and active older adults.

New Restaurant – Mayor Hache added that he was able to tour the new restaurant going into the old Fish location. It was an amazing tour and he was very impressed. What was the old bank building is now going to be a catering venue with a bridal suite for events. In the back where it used to be a boardroom is going to be a rooftop bar. They will commission an artist to do some tasteful murals on the side of the building.

Lyft – Mayor Hache stated that he was having some conversations with Lyft, as the Council had been talking with Uber about an innovative partnership to bring commuters to the train station. They didn’t get far with Uber and it fell apart, but Lyft has picked up in that area. He stated that he approached them to see how wiling they were to form partnerships with businesses, particularly restaurants in the downtown. Mayor Hache felt that if businesses were willing to spend $50,000 for valet parking, they might be willing to subsidize a Lyft ride to the restaurant and back. He stated that a larger restaurant is parking less cars but having more customers, so many people are taking Lyft to the restaurants already. Mayor Hache stated that there would be a follow-up conversation with Lyft, and it was an innovative way to alleviate some of the traffic problems in the downtown.

 

  1. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Pamela Perron, 123 Kenilworth Road, thanked the Council for the clarification on the proposed parking lot expansion at the train station, but added that if the Village was not requiring people to back in then they were not getting the safety benefit of pulling out forward. She added that she wondered if a formal traffic safety study was warranted here. Ms. Perron stated that regarding the trees they marked on the plan, it did not indicate which trees are being cut down and where. She asked which trees were being taken down and replaced.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that it was interesting that the Mayor mentioned the Y, as he spoke with the Executive Director who discussed the renovation program and indicated that they will be trying to raise between $10 million to $12 million to perform this. He noted during the conversation that they are going to completely renovate the facility and are not going to close all. Mr. Loving stated that he wanted the Council to keep this in mind when they have the discussion on September 26th. He added that with respect to Councilman’s Sedon comments, Graydon was wonderful this year. However, he wanted to discuss the Graydon ad-hoc committee that was formed in 2017. He was disappointed that the bathrooms had not been renovated, and he hoped that the Council would allocate funds in the budget for 2019.

Mr. Loving added that he spoke about the notification process regarding the pool being closed or opened, requesting that there be some sort of electronic method for next year. He added that he understands since the Council is the approving authority for the snack bar vendor, and sometimes they close early. The contract indicates that they are supposed to remain open to the posted time, and there were may times that it closed between 6:15 P.M. and 6:30 P.M.

Mr. Loving spoke about the deep water test, adding that he understood why it existed. However, he has seen six and seven year old’s passing the test and you have to take the test until you are eighteen years old. It doesn’t seem to make sense to him that if you pass the test a number of years in a row consecutively, why you would have to take the test for so many more years. There is a computer record, and could it be set up that if you passed three years in a row they would automatically get the badge.

Mr. Loving stated that on July 18th the Village Council voted to change the date of the election for the school board and on August 29th received a memo from the superintendent indicating that they are not going to pay for the SRO. He stated that he felt there was a connection.

Saurabh Dani, 390 Bedford Road, stated that regarding the SRO and the letter that the school board received a million dollars in extra funding from the state and gave the Village $500,000. He felt that the school board should have given the whole million dollars because that money came right after the budget was planned and there were no new expenses. Mr. Dani stated that the school board said there would be a 17% increase in the healthcare costs and that was the reason why they went over the 2% cap, and the healthcare increase only came out to be 6%. He felt that the 11% extra that they increased this year was perpetual as they are never going to reduce the tax levy again, so they are going to keep charging residents every year. Mr. Dani stated that they were getting the $500,000 extra from the healthcare expense, as well as the $500,000 from the state, meaning they have a million dollars more than planned. Mr. Dani stated that he didn’t see fourth quarter taxes that showed the issuance from the school board, but he didn’t see that reflected yet.

Regarding the train station parking lot reconfiguration, when the Village Council was making a decision, he stated that they asked how much it would cost. However, he was surprised that they accepted that the amount changed 40% in a month. Mr. Dani added that he requested the Village Council to formalize the deal with HealthBarn for use of extra land for their teaching garden. He had two different answers regarding how much land they are using and who approved it. The approval of the community garden location is all oral, and he stated there is no paperwork between the Village and HealthBarn. He stated this includes that the tree plots plus any extra land that that are using around the community garden, as there is a lot of stuff beyond the fenced area and it should all be formalized.

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that regarding Parkmobile she was shocked that the Village hasn’t gotten a refund of the transaction fees. The date under which those fees stopped being in question needs to be resolved. The original resolution for Parkmobile called for no transaction fees. Ms. Loving stated that regarding the grant for the Habernickel Park, she thought that the people in that neighborhood have been treated unfairly. It looks to her that a grant writer has secured a $20,000 grant which was filed without the Village Council’s knowledge and now an additional $4,000 of taxpayer money is also going to go towards that. The Parks and Recreation employees are going to be working for HealthBarn the way she reads it and it looks like HealthBarn benefits from this which she doesn’t think is keeping with the ongoing complaints that are coming from that neighborhood. Eighty additional session at HealthBarn as a result of this new program and she didn’t know how the Village Council rationalized that with all of the complaints that have come through from the Habernickel neighborhood.

Ms. Mailander stated that the program would be held at The Stable with HealthBarn participating.

Mayor Hache stated that Parkmobile did issue a check, but what is in question is whether it was appropriate as it was crediting back to June 1 or should it have been earlier.

 

 

 

  1. RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

 

Deputy Village Clerk, Donna Jackson read Resolution #18-241 to go into Closed Session as follows:

  1. ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Walsh, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Work Session was adjourned at 11:21 P.M.

______________________________

                                                                                                   Ramon M. Hache, Sr.                             

                                                                                                                        Mayor                           

______________________________

              Donna M. Jackson

           Deputy Village Clerk

  • Hits: 2375

A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOD, NEW JERSEY ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2018 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

  1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL

Mayor Hache called the meeting to order at 9:14 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call the following were present: Councilwoman Knudsen, Councilman Sedon, Councilman Voigt, Councilwoman Walsh, and Mayor Hache. Also present were Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; and Donna Jackson, Deputy Village Clerk.

  1. ORDINANCES
  1. INTRODUCTION - Ordinance #3670 – Bond Ordinance – Reconfiguration of Train Station Parking Lot ($330,000)

 

Mayor Hache moved the first reading of ordinance 3670. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3670 by title:

BOND ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, NEW JERSEY, AMENDING SECTION 3(a) OF BOND ORDINANCE #3595 AND SECTION 3(a) OF BOND ORDINANCE #3394 IN ORDER TO REAPPROPRIATE FROM SUCH BOND ORDINANCES THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF $330,000 TO PROVIDE FOR THE REDESIGN-RECONFIGURATION OF THE TRAIN STATION PARKING LOT AND AMENDING SECTION 6(b) OF BOND ORDINANCE #3595 TO AMEND THE USEFUL LIFE.

Councilwoman Knudsen moved that ordinance 3670 be adopted on first reading and that September 26, 2018 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            Councilman Voigt

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

  1. INTRODUCTION - Ordinance #3671 – Bond Ordinance – Additional Funding for Restoration of Zabriskie-Schedler House, Phase 2

 

Mayor Hache moved the first reading of ordinance 3671. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3671 by title:

BOND ORDINANCE PROVIDING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF $50,000 FOR PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS TO SCHEDLER BUILDING IN AND BY THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, NEW JERSEY, AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $47,500 BONDS OR NOTES OF THE VILLAGE TO FINANCE PART OF THE COST THEREOF.

Councilwoman Knudsen moved that ordinance 3671 be adopted on first reading and that September 26, 2018 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            Councilman Voigt

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

Before casting his vote, Councilman Voigt stated that until the Village Council knows what the Village plans to do with the building and how it is going to be paid for he was not in favor of this ordinance.

  1. PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance #3662 – Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Parking Meter Times and Train Station and Regulate Multi-Space Parking Meter Use

 

Mayor Hache moved the Clerk read ordinance 3662 by title on second reading and that the public hearing thereon be opened. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3662 by title:

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-29, “PARKING METER ZONE DESIGNATED.”

Mayor Hache announced that the Public Hearing was open.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, asked if this meant that if you were parking at the train station and do not have a hang tag and you are expected to arrive on a train that would arrive in Ridgewood post-6:00 P.M. you would now be required to pay for any time past 6:00 P.M. Ms. Mailander stated that was correct. Mr. Loving asked whether the parking lots on Route 17 followed the same time schedule. Ms. Mailander stated that both lots had the same time schedule. Mr. Loving stated that he was not a commuter, nor has he been one from the Ridgewood train station, but he felt that this placed an unnecessary burden on those commuters who were leaving at 6:00 A.M., instead of paying for twelve hours of parking, they now have to pay for two additional hours if they don’t have a hang-tag. He felt that it was really scraping the bottom of the barrel to make them pay for fourteen hours of parking instead of twelve hours of parking.

Mr. Loving stated that he suspected that the Village Council may be doing this because some people who are using the restaurants on Broad Street may be deciding to park at the train station, but he believes that there is an ordinance in place that indicates that in order to park at the train station you are required to have a commuter sticker. He asked if between 6:00 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. you needed to have a commuter sticker, or was that restriction ending at 6:00 P.M. Mr. Loving stated that there was no language in the ordinance that indicates what the story is with respect to the commuter stickers. His major objection is that this places a heavy burden on commuters that they are going to have to now pay for fourteen hours instead of twelve hours of parking without using a hangtag. Mr. Loving asked Mr. Rooney if there were and figures on how many people are parking in the lost that are either putting quarters in meters or using Parkmobile as opposed to using the hangtags. Ms. Mailander stated that her understanding is the majority are hangtags, but not everyone. Mr. Loving inquired about the requirement for the commuter sticker. Ms. Mailander stated that she didn’t know off-hand, but she would look it up.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the change to 8:00 P.M. is a requirement to make sure that you capture that revenue stream for those that go in to park, but she would think that after a certain time, anybody should be allowed to park in the train station lot after 6:00 P.M. if those spaces have been vacated. She stated that they had to look at the language and see how to make certain that the change would allow anyone coming into the vacated space to park there. Mr. Loving stated that he agreed that if the spaces are vacated then they should be able to capture that revenue stream, and if the language of the sticker says during normal operating hours then they can’t do that. Ms. Mailander stated that the ordinance could be amended to allow for the parking after 6:00 P.M. if that was something that the Village Council wanted to do. Mr. Loving reiterated that he felt that it was a burden on the commuters. Ms. Mailander stated that it was to be consistent with all of the other lots.

Saurabh Dani, 390 Bedford Road, stated that he noticed on the Village website that hours are changing on parking and that on Cottage Street there will be eleven hour meters. So, if a commuter parks at Cottage Street and is going to work at 6:00 A.M. and feeds the meter for eleven hours, they won’t be back before 8:00 P.M. Ms. Mailander stated that it was 9:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. Mayor Hache stated that the train station meters have always started earlier. Mr. Dani stated that if someone is feeding the meter at 7:00 A.M. then it is for eleven hours. Mayor Hache stated that problem exists with Cottage and some employees that arrive at work before 10:00 A.M. and that was something that had to be addressed with Parkmobile because when they were feeding the meter for the maximum time, it started when they got there. For example, starting at 9:00 A.M. and expired before the last hour. Councilman Sedon stated that the same situation existed at the train station if someone had to leave earlier than 6:00 A.M., they would have to feed the meter for that additional time. He stated that with Parkmobile, if you parked at 8:00 A.M. and start working and then pay for Parkmobile from 9:00 A.M., so you can pay for the meter from anywhere, then it starts. Mayor Hache stated that Parkmobile was a better option because it recognized when the meters were active as opposed to paying before that time.

Mayor Hache moved that the public hearing was closed. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

Councilman Sedon moved that ordinance 3662 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

Councilman Voigt stated while voting that he felt that they should look at the hangtags because it seems like the people who buy the hangtags are getting two free hours everyday now. Ms. Mailander stated that they would have to discuss what they were going to have to discuss how much they would charge next year. Councilman Voigt stated that it was an additional $375 that they were losing with the hangtags now through the end of the year so it was something that they should look into sooner rather than later.

  1. RESOLUTION

 

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 18-263 THROUGH 18-267, WERE ADOPTED BY A CONSENT AGENDA WITH ONE VOTE BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, AND WERE READ BY TITLE ONLY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Mayor Hache, seconded by Councilman Sedon, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Special Public Meeting was adjourned at 9:33 P.M.

______________________________

                                                                                                     Ramon M. Hache, Sr.                                                

Mayor                        

______________________________

              Donna M. Jackson

       Deputy Village Clerk

  • Hits: 2394

20180228 Village Council Work Session

A REGULAR WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOD, NEW JERSEY ON FEBRUARY 28, 2018 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

  1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 7:33 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call the following were present: Councilman Hache, Deputy Mayor Sedon, Councilman Voigt, Councilwoman Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen.  Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; and Donna M. Jackson, Deputy Village Clerk.

Mayor Knudsen led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag as well as a Moment of Silence to honor the men and women serving our Nation, our first responders, and all those who suffer needlessly from violence.

  1. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Knudsen asked if there were any comments or questions from the public.

Gary Cirillo, 260 South Pleasant Avenue, stated that he is the President of Project Pride, which is a civic organization that does all of the plantings downtown, he added that he knows the Council is coming up on the Budget beginning this weekend, and asked that the Council understand that any picture that is taken of the downtown always includes an aspect of Project Pride whether it be the flowers, the kissing balls which have become the snowflakes, so on and so forth. He added that he thinks this year their duties will be increased, and they will be asked to water some trees so with all that said he asked that the Council take that into consideration.

Mr. Cirillo added that he wanted to appeal to the Council to consider some construction, with the new housing and things that are coming into the town he feels that the Village could greatly benefit from a better bicycle stand across from Bagelicious, perhaps something with a roof on it that would encourage more people to take bikes. This would allow them to be covered and the Village could encourage more people to use bicycles to get to work. Mr. Cirillo added that right now it is very haphazard as the grass isn’t cut around there and it looks terrible and is not inviting for someone to take a bike. He is hoping that the Village can lead the way in that regard and have one of the best bike facilities for all of the commuters.

Mr. Cirillo also added that he wanted to approach the Council about possibly building a pickleball court somewhere in the town, as the Council is aware this sport has taken off and the dimensions are much smaller than a tennis court and there is a great need for it. He added that the goal would be to have it somewhere at Vets Field. He’d like to make Vets more of a sports area where people could come and do a multitude of things. The only things that are missing right now are basketball and tennis (which is just too big to put in), but he has approached the Council before about basketball and perhaps pickleball. Mr. Cirillo also added that a final issue was along the path to perhaps having some exercise equipment at certain points, known as stations, where people can do chin-ups and other exercises so that anyone who visits, such as when the weather is warm and it is used all day, he would like to see Vets used to its greatest ability.

Mr. Cirillo stated that as the Village builds for the future and as there are more people coming to town and there will be a need for more things.

Denise Fabiano, 618 Spring Avenue, stated that she was there on behalf of JOLT to ask the Council to sign a resolution opposing a bill pending in the Senate called the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 or CCRA. She stated that first she wanted to say what this Resolution is not about. It is not about any changes to our Second Amendment Rights. It is about this State’s right and this community’s right to have its own laws apply to everyone who is physically in our State whether you live here or whether you are visiting from Louisiana or Pennsylvania or any other State.

Ms. Fabiano added that if the CCRA becomes law it would require each State to recognize the concealed carry standards of every other State. In other words, as long as a visitor to our State has a permit to carry in their home State, they can carry here too. So, what does that mean. New Jersey has among the toughest gun laws in the Country, not surprisingly we also have one of the lowest gun violence rates ranked number 45 out of 50 States. New Jersey requires that anyone who wants to carry a concealed weapon be 21 years of age, and go through a rigorous vetting process. It includes safety gun use training, a background and reference check, and to demonstrate what’s referred to as a justifiable need to carry. She added it was not easy, and in contrast there are 12 States that don’t require any permit at all including Vermont, Maine and New Hampshire. In Pennsylvania, a State that borders us, no safety training is required and people with violent, criminal, or domestic violence convictions, as well as teenagers are allowed to carry. Ms. Fabiano stated that if the CCRA becomes law they will be allowed to carry here too.

Ms. Fabiano stated that to get a concealed permit in New Jersey, right now an individual has to go to local law enforcement and then go before court. Perhaps that’s why law enforcement has overwhelmingly opposed this legislation. It’s been denounced by the Fraternal Order of Police, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the Police Foundation, and the Major Cities Chiefs Association which includes the 66 largest law enforcement organizations in this Country. She added that people are allowed to carry their weapons through our State, that has always been the case under New Jersey law, they just have to carry it locked up in a manner that has been specified by Statute. They cannot keep them in their pocket as they walk around the street or drive down Route 17 and that is a decision that our State has made. She stated that New Jersey has a high-density population and she, for one, wants to know that when she is walking down the street or sending her child to a concert that someone from a neighboring State isn’t standing next to them with a gun in their pocket without having been put through the application process that is required here in New Jersey.

Ms. Fabiano stated that in closing, she just wanted to ask that the Council remember that under the CCRA a resident of our town would be denied a permit to carry in New Jersey if they had a criminal conviction. However, a resident from another Sate with that same conviction would be allowed to carry here with their out of State permit. That just can’t be, and that is what this resolution is about.

Ann Burton Walsh, 112 South Irving Street, stated that she serves as President of the League of Women Voters of Ridgewood. She was there tonight to respectfully request that the Village Council consider signing the Resolution that Denise from JOLT just presented that opposed Federal Concealed Carry. Since it’s National Convention in 1990 the League has supported gun safety. Last fall, their local board heard from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence as well as MOMS Manned Action regarding this proposed legislation. Since their directors meeting the Bill has passed the House and their State League has decided to allow local Leagues to oppose it. Ms. Walsh added that when their League board heard of JOLT’s initiative this month they took the opportunity to sign on to continue the Leagues work on this issue.

Ms. Walsh stated that as a review to Ms. Fabiano’s point, in 2008 the Supreme Court stated that like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. Citizens’ rights under the Second Amendment may be restricted if such restrictions are substantially related to important Governmental objectives, such restrictions therefore do not constitute infringement of those rights. She added that New Jersey has restrictions in place, including standards for concealed carry that are tailored to the important objective of safeguarding the public of this State which is the most densely populated in the nation. Ms. Walsh stated that other States have lax permitting laws for concealed carry and some States don’t require permits at all. The question now is whether a gun owner from one of those States may, under Federal law, carry a gun into a more restricted State against that States wishes and concern for public safety.

Ms. Walsh stated that as the National Review stated in an article about the proposed law, it is the States rather than the Federal Government that should decide the question of reciprocity. State legislators know the reasons behind their own permitting regimes and are thus well equipped to decide whether other States policies are similar enough to justify recognizing their permits. A sovereign State that requires its own citizens to meet certain requirements before carrying a concealed weapon should be allowed to demand the same of non-residents. She added that the article continued this is a question not of what the policy should be, but of who gets to make the decision. Sometimes Congress must protect Constitutional Rights against infringement by State governments. Other times it is impractical or otherwise problematic for each State to chart its own path. Neither justification for Federal action holds here. Ms. Walsh urged the Village Council to take a stand against this unjustified Federal action and in support of New Jersey and New Jersey voters by signing the Resolution.

Bonnie Chalek, 110 Sheridan Terrace, stated that she is a resident and an active member of the Bergen County Brady Chapter which is part of the Brady Campaign. The Brady Campaign began after Jim Brady who was Assistant to the White House Press Secretary under Ronald Reagan was shot along with President Reagan. Ms. Chalek stated that Jim Brady was permanently disabled and devoted the rest of his life for getting universal background checks. Thirty years ago, working for common sense gun laws was a bipartisan issue which is should be today because its all about public safety. She stated that she has been following gun violence reports daily since Sandy Hook and although mass shootings capture the attention of the nation she has found that if you take out inner city gang violence, the homicides are mostly due to toxic male anger whether its domestic violence situations or someone who gets angry in a Louisiana movie theater or a Florida gas station and wants to settle the score with shooting a gun.

States that have recently passed lax concealed carry laws have also seen an uptick in road rage incidents where guns were used. Ms. Chalek stated to the Council, can you imagine this happening on Route 17 or in a New Jersey mall packed during the holidays. States with the most lax gun laws have the highest gun fatalities. In contrast, New Jersey has strong gun laws. We shouldn’t be forced to accept National Concealed Carry on the terms being accepting the weakest rules from the weakest States on gun safety. A Town Council does not have the authority to enact gun legislation, it can pass a resolution that provides a voice from its residents to our Federal and State officials that we feel more guns on our street is not the answer. This is a public safety issue and she hopes the Council passes the resolution.

Dr. Judy Lustwig, former Ridgewood resident living in Washington Township 451 Beech Street, stated she is a retired neurologist who worked at Valley Hospital for 16 years and she was asking Ridgewood if they would please sponsor a sister rally in solidarity for the Parkland students March 24th at Vets Field at 10:00 A.M. She stated that we have all seen these students and have seen their amazing dedication, passion, intellect in the face of tremendous tragedy and grief. She thinks they need the adults to help them and she would like to do that. Dr. Lustwig added that this was not a referendum on the Second Amendment this is just to advocate for common sense gun laws. She added that people may ask why Ridgewood. Well, Ridgewood is in the center of Northern Bergen County, and as far as she knows there is a rally or a march in Newark, there is one in New City, one in New York. The internet says there may be one in Morristown the internet says there is but the students themselves don’t note it as another venue. So, Ridgewood needs one here. She has spoken to a lot of people that live in surrounding towns that would all love to come here. Also, besides this she wanted to get in a couple of points.

Dr. Lustwig added that remember she is a neurologist, and the frontal lobes are responsible for impulse control, rational thinking, critical thinking, executive planning, organization, etc. They are not fully developed until people are at least 25 years old, so it really makes no sense to allow 18 years olds to possess assault weapons which should be only used in times of war. She added that she heard the woman from the NRA say we let the 18 year olds who are in military action have the right to hold a gun so why shouldn’t all 18 year olds have the right? Well they are a special group of people who are very patriotic. They’ve undergone tremendous education to learn how to handle guns safely, how to use them properly, and they are under adult supervision. So, that really is not a good argument as far as she’s concerned. Dr. Lustwig stated that the second thing she wanted to say is that she read an article in The Atlantic written by the radiologist who saw the CAT scan of the injuries that the assault weapons generate in people’s bodies and its astounding. Mayor Knudsen stated that she had reached her time limit.

Karen Feder, 817 Morningside Road, and Maddie Leluc, 166 Foster Terrace, introduced themselves. Ms. Feder stated that she and Miss Leluc were from the Ridgewood Cambodia Project and their organization is celebrating its 10th anniversary this year. While they have clubs in four schools in town they realized that folks who don’t have school-aged kids don’t really know about the work that they are doing. Ms. Feder stated that they work in Cambodia because the country is still struggling years after the genocide of the 1970s and the Civil War that followed. In 2009 the Ridgewood Village School in Cambodia was built and a group of Ridgewood folks, including Maddie and her family, have been going to visit and support their school ever since. They have accomplished a lot in the past 10 years. They provide an English computer teacher, internet service, computers, a printer, school supplies, books, water filtration systems, and their favorite is a teacher training program for both their middle school and the neighboring primary school.

Ms. Feder stated that one of their goals was to make the community of Ridgewood more aware of what they are doing and involved in their project. So, for their 10th anniversary celebration they are bringing a little bit of Cambodia to Ridgewood. Miss Leluc stated that she was in the 4th grade at Orchard Elementary School and last year in February she had the opportunity to go to Cambodia. She stated that as soon as she arrived she was mind-blown on how poor the Country has become and going to a sister school felt astonishing. To teach, play and communicate with kids halfway across the world felt awesome and she made so many friends that she still remembers and will remember her whole life. Miss Leluc stated that before she left, she had a fundraiser at her school where people donated colored pencils and crayons which she later gave to all grades at their partnering school.

Miss Leluc added that she got so inspired she decided to start a Cambodia Club at Orchard and teach her classmates about Cambodia and all they ways they can help just like her. That’s why on March 8th, next Thursday night, all the kids from the club are having a celebration at the Ridgewood Public Library where kids from all the clubs who participate can talk about their experiences. They have two special guests, a traditional Cambodian dancer is coming up from Washington, D.C., Seradia Biv, and Film Producer LinDa Saphan an Associate Professor from Mount Saint Vincent’s College will talk about Cambodia today and the need of education. Miss Leluc stated that there will be food, drinks, and light refreshments served and special beautiful items from Cambodia will be sold, too. If anyone is interested in the club or would like to attend the event, she encouraged them to take one of the fliers and stated that she hopes they will join the club at the Ridgewood Public Library next Thursday from 6:30 P.M. to 8:30 P.M.

Mayor Knudsen questioned whether there was a website for the Cambodia Club. Ms. Feder stated that they are the RidgewoodCambodiaProject.org and they are also on Facebook as the Ridgewood Cambodia Connection, and if anyone would like to contact her it is RidgewoodCambodia@gmail.com.

Donald Leibreich, 219 Hope Street, stated that for five years he has been heading up the upgrading of the Village Community Center. At first they used the Community Center Advisory Board to begin with and later, a charitable corporation to raise money and pay for the improvements they have made. They thank the Council for resolution #18-17 accepting the improvements they have made. Mr. Leibreich stated that all of their work was done with the great coordination of Parks and Recreation, Nancy Bigos and Deanna Schablik. Also, a group of twelve diligent Ridgewood volunteers has been with him for these five years, headed up by Gwenn Hauck and Bill Carbone and Jen Griffith. He added that having established a charitable corporation, some of their members applied for a grant from the Taub Foundation and Beth Abbott and Sheila Brogan have been very successful in launching Age Friendly Ridgewood. They have been so supported in all of their efforts and given advice by Deputy Mayor Sedon and Janet Fricke, who have been great additions to their group. Mayor Knudsen thanked Mr. Leibreich for all of his work.

Jan Bottcher, 425 Fairfield Avenue, stated that she was here in support of the Concealed Carry Resolution. She added that others who have spoken before her have very articulately expressed the reasons that she supports this as well and she just wanted to add her voice to theirs and ask the Council to please pass the Resolution.

Saurabh Dani, 390 Bedford Road, stated that he was before the Council today to talk about the presentation on the agenda regarding WaterSmart, and asked if the Council could clarify a few points first. There was a mention of variable costs based on the number of reports generated. What is a report. If a customer or end user looks at their analytics will that be a report. Or, the Village Manager had mentioned it was the number of mailings that would go out to inform the users about the benefits adding that the Village has a lot of newsletters going out. He is wondering why a third-party vendor would have to be paid to send letters to residents. Mr. Dani stated that Ridgewood Water has newsletters and email addresses and can do promotions without paying a third-party vendor. He would like it to be clarified what that report is, what is that variable cost, and what is the upper limit of the variable cost, because a lot of times these variable costs can go completely out of scope.

Second, Mr. Dani would like the WaterSmart presenters to clarify what is the single sign-on because right now in the billing software when he creates an account he does not have to provide an address. Anybody in the world can create a sign-on. All they need is an email address and user name to create an account. Then using that account they could look at anybody’s water bill. If they were to have the IP address they could look at the water bill. He added that in single sign on for the app they would have to add the number of family members and the profile. Does that mean that anyone who logs on once can then go to the WaterSmart software and then look at anyone’s information.

Mr. Dani stated that third, he was wondering how these two systems would connect. What is the single sign-on capability and how are they limiting the access only to that family for their account. Now all he needs is an email address and can create five accounts using five email addresses. He stated that single sign-on, privacy, and variable pricing were his main concerns, adding that variable pricing is how software kills clients because they start small and the fee just keeps going up as more storage or reports are used. This is similar to what happened to the Village in the Parkmobile scenario.

Mr. Dani appreciated the presentation on the parking garage process, and the thanked the Council for making a lot of progress on that. He keeps asking and he needs some responses as to what is the official process. He doesn’t want to continue coming here, or commenting, or sending an email and hoping that the Mayor will respond to that email. The residents need an official process where they see an anticipated problem or have a question on a particular process and they can file a case, and maybe it is assigned a case number, and there is an official resolution, it can be closed. He added that if it is a closed session type thing the Council could say that they have completed their investigation, but residents need some official process.

Patricia Infantino, 6 Betty Court, stated that she was here for something regarding the Zabriskie-Schedler House. She also wanted to say to the Council, to please support the resolution for concealed carry weapons that all of the Mayors are doing. She thinks it is something that Ridgewood should do as well.

Regarding the Zabriskie-Schedler property and the house, Ms. Infantino added that she is delighted that tonight the Council is going to vote on the Schedler house and it will finally get the roof. She added that she was going to read from her husband’s notes about the approval of the Schedler ad-hoc committee’s recommendations. He could not be here tonight, and he has warned the Council about the health risks of children exercising in the proximity of a busy highway. He wonders if the Council has done due diligence and consulted Public Health officials in regard to the risk.

Rurik Halaby, 374 Evergreen Place, stated that he was in total support of what Ann Burton Walsh has said. In his own way, today he decided to support that Dick’s Sporting Goods Store, which banned the sale of these weapons, and he placed a small order as a token that people care. The madness has got to stop, and gun-toting people have to be kept under control.

Mr. Halaby stated that as far as Schedler was concerned, he would not spend a penny until the Village comes up with a study as to why the house is historic. We need to come up with a plan as to what the Village is restoring it too and also what it will cost. He added that last time when he raised this point he was disappointed that someone on the dais had no idea of the cost. He stated that he was pleased that the Village Manager did not throw the lifeline because nothing has been put together as to what things are going to cost. No one has said anything about what it will be used for or what the costs of maintenance and operation will be, as we are talking about millions of dollars in the long run.

Mr. Halaby stated that he remembers when the Council was talking about the garage one of the members of the Council to prove her/his bonafides as being a fiscal conservative basically said, “A garage is a garage” and let’s go for the cheapest looking thing. He added that $1 million dollars is what it will take to go from a cheap horrible looking garage to one that we and our grandchildren would be proud of. Mr. Halaby stated that the Village spends money like crazy, $23,000 on this ill-fated valet parking, and now spending $1.5 million on the Elks Lodge. The Village will be spending $1 million on what have you, so let’s bear in mind where our money is going, and the Council should be fiscally responsible.

Mr. Halaby added that he called the firm of Connolly and Hickey and he spoke to Mr. Connolly and he was amused because he caught him off guard. Mayor Knudsen signaled that his time was up.

Jeanne Harris, 625 Hillcrest Road, stated that she was here to voice her support for the Concealed Carry Resolution, she understands that is a resolution and the Village is not making Federal Law. She did do a little bit of research and when she was starting out she was thinking that not everybody does have stringent requirements like New Jersey does and she did have the benefit of living in the south for almost a decade and there are differences in the States.

Ms. Harris stated that when she started researching it disturbed her when she found a Boston University study that came out for 25 years there are 12 states that require no permit at all, nine states including Massachusetts give Police Chiefs wide discretion over whether or not to issue the permit, and 29 states require permits but give Police Chiefs little or no discretion. This concerns her very much as everyone knows this is a Village and it is populated here. She is not comfortable with people from other States who do not have our stringent laws and requirements coming here with a concealed gun. She does not want to be in the Stop and Shop next to somebody who could be from a State where there could be no requirement. Ms. Harris added that she does not want her children in Rite Aid, or at the Warner Theater, or sitting in Daily Treat with somebody with a firearm. This is something that really is very important to her as a parent and a resident of this Village and she urges the Council to consider this and hopefully approve the Resolution.

Catherine Brienza, 364 Graydon Terrace, stated that she wanted to acknowledge the hard work of the Council and that she supported the Concealed Carry Resolution which was so articulately presented. She also wanted to say that the students are working really hard, being really brave and being really public, and our town needs to work really hard, be really brave and be really public. This resolution may be more symbolic but it is a voice, and our voices have to be raised and our legislators on the national level have to listen. We can’t let them down so she is hoping that the Council can see its way to sign the resolution.

Alexandra Wagschal, 15 Circle Avenue, stated that as a parent, she wanted to state her support for the Concealed Carry Resolution and thank the people present who spoke so eloquently. She added that she is also the President of the Somerville Home School Association and she wanted to raise the question if it would be possible for the Village to consider placing a crossing guard at the intersection of Spring and Kenilworth. It has been brought to their attention that there was a crash there a few weeks ago and there were students on the way to school. Her own daughter had to make her way around the car while the Police were tending to it. Mr. Wagschal added that it rose her concern along with a woman who is a parent at the school and lives on the corner and as well as other parents have said that it is a very dangerous corner. She often sees people running the lights which makes it hard for the kids to cross. She understands there are limited resources but she does feel it is a dangerous situation that would benefit from a crossing guard.

Mayor Knudsen stated that public comment was now closed, and she was going to give some feedback. Regarding Mr. Cirillo with Project Pride, she stated great work, and the idea of a bike stand that is covered sounds really terrific. She added that to the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Resolution, she wanted to correct someone that it is not a ban on concealed carry, it is a concealed carry reciprocity resolution that is crossing State lines utilizing the concealed carry guidelines of your State crossing into New Jersey or to any other State. Mayor Knudsen added was not on tonight’s agenda but would be added to the Work Session agenda for March 7th. She stated that regarding the Cambodia Project, the Council will give them a plug and make that announcement. Mayor Knudsen stated that Mr. Dani’s concerns would be responded to with the WaterSmart presentation. Finally, to the Kenilworth issue, the Council met last Friday in the rain. They are taking a couple of initiatives by implementing double-faced stop signs and looking at the intersection. When the Council was standing there, they realized that everyone was racing up the hill to get to the light. She added that it was her neighborhood, so she can go over there. She also knows a lot of people living at Spring and Van Dien. There are a lot of near T-bones. So, the Village will be doing the same there.

Mayor Knudsen stated that the Council would take a motion to suspend the Work Session and convene a Special Public Meeting. Deputy Mayor Sedon moved the motion, and Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING - SEE SEPARATE MINUTES

Mayor Knudsen called for a motion to adjourn, there was a motion by Councilman Sedon to adjourn the special public meeting and reconvene the Work Session. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

  1. PRESENTATION

 

Mayor Knudsen thanked Ms. Hickey and Janet Fricke for their work on the Zabriskie-Schedler Property and stated that she appreciated their energy and effort, adding that this is a bittersweet project.

  1. WaterSmart

Ms. Mailander stated that the Council had some concerns about metrics and various things with the WaterSmart Customer Portal. She stated that Mr. Dani was here this evening to express his concern, so there is a representative from WaterSmart here to give a brief presentation and answer questions directly. Ms. Mailander stated that they brought him back because it was something that some of the Council members expressed concerns about and felt that if they had additional information perhaps they could have voted a different way.

Mayor Knudsen questioned before the presentation began if the representative from WaterSmart had all of Mr. Dani’s questions, he replied that he did.

Erik Andersen, from WaterSmart, stated that he wanted to call attention to the presentation as he thanked Mayor Knudsen, Deputy Mayor Sedon, Councilmembers, staff and members of the community, adding that he was happy to be there tonight at the Council’s invitation to address their questions and those of the community. He stated that he was going to try to take about 15 minutes to run through some information about WaterSmart and what they do, as he wants it to be different from what was heard in the prior Work Session so that the Council is clear on some of the questions. Mr. Andersen added that he was pleased with the engagement and interest in the community. He was there because they are accountable for every customer that they serve, in every community that they serve, so he was going to go through a few things, and in particular he wanted to speak first about the context as he had a few handouts.

Mr. Andersen stated that he wanted to give a bit of context and then talk about their goals and specifically how they would like to propose measuring success because that’s really important and then share some examples from other communities that they have served. He stated that water is a very local issue as every community is unique, every community is different. In this community there are 52 wells providing ground water. There is also purchased water that supplements this community and the neighboring communities that Ridgewood Water serves and there is a very high seasonal demand due primarily to irrigation in the summer months. Another thing that is happening is that consumer preferences and expectations of people in and beyond this room is self-service. People expect instant information; people expect personalization; people expect things that are relevant, timely, and topical to them. He stated that it’s the text from Chase that your deposit hit; it’s the information that you get when your shipment is delivered; people want to know what’s going on.

Mr. Andersen stated that Water Utilities are moving in this direction as well, so this is the context that’s happening not just for consumer products and consumer technologies but also utility services. He stated that individuals may also enjoy these today from electric or gas companies here in Ridgewood and neighboring communities. He stated that what he wanted to do tonight was present some hard numbers because he thought Councilman Voigt expressed some interest in quantification. He respected that and thinks it’s fair to ask for goals and some expectations they can hold themselves accountable to, and to corroborate with the community and the water utility team here.

Mr. Andersen stated that included in the WaterSmart subscription is a customer satisfaction survey. A lot of communities send surveys out from time to time about various topics. They did this specifically around water and they measure pre-WaterSmart and then 12 months later, and they want to measure how many people in this community say the Water Utility is excellent and they want to grow that number by 25 percentage points. They have seen that, they’ve proven it and he thinks they can do it here. So, he wants to improve this water service in the eyes of all the 4 communities it serves by 25%.

Mr. Andersen added that they want to bring community engagement and quantify that and measure it. How do they know people will use the software; how will people interact with it; how will people respond; and they want to measure what engagement means. He added that they also want to manage demand as there is a very high peak demand here and they want to create a goal of saving 50 million gallons of potable water in the first year. That is a substantial number but he thinks it is achievable based on the evidence that they have developed in the randomized control trials that they perform. They are happy to conduct a randomized control trial here in this community as well in the design of their approach.

Mr. Andersen summarized what has been seen about what the customers see and what the utility will see. He stated that the customer information is different than what is on the internet today coming from Ridgewood Water. So, speaking to one of the earlier questions from public comment, the present-day information that the customer would see is going to be different as it looks on the screen. The upper left shows an illustration of the customer portal which he could take the Council into later if they would like to see it. Mr. Andersen stated that they also deliver alerts in the preference of the customer. So, if they would like they can receive a text when WaterSmart thinks there’s a leak. If they want they can get a call.

Mr. Andersen stated that there are also two kinds of reports that he has handed out. One is a welcome letter that invites people to participate and explains the process. It is done separate from the bill; in color; personalized; and relevant because they know that this is more effective than a bill insert. He added that the Village may also want to promote this through a variety of other channels that they have. WaterSmart provides a marketing kit for the community whether they want to put things on Facebook; or on NextDoor; or on a bill insert; or on a bus. That is fine and WaterSmart will provide assets to help promote WaterSmart. The reports that he speaks of are Water Reports, and they are proposing to do four reports per year and are delivered to the account holder. So, it is not a report that is extracting something from a database, but these are actually personalized home water reports that give a social comparison to the residential customer on their use relative to others. WaterSmart knows that social norming and behavior science works to get people to understand what they are using is normal or out of the ordinary and to give context. WaterSmart creates a lot of context and has done a lot of work on this.

Mr. Andersen stated that lastly, one of the great things about Ridgewood is that meters are read monthly yet billed quarterly, so they want to be able to provide leak alerts based on that monthly data. If WaterSmart sees things that are out of alignment based on the season they want to be able to let customers know in advance. If they have seen the hose has been left on; the water softener is running; the kids left the spigot open; maybe there was a toilet leak that has been running; they want people to be able to identify this because it will eventually turn into calls and painful and difficult conversations with the community. Mr. Andersen stated that leak alerting is one of the most powerful tools that they have seen as far as outcome. He added that for the Utility they are also providing a rich set of analytics and reports. There are over 50 reports so there is faster information and they wrote the reports because of people like the Council who want to know what is going on or want to provide information to the EPA or regulators and need this information quickly and accurately.

Mr. Andersen added that WaterSmart can visualize through mapping and then have metrics in the software so the Council knows and its transparent and clear what’s happening with WaterSmart and all of those metrics are provided in the software. The last thing in the lower right of the Water Report is Group Messenger which they can provide for the Village to use in emergency and non-emergency settings. It has been really amazing to see the uses the communities have for this, whether it is hydrant flushing; a main break; boil water notice; or a picnic. They have seen all types of uses for this Group Messenger.   He added that they do allow the water utility to draw shapes in the community and if they want to send a message to this neighborhood, or this street, or this metering district in the metering system and let them know about something that is important, or not so urgent but they want to let people know about it. Mr. Andersen stated that WaterSmart does not charge any variable costs for sending texts or emails or automated voice calls. So, Ridgewood Water can use this, however he added that they do not recommend it as emergency reverse 911 because that is something that Law Enforcement or those in charge of 911 services should control. However, this is very helpful for public health information related to water or public works information related to maintaining water service.

Mr. Andersen stated that he had some quick comparisons and contrasts; he has four scenarios. Improve customer service; the old way is to pay the bill every quarter; the new way is to present information 24/7 to customers that’s rich, relevant and in context; understand their bill and their consumption in context. In terms of funding, he wanted to speak to some of the other questions about how WaterSmart would measure success. They think about these calls or bill disputes or making it easier for folks to pay online, set up autopay, or take their bill by email. These are all ways that we are moving and more and more people are adopting these methods for getting information through their smart phone, through their tablet, through their desktop, through their laptop, or through text, and WaterSmart is making this available to Ridgewood and other communities that they serve. He added that there are real savings when some of this work can be done through customer self-service and transparency and providing this to customers. WaterSmart and Ridgewood are a team as they are both accountable and delivering together. There are also real costs because water has to be acquired, treated, pumped, and transferred within the community. If those real costs can be saved through demand management by bending the demand curve through this kind of information, the Village can see lower pumping costs, lower water treatment costs, and lower customer service costs and that is what they are trying to achieve.

Mr. Andersen stated that WaterSmart has examples from many utilities that they have worked with that have between 15,000 and 30,000 accounts, and Ridgewood Water has 21,000 accounts. They have seen measurable real increases in customer satisfaction from the community based on thousands of responses. They can also see enhanced program participation, explaining that every water district has programs whether it is “high efficiency toilet rebates,” “replace your grass with needed plants,” or “workshops on composting.” There is a wide range just based on the geography, the climate, and the water needs of the community. In particular, lead and copper testing is a requirement where water samples have to be taken from within someone’s home and you need their participation and consent. So, they will be able to use WaterSmart to say that they need more participants. The Village has based the data properties that are appropriate for this kind of testing because Ridgewood Water wants to ensure that the water supply is within the appropriate levels of lead and copper.

Mr. Andersen stated that next, they want to improve communication and transparency. The old school way is bill inserts and newspaper advertisements. What they see now, is the need for targeted, timely, and topical communication. For example, what is happening in the customers home, or if somebody in an apartment needs information versus someone who lives in big lot versus the hospital. So, WaterSmart needs to provide relevant information for all of those stakeholders and let them choose how they want it to be whether that is email, print, text, or voice. Mr. Andersen stated that they want to be able to reach customers in the way that they prefer. So, through this rich mix of print, alerts of different types, emails, and the portal for both phone and laptop, Ridgewood Water can reach customers and WaterSmart can measure whether they are engaging or not. It is their hope and expectation that they will reach 70% of the community within one year meaning they will respond, they will remember, they will value these services.

Mr. Andersen stated that he wanted to explain what WaterSmart does regarding payments and single sign-on. He stated that in the portal, there will be a way for customers to pay their bill, so one can see their water use historically based on a comparison on similar households with similar occupancy. They can see the rainfall, the temperature and the other information that helps them understand their water bill in context, and they can pay it. So, the customer can say it was really hot in July, or really dry, or they did this last July, or they are using less or more than their neighbors. So, they can pay it just as people can pay for their Uber in the app or when buying something through an online store.

Single sign-on in WaterSmart’s world is a secure payment processing service for credit cards and debit cards. They partner with those firms because it is a very specialized occupation to handle customer credit cards and banking information, and WaterSmart does not do that. So, the single sign-on they speak of, is a way to seamlessly present a payment interface in a secure manner without the credit cards every being available to anyone in this room or anyone at WaterSmart. Mr. Andersen stated that was what single sign-on was all about. So, it’s a unified platform for payments, consumption and communications.

Mr. Andersen added that within the portal on the phone or desktop, customers can go right in and see their usage, quick view bill, pay bill, and see some history and it is up to the Village what payment processor it would like. WaterSmart understands that the one that is in use or will be chosen is one that they are familiar with, have worked with, and are comfortable with. In terms of demand management, some may be familiar with the watering day restrictions that exist in the Village and then there are “sticks and carrots” that one can use to influence demand. He doesn’t know if enforcement is possible in neighboring communities because of the way the governments are structured. WaterSmart presents a way for people to understand how they compare, to see if they are more or less efficient than properties of similar size with similar occupancy, and then provide personal relevant ways in dollars and gallons. People understand those measurements. They understand what they can do if they want to save money and that matters for fixed income residents, low income residents, and those who have unexpectedly high bills or leaks in their side of the meter. Mr. Andersen stated that they wanted to deliver leak alerts as well because of Ridgewood Water’s monthly reads.

Mr. Andersen added that because evidence matters in terms of presenting outcomes, WaterSmart will work with Ridgewood Water and study with them the work they will do over the proposed term. There are three examples. First they did an extensive study with East Bay Municipal Utility District that serves the communities of Oakland and Berkeley, California which are very substantial suburban and urban settings. They had a third party compare the efficiency study where they saw 4.5-6.5% improved water savings from WaterSmart using a randomized control trial of residential customers. This past year, the University of California Davis did an energy water study which interestingly was looking both at the water savings which was consistent with their other findings. What they found was the stow over effect in electricity reduction that people once being exposed to WaterSmart were actually being more cautious of electricity consumption and used 2.3% fewer kilowatt hours during the summertime. That was unexpected and actually very interesting and exciting for WaterSmart and it was nice to have a peer reviewed study do that work and present those findings. Mr. Andersen added that as they work with other utilities similar to Ridgewood, he feels good about this goal and this expectation that WaterSmart will see 50 million gallons, 2.5% reduction in savings. In 12 months after four home Water Reports and the Welcome Letter, they would like to be able to come back to present the findings on customer satisfaction.

Mr. Andersen stated that he wanted to make sure that he addressed the questions from the community. He stated that he wanted to address privacy, saying that it is essential and is part of WaterSmart’s commitment to every community. As they serve over 4 million account holders, 10 million Americans, with WaterSmart today. So, they must create a private and secure environment for all of their customers, and they have to go through third party audits. That is one of the reasons also that they don’t handle the payment information because that is done by people who are really good at that.

Mr. Andersen stated that the privacy matters, and the current lookup is available on the Ridgewood Water website, and Ridgewood Water can decide to leave it up or take it down but is not related to WaterSmart. There are variable costs, for these home Water Reports because there are costs to print in color, personalize, tailor, target and create the content that makes it relevant to one household versus another and deliver it through the US mail and pay the stamp. He added that every community WaterSmart serves on contract can terminate in 30 days. So, if Ridgewood Water is not happy with them, there are 30-day termination rights in every contract that they have. Second, he is really happy to say that WaterSmart has flexibility in these conversations. If Ridgewood Water says they would like 4 Water Reports a year, but in 2019 they only want to do two or one then they call WaterSmart to work it out. That’s fine because every community is different and everyone has different needs and things change. The hot issue next year might be something different and so WaterSmart needs to be flexible because conditions change in each community. The needs change, the priorities change, and Ridgewood may have new water issues coming up a year or two from now that they will need to collaborate on.

Mr. Andersen added that everything WaterSmart does is very different between Texas, Massachusetts, and Hawaii. Water is very local and so they encourage the collaboration to make sure that it meets the needs of the community. He stated that he would stop there, and he was happy to show the software. Ms. Mailander asked if he would like to show a sign on before going to questions so that everyone could see what that looked like.

Mr. Andersen demonstrated the Utility View to look up an account holder’s information, what alerts they have subscribed to, their balance, and relevant consumption. A leak alert has been thrown in, and viewers can see the seasonal consumption for this account holder. WaterSmart intends to bring back data through January 2014 if the Village allows them to. So, from what he is displaying there is either a toilet running or water softener and so a leak alert would be thrown on that account. Then it is not only an alert to the customer but also it gives them the tools to diagnose the leak. Mr. Andersen added that WaterSmart actually has the only closed-loop self-service leak system that says how to check the toilet or appliances and so on.

Mr. Andersen wants the team here to see what the customer can see because it is very helpful when on the phone with someone to see what they can see and so he displayed the view of the Customer Portal on the desktop view. It shows a Home tab with key points for important notifications and alerts are on the right. He added that people have this notion of things that they want to do; they want to transfer service; they want to stop their service; they want to understand how to pay their bill. He added there were also tabs across the top with various things the customer can do. When he talks about viewing and paying bills, the customer can view past bills including the PDFs and the customer would have a Pay button. Clicking up to the track tab is where WaterSmart provides richer information that is available to the customer as well. This shows their historical consumption, and their consumption against temperature and precipitation. This is important for people understanding why things are happening, and then looking at historical consumption period over period; summer versus summer; quarter versus quarter. They can actually show people through their model where water is being used in their property, irrigation system, bathrooms, kitchens, so on. Lastly, there are a lot of priorities that the Village may have has a community under Recommended Actions.

Mr. Andersen stated that the things that matter, are often in the upper left and can be anything from a pharmaceutical announcement or a variety of priorities that Ridgewood Water may have, such as a water or wastewater perspective that they want to deliver to the communities, so the notifications are all prioritized based on the type of property, the season, and more.

Councilman Voigt stated that Mr. Andersen had mentioned that WaterSmart would perform research and he wanted to know if they do that on their own for Ridgewood and if that is part of the analysis. Mr. Andersen stated that they can if the Council would like. Councilman Voigt questioned if he could define what those outcomes are and a duration of the research. Mr. Andersen stated that they would recommend a randomized control panel. Councilman Voigt questioned what would happen if Ridgewood decided to put the research together and look at the outcomes and saw that the outcome wasn’t favorable. If it didn’t do what the Village thought it should and after a year, could the Village get their money back. Mr. Andersen stated that typically that is not how it is handled, but there may be other reasons that those outcomes would come to 2.4% or 2.7% or only 23% customer satisfaction he guesses they would have figured that out. Councilman Voigt stated that it was a good way for the Council to figure out if it was worthwhile, or not, but if they find out in the end its not worthwhile it would help the Village to say they didn’t want to use it anymore because it’s not helping us. Mr. Andersen agreed. Councilman Voigt asked if that would be a consideration. Mr. Andersen stated that they have not done that, but they could consider that, some sort of performance benchmark if that is important to the Council. Councilman Voigt stated that it was, and again if at the end it didn’t meet the benchmark the Village would make a decision as to whether to use it or not pay for it in full and he asked if that was reasonable. Mr. Andersen agreed stating that it was reasonable.

Councilman Voigt stated that the other issue that would help him is from a cost savings standpoint. There was one slide that said $89,000 a year in cost savings and he thinks that was from some of the printing and paper that goes out. Dan Timmeny, Business Manager, Ridgewood Water, stated that those costs are really broken out into three categories. Ridgewood Water looked at the projected budget that they are using for 2018. If they reduce their budget projection in each of those categories, and for example, they effect the demand curve and drive down demand by 2.5% which is the goal here for the program, they then multiply that 2.5% by the estimated budget figure in each of those categories and the associated costs that would accompany that reduction. He added that they are hard, actual, tangible costs that support the network that Ridgewood Water needs to push water into locations such as electrical power, maintenance of pumps and the electrical grid. Mr. Timmeny added that on the treatment side, that is a 2.5% reduction in things like chlorine and phosphate and hard, tangible chemicals. He stated that on the Customer Service side, it is something that Ridgewood Water is looking at now, and they think longer term, it would certainly be a reduction in staffing as they reconfigure their current and customer service staff to figure out how and what the ideal mix is, who is working on what projects, and they have projected $35,000.

Councilman Voigt stated that information was helpful, he added that the Village will be paying so much for this software in year one and it would be nice to see from a performance standpoint what the savings will be. He asked to look at the amount in total in terms of a conservative, optimistic range to help him understand that the Village will pay a certain amount in year one and what will they potentially save based on that expenditure. Mr. Timmeny added that there are two aspects of savings there, and that’s sort of what was indicated in the slide. One really deals with the types of call that come in to Customer Service, the reduction in costs associated with those types of calls, and the other is the hard costs associated with actually having the program and what that means for how much water is being pumped. He added that Ridgewood Water will identify that and certainly split it up for the Councilman. Councilman Voigt stated that he is assuming that if a study is done there are going to be appropriate statistics associated with it. So, the Village will be looking at statistically significant differences as opposed to just a slight difference. Mr. Andersen stated that WaterSmart has a data scientist on staff who they would bring in.

Deputy Mayor Sedon thanked Mr. Andersen and Mr. Timmeny for taking the time to come in and present this. He stated that this would basically bring Ridgewood Water into the 21st century and offer the same kind of portal that other utilities such as banks, credit card companies, things like that possibly have. It could also help with conservation efforts for people that are so inclined can go into and look at the water use, and see if it’s out of line. What else could it do for conservation efforts he questioned. Mr. Andersen stated that the Village could dial up or dial down the conservation voice in the software. They have seen utilities use this for programs like rebates where they actually might incent weather-based irrigation controls or maybe the Village would like to consider it for its municipal ball field. You might be able to measure the savings associated with doing something like that. He added that WaterSmart has also seen rebates for high efficiency toilets, dishwashers, or washing machines which are often done in conjunction with the power company. They have a library of over 250 different tactics and strategies to be drawn from that are available to the Village including everything from gardening and composting to coupons being given for different incentives. Mr. Andersen stated that they want people to be able to click on any of these indoor or outdoor recommendations and have a wide range of choices that are relevant to their household.

Councilwoman Walsh thanked the presenters and stated that her question was regarding the initial billing system and whether it was going to go away. Mr. Timmeny stated that no, Ridgewood Water has a billing contract separate and aside from this. So, their billing contract is for the actual background work on all of the data and incorporates all of the actual meters. It is the system that allows them to have an employee go out and read the entire system on a monthly basis in all four towns, and input that data into a billing system. Then they populate the bill, which has some features on it although it clearly has nowhere near the amount of things offered by WaterSmart. Mr. Timmeny stated that if someone does not want to participate in claiming their account on WaterSmart, we will be keeping access to them paying their bill, but they wouldn’t have access to the plethora of information that is available on WaterSmart they that. He stated that the billing contract is really for billing and reporting features. They use that company not just for billing but for function such as Ridgewood Water audits, reporting, questions on bills, water use consumption, various purposes. They are completely separate and would be working with WaterSmart in that they are pushing the data up to WaterSmart for them to use, but the separate billing company will remain.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that she has lived in Ridgewood for 20 years, and her bill every quarter is paid, they conserve, have a rain sensor, and she makes sure her kids don’t shower too long. She feels that the existing system is sufficient and she does not know that she personally would use any more of the data. Knowing there are some that would, and if a large percentage of customers never claim their accounts, will Ridgewood still be charged the same amount. Mr. Andersen stated that they sell by the meter per year and WaterSmart helps the Village through these vehicles that he shared. Councilwoman Walsh may be amazing and then when she sees the social comparison she may realize that maybe she isn’t. You never know until the data is presented in a social context. He added it’s a fact that there are some who may never log in.

Councilman Hache stated that most of the focus has been on the user satisfaction and interface which he gets as it is a portal for that purpose, and he thinks that one of the biggest problems in New Jersey is leakage as he read somewhere that the leakage rate in New Jersey is about 30% compared to 15% in the rest of the country. He questioned if WaterSmart has measured what the aggregate benefit to the systems is that they service from having a system that can hopefully catch leaks at an early stage and what the benefit or improvement has been in the leakage rate in those areas. Mr. Andersen stated that there are two types of leaks, the ones that WaterSmart measures are on the customer side of the meter. They don’t measure leaks that go through the mains in the community. He stated that they do quantify and share all of the leak information both with the account holder and the utility. Leaks in the mains are much harder to quantify as they don’t sensor those. The Village would need to install acoustic sensors on the distribution system to identify leaks. Councilman Hache questioned if this was more to identify the smaller leaks. Mr. Andersen stated that was correct.

Mr. Timmeny stated that Ridgewood Water has an escaping system at the Wortendyke facility that does allow them to have electronic control of moving water around various areas. If something significant is happening, they would see that but that isn’t to say that everything is caught. Unaccounted water is absolutely an issue they are focusing on and trying to always be cognizant of and that is where Capital investment is heard. The Capital Plan does address the ongoing issue of the age of mains in the system that were neglected for a period of time. So, this next phase of the Capital Plan really aims at what Councilman Hache is talking about and remedying the in the ground side of the transmission making sure that the information can support this on an ongoing basis.

Councilman Hache questioned if users would be able to receive alerts on their phones if they want to know whether they surpassed a 100 gallon per day mark. Would there be a way for a customer to get that and can the usage be tracked that way. Mr. Andersen stated that yes, to the extent that Ridgewood and the community reads the meters monthly, WaterSmart could provide monthly threshold alerts to the resident. If the community chooses to go to the advanced metering that is now available they can get hourly data which Ridgewood may choose to do in the coming years. WaterSmart can do those types of things on a daily basis if there is unusual activity on a given day. Ridgewood is currently only reading monthly so they can only provide based on those readings. Mr. Timmeny stated that longer term, the fixed network would be a very tangible benefit, but right now it is very possible that someone could go 90 to 100 days without any idea that they have had a leak. So, they panic when they see their bill or if Ridgewood Water happens to contact them. Ridgewood Water is absolutely concerned about a massive amount of water getting pumped and the costs associated with that and the customer is paying for that as it passed through the meter.

Mayor Knudsen thanked them for the presentation and stated that her first question was just in the context and whether WaterSmart said that Ridgewood would theoretically save 50 million gallons over what period of time. Mr. Timmeny stated 12 months. Mayor Knudsen stated so everyone understands the value of 50 million gallons can Ridgewood Water quantify that, to which Mr. Timmeny responded absolutely. Mayor Knudsen stated that one of her very first Council meetings someone made a comment about lost water, and she kept asking where the water was, find it, how much is that worth, because it is a finite resource, but just for the record Ridgewood has one of the lowest amounts of lost water, so maybe that should be cleared up because the Village’s numbers are very negligible. Mr. Timmeny stated that they look at the very granular level and are really trying to drill down to incorporate every potential source of lost water so they can get as close to an absolute figure as they can. Then they have a baseline going forward as there is a capital outlay for investing in infrastructure and replacement of mains that have been in the ground forever. Ridgewood Water knows that really is the source as they have done everything they can on the other aspects that would play into the unaccounted water percentage. Now they must make sure the other side of that transmission main, those pipes are good and support the amount of water that is being pushed through the system on a daily basis and they continue monitoring.

Mayor Knudsen questioned the software. She sees it as a more streamlined customer portal that is not “klunky” as we are accustomed to. She also sees it as a very valuable conservation tool and she doesn’t know what value to put on the conservation of a finite resource. So, she is not certain how those two things connect and she thinks that it is more valuable to conserve. Even though the Village has to be cognizant of the cost, she thinks it is a small price to pay for that effort. Mayor Knudsen stated that one of the issues raised was being able to go online if you have an account, you can pull up Councilman Walsh’s water bill as it is public information. So, to that end, someone would have to go back into that “klunky” system to pull that information.

Mayor Knudsen stated that it is public information, she can see late payments and she thinks it is a great collection tool. She thinks people will pay their bills on time, they get a notification, go to it and it will save them money on late fees. For the Village, she thinks if it is streamlined, people will pay their bill in a more timely manner. She asked if Mr. Timmeny would speak to those questions about public information and how someone might still be able to access it. Mr. Timmeny stated the question was raised with the existing provider MCC as to what information was publicly available. Currently, as some people pointed out, in other towns and municipalities none of this information would be redacted or withheld from an OPRA request. It is all going to be readily available; however, Ridgewood Water is going to look into whether removing account numbers, or redacting account numbers, is even something they could pursue in the next iteration of the contract.

Mr. Timmeny stated to that end, in WaterSmart there is a lot more information. Customers building up their portal would be behind a completely different wall and reporting things such as how many people are in their household, or how much water they are using relative to their neighbor. Ridgewood Water is going to look at what can be done on the legacy system; but, here it would be a different sign-on category where that information wouldn’t be available in the same manner.

Mayor Knudsen questioned the greater than 70% engagement in the first year and if that was average. Mr. Andersen stated that was correct, and what was projected for the Village of Ridgewood based on WaterSmart’s experience is a mixture of all different types of engagement that are available through this platform. Mayor Knudsen stated that she thought that was important dealing with customer engagement. The experience the Village had when there was a little problem, Ridgewood wanted to get information pushed out to the public and there were some difficulties and they had to use the County.

Mayor Knudsen asked whether the reports could be made available by email. Would someone have an option to not have it mailed. They are speaking about conservation and generating more paper, so why aren’t they using the same electronic systems to generate those reports and push them out. So, would that change the cost involved if that is possible. Mr. Andersen stated that the customer can choose to receive by email if that is their preference and it can affect the cost based on the mix of print versus email. Mr. Timmeny stated that on the early side, the point of having Water Reports is that beyond all of the really valuable information that a customer would receive on the report, they are going to have the welcome letter which an early touch point where someone is getting engaged with the platform. Reports are on an ongoing basis, and they are not going to decide today to use the maximum number of reports each year. This is something they will assess from a cost perspective.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she understood the reports would actually generate that engagement. She added that she had one more question regarding the last time a resident may have asked why the Village had to go through Rio to access the WaterSmart software if they could go to WaterSmart directly. Mr. Andersen stated that was a great question, and the way they sell and market their software is through distribution. There are 50,000 water agencies in the United States and they are a relatively small software company. It is difficult to reach 50,000 water utility companies so there are a number of meter manufacturers and distributors that serve these utilities. So, they found that the best way to get a young software company’s product to market was to hire a channel and Rio Supply; among others around the country; sell and market the software on WaterSmart’s behalf. Also, they help them with the specific Ridgewood and State of New Jersey requirements to qualify as a responsible and authorized provider of services, which is important to have that local understanding.

Mayor Knudsen stated that the discussion would be opened to residents, by taking a couple of minutes to see if there are any residents that have a question on this system.

Jan Bottcher, 425 Fairfield Avenue, stated this was the first time that she has seen WaterSmart and had a few questions. Mayor Knudsen stated she was going to limit Ms. Bottcher to about two questions as the Council was on a tight agenda and this was very out of the ordinary to allow residents to come up and ask questions in this kind of a presentation. So, just limit it and any additional questions please email and the Council can get the answers to her. Ms. Bottcher questioned, as a marketer, as to why the Village thinks that consumers really want to be that engaged. She stated there was the chart that said there were three goals: 70% engagement, 2.5% water reduction, and she couldn’t remember the third, but who’s goals are they, were they the Councils goals or Ridgewood Water’s goals. She understands what’s in it for WaterSmart, but she doesn’t understand what’s in it for the consumer. Ms. Bottcher added that there were also cost estimates about saving $20 an account here and $5 an account there, but her question is what is the additional cost to her as a consumer for all of these bells and whistles that she personally does not have a burning need for. She stated that she has more questions, but she is not convinced.

Mayor Knudsen stated that the engagement piece of this was pretty straightforward and that the Village is looking to access those customers in the case of an emergency, if there is a water leak, or some greater conservation effort. Mr. Andersen stated it very well that it may also help with Ridgewood’s water restrictions during the summer months. Mr. Timmeny stated that to be clear, as the person who manages customer service here in the Village, lots of people ask for this information all the time and it is a huge percentage of the calls every day and people want self service tools that Ridgewood Water currently doesn’t offer. They want information that is often easily fed back to them over the phone or via email but they don’t have a simple mechanism for a self-serve tool. He added that people want a portal akin to the Verizon bill or the PSEG bill. They want to know a lot of those basic usage questions and Ridgewood Water is unique in that they read monthly but bill quarterly, and as a result there is a delta there between what information is available to them at any moment in time and what is available to the customer.

Mr. Timmeny added that one practical application, and there are many, is landlord/tenant issues. People never call exactly on a billing date, that never works. They want to know how much water the tenant used, or the tenant wants to know before they get out of the lease how much water they used. Ridgewood Water has that information but there is no mechanism for people to have access to that, so that is one basic example. Anywhere between 33-40% of their calls would be self-service calls if they would have those tools, but Ridgewood Water just doesn’t have those tools right now.

Mayor Knudsen stated that just to remind Ms. Bottcher that this is a water utility purchase and there are customers in four municipalities. So, the demand isn’t just from Ridgewood, it’s not a Ridgewood resident taxpayer issue but a water utility and a customer base of four municipalities.

Saurabh Dani, 390 Bedford Road, stated that he had two questions, one for Mr. Andersen and one for Mr. Timmeny. First, if the Council decides that the customers don’t need these paper reports, will the costs be just for the fixed costs in a year. If the Council says they don’t need any paper reports the only thing different from the bill that he receives now is the chart that shows how he compares to others. If he doesn’t care how he compares to other residents will the costs be $36,000 a year.

Mr. Dani stated that the Mayor mentioned that our current software is “klunky;” he felt that another software shouldn’t be bought because the current software is “klunky.” The current software would be replaced by buying another software to put on top of it. Cost saving would result in terms of human capital and customer service, as well as a reduction in water usage. He asked if 50 million gallons less water are used what is the impact on revenue, not just the cost and cost reduction. Mr. Dani asked if Ridgewood Water actually identified the discounts.

Mr. Andersen stated that he can confirm with clarity and certainty that the $37,840 annual subscription for the software is all it is. So, if the Council or staff chooses to discontinue the Water Reports, WaterSmart still provides the customer experience, the analytics for the team here, as well as the outbound messaging for emergency or not emergency or service related issues. Mayor Knudsen asked to confirm the costs, and there was discussion about this.

Mr. Timmeny stated that in response to Mr. Dani the current billing provider, there is a billing company and a payment provider, and that company is MCC. That company has been acquired by a company with a better product called InvoiceCloud who is partnered with WaterSmart. He stated that was not by design, but just happens for Ridgewood Water to be gratuitous that this is the case. He added that billing is a separate entity than analytics. They are not the same thing and if there was one company that did all of those things that would be something that Ridgewood would look at, but as there are very niche markets with very niche skillsets they are pursuing different tools for different reasons.

Mr. Timmeny stated that Ridgewood Water’s billing provider charges for the services of the utility capturing meter reads, inputting them into the system, and then all the other reporting audit associated requirements. WaterSmart offers Ridgewood Water and the customer a lot of different benefits, so for them it is not that they are spending money to replace “klunky” software, they really are two distinct programs, features, and sets that will allow Ridgewood Water to do their job better and have more information with which to do their jobs.

Jacqueline Hone, 30 Carriage Lane, stated that she has had extensive experience in communicating with the water department on several issues in the past and she thinks they are doing a really good job the way it is, including once when she called and said she needed to know exactly from 8:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. what her usage was and how many gallons were used. Within an hour, they were able to get back to her via email. So, it was effortless. Her question is how is this different. It looks fancier. It’s at her fingertips, but so was her phone and she got the information she needed. She doesn’t know if she is willing to pay upwards of $100,000 just to have it look prettier. Her other question was about being able to identify leaks and how exactly that would be identified versus the case if there was a period that she knew water was being utilized excessively for an out of town guest for an extended period of time. So, how exactly would they really know where in her house there is a leak other than more water is being used.

Mr. Timmeny stated that he was glad to hear she has had a great experience with the customer service staff, and that the information that she requested would have had to be acquired from a data logger which is a feature within the meter. Not every meter in the system currently has it. Depending on how new your meter is, Ridgewood Water would be able to access that information Ms. Hone had requested. To get to that degree in the entirety of the system is longer term involving a fixed network, which is where utilities are going over the long term. Having access to hourly or several hours’ worth of data and being able to identify those leaks in real time, isn’t the case for everybody, so it is something that they are having to be cognizant of terms of cost. Mr. Timmeny added that meters are expensive to replace, they are on schedule, involving number of years and gallons, and so as a result this is by far the more cost-efficient approach for Ridgewood Water to take at this point.

Mr. Andersen stated that from a leak perspective, one can only identify irregular use so it is impossible to say this is a leak. What they found was the three most common words they get back in WaterSmart are “fixed, leak, and thanks.” There are times when it wasn’t a leak but people are grateful to know that there was irregular use on their property and they see it time and again on the data they collect. He added that if this community chooses to go to hourly data to everyone then Water Smart can provide that information on a near real time basis to the community.

There were no additional questions. Mayor Knudsen thanked Mr. Andersen for his presentation and stated that the Council will have to make a decision as to whether they want to bring this back. She thanked Mr. Timmeny and stated that she appreciated his vast knowledge of the system as well. Mayor Knudsen stated that she happened to love it and thought it was a nice system.

Deputy Mayor Sedon asked whether the Sustainable Jersey presentation could be moved up.

 

 

  1. Sustainable Jersey Award

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon began by introducing the members of the Ridgewood Green Team, chair, Jiffy Vermylen; George Wolfson; Bob Upton, also Chair of the Ridgewood Environmental Advisory Committee. Through their work and members who are not here, the Village of Ridgewood was certified this November through Sustainable Jersey at the Silver level. He added that there are only 49 towns in the State of New Jersey that are certified at that level, which opens up grant opportunities. They just got an email today that a $20,000 grant is in the works and so they will find out at the end of March if they do get that for a tree survey in the town, it is a matching grant, which will be discussed during the Budget presentation. Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that when they got involved the town was registered but it wasn’t anything else. So, Janet Fricke had some paperwork to start them out, and they had to go out into the Village and collect a lot of documentation. Their current application is 400 pages with all of the documents. It is a substantial amount of work, but it proves that the Village is focused on sustainability and conservation efforts. He would really like to applaud the membership for helping the Village to achieve this, and they are working on the Gold Standard now for waste and other things for Sustainable Jersey. So, it is a good thing for the community and Ridgewood should be proud that only 49 other towns have achieved this level of certification.

Jiffy Vermylen stated that she thinks it is very important to document the work that has been going on in the Village in order for the Green Team to really track and know what the opportunities are to keep pushing forward and if they don’t really keep track of what has been done it is hard to have a good and clear direction for moving forward. She thinks that the work of the Green Team and REAC to come together and really compile what others have done and Ms. Fricke had started was a meaningful step for the Village and she think it is really pointing the Village in the right direction. Hopefully they will get those grants, so they can keep marching ahead.

George Wolfson stated that it was also important to say that Sustainable Jersey provides a good road map for Councilmembers as it covers just about every single topic that could be thought of. Every commission or committee that they serve has a component or a chapter within Sustainable Jersey and these are programs that are pointing the way of the future for making things work in a municipality. He would urge the Council after the Budget meetings to take a look and see if there is something there that catches the Council’s eye.

Bob Upton stated that he had nothing more to add but urged everyone to put April 22nd on their calendar for the Village’s annual Earth Day event.

Mayor Knudsen thanked everyone for all of their hard work and commitment to the Village, to Bob, George and Jiffy, but she also wanted to point out that back in 2014 when the Council was behind closed doors trying to divvy up who was going to be on which boards and which committee. The only things left on the table was The Green Team, REAC, and Shade Tree Commission and everyone was walking in the other direction and the Deputy Mayor had nothing so he chose those committees. She has to say that no one has worked harder to keep the Village green and work on the environment, Shade Tree and REAC and she thought a round of applause was owed not just to the Committee members but to the Deputy Mayor. Ms. Mailander stated that she wanted to ask Deputy Mayor Sedon if there were representatives from the Shade Tree Commission as well; or if he was going to do a report. Deputy Mayor Sedon replied that he would do a report when it comes time.

 

  1. Walker Report on Hudson Street Parking Garage

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Council had reviewed a preliminary report a couple of weeks ago, and the revised final report has been received so she was going to have Mr. Rooney our Parking Director come up and give a summary of those two reports. One was a financial analysis and the other is an allocation study as to how the parking garage should be allocated.

Mr. Rooney stated that there were two reports that Walker has completed for the Village. The first phase of this process started in 2015 when the Village was considering putting up a 412-car garage and experts came in to explain how to fund this garage and how to make it so that it is self-sustaining and wouldn’t impact taxpayers as all of the revenue from the parking utility would be sufficient enough to pay for that garage.

Mr. Rooney stated that Walker came in and did the study in three versions, 412, 350 and ended up at 325 spaces and each time they put together a spreadsheet as to what the impact was and when the rates would have to change. He stated that now the Village has a 240-car garage and needs to understand what financing it needs to make that happen and make that operable, the key obviously is to maintain debt service coverage, that is critical. Mr. Rooney stated that Walker came in and based upon the information that they had from their first report, duplicated, retested it and came up with the conclusion as far as capacity, supply and demand, that there was definitely a need for additional parking. They did counts, made observations at certain times in the Village during different hours, and there are a couple charts that identify the times that they came in and what their findings were, what the capacity was, and whether or not the core area that they define had need for additional parking spaces.

Mr. Rooney stated that Walker went back and looked at the revenue streams he had provided to them for the last three years and determined that the smaller the garage the less revenue the Village will generate so it will require rate increases either sooner or higher than they initially anticipated. So they came up with, looking at the revenue stream the Village had in 2017, projected out all the way through for about 10 years and determined that in July 2018 the meter rates would have to increase 25 cents to 75 cents and the meter hours would have to extend to 8:00 P.M. In January of 2020 another increase of 50 cents to $1.25 and in January of 2025 it would need to go up 25 cents to $1.50. Walker also projected the need for increase in parking permits by about $25 in years 2020, 2023, 2026 and 2029.

Their findings were consistent with what Walker had in the past. They determined that in order to maintain debt service coverage this was the type of increase that the Village would have to entertain. Basically, if the Village had this garage in the position now where it wanted to start construction a rate increase would be affected in July and that money would then be accumulated into surplus so that when it came time to start making payments there would be sufficient funds to start paying that down as long as the revenue stream stayed the same every year. Mr. Rooney stated that the capacity of the garage was at the levels that they thought it should be and everything would move forward with a self-sustaining parking utility.

Mr. Rooney stated that Walker provided in their executive summary, and later on in their report, the expenses estimating that there would be approximately a 3% increase in the cost to operate the garage. He added that hasn’t been compared to the information that was obtained from the contractors last week. So, there are still some disconnects and the only way to resolve that would be to have everyone in a room and just hash that through. They estimated costs for the garage at a $12 million construction cost, a 25 year pay back on debt service, and at a 3% interest rate which is similar to what they did back in 2015, but Mr. Rooney thinks it was at a 2.5% interest rate.

Mr. Rooney stated looking at page 11 of the report shows their revenue summary by meters and permits as to what they anticipate with 2017 being actual and 2018 on is estimated cost. On page 12 is their estimate for operation of the garage, with $75,000 in allocations that are currently used for law enforcement, time for management, and things of that nature, which are charged back to the parking utility. Also, the repair, maintenance, and different operational expenses that they see for the garage. Because they are experts in transportation and garages, Walker has a large database which they use to determine the location of the garage, and weather in terms of maintaining surfaces. So, that is a lot of what they bring into this project.

Mr. Rooney stated that on page 13 where he was talking about the cost of the garage, the period of payback and interest rate, Walker has also the projected net operating expense and net operating income. Along the bottom it has debt service coverage assuming that debt service first payment would be in 2020. So, from the time the rate increase took effect in 2018, 2018 and 2019 surplus funds would be accumulating and then coming to pay covered debt service in at least a one to one ratio. He stated that was the rationale behind the timing of the increasing in the rates.

Mr. Rooney stated that the second report that they did was the user group allocation report, and this was to determine how many people or what type of parker should be using the garage. So, on page 1 of the report they indicate that it is recommended that 40% hourly users and 60% monthly users be split during normal business hours and then they also go on through the report to describe who should park where. So, obviously the ones that are permits will probably be there early in the morning catching the train. Walker recommended that they go upstairs, and those that would be there during the day for shopping or visiting restaurants would go downstairs as they would be going in and out of the garage. That is described on page 2 in the second report.

Mr. Rooney stated that they also talk about the types of systems that the Village can have to monitor the parking, a gated or an ungated system. The Village has been leaning to an ungated system as it is less costly and fits in with the type of parking enforcement in place currently. If the Village had ungated it would need someone to maintain it, and on call in case it doesn’t function, and they have to repair it. Mr. Rooney stated that ungated would continue to use a mobile forum for the parking in addition to having a kiosk available on each floor. Someone could park by plate and then law enforcement would monitor parking times by plate reader to determine whether there are any violations as they go through. So, each parking enforcement officer would have a handheld device as they do now, and they would use that data that’s downloaded on the spot to monitor the enforcement of the parkers. Mr. Rooney stated that was a high-level summary of these reports and he would try his best to field any questions that the Council may have.

Councilman Voigt questioned how much the permit tags for the garage would be per year, are they the $1000 per year permit that the Village has now. Mr. Rooney responded yes. Councilman Voigt questioned how much the tags would increase, to which Mr. Rooney stated starting in 2020, 2023, 2026, 2029 there would be an increase of $25. Councilman Voigt questioned what Mr. Rooney considered to be an appropriate debt service as he knows the higher the ratio. Mr. Rooney stated that the higher ratio the better. Councilman Voigt questioned what Mr. Rooney would consider safe, to which Mr. Rooney responded at least 1.5 and when this was first done with the larger garage the revenue stream was sufficient to get to approximately 1.5. Councilman Voigt questioned whether Mr. Rooney was concerned at all about the debt coverage approaching 1 on some of the analyses. Mr. Rooney stated that he thinks that when it gets to 1.09 that’s sensitive, but in the same token in the earlier years if you can build up enough surplus you could put money aside in a reserve to pay that debt service just like there is now in other authorities. A debt service could be put aside just for that purpose.

Councilman Voigt questioned whether the 3% interest rate seemed pretty reasonable or did Mr. Rooney think the Village could get a better rate than that. Mr. Rooney stated that yes, Ridgewood could definitely get a better rate than that, but they took a conservative approach. Councilman Voigt stated that there were a bunch of little tweaks to the report that may make the result better or worse. If the Village can get a better interest rate than 3%, he’s wondering if Walker can look at that. If they can look at spaces above 240 as there were presentations that had 250/260 spaces, and if the Village added 10-15 spots, what would that do to the revenue streams. He added that the other question he had is regarding parking permits for the garage. Why couldn’t those people have access to all of the area close to the train station so they could park at the garage or wherever they want, which is what the Village does now. Would that make a difference. Mr. Rooney stated that he didn’t think it would, but he would see if Walker could make the change.

Councilman Voigt questioned the $12 million as there were several proposals that were much less than that and could that be tweaked to closer to $11million. Mr. Rooney stated that it is his suggestion as the Village gets closer to getting that number finalized, but $12 million was where they started. Councilman Voigt questioned if Walker would be willing to look into the tweaks he mentioned, to which Mr. Rooney responded absolutely.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that he had a few questions, but to continue along the same line that Councilman Voigt went down, there are other minor tweaks to make. He noticed they said the annual parking pass was $750 and some of them are, but others are $1000. He, didn’t think that would change things dramatically, but it would change things. He coupled that with Parkmobile where they went off the current contract and asked if they used a 35% usage for Parkmobile or did they stay with the current 15% as the cost to the Village in their projections. Mr. Rooney stated that he thinks they just looked at the net revenue number not the cost. Deputy Mayor Sedon said that in the report, Walker said that right now its around 15% of people use Parkmobile, but generally that’s 35% in other towns and they figured that it would eventually go to that. Under the current contract, if it was that much the Village would lose a lot more revenue, but if they enter into a contract with either Parkmobile or someone else and it’s no longer a cost to the Village, then that might change the numbers a little more substantially and is that something that Walker would be willing to look at. Mr. Rooney was in agreement.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that being a commuter reading the reports, she was thinking what are we looking at, what are we expecting, and what are the taxpayers expecting. She wished Mr. Halaby was still there so that she could comment to him because when the Council was looking at the designs, she was looking at more of a basic design. The Village would get the same amount of spots whether or not the fancy façade was chosen. They are looking to get a parking garage to fill the needs that it has now and will have in the future. Councilwoman Walsh stated that there will be developments built within several blocks of the garage and whether those cars are onsite or not, she believes that they will have lots of cars offsite as well. This means they are either going to be in the street or in the lots whether they go down to Cottage or another lot, there is going to be this influx. She stated when she has visitors who meet her in town, they have to park somewhere.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that what she was trying to work through what’s going to be the habit that’s going to keep that garage full because ideally the Village is building the garage to change the pattern throughout the parking of the Village. She was thinking if the habit that they are trying to form is to get people into the garage so there’s more revolving use on the street which will get people into the shops and businesses more successfully. She didn’t know if Walker touched on that in the report. Councilwoman Walsh stated that she was trying to figure out how the Council could supplement that to figure out some of the costs because the parking pass is a fixed cost. Will the Village want every commuter parking there, or to start a habit of people thinking there is always a spot in the garage so they’ll go straight there. That to her is what is going to help this whole process and it is not going to happen overnight.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that once commuters are moved into the garage there will be a new use for the train station parking lot as it’s not going to be all commuters. Train station parking lot people are creatures of habit and usually park in the same spot and that would be her hope for the garage. So, if there are people who are using the garage who were always in the Village from 9:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M., wouldn’t you charge them a flat rate of $4.00 for that time frame as opposed to a per hour charge. The Walker report doesn’t touch on that at all. If she was going to park, she’s going to either swipe her card or do whatever to get in and then park, and then if she’s there for an hour she pays $3.00 or $4.00 the same as being there for three hours. So charging to park in different increments is what she was hoping to see in the report but she thinks the Council could supplement it with ideas for what they believe the habit or the use is going to be. She added that she liked a lot of the data in the Report but there is no crystal ball as to what the habit is going to be. Mr. Rooney stated that one of the things they point out on page 1 of the allocation report is the need to monitor the mix in the garage at one month, and three months. So, there is a large investment of time to make sure you get the right mix. To, Councilwoman Walsh’s point, he would think to explore who is parking in these other areas and where permit parkers are going is more than is in the report.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that her other concerns are in terms of enhancements of the revenue, because again the Village wants it to be a net zero. What is going to be the buy-in from the Chamber and the businesses as to what the Village is going to be doing with the garage.

Councilman Hache stated that he was looking at page 2 of the Executive Summary and under key assumptions, the new garage will attract roughly 50 commuters from outside of Ridgewood and that should be zero because the Village is not building the garage to bring commuters from out of town. So, he would like to see what happens to the assumptions when that is swapped out. He added that he didn’t see in the assumptions what they are assuming the Village will see in terms of premium parking passes versus regular. He knows that there was talk about trying to incorporate the current mix which is 210 premium versus 140 regular at some point in time and was that data in this redo of the report. Mr. Rooney stated that no it wasn’t.  

Councilman Hache stated that looking at the allocation of monthly versus hourly, he thinks one of the things the Village would want to do with this garage is to make sure that the Village knows with a great deal of certainty is how much of it will be paid for by January 1st of every year. So, he would go 3 levels for monthly parking and then the bottom level, which is really more realistic for people who are going to come in and out to shop. He thinks the mix would be 75%/25% and the Village would know at the very worst by January 1st of every year, 75% of the garage is paid for.

Councilman Hache added that another way to handle this is if the Village simply goes and sells more passes because it now has a garage that has done nothing to make a dent on the parking situation. So, he thinks keeping the commuter passes steady and pulling them from the other lots that are closer to the businesses, as a commuter, they would want to be closer to the train. He stated that he has another question, as Walker has a lot of experience dealing with different parking utilities throughout the United States and he trusts Mr. Rooney’s opinion as he has been running this utility for several years. Is Mr. Rooney comfortable with the assumptions made here in terms of the operating costs for the garage year to year. Also, does he think these are pretty accurate assumptions because Walker can tell what is a trend throughout the U.S., but Ridgewood might be even higher or lower.

Councilman Hache questioned whether Mr. Rooney was comfortable with the assumption that Walker was making. Mr. Rooney stated that he was comfortable, the only caveat being that in talking to the construction companies that presented the other night, they came up with some areas that he doesn’t think the Council thought about as far as costs. For example, having to wash the garage down several times a month during the winter season. He doesn’t know how that’s impacted here, so he hasn’t gotten into the nitty gritty of what these numbers are. So, from a high level he is comfortable, but he would have to push down further as to what some of the costs are to make sure.

Councilman Hache stated that the builders gave a safe assumption of the cost to maintain and range from $50 per space per year to $100 per space. He stated that perhaps, we might negotiate directly with them, and can be built into the construction things such as pitch or drainage, or perhaps a wheel wash that is weight sensitive. This would wash the tires as they came into the garage. He’s seen these systems that are not overly expensive and can protect the Village’s investment. Councilman Hache added that he knows the assumptions were made for a $12 million garage, and the 3% interest. Does it change much in terms of the assumption of the operating costs whether the garage is $12 million versus $11 million versus $10 million. Mr. Rooney stated only the utilities would change, and he didn’t think by much. Councilman Hache questioned whether it would change talking about a garage with 240 spaces with four levels, to which Mr. Rooney responded it should be close but there will still be electricity if there is one level less. Councilman Hache stated that assuming there are 4 levels, or 3 stories, the Village’s operating costs should not change whether it is $12 million versus $11 million versus $10 million. In theory, the Village will be paying for the aesthetics of a nicer looking structure. So, the Council could take the provided assumptions and calculate what the debt service would be at each of those constructions amounts and it looks like it would be a cost savings of $60,000 a year.

Councilman Hache stated that one of the things that he would like to look at a bit closer was one of the builders including some analysis in terms of short-term interest-only financing. If they can do interest-only for the first three years, for example in terms of debt service coverage ratio in 2020 at 1.38, that can go to almost 4 times, they go 3.96 and can bring that financing down assuming a conservative rate of around 2%. So, he thinks that’s something the Council should look at. It is not binding and they can go directly to the local banks, talk to them, and allow that to be the mechanism that the Village uses to build that early cushion. Maybe we don’t rely as much on the rate increases immediately, which he felt was something that was worthwhile to take a look.

Councilman Hache added that another thing he saw in the assumptions, the first line in the revenue is parking meter and RPP fees for 2019. Following what happens from 2017 to 2018 where the revenues go from $1,237,000 for $1,473,000 that’s consistent with increasing parking meter rates by 50% but only for 5 months out of the year. If it were 6 months, the Village would see a 25% increase in the revenue and here the Council is seeing about a 20% increase. Councilman Hache added that he didn’t follow what happens in 2019 that there is a drop off in the revenues from $1,473,000 to $1,399,000. Mayor Knudsen suggested it was because the Hudson Street lot would be closed and there would be no revenue stream. Mr. Rooney stated that he would check.

Councilman Hache stated that the Village was saying they would find a place for those commuters to park, so he didn’t think 15 spots reserved for shopping and dining would make that much of a dent. He added that another concern was when looking at the revenue assumption it assumes the Village meets terminal velocity after increasing to $1.50, but there is a constant increase of 3% every year of operating expenses. Would it be possible to assume that the Village try to build in a more gradual increase in the parking meter rate. It just doesn’t make any sense that the Village would have the revenue cap off but the expenses keep climbing so maybe that was something that Walker could look at in terms of the assumptions.

Councilman Hache stated that his other observation was that the supply and demand analysis on pages 4 and 5 tells a story of where the demand is when looking at both during the week and the weekends. There is a 94-95% occupancy in off street parking lots, 98% both during the week and Saturdays in the on street lots. Dayton Street is the exception, and he thought that was very telling. Just to clarify, it is better the sooner the Village can have this 3 year build up period before they bond and they start bonding not in 2020 but go to 2023 or late 2022. When were these assumptions assuming the garage would be built by, because when talking to the construction companies, the assumption is that the Village will not have anything before the second half of 2019. So, is it the assumption that the garage will be completed and bonded, adding that he sees that it starts accruing debt service in 2020, but how far into the year. Mr. Rooney stated that he thinks Walker was looking at the end of 2019 to have it constructed.

Councilman Hache stated that he had some concerns regarding safety with the garage particularly what happens after hours. Assuming 75% is allocated to commuters, there are some concerns as to what happens if people start parking there over night or mischievous people start pulling in there to party. Maybe, the Village can look into how feasible it would be to block off the garage to prohibit overnight activities or limit it to the first level where a quick visual read is possible, or close off the upper levels. He stated that maybe the contractors could give some suggestions as to how the Village could accomplish that.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she thought that the drop in 2019 appears to be a $75,000 +/- difference and she had to almost assume that was as a result of the parking lot actually being closed because that would be the 70 odd cars times the $1000 pass. She added that she had interest in knowing the value of a stall in the Hudson Street parking garage because when she looks at the numbers of increasing the meters she doesn’t know the break point. When do people just say they’re not paying because they could drive up the street and it would be free, or go to Westwood and pay zero. She was interested in understanding the value of a stall if somebody has access they buy a parking pass and they get 200 +/- square feet that they have access to every single day to commute. Is the value of that $750 or $1000 or $1500. To Councilman Voigt’s point, tweaking numbers means you find revenue streams elsewhere and not burdening the day to day visitors. Mayor Knudsen stated that she would be curious to know the value of one of those stalls.

Mayor Knudsen stated that going back to the 85% stress they are really talking about a small number of vehicles that gets to that stress factor. So, is that something that also just looking at other opportunities of on street parking, such as the boxes. There is opportunity there and would that release the stress factor as they are talking about a negligible number of vehicles. When thinking about it she would like to see if that’s resolved in another way. She added that in terms of going back to the out of town commuters, when she reads that line, the numbers have to be tweaked so that 50 out of town commuters reestablish themselves. She is interested in knowing what analysis was done to come to the conclusion that the system in the Village wouldn’t be able to fill the garage without having 50 out of town commuters come back in. So, where did that number come from, and is that absolutely necessary in order to do that. Mr. Rooney stated he believed that Walker used the 112 of nonresident parkers the Village had in the past saying that now there is going to be an interest for them to come back. It was an assumption they made, and surely the Village can make sure it’s not something that’s going to happen.

Mayor Knudsen stated she had an email today from someone who has a business downtown and received a ticket. They made a complaint that every time he turned around the people at a nearby store, run out when they know the PEO is in the vicinity and they drop the coins in the meter so they can essentially park for as long as they want and not pay anything. She stated that she sees it as theft of a service but nonetheless he pointed out that this happens every day and that the Village should do something to get the employees off the streets. She was shocked and wondered how that could be when there are all the employee parking spaces available. They have been availed of these opportunities at a discounted rate and nobody changed their behavior. So, when Councilwoman Walsh talks about behavior, Mayor Knudsen would like to understand better how this behavior changes. Reading the Walker Report and talking about people that are circling block after block after block even though there is parking 3 blocks away and what makes the Council think that behavior changes, and if that is the issue how then do you change that behavior. Mr. Rooney stated that possibly it is something Walker could deal with. Mayor Knudsen stated she would be interested in understanding how that behavior is changed. She does think if the Council is reviewing these documents and they keep seeing that the stress, that 85% factor is the tipping point, and that people still go around and around the block, what makes them decide to not go around the block again. Mr. Rooney stated that he would ask.

Councilman Hache stated that looking at increases from 50 cents an hour to 75 cents, $1.25, $1.50 where does that put the Village compared to places with comparable downtowns like Summit, Morristown, Montclair. Mr. Rooney stated that a lot of information can be pulled together, adding that back in 2015 Ridgewood was about the lowest of all municipalities that had train stations throughout the State. Now that Walker proposes a different rate, he would have to go back to look as he’s sure other rates have changed as well, but he can pull something together. Councilman Hache stated that Red Bank had similar downtown space, to which Mr. Rooney added Summit, Montclair, so a lot can be compared to and see where the Village is.

Mayor Knudsen stated going back to the terms of the value of that stall, whether or not there is a different approach to funding and whether or not there is a more hybrid approach to finding the money for this parking deck. Mr. Rooney stated ok. Mayor Knudsen thanked Mr. Rooney for his patience and waiting.

  1. DISCUSSION
  1. Ridgewood Water

 

  1. Award Professional Services – Water Rate Study

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this resolution was for awarding a professional services contract for a water related study. A contract was awarded to Howard J. Woods, Jr. to perform a water rate study for the years 2010 to 2012, and then that was extended to include the years 2013 through 2017. It is anticipated that Mr. Woods’ services will need to be expanded to include expert testimony from a specialist in water rate case matters and further analysis of such rate case data. The Village is looking to increase to an additional $30,000 for Mr. Woods.

Councilman Voigt questioned if Mr. Woods had completed 2017 yet, as he was sent 2013 through 2016. Mr. Rooney stated that he didn’t think Mr. Woods had done 2017 yet, because the data isn’t available yet.

  1. Award Professional Services – Design and Administration of Improvements at the Southside Reservoir

 

Ms. Mailander stated this resolution was regarding the award for the Southside Reservoir project which is located in Glen Rock. Proposals were received, and it is critical that these improvements be made by January 15, 2019 as per an Administrative Order of Consent by the USEPA. Non-compliance may subject the Village to penalties. There were three proposals received, and D.J. Egarian is the least expensive at $52,000, they are from Fairfield, New Jersey, and the funding is in the Ridgewood Water Capital Budget. Their proposal is half the price of the next highest bidder, and Ms. Mailander asked Mr. Calbi why that occurred, and he responded that they are a smaller firm and they know the Ridgewood Water system as they have done work for the Village successfully, so this is a good deal.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she had emailed this afternoon and gotten the same response, that they are a smaller firm with less overhead and they can provide this service for the Village.

  1. Award Second Year Contract – Supply and Maintain Cold Water Meters

 

Ms. Mailander stated this resolution was a notice of bid award for year two for cold water meters. Last year it was awarded for a two-year contract to Rio Supply out of Sticklerville, New Jersey. Last year the cost was $165,115 and this is for the second year which is $169,255. They were the sole bidder last year, and funding is in the Water Utility Operating Budget.

 

  1. Parking - None
  1. Budget

 

  1. Award Contract – Graydon Pool Concession – Refreshment Service

 

Ms. Mailander stated the next resolution was under budget for the Graydon Pool Concession Refreshment Service which is annually at the Graydon Pool Water’s Edge Café. The sole submission from Michael Sims of Mellsworth Foods in Ramsey, New Jersey, is the provider who has been there for several years. He has decided to exercise the previous year’s bid option for 2018 to offer it, as well. This gives the Village revenue of $9,300 for the season at Graydon and it is the same as 2017.

Councilman Hache questioned if he was the only bidder. Ms. Mailander responded that he was last year, they do a very good job, and Parks and Recreation is very happy with them. She added that there had been some concern trying to find healthier or cheaper priced options as individuals had asked the Village to provide. Mr. Sims seemed responsive to those requests.

 

  1. Award Contract – Coach Bus Transportation Services

 

Ms. Mailander stated this resolution was for H.I.L.T. trips for senior citizens. In the past, the Village has awarded to Vanderhoof Transportation. Unfortunately, there are major factors of concern with this provider including lateness; unreliability; various mechanical issues with the buses; unprofessionalism; and inferior customer relations. Ms. Mailander stated that although the bid for Vanderhoof is actually $880 less than the next lowest bid, which is Panorama Tours. The Recreation Department is recommending Panorama Tours at $9,260 for the year of 2018.

Mayor Knudsen questioned whether those issues that are being raised were documented. Ms. Mailander stated that as far as she knows yes, they did, and it was discussed with the company. So, this turns out to then be the lowest responsible bid.

 

  1. Schedler Property – Phase I and Phase II Archaeological Investigation RFP

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the next resolution was for the Phase I and Phase II Archaeological Investigation RFP for the Schedler property. Mayor Knudsen stated that all information that she provided was read, back when the ad-hoc committee was in the process of preparing or discussing plans for the property. A resident raised a question about the historic elements of the property and asked Mayor Knudsen to investigate. She did contact the State and had all the documents from Art Libel, who submitted all of the documentation for the Certificate of Eligibility. They went through every piece of the documents and in contacting the State; they clarified why the house met the criteria for an Historic Certificate of Eligibility and the property, in fact did not. What they are stating is that it would require an Archaeological Phase I investigation and then an Archaeological Phase II investigation. She added that it was also shared that even having any historic value wouldn’t mean that the property couldn’t have a sports field. What they like to do is simply document and that would allow the property to then become also eligible.

Mayor Knudsen added that reading the letter from the State says that there is a high probability that it will yield historic artifacts and meet the criteria. She stated she does not know the cost. She just put the information out there if the remainder of the Council had the opportunity to read the information, they could decide whether or not they want to pursue, or at least send out an RFP, and establish what the cost would be. Mayor Knudsen stated that when she spoke with the State the representative was heading from Trenton to Upstate New York and they stopped at the property and take a look at everything. She also was not concerned with the tree removal or any of the work that the Village was engaging in. She observed the trees that were marked and did not feel that would be a sufficient ground disturbance to compromise any historic value that might be there. So, this is something, if the Council is interested, it is not cost prohibitive, and answers some questions, they might want to send out an RFP and at least determine what the cost is.

Ms. Mailander added that she just found out today that this was done most recently in 2015. It wasn’t an actual RFP, but it was going out to ask how much this might cost, and the estimate was approximately $10,000. She added that the Village could certainly go out for the RFP and maybe it is the same, less, or more, but she wanted to mention it because this just came to light today as she had not known previously. Mayor Knudsen stated that she found that interesting and wondered whether it was for both Phase I and Phase II investigations. Ms. Mailander stated that Janet Fricke gave her that information. Ms. Fricke stated that it was for a Phase I investigation. Mayor Knudsen added that the letter states Phase I and Phase II would be required. Ms. Mailander stated that it was up to the Council if they would like to go out for an RFP to see what it would cost.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that when he read the report it said that after Phase I they could determine if you need to go on to Phase II or not because if they don’t find anything in Phase I then there is no reason to go an incur a greater cost by going into more detail with Phase II. He stated that he felt it was worth it to go out and see what the specific costs would be and then decide then if the Village wants to find out what’s in the ground.

Mayor Knudsen stated that it probably doesn’t hurt to at least establish an absolute price and send out for the RFP and then at least the Council will know what the cost is. She added that again it is the question as to whether or not both the house and the property meet the criteria for a Certificate of Eligibility. Just being mindful that on the Village’s Mater Plan Historic Element both the house and the property are listed. So, she doesn’t know what the cost is, but if everyone agrees they could go out for the RFP.

Councilman Hache stated that he was unable to read one of the pieces of paper, and Deputy Mayor Sedon agreed. Mayor Knudsen stated that she does have the original which is clear enough for her to read but maybe it was the way the file came in as a PDF, but what she will do is forward the originals from Joe Suplicki. HPC also felt this was the right direction to take with the property so it was endorsed by them. Ms. Mailander stated that she would move forward with having a RFP writer do that.

 

  1. Deferred School Tax for 2018

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this Resolution was for deferred school tax for 2018 which is an annual Resolution. It has to be approved annually by the Council and will allow for the maximum deferral which is the most favorable position to take as it will increase the Village fund balance and will help offset any restrictions from reserve accounts which may arise in 2017 financial operations. Ms. Mailander stated that this can always be amended as the Budget goes along if the Council feels that they want to change that number.

 

  1. Correction to Resolution #17-111 – Award Contract – Portable Fuel Cell Trailer

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this was for a correction to Resolution #17-111 which was adopted in April 2017 and was for a portable fuel cell trailer. This resolution contained an incorrect purchase quote. The amount not to exceed in the resolution was $5,478 and unfortunately it should have been $5,748. So, the Council has to redo the resolution to have it be accurate. It is really just correcting the original Resolution and it just came to light.

 

  1. Award Contract – Tub Grinder

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the next resolution was for the tub grinder, the Village accepted proposals. Three bid specifications were picked up with two bids being received. The low bidder was W.E. Timmerman of White House, New Jersey. The recommendation is to award the contract for $365,580 which is below the estimated amount for this piece of equipment at $380,000.

Deputy Mayor Sedon questioned if this was to replace the tub grinder that the Village currently has which is old and broken down. Ms. Mailander stated that was correct. Deputy Mayor Sedon stated he believed the Village was partners with Glen Rock on that equipment, which Ms. Mailander stated was correct. Deputy Mayor Sedon questioned if the Village was going at it alone right now with the tub grinder. Ms. Mailander stated that she would have Mr. Calbi come up and discuss that.

Mr. Calbi stated that it was something that he had discussed as part of a contract that the Village has with Glen Rock, and he forwarded a copy of the contract to Ms. Mailander to share. He stated that there may be options with Glen Rock to take the current one or share the new one, but those discussions haven’t started yet for the Village.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that it was something like 1/3 and 2/3 on the last agreement between Ridgewood and Glen Rock, so he guessed on this if they were interested in continuing the shared service, then potentially the cost could go down by 1/3. Glen Rock also paid for parts and maintenance annually. Deputy Mayor Sedon questioned if Mr. Calbi had any idea when he would know if Glen Rock was interested in the shared service. Mr. Calbi deferred to Ms. Mailander, who stated that it should be shortly as the Council would need to know by next week and if not then definitely in time for the April Council meeting.

Mayor Knudsen questioned that if the Village was sharing the tub grinder, how much of the life span is reduced by that added use. Is there an understanding of spending “x” amount of dollars are we shortening the lifespan of something by having this shared service. She questioned when the first tub grinder was purchased, adding that she didn’t think it was that old. There was some indecipherable discussion. Mayor Knudsen questioned whether the useful time of that tub grinder, which was possibly from 2006 to 2018, because it has been down for quite some time, is actually shorter because of the shared services. Would it be better to just go it alone and this way the Village has longer use of it because this way Ridgewood might actually be paying more. She questioned whether there was any way to do any analysis on it. Mr. Calbi stated that was a good point. Ms. Mailander stated that hopefully there will be more information to bring back for next week’s meeting.

 

  1. Policy

 

  1. Approval of Schedler Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations

 

Ms. Mailander stated as the Council would remember there was a presentation back in December and it was about the recommendations from the Ad Hoc committee where they proposed two different scenarios for the field, a playground, a parking lot, and the way it was being laid out. She stated that the former Village Council put their intentions to paper in a resolution indicating they wanted a 90-foot field and she thought that before proceeding with any of these plans this Council should have a resolution indicating what it is that they’re agreeing to. So, the Village knows for funding and what is intended with that property.

Mayor Knudsen stated that in terms of the cost, a cost analysis could be done before anything else is done. Ms. Mailander stated that this would be discussed Friday with Parks and Recreation, as they do have a soft estimate based on what is proposed. She added that again, people at the time said thank you for preparing this and thanks to the Schedler Ad-Hoc Committee. She thinks the whole Council was in agreement, but she feels that she would be more comfortable moving forward once the Village has these costs and for the Council to say this is the direction it wants to go through in a resolution so it is on the record that they all agree and are moving forward in that direction. Ms. Mailander stated that this would be discussed further at the budget meeting this Friday and then possibly bring it back next week or approve a resolution in the budget meeting for March 14th.

Mayor Knudsen questioned whether the Village ever established whether it needs DOT approval since that’s a steep hill. It needed a lot of fill to increase the elevation of the interior part of that property, which is currently a catch basin for water. Is that going to be a problem because of Route 17, and was there ever any analysis done as to what kind of flooding might take place. Ms. Mailander stated that she would check with Mr. Rutishauser.

 

  1. Operations

 

  1. Purchasing Process

 

Ms. Mailander stated that Deputy Mayor Sedon asked if this could be put on the agenda, and herself and Mr. Rooney met with some concerned residents and discussed the process with them and indicated that they were open to suggestions. Mr. Rooney, in fact, stated that if they had any concerns, they could reach out directly to him and he would address them in the future. Ms. Mailander stated that the Council had the purchasing presentation from Mr. Rooney, and she asked if there were additional questions or suggestions from the Council as to how they may want the Village’s purchasing process to be amended.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that he wanted to see if there was a willingness to look into the Village of Ridgewood purchasing policy, because obviously there is nothing the Council can do about the State regulation. He wondered if there were any suggestions from staff who deal with this on a daily basis. Could it be streamlined or become more transparent. Is there any room for adjustments or any type of changes that would make sense and help the process along.

Ms. Mailander stated that she would ask Mr. Rooney to come up and discuss it. She added that, as mentioned to the residents, the Village is controlled by the State of New Jersey and the Village has regulations it has to follow for purchasing. New Jersey has some of the tightest purchasing requirements in the Nation, so the Village is regulated, but there may be some suggestions just as the residents that she met with had a few. She said they could possibly be implemented but she wanted Council to give their input, as well.

Mr. Rooney stated that when he first came on board, there was a purchasing manual dating from 2006. So, he took that manual and massaged it and incorporated a lot of what other municipalities in the area do as a sort of best practices. So, that is how the Village got to where it is today. That does not mean that the manual is perfect and there are often times when he consults with the QPA, just to review processes to make sure that the Village is complying with the law and its own policies. Mr. Rooney stated he was open to suggestions and anyone that has recommendations, concerns, or questions obviously can come to him. What he tries to do every year when the Village has the audit done, he works with Nisivoccia to see if the auditors have any suggestions on things the Village may have done. So, they spend a lot of time going through the bidding process and how requisitions go through the system.

Mr. Rooney stated that the Village has been pretty good, as far as compliance and haven’t had any comments or recommendations but is it something that he tries to look at all the time. He does solicit feedback from the Department heads as to whether or not they have any suggestions. So, it is a moving target and they try to do what they can to make certain that they take care of the compliance with the law.

Ms. Mailander added one thing was recommended by the residents. When she and Mr. Rooney met with them, the Department Directors had already been informed that they would implement process to go out for written quotes. It will be done via email and sent to the people who they know. It’s usually vendors the Village knows that do this type of work, and do it all at the same time. Instead of calling someone today and then someone else a week from now, and another ten days from then, this way they all get the same information at the same time and return it by a certain date and time. That has already been implemented and the Department Directors have been advised that is how the Village wants to proceed. She wanted to thank Mr. Rooney and the residents that met with her because that was one of their suggestions. They are already in the process of implementing this procedure.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that was where he was going with at least one suggestion. He knows that sometimes things come in via text message or off a website, and it didn’t seem as good as sending out an email to everyone and then having it timestamped. It goes out the same time and then comes the same time. Ms. Mailander stated that was the other part of it. The Village will not accept a quote by text, it will have to be in an email. Mr. Rooney stated that if there is a non-response, the Village will make another call or inquiry to cover the three minimums the Village has.

Ms. Mailander stated that currently, if the Village goes out for three quotes and one comes back that they don’t want to quote on this, that is actually new in the State of New Jersey that this is allowed to be a quote. The Village instead will ask the Department Directors to go out for a fourth quote and hopefully get a third actual quote.

Mayor Knudsen asked if there was anything that limits the Village to three quotes or if there is an opportunity to expand the pool of possible vendors. She was thinking when someone says they are not going to bid, then that actually takes more time. What happens in that instance is one bidder said they were not interested and two bidders submitted their bid. Or maybe two submit and then maybe somebody calls and says they want to submit a bid but then two have already submitted their bid. The other scenario actually, by expanding the pool of possible vendors, makes it a little more even that everybody is submitting at the same date and same time.

Mayor Knudsen stated that another thing she thought was brilliant was when Mr. Calbi did the grid across the resolution. So, when the Council sees the grid they see that Companies X, Y, and Z. This is how much this person bid and she thinks its so helpful. Even today she emailed her questions comparing apples to apples, and then what the difference was. She stated that it was helpful for any Councilmember to see what those differentials are, too.

Mayor Knudsen thanked Mr. Rooney and the residents who were helpful in reviewing the purchasing process.

  1. Major Soil Permits – The Enclave and Ken Smith II Projects

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the next resolution was regarding two major soil permits, one was for The Enclave which is the former Sealfons Building, and they have applied for a major soil moving permit. The project received Planning Board approval on February 6th of this year and the Village needs a resolution to approve it. She added that obviously the route will be coordinated with the Village Police Department and the Village Engineer, and they intend to remove approximately 4,116 cubic yards of material from this site.

The second is KS Broad which is a Ken Smith Property. They also applied for a major soil permit and received Planning Board approval also on February 6th. Again, the construction routes will be carefully coordinated with the Police Department and the Village Engineer, and they are looking to move approximately 4,342 cubic yards of material.

Ms. Mailander stated that both of them will require resolutions of approval, they need escrow, specific hours during which time they can do the work, not on East Ridgewood Avenue and certain other restrictions.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she had a couple of questions, but Mr. Rutishauser wasn’t present, so she would go on record with the questions. She wondered if the Holmstead School was not a designated school zone, as she thought it said school zone, at the corner of Hope and Ridgewood Avenue. Ms. Mailander stated that she would have to find out. Mayor Knudsen stated that it wasn’t noted on the paperwork, but she thought there were a couple of other schools that may have been designated school zones in that vicinity, but they are not necessarily Village public schools.

Mayor Knudsen stated that her other question was on how many trucks there would be. Ms. Mailander stated that she could find out. Mr. Rogers estimated that a truck could hold about 13 cubic yards, there was some discussion, and this was estimated at 660. Mayor Knudsen stated that her next question was that there is written on both of these permits that no trucking shall be permitted within the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:30 P.M. full or empty in any of the Village’s designated school zones. Then it indicated East Ridgewood Avenue by the high school. Presumably that is based on the likelihood that there are students and pedestrian activity. The high school is an open campus and she was concerned because she didn’t know how to address that when there are 600 some-odd trucks going back and forth.

Ms. Mailander stated that this would be over many days. Buses go up and down East Ridgewood Avenue everyday and there is an open campus. Trucks do as well. So, yes there will be additional trucks but it’s not as if there will be 600 trucks in a week, but rather over months.

Mr. Rogers stated that in the last discussion when the Council was talking about Dayton’s soil removal permit, they talked about the fact that depending upon how the system seemed to run with the restrictions and conditions of the soil removal permit, they can be changed so that it can be adjusted if it looks like problems are beginning.

 

  1. Declare Property Surplus – John Deere 544 H Loader – Streets Department

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this resolution was for declaring surplus of a John Deere Loader from the Streets Department which has been out of service for two years and has been traded in for the purchase of another vehicle.

 

  1. Declare Property Surplus – Ford F250 – Parks Department

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this resolution was for declaring surplus of a Ford F-250 from the Parks Department which doesn’t start or function and actually the repair estimate is far greater than the value of the vehicle. It is a 2004 with 124,433 miles on it.

 

  1. Replacement of Tree at Graydon – Report by Shade Tree Commission

 

Ms. Mailander stated that Deputy Mayor Sedon would be presenting a report from the Shade Tree Commission on the replacement of the sycamore tree that has been removed at Graydon Pool.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that the Shade Tree Commission received a recommendation from Wayne Cahilly who performed the second study on the tree and sonared it with the tomograph. That suggestion was to plant a grove of 5 to 7 black tupelos. They heard from Jeanne Epiphan, who is an ecologist and a volunteer with Ridgewood Wildscape, suggested planting a sycamore that would live there for 100 or so years. Why not just plant another sycamore when it has been proven to handle the conditions. He added someone else says they wouldn’t recommend planting the same tree in the same spot because of bacteria and diseases from the previous tree might move into the new tree.

With all of these expert opinions, the Shade Tree Commission has decided to reach out through email and just run one opinion by another opinion and sort it all out. Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that the Shade Tree Commission would reach out to all of the experts who made different suggestions and try to pull them together and come back hopefully in the beginning of March with a presentation on what to replace the sycamore tree with and when.

Mayor Knudsen added that Ms. Epiphan stated that a grove of black tupelos was a concern for lifeguard visibility and that was the other point that she noted in her email. Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that it would be a line of sight issue, but anything that is planted there at some point is going to grow. So, at some point in a couple of years there is going to be a line of sight issue because the tree is going to be so tall and have a crown and when it is in full bloom a lifeguard from across the pool may not be able to see the corner. There is also a lifeguard chair that is right by that corner, so they would have to see how that would work with Parks and Recreation as well. He added that the Commission and members were pulling everything together and would probably have something for the beginning of March.

 

  1. MANAGER’S REPORT

 

Budget Hearings - Ms. Mailander reported that the Budget Hearings would be held on March 2nd, March 9th, and March 16th beginning at 5:30 P.M. and then the final one is on Wednesday, March 21st. She added that the meetings would be televised and certainly the public is welcome to come and attend the meetings in person.

Hudson Street Parking Garage Update Ms. Mailander stated that on February 21st the Village Council will interview four companies who submitted their proposals. Each concept plan was reviewed for design and adherence to the requirements posted in the RFP.

Super Science Saturday Ms. Mailander stated that Saturday, March 3rd was the 30th Super Science Saturday which is a free family event that will take place in the Ridgewood High School Campus Center from 9:00 A.M. to 1:30 P.M. adding that it was a wonderful day and she would encourage anyone who is interested in science to go. There will be interactive exhibits from Liberty Science Center, a Great Paper Airplane Contest, a 30-foot egg drop challenge, an indoor and outdoor drone racing and a live rocket launch.

 

  1. COUNCIL REPORTS

 

Planning Board Councilman Voigt stated that the Planning Board met on February 20th and there was an informal review of a major subdivision which is across from The Stable at 232 and 250 North Maple which is approximately 3.5 acres of land. They were looking to develop a cul-de-sac and eight new homes on this lot, and they would demolish the two larger homes that are on the existing lots. There was a total of 14 variances that were included in this particular subdivision, and there may also be an issue with affordable housing. Mr. Rogers stated that if it remains at eight new homes it will generate an affordable housing need that they will have to deal with.

Councilman Voigt stated there were a number of concerns regarding the number of variances, as well as the number of homes. Suggestions from the Planning Board were to make this a six to seven home cul de sac, but again this is an informal review and feedback was given.

There was also a minor subdivision review at 174 Emsley Court, off of North Murray, and it is actually a subdivision that was previously subdivided then combined and re-subdividing it and that request was granted unanimously.

Mayor Knudsen added that one of the big issues with the major subdivision was the cul de sac that was presented was exceptionally narrow and they wanted the Village to approve their cul de sac with only one side of the street parking and would want it to be restricted on the other side. The Planning Board was very concerned because it is not necessarily a deep cul de sac and they could see the spillage for parking could potentially cause problems as the overflow went into other neighborhoods. That was a big stumbling block and it included a variance with it as well.

Library Board of Trustees Councilman Voigt stated that the Library Board of Trustees met February 27th and there were a few issues related to the Pease Library. There are two tenants in the library and it looks like the tenant in the upstairs portion will renew their lease for the next three or six years, that particular tenant is the Ridgewood Medical Media.

The upcoming event taking place on Wednesday, April 25th is the Friends of the Library Annual Author Luncheon at Seasons in Washington Township. The author is Nicole Krause who wrote Dark Forest, and tickets go on sale on March 6th. There is a book signing and a silent auction, as well and these events typically sell out fast.

 

Shade Tree CommissionDeputy Mayor Sedon stated that on April 10th at 7:30 P.M. Wayne Cahilly will be appearing at the Library as a speaker for the Shade Tree Commission. He is the expert who came and diagnosed the sycamore tree at Graydon Pool. He is also an expert witness following an incident in Central Park where an elm tree fell and injured some people. He was pulled in to do the forensic study of the tree and the injuries. He is very accomplished and will be a great speaker for anyone interested in trees or tree related topics.

Ridgewood Environmental Action CommitteeDeputy Mayor Sedon stated that REAC would be having a discussion and a video shown on April 19th at the library at 7:00 P.M., the New Jersey Highlands video and a presentation to talk about the New Jersey Highlands.

Community Center Advisory BoardDeputy Mayor Sedon stated that Don Lieberman was here at the beginning of the Council meeting and spoke about the good work that the Community Center Advisory Board was doing and the Board is looking into buying some new tables for the Anne Zusy Youth Center and the Patrick Mancuso Senior Center downstairs of Village Hall and as it is probably going to turn into an annual event. There will be an end of the year resolution for gifts that the Foundation has raised funds for and purchased and given to the Village of Ridgewood. These will be officially donated every year as they are items purchased and added to the Community Center. So, he wanted to thank everyone for their good work on that committee.

 

Ridgewood Arts CouncilCouncilwoman Walsh stated that even though during March the Ridgewood Arts Council was not having an artist event they would like to remind everyone that at the Ed Center they are going to have all student artwork, which is done every year.

She added that the only other question she had was going back to the grant writing. They have not received anything from Millennium Strategies related to art grants that they are eligible for and so they were curious as to the frequency that they would hear. Ms. Mailander stated that any grants that come up she sends them to a Councilmember that would benefit relevant to a Board or Committee. She added that Millennium Strategies are aware that the Arts Council is looking for grants so anything that she receives will go to Councilwoman Walsh.

School Resource Officer Councilman Hache stated that he met with the Board of Education last Friday, and ever since the unfortunate events that took place in Florida, a lot of parents have called and written expressing their concerns about the security in Ridgewood schools. Councilman Hache and Mayor Knudsen attend a meeting with the Board of Education on a monthly basis and this time around they asked that Chief Luthcke join in the discussion, as well. Usually the Village Manager participates, too. Councilman Hache stated that he spent a good part of the last year and a half trying to convince the Board of Education to help the Council bring the School Resource Officer (SRO) to the schools, but somehow it hasn’t gotten there yet. He added that unfortunately, they saw how vulnerable, particularly the high school is, yesterday when there were two people who did not attend the school, were on campus and were luckily unarmed.

Councilman Hache stated that it is important to get an SRO as soon as possible, and some of the estimates they have gotten so far are approximately January 2019 and he thinks that is about ten months too late. He added that everyone present should consider trying to work on how to get an SRO quicker than that.

Mayor Knudsen stated that the Village Manager and herself had a number of communications pertaining to the SRO and have discovered there is not actually required training, but there is a five day, 40 hour class training for an SRO which is sensitivity training. When going into a school environment there are confidentiality issues and special needs issues and they need to be sensitive to individuals with different needs. They are also looking at how quickly they can put a more seasoned Police Officer in as soon as possible, even on a temporary rotating basis, to have police presence. We believe whenever there is a community Police Officer or SRO present, it builds trust and confidence with the kids and they share more information as they become more familiar with the Police Officers and Police Department.

Mayor Knudsen added that they are aggressively working on that and hope to bring it to some conclusion by the end of the week, but she will be working with the Chief to get that taken care of. The Council shares the concerns of the parents, and are either parents or have been parents, so they share the concern of student safety and well-being and take it so seriously.

Super Science SaturdayMayor Knudsen stated that the Ridgewood High School 30th Super Science Saturday is on March 3rd and she just wanted to thank the crew for inviting her to a pasta dinner. She did have the opportunity to present them with a resolution acknowledging their 30 years. Greg, Michael, Aaron and Mel did a terrific job and are so committed and started doing this when they were kids in high school because it was going to be discontinued. So, they took it upon themselves to make certain that every student in the Village had Super Science Saturday every year and that it was not forgotten. The Village owes them a debt of gratitude for continuing their work, and, also, Michael Aaron Flicker is going to be recognized as a Distinguished Ridgewood High School Alumni. She thanked all of those fine young people.

Sign Ordinances Mayor Knudsen stated that she and Councilman Hache met with Village Planner, Bridget Bogart. They should have been joined by Bill Gilsenan, but he couldn’t make it. They started updating the Village CBD sign ordinances, and are excited about that and looking at how they can give businesses tools to be more successful and visible to pedestrians and vehicles. She stated that there will probably be some changes to the sign ordinances and she is hoping to have them on the next agenda. Mayor Knudsen added that Ms. Bogart is working on the Blade Ordinance piece of it and after it goes before the Council it would go to the Planning Board for comment, then Historic Preservation for comment and back to the Council, but they are working very aggressively to have it taken care of.

Planning Board Master Plan Subcommittee Mayor Knudsen stated that the Planning Board Master Plan Subcommittee would be making recommendations to the Planning Board on the visioning process next week. Once again, that will come back to the Village Council to vote on because the Council is funding it. A letter will be sent making those recommendations back to the Council.

Ridgewood Cambodia Project Mayor Knudsen stated that the Ridgewood Cambodia Project event is March 8th from 6:30 P.M. to 8:30 P.M. at the Library and the flyer will be posted downstairs at Village Hall and online.

Socks for Soldiers Mayor Knudsen stated that two of Ridgewood’s Senators, Senator Corrado and Senator Bateman have partnered to launch a new Socks for Soldiers Donative Drive. Donations of clean, unworn socks are among the most requested items by our troops all across the world and especially our veterans at home. Socks for Soldiers was first launched when Kristin Corrado was a County Clerk and they collected more than 6,000 pairs of socks and were distributed to many grateful soldiers, veterans and homeless veterans. She asked everyone to stop by the box in the entry way to the lobby at Village Hall with new, unworn socks to keep them warm and cozy. We owe a debt of gratitude to all of those serving our nation and residents can all provide some nice socks.

 

  1. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Mayor Knudsen opened the meeting for Public Comment and stated that it was not to exceed five minutes per person.

Michelle Italia, 3 Betty Court, stated that she was commenting on some things that came up in her mind this evening in reference to the Schedler property. She said that the plan of the Schedler property was mentioned in the Master Plan originally that this was a parcel of land which was deemed historic in nature and she is assuming that is correct. Mayor Knudsen stated that was identified in the Master Plan Historic Elements. Ms. Italia stated that her biggest problem turns out to be now that many people in that particular section of Ridgewood were not aware of the fact that it was. So, that leads to another issue which is whether or not the Village can proceed because they think that the land is historic. There have been Bergen Community College students who have researched the aspect of having some areas which could be deemed as being historical and there have been attempts to place something else on that property. Ms. Italia questioned why it was that many of the residents weren’t aware of that information, as she thinks the whole town might feel differently and wouldn’t have such a negative attitude towards preserving that area.

Ms. Italia also stated she went along with Phase I and cutting the trees and removing it to make the land supposedly better, but now she is a little upset. How can the Village proceed when they should have gone to that historical aspect of the land first before proceeding to do anything else. Now, this Committee that has been established which she participated in and a compromise was reached regarding a field in that area. She cannot believe that all of those members that attended that meeting were aware that the land was designated for that and that the Village did not follow through with it. She added she is not blaming the Council, but rather the events of this process that has taken too long which she believes has been very confusing and slow. Ms. Italia stated that this should have been done two years ago, adding that even now the roof on the house and these trucks have come and disturbed the land, and placed mulch all over it. She knows that the Council said that they could still identify it and it wouldn’t be for Phase I and Phase II, but still that she thinks the house has been impacted because they were huge trucks that were driving into the area near the house.

Ms. Italia stated that she doesn’t know if she was a member of the group now that asked for a 75-foot field, she was not for it and she will discuss that with her group.

Bill McCandless, 71 Ridge Road, thanked the Council for providing documents ahead of tonight’s meeting and added that he hopes it is a trend that can continue as transparency builds trust and he thinks it’s important to talk a lot about those aspects.

Mr. McCandless stated that the Walker analysis was deeply flawed from the 2015 count and analysis that was done originally and they cite that overall again and again. He stated that he trusts everyone on the Council has read the 2015 Walker Report, if not they need to go through it again. He stated it was available on the website and the main Hudson Street page and he would encourage the Council to take a good look at several of these pages. Mr. McCandless stated that the facts were very clear, and he felt very strongly about the facts that are presented and it is used as a touchstone now as a reference point, and residents are comfortable with parts and uncomfortable with others and are okay with it.

Mr. McCandless stated that page 15 of Walker is Daytime Weekday Parking Demand, there are monster openings throughout the Village and there are multiple lots marked well under 85% capacity. On page 16 Weekday Evening Parking Demand, shows open parking at Walkers count throughout the entire Village with no deficit and it is represented in color where there is parking Monday through Friday. He asked that the Council please take a look at both of those when they could and then encourage the Council to move to page 19. He stated this was where it gets very interesting, as you start to move from West to East beginning at the train lot. It is marked yellow as under capacity. Cottage Place is actually marked green, as empty. On weekend nights there is an empty parking lot. Walker on this page right at the bottom of the page stated large surpluses exist in the Village. This isn’t an interpretation but unbiased data that is quite clear and right there. The Village has paid for it twice and he is not sure what the Council is looking at when anyone can claim there is a deficit. Mr. McCandless stated there is none, and the Village has paid these people who have been deemed experts and they told the Village there are large surpluses.

He added that diving into the data and looking at the numbers is also quite evident and pointed the Council to the Appendix. Mr. McCandless stated that the Appendix charts are fascinating because the analysis does not use all of the data available to it. It looks only at a six-block area, with 800 feet on one end, 1500 feet on another to create a square. In Weekday Existing Conditions Public, 57% of the Village parking is occupied showing that the Village has adequacy that is well beyond industry and town standards. He added that on the weekends when there is allegedly no parking, there is more parking available when the Village was planning to build 194 spaces that were already paid for, versus 160. Its time to stop, the parking is there, he doesn’t know what the Council is doing or why they are doing it but this garage is unnecessary and unneeded and an expense that the Village cannot afford and do not need. Mr. McCandless stated that there are perverse parking incentives in the town around pricing, it needs to stop now.

Jaqueline Hone, 30 Carriage Lane, stated that she wanted to speak about the Schedler property to reiterate what Ms. Italia was trying to explain. The Master Plan did identify the Schedler House and parcel as historical but that was way back before the Village every purchased the parcel. In 2013, the HPC identified it as well, and proceeded with the eligibility of both the house and the parcel. In 2015, the Village Manager stated that quotes were obtained for an archaeological investigation, and in 2016 Bergen County puts the Village of Ridgewood on notice saying that there are historical elements and they believe that the Village will do their due diligence and fiduciary obligation to proceed with the historic preservation. Ms. Hone stated that in November of 2017, the State representative visited the site and also says to go ahead and proceed. So, why are we now almost at March 2018 and this is the first that the Village residents are hearing of the findings of a State representatives visit and the archaeological quotes that were received in 2015. More importantly, why are we in 2018 and absolutely nothing has been done in regard to the historic registration of both the land and the house.

Ms. Hone stated that she has repeatedly heard that the Village of Ridgewood has eligibility but eligibility is very different than actually moving forward with the registration. For the last five to six years residents have repeatedly attended Historic Preservation meetings and these Village Council meetings saying that they wanted to proceed with that and had a ton of questions regarding the historic preservation of both the house and the land and were told that the historic preservation would proceed. She stated that the now there is a Village Manager who is pressuring the Council to move ahead with the recommendation of the ad-hoc committee which includes a 75-foot field over an archaeological site that has already been deemed with historical elements.

Ms. Hone stated that her question is how many more times is the Council going to speak about the historical elements within the land and the house and the eligibility and nothing will be done as far as the registration. She would desperately ask that the Council to give the residents a timeline, a date when this would happen, before the actual moving forward with any plan. The ad-hoc committee recommendation is flawed, as Ms. Italia pointed out, the committee had no idea and never represented to its members that the land was also historical. It was a very small group that attended the meeting where the determination was made and how they came to the conclusion of their plan. She believes it was a group of about 20 people. It was not publicly informed to the members and the people that were invested in the development of Schedler. It was a notice that went out to a very small select group that attended the meeting at Menishe’s house to give input on what they wanted the ad-hoc committee to present to the Council. She thinks that is flawed and a mistake and there are enough errors to say that that recommendation has to be reviewed, especially since that recommendation was only for a field and we all know that there were people who have stood here hour after hour in many public meetings stating they wanted historical, passive and preservation.

Ms. Hone stated that she asked that the Council move forward and do the fiduciary obligation and not put the cart in front of the horse, find out the historical elements first, move forward with the registration as identified back in early 2000 and hold off on any more plans to put anything on top of that archaeological site.

Patricia Infantino, 6 Betty Court, stated that regarding Schedler she hoped that the house could be named after Isabella Altano when the Village has it preserved.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that during the discussion of the Walker Study tonight there was some mention made of Walker’s recommendation to increase the parking rates. He stated that Councilman Hache asked Bob Rooney to take a look and see what other towns with train stations were doing in terms of how the new rate would compare to the other towns. He added that what was not discussed is also the Walker Report indicated a recommendation to increase the time from 6:00 P.M. until 8:00 P.M. That was also part of the recommendation so he would ask if Mr. Rooney is doing an analysis to show what some of the other municipalities with train stations are doing and how our new rate can compare to those rates. He should also check and see what times were in some of those other towns.

Mr. Loving stated that he took a quick look and there were some towns that went to 6:00 P.M., some that go to 8:00 P.M., some that go to 7:00 P.M. but it would be nice to have all of that on paper. The report could include the name of the municipality that is near the train station, what the hours of the meters in effect are, and what the current rates of the meters are, so that the Council can compare apples to apples. He stated that what upset him most when he read through both of the studies is that it talks about the parking system, not the parking utility, and it talks about the parking system being self-supporting. What the report fails to mention is that all of the utility money now is not spent on parking. A good portion of that money goes into the General Fund and is used for other purposes in Ridgewood. Nowhere in this study did he see how much of that revenue has to be used now to support the parking system. Is 100% of the revenue going forward going to be needed to support the parking system. If that’s the case, that means that there are some things that the parking utility money is funding now that need to be funded by another source. What concerns him, is the source going to be property tax revenue unless some services will be cut that money is currently funding.

Mr. Loving stated that another analysis that needs to be done is what percentage of the parking utility money is now going into the General Fund and what portion of that money is not going to be able to go into the fund in the future. What is the Village funding that it can no longer fund or that the Village is going to have to create some alternate source of revenue for. He stated that when the report is being tweaked, it would be nice to know that. His concern is the money that is now going to the General Fund will no longer go there and then that means it’s going to come out of property tax revenue. Property taxes are going to have to be increased, or the parking rates will have to be increased, and even more or services are going to have to be cut. He asked that the Council take a look at that along with the time that the parking has to be extended to and how it compares to some others.

Saurabh Dani, 390 Bedford Road, stated that he wanted to thank the Village Council, Ms. Mailander, Mr. Rooney for listening and acting on the purchasing process.

Mayor Knudsen stated that the Council would get the information for Mr. Loving and be precise about that. She also stated that the properties identified in the Master Plan Historic Element, when the application was submitted and she thinks that Ms. Hone would have these documents. If not, she would send them to her, but nothing can be registered on the State listing without a certificate of eligibility the only piece of that parcel that has a certificate of eligibility is the house. No the land did not qualify for the certificate of eligibility based on lacking information pertaining specifically to the Phase I and Phase II archaeological investigation so there is nothing that the Council can do to accelerate that because it simply does not have a certificate of eligibility. That’s not something she or anyone here decided. It is something that the State decided and she thought that was pretty clear in the documents. Mayor Knudsen stated that because of these inquires she did contact the State and asked them specifically what was required and necessary to advance that to get a certificate of eligibility and they told her what it was and the Council is here attempting to do it. She stated that she has to say that this five member Council has been actively engaged in historic preservation and they continue to make every effort to ensure that our history is there for future generations; they want to be not only in the crosshairs of people who oppose this and say don’t spend this money but then to be in the crosshairs of the people who support historic preservation and the Council thinks they are doing the right thing. The State indicated that the removal of the trees was not enough significant ground disturbance to compromise any historical artifact that might be present. They were comfortable with their finding and that was the reason that the State representative stopped there in November. She wanted everyone to know that the Council is actively engaged in historic preservation and there were reasons that the property cannot advance to the State list.

John Paquin, former Ridgewood Resident, 110 Ridgewood Road, Washington Township, stated that he was late to the Zabriskie-Schedler debate but he has seen an awful lot of effort by wonderful people over many years. He applauds all of that effort and he sees a lot of people really trying to preserve that slice of history. He stated that he was just reading one of the documents provided that said written descriptions of historic houses don’t serve the purpose for reminding us of our past, and they really don’t. If you stand at Zabriskie-Schedler and you look across to the church the wonderful thing is you can imagine the town that was there, the center that was there, and that was Ridgewood. People do not realize that the history of Paramus is the history of Ridgewood. What people called Paramus was actually the town of Ridgewood. He added that the Council has talked about the history and the battles and all that has gone on there. He also sees a house that’s really threatened and in real danger right now, and his concern is that there may be nothing to preserve. Mr. Paquin stated that he didn’t want to point fingers but it is a wonderful piece of history that has been there all our lives and witnessed so much history. It seems like it is really at risk and he would think it a shame if in a year’s time it’s said that the house was too far gone. That’s his fear.

Mayor Knudsen stated that again the historic architect is extremely confident that the house can and will be saved. Her plans are intact, her pricing is in place and she is ready to move forward. The Village is doing matching grants and are very confident that it will be able to save the house, and she just wanted to point out that Mr. Paquin has amazing renderings and they are fabulous, beautiful and it does appear that back in the day all roads led to the Church.

 

  1. RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

 

Deputy Village Clerk, Donna Jackson read Resolution #18-74 to go into Closed Session as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilwoman Walsh, seconded by Deputy Mayor Sedon, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Work Session was adjourned at 11:31 P.M.

______________________________

                                                                                                     Susan Knudsen                            

Mayor                        

______________________________

              Donna M. Jackson

           Deputy Village Clerk

  • Hits: 2566

20180606 Village Council Work Session

A REGULAR WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOD, NEW JERSEY ON JUNE 6, 2018 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

  1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG    SALUTE

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 7:32 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call the following were present: Councilman Hache, Deputy Mayor Sedon, Councilman Voigt, Councilwoman Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen. Also present were Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; and Donna Jackson, Deputy Village Clerk.

Mayor Knudsen led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag as well as in a Moment of Silence to honor the men and women serving our nation and all our first responders.

  1. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Jane Shinozuka, 825 Norgate Drive, stated that she was on the town website today and she was glad to now see that each of the Boards are listed separately. There has been one Community Relations Board Meeting she has been to since she was appointed, and it has been talked about at Citizen Safety, they have talked about streamlining the process so minutes will be taken for each board. Is there going to be a repository online where those interested in that board will be able to look up the minutes. Or is that there and she’s not seeing it. Ms. Shinozuka was wondering if that was still in the works. Mayor Knudsen stated that the Village Council would respond to her comments at the end of Public Comment.

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that Graydon Pool opened on Saturday and it was great to have it open again, and stated that everything was going well. She thanked the Council for getting the pool up and running as she understood there were some last minute issues with the water and Ms. Mailander got it done. Ms. Loving stated that she noticed on the Avenue that every tree well has flowers in it. She thinks in the past, individual store owners have put their own flowers in the tree wells and it now looks great. She wrote to Deputy Mayor Sedon who mentioned that he thinks it was Project Pride that was responsible, but it really looks nice and she wanted to thank whoever was responsible for that.

Jane Shinozuka, 825 Norgate Drive, added that she had seen the agenda and online that the Village Council was discussing different kinds of public space issues in town tonight. She wanted to say on behalf of the other side of Route 17, that North Road Park is a big open forest area, but somewhere down the line the Village could really do something with it.

Mayor Knudsen addressed Ms. Shinozuka and stated that the Council has been working behind the scenes to update the Village website but there are pages for each of the Boards and Committees and one of the things that they set out to do were to make sure that the by-laws and members were posted and that there is access to minutes of each meeting. It is still a work in progress, but hopefully it will be easier to get that uploaded once the website is completed. She added that North Park is on the Parks and Recreation site. May Knudsen also stated that Project Pride was responsible for the planting downtown.

  1. DISCUSSION - OPERATIONS
  1. Kings Pond Bergen County Open Space Trust Fund – Phase II

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Village is now required to hold a public hearing before applying for grants under Bergen County Open Space or Bergen County Historic Trust and so the projects will be explained and then public hearings will be held, which were advertised, and then resolutions will also be approved to authorize the Village to apply for these grants.

Ms. Mailander stated that she, Nancy Bigos, Chris Rutishauser, and Janet Fricke met with the residents on Lakeview Drive to let them know what was planned and to give them an opportunity to ask questions and give suggestions. It was very productive, and the residents had some good ideas and are very happy with the proposed improvements.

Ms. Bigos stated that in following through on the initial grant application for infrastructure and cleanup, the Village now wishes to apply for additional funding, of Phase II, through the Bergen County Open Space Grant. This would be for Phase II Park Amenities. As with any park development, it starts with a hardscape, which was the eradication of invasive Japanese Knotweed, roadway improvements which included a concrete vertical curb, drainage basins, pavement of the street, streetscape, landscaping with low buffer plantings, and two small parking lots consisting of eight parking spaces and one ADA space in each. A tree structure evaluation of the older trees on the park property was also done as part of Phase I.

Phase II would be a request for a grant application for $58,595.00 through the Bergen County Open Space Grant which is a matching fund from the Village of Ridgewood. That total request would be $117,190.00. Ms. Bigos stated this would include park amenities. Among these, a stone dust walking pathway 6 foot wide in a stone dust that would walk the users along the waterway, and along the path they anticipate five park benches and a new shade tree canopy. They are finding through the Village arborist that the majority of the willow trees there are past their prime and most likely should be taken down. Ms. Bigos added that they were also looking to provide a lawn area for active and passive play, and a fine top soil and grading of all open space. The final part would be the installation of a preschool/elementary playground.

Ms. Bigos reiterated the changes that would be done during Phase I, adding that Phase II would add some simple park amenities to this project. Mayor Knudsen opened for questions from the Village Council. Deputy Mayor Sedon asked if there was any idea if the funding was improved when Phase II would begin. Ms. Bigos stated that they were thinking that the very beginning of this project could begin in the late fall, as they need to start with the road and curb to define the property and then install the parking areas. She stated that the neighbors shared that some of the street lights were out, so there are simple improvements that can be done to highlight that area. Park cleanup also needs to be done. The 2018 grant application is due in Hackensack on Monday, June 18th, so after the hearing they would finalize the application as hopefully the resolution is passed tonight.

Councilman Voigt questioned Ms. Bigos about the new shade tree canopy since they were removing some trees. Ms. Bigos stated that they were looking for hardwood trees, and directed Councilman Voigt to look at the conceptual design that was provided. She stated that they were hoping to create a nice pathway with majestic trees, oaks, maples, hardwood trees that would be there for the next century or two. Councilman Voigt questioned how many trees that would be, to which Ms. Bigos responded 20 trees.

Councilwoman Walsh questioned the floodplain limit and if there was any impact with the stone dust if there was any flooding. Ms. Bigos stated that she didn’t believe it would come lose as she believes that the Village Engineer chose that because it was a porous surface and once the cinders come together they form themselves a semi-permanent base. Chris Rutishauser stated that the rock dust (or rock flour) does compact, and it can move if sufficient water force is applied. He added that they haven’t seen flooding in that area that has heavy force and push, but if there was a heavy flood it could erode but so could most surfaces. The rock flour was chose because with a steel edging it could be compacted and it is a suitable surface for someone in a wheelchair or for a parent pushing a child in a stroller. Mr. Rutishauser stated that it was a sand with sharp angular fragments and it if is washed away it would be mixed with any other materials.

Mayor Knudsen questioned regarding the willow trees and if they were something that would be planted there again. Ms. Bigos stated that willow trees love the water but they have shallow roots, and those trees are definitely more than 200 years old currently. Mayor Knudsen thanked Ms. Bigos as she can’t believe that they are at this place currently, and she appreciated all of her work.

Ms. Bigos added that the Ridgewood Wildscape on Sunday, June 10th is hosting Kings Pond Quest: Battling Invasive Species, and they are getting together to clear some of the Japanese Knotweed and to do a guided tour and some park cleanup. It is on the Parks and Recreation Facebook page. Mayor Knudsen thanked Ridgewood Wildscape for all of their hard work, energy, and commitment because they have been a driving force behind this project.

 

  1. Zabriskie-Schedler House – Historic Preservation – Phase III

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the Village was applying for grant funding for Phase III. Janet Fricke stated that in 2016 the Village received a grant for $116,000.00 which is a matching grant and is historic preservation. She added that they are taking additional steps to make sure that they reach every mark on historic preservation. There was a hearing for prequalifying potential contractors, as the contractor would need to be able to build a roof on an 1820’s Dutch building. In 2017, they asked for $200,000.00 which is pending with the Freeholders as there is a public hearing at Bergen County on June 14th, and anyone interested in giving a comment may attend.

Ms. Fricke stated that tonight’s hearing is on the third phase, regarding environmental abatement. There is asbestos in the putty in the windows, and additional things that take awhile to find out. She stated that the Village would like to open a safe project for the community. Initially, there was a letter of intent that the Village wanted $100,000.00 but looking more closely they think that for this 2018 request it can be brought down to $75,000.00. She stated that the Village was restoring and rehabilitating the house, including the roof and the interior systems, exterior shingles, environmental abatement including basement asbestos and paint which all has to be carefully taken care of. Ms. Fricke stated that what the Village Council hasn’t seen is the historic preservation plan which tells everything that needs to be done historically, and is a road map which the consultant put together. The road map shows exactly where the money needs to go. She added that the prequalification rules, which was spoken about during a meeting in February, is done and they hope to get some contractors over the next two months. First they have to be qualified as historic contractors, and then they go into the kind of work that needs to be done.

Ms. Fricke stated that the other part of the project is barrier free components. There is a bathroom on the first floor that will have to be redone as barrier free as well as the entrance coming into the building. She is hoping the Community Development Block Grant which would be a match against town funding would help offset that. The consultant is working to list the house on the National Historic Register and would be submitted by July 1st, and it takes about a month for them to process in Trenton.

Councilman Voigt questioned how the building would be used. Ms. Fricke stated that there would be smaller meeting rooms, lecture space, clubs and the public would be able to reserve it and meet there on a regular basis. Sports committees may have an interest, additionally story telling gathering spaces and committee workspace. She added it would be for residents and potentially at another point there may be a rental coming out of it and as opportunities show and people are interested it may be something that is compelling and people would show an interest. Councilman Voigt asked how much the Village is on the hook for. Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that it was around $392,000.00. Ms. Fricke agreed. Councilman Voigt questioned how the Village was paying that amount. Ms. Mailander stated that the money has been put into the Capital Budget over the years, each year a certain amount has been put in for improvements to this property and the house. Councilman Voigt questioned how much it would cost for upkeep each year. Ms. Fricke stated that she didn’t know the cost, but there was a maintenance plan that included the cycle on painting and cleaning. Ms. Mailander stated that the amount could be estimated, and it was possible that they may have to go outside for cleaning services but it would be something to look at. Ms. Fricke stated that the amount of maintenance is also the use and type of use.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that he was excited this was moving forward and saw it as great access to the Parks Department for everyone in Ridgewood.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that the last time she was on the Council there was a meeting at Schedler, and there was an article in the paper eight years ago. She added that she was glad that things were moving along.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she wanted to add to the use, as Janet Fricke pointed out that it was an opportunity to do as a rental as a more intimate setting because of the type of structure and the intimacy of the rooms. There was a conversation as to how it could be furnished with more period furniture to allow that kind of ambience and a potential revenue stream from a rental perspective. She added that the kitchen was set up as a catering kitchen and ideally situated to facilitate that type of use, and it is something that they should keep as a potential future use. Mayor Knudsen added that having this house on the State and potentially Federal Registry was something that the Village could be proud of.

Mayor Knudsen stated that the Council would take a motion to suspend the Work Session and convene a Special Public Meeting. Deputy Mayor Sedon moved the motion, and Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

  1. SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING - SEE SEPARATE MINUTES

Mayor Knudsen called for a motion to adjourn, there was a motion by Deputy Mayor Sedon to adjourn the special meeting and reconvene the Work Session.   Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

  1. PRESENTATION
  1. Acacia Financial Group

 

Ms. Mailander stated that Bob Rooney, Village CFO, and Josh Nyikita, from Acacia, are both going to present on the funding for the Hudson Street Parking Garage.

Josh Nyikita, from Acacia Financial Group, which are the financial advisors to the Village, introduced himself. Bob Rooney, also introduced himself as Chief Financial Officer and Parking Utility Director.

Mr. Rooney started the presentation by stating that the Village asked Mr. Nyikita to take a look at the debt that would be associated with the construction of the garage and any additional costs that might occur as a result. They asked him to look at different scenarios with a 25 and 30 year term on the debt, and if they were to capitalize interest what would the first couple of years cost the Village, and to take a look at the market as to where the Village would fall with short term borrowing and long term borrowing and what interest rates the Village would have.

Mr. Nyikita stated that he worked with Mr. Rooney and Ms. Mailander on preparing a number of financing structures and options that are available to the Village in connection with the Hudson Street Parking Garage. Given the AAA credit rating of the Village, he thinks the most attractive option and the least costly, would be the issuance of general obligation bonds of the Village. Short term notes are also an alternative, but given the current interest rate environment, they believe that long term fixed rate bonds are the best choice for the Village at this time. It would allow the Village to lock in the cost of the funds at current historically low interest rates and provide budget certainty for the parking utility, which is important given their review of the Walker Study. With respect to what those payments are going to be going forward, it is important given the size of the bondage.

Mr. Nyikita stated that the transaction being undertaken under local New Jersey Redevelopment Area Law, provides the Village with a lot of flexibility in terms of how the bonds can be structured and amortized. Typically when a bond is issued on a municipal level there is a level debt service structure over a period of 10, 20, or 30 years depending on the life of the project. There are strict limitations on how those bonds are amortized, and the principle has to be paid within one year of issuance. When looking at the Walker Parking Study, they are assuming that the first payment on the debt services is in 2020, so having that flexibility under redevelopment area law is a great tool in the toolbox when undertaking this project.

Mr. Nyikita stated that Acacia prepared a number of scenarios on both a 25 and a 30 year basis. They presented those options so that the Council can see what the cost is based on the current market conditions and based on amortization structures. Mr. Nyikita presented the traditional leveled debt service structure, similar to a mortgage as the same payment is made semi annually over the term of the bond. They also showed what a deferred principle service would look like, deferred until 2021, which results in slightly smaller payments in 2019 and 2020 but then it ramps up in 2021. Mr. Nyikita also stated that the final scenario for the 25 year option is deferred principle to 2021 with capitalized interest in 2019. He added that under this scenario, additional money is borrowed for the interest payment and is set aside in an account and used for the payment instead of funds from the parking utility, which can smooth out any particular increases related to the parking project itself.

For the 30 year scenarios, they ran the same scenarios; level debt service, deferred principle for two years, and then deferred principle for two years with the capitalized interest. Mr. Nyikita stated that the Village could begin a ramping up of debt service in the 30 year option so that it doesn’t jump from $462,722 but rather $462,000 to $562,000, and so forth. He added that they would work closely with Walker in the pro-forma that they presented in the parking study to create a scenario that has a mix of the lowest cost of funding while being sensitive to the parking rates that are needed to generate enough revenue to pay for the operations in debt service on the bond issue.

Mr. Nyikita stated that as far as the market goes, rates remain very attractive, and most Wall Street forecasts project interest rates in general to continue to tick upward which is a reason why they are recommending locking in long term borrowing rates now. The recent rate increases have been felt on the front end of the yield curve, and they have had a significant flattening of the yield curve meaning that short term rates are rising quicker than long term rates. He added that there has been a 1% increase in interest rates on the short term side within a one year period, and it is very volatile right now. He stated that they would advise long term fixed rate bonds in connection with this transaction.

Mr. Nyikita displayed a graph showing more information on the interest rate environment. He stated that looking at the yield curve, showing that the spread between the one year rate and the thirty year rate which was a spread of almost 4% in December 2010, whereas today the spread is 1.3%. He added that this supports Acacia’s recommendation to do fixed rate bonds. At this point, Mr. Nyikita stated that he would welcome any questions.

Councilman Voigt questioned how long principle could be deferred for. Mr. Nyikita stated that under the Redevelopment Area Law, it is flexible and can be deferred for any number of years as there is no requirement that it needs to be paid down under the law. He would say that the bigger constraint that the Village would have is the financial model itself. He stated that if you run the model out over a 20 or 30 year period the Village would want to see that every year they are meeting their coverages, which is what would dictate the amortization structure. Councilman Voigt pointed out that Mr. Nyikita picked two years to defer the principle, and questioned what if that was extended to five years. Mr. Nyikita stated that would increase the cost overall, and when looking at all of the scenarios you can see that the more you defer principle and amortize interest it adds to the cost of the overall borrowing.

Councilman Voigt questioned as a way of paying for this garage does Mr. Nyikita recommend deferring principle for a period of time. Mr. Nyikita stated that in the last Walker Study from February 2018, in order to meet the coverages and provide additional surplus funds for maintenance and to provide some additional cushion, it would make sense to defer principle for a number of years in the beginning part of the bond issue, meaning you wouldn’t want to go ten years or beyond but maybe there is some middle ground in the first couple of years to being generating some surpluses and mitigating spikes in parking rates. Councilman Voigt questioned if he would be comfortable from a financial analysis standpoint if the principle was deferred for 4 to 5 years. Mr. Rooney responded that one of the things that the Council would have to take into consideration would be the timing of rate increases, adding that the Village would have to work closely with Walker as to how to project the debt as to what makes sense. Building up reserves for 4 to 5 years may be an alternative to defer the principle payments, at the same time bringing in more revenue. But if the Village tries to balance that it may be two years. Mr. Rooney added that there were a lot of moving parts to this. Councilman Voigt stated that he was worried about jacking up the parking rates immediately and maybe if it was done over time it would be more palatable.

Mr. Nyikita stated that regarding deferring the principle payments, and with respect to capitalizing interest, there are limitations on how much you can capitalize interest, typically up until six months after the construction completion date. For example, if it was a year to complete construction you could capitalize interest for 18 months on the bond issue.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that there was a note on the presentation that municipal bond issuance is down about 26% this year versus last year, and he was wondering if that was expected to go up. Mr. Nyikita stated that he thinks the tax reform law that was passed at the end of last year, it eliminated certain aspects of the municipal market which is driving that down primarily. Advance for fundings are no longer permitted, so that was about a quarter of the market looking back historically over the last five years, and what they saw was at the end of 2017 there was a huge rush to get the market. December 2017 was the largest issuance month in the history of the municipal market pre-1986 with over $60 billion in issuance. That is causing some dry up in bond issuance in the first half of this year, but also because they can no longer do certain bond issuances.

Deputy Mayor Sedon asked if the Village was issuing the bonds for this, would that help negotiate a couple basis points off the interest rate because of the less issuance out there. Mr. Nyikita stated that it was purely supply and demand, and there is a strong demand for bonds particularly in New Jersey because it is a high income state, so investors want that tax free bond and having a AAA credit rating is that much more attractive. There will be a lot of interest in this bond, so that is why Acacia is recommending going out long term and doing it as soon as the Village can while rates remain attractive because they do believe eventually rates will push up. Because tax rates are now lower, the benefit of tax-exempt bonds isn’t a great to wealthy individuals who generally purchase them, but right now the dynamics are pretty favorable.

Councilwoman Walsh asked whether in these numbers, Mr. Nyikita was including the sinking fund for maintenance for the garage, as the Village was given a life expectancy of +/- 30 years. Mr. Rooney stated that the suggestion would be that so much money is put aside every year into a maintenance fund, taking that money out of the surplus, so that way in case there is the need to do any big projects, there is money put aside for it. In the capital number right now is construction of roughly $11 million and a 5% add-on for cost of issuance which can and probably will change because of the redevelopment laws, and the capitalized interest number if that gets charged back to the ordinance. Mr. Rooney stated that the maintenance part would be on a go-forward basis. Councilwoman Walsh stated of the numbers that were talked about in the presentation, she didn’t know if surplus was the way to look at it because they didn’t know if there would be surplus in the coming 30 years. In terms of the maintenance sinking fund, that would be part of the budget going forward as a surplus wouldn’t be the thought process. Mr. Rooney stated that she was correct in what she was saying, as he had a conversation with Walker this morning and it will determine when the rate increases are put into place as to whether or not there will be surplus generated on the beginning of the amortization period in which case a portion of that would be put aside for the maintenance, otherwise it is an operating cost every year to be dealt with.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that her other question was regarding the AAA rating and she wondered if the Village would be charged basis points with such a good rating. Mr. Nyikita stated that the 50 basis points was being conservative as they wouldn’t be selling the bonds today but rather a couple months from now. They believe the Federal government will be taking action in June and there is a lot of volatility in the market so Acacia likes to put a cushion on what the current market is to be conservative. Councilwoman Walsh asked what the value of that was. Mr. Nyikita stated that the numbers are based on current market conditions, and there is a daily AAA index called Municipal Market Data, and all bonds are priced off of that. AAA issuers may price a little wider than that plus 10-15 basis points, and Acacia did that plus 50 basis points. Councilwoman Walsh questioned if the numbers could go down based on the rating. Mr. Nyikita stated that was the hope but the Village would not know its rates until the bond sale takes place.

Councilwoman Walsh questioned what possible options could the Village have in terms of financing if somewhere along the road there is some sort of event that has to be acted upon and they have to fix it immediately, would this money be restructured. Mr. Rooney stated that would be additional, if there was something that had to be dealt with to the permanent structure, assuming there was no money left in this ordinance, there would have to be another ordinance to move forward. This is deductible under redevelopment laws so it doesn’t impact the Village’s borrowing power. Mr. Nyikita stated that this bondage itself will have a call feature, and the standard call feature in a municipal market is 10 years, so on the anniversary if rates are lower at that time the Village would be sliding down the yield curve. He added that most bonds do end up getting refunded for savings and at that time if restructuring is something that the future Council would like to consider based on the operating budget of the parking utility that’s something that can be done. Councilwoman Walsh stated that because of the design with potential retail, the Village could make the change at ten years.

Councilman Hache stated that he liked the 50 basis point cushion as it is very conservative as the most that the curve has moved since the end of last year is about 42 basis points on the 30 year end so he liked that they were building in a catastrophic scenario. He added that he keeps going back to the fact that the designation for the Redevelopment Area is done and he wanted to thank the Mayor for bringing that to the forefront; it has been a significant cost savings, and includes having more flexibility in financing options. Councilman Hache stated that assuming that the Village goes with any option, and looks at different scenarios as to how far to defer the principle, but given this cost of issuance and the option to defer, he asked what it would look in terms of the rate increases. He assumed that by doing this they would be able to smooth out the Walker parking rate increases over a longer period of time. In terms of matching out the ongoing operating cost of the utility with the added impact of having this garage added into it versus the financing timetable and what the costs of debt service would be. Mr. Rooney stated that what he thought the next step would be to go back to Walker, present the numbers to them that the Council has chosen and come up with three scenarios as to the timing of a rate increase, what the impact would have as to the debt service coverage, and that way the Village could get a better feel for how it wants to proceed.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she would be very concerned with any deferred principle for any extended period of time, and she feels that it would be the most irresponsible thing that the Village would be doing. She added that back in 2015 when the first garage iteration was presented, she felt at the time that the Village should have test marketed the increases at that time and they would have been banking all of that all this time and had those incremental increases which would have been significantly less burdensome to visitors and shoppers and diners. Her inclination was to increase the meter rates as quickly as possible as it is going to happen and it’s the inevitable, so the Village should be looking to accomplish that sooner rather than later because that’s the cushion that the Village will build up. Mr. Nyikita stated that looking at it objectively from a financial standpoint, its purely mathematical, that if the Village is willing to do the rate increases now and pay the debt service off early because that is going to be the lowest cost. He added that the question is what is a reasonable level that the Council and ratepayers are comfortable with that will work with the system. He added that he would agree that deferring principle for ten years would not be recommended, and asked if there was a balance in the beginning of what can work and use those monies that are deferred to create a surplus fund to lower rates and provide for maintenance and rate stability in other years. Mr. Nyikita stated that was what Mr. Rooney was saying about different scenarios that could be presented. Mayor Knudsen stated that the Village never knows what happens in any given year. There are ups and downs in revenue streams, so having that cushion and using the deferred principle very conservatively is the best approach in her opinion.

Deputy Mayor Sedon asked Mr. Rooney about the kiosks, as there was discussion about implementing them and one was being piloted at the Chestnut Street parking lot and that could potentially increase revenues without increasing rates. He was wondering if Mr. Rooney had any thought to that. Mr. Rooney stated that the kiosk is working, and they have seen increased revenue especially in the use of cash, which is a plus, but with that being said there are a couple glitches as to how the cash is being reported in terms of internal mechanisms. Once that is resolved in the next month, he would present to Council a plan for where to put the next kiosks and how to move forward with that.

Councilman Hache stated that they did rough calculations a month ago, looking at the revenue in that lot prior to the installation of the kiosk over the previous 12 months versus a projection over the next 12 months and it was almost an increase of 20%. Mayor Knudsen stated that was anticipated from the beginning of the process with the kiosk. This is because the Village is not losing the role over money as everyone starts anew when parking in the lot. She added that it was important that part of the process in moving forward with the garage was always with the understanding that the meter rates would be increased so if they are getting that 20% increase by installing kiosks system wide and the rates are increased, the revenue stream is significantly increased. Mayor Knudsen added that this was the most important thing that they could do as it would provide a cushion in the event of any unforeseen issues.

Councilman Hache stated that they had talked about the differential in pricing as an on-street spot is worth a lot more money than a lot, so they can look at also making parking in the lots more attractive to get people to go there. He added that it was something that they could look at with the kiosks, and suggested rolling them out on-street with the premium pricing for the on street spots. Mr. Rooney stated that this was something that could be brought before Walker as they have all the data for on street and off street as to what that impact might be so the Village can make a comparison. Mayor Knudsen added that the one benefit of that is the abuses of repeat parking and employee issues, as the kiosk is a better monitoring system of those abuses.

 

  1. Licensing Sellers of E-Cigarettes

Ms. Mailander stated that Dawn Cetrulo, Director of Health Department and Health Officer, as well as Karen Blumenfeld, Executive Director of New Jersey Global Advisors of Smoke Free Policy (NJGASP) would be presenting on licensing sellers of e-cigarettes.

Ms. Cetrulo stated that the smoking world has changed as its not about smoking cigarettes anymore, it has turned into vaping and e-cigarettes. Technically, e-cigarettes are not regulated, but certain towns are starting to regulate them. If they are licensed, Ms. Cetrulo would be recommending a $1,200 fee per establishment. Currently there are four establishments in town that sell them, she knows of nine that are licensed to sell cigarettes. Generally, the funds from licensing and inspecting these establishments are used to promote non-smoking among youngsters as it is very popular with middle schoolers and high schoolers. Ms. Cetrulo stated that the funding would also be used for the Tobacco Age of Sale Program, which is a program that was funded by the State.

Ms. Blumenfeld stated that electronic smoking devices are very popular among youth and young adults. There is a triple increase in just one year according to the Federal government of youth using electronic smoking devices. The problems with electronic smoking devices are the chemical components that make up the vapor and some of those chemicals are carcinogenic. There have been studies on these chemicals that show the dangerous components. She added that studies are coming out that show the dangers of second hand vapor smoke. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that there are many communities across the State that have banned smoking and vaping in their parks and recreations areas. In Trenton the policymakers, Assembly and Senate, voted through a bill that made all State, County, and local parks as well as beaches 100% smoke-free and vape-free.

Ms. Blumenfeld stated that there is the issue of how all of the young people are getting these products, and its about the access of these e-cigarette devices to young people. It is quite disconcerting because they now come in all shapes, sizes, and forms. The jewel device has a pod that goes on it with liquid nicotine, which looks like a flash drive and teachers don’t realize that they are actually e-cigarettes.

Ms. Blumenfeld stated that individuals need to be 21 to buy these devices, also these products cannot be given or furnished, as there is a civil monetary penalty. E-cigarette refills need to be in childproof containers, Governor Christie signed that into law and it went into effect about a year ago. She added that the State does not require stores to get a license from the Treasury to sell these products, unlike cigarettes which needs a retail cigarette license from the State. She stated that about 30 towns in the State have ordinances through the Health Departments, passed by the Board of Health or the Council requiring that if a retailer wants to sell these products they need to get a license from the local Health Department and there is an annual fee. This way the local Health Department knows who is selling the product and can ensure compliance with the State laws. Any local ordinances are in addition to that then the Health Department can do that, but it is very difficult to do without some type of a tracking mechanism. The licensing fees then go back into the health system to make sure that parts aren’t sold to young people, the compliance check program, and other types of programming.

Paramus and Woodridge have passed ordinances, with the average rate at $1,200 for the licensing. Ms. Blumenfeld recommended that towns should look at what they charge for a retail liquor license, which in Ridgewood is $2,500. Ms. Blumenfeld suggested that the Village Council think about the channel of production through sale that the State regulates when it comes to cigarettes. A manufacturer, wholesaler, distributor, retailer, all are regulated by a license. Towns are now starting to say that they are not only interested in licensing retailers of e-cigarettes but also the remainder of the chain, and they need to ensure that they product is made in childproof containers, or if it is re-sold it doesn’t go to someone who is underage. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that there does need to be more regulation, but while the Federal Government decides what they are going to do, tobacco always comes back to the grassroots level and always starts at home rule.

Ms. Blumenfeld stated that there was one community that did not want to have any vape stores in their town, so in their ordinance they included that kind of language. She added that the Council could decide if this was something that they wanted to do, and then what they wanted to include. To keep the ordinances up to date, they need to include electronic smoking devices, school property K-12 public and private needs to be smoke free fence to fence. The vehicles K-12 need to be smoke free and vape free. If there is an activity sponsored by a school and taking place off of school property that also needs to be smoke free and vape free. This year the State Legislature also passed a law that required all public schools K-12 to be tobacco free.

Ms. Blumenfeld stated that flavorings for the e-cigarettes and the packaging do not appeal to adults, they appeal to children and teenagers. There is a movement to try and pear that back, and even the FDA has given a word on this as well. Councilman Voigt questioned whether Ms. Blumenfeld had several ordinances that she could provide to the Council. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that they do have a database of the ordinances that have passed and she would be happy to share that with the Council. Councilwoman Walsh stated that this has been a conversation in her house because her children keep saying that their friends are vaping, so it is a topic that she thinks has to be discussed because her children educated her on what the kids are doing. They are not just putting nicotine in, but other drugs as well. This is a huge concern for the Village if this is going on, and they need the device to be able to do it.

Councilman Hache stated that this was very informative, as he witnesses a lot of younger kids sneaking off around town and it is very concerning because the effects of nicotine is still there, the addictive qualities of it. It starts with the coolness factor, now kids buy these things because it’s the cool gadget to get. Councilman Hache questioned if there was anything moving through the Legislature regarding the licensing of e-cigarette retailers. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that there was legislation introduced last session, and has been introduced again for this legislative session but it hasn’t moved yet. Councilman Hache asked whether there was something similar to her educating the students and teachers regarding how these devices work, and asked whether School Resource Officers are included in this. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that after school hours they present to the PTO’s, but during the school day when they present it is usually in the classroom or in an assembly. She stated that she didn’t know if the other adults that were present were the individuals that Councilman Hache was asking about. She added that it would be very helpful to have that component brought in.

Councilman Hache questioned how this was tying in to the imminent legalization of marijuana in the State of New Jersey. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that the e-cigarettes are already being used for illicit drugs, including marijuana. Her understanding from Police is that it cannot be smelled when it is vaped, so someone could be using an e-cigarette or jewel and be using marijuana right by you and you can’t see the smoke or smell it. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that there was a chemical called diacetyl and it causes popcorn lung disease which is only cured through a lung transplant. The FDA allows a small amount of diacetyl to be used in food consumption because it has a buttery flavor and feel on the palate. Many employees in popcorn factories came down with this disease because of the diacetyl, and the scientists found that when you eat the diacetyl it is metabolized differently than when you breathe it in. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that she believes that the UK banned diacetyl in the liquids.

Councilman Hache thanked Ms. Blumenfeld for bringing up the chemical element. He added that he definitely thinks that the Council needs to update the smoke free ordinance to include e-cigarettes as soon as possible because his concern is what happens in the schools and goes undetected. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that there was a company in New York making some kind of a detector device for the vapor from electronic smoking devices and are talking to school systems about it. Help for schools is definitely needed, but the education is the most important because people are not aware of the chemicals. She added that these cannot be advertised as smoking cessation devices because they do not have FDA approval. Ms. Blumenfeld stated that when she was in Trenton on Monday, testifying on the smoke free parks and beaches. A representative for the vaping products was saying that they should be exempt from the bill because they help people quit smoking. However, the FDA has told retailers that they cannot use this wording at all when they are marketing these devices.

Ms. Blumenfeld stated that when she is presenting to students she points out that the nicotine is affecting their brain development. The choices that you make now even though there may be external influences, are really important. Mayor Knudsen asked if the four shops that sell e-cigarettes sell vape. Ms. Cetrulo stated that she was not sure exactly what the stores sold, but they sold something of this form of electronic smoking devices. There hasn’t been actual surveys by going into all the businesses, but it is just what has been found. Mayor Knudsen stated that it was hard to believe how something like this could become such an issue and there is no control or oversight so people and kids are out there doing this and there is no way to know what the long term impact is to health.

Ms. Blumenfeld stated that New Jersey was the first State to ban e-cigarette use in any public or work place in 2009, which took effect in 2010, which was just when e-cigarettes got on the market. From the standpoint of de-normalizing e-cigarettes inside public and workplaces, New Jersey gets an A+ for that. However, she gets the feeling that the State is trying to do the best that it can. New Jersey could be the first State to ban smoking and vaping at all public, local, County and State parks and beaches.

  1. DISCUSSION
  1. Ridgewood Water – None

 

  1. Parking

 

  1. Valet Parking – Broad Street

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this was discussed previously, as the Council had some concerns regarding valet parking outside of Steel Wheel Tavern. Chris Rutishauser was given all of the questions that the Council asked and can address any additional questions. Mr. Rutishauser stated that Sergeant Chuck was detained on a police matter and was unable to attend the meeting tonight.

The Village was approached by Steel Wheel Tavern on North Broad Street to implement a valet service for their patrons similar to those currently at Roots and Park West. Mr. Rutishauser stated that he looked at the location and the best spot for them to have patrons drop off cars and valet park them would be the three spaces just south of Franklin Avenue along the Northbound direction of North Broad Street. Those are the three spaces just before the traffic light. They have asked for seven days, which is subject to the Council’s opinion. He stated that Roots and Park West are very successful with their valet service, however other places have ceased using it or never really implemented it.

Mr. Rutishauser stated that they have looked at this location, and feel those are the best spaces for implementation of the valet. The traffic control signal is at that intersection, as well as the pedestrian crosswalk which is well marked.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that she was in the area recently observing the traffic patterns and she felt that even when this was first presented she couldn’t see how this would be a safe process, and the more that she has been in that area she personally doesn’t think that this would be wise for the Council to approve. Councilman Voigt asked whether they could look at spaces that are closer in rather than next to the light. Mr. Rutishauser stated that they looked at that, but the spaces in front of the restaurant are angled spaces, which would need many more individual spaces to make a successful drop off and pickup in comparison to the three proposed that are just parallel to the curb. He stated that the restaurant initially thought that they could use the alleyway next to Boiling Springs, but they were not able to obtain absolute permission from the property owner but they were unable to achieve that.

Councilman Voigt questioned whether they were amenable to not having it every day, but during the busy times on Thursday, Friday, Saturday. Ms. Mailander stated that all of the valets in the Village have it everyday of the week, they just don’t use it everyday of the week. It is mostly used Thursday, Friday, Saturday. There are times during the day when they have to pay for the meters because they have a daytime event. Councilman Voigt questioned whether it could be tested out a couple of days to see from a safety and logistics standpoint. Mr. Rutishauser stated that from the other valet locations, the Police Department have kept a close eye and been firm if there are any issues with the valets. They like to make sure that all of the valets have driver’s licenses and are not on a revoked list, the Police Department is very vigilant in that aspect. If a valet attendant commits a motor vehicle violation, they get issued a summons. Mr. Rutishauser stated that in speaking the Sergeant Chuck, they don’t tolerate any improprieties.

Councilman Voigt questioned where they would be parking the cars. Mr. Rutishauser stated that they would be parking offsite in a private lot. Deputy Mayor Sedon questioned when Boiling Springs Bank closed. Mr. Rutishauser stated that he was unsure, but this should not affect them because they have parking on the east side of the building and have rights on the driveway. Deputy Mayor Sedon questioned if there was any concern with how close the drop off and pick up would be to the actual traffic light for cutting into a queue as there are people driving around looking for parking spaces that can stack up at that light. Mr. Rutishauser stated that if there is an issue of too many cars at once, the valet attendants are going to be advised that they can’t stack. The valets have to obey the signal and if there is an issue with them blocking the street Mr. Rutishauser is certain that the Police Department would advise them that it is not permitted.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that when the light is red and someone wants to make a right and can go on the side and form another lane when the light changes. He was wondering if that double stack waiting to turn left or right would make a mess for someone to also have to cut into that traffic and if that would be a problem. Mr. Rutishauser stated that he didn’t think it would be that much of a problem because there is the dedicated left turn lane, and then a dedicated lane that is either straight or right. There are then the three parallel parking spaces that the valet would occupy for pick up and drop off. The valet would have to use due caution and merge into the straight or right turn only lane to bring the car to storage or for the customers to leave in their cars. Deputy Mayor Sedon asked if the parking lot was to the right. Mr. Rutishauser stated that no left turn was anticipated. Deputy Mayor Sedon asked whether they felt comfortable that this would be alright. Mr. Rutishauser stated that they felt comfortable that it can work, as the valet has to understand that they have a finite capacity that they have to manage. Managing that capacity is predicated on having enough attendants.

Deputy Mayor Sedon questioned if there was a way to pilot this for a certain amount of time instead of issuing a permit for a year, or if a permit is issued would they be able to get out of it if it becomes obvious that it is not working after a week or a month. Mr. Rutishauser stated that subject to Mr. Rogers opinion that was certainly within the Council’s purview.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that she walked across that street a lot recently, and people turn from Franklin onto Broad Street and they do the illegal U-turn into the slotted spots on a regular basis. Everybody double parks in front of Dunkin Donuts, either letting someone run in or picking someone up. She reiterated that these were her observations. There is always a car illegally parked at the corner when there are no spots, which impedes the view of anyone walking across the crosswalk at the beginning of Ridgewood and Broad. There is a consistent challenge with parking along there. To add the valet now, there would be three lanes of traffic because the valets won’t be parking but rather moving cars. There are pedestrians, drivers, and Councilwoman Walsh she didn’t think it was worth a pilot as it is a dangerous situation. She added that the commuters start coming home around 5:00 P.M. and so they would be dodging traffic all night.

Councilman Hache agreed with Councilwoman Walsh’s assessment, adding that he tries to avoid that intersection as there is bad lighting and sight issues with pedestrians going to and from the train station. He stated that valet parking in general in front of specific stores came up at the last business forum and he was amazed at how all of the businesses that were there rejected the notion of having valet parking specific to certain businesses. Some even cited the revenue that was lost because of the parking spaces that were bagged when they were still open and the restaurants were opening up. Councilman Hache stated that the other concern that was noted is that it creates no foot traffic as people drop off their car and then leave and haven’t walked past one store in the Central Business District.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she too saw the illegal behavior that Councilwoman Walsh had mentioned. She doesn’t think that double parked cars and illegal u turns could be the measure when they contemplate the valet for a business, as that illegal behavior is an enforcement issue. She felt that you couldn’t penalize a business for illegal behavior that is occurring. Mayor Knudsen stated that she would be concerned that by not permitting one restaurant to have valet service while allowing others to have valet service, in someone’s mind might be giving an unfair advantage to some restaurants while saying that the decision about valet is based on the location and immediate surrounding area. She stated that she disagreed with Councilman Voigt to test this during the busiest time because that’s when there would most likely be the problems.

Mayor Knudsen stated that in a way, valet actually removes vehicles from the street. Mr. Rutishauser stated that it was a way of making the Village’s parking situation a little more efficient. Mayor Knudsen stated that it stopped people from driving around the block repeatedly so it could have the effect of removing some vehicular traffic. She added that she would be open to testing it out, but she would be concerned as to whether or not valet was something that the Village wanted to continue with or stop. Mayor Knudsen stated that the issue of valet needs to be addressed because she has heard similar complaints that some people can actually measure the drop in their revenue based on when the valet actually came in and the loss of those parking spaces to that particular business and the lack of foot traffic. Mayor Knudsen added that the opportunity has to be applied fairly to everyone, whether they continued with or stopped the allowance of valet services by businesses.

Ms. Mailander stated that what she needed to get was a sense of the Council as to whether or not there are enough votes to be able to adopt the ordinance. Mayor Knudsen stated that she would vote for it because the Village has valet and it could have the effect of removing vehicles out of the constant rotation around the block, but there would also have to be a commitment to enforcement to stop the illegal behavior. Councilman Voigt stated that he would support it. Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that he was unsure about this, as he sees how tight that intersection is and how crazy things can get there. He added that if Engineering and the Police Department are comfortable with it, they have more expertise than he does, but he would want to try it. He stated that maybe there was wording added about the light and concerns about safety so that it is piloted for a month or two and then gets revisited with feedback from the business and observations from Police and Engineering and then make a decision as to whether or not it should be made permanent for that location. Ms. Mailander stated that she agrees that there should be enforcement with what Councilwoman Walsh is mentioning and it is something that she will be getting done because it shouldn’t continue. Councilman Hache and Councilwoman Walsh stated that they were both no.

Ms. Mailander stated that there were enough votes to adopt the ordinance. It could be pushed forward to the July meeting for introduction and then adoption in August. She added that they would see what can be done in the ordinance itself to have a trial period and have the Police observe to see how it works.

Councilman Voigt questioned whether Steel Wheel would attend a Council meeting when this gets introduced to hear their perspective. Ms. Mailander stated that it was possible to have them attend a meeting.

 

  1. Budget

 

  1. Appointment of Municipal Humane Law Enforcement Officers

Ms. Mailander stated that the appointment of a Municipal humane law enforcement officer was signed into law in 2017, and took effect on May 1. It requires an ordinance and a resolution to appoint these officers. The plan is to name three animal control officers of TYCO Animal Control to these positions. Full background investigations have to be done for these individuals and the Police Chief would have to approve their appointment. Ms. Mailander stated that Mr. Rogers has been reviewing the ordinance and it would be discussed again in July as there were several areas where perhaps the ordinance needs more work.

Mr. Rogers stated that this is being recommended by the Police Chief and is something that the State Legislature has decided to adopt and permit municipalities to participate and it was just a matter of getting the ordinance straightened out, which can be done in July if that’s the way the Council would like to go. Ms. Mailander stated that it would be checked as it may be something that is required.

 

  1. Contributions as Tax Payments – Charitable Contribution Law

 

Ms. Mailander stated that on May 4th, Governor Murphy signed Senate Bill 1893 which authorizes municipalities, counties and school districts to establish one or more charitable funds, which are for specific public purposes, and permits certain donations to those charitable funds to be credited toward the donor’s property tax obligation. This has been talked about for a while, and it actually takes effect July 3rd. At a conference that Ms. Mailander attended, it was indicated that the State Division of Community Affairs, Treasury, Education, and Banking and Insurance are going through the rule making process at this time to set out the rules to do so. However, there was some indication from the IRS that they see it as circumventing the property tax deduction from Federal Taxes and so it may not be something that the Village should consider.

Mr. Rooney stated that in December 2017 the Federal government changed the tax law, tax brackets, personal exemptions were being eliminated, standard deductions were increased, SALT deductions were capped. There was no change to charitable contributions. In January 2018, Congressman Gottheimer proposed individuals donate to a town run charity which would allow taxpayers to contribute the amount they pay in annual property taxes to an established charitable trust. This led to Senate Bill 1893 passed by both houses in April 2018.

Mr. Rooney stated that this legislation will allow the property tax credit currently proposed to be capped at 90%. As of right now there is up to a 10% charge that a municipality can charge to administer these funds. It gives the local unit the ability to establish a charitable fund so that donors can put money into the fund and credit it towards their taxes for State, Local and County. This would also require administration by each entity to establish the funds that can be contributed to and require the municipality to funnel those monies into these respective areas. Mr. Rooney stated that an individual would need to be identified as the custodian of these funds, and a separate bank account would have to be maintained. The law also says that the regulations will need to be promulgated by the Department of Community Affairs, Treasury, Education, and Banking and Insurance in order to address issues such as budgeting, tax collection, financial administration, mortgage servicing, and property tax relief programs.

Mr. Rooney stated that there was a lot of guidance that the State still has to come up with before this could be administered. The enactment of this law does not guarantee that the IRS will consider contributions to local unit charitable funds to be a committed deduction from the tax payers Federal income tax obligation. The IRS issued a notice 218-54 which informs taxpayers that the Department of Treasury and the IRS intend to propose regulations addressing the Federal income tax treatment of certain payments made by taxpayers for which taxpayers receive a credit against their State and Local taxes. In response to limitations placed by SALT deductions, some State legislations are considering or have adopted legislative proposals that will allow taxpayers to make transfers to funds controlled by State or local governments in exchange for credits against the State and local taxes the taxpayer is required to pay. This would allow taxpayers to characterize such transfer as fully deductible charitable contributions for Federal tax purposes while using the same transfers to satisfy their State and local tax liability. Despite State efforts to circumvent, taxpayers must be mindful that Federal law controls the proper characterization of payments for Federal income tax purposes.

Mr. Rooney stated that there has been no decision on either side as to how this will be moving forward. Councilman Voigt questioned if someone owed $10,000 in property tax per year and gave $1000 to a charitable entity. Mr. Rooney stated if the charitable entity has been established by the municipality school district for the County. Councilman Voigt stated that rather than getting $10,000 the municipality gets $9,000, and asked if that would reduce the general tax revenues for the year in terms of discretionary funds. Mr. Rooney stated that there was a lot of planning that was involved but it was basically just a matter of what bucket you put it into, as you would still get the same amount of tax revenue, it is just how it is designated.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that the local government would be the charity, so someone owes $16,000 in property taxes they can pay $10,000 to the Village the way they always have and then that would be written off at the Federal level and then the $6,000 would be put into the Village of Ridgewood charity fund, and it would still go to taxes for school, County, and the Village, it would just go into a different bank account but would be distributed in the same way out of that. He asked if there was any indication as to what the Federal Government’s take is going to be on this as he was all for doing this if it was allowable as it would help out the residents. Mr. Rooney stated that he has read several articles, some say don’t do anything until December, others say that the State is going to come out with some guidance and procedures which may not be effective until next year. There are a lot of different theories and he has not read anything related to timing.

Deputy Mayor Sedon asked how much work Mr. Rooney would have to put in to establish the accounts, charities, and the trust. Mr. Rooney stated that it would be significant work, as it would have to be enacted and voted on by the Council to establish it, and he was waiting on some guidance from the State as to where to go next. Councilman Voigt asked if the Village was restricted in the charitable fund definition. Mr. Rooney stated that the other part of this is that a charitable contribution is supposed to be without benefit, in this case there is a benefit though as some services will come back. This is what the IRS is dealing with, how to classify this to be able to get around that concept.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that Mr. Rooney used the word circumvent, and her opinion that once they try to circumvent things to come to a conclusion it doesn’t usually work out well. In her work she deals with a lot of people that have tax issues and she always tells them that she is not a tax expert as they need to consult a tax expert, which she believes is the other key thing here. This is going to be applied to different individuals in different ways because of their total income, type of income, whether they are paid through an LLC, and the Village has no idea the income the taxpayers make and how they make it and how they do their tax returns. So, for them to give them false hope that they are going to get this deductible donation. If it isn’t, they are going to come back to the Village and say that it would work better if they put it through another way. She read several of articles and it doesn’t sound to her that the IRS would let the money go and she doesn’t think it is going to happen. Councilwoman Walsh stated that it would be a challenge for the Village and a lot of work for Mr. Rooney.

Councilman Hache stated that he agreed with Councilwoman Walsh, and that until the analysts came out a definitive statement on what the position is, he didn’t see it happening. In the unlikely event that it does happen, they could look at retroactively to January 1 if it takes three months to ramp things up, as he would not like Mr. Rooney to do all of that work for something that might not happen. Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that was where he was going as well. Mayor Knudsen stated that if it is perceived as circumventing that could be a nightmare. Mr. Rooney stated that there is a risk that the taxpayer relies on it and makes payments and then when they file a Federal tax return and are disallowed and would have penalties and interest. Mr. Rogers stated that for Mr. Rooney to set up administratively without knowing where the IRS was going did not make any sense.

Mayor Knudsen stated that there was a statement that was made that this is happening in other states already, and she was wondering if Mr. Rooney knew exactly what that was and what they were referring to. Mr. Rooney stated that an example in one of the communications was the State of California where 30 to 40 charities were set up, but they are more or less like scholarship funds, and individuals can contribute to the scholarship without the money going towards the governmental entity that is providing the service. Under California law they stipulate that is considered a charitable contribution and is allowable and the IRS is on board with that.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that it sounds like the Village has time because the State hasn’t stipulated anything. Mr. Rooney stated that he thought that by July 3rd something would have to come out because that is when the law goes into effect, so the State is going to have to say something at that point. Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that they should wait and see what the statement says. Mr. Rooney was in agreement.

 

  1. Award Contract – School Bus Transportation – Recreation Department

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this contract was for the day camp and the day camp trips. The Village is going to reject the former bid because it didn’t allow for ADA compliance and if there were students or people going to the camp or on trips who had disabilities it would be difficult for them to get on the bus. This new proposal did have those provisions in it and three bids were received. The three bids varied in price from $31,804 to $37,182. TransEd was cheaper for the daily transportation services, and then First Student was the lowest for each of the two categories of day camp trips. It is being recommended that two line items for daily transportation services be awarded to TransEd and then two line items for day camp trips be awarded to First Student. Once it is awarded, each company can provide the required school bus driver qualifications as called for in the bid documents for review by the Village Police Department. This includes State and National criminal background checks for the drivers and contracts for staff with no felony or misdemeanor arrest or charges of moral servitude or being listed as a sex predator. Drivers must have a physical screening as well as hearing and vision tests. The field supervisor shall oversee the bus operation at all times since the buses are going to be transporting children. There are several field trips and all of them can be accessed without travelling on highways if so desired.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that one of the middle schools had a challenge with a class trip because there were no seat belts on the bus. She asked if that was something that the Village was obligated to make sure that there were seat belts on the bus. Ms. Mailander stated that it would be checked, as she was under the impression that it was state law that all buses have lap belts. Mayor Knudsen stated that she had asked Ms. Mailander the same question earlier. Councilman Hache stated that the lap belts were a requirement, and he was under the impression that Congressman Gottheimer was trying to push for the shoulder belt as well. Councilwoman Walsh asked if it could be clarified that the buses that are used are complaint with the current state law. Mayor Knudsen questioned if it was actually state law, and what the criteria for the Village then should be.

 

  1. Award Contract – Vehicle Emergency Equipment – Police, Fire and Emergency Services Departments

 

Ms. Mailander stated that there were two companies that picked up plans, and one bid package was received. The sole bidder is Regional Communications, Inc. The bid was structured so that prices were obtained for each individual service. Regional submitted a complete bid package, therefore it is recommended that the Village go with Regional Communications. The Village has worked with them in the past and they have been the successful supplier for the past two years.

 

  1. State Contract Purchase – Finance Department Carpet Replacement

 

Ms. Mailander stated that in the Finance Department, third floor conference room, and elevator are the original carpets from thirteen years ago. They are proposing to go under State Contract with Brother’s Carpet and Flooring in Hackensack in the amount of $14,068. The funds are in a current capital account for this removal and installation of new carpet.

 

  1. Quarterly Financial Report

 

Mr. Rooney stated that this quarterly financial report was for four months since the budget was adopted until May 4th. Explanation was provided along the right side for any areas where deviation that was significant from 33% of the budget. In the revenue stream, a lot of it is the timing of billings as a lot of the Village revenues are generated through mid-year billings. There are a number of things that are fully realized in terms of revenues, those are grant programs and that money is in the Village already so it is just a matter of classifying it as 100%.

General fund revenues show the greatest fluctuation under administrative charges and vehicle fees for Police and outside services. That is seasonal as there is not as much roadwork being done in the bad weather so there is no opportunity to bill third parties for services that the Police report on. Chief Luthcke and Mr. Rooney went through the timing compared to last year and they are on track with that. The Village has had the ability to realize about 50% of its tax liabilities and revenue stream because of the prepaid taxes that were made at the end of the year.

In terms of appropriations, most if not all of the other expenses are about encumbrances. The Department Directors have not had the opportunity to encumber funds because the budget wasn’t adopted yet, so there is less that 33% on those items but it is similar to what the Village had last year.

Councilman Voigt questioned whether Mr. Rooney could go over the administrative charges. Mr. Rooney stated that it was compared to last year where there was the same scenario with not as much road work being done during the winter months. When road work begins, these are on a cash basis so they have to be billed and by the time it is collected it is the end of June and there is a significant jump at that point.

Councilman Hache questioned the Cablevision franchise tax of over $368,000. Mr. Rooney stated that was a franchise fee that Cablevision pays to the Village on an annual basis in accordance with franchise agreements.

Mr. Rooney moved onto the Water Utility Fund, and stated that revenue was down because of weather as there has been a lot of rain and people don’t use as much water. Expenses on the appropriations side, encumbrances could not have been made until the budget was adopted and that will grow.

Mr. Rooney stated that Parking revenues were on track, however there was a bit of seasonal activity there. He added that he was comfortable with that, and on the appropriations side there were encumbrances that were not put into place for other expenses. A full time PEO hasn’t come on board yet, so that is a reason for the salary being lower than 33% of the budget.

Councilman Voigt questioned whether Mr. Rooney could break out what was Parkmobile versus coin. Mr. Rooney stated that he would send a summary of the breakdown to Councilman Voigt.

 

  1. Award State Contract – 2018 Chevy Tahoe SUV – Fire Department

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this was the award under State Contract for a 2018 Chevy Tahoe SUV to replace a 2006 Ford Expedition. The Tahoe is in this year’s capital account and is $34,695.68. The contractor is Hertrich Fleet Services, Inc. of Delaware. The 2018 Chevy Tahoe will be used by the fire inspection bureau, to transport personnel and equipment to emergency scenes, and transport personnel to firefighting classes. The 2006 Ford Expedition will be sold on GovDeals.com.

 

  1. Proposed Ordinance for Hillcrest Road Streetscape Project

 

  1. Proposed Ordinance for North Pleasant Avenue Streetscape Project

 

Ms. Mailander stated that the proposed ordinance for the Hillcrest Road streetscape project and the proposed ordinance for North Pleasant Avenue streetscape project were 100% funded through NJDOT grants which were received for each of these projects. The plan is to introduce these ordinances at the July 1 reorganization meeting and adopt them at the July 18 public meeting. This will get the funding in place so the Village can move forward with these streetscape projects.

Councilman Voigt questioned what the Village was doing for the streetscapes. Ms. Mailander stated that it included curbs and sidewalks. Mr. Rutishauser stated that the projects includes re-surfacing the road, minor drainage work when necessary, replacement of curbs that are past their useful lifespan, driveway aprons, addition of walking crosswalks, and the planting of street trees where applicable.

 

  1. Policy

 

  1. Public Health Nuisance Code

 

According to Chapter 52, Public Health Practice Standards of Performance for local boards of Health, will conduct a public health nuisance program to include the investigations of Public Health Nuisances. In 2005 the Village adopted certain sections of the Public Health Nuisance code, however it did not adopt the section regarding the depositing of matter which serves as food for insects or rodents or which constitutes a breeding place or harborage for insects or rodents. Dawn Cetrulo is suggesting that the Village adopts this now as there were some issues with rodents that were being fed. This would not include bird feeders, they would only be included if the ground or the area beneath the birdfeeder were not cleaned up. This could be anything that would harbor insects.

Deputy Mayor Sedon asked whether this would impact anyone who would like to do backyard composting. Ms. Mailander stated that it would be alright to compost so long as they cleaned up and maintained the compost appropriately.

 

  1. Ban on Plastic Bags

 

Elle Gruber and Lisa Somers introduced themselves as members of the Ridgewood Environmental Advisory Committee (REAC). Ms. Gruber stated that last time they were before the Council they presented their idea and they served the Chamber of Commerce and the Ridgewood Guild. Ms. Somers thanked the Council for asking for a progress report and added that they were happy that there was openness to considering a bag ban as this is a growing trend in Europe, the United States, in quite a few towns. Just to set a context, not all bag bans are alike, there is room for devising what makes sense for the community. The typical formula is one in which the supermarkets and some retailers are not allowed to provide single use plastic bags, they are required to provide, if necessary, biodegradable paper bags and at a cost to the customer of five cents, but it could be ten cents.

Ms. Somers stated that what they have done since they were last before the Council, they created a survey for the business community and met with the Chamber and Guild, and they were very supportive and thought it was a wonderful idea and were happy to forward the survey to the members. So far, there was one concern that was voiced from a restaurant regarding take home food and leakage, and so Ms. Gruber checked with people in states where there are successful bans and was told that is a problem that is not insurmountable. Usually a cardboard box is given for food with a paper bag, and the cost is added to the bill.

Ms. Somers stated that they looked at other bag ban laws, and Teaneck has a law that will go into effect in July. It does not ban single use bags, it requires that a store may not offer one but if asked then there is a charge. In her opinion that is somewhat of a deterrent to people using plastic bags, but frankly there are a lot of communities out there that are doing better with their laws. Ms. Gruber checked with Stop and Shop headquarters in Massachusetts, where there are now 30 towns that have enacted bag bans, and they report no problem at all with this ban.

Ms. Somers stated that Ridgewood would not be reinventing the wheel, as there are a lot of really good models that it could follow. There are states and municipalities that have been doing it long enough that there is a guide for how to do this, and there is evidence that it is very effective and has an impact on consumer behavior. They are anticipating that there will be some concerns once there is an effort to create a bag ban. Ms. Somers stated that one of the things they are anticipating is people who might say they should up the pressure on people to recycle bags. Regarding that approach, increasing the opportunity for recycling bags can be done but you are not addressing the extraordinary amount of fossil fuels that are used to produce these bags and the fact that we know that any time there is a recycling program that the recycling stream is only getting a fairly small percentage of the number of recyclable items that you are trying to capture.

Ms. Somers stated that their feeling is that this is not going to be without some concerns. Nonetheless the governing body is responsible for the laws that will protect the environment. The statistics around plastic bags are stark and horrible, as there are a trillion of these bags produced annually across the globe. One hundred billion of these bags are in the United States, with 12 billion barrels of oil used to produce these bags. It takes 500 years for one plastic bag to degrade. Ms. Somers stated that the feeling at REAC is that it is way past time, and it would be a really fantastic and exciting opportunity for Ridgewood to be one of the leaders in doing the right thing.

Councilman Voigt questioned what the next steps were. Ms. Gruber stated that the next step is an education program, they would put out some information. She added that the stores like it when you bring your own bags shopping, as Kings and Whole Foods offer money back. Mayor Knudsen stated that with adding the carousel at the checkout for the plastic bags, Stop and Shop has created a deterrent to bringing her own bags. Ms. Gruber stated that Monmouth County passed an ordinance this week. She stated that hopefully in a few months they would be ready to introduce an ordinance. Councilman Voigt asked if Ms. Gruber could provide a copy of the Monmouth County ordinance.

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that the Council would put together an ordinance based on what was discovered from various outreach and education. This would all be compiled into a list of what they are looking for, and craft an ordinance out of that. It would be an effort that could come to fruition in the fall or winter.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that Suffolk County, New York, as of January 1, 2018 started this law. The grocery store in the town where she has a summer home has a five cent charge per bag and have said that it has had absolutely no impact as people don’t care about paying for the bag. In this instance, their ban isn’t working. Ms. Gruber compared this to the Teaneck ordinance. Ms. Somers stated that this is unlike other models where plastic is not available. Ms. Gruber stated that the objection from Kings was that it costs them money for the plastic bags. Councilwoman Walsh stated that the consumer doesn’t care about paying the five cents. The challenge is the education and how to change the behavior. The places that have had the most success include a major educational push as well as not providing plastic bags so people really understand why they are not getting plastic bags.

Councilman Hache stated that if there is no impact the stores don’t complain because they are making money on the bags. Councilwoman Walsh stated that it was a reusable plastic bag that is being used in Suffolk County. Ms. Gruber stated that in Maine at the vegetable stand you get a reusable plastic bag which she has been using for over a year. Mayor Knudsen stated that they should try to gauge the public sentiment. Councilman Hache stated that they could team up with the CBDAC possibly to hold an educational forum. Mayor Knudsen recommended going out to social media and putting the information out there.

 

  1. Operation

 

  1. Authorizing Age Friendly Application for the AARP Community Grant

 

Ms. Mailander stated that Age Friendly Ridgewood has proposed to apply for a grant to purchase two solar powered pedestrian crosswalk warning signs for the Village. This is similar to the crosswalk warning signs by Graydon Pool. They would like to place one at the mid-block crosswalk on North Maple Avenue from the Library to the Kings Shopping Center and another possibly on Franklin Avenue at one of the intersections there.

 

  1. Amend Designated Individuals to Issue Notices on Dead Trees

 

Ms. Mailander stated that there have been a lot of storms this winter and spring and looking at the current language in the code it doesn’t permit the Code Enforcement Officer to send notices to residents on tree hazards. This would add to the ordinance so they can enforce by sending notices. It would include the Village’s Code Enforcement Officer, Parks and Recreation Department, the Engineering Division, in addition to the current one which includes Police and/or Fire. It also adds the Village’s Code Enforcement Officer, Parks and Recreation Department, and the Engineering Division to those who can enforce this chapter, which also includes the Police and Fire Department, the Construction Officer and Village Sanitation.

 

  1. Authorization to Join U.S. Communities Cooperative Purchasing Program

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this was cooperative purchasing and pricing. One of the Village’s principle suppliers of electrical materials is on this cooperative, so it will be an excellent way for the Village to obtain equipment and parts needed that have been competitively bid.

  1. REVIEW OF JUNE 13, 2018 PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

 

Ms. Mailander stated that this was a review of the June 13, 2018 Public Meeting Agenda.

Proclamation to Recognize the 60th Anniversary of Kasschau Memorial Shell.

Resolution for Ridgewood Water: Award Professional Services Contract – Water Rate Study.

The following ordinances are scheduled for public hearing: 3639 – Amend Chapter 212-31 – Skate Park Rules and Regulations; 3646 – Establish Valet Parking Area on North Broad Street; 3647 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Establish Regulations for Blade Signs in Central Business District; 3648 – Amend Chapter 172-6 – Nuisances Enumerated – Bands and Music; and 3649 – Redevelopment Plan – Block 3809, Lots 12 & 13 – Hudson Street Parking Lot.

Resolutions include: Waive Fourth of July Vendor Fees; Grant Permission to Fireworks Company for Fireworks Display; Reject Bids – School Bus Transportation – Summer Day Camp; Title 59 Approval – School Bus Transportation – Summer Day Camp; Award Contract – School Bus Transportation; Title 59 Approval – Vehicle Emergency Equipment – Police, Fire, and Emergency Services; Award Contract under State Contract – Carpet Replacement – Police Department; Award Contract under State Contract – Carpet Replacement – Finance Department; Award Contract under State Contract – 2018 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV – Fire Department; Award Professional Services Contract – Phase 1 Archaeological Study – Schedler Property; Authorize Snow Plowing Agreement with Bergen County; Extend Suspension of Ordinance for Certain Illuminated Signs in Central Business District; Authorize Encroachment Agreement – ADDRESS; Authorize Mailing of Estimated 2018 Third Quarter Tax Bills; Authorize Joining U.S. Communities Cooperative Purchasing Program; Authorize Joining Somerset County Cooperative Pricing; Authorize Director of Parks and Recreation to Sign Certain Seasonal Contracts; Authorize Application to AARP Community Grant for Age Friendly Ridgewood – Pedestrian Safety Improvements; Extend Non-Enforcement of Electronic Signs in Windows of the Central Business District; Endorse Application for Bergen County Historic Preservation Grant for James Rose Center; Authorize Settlement of Claim; and Approve 2018-2019 Renewals of Liquor Licenses.

  1. MANAGERS REPORT

Open House – Ms. Mailander stated that on Monday, June 11th at 8:30 P.M. there would be an Open House in the Court Room to view plans for the Hudson Street Parking Garage. Representative from Epic Management, Tim Haahs, and Bohler Engineering. Mr. Rooney will also be present. Anyone interested in the project is invited to come and take advantage of this opportunity.

Village Council Reorganization – Ms. Mailander stated on Sunday, July 1st at noon the Village Council Reorganization Meeting would be taking place in the Court Room.

 

Village Council Work Session – Ms. Mailander stated that the Village Council Work Session for June 20th has been cancelled.

Graydon Pool – Ms. Mailander stated that Graydon Pool opened last Saturday and is open seven days a week from now until Labor Day. Memberships and daily passes can be purchased by residents at the pool office, full hours are weekdays from noon to 7:30 P.M. and weekends from 10:00 A.M. to 7:30 P.M.

Ridgewood Guild’s “Music in the Night” – Ms. Mailander stated that showcase began June 1st and will continue in front of several participating restaurants every Friday night through the end of August.

Kasschau Shell – Ms. Mailander stated that the Kasschau Shell opens its season on Thursday, June 7th with ‘Tunes in June’ with various groups from Ridgewood High School. On Thursday, June 14th, there will be a 60th Anniversary celebration for the Kasschau Shell, with a performance by the Ridgewood Choral, which was the group which performed at the first performance at Kasschau Shell in June of 1958, where there were 3,500 people in attendance.

Movies in the Park – Ms. Mailander stated that Movies in the Park sponsored by the Ridgewood Guild will start June 13th at Memorial Park at Van Neste Square.   The movie will be ‘The Creature from the Black Lagoon,’ which will start at approximately 9:00 P.M. Movies are shown every other Wednesday, and the movies shown during the summer will be big, including ‘LaLaLand,’ ‘Toy Story,’ ‘Mrs. Doubtfire,’ and ‘Planet of the Apes.’

Mayor Knudsen stated that there was a thread on Facebook about the closing of Graydon on Monday due to inclement weather and people showed up later but there was no posting regarding the closure of the pool. Ms. Mailander stated that she would report on this last week so that everyone could be aware as to how it works.

  1. COUNCIL REPORTS

 

Planning BoardCouncilman Voigt stated that the Planning Board met last night for a courtesy review of the Hudson Street Garage along with a presentation by Epic. Epic has done a nice job in thinking through the issues so far. There was a review of the installation of the granular activated carbon system in order to meet EPA Health Advisory Standards. Mayor Knudsen and himself were asked to recuse themselves.

They memorialized a resolution for a minor subdivision at 401 Mountain. There was an approval of the developer’s agreement for The Dayton and Chestnut Village.

 

Gay Pride Flag Raising CeremonyCouncilman Voigt stated that himself and Mayor Knudsen attended the ceremony yesterday at Ridgewood High School, which was a nice presentation put on by the members of the Gay/Straight Alliance. Charlotte Simpson and Sarah Vaccaro did a very nice job. Tom Gordon, Principal, provided some words of wisdom on acceptance of everybody.

 

Gun Violence Awareness Program Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that on June 2nd he and Mayor Knudsen attended the Gun Violence Awareness Program involving the Mothers Demand Action at Memorial Park at Van Neste Square. They then went down to Olive R. Twist to celebrate their Grand Opening and then went to Graydon for the meet and greet on Graydon patio, which was a senior event that was well attended.

RBSA Mayor Knudsen stated that RSBA had their last Special All-Stars Program this past Sunday, and all of the Special Needs children who participated had a t-ball game and received trophies. She thanked Brendan Buckley, Karen Whalen, Jim Albano, and all of the parents and kids who came out from RBSA to assist the children to run the bases and hit the ball. She added that this was a great opportunity for special needs children to participate in sporting events. Mayor Knudsen remembered a friend’s son who had his first opportunity to play organized sports at this RBSA event eleven years ago.

 

Ad-Hoc Committee SuggestionMayor Knudsen stated that a resident suggested an ad-hoc committee be organized to review any potential conflicts of interest for individuals appointed to Boards and Committees. She thought that was an interesting opportunity to better understand what Boards and Committees the appointed members in case they did have any specific conflicts. She stated that it was something they should consider and there should be a form that identified individuals who may have a conflict of interest step away from the entire board or any specific discussions.

 

  1. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that he wanted to follow up on the subject of Graydon and closing Graydon. He stated that it would be nice to have a phone number to call or a place where it could be posted online to determine whether the pool is in fact open or closed.

Mr. Loving stated that Councilwoman Walsh spoke about the bus situation where the middle school had requested charter buses because they wanted air conditioning, comfortable seats, and restrooms. Charter buses don’t have seat belts, but it is mandatory in the State of New Jersey that all school buses have seat belts. He added that having contracted with a company, they should make sure that the Village will be provided with school buses which have more safety features.

Mr. Loving stated that he was upset regarding what he heard about the garage this evening. One of the things was that the life expectancy was said to be thirty years, as he believes that number is very high as it is a pre-fab construction with caulking between the seams which has a life expectancy between 15 and 20 years if you take care of it properly. He added that he would be concerned about entering into any financial arrangement that requires 25 to 30 years to pay if off because the garage may not last that long.

Mr. Loving stated that regarding deferred payments, the Village would pay more if they paid later. He questioned why the Village would want to spend any more if it didn’t have to. He stated that there was also mention of borrowing more to pay off interest, so there would be bonds and then more money borrowed via another process to pay off some interest so there would be two loans, which didn’t make any sense to him at all. He added that it seemed like the rate increase was a done deal, where he thought it was said that a rate increase can amount to nothing more than a tax increase, or another tax and the Village was going to try and avoid that. Mr. Loving stated that he didn’t know here that came from as it is basically another tax, and why would the Village add another tax. It seems as though the Village still hasn’t figured how to pay for this. The last time there was a rate increase it had to be rolled back. He encouraged the Council to slow down and talk about how they planned to pay for it before the Village was in a big financial mess.

Mr. Loving stated that there was a comment made about no design costs and lower construction costs, and cautioned that just because it costs less to build a multi-million dollar house doesn’t mean you should buy it.

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that she and Mr. Loving learned that you can call the Bergen County Mosquito Control and they will come to your house at no charge and they will check your property for mosquito areas and spray BT spores which is a non-pathogenic spore and is non-toxic to humans.

  1. RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

 

Deputy Village Clerk Donna Jackson read Resolution #18-168 to go into Closed Session as follows:

  1. ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Hache, seconded by Deputy Mayor Sedon, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Work Session was adjourned at 11:03 P.M.

______________________________

                                                                                                     Susan Knudsen                            

Mayor                        

______________________________

              Donna M. Jackson

  • Hits: 697

A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOD, NEW JERSEY ON JUNE 6, 2018 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

  1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL

Deputy Mayor Sedon called the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call the following were present: Councilman Hache, Deputy Mayor Sedon, Councilman Voigt, Councilwoman Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen. Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; and Donna M. Jackson, Deputy Village Clerk.

  1. PUBLIC HEARING ON GRANT APPLICATION FOR KINGS POND PARK DEVELOPMENT/PHASE II

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that the proposed improvements to Kings Pond Park included in Phase II of the development plans, which were discussed in the Work Session this evening, are being considered. A Public Hearing on the Phase II improvements is required due to the fact that the Village is submitting a grant application for this project from the Bergen County Open Space Trust Fund. The Public Hearing this evening is specifically on the proposed improvements to Kings Pond Park, Phase II and the Village Council will listen to comments from the public specifically on this matter. The Public Hearing is now open.

Elle Gruber, 229 South Irving Street, thanked the Village Council for their work in understanding how important this beautiful space is. She stated that they want native plants and trees, and added that Ridgewood Wildscape received permission from the Council to do spraying of invasive plants. So, they were trying to get a DEP authorized company to get in there soon, and she didn’t know if this was going to interfere because cutting down Knotweed doesn’t do anything unless it is treated because it loves to be cut down. The DEP would treat it a certain way by cutting it down and treating the roots.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she didn’t believe it interfered, but asked Ms. Bigos to come up and speak about this. Ms. Bigos stated that what she understood in working with the Village Engineer is that all of the work that is being done regarding the invasive Japanese Knotweed is going to be sprayed. It was through the Kings Pond Quest and the Wildscape where it says to bring the sheers and cut down the Knotweed at the trail entrance. Ms. Bigos agreed that it would be treated after being cut down.

George Shabet, 334 Lakeview Drive, stated that for the last 20 years no Council has done anything except this one, and he wanted to thank the Village Council as last week there was a meeting with the neighbors and the committee. He added that the neighbors were very pleased with the committee’s commitment and willingness to move ahead. Looking at Phase I, he said it was an excellent way to prepare the area for what was to come. Phase II was mainly cosmetic and did nothing to enhance the pond itself. Mr. Shabet stated that the park name is Kings Pond Park and so he was suggesting that somewhere in between Phase I and Phase II that somehow funds can be diverted to dredge the pond which is currently looking at its worst. He suggested methods to divert funds, and asked that the Council put in an effort to dredge the pond.

Robert Peacock, 252 Lakeview Drive, thanked the Village Council as he was here 23 years in the Village and the pond was dredged 20 plus years ago. He stated that when it was dredged, the material was placed in the field and left to dry. He shared that his concern was for the tractors and trucks that could disturb the area. Mr. Peacock stated that they have enjoyed the area with fishing and kayaking. Ten years ago, the High School ice hockey team practiced there for two winters. He added that currently it doesn’t freeze as it is currently runny and full of muck so it doesn’t freeze well. Lake Street Brook was fixed 8-10 years ago, and the Engineers said that it would help things as there was a better path for the water to come through, but residue is still there from that construction project and has never cleared. Mr. Peacock stated that he was pleased that the project was moving forward, and a lot of wildlife was coming back. He asked that if the opportunity was there to dredge it should be done between Phase I and Phase II.

Deputy Mayor Sedon moved the Public Hearing be closed. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

  1. PUBLIC HEARING ON GRANT APPLICATION FOR ZABRISKIE-SCHEDLER HOUSE/PHASE III

Deputy Mayor Sedon stated that the proposed improvements to the Zabriskie-Schedler House/Phase 3, which will include additional word required to be done on the house so that it can be opened to the public, which were discussed in the Work Session this evening, are being considered. A Public Hearing on the Phase 3 improvements to the Zabriskie-Schedler House is required due to the fact that the Village is submitting a grant application for this project from the Bergen County Historic Preservation Trust Fund. The Public Hearing this evening is specifically on the improvements to the Zabriskie-Schedler House/Phase 3 and the Village Council will listen to comments from the public specifically on this matter. The Public Hearing is now open.

Elle Gruber, 229 South Irving Street, congratulated the Village Council for what they were doing adding that it was money well spent. She stated that everyone was against The Stable and it is now the most used building. She thanked the Council for all of their hard work in preparing the grants.

Deputy Mayor Sedon moved the Public Hearing be closed. Councilman Hache seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:      None

Mayor Knudsen asked with regards to the dredging, if that was something that the Village Council could work with Ridgewood Wildscape on, as Jeannie Epiphan had some idea on de-snagging versus dredging, so maybe they could coordinate with her as it does make sense that if anything was to be done it would happen before Phase II.

Chris Rutishauser stated that the pond was last dredged just before Hurricane Floyd hit and it was re-dredged after that. To do a dredging project would require permitting with NJDEP as they would need to get a lot of material out, as the work on the Lake Street Bridge probably brought more sediment down. The pond currently doesn’t have significant depth, there are branches and it should be dredged as he didn’t think de-snagging would do much of anything. Mayor Knudsen stated that they should reach out to Ms. Epiphan and coordinate that effort and figure out how it fits into this. Mr. Rutishauser stated that the Village has a partnership with Bergen County Mosquito Control, they have a long reach excavator that is used for dredging. Every year they help with getting Graydon Pool ready for the season and he would reach out and see if they were available to help. Mayor Knudsen asked if there was a particular time that it would be good for the dredging. Mr. Rutishauser stated that it was a good winter job as during the summer it would stink and depending on what is excavated you may have to dewater it on site so that you are not trying to transport the wet material offsite.

  1. RESOLUTION

 

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 18-166 AND 18-167, WERE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY AND READ IN FULL:

 

Councilman Voigt stated that regarding resolution 18-167 he was concerned that there wasn’t a plan in place for potential uses of the site and if he had that information he would be more comfortable voting yes, so he was choosing to abstain.

  1. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, Mayor Knudsen called for a motion to adjourn, on a motion by Deputy Mayor Sedon, seconded by Councilman Hache, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Special Public Meeting was adjourned at 8:25 P.M.

______________________________

                                                                                                     Susan Knudsen                            

Mayor                        

______________________________

         Donna M. Jackson

       Deputy Village Clerk

  • Hits: 2410

COPYRIGHT © 2023 VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD

If you have any trouble with accessing information contained within this website, please contact the MIS Department - 201-670-5500 x2222 or by email mis@ridgewoodnj.net.

Feedback