• Home
  • Clerk Minutes

A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, ON MARCH 23, 2022 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

1.         CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

 

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 8:24 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act.  At roll call the following were present:  Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Sedon, Vagianos, and Mayor Knudsen.  Also present were Eileen Young, Deputy Village Clerk; Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; and Richard Calbi, Director of Ridgewood Water.

 

2.         SCOPING HEARING – GREEN ACRES DIVERSION AT MAPLE AND GRAYDON PARKS

 

Richard Calbi, Director of Ridgewood Water, introduced Chris Colley of Topology, a consultant who is working on the Green Acres application.  The application requires a public scoping hearing for the Linwood replacement well, which is located in a public park listed on the Village’s Recreational and Open Space inventory.  The Linwood replacement well requires a diversion of approximately 100 square feet.  The well is required to be replaced as part of a USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) Administrative Consent Order, with fines incurred if no action is taken.

 

Mr. Colley indicated that he works for a planning firm called Topology, based in Newark, New Jersey.  There will be a public hearing this evening.  Anyone not able to comment this evening will have the opportunity to do so until April 6, 2022.  This is a scoping hearing for a major Green Acres diversion.  The State of New Jersey is very specific about actions which need to take place in the scoping hearing.  Mr. Colley explained that the purpose of this hearing is to accept public comment on a major disposal or diversion of parkland.  The State requires him to explain the scope of the area that is being diverted and the parkland from which it is being diverted, as well as setting forth a compelling public need and benefit and describe any alternatives that were considered in lieu of a diversion.

 

Mr. Colley said that the subject diversion regards the construction of a new well (Linwood Well) located on portions of Maple Park and Graydon Park.  The lands affected by the diversion include approximately 1/100th of an acre of Maple Park and approximately 1/200th of an acre of Graydon Park (Block 239, Lots 1 and 3, respectively).  A portion of that affected area is a subsurface easement, which is required as part of the Linwood Well project.  Mr. Colley will speak about the major element of the diversion, the new well which has already been installed by Ridgewood Water.  There is also a minor diversion, which is the subsurface easement.

 

The areas affected by this project equals approximately 1,466 square feet.  Mr. Colley described both the major and minor diversion areas.  The major diversion equals approximately 100 square feet (the new Linwood well).  This new well supports the existing Linwood well house, which is located south of the new well.  He described the subsurface main which is required for the operation of the new well to connect to the existing well house.  The minor diversion equals approximately 1,366 square feet of subsurface easement. 

 

Mr. Colley explained that the existing Linwood well house was built in the 1930s.  He indicated that there is an Administrative Consent Order by the EPA requiring the Village and Ridgewood Water to make improvements to the existing Linwood well, dealing with changes of standards and changes in water quality.  The Consent Order includes timelines for implementation, which were met by Ridgewood Water.  There is a need for proximity to the existing well, which is why the new well is located on the same parkland.

 

Regarding the public need/benefit, Mr. Colley explained that the replacement well is necessary for Ridgewood Water to continue to service community needs with an adequate supply of quality and compliant drinking water.  Mr. Colley explained that no alternatives exist in light of the Consent Order guidelines established in approximately 2016.  Ridgewood Water had commissioned an alternatives analysis to be performed in 2017.  This analysis considered a variety of different alternatives, such as rehabilitating the existing well house at the current location, drilling a new well within a 50 foot radius, drilling a new well and rehabilitating and relocating the well house elsewhere in the park, converting a different Graydon Pool well into a productive well, or abandoning the Linwood Well.  Mr. Colley explained that alternatives are limited or nonexistent because the well has already been constructed, described by him as an “after the fact diversion.”

 

Mr. Colley spoke about the compensation required to satisfy this diversion.  Given the scale of the diversion, they have engaged in discussions with Green Acres and there will be cash compensation to the Garden State Preservation Trust (GSPT) to resolve these major and minor diversion components.

 

Mr. Colley indicated that written comments (concerning alternative sites or alternative means of satisfying the project objectives) can be submitted to Mr. Calbi at Ridgewood Water, 131 North Maple Avenue, Ridgewood, NJ 07450, or emailed to him at rcalbi@ridgewoodnj.net.  A copy of the email should also be sent to Maude Snyder at Maude.Snyder@dep.nj.gov.  Alternatively, written comments made be mailed to the NJ Department of Environmental Protection, Green Acres Program, Bureau of Legal Services and Stewardship, P.O. Box 420, Mail Code 401-07B, Trenton, NJ 08625-0420, Attention:  Bergen County Steward.  Public comments will be accepted until April 5, 2022.  In addition, a public hearing will be held this evening.

 

Mayor Knudsen asked if the presentation could be posted on the Village website, and Mr. Colley replied in the affirmative.  Mayor Knudsen opened the public hearing on the diversion of Green Acres property.

 

Jim Bosler, 821 Newcomb Road, indicated that he is the Secretary of the Open Space Committee.  He wanted to make some cautionary remarks, due to the fact that there have been problems in the past with diversion issues.  He spoke about the last diversion matter in which the size of the property was miscalculated, below the size needed in order to qualify for State funding.  Mr. Bosler asked if anyone has spoken with Councilwoman Perron or Ralph Curry regarding the specifications of this project, as it relates to a percentage of the total open space available in Ridgewood in order to qualify for funds.

 

Mayor Knudsen spoke about the last diversion issue (which was discovered accidentally) in which the process was not followed correctly and a public hearing was never held.  She felt that the process followed this evening was very different from the way the last diversion issue was handled, and she asked Mr. Rogers for confirmation that the diversion issue for the Linwood Well was handled in a correct procedural way. 

 

Mr. Rodgers spoke about the last diversion issue in which the Village had difficulty locating an appropriate property to satisfy the diversion, which is one of the reasons it took so long to resolve.  He indicated that the Linwood Well project is much different, and it appeared that the correct procedure has been followed by bringing the matter before the Village Council and conducting both a scoping hearing and public hearing.  He did not foresee the Linwood Well diversion issue taking as long as the other diversion issue.


Councilwoman Perron remarked that there is a distinguishing factor between the Linwood Well diversion and the older diversion, whereby the Administrative Consent Order of the EPA mandated Ridgewood Water to replace the well.  Mayor Knudsen asked why the original Linwood Well had been closed.  Mr. Calbi replied that it was closed due to the age of the well, since it malfunctioned over time.  The well pump was stuck in the well and could not be removed, so the existing well had to be abandoned and a new well drilled.  Councilwoman Perron thanked Topology for this clarifying presentation.

 

There were no further public comments and Mayor Knudsen moved that the public hearing be closed.  Councilwoman Reynolds seconded the motion.

 

 

 

Roll Call Vote

AYES:          Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Sedon, Vagianos; Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:         None

ABSENT:    None

ABSTAIN:   None

 

3.         ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Deputy Mayor Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Perron, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Work Session was adjourned at 8:42 P.M. and the Public Work Session was reconvened.

 

 

                                                                                                                                                           

                                                                                                Susan Knudsen

                                                                                                                     Mayor

 

 

 

                                                                       

Eileen Young

Deputy Village Clerk

  • Hits: 558

A REGULAR PUBLIC WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, ON MARCH 2, 2022 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

1.         CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon called the meeting to order at 7:34 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act.  At roll call the following were present:  Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Sedon, and Vagianos.  Mayor Knudsen arrived at 8:15 P.M.  Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Eileen Young, Deputy Clerk; and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney.

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.  There was a moment of silence for all men and women serving our nation and all people suffering through war and terrible times.

 

2.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Douglas Goodell, 234 Mulberry Place, complimented Councilman Vagianos, Mayor Knudsen, and Attorney Matthew Rogers for their efforts on behalf of the Barnett/Mulberry/First Street neighborhood, addressing the issues raised by the Ho-Ho-Kus Crossing development.  He said that they stepped up at the 11th hour to get involved so that they could understand the situation and possibly mitigate the matter.  He called their efforts “valiant” and he was sure that all neighbors appreciated their efforts.

 

Mr. Goodell explained that he was speaking about a high-density, mixed-use development being built on Ridgewood’s border with Ho-Ho-Kus at First Street and Maple Avenue.  Much of the development is four stories high, including retail space and 67 apartments, with the only egress being via First Street.  Some elements in this development are very good and will benefit the community; however, Mr. Goodell stated that other elements are highly detrimental to the neighborhood and do not belong adjacent to a single-family residential zone, which was both recognized and ignored by the developer and the Ho-Ho-Kus Zoning Board.

 

Mr. Goodell indicated that the development was expanded in 2020 when Ho-Ho-Kus designated the properties as areas in need of redevelopment pursuant to New Jersey LRHL (Local Redevelopment and Housing Law) guidelines.  However, in September of 2019, the Borough of Ho-Ho-Kus approved a private effort to develop these properties.  Mr. Goodell explained that this was “curious” because a fundamental characteristic of LRHL statutes is their intent to deal with areas “not likely to be ameliorated by private effort.” 

 

Mr. Goodell asked if Ho-Ho-Kus’s efforts to restructure its zoning and make this a redevelopment area were known to Ridgewood officials.  He queried how an area slated for private development fit into the statute’s intentions, i.e., in areas where private development was unlikely.  He wondered if this constituted “misuse” of the statutes.  They have tried unsuccessfully to recommend and implement changes to this proposed development.

 

Ann Melone, 134 Foster Terrace, thanked the Village Council for placing the issue of hybrid access on the agenda this evening.  She advocates for its adoption.  As a member of the League of Women Voters, and as an individual, she stated that she retired after a rewarding career in education and hoped to become more involved in community life.  Unfortunately, an injury, in addition to her post-polio condition, limits her mobility.  When Covid hit and Zoom meetings and hybrid access proliferated, she saw the world “open up.”  Ms. Melone indicated that restoring hybrid access at this time would allow her and many others to fully participate in Village government. 

 

Over the 40 years that she has lived in Ridgewood, Ms. Melone has seen Ridgewood grow from a sedate suburb into a diverse and dynamic Village due to progressive Village Councils and the amazing young families who have moved to Ridgewood.  She stated that Ridgewood is a community with a “great big heart.”  From Jamboree to the HealthBarn Foundation, to the Village’s outstanding commitment to special education, as well as the sponsorship of ACCESS Weekend and the new housing for special needs individuals, Village residents show that they care.  She is proud that Ridgewood was one of the first towns to fly the rainbow flag and that Ridgewood hosts an annual Pride Day.

 

Ms. Melone urged the Village Council to not move backwards but to proceed forward towards full participation for all in Village government through hybrid access.  She urged the adoption of hybrid access because she doesn’t know how many more times she can get her husband to drive her to meetings.

 

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, indicated that she was very happy to see that the topic of hybrid meetings was placed on the agenda, and she appreciates that Councilman Vagianos pushed for it to be on the agenda.  She indicated that she was not going to repeat her reasons for why she is in favor of hybrid access, because she has already done so, but stated that for those Councilmembers who are steadfastly opposed to reinstating hybrid access, she stated that it is “okay” for them to change their minds.  She said that sometimes people are very sure of something and then, if they change their mind, it can turn out very well.  Ms. Loving said that 40 years ago, she knew a handsome young man who was unequivocally not going to get married; however, he did change his mind and she’s pretty sure he hasn’t regretted it.  She urged the Village Council to unanimously approve the reinstatement of hybrid access.

 

Joan Ficke, 396 West End Avenue, indicated that she supported the “notion” of hybrid access, both professionally and personally.  She indicated that she “could not imagine” the Village Council conducting business without the full participation of the citizens in the community.  She thanked the Village Council for putting the hybrid access issue on the agenda and urged them to approve the reinstatement of hybrid access so that healthy discussion and the democratic process can be promoted.

 

Kathryn Schmidt, 123 South Irving Street, said she was speaking about two issues this evening, the first one dealing with safety.  She has had many discussions with Village officials and administration concerning safety for years.  About seven years ago, she pointed out the dangerousness of the intersection of Broad Street and Ridgewood Avenue because she is always “totally confused” about what to do when she is traveling through that intersection.  At that time, she suggested that a four-way stop sign be installed.  When she raised this issue, the response she got was, “There are not a lot of accidents at that intersection, so it’s not necessarily something we would do.”

 

Ms. Schmidt said that she received another comment from the Village approximately 20 years ago after an unfortunate accident occurred where a young girl was killed on Meadowbrook Avenue because, among other reasons, there was no stop sign there.  When she asked members of the Village Council and administration why that was the case, she was told, “Well, you can’t put a stop sign on every corner.”  She is aware that there are many case studies dealing with similar situations, but she took that answer to mean that not every intersection can be mitigated.  She said that she disagrees with that answer and that ways need to be found to be proactive about safety.  For these reasons, Ms. Schmidt requests that the Village Council be more proactive with safety issues and not wait until accidents happen before doing something about it.

 

Ms. Schmidt said she also wanted to speak about hybrid meetings.  She stated that once hybrid access is reinstated, the Village Council may be harangued with comments from people who can’t hear, people who can’t log in, people who can’t see the picture clearly, etc.  Regardless of these things, which are inevitably going to happen, Ms. Schmidt thinks that reinstating hybrid access is the “right thing to do” in the interest of even greater transparency, inclusion, engagement, participation, and openness.  She also encouraged the use of “closed captions.”  She is very happy that this issue is on the agenda this evening and she urged the Village Council to approve hybrid access.

 

Evan Weitz, 423 Oak Street, stated that he is speaking this evening in favor of democracy as well as hybrid access.  He said that the Village Council should make it easier for all Village residents to have access to meetings so they can observe how their local government is run.  He doesn’t understand why the Village Council is making it so hard for people to attend these meetings virtually and participate in Village government.  He mentioned people with young children who cannot get sitters, as well as disabled and elderly residents who have difficulty physically attending meetings.  Even with Covid abating, there are still residents who are “Covid sensitive.” He said that working families need to balance commuting time with civic involvement. 

 

Mr. Weitz repeated that he couldn’t understand why the Village Council would prevent its residents from participating in their local government.  He mentioned that the Board of Education offers hybrid access and that “Corporate America” has become accustomed to hybrid meetings.  He strongly urged the Village Council to increase access to democracy and approve the hybrid model.

 

Matthew Lindenberg, 165 Claremont Road, stated that he was speaking about two issues on the agenda, the first being the issue of dining corrals.  He stated that dining corrals have been one of the positive things arising from the Covid pandemic.  He called the dining corrals and pedestrian malls “a renaissance of al fresco dining.”  He encouraged the Village Council to continue to support dining corrals.

 

Mr. Lindenberg stated that he also wanted to address the issue of hybrid meetings.  He said that he wasn’t trying to convince any of the Councilmembers of anything.  He said that the “lines are drawn” and are very clear.  He urged the community and those watching the meeting at home to listen very carefully and pay attention.  He said two Councilmembers have a progressive view of hybrid access, open government, transparency, as well as the ability to involve people who are concerned about disease, who are disabled, and who have busy lives.

 

Mr. Lindenberg also stated that people will also hear two or three Councilmembers talk about expenses or technical difficulties regarding hybrid access; however, Mr. Lindenberg stated that both of these excuses have been “debunked” by Village staff.  Another reason may be “losing control of meetings,” something else which has been debunked, and a statement that “this is the way it’s always been.”  While he hopes that some Councilmembers have changed their minds, he highly doubts it.  He said that viewers should hold all Village Councilmembers accountable.

 

Anne Burton Walsh, 112 South Irving Street, thanked the Village Council for not cutting the request for the planting and maintenance of trees from the Capital Budget for 2022.  She especially thanked Councilman Sedon for his many years of hard work on this issue. 

 

Ms. Walsh also said that she wanted to read a letter on behalf of Ellie Gruber, addressed to Mayor Knudsen, Councilmembers Sedon, Reynolds, Perron and Vagianos, and Village Manager Mailander:  “As a Ridgewood resident who is often away for parts of the winter, I am writing to urge you to enable hybrid meetings.  I am curious as to the reason you oppose this when, for example, the Board of Education does this.  I do understand that when there’s a large number of letters that have to be read aloud, this puts a burden on the clerk.  But I suggest that you limit comments to either those in person or on the phone.  It is true that the slowing of infections from Covid/Omicron has allowed more open meetings, but there are still residents who cannot drive or attend evening meetings.  We do have a large number of seniors, some of whom have health issues.  We also have some who cannot get around without assistance.  They are also residents, and I believe that you are considerate enough that they be shown consideration.  If residents demand hybrid meetings, they should be willing to either show up in person or call in if they are unable to drive or obtain a ride.  This is participatory government.  As a long-time resident and member of the League of Women Voters, I am dedicated to the principle of educated and informed citizens in government.  We know full well how hard you all work, the burdens put on you to run a Village with many needs.  I am proud to live in Ridgewood.  I am also a scarred veteran of causes that sometimes did not work, but for the most part, you and past Councils and Managers have made our town one of the best in the nation.  For some reason, hybrid meetings have been a point of contention and I do look to you to find a solution.  Perhaps the suggestion that only call-in comments, plus in-person comments, in order to limit the burden on the Village Clerk will be a good compromise.  Thank you, Ellie Gruber.”

 

Siobhan Crann Winograd, 274 Ivy Place, said that she was very excited to see hybrid meetings on the agenda.   She thanked Councilmembers Perron and Vagianos for pushing to have this issue placed on the agenda.  She stated that she was also grateful to the members of the League of Women Voters for their support of hybrid access. 

 

Ms. Crann Winograd indicated that one of her father’s favorite quotes was, “When much is given, much is expected.”  She stated that the Village Council has given a lot, and the public expects much.  She acknowledged that it is an enormous responsibility to govern a Village with a large budget.  She doesn’t understand why the Village Council doesn’t want “help” and why there has been a perception that the podium is a place to complain rather than to provide solutions.  She stated that it is perplexing to her, and also to the older and newer residents in Ridgewood, why the Village Council will not allow hybrid access.

 

Ms. Crann Winograd spoke about possible objections to hybrid access.  She mentioned the comment made by Councilman Vagianos about how much it would cost the Village to provide hybrid access.  She stated that when this cost is “dollarized” per citizen, it amounts to a quarter per person per year to allow access to local government, to make a commitment to aging citizens or working parents.  She said that the cost seems worth it.  She again thanked everyone who got this issue put on the agenda and that everyone is expecting the Councilmembers to vote yes.

 

Bob Fuhrman, 49 Clinton Avenue, stated that he also wanted to address the issue of hybrid meetings.  He said that many people have expressed reasons why hybrid access would be beneficial to certain individuals and he didn’t want to be repetitive.  He said that if the Village wants to encourage active government participation, then the hybrid meetings should be approved.  He said that, due to Covid, many people have engaged in Zoom meetings and taught classes online, and “it works.”  He said that if Councilmembers are not interested in seeing residents participate, then they will vote no.  Mr. Fuhrman said that residents should pay attention as to who votes yes and who votes no.

 

Randy Carson, 817 East Ridgewood Avenue, said that he is also in favor of hybrid meetings.  On another subject, he mentioned that he wanted to talk about the dining corrals.  He said that it would be extremely disappointing if the Village Council voted to remove the dining corrals because restaurants have paid for the parking spots for the entire winter with no one sitting outside.  Restaurants paid for the spots for the entire winter believing that they would be able to have the spots from April to October (after the current rental expires on March 31), which would enable them to recoup the money spent during the winter months when they had very few customers who utilized outdoor dining.

 

Mr. Carson said he could only think of two reasons why the corrals would be removed, and one reason was the loss of parking spots.  He stated that this wasn’t the case.  The lot on Walnut Street is rarely full and the lot on Chestnut Street is full “here and there” but mostly never full.  The only times he has seen these lots full is at night and on weekends.  This leads him to believe that restaurants are “driving” spots in town and encouraging visitors to come to Ridgewood.

 

Another reason for possible removal is because they are an eyesore.  Mr. Carson stated that a local artist has painted the barriers and they look a little nicer, but it is difficult for restaurants to invest money to enhance their space when they are operating on “three month approvals.”  Businesses have spent a lot of money to combat the Covid pandemic, and Mr. Carson said that they cannot keep spending money on “enhancement” with the corrals facing an uncertain future.

 

Mr. Carson stated that restaurants have paid top dollar every spring and winter during peak demand for outdoor furniture, heaters, etc., but they never know until the last minute whether or not the Village Council will approve the existence of the dining corrals.  If restaurant owners knew in advance what the Village Council planned to do, then they can be better prepared.  Restaurants may appear to be busy and coming back strong, but the cost of business is out of control.  Prices for food, payroll, and general supplies are “going through the roof.” 

 

Mr. Carson said that to deny the restaurants the ability to have the corrals because they “look busy” and appear to be fine is not fair.  He stated that times are tough.  He said that he would never have committed his life to this industry if he knew it was going to be this hard.  However, he stated that they will continue to “fight” through this and continue to make the Village proud, but they cannot do it without the Village’s help.

 

Rebecca Rubenstein, 201 Woodland Avenue, stated that she is a Trustee of the Ridgewood Library and is very active with the Friends of the Ridgewood Library, one of its fundraising organizations.  Ms. Rubenstein wanted to inform the Village Council and the public about some upcoming events and initiatives. 

 

The Honor Roll Reading Marathon is a fundraiser held throughout the month of February, for all Ridgewood students in preschool through eighth grade, and raises funds for the purchase of books and development of programming for children and teens.  Ms. Rubenstein stated that students are encouraged to log in and submit their reading accomplishments; in turn, they will receive a coupon for a free Ben ‘N Jerry’s ice cream cone or, for those in middle school, to be entered into a raffle to receive a pair of Apple AirPods.  Ms. Rubenstein indicated that an exciting finale event for the Reading Marathon will be held at the Library on Saturday, March 12, 2022 called “Star Wars Day,” with activities for all ages throughout the day.  For more information, interested residents can log in to RidgewoodLibrary.org. 

 

Ms. Rubenstein announced that the Friends of the Ridgewood Library is hosting their next Author Luncheon event on Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at Seasons Catering in Washington Township.  This year’s guest author is Yaa Gyasi who wrote the books “Homegoing” and “Transcendent Kingdom.”  After the Author Luncheon was cancelled in 2020 due to Covid and the luncheon in 2021 was held virtually, Ms. Rubenstein said that everyone is looking forward to finally holding the luncheon in person.  Tickets are now on sale at RidgewoodLibrary.org and includes a cocktail hour, seated lunch, book signing, 50/50 raffle, and a Silent Auction with unique items.

 

Ms. Rubenstein stated that the Library has been working hard on its outreach to the public.  New resident packets with information about the Library are being delivered to all new residents, and all Village residents should have received by now the latest newsletter from the Library which highlights events being held at the Library from March through May 2022.  Ms. Rubenstein stated that this represents the Library’s most extensive outreach, with newsletters reaching 8,300 mailboxes in Ridgewood.  This newsletter is sent out four times a year and every resident is invited to join the Library to explore all that they offer.  She thanked the newsletter’s sponsors:  Valley Medical Group, Cathy Entwistle of Morgan Stanley, and Janice Fuhrman of Terri O’Connor Realtors.

 

Ms. Rubenstein thanked the Village Council for all that they do to support the Library.  She stated that when they invest in the Library, they invest in the community.

 

Glenn Carlough, 200 Dayton Street, stated that he is the owner of Steel Wheels Tavern at 51 North Broad Street in Ridgewood.  He echoed Randy Carson’s comments and indicated that he had some additional comments.  He referred to the letter and design proposal for dining corrals which he submitted to the Village Council in October 2021.  Mr. Carlough explained that all restaurant owners have a willingness to beautify and invest in the dining corrals; however, they cannot do that without a guarantee that the dining corrals will be allowed to exist in the future.

 

Mr. Carlough stated that the dining corrals “give 100% occupancy to those parking spaces,” which is hard to come by.  In fact, he suggested that restaurant owners would be willing to pay a premium above whatever revenue the parking spaces would generate, which would represent an additional revenue stream for the Village.  He doesn’t see how this could be viewed as anything but a “positive.”  He said that restaurant owners take up very few spaces; at the peak, the dining corrals took up 22 parking spaces, and now the corrals are “in the teens.” 

 

Mr. Carlough stated that nine days ago, his neighbor at the Lincoln Building (45 North Broad Street) told him that his anchor tenant would like a couple of Mr. Carlough’s parking spaces taken away from the dining corral. Mr. Carlough is now down to three spots from the five he previously had.  He again stated that restaurant owners are willing to work with everyone and have no desire to harm their retail or office building neighbors.  They just want to do the best they can for their businesses and for the general public. 

 

Mr. Carlough said that before the Covid pandemic, the seats that were occupied first in his restaurant in the nice weather were always outside.  He believes that outdoor dining brings people into the Central Business District (CBD) and he would like to think that this benefits everyone, the Village and also retailers from overflow traffic.  Another benefit is that more people can be hired during the warmer months.  Restaurant owners paid for these parking spots during the wintertime, which was not optimal, but it was with the hope that they might be able to continue that through the end of 2022.

 

Boyd A. Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that he fully supports any change in the meeting format of the Village Council that will permit people to participate from home.  It has been suggested that it is always the same people who are “saying this” over and over again.  At tonight’s meeting, he observed faces that he has never seen before come to the podium to speak in support of hybrid access.  Therefore, he said that it is not always the same people who comment on this issue.

 

Mahmud Hamza, 528 Amsterdam Avenue, said that he was speaking on behalf of the Shade Tree Commission.  He thanked the Village Council and especially Deputy Mayor Sedon for their support for the shade trees.  Mr. Hamza mentioned that a friend from Stony Brook visited him in Ridgewood and his first impression was “Wow, what a beautiful Village! You have wonderful trees!”  The trees are not only important for the environment and for the well-being of the citizens of Ridgewood, but are also important in making the Village “special” and to make people want to visit, live, and do business in the Village.  He urged the Village Council to approve the budget for the shade trees.

 

There were no further comments from the public.

 

 

3.         MANAGER’S REPORT

 

Ms. Mailander announced that there has been a huge increase in stolen cars in Ridgewood and, in 100% of the cases, the key fobs were left in the cars.  She urged all residents to not leave their key fobs in their cars.  Cars should be locked and all items should be removed from cars such as wallets, purses, and jewelry because they encourage break-ins and create “crimes of opportunity.”  In 2021, a total of 25 cars were stolen from Ridgewood; in the first two months of 2022, nine cars have already been stolen.  Ms. Mailander wanted everyone to be aware that unless a police officer believes that a violator has committed a crime of the first degree or certain crimes of the second degree, they are not allowed to engage in pursuit driving.  For example, police cannot pursue someone if they steal a car because that is not a violation of the first or second degree.

 

Ms. Mailander said that, previously, car thieves would try to steal cars in the early morning hours, would try to avoid cameras and lights, and would wear dark clothing; however, they are now brazenly stealing cars in broad daylight.  This is a very serious issue.  Glen Rock has coined a phrase, “Lock it or lose it.”  Ms. Mailander once again pleaded with residents to lock their cars and remove their fobs and valuable property.

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that Parks and Recreation will be holding a summer Job Fair for residents aged 16 years and older who are seeking part-time seasonal employment in the Village.  It will be held on March 22, 2022 from 6:30 P.M. to 8:30 P.M.  Job opportunities include working at the summer camp, lifeguarding, badge and security, and possibly some other internships within the Village.  People will also be in attendance to demonstrate to young people how they can write a better resume.  The Ridgewood Parks and Recreation Department has also recently sent out their flyer for spring and summer programs for children and adults, with a wide range of program choices and a list of dates to help with summer planning.

 

The Stable Art Gallery is open weekdays from 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M.  Monthly exhibits display a wide variety of locally created art.  Artist information and guest books are located in the main lobby of The Stable. 

 

On Sunday, April 10, 2022, the Earth Day Fair and Daffodil Festival will be held at Memorial Park in Van Neste Square.

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that for over 70 years, Jamboree has presented an original musical show to raise money for college scholarships.  This year, the shows will be held on March 3, 4 and 5, 2022 at the Benjamin Franklin Middle School.  She announced that the entire Village Council will be participating.

 

Super Science Saturday is presenting its 34th Science Fair event on Saturday, March 5, 2022 from 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M.  The event will be held virtually.  Interested residents should log in to SuperScienceSaturday.org for details and to view the interactive live stream.  It will be presented live and on demand for the entire month of March 2022.

 

Household hazardous waste collection for Bergen County will be held on Saturday, March 12, 2022 from 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. at the Bergen County Utilities Authority at the Foot of Empire Boulevard in Moonachie.  This includes hazardous waste such as aerosol cans, antifreeze, batteries, blacktop sealers, fertilizer, fire extinguishers, gasoline, pesticides, used motor oil, and things of that nature.  It is open only to Bergen County residents, so identification must be shown.

 

The styrofoam densifier at the Recycling Center, which the Village is using on a trial basis, has already been used to densify 30 bags of styrofoam today (March 2, 2022), and there are still over 100 bags of styrofoam waiting to be densified.  She mentioned that this is a great start towards fulfilling a recycling need in the Village.  The recycling is limited to the big styrofoam pieces used for packing.

 

The 2022 tennis and pickleball memberships are on sale and must be renewed from the prior year.  If a yellow membership badge was not issued in 2021, residents must have their picture taken and badge printed for 2022 at The Stable, Monday through Friday, 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M.

 

Hours for the senior bus have increased.  Trips to ShopRite in Wyckoff will take place on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month on a trial basis.  This service is free for all Ridgewood seniors.  Interested residents should contact the Village Manager’s Office to make arrangements for bus transportation.

 

Ms. Mailander urged everyone to sign up for E-notices on the Village website to be kept informed of Village events in a timely manner.  Upcoming Village Council meetings are broadcast live from the Village Hall Courtroom, on the Village website, on FIOS Channel 34, and on YouTube.  Upcoming meetings are scheduled for March 9 and April 13, 2022 (Public Meetings at 8:00 P.M.) and March 23 and April 6, 2022 (Work Sessions at 7:30 P.M.).

 

4.         COUNCIL REPORTS

 

Councilwoman Perron announced that the Green Ridgewood Advisory Committee is gearing up for Earth Day, which will be held at Memorial Park in Van Neste Square on Sunday, April 10, 2022 from 11:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M.  Anyone interested in sponsoring this event or would like to have a table at the event should contact Councilwoman Perron at pperron@ridgewoodnj.net.  She can send the forms to anyone interested.
 
Councilman Vagianos announced that he met with the Fields Committee on Tuesday morning, March 1, 2022.  He stated that it was a “robust” meeting because there are severe issues with the fields in Ridgewood.  As he has reported in the past, due to overuse, the Village is attempting to reseed several fields; as a result, most of Citizens Park and all of Vets Field will be closed until April 15, 2022.  These fields normally open for the spring season on March 7, 2022; however, all games are being rescheduled, with one or two exceptions.  Councilman Vagianos said that there are not enough fields in the Village to accommodate all of the sports teams.  He mentioned that there are numerous people who support the Fields Committee and who are working as hard as possible to be able to reopen these fields.
 

Councilwoman Reynolds indicated that the Planning Board met on March 1, 2022; however, she was at Jamboree practice and could not attend the meeting.  The only item on the agenda at the Planning Board meeting was to memorialize the Resolution regarding the preliminary investigation for the Valley Hospital property as an area in need of redevelopment.  She assumes that this was approved since this item is on the Village Council agenda this evening for discussion.

 

Councilman Sedon announced that the Village budget meetings are concluding.  Monday, March 7, 2022 will be the final meeting.  At that meeting, information will have been received from Bergen County which is necessary in order to set the new tax rate for the Village of Ridgewood.  On Wednesday, March 9, 2022, the Operating and Capital Budgets will be introduced and will be voted on in April 2022.  He thanked everyone who participated in developing these budgets, including his Council colleagues and the Village Manager, since some items had to be cut from the budgets to arrive at a reasonable number.  He said that the public is welcome to attend these budget meetings.

 

5.         DISCUSSION

 

A.        RIDGEWOOD WATER

 

            1.         WATER RATE & PFAS TREATMENT CHARGE

 

Ms. Mailander announced that the Village’s annual proposed increases to the water volume charge and PFAS (Polyfluoralkyl Substances) treatment charge for the Ridgewood Water fee schedule are evaluated each year.  It is developed and evaluated against anticipated revenues.  Howard Woods, a rate expert, has reviewed the proposed increases, including anticipated changes in operating expenditures, debt service, and maintenance of the minimum surplus balance.  The new proposed volume rate is $5.52 per 1,000 gallons, an increase of 16¢ per 1,000 gallons. 

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that the PFAS treatment charge (to meet funding demand for treatment of drinking water) is set according to meter size and is a fixed fee.  Most residents have 5/8” meters and the applicable PFAS charge for that size meter will be $7.06 per quarter.  The new rates will result in a $27.75 annual increase for the average residential customer; $15.04 or 54% of this increase is attributed to the PFAS surcharge increase.  Richard Calbi of Ridgewood Water was in attendance at the meeting this evening to answer any questions.

 

Ms. Mailander announced that Mayor Knudsen arrived at the meeting this evening at 8:15 P.M.

 

                        2.         Award Contract – Annual PFAS Laboratory Analysis Services

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that this item deals with the yearly contract for PFAS laboratory analysis services.  It is the second year of a two-year contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, Aqua Pro-Tech Laboratory of Fairfield, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $82,600.00.  This is being paid from the Water Utility Budget.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked what “GenX” represented.  Mr. Calbi replied that GenX is one of the replacement compounds that was manufactured to replace PFOA.  They are doing this analysis to make sure this compound is not in the drinking water.

 

                        3.         Award Contract – Annual Laboratory Analysis Services

 

Ms. Mailander announced that this item deals with awarding a contract for annual laboratory analysis services for Ridgewood Water.  This is the second year of a two-year contract awarded to the lowest sole responsible bidder, Aqua Pro-Tech Laboratory of Fairfield, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $256,502.00.  This will be paid for out of the Water Utility Budget.

 

When questioned by Councilwoman Perron, Mr. Calbi replied that these services are performed for analysis of anything that is not done in-house.  There are several items which they analyze in their own laboratory, but these are very specific items for which they do not have the proper equipment to analyze in the water.

 

            B.        BUDGET

 

1.         Award Irrigation System Services – Year Two

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that this item represents awarding a contract for year two of a two-year contract for irrigation system services for the Parks and Recreation Department.  This contract was awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, Sprinkler Guy Irrigation of Fair Lawn, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $18,000.00.  This is to be paid for out of the Parks and Recreation Operating Budget.

 

2.         Award Contract under County Contract – Tree Trimming Services – The View at Crest Road

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that this item awards a contract under the Bergen County Cooperative Bid for trimming trees and vegetative growth at The View at Crest Road for the benefit of all.  This was last done in 2018 and should be done approximately every four years so that the trees and vegetation do not become overgrown.  The contracted vendor is Downes Tree Service of Hawthorne, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $7,250.00.  Adjacent neighbors will be notified when these services will be performed, which is anticipated to be completed by May 1, 2022.  These services will be paid for out of the Parks and Recreation Operating Budget.

 

Councilman Vagianos recused himself from this discussion since he has a relationship with Kevin Downes.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked about the statement in the proposal by Downes Tree Service that 35 trees are to be removed, whereas elsewhere it is designated as “trimming of trees.”  Ms. Mailander replied that the work to be performed will consist of both removal and trimming of trees.  On-site evaluation of the trees will be performed as the project continues.  Trees are trimmed behind the rock wall on Crest Road to the level of the wall.  This work was done four years ago at double the price because a crane and other heavy equipment were required to perform the work.  Therefore, it is recommended that this work be performed every four years so that the trees and vegetation do not get out of control and, as a result, people will be able to enjoy The View from Crest Road.  Ms. Mailander mentioned that much of the growth in this area looks like trees, but they are actually weeds.

 

Councilwoman Perron said that she also found the proposal and resolution confusing.  The resolution indicates “dead tree removal” but elsewhere the services are described as “trimming or pruning.”  When she envisions “dead tree removal,” she thinks of removing a tree at ground level.  She also mentioned that the proposal indicates the removal of 35 trees.  She indicated that she needed more clarification if the services performed are to be more than just trimming or pruning.  Ms. Mailander replied that she would obtain further information in this regard before the meeting next week.  She mentioned that some trees will be removed and that some trees will be trimmed.  Ms. Mailander even offered to visit the site with Mr. Rutishauser, Village Engineer, and Councilwoman Perron to view the area.  This was agreeable to Councilwoman Perron.  Mayor Knudsen said that it is important to note that these services have been performed in the past in this area with great success.

 

3.         Declare Surplus – Parks Department

 

Ms. Mailander explained that this deals with declaring surplus property for the Parks Department.  There are equipment items which are no longer needed or are unusable or inoperable (old watering cart, mowers, infield grooming equipment, turf seed boxes, leaf blower, stump grinder, turf edger, paint machine, power broom, and lifeguard boats which are leaking and unsafe).  If this property is declared surplus, it will be posted on govdeals.com, an online auction site.

 

            D.        POLICY

 

1.         Designating The Valley Hospital Property as an Area in Need of Redevelopment

 

Mayor Knudsen announced that the Planning Board approved and recommended to the Village Council that The Valley Hospital property be designated as an area in need of redevelopment.  Mr. Rogers advised that a letter first needs to be received by the Village Council from the Planning Board memorializing this recommendation, which is anticipated to be received shortly, before the Village Council can approve an Ordinance to designate this property as an area in need of redevelopment.  It will be placed on the agenda at the next scheduled Work Session, with adoption of the Ordinance in April 2022. 

 

Mr. Rogers remarked that this issue emanates out of the settlement agreement with The Valley Hospital lawsuit and is incorporated into the Village’s Fair Share Housing Plan.  He said that he would forward any pertinent documents to the newer Councilmembers for their review so that they can familiarize themselves with this matter.

 

2.         Dining Corrals

 

Ms. Mailander said that the Village Council adopted a Resolution in December 2021 which extended the use of the dining corrals in the CBD through March 31, 2022.  At this time, the Village Council must decide whether to continue the use of the dining corrals or eliminate their use.  The cost of the dining corrals has been $250.00 per parking space per month.

 

Councilman Vagianos indicated that he needed to recuse himself from this discussion.

 

Mayor Knudsen acknowledged the feedback which the Village Council has received from the public and business owners.  The dining corrals are not maintained the way the Village had anticipated.  Mayor Knudsen said that the dining corrals are messy, a lot of trash and leaves have collected around the corrals, and they are taking a lot of valuable parking spaces away from neighboring retail business owners.  Mayor Knudsen feels that the dining corrals should be eliminated and the CBD returned to normal.

 

Councilwoman Perron acknowledged the comments from restaurant owners and feels that restaurants are an important aspect to the “life” of Ridgewood, the vibrancy brought by the outdoor dining corrals.  The restaurant owners maintained their dining corrals during the winter, hopeful that it would bring additional customers to their establishments.  The restaurant owners could enhance the dining corrals, making them more attractive, if they knew that they would exist in the future. 

 

Councilwoman Perron remarked that if the corrals are messy, Village officials should be telling restaurant owners to clean them up, but not getting rid of them altogether, especially when the revenue to the Village is a “constant” as opposed to parking spaces being full every day.  She views this as a win-win situation with a little bit of monitoring.  She would like to see the dining corrals continue through December 2022.  She mentioned that, of course, the dining corrals would look “drab and dirty” during the winter months.

 

Mayor Knudsen remarked that the dining corrals are not only dirty during the winter.  She has personally dined in the dining corrals and mentioned that there are sandbags, which are used to weigh down the propane heaters, thrown into flowers, and the corrals are messy.  One of the biggest drawbacks of keeping the dining corrals is that retailers are losing significant amounts of money and business because their customers cannot conveniently park close to their businesses (desirable if they are carrying heavy loads).  She mentioned that brick-and-mortar retail businesses are very upset because their prime parking spaces are being utilized by the dining corrals, where other businesses are able to expand their footprint into the middle of the street.  This situation is also discouraging new retailers from opening up businesses in the CBD.

 

Councilwoman Perron indicated that she felt that the brick-and-mortar retailers are up against more than just the dining corrals.  They must compete with online retailers such as Amazon and stores at large malls, as well as Covid.  She feels that the retail businesses will still struggle even if the dining corrals were removed.  Councilwoman Perron indicated that the dining corrals encourage people to park in the Parking Garage, which was built for shoppers and diners.  She said that every retailer wants to have the use of the parking spots in front of their businesses, which is not really possible.  She mentioned one comment by a resident this evening (during which time Mayor Knudsen was absent) in which he indicated that the restaurant owners would be willing to pay a premium above and beyond the established $250.00 per parking space.  Councilwoman Perron indicated that she was in favor of continuing the dining corrals.

 

Mayor Knudsen said that it was not fair to put yet another obstacle in the way of retail business owners, i.e., the dining corrals, reiterating what Councilwoman Perron mentioned about retailers having to compete against online retailers such as Amazon.  She feels that the retailers losing the parking spaces is like “driving the nail into the coffin.”  She stated that the Village Council has an obligation to help retailers in any way they can and it would be unconscionable to put yet another obstacle in their path which would affect their life investments.

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon said that he never viewed the dining corrals as a “permanent fixture.”  He said that dining corrals were instituted when the Covid pandemic began and the State of New Jersey decided that only 25% of a business could be filled with customers.  In order to help businesses in the CBD, dining corrals were allowed.  He believes that the dining corrals helped, but he feels the pandemic is winding down at the current time and the premium parking spots on the streets must be made available once again.

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon spoke about additional revenue being needed to fund the parking garage and stated that he didn’t want to see Ridgewood taxpayers footing the bill.  He also spoke about the recession in 2018 when businesses closed, the economy faltered, and the federal government bailed everyone out.  Deputy Mayor Sedon wants the Village to be able to build a “cushion” or surplus of funds so that it is better prepared in case another recession occurs.  He spoke about what is paid with taxpayers’ money such as the tree wells in the CBD, street paving, etc.  If the Parking Utility has a deficit, taxpayers will probably “cover the bill” until more revenue can be generated in the Parking Utility.  He reiterated that he never viewed the dining corrals as a permanent fixture but merely a measure to help businesses that were desperate at the time to survive.  He believes that this has been accomplished.

 

Mayor Knudsen recalled parking her car on Chestnut Street to visit a store and found a truck blocking her exit from her parking space.  She told the driver she would wait for him to make his liquor delivery and, while waiting, she saw another truck pull up and double park outside of a dining corral.  This meant that all cars entering Chestnut Street from Franklin Avenue had to literally enter the oncoming lane of traffic in order to pass the truck.  She stated that it was a “truck mess” and “an accident waiting to happen.”  If the dining corral had not been there, none of that would have happened.

 

Additionally, Mayor Knudsen recalled another occasion when she was near a restaurant with a dining corral in front of it and she noticed that cars were lined up into the intersection waiting for their takeout orders to be brought to them.  The cars were backed up because they couldn’t park in front of the restaurant and the dining corrals were taking up the parking spaces.  Mayor Knudsen asserted that the dining corrals are creating traffic and safety issues.  She said that the retail establishments have a right to the parking arrangements they signed up for when they originally opened their businesses.


Councilwoman Reynolds stated that she was “really torn” on this dining corral issue.  She likes the corrals and enjoys eating outdoors, even in the winter.  However, she does understand that the retail businesses are really hurting and the Village does not need any more businesses going out of business.  She said she hasn’t made up her mind on this issue and wondered if the retailers had any suggestions.  One thing she was sure of was that there needs to be more parking for the retailers.  For example, if someone wants to just run into the shoe repair place to drop off a pair of shoes, they are not going to park in the parking garage for a 10-minute errand and they’re not going to park on the next block either.

 

Mayor Knudsen said that she feels the Village has gone over and beyond supporting the restaurants in the Village, but she doesn’t feel that the parking spaces should be bid out to the highest bidder at the expense of other businesses.  She said that when a retailer sets up a business in Ridgewood, and they see that there are 10 parking spots in front of their location, they expect them to always be available.  When those parking spaces are cut down to only two spaces, Mayor Knudsen said that it is fundamentally unfair to those businesses.  She agreed with Deputy Mayor Sedon that the dining corrals were never intended to be permanent.  Mayor Knudsen also pointed out that the restaurants still have the option of outdoor dining on the sidewalks adjacent to their establishments.  She feels that the parking spaces should be restored as quickly as possible due to the approaching busy retail season.

 

Ms. Mailander summed everything up by saying there are two Councilmembers in favor of removing the corrals, one undecided, and one who recused himself.  Therefore, the majority has decided that the corrals will be eliminated.  A resolution will be prepared for next week’s meeting to that effect.

 

                        3.         Hybrid Meetings

 

Mayor Knudsen stated that she asked for this item to be placed on the agenda at Councilman Vagianos’s insistence.  Councilman Vagianos began by thanking his Council colleagues for agreeing to place this matter on this evening’s agenda.  He related to Mayor Knudsen that during public comments this evening, there were about 10 people who spoke in favor of hybrid meetings.  He noted that this is an issue that has united people, people who wouldn’t normally “sit on the same side” of any issue.  He said that this is a really important thing to take note of and that the Village Council should not pass over that lightly. 

 

Councilman Vagianos, echoing Mr. Lindenberg’s comments earlier, said that Covid has changed the world.  People have discovered better ways to do things, and Zoom meetings are now the “everyday norm” in the corporate world.  The Ridgewood Library has hybrid access and it has been very well received.  He spoke with Mohamed Mahmoud this evening, who indicated that they allow hybrid access at Board of Education meetings and it is also very well received.  He also stated that many comparisons are made between the Board of Education and Village Council.

 

Councilman Vagianos thanked the members of the League of Women Voters who have appeared many times at meetings to voice their support of hybrid access.  He said Age-Friendly Ridgewood has also voiced support, and stated that the Village wants to be “age friendly.” He stated that the Village Council has an obligation to the citizens in Ridgewood.

 

Councilman Vagianos recalled that Mr. Hansen, who handles IT issues in the Village, estimated that it would cost approximately $7,000.00 to $8,000.00 per year for the Village Council to hold hybrid meetings.  He also recalled Mayor Knudsen’s remark that the Village had to be careful with spending “other people’s money.”  However, he pointed out that the goal of hybrid access is to ensure that those “other people” can see how the Village Council is spending their money, that they can comment and inform Councilmembers whether or not they approve of what they are doing.  He stated that citizens who are disabled, or cannot attend meetings for other reasons, should be given the opportunity to “chime in” with their opinions.

 

Councilman Vagianos said that there are concerns by some Councilmembers that hybrid access will lengthen meetings.  He assured everyone that he himself does not want longer meetings.  He proposed that a 40-minute public comment period be held at the beginning of all meetings, three minutes per person.  That 40-minute limit should not change; the only difference would be that the meetings would start with public comments from the podium, with any remaining time being allotted to those calling in from home.  He proposes the same structure for the end of meetings. People calling in from home would be required to use Zoom so that the Councilmembers can see who is speaking.

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon said that his opinion on this issue has not changed since it was first discussed last year.  He said that the meetings are held in a fully accessible building and that residents have 24/7 email access.  Therefore, residents can comment on any issue anytime they desire.  Residents can call the Village Clerk’s Office and they can write letters.  He said that the Councilmembers are not hiding anything and that residents are not cut off from contacting them. He doesn’t feel that hybrid access is necessary and doesn’t view it as an accessibility issue.

 

Councilwoman Perron stated that emailing or calling a Councilmember is not the same as making a public comment at a meeting because it is not put into the record.  She said that comments via hybrid access should also be on the record.  The Village has the ability at a very reasonable cost to accommodate those residents with disabilities or with children, those who are commuting to work, and those who are on vacation.  She said that it is “axiomatic” that good government encourages public participation.  If the Village Council refuses to allow hybrid access, it will be viewed as hubris, and correctly so. 

 

Councilwoman Perron said that the Village Council needs public input because they “don’t have all the answers.”  Public comments would infuse creativity and new thoughts into meetings.  She urged the Village Council to “listen” to the people who will offer questions and opinions.  She feels that Ridgewood would have a stronger and better government if some form of hybrid access is allowed.  As a compromise, Councilwoman Perron indicated that she was in favor of Councilman Vagianos’s proposal.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds said that many people have asked the Village Council to restore hybrid meetings.  She stated, however, that there has never been a hybrid Village Council meeting.  The only types of meetings they have had have been meetings conducted either 100% via Zoom or 100% in-person.  Notwithstanding that, Councilwoman Reynolds remarked that there are only one or two other towns in Northwest Bergen that offer hybrid meetings.  She said that Ridgewood would be in the majority if it were decided not to have hybrid meetings.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds stated that she now feels stronger than ever that there should not be hybrid meetings.  She acknowledged that Covid has changed the world; however, in the virtual world, Covid has made things worse.  She became emotional when stating that she will not be a part of making this world more virtual.  She stated that children have suffered the most, that people need to get out and do things.  Councilwoman Reynolds stated that if someone has a passion about something, people should attend meetings.  She pointed out that many people came to the meeting this evening, but that she would never encourage hybrid meetings.

 

Mayor Knudsen called a point of order since many people were having conversations in the audience and getting up and down, which she stated was disruptive.  She said that in March 2020, when Covid became a reality for everyone, Ridgewood officials worked feverishly and tirelessly behind the scenes to get everyone up and running via Zoom so that Village business could continue seamlessly.  She echoed Councilwoman Reynolds’ comments that hybrid meetings have never been held.  By the summer of 2021, they were striving to get back to in-person meetings, with interaction and collaboration, which was successfully done.  The Planning Board, Board of Education, and other committees went back to in-person meetings. 

 

Mayor Knudsen said that the suggestion that certain people can’t attend meetings and comment, or that these meetings are not accessible to everyone, is simply not true.  She recalled many meetings with absolute no members of the public present, as well as some other meetings where there were about 600 in attendance. 

 

Mayor Knudsen recalled a recent Community ACCESS Network meeting where someone showed up who had never attended a meeting before, when they were working on housing and job opportunities for the special needs population, who decided to “pop in” and discuss hybrid meetings.  This individual charged that hybrid meetings were cut in June of 2021 and that Zoom attendance went from 100 attendees down to 10.  Mayor Knudsen said that that wasn’t true since the Village Council has never held hybrid meetings and that there was nothing to support the Zoom attendance allegation. 

 

Mayor Knudsen stated that there have been Zoom meetings with 2 attendees, 20 attendees, or 30 attendees, and since in-person meetings were restored in June 2021, there have been times when there were no members of the public in attendance and times when there have been 40 people in the audience.  Mayor Knudsen said that there was no “rhyme nor reason” to the number of attendees at any particular meeting.  She does not feel this is an access issue and stated that the meetings are fully accessible and Village Hall is fully compliant with the law.  She also stated that allowing people in the audience to speak before hearing from a “virtual audience” was discriminatory.  She stated that phone-in callers would feel like “second class citizens.”

 

Mayor Knudsen recalled an email she received from a resident who stated that they had never been to a Village Council meeting but, if they did, they didn’t want to have to get out of their pajamas to attend a meeting.  She said that everyone needs to get out into the world to conduct business, interact with humans, eat in restaurants, shop in stores, and just “live.”  She indicated that the Councilmembers appreciate residents who come to meetings to speak, and she made reference to the approximately 10 people who spoke this evening at the beginning of the meeting. 

 

Besides the people who have voiced their support of hybrid access, Mayor Knudsen stated that there are numerous people who have contacted her to ask her not to allow hybrid access, stating that Zoom meetings are difficult to watch and hard to follow.  People have told her that if they have something to say, they will either attend a meeting in person or send an email.  She said the $8,000.00 projected cost to hold hybrid meetings, when added to other large expenditures, adds up to a large tax increase for the taxpayers of Ridgewood.  She concluded by stating that everyone needs to start working together and to live.

 

Councilman Vagianos stated that the world has changed dramatically in the last 15 to 20 years and that the internet is here to stay.  He mentioned his restaurant and how much he enjoys seeing people coming out to eat.  When GrubHub, Uber Eats and Door Dash began operations, Councilman Vagianos said he didn’t want anything to do with them.  However, when he finally did “give them a try,” he discovered that many customers wanted the option to dine in or do takeout.  These companies give residents greater access and greater opportunity, which the internet has allowed for everyone. 

 

Councilman Vagianos stated that the desire to go back to “normal” is like “pushing against a tide.”  The world is moving forward, and the Village Council needs to move forward with it.  Even though other towns have not gotten into hybrid access, that doesn’t mean Ridgewood cannot do so.  He agreed with Councilwoman Reynolds that it is very important for everyone to go outside and be active.  He looks forward to the time when masks will not be required anymore. 

 

Councilman Vagianos said that the Village needs to adapt to the “new norm.”  He said that while hybrid access will not necessarily happen at the current time, it will eventually happen.  Councilman Vagianos said that he will abide by his promise not to bring up this issue again and would respect the opinions of his colleagues.  However, he promised to bring it up again once a new Village Council has been seated.  He again thanked his Village Council colleagues for putting this matter on this evening’s agenda.

 

Mayor Knudsen mentioned that the Village Council is very similar to the Board of Education, but in many ways they are different.  One of the differences is that the Village Council allows for public hearings, comments from residents which need to be heard by the public.  She said that the Village Council should not begin discriminating against “which public” should be participating in those public hearings; i.e., those who are physically attending meetings and those who are attending virtually.  The Board of Education does not conduct public hearings but do allow call-in comments.  When Village Council Zoom meetings were conducted, those meetings were open to the public.

 

Councilman Vagianos countered by saying that all judicial proceedings are currently done via Zoom.  There is nothing “so sacred” which is stated at Village Council meetings that precludes the use of hybrid meetings.  It should be done the same way as every legal judicial proceeding in the State of New Jersey.  He addressed some of the remarks made by Mayor Knudsen relating to discrimination.  Councilman Vagianos said that she was “technically correct” that there has never been a hybrid Village Council meeting.  However, the point is that hybrid access would bring more people into the “tent.” 

 

Councilman Vagianos stated that there are a lot of people who are not as fortunate as some who can physically attend meetings.  Regarding the fact that Village Hall is fully accessible, Councilman Vagianos stated that some people face many barriers starting at their front door and occurring all the way to the front door of Village Hall.  Some people face barriers that have nothing to do with being handicapped, such as not having enough time due to other obligations.

 

                        4.         Policy on Masks in Village Buildings

 

Ms. Mailander stated that due to decreasing numbers of Covid positive cases, effective March 7, 2022, the mask policy in all Village buildings will be “Masks Recommended But Not Required for Both Vaccinated and Unvaccinated People.”  This policy will also pertain to all meetings and classes held in Village buildings.  This is in line with Governor Murphy’s lifting of the mask mandate in schools and the policy which Ridgewood Public Schools will follow.

 

            E.        OPERATIONS

 

                        1.         Appointment to Ridgewood ACCESS Committee

 

Mayor Knudsen explained that before June 16, 2016, the Community ACCESS Network had been meeting for a couple of years, and it was formalized in June 2016. At that time, only a Chairperson was appointed, who was charged with the task of appointing a Vice-Chairperson.  There are many long-time members of the group. 

 

In the latter part of 2021, Mayor Knudsen decided that there should be more structure and direction for ACCESS, assigned with the task of continuing to look for affordable, viable special needs housing, which they successfully accomplished in 2022.  They worked with United Way and Madeline House, and collaborated with Onyx and the Village of Ridgewood for construction of the Ridgewood Commons, comprised of 16 units designated for the special needs population (8 independent units and 8 supportive units).  The ACCESS Committee has performed a lot of advocacy work and has established programs dealing with future planning for special needs individuals as they enter adulthood, including long-term financial planning, educational opportunities, job fairs, and job training.

 

Mayor Knudsen explained that these tasks were done so that the members of the special needs community had opportunities for not only living, but also for working and socializing.  Mayor Knudsen has prepared a resolution designating the structural organization of the committee, including a Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, Secretary and Treasurer.  The reason that ACCESS requires a Treasurer is because, for many years, they have held “ACCESS Weekend,” which includes a fundraising element.  Mayor Knudsen indicated that she will send the proposed resolution to all Councilmembers and apologized for not submitting it sooner. 

 

To ensure continuity and formal structure, and also to acknowledge the hard work and achievements of the committee members, Mayor Knudsen would like the longstanding members of the committee to be appointed to these formal titled positions, with terms running concurrently for the same length of time.  Most of these members have children or family members in the special needs community.

 

Councilwoman Perron mentioned that appointments to specific positions in committees are usually staggered, and she was wondering why this could not also be done with the ACCESS Committee.  Mayor Knudsen said that she has worked with Inez Bunza, the Chairperson, and Robin Ritter, the Vice Chairperson, and they have recommended this formalization.  It is really focused on acknowledgement and recognition of the members’ many years of contributions towards supporting the special needs community. 

 

Mayor Knudsen indicated that she has been the Council Liaison for the ACCESS Committee since 2016.  Mayor Knudsen said that she would speak to the members of the ACCESS Committee to get their thoughts on possibly staggering the positions.  There is one member of the committee from the LSHSA (Learning Services Home and School Association) which serves the special needs population in Ridgewood Public Schools.

 

6.         REVIEW OF MARCH 9, 2022 PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

 

Ms. Mailander reviewed the items on the March 9, 2022 Public Meeting Agenda.  There are several Proclamations:  Proclaim March Red Cross Month, Proclaim March Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month, and Proclaim March 20-26, 2022 as National Poison Prevention Week.   Fire Lieutenant Brian Peacock, Fire Captain Justin O’Connor, and Fire Chief John Judge will all be sworn in at the March 9, 2022 meeting.  There will be an introduction of the 2022 Budget, with a Budget Message and a PowerPoint presentation, and introduction of an Ordinance to establish a CAP Bank.

 

Resolutions include:  Approve Temporary Water Utility Capital Budget; Approve Temporary General Capital Budget; Approve Temporary Parking Utility Capital Budget; Authorize Three-Year Revenue Average for 2022 Budget; and Approve 2022 Municipal Budget and Set April 13, 2022 as the Date for the Public Hearing Thereon.

 

Ordinances for Introduction for Ridgewood Water include:  Bond Ordinance for Water Utility Capital and Amend Chapter 145 – Fees – Water Rates & PFAS Treatment Charges.

 

There are no public hearings on Ordinances for Ridgewood Water. Resolutions for Ridgewood Water include:  Title 59 Approval and Approval of Contract for Annual PFAS Laboratory Analysis Services; Title 59 Approval and Award of Contract for Annual Laboratory Analysis Services; Title 59 Approval and Award of Contract for Annual HVAC Maintenance for the Village of Ridgewood and Ridgewood Water; Award Contract Under National Joint Powers Alliance Cooperative Pricing System – Maintenance of Various Backup Generators; and Authorize Agreement with Bergen County for the Greenwood Avenue Bridge Replacement Project for the Water Main Relocation.

 

Several Ordinances are scheduled for introduction:  Bond Ordinance for General Capital; Amend Chapter 145 – Fees – Sewer Connection Fees; Amend Chapter 260 – Trees and Shrubs; Amend Chapter 145 – Fees – Trees and Shrubs; Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Zoning Map; Amend Chapter 265 Vehicles and Traffic – Permit Parking – Extended Parking for Ridgewood Residents in Central Business District and Residential Zones; and Designating The Valley Hospital Property as an Area in Need of Redevelopment.

 

Ms. Mailander said that Ordinances set for Public Hearing include:  Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Time Limit Parking on Doremus Avenue; Amend Chapter 222 – Power Tools, Landscaping, and Yard Maintenance Equipment; Long-Term Leasing of Village Parking Spaces for Commercial Dumpsters in the Chestnut Street Lot; and Amend Chapter 145, Fees – Fees for Lease of Parking Spaces for Dumpsters in the Chestnut Street Lot.

 

Resolutions include:  Title 59 Approval and Award of Contract for Irrigation System Services for Parks and Recreation; Award Contract Under County Contract for Tree Trimming Services – The View at Crest Road; Award Contract – Noise-Absorbing Panels for Glen Pickleball Courts (uncertain); Declare Property Surplus for Streets Department; Declare Property Surplus for the Parks Department; Accept New Tree Species for Screening Berm and Landscaping at the Schedler Property; Authorize Cleanup of Gypsy/Kings Pond Park; Appoint Members to Ridgewood ACCESS Committee; and possibly Appointing Member to the Project Pride Committee.

 

Ms. Mailander announced that they may have to authorize the submission of the Recycling Tonnage Grant, which is an annual resolution which allows the Recycling Center to receive the grant.  The need for a resolution by the governing body may have been eliminated.  If this resolution is not needed, then the grant will be accepted without such a resolution.

 

7.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Douglas Goodell, 234 Mulberry Place, stated that he couldn’t understand which property the Village Council was talking about regarding redevelopment, attributing his confusion to the sound system in the room.  Mayor Knudsen explained that the property in discussion was the hospital site on North Van Dien Avenue.  Mr. Goodell said that he had no other comments as he thought that they had been talking about the Maple Avenue property.  Mayor Knudsen indicated that discussions will continue regarding the Maple Avenue property.

 

Mr. Goodell said that he was concerned about “areas in need of redevelopment.”  He said that it was a mechanism for simplifying things and for abuse, which he stated they have witnessed in Ho-Ho-Kus.  Redevelopment requires, as a basis, that the property be one not likely to be subject to private development.  Unless and until that is demonstrated, Mr. Goodell feels that action should not be taken to designate a property as an area in need of redevelopment.  There are mechanisms for zone changes and variance changes and, until those options are exhausted, there is no reason to suppose that properties could not be developed privately.  He said that he wouldn’t be surprised if the property on Van Dien Avenue fell into the same fate as the Maple Avenue property.

 

Mr. Rogers, Village Attorney, mentioned that that is not one of the criteria as it relates to an area in need of redevelopment (that an area is not likely to be subject to private development).  In fact, he stated that the purpose of declaring a property as an area in need of redevelopment is to allow for controlled private development.

 

Mayor Knudsen took the opportunity to thank Mr. Rogers for joining the Ho-Ho-Kus Planning Board meeting on Monday evening (February 28, 2022) where there were also approximately 40 Ridgewood residents in attendance via Zoom.  She stated that all Ridgewood residents did an amazing job stating their case and points of view.

 

Kathryn Schmidt, 123 South Irving Street, stated that she was absolutely “floored” by the comments she heard this evening regarding hybrid meetings.  She indicated that those who do not support hybrid meetings insist upon people physically attending meetings.  She stated that there were many people attending the meeting this evening voicing their support of hybrid meetings.  Ms. Schmidt said that she wonders if it really “matters” when residents make public comments and if the Village Council is really listening to what the public is saying.  She wondered how decisions were being made if the Village Councilmembers were not really hearing what people were saying.

 

Ms. Schmidt said that, referring to Deputy Mayor Sedon’s remarks, conversations at the Stop & Shop do not constitute remarks made on the public record.  She asked where remarks made by people opposed to hybrid meetings are shown in the record.  She is astonished because residents have done what the Village Council has asked them to do, physically attending meetings to voice their opinions and concerns.  She feels like everyone is just being ignored.

 

Ms. Schmidt said that she appreciated Councilwoman Reynolds’ remarks that everyone needs to get back to normal; however, Ms. Schmidt questioned what “getting back to normal” means.  She said that her world has changed and that, whether due to paranoia or her age, she was not sure whether being in a large crowd would ever feel “normal” to her again.  She recalled some things in the past which were not “normal” – women working, two-income families, communicating via email – but today these things are normal.  She was hopeful that perhaps the Village Council would consider a pilot hybrid access program to see if the objections to hybrid access are valid or not.

 

Siobhan Crann Winograd, 274 Ivy Place, said that she was extremely sad about the outcome of hybrid access.  She stated that these meetings have become a “post truth era” and a “bully pulpit.”  The Village Council has insisted that people appear in person at meetings, yet these same people are “mocked” while they are at meetings.  Statements are attributed to people that aren’t true.  One of her neighbors was mocked because she could not find her reading glasses and another resident was mocked because they were wearing pajamas. 

 

Ms. Crann Winograd said that everyone is assuming that hybrid access equates to “Zoom.” However, if the Councilmembers had addressed her very lengthy email to them in June 2021, they would be aware that “hybrid access” can mean many things.  She that that the Village Council has certainly run hybrid meetings, by receiving written comments, for example.  “Hybrid” does not always mean “Zoom.”  Old-school techniques can constitute a hybrid meeting.

 

Ms. Crann Winograd stated that she also has concerns about Zoom.  She has never even bought an X-Box for her children and has led an “anti-Chromebook” campaign; she was also a “late bloomer” as it relates to children having cellphones.  She said that people in support of hybrid access are not obsessed with technology or interested in hurting their kids.  Ms. Crann Winograd stated that everyone wants to get back to normal, but conversations need to be “rooted in reality and safe.”  She said that Village Council meetings have become a “bully pulpit.”  She stated that her father, who was disabled with post-polio syndrome, was very active in discussions regarding housing and other matters.

 

Ms. Crann Winograd stated that the Village Council’s “intimidation tactics” and trying to silence people are atrocious.  She said that Councilmembers are not fulfilling their responsibilities to enable communication with the older population.  She mentioned how difficult it was for Ann Melone to attend this evening’s meeting.  She stated that everyone wants Covid to be over, but it is not yet over. 

 

Anne Burton Walsh, 112 South Irving Street, thanked the Village Council for putting the issue of hybrid access on the agenda.  She stated that she liked Councilman Vagianos’s suggestion that people who are calling in must do it via Zoom so that everyone can see their face, as well as limiting the time periods for the public comments portion of the meeting.  She stated that children are different than adults and that she shared Councilwoman Reynolds’ concerns about the use of technology with educating children.  She said that she and her mother have advocated for years against the use of “screen technology” in K-12 education.  They also opposed the Chromebook initiative and are currently advocating for face-to-face world language instruction in K-5 where the children have been using computer software for the past 10 years to do their lessons, which she claims is ineffective.

 

Ms. Walsh stated that hybrid access has become widespread due to Covid, used by Corporate America, law firms, and court systems.  Her friend who is employed in the New York Court System stated that they will continue hybrid access and will never return to in-person court hearings, except for jury trials. 

 

Bob Fuhrman, 49 Clinton Avenue, addressed the issue of double parking.  He stated that if he parks his car next to a dining corral, he would be considered to be double parked.  The same would hold true if he parked his car behind three cars that are parked in designated parking spots. 

 

Mr. Fuhrman stated that he also wanted to address the issue of hybrid access.  He urged viewers of tonight’s meeting to make note of the three Councilmembers who voted against hybrid meetings, and to remember this when the November election rolls around.  Mr. Fuhrman spoke about the remarks indicating that there were many people opposed to hybrid access and wondered where those people were.

 

Lillian Blood, 250 North Maple Avenue, said she wanted to talk about transparency.  She cannot understand why the Village Council will not approve hybrid meetings.  She is confused because the Village Councilmembers state that they want people to be involved in what is occurring in Ridgewood, yet they do not care to listen to people who cannot physically attend meetings.  She said that she can attend meetings because she doesn’t live far away and has no disabilities. 

 

Ms. Blood indicated that she enjoys in-person meetings; however, she stated that her “rose-colored glasses” have been broken. She had been warned about hybrid meetings being rejected but she had refused to believe that. She was warned by friends that members of the Village Council do not want people to know what is going on.  This saddens her because she always communicates with Village Councilmembers and is upset that people who cannot physically attend meetings do not have the opportunity to make comments that are made a part of the public record.

 

Matthew Lindenberg, 165 Claremont Road, offered his “congratulations” to the Village Council. He mentioned that during the last two years of the pandemic, there have been very few good things which have happened.  However, two good things that come to mind were the expansion of the outdoor dining options in Ridgewood and the increased accessibility afforded to residents so that they could participate in a wider variety of things, through the convenience of technology. Mr. Lindenberg stated that in “one fell swoop,” the Village Council has gotten rid of all of this.  He didn’t agree that “things should be the way they have always been.”  He stated that the Village Council doesn’t care about people with disabilities.  He told viewers to remember this when the time comes for November elections.

 

Boyd A. Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that there were comments heard from the dais this evening about the differences between the Board of Education and the Village Council with respect to public hearings.  However, he stated that the Ridgewood Board of Education does indeed conduct public hearings, with the most recent ones being on January 25, 2021 and on February 10, 2020, although they are not held as frequently as the public hearings during Village Council meetings.

 

In addition, Mr. Loving stated that he attended almost every Village Council meeting prior to March 2020 (dating back to 2000), but he has never seen an instance when he has tried to attend a Village Council meeting and the downstairs door has been locked, necessitating his having to be buzzed in by the Police Department.  This is what occurred to him this evening.  He said that it was alarming to him that people are being “intimidated at the door” and not allowed in until buzzed in by the Police Department.  He asked if this action was something new, was in response to a threat, or was per the direction of the Village Manager with respect to making accessibility to Village Council meetings difficult.

 

No one else came forward for public comments and Mayor Knudsen closed the public portion of the meeting.  Mayor Knudsen indicated that she was not sure why the door was locked and that it was an error, but it certainly was not done to keep anyone out of the meeting.  Ms. Mailander also indicated that she would never lock anyone out of the building. 

 

Mayor Knudsen stated that non-approval of hybrid access is not in any way an issue of transparency.  She reminded everyone that people who are politicizing a topic, subject or agenda item should be carefully watched to see what their individual agendas are.  She insisted that she was not mocking anyone.

 

8.         RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

 

Deputy Clerk Eileen Young read Resolution #22-80, to go into Closed Session as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.         ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Deputy Mayor Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Perron, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Work Session was adjourned at 9:47 P.M.

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                           

                                                                                                Susan Knudsen

                                                                                                                     Mayor

 

 

 

                                                                       

Eileen Young

Deputy Village Clerk

  • Hits: 644

A REGULAR PUBLIC WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, ON FEBRUARY 23, 2022 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

1.         CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

 

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 7:31 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act.  At roll call the following were present:  Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Vagianos, Sedon, and Mayor Knudsen.  Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Eileen Young, Deputy Village Clerk; and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney.

 

Mayor Knudsen led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.  There was a moment of silence for all men and women serving our nation, all first responders, and all victims of violent crimes.

 

2.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Ann Melone, 134 Foster Terrace, said that she was speaking on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Ridgewood.  She once again urged the Village Council to adopt hybrid access to Village Council meetings or at least place the subject on the agenda and vote on it.  She mentioned that it is very difficult for many people to attend meetings in person, and there are many people who wish to call in from home.  Ms. Melone indicated that residents are able to do this at Board of Education meetings. 

 

Ms. Melone indicated that the League of Women Voters wanted to address the timeliness of the posting of minutes on the Village website.  On January 14, 2019, the League wrote a letter to the Village Council advising that the Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) requires public bodies to make meeting minutes “promptly available” to the public, citing N.J.S.A. Chapter 10, Sections 4-14.  In that letter, they also noted that the New Jersey Supreme Court has written that the term “promptly available” signals to public bodies “the Legislative expectation that the release of minutes must be considered a priority, an obligation, and not a nuisance to be addressed when convenient.”  In Kane Federation of Teachers vs. Morelle, 233 N.J. 566, 2018, the Court stated that a five-month delay was unreasonable. 

 

Ms. Melone noted that the Board of Education releases its minutes within one week of its meetings in a user-friendly format.  In that letter, the League requested that the Village Council make all minutes available to the public within 45 days of a meeting in order to comply with OPMA.

 

Ms. Melone stated that the League of Women Voters sent a follow-up letter on December 5, 2019, because minutes were still not up to date, and again on February 9, 2022, after Mayor Knudsen stated at a meeting that prompt posting of minutes was not required by OPMA.  Ms. Melone stated that as of February 3, 2022, the Village Council has not posted minutes since January of 2021.  She concluded by restating her request that all minutes be made promptly available to the public.

 

Erica Dunckley, 251 Ivy Place, said she has lived in Ridgewood for 28 years and is also concerned about the public’s accessibility to Village Council meetings. She thanked all members of the Village Council, stating that she is sure it is “not an easy job.”  When there was remote access to the meetings during Covid, the allotted time for comments (40 minutes) was completely filled with comments.  She feels that residents really appreciated being able to share their feelings and concerns.  It gave people a sense of belonging and that they had a “share” in what was going on in the Village.  She stated that while she is able-bodied, there are many people in Ridgewood who are not and who cannot physically attend meetings (older people, people who cannot drive, people with disabilities).  She feels that it is very important that everyone be able to make comments at Village Council meetings.

 

Siobhan Crann Winograd, 274 Ivy Place, stated that she was once again speaking about hybrid access, which has been supported by hundreds of people in various organizations or individually. She said that this was a “curious thing” for the public to be pushing, and all the talk and comments about reinstating hybrid access has distracted everyone from more important issues, such as the quality of Ridgewood’s water.  She said that residents are getting the message, through Village Council resistance to reinstating hybrid access, that the Village Council “just doesn’t want to hear from people.”  Ms. Crann Winograd stated that this sends a terrible message to the disabled community.  She stated that the Village Council’s refusal to put this matter on the agenda seems to be “antagonizing” the public. 

 

Ms. Crann Winograd said that the topic of hybrid access was discussed once in September of 2021 and that it was never voted upon.  She is not even sure of the reasons for the denial.  She thought that the addition of Councilman Vagianos to the Village Council, public outcry, and “basic moral decency” would have warranted that this issue be placed on the agenda.  She questioned whether the members of the Village Council could “self-regulate.”  She feels that if a Councilmember requests that a matter be placed on the agenda, the other Councilmembers should support that other member, even if they intend to vote “no.”  She said that the Village Council is not a “majority bloc,” which is antithetical to Ridgewood’s form of government.  The Village Council is a “Council of equals,” and this matter should be placed on the agenda as requested by both Councilmembers Perron and Vagianos.  She feels that a vote on hybrid access should be made a matter of public record.

 

Rurik Halaby, 1 Franklin Avenue, stated that the HealthBarn “nightmare” is over and he thanked its many passionate supporters and the handful of people who worked so hard behind the scenes to “get to the finish line.”  He thought it would be appropriate for the Village Council to pass a Proclamation thanking Stacey Antine for all her hard work over the past five years and to wish her good luck over the next five years.  Mr. Halaby stated that the Proclamation should also apologize to Stacey Antine for what she has had to endure these past 15 months.  No business in Ridgewood should be subjected to what Stacey experienced.  The Lease has been signed by all parties and everyone should “move on.”  However, Mr. Halaby indicated that if the Village Council has not learned from their mistakes, they most likely will make the same mistakes again. He said that the length of time leading up to the signing of the lease by Village officials is perplexing to him.  He spoke about missing documents and admitted that he may not have all the facts, but he couldn’t understand why it took Village officials ten days to finally sign the lease.

 

Mr. Halaby indicated that the intersection of East Ridgewood Avenue and Broad Street is one of the most dangerous intersections in Ridgewood.  It was the site of an unfortunate accident on Monday, February 21, 2022.  He urged the Village Council to install a four-way stop sign at that intersection.  He has spoken to many people who have told him about the difficulties in getting this accomplished.  Despite this, Mr. Halaby urged the Village Council to “just get it done.”  This section of the CBD needs to be made safer for pedestrians.

 

Mr. Halaby addressed the issue of hybrid meetings, stating that some Councilmembers indicated they heard from scores of people voicing their objections to the reinstatement of hybrid meetings.  However, no names have ever been set forth.

 

No one else came forward for public comments and Mayor Knudsen closed the public portion of the meeting.  Mayor Knudsen indicated that meeting minutes are approved in a prompt manner, are always available in the Village Clerk’s Office, and are compliant with the law.  She acknowledged that the minutes should be posted on the Village website in a more timely manner and they are working to accomplish that goal.  She reiterated that she wanted to be very clear that the requirement is to have the minutes approved, which they are, and they are always available as required by law in the Village Clerk’s Office.

 

3.         MANAGER’S REPORT

 

Ms. Mailander announced that the Ridgewood Arts Council and Project Pride are both looking for volunteers to serve.  The deadline to apply is February 25, 2022.  She asked any interested residents to click on the tile on the Village website entitled “Employment and Volunteer Opportunities,” to locate the Citizen Volunteer Leadership form.  A cover letter and resume (or biography) should be submitted, along with the form to Deputy Village Clerk, Eileen Young, by February 25, 2022.

 

The annual Budget Meetings are held in the Sydney V. Stoldt, Jr. Courtroom.  The next two Budget Meetings are scheduled for February 25, 2022 and February 28, 2022 at 5:00 P.M.  These meetings will also be televised on FIOS Channel 34 and on YouTube.  The public is encouraged to attend these meetings where Department Directors explain various aspects of their budgets.

 

Due to increased requests from senior residents for rides to the Wyckoff ShopRite, bus rides will be increased to include the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month on a trial basis.  This service is free for Ridgewood seniors.  Reservations are required by calling the Village Manager’s Office.  This service will be evaluated at the end of May to determine if it is providing the intended purpose.

 

Ms. Mailander stated that for over 70 years, Jamboree has presented an original musical show to raise money for college scholarships.  In past years, they have traditionally offered free tickets to senior citizens.  This year, senior citizens are invited to enjoy a free dress rehearsal on March 2, 2022 at 7 P.M. at the Benjamin Franklin Middle School.  Interested seniors should call the Senior Bus Dispatcher at the Village Manager’s Office to reserve a free ride on the bus.

 

The 34th Super Science Saturday Fair will be held on March 5, 2022 from 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M.  Anyone interested should visit supersciencesaturday.org for details and to view this interactive, live-streamed virtual event.

 

Ms. Mailander announced that there are some new children’s programs.  Rocking Music Workshop for Kids is for grades K-1, where students will learn the fundamental concepts such as the musical alphabet, notes on the piano and basic rhythms.  The baby grand piano in the Community Center will be used for this program.  Each child will learn to play a full song on the piano by the end of their musical journey which begins on March 21, 2022 from 3:45 to 4:30 P.M. 

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that there is a new program for senior residents called “Seated Tap Dance with the Joy of Motion,” which will start on Friday, March 11, 2022 from 9:30 to 10:15 A.M.  Ms. Mailander indicated that interested residents can register for these and other programs on the Village website at ridgewoodnj.net/communitypass.

 

Tennis and pickleball memberships for 2022 are on sale at The Stable and must be renewed from the prior year.  If a resident did not receive a yellow membership badge in 2021, they must have their picture taken and badge printed for 2022 at The Stable, Monday through Friday, 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M.  Ms. Mailander encouraged residents to sign up for E-notices on the Village website to stay informed about Village events and to receive timely notifications.

 

Village Council meetings are broadcast live from the Village Hall Courtroom on the Village website, Channel 34 on FIOS, and YouTube.  Upcoming Work Sessions are scheduled for March 2, March 23 and April 6, 2022 beginning at 7:30 P.M., and the next Public Meeting is scheduled for March 9, 2022 at 8:00 P.M.  All of these dates are listed on the Village calendar.

 

4.         COUNCIL REPORTS

 

Councilwoman Perron announced that the Central Business District Advisory Committee (CBDAC) met and received updates from the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC) Liaison and from Ridgewood commercial property owners group.  CBDAC has a subcommittee which will be looking at the pedestrian tunnel underneath the train tracks to determine if it needs “rejuvenation.”  The next meeting of CBDAC is scheduled for March 10, 2022 via Zoom at 8:30 P.M. and the public is welcome.  Interested residents should contact Councilwoman Perron for the link in order to attend the virtual meeting.

 

Councilwoman Perron reported that there are three proposed projects locally which could affect Ridgewood residents.  In Paramus, at the corner of Ridgewood Avenue and Paramus Road, what used to be a nursery is going to become a CVS drive-through and a restaurant.  It is being proposed that the historic house on that property be moved westward.  A public hearing concerning this matter will be held before the Paramus Planning Board on March 3, 2022 at 7:00 P.M. at Paramus Borough Hall, 1 West Jockish Square.

 

In addition, the owner of 432 Grove Street in Glen Rock is applying to the Glen Rock Zoning Board to use the property for parking and storage of landscaping vehicles (trucks, trailers, and equipment) and to conduct soil-moving activities.  This application will be heard via Zoom on March 2, 2022 at Glen Rock Borough Hall at 7:30 P.M.

 

Lastly, in Ho-Ho-Kus on North Maple Avenue, there have been a lot of buildings demolished and there is an application to construct a mixed-use building with 67 residential units.  This will be heard on February 28, 2022 at 7:00 P.M.

 

Councilman Vagianos reported that the Stigma-Free Committee met last week and discussed the newly named “Lifestyle Challenge.”  The Health Department has held this event for the past several years, and it begins on April 7, 2022.  It used to be called the “Weight Loss Challenge,” but they decided to expand the scope of the program to include healthy lifestyle changes which individuals can make in their lives.  The goal is simply to get people moving and to eat healthier. He encouraged everyone to participate.  Anyone interested should contact the Health Department for details.

 

 

Councilman Vagianos indicated that the Parks and Recreation Committee met on February 22, 2022  and discussed a policy question which he is going to ask to be placed on the agenda.  He mentioned that some committees have members who are either not interested or too busy to attend meetings.  This sometimes presents problems with attaining a quorum and recruiting productive members.  The committee recently interviewed many qualified people for openings on the committee, as many as six people for each opening.  Councilman Vagianos proposed that if a member of a committee misses 30% of the meetings, over a period of time, that member would be contacted and eventually replaced by a new member, with the approval of the Village Council.

 

Councilman Vagianos mentioned that the fields in Ridgewood are overused, exacerbated by recent flooding issues.  The Fields Committee is seriously considering postponing the opening of the spring season at Vets Field and Citizens Field until April 15, 2022 because these fields are being reseeded and the seeds need time to “take hold” so that the fields can withstand another season.  That decision will be made on March 1, 2022 by the Fields Committee at 7:00 A.M.  He will keep everyone informed.

 

Councilman Vagianos next spoke about hybrid access.  He indicated that reinstating hybrid access would allow everyone to participate.  One objection to this reinstatement has been the cost.  Councilman Vagianos spoke with Mr. Dylan Hansen in the IT Department, and he was informed that the Village has the technology to reinstate hybrid access at any time.  The additional cost to do so would be approximately $7,000.00 to $8,000.00 a year, according to Mr. Hansen.  Councilman Vagianos considers this to be a “nominal cost,” given the amount of public access it would afford Village residents. 

 

At the request of his Village Council colleagues, Councilman Vagianos stated that he reviewed the September 22, 2021 meeting wherein the issue hybrid access was discussed.  He quoted Mayor Knudsen as saying, “I need a little more time to think about this.”  He asked that this matter be placed on the agenda for a vote.  He will respect any decision which is made by a majority of the Village Council.  Councilman Vagianos mentioned that the Library allows hybrid access for their Board Meetings and that it is extremely successful and very well received.  At a minimum, Councilman Vagianos suggested a pilot program for hybrid access to see how it works.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds stated that the Planning Board met on February 15, 2022.  Heyer-Gruel presented their findings for Ridgewood’s Master Plan.  The presentation covered downtown economic development, land use, circulation, sustainability and green building, community facilities, recycling, utilities, and historic preservation.  Councilwoman Reynolds indicated that it was a great meeting, very thorough and comprehensive.  For anyone who missed it, the meeting has been posted on RidgewoodVillageMP.org and it has been requested that it be posted on the Village website.  The next Planning Board meeting to discuss the Master Plan is scheduled for April 5, 2022.

 

The Citizens Safety Advisory Committee met on February 17, 2022; however, Councilwoman Reynolds was not able to attend that meeting since she had to attend the Special Budget Meeting held that same night.  However, she reviewed the minutes.  Three new members were appointed and welcomed to the committee.  The planned sidewalk and roadway improvement projects from the Safe Routes to Schools grants are anticipated for construction in 2022, contingent upon New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) approvals for release of the funds. 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds indicated that the West Glen Avenue and North Monroe Street signal project is expected to be completed in 2022.  The pedestrian-actuated signal at West Glen Avenue and Hillcrest Road has been completed.  The sample banners for Smart Street New Jersey, intended to be displayed in approximately 12 locations along East Ridgewood Avenue, were reviewed.  These banners will also be presented to the Village Council prior to their targeted installation date of March or April of 2022.  A previously submitted proposal from one of the new members, Mr. Prieto, was positively praised, along with his statement that “we must keep the continuous improvement conversation going.” He is extremely concerned with pedestrian safety.

 

A Zoom discussion by Age-Friendly Ridgewood regarding sidewalk bicycle riding safety will be scheduled.  Anyone interested in joining the discussion should contact Age-Friendly Ridgewood or Sheila Brogan.  A date has not yet been set for this discussion. 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds indicated that a Ridgewood resident has suggested additional pedestrian-actuated signals in the CBD; specifically, at East Ridgewood Avenue and Broad Street, and at Oak Street.  This resident reported seeing frequent occurrences of northbound Broad Street drivers failing to stop for pedestrians, particularly in the north crosswalk at East Ridgewood Avenue.  There was a tragic accident earlier this week at that intersection.  Councilwoman Reynolds feels that the Village Engineer should get involved to see whether a pedestrian-actuated signal would help at that intersection.  The next CSAC meeting is scheduled for March 17, 2022.

 

Mayor Knudsen introduced Sophie Miller, Ridgewood’s new “TAPinto” reporter.  The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) met on February 10, 2022.  They welcomed two new commission members.  The commission heard applications for new and exciting businesses, including Envy by Melissa Gorga at 7 East Ridgewood Avenue, Fitometry Health Club at 129 South Broad Street, Borrow Baby at 80 East Ridgewood Avenue, and Bally Salon at 109 East Ridgewood Avenue.  The commission also reviewed one residential application.  There was review and discussion regarding the draft historical element of the Master Plan, led by Diane O’Brien.  Integral to the discussion was establishing an understanding of the criteria for both historic homes and historic districts. 

 

Mayor Knudsen indicated that many historic homes in Ridgewood have been razed and, in some cases, some historic neighborhoods have been demolished.  As a result, some homes in Ridgewood will no longer qualify as either historic structures or historic districts, which Mayor Knudsen said is a terrible loss for Ridgewood.  The HPC will make a recommendation to place a pause on demolition permit applications before the Zoning Board, pending a review by the HPC.  This would also apply to exterior renovations of historic structures, regardless of the need for a variance.  At the present time, only applications pending variance relief before the Zoning Board are brought before the HPC for review.

 

Mayor Knudson indicated that planning has commenced for the Fourth of July parade and fireworks.  The Access Committee met on February 17, 2022.  Most of the residents are moved into the Ridgewood Commons.  This is special needs housing for adults, with eight independent living units and eight supportive living units.  Access members are grateful that the United Way and Madeline House have created such wonderful living areas.  Inez Bunza presented the idea of having Ridgewood Police meet with the residents at Ridgewood Commons to explain situations and emergencies which may require police assistance.

 

Mayor Knudsen also indicated that there was a discussion about the intersection of Franklin and Maple Avenues.  There is a consensus that this intersection needs to be addressed, especially since it is only one block away from the new Ridgewood Commons location.  This discussion was joined by Bergen County representatives regarding the Franklin Avenue corridor.  It has been suggested that all of the traffic lights at that intersection turn red at the same time so that pedestrians have the opportunity to cross the street safely.

 

The Access Committee was thrilled to hear that special needs residents were included in the development of Ridgewood’s Master Plan.  Inez Bunza and Robin Ritter joined Mayor Knudsen at a Master Plan team meeting on February 15, 2022, in order to address concerns of the Village’s special needs population.  Discussion items included the train station, future housing needs, employment opportunities and transportation.


The Library Board of Trustees met on February 22, 2022.  Friends of the Ridgewood Public Library reported that the 2022 32nd Author Luncheon has already sold more than 188 tickets.  She encouraged anyone interested in attending this event to purchase their ticket soon before they sell out.  This will be an in-person event with Yaa Gyasi, New York Times best-selling author of “Homegoing” and “Transcendent Kingdom.”  The luncheon will be held at Seasons on Wednesday, April 6, 2022 from 11:00 A.M. to 2:30 P.M.  There will be a “meet and greet” and book signing opportunity with the author, as well as a cocktail hour, seated three-course lunch, a talk by the author followed by a Q&A session, silent auction and 50/50.  Mayor Knudsen believes that there is a link on the Ridgewood Library website or tickets can be obtained via EventBee.

 

Mayor Knudsen indicated that the Library Board of Trustees developed a new resident “Welcome Pack” and distributed them to newcomers to the Village.  The Board continues to work on modifications to the Library renovation plan, connection plans for the emergency generator (shared service with Ridgewood Water), and rental of the Pease Library.

 

On February 22, 2022, Mayor Knudsen attended the Grand Opening of Samantha Bennett Artistry along with Councilwoman Perron.  She encouraged everyone to stop by to wish Ms. Bennett well in her new business located at 201 East Ridgewood Avenue, Suite 11, above the Hot Jewelry Box.  Mayor Knudsen stated that this newly renovated space is beautiful.  Ms. Bennett has a degree from AMA and is a licensed aesthetician.  Services include facials, makeup artistry, eyelash lifts, eyebrow lamination, among others.

 

5.         DISCUSSION ITEMS

 

A.        BUDGET

 

                        1.         Renewal of Bergen County Joint Insurance Fund Membership

 

Ms. Mailander explained that the Village of Ridgewood has been a member of the Bergen County Joint Insurance Fund for over two decades.  At this time, the Village must renew its membership for the next three years. 

 

                        2.         Budget Reserve Transfer Resolution

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that this is a resolution to transfer money from 2021 budgets containing excess money to those 2021 budgets that do not have sufficient funds.

 

                        3.         Cancellation of Emergency Appropriations

 

Ms. Mailander said that as a result of Hurricane Ida, the Village was required to adopt a resolution for an Emergency Appropriation.  This allowed the Village to expedite the process for awarding contracts and paying for personnel costs for overtime and equipment rentals required to repair/replace lost or damaged property.  The Village Council adopted two resolutions:  one appropriating $1,828,900.00 ($1,753,900.00 from the Current Fund and $75,000.00 from the Water Utility Fund) to cover the storm-related costs; the second providing the down payment of $74,500.00 for the issuance of a Capital Ordinance.  The Village adopted a General Capital Ordinance for $1,564,500.00 and a Water Capital Ordinance for $75,000.00 for the storm-related costs.  The Village Council then adopted a resolution cancelling the Emergency Appropriations for the Current Fund in the amount of $1,564,400.00 and Water Utility Fund in the amount of $75,000.00.  This was because the funding was in the Capital Ordinances. 

 

Ms. Mailander explained that after accounting for the related expenditures through the end of 2021, it was determined that there were sufficient funds available in the General Capital Fund Ordinance which allows the Village Council to consider cancelling the remainder of the Current Fund Emergency Appropriation in the amount of $189,400.00.  This will eliminate the need for budgeting this amount in the 2022 Current Fund Operating Budget.  Village auditors have indicated that adopting the cancellation before the introduction of the 2022 budget will support the reduction required in the 2022 Deferred Charge appropriations.

 

                        4.         Award Contract – Pickleball Courts Acoustical Soundproofing Panels

 

Ms. Mailander explained that it was necessary for the Village to find a new vendor for the sound-absorbing panels.  The Parks and Recreation Department was able to locate another company that will provide the same product with the same sound-absorbing level as the product originally discussed.  This new product will cost an additional $1,289.00.  The quote is from Vibration Products, Inc., of Columbus, Ohio, in an amount not to exceed $23,980.00. Nancy Bigos, Director of Parks and Recreation, distributed a sample of the product to the Councilmembers.  Ms. Mailander indicated that it was similar, if not better, than the previous product the Village was considering.

 

Ms. Bigos stated that her staff has found a superior product.  The previous product had an NRC rating of .75; the NRC rating on this newer product is 1.05.  The amount of absorption in the newer product is better.  It is a quilted fiberglass absorbent exterior panel which is 2” thick.  There are grommets along the top, middle, and bottom edges on the sides.  Her department is looking to purchase 85 absorber panels that are 4’ x 10’ at a cost of $23,980.00.

 

Mayor Knudsen indicated that she contacted the distributor (Roy Williams) of Vibration Products.  When she viewed their website and products, it appeared that the material is used primarily for industrial and commercial uses.  They discussed nonlinear sound waves which “explode” into the air.  Apparently Mr. Williams was unaware of how the Village planned to use this product.  Mayor Knudsen said that the sound will not be mitigated whatsoever with this product in relation to the surrounding residences.  Mr. Williams said that to actually mitigate the sound emanating from the pickleball courts, a wall or fence with this material installed on it would need to be erected at least as high as the second floor level of the closest house or houses so that the sound waves are “stopped.”  In the alternative, he suggested installing a roof on the courts. 

 

Mayor Knudsen asked Mr. Williams if he would be interested in doing a site visit and he indicated that he would gladly do so; however, the Village Council would have to consult with a sound engineer to understand how to actually absorb the sound.  She stated that the letter from Bergen County indicated that the readings were taken mid-court and not from the actual property lines of the neighbors who are complaining.  Although Mayor Knudsen would really like to resolve this sound issue, she was apprehensive about spending more taxpayer dollars on something that, in all likelihood, will not solve the problem.

 

Councilman Vagianos said that he did not agree with Mayor Knudsen’s overall assessment.  He said that he was happy to hear that the NCR rating on this new product is significantly better than the original product the Village was considering purchasing.  He believes that the sound attenuation already done, based upon the sound study that was done on site and his personal observations on numerous occasions, is more than adequate.  However, he added that the additional sound-absorbing panels will only make it better.  He thanked Ms. Bigos for her research in finding this new product and indicated that he is satisfied with it.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked Ms. Bigos where it was indicated that the NRC rating was 1.05.  She indicated that she also spoke with Mr. Williams and he couldn’t tell Councilwoman Reynolds what the NRC rating was off the top of his head.  However, he did indicate that he was not in the office and would send her a chart once he returned to the office.  The chart that he supplied to Councilwoman Reynolds shows that the NRC level is .75.  The product model number is QFA-EXT-D-2.  In this instance, this newer product would be either comparable to or better than the original product. 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds also asked Mr. Williams if his company had ever sold these panels to anyone for use as sound attenuation for a pickleball court.  He was surprised to hear of this usage and indicated that it is usually used at construction sites and commercial settings.  When he was advised that there were already sound-blocking panels installed on the interior of the pickleball courts, Mr. Williams indicated that he was not sure whether or not installing his product on the interior of the pickleball courts, while having the other panels moved to the exterior of the courts, would help a lot with absorbing the sound.  She feels that more investigation is needed.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds also indicated that she looked at Title 37 of the New Jersey Administrative Code, under Noise Control, but hadn’t had time to call Maureen Kelly who performed the sound study at the pickleball courts for Bergen County.  The General Requirements of Title 37 states that all tests shall be conducted in accordance with certain procedures; item two under that section indicates that measurements shall be taken at or within the property line of any affected person.  She doesn’t believe that the sound measurements were taken at the property line of the affected people.  Councilwoman Reynolds indicated that no one really knows how the pickleball noise sounds like in someone’s backyard or in their home other than the residents of the home.

 

Councilman Vagianos stated that he stood at the perimeter of three of the four affected properties and the sound was, in his opinion, completely negligible and lower than whatever background sound he could hear.  He stated that the sounds of kids laughing by the pickleball courts was “many times louder” than the sound of the pickleball itself.  At some people’s homes, he couldn’t hear anything.  He lives closer to the pickleball courts than several of these homes.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds indicated that she was talking about people who live between one foot or several feet away from the property line of the pickleball court.  Councilman Vagianos said that was the reason he supported getting the additional sound-absorbing panels.  Councilwoman Reynolds agreed with Councilman Vagianos and stated that she really wants the panels to work, but she doesn’t feel that the Village Council has enough information to move forward with the purchase of these panels at this time.

 

Mayor Knudsen indicated that she was not comfortable with proceeding with the purchase of these sound-absorbing panels at this time.  Deputy Mayor Sedon said that, while he didn’t personally speak with Mr. Williams, he suggested that the Village Council wait two weeks until the next Public Meeting to address the issues raised and see if they can come to some sort of decision at that time.  Mayor Knudsen encouraged Deputy Mayor Sedon to call Mr. Williams to discuss these points with him.  She also suggested that the letter from Bergen County regarding the sound study be reviewed since she was unaware that the testing should have been done on the property line of the affected persons.

 

Councilman Vagianos stated that it appears this newer product has an NRC rating of .75, the same as the original product, and he asked what exactly needs to be “found out” before the Village Council makes a decision. 

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon replied that he wants to make sure that the panels will mitigate the sound and he wants to determine exactly what the NRC rating is, whether it is 1.05 or .75.  He spoke about this large expenditure and stated that, when combined with all the other requests for monies from other departments, the Village may be facing a high tax increase.  He wants to spend taxpayer dollars in the most meaningful and appropriate way.  He does agree that it seems like a similar material and indicated that he would give Mr. Williams a call to try to clarify these issues.  Deputy Mayor Sedon again suggested that this matter be discussed again at the March 9, 2022 meeting.  Councilwoman Reynolds added that she wants to find out more information about why the sound study was not performed on the neighbors’ property lines.

 

Councilman Vagianos agreed with Deputy Mayor Sedon that this is a large expenditure.  He said that no one is going to give a “guarantee” on whether or not these panels will be adequate to control the sound.  The Village Council is going to do everything possible to try to attenuate the sound.  He added that he only did his “pickleball tour” when the four courts were completely full.  He said that he was personally satisfied that the sound, as it now stands, does not disturb the neighbors.  Adding the extra panels will make the situation the best it can possibly be.  Councilman Vagianos stated that “some people” would like to keep delaying this matter until “it dies.”

 

There was a discussion about the inappropriate language that had been heard at the pickleball courts, for which the players apologized.  Mayor Knudsen remarked about how the neighbors are seriously affected by the noise, especially the neighbors who live one foot off the property line of the courts, and she indicated that people are being deprived of the use of their property because of the noise.  She mentioned that the noise level would have to be brought down to 65 decibels in order for the sound levels to be acceptable, according to the letter from Bergen County.  Mayor Knudsen took exception to the comment made that some people would like to delay this matter until it goes away forever.  Mayor Knudsen said that she supported Deputy Mayor Sedon’s suggestion that this matter be tabled until March 9, 2022.  This was agreed to by a majority of the Village Council.

 

5.         Amend Interlocal Agreement – Police Training Facility and Authorize Additional Participating Municipality (Waldwick)

 

Ms. Mailander explained that the Village of Ridgewood and several other Bergen County towns have been charter Participating Members of the Waldwick Police Training Facility for years, through an Interlocal Agreement with the Borough of Waldwick.  This allows members of the Ridgewood Police Department to use this facility for the range qualifications for each police officer.  There was a $25,000.00 capital contribution in the beginning, and each individual town pays an annual charge each year for the use of the range, based upon the number of officers using the range.  This year’s annual charge is $18,000.00.  Over the past two years, the Borough of Waldwick has upgraded the shooting range, classrooms and maintenance areas of the facility.


There are two proposed amendments to the Interlocal Agreement which must be agreed to by the original charter members.  The first one concerns the Borough of Saddle River, which was an original charter Participating Member, but went elsewhere, and now has requested to return to the Waldwick facility.  Ms. Mailander indicated that she spoke with Chief Luthcke, who is in favor of the Borough of Saddle River rejoining as a charter Participating Member since their police force is small. 


The second amendment is in regard to Non-Participating Member law enforcement agencies which have requested use of the Waldwick Police Training Facility for single days at a time.  This amendment will address the fact that the Non-Participating Members would be scheduled so that they do not conflict with any Participating Member’s use of the facility.  They would be limited to two days of use per agency per year.  They will be required to supply their own targets and other materials, and they would be required to provide an indemnification, hold harmless, and certificate of insurance.  They would be charged $500.00 per day, which will be applied to the Reserve for the Pistol Range – General Capital Fund.  It is felt that collecting $500.00 on days when none of the Participating Members are using the range would be beneficial for everyone.

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon moved that the Public Work Session be suspended and that a Special Public Meeting be convened.  Councilwoman Reynolds seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

AYES:          Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Sedon, Vagianos; Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:         None

ABSENT:    None

ABSTAIN:   None

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon moved that the Special Public Meeting be adjourned and that the Public Work Session be reconvened.  Councilwoman Reynolds seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

AYES:          Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Sedon, Vagianos; Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:         None

ABSENT:    None

ABSTAIN:   None

 

6.         DISCUSSION

 

            A.        RIDGEWOOD WATER

 

1.         Award Contract – Annual HVAC Maintenance Ridgewood Water and Village Hall

 

Ms. Mailander explained that the Village of Ridgewood accepted bid proposals for HVAC maintenance service for Ridgewood Water and Village Hall.  Two bids were picked up and one bid was received.  These services are necessary to maintain the heating, ventilation and cooling systems (HVAC) at Village Hall and various Ridgewood Water facilities.  Rich Calbi, Director of Ridgewood Water, is recommending the award of year one of a two-year contract to the sole responsible bidder, TM Brennan Services of Hamburg, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $55,000.00 for the 2022 service year.  This includes $19,500.00 for annual preventive maintenance.  The balance is being included as an allowance for repairs and replacements utilizing the hourly rates bid and fixed markups of 15% for items under $5,000.00 and 10% for items over $5,000.00.

 

Councilman Perron asked how this $55,000.00 is apportioned between Ridgewood Water and the Village.  Mr. Calbi indicated that he calculated this amount based on the number of units at each location.  He also considered the age of each HVAC unit and stated that the three units at Village Hall are the oldest.  There are seven units at the Ridgewood Water facilities, which are all very new.

 

2.         Award Cooperative Purchasing Contract – Maintenance of Various Backup Generators

 

Ms. Mailander explained that is a proposed resolution for a maintenance agreement for various backup generators under the Sourcewell (NJPA) Cooperative Pricing System.  The Village of Ridgewood and Ridgewood Water anticipate exceeding the statutory limit of $17,500.00 for this maintenance contract and a Council resolution is needed to continuing purchasing the maintenance agreement.  The contract will be awarded to Cummins, Inc., of Kearny, New Jersey, in an amount not to exceed $47,535.24.  A total of 14 auxiliary power generators exist in the Ridgewood Water system.  Each generator is similar to a large truck engine and requires annual maintenance to ensure its continued operation.  Fuel often becomes stagnant in generators from non-use, so the proposed maintenance would include a “fuel polishing” service to maintain quality and avoid engine damage.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked for clarification of “fuel polishing.”  Mr. Calbi replied that generators only run when they are needed and, therefore, the fuel just sits for a majority of the time in the generator.  Amendments are sometimes added to the fuel for testing to ensure that the fuel has not become contaminated; in this way, the generators can be used when needed.  Fuel polishing is performed on an as-needed basis.

 

Councilwoman Perron also asked about Mr. Calbi’s memo wherein it was stated that this maintenance agreement would be paid out of the Water Department’s Operating Budget.  However, she did not see where this was mentioned in the proposed resolution and she felt the resolution needed to be clearer in that regard.  Mr. Calbi indicated that that can certainly be added to the resolution.  Ms. Mailander stated that the account number will be added to the resolution as well.

 

3.         Authorize Agreement with Bergen County – Greenwood Avenue Bridge Project Midland Park

 

Ms. Mailander explained that Bergen County has contracted to replace the Greenwood Avenue bridge in Midland Park.  Ridgewood Water has a water main running under the bridge and, in order to facilitate the bridge replacement, the water main must be bypassed during construction and then replaced with new piping.  Ridgewood Water and the County of Bergen Department of Planning & Engineering would like to enter into an agreement to replace the water main at this location whereby the County’s contractor will replace the water main and the Village will pay for it.  The cost is estimated not to exceed $100,000.00.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked if this particular water main needed to be replaced anyway.  Mr. Calbi replied that he did not know but that he could find out the age of the water main and the materials used when it was constructed.  He indicated that the County contacted the Village several months ago.  Part of this work is being funded by a grant received by the County.

 

Mayor Knudsen questioned spending $100,000.00 when no one knows whether or not the water main even needs to be replaced.  Mr. Calbi stated that this is the cost that Bergen County estimates for the replacement of the water main.  The grant which they received is only for replacement of the bridge itself.  Deputy Mayor Sedon remarked that it doesn’t matter how old the water main is but that it has to be replaced regardless because the bridge is being replaced. 

 

Mayor Knudsen asked if the language in the Village’s resolution will be revised to conform with the County’s resolution.  Ms. Mailander confirmed that it would.  Mr. Calbi said that some changes need to be made in the resolution because there are some errors, i.e., paragraph two where it states that the work is being done by Ridgewood Water instead of Bergen County.

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that she wanted Mr. Calbi to comment on the lead pipe letter that has gone out to several Ridgewood Water customers.  Mr. Calbi indicated that Governor Murphy signed a new law last year that requires that all lead service and galvanized lines be replaced within a ten-year period.  Mr. Calbi estimated that there were about 150 lead service lines in the Ridgewood Water system; adding galvanized lines increases this number significantly.  The law required all water utilities to submit an inventory of their pipe infrastructure, which was completed and submitted to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP).  Based on that initial inventory, there are a total of 1,119 qualified lead service and galvanized lines in all four municipalities served by Ridgewood Water.  These lines can be either on the utility side or the homeowner’s side, or a combination of both.  There are also 3,800 lines that are “unknown” at the present time and it must be determined what materials were used to construct these lines.

 

Mr. Calbi indicated that the law also required that Ridgewood Water send certified letters to every property owner or tenant of a property, within 30 days of the inventory being submitted, notifying them that that service exists on their property or if they are connected to a portion of the Ridgewood Water system that contains either lead or galvanized lines.  Those letters had to be sent out by February 21, 2022 and Ridgewood Water met the deadline.  The majority of residents have already received these letters, because Ridgewood Water has begun receiving phone calls about this issue.  The letter simply puts homeowners on notice.  The State of New Jersey wants to ensure that homeowners are aware of these lead and galvanized pipes and that homeowners have options to abate the lead effects, i.e., by ensuring that their water is filtered and/or that the lead or galvanized lines are eventually replaced. 

 

Mr. Calbi stated that it is Ridgewood Water’s responsibility to replace all of those lines within ten years, whether utility- or privately-owned.  Ridgewood Water is developing a plan to accomplish this project, which must be submitted by July 2022.  All four municipalities must approve ordinances that give Ridgewood Water access to private property and appropriate funding for the project.  This is necessary because funds of a local utility are not allowed to be used for any type of private improvement.  Mr. Calbi mentioned that this pipe replacement project has been successfully accomplished in the City of Newark. 

 

Mr. Calbi emphasized that he wanted homeowners to know that nothing has changed with the water, which is the same as it was prior to these homeowners receiving these letters.  For the past seven years, Ridgewood Water has been treating the system with a corrosion inhibitor in the water to make sure that lead is not leeched out of the piping.  This has proven successful since their last round of sample testing performed at residences showed no detection of lead in the water.  Nevertheless, homeowners who have this type of lead or galvanized piping still may want to take precautions.  Residents served by Ridgewood Water are welcomed to drop off a bottle of their water for testing, with results shared directly with the homeowners.

 

Mr. Calbi said that the funding has to be figured out for this immense project.  This is occurring “on the heels” of dealing with the costs associated with the PFOAs issue in the water.  He mentioned that the pipe replacement project could easily translate into a $15 million capital investment over the next ten years.  Some money for same has been requested in their budget this year.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked about lines that run from homes to the street.  Mr. Calbi said that Ridgewood Water is required to replace such lines according to the law.  Councilwoman Reynolds asked if this would be done at no cost to the homeowner.  Mr. Calbi replied that there are two options for government utilities.  It is either totally paid for by the utility and the cost absorbed by all rate payers, or the property owner is assessed for the cost.  Mr. Calbi said this latter option would be difficult for Ridgewood Water because they are only the “assessor” in Ridgewood, not in the other three municipalities that are involved.  Mr. Calbi said that the easiest way to accomplish this project is to go house by house, block by block, and get the work done, which is the way it was done successfully in Newark. 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked if sidewalks, lawns and driveways would have to get ripped up in order to perform this work and, if so, who would repair the damage to bring the property back to its original condition.  Mr. Calbi replied that “it is a little bit of both.”  He hopes that, in most cases, this work can be performed “trenchlessly.”  It could possibly be done with just a couple of holes, depending on the length of the pipe leading to the home.

 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked what would occur if the line coming out of the house is copper but then it connects to either lead or galvanized piping at the curb stop out to the street.  Mr. Calbi replied that only the lead or galvanized sections would be replaced and, in fact, they have already begin such work.  Homeowners are first notified that the work will be done, and usually the replacement is completed within a day.

 

Ms. Mailander stated that it was important to note that the content of the letters regarding the pipe replacement and precautions sent out by Ridgewood Water are all statutory.  It is a “given” that most households in New Jersey will be receiving such a letter.  There are options which a homeowner may pursue; however, it is not a requirement, such as a boil water advisory or use of bottled water only.  Mr. Calbi acknowledged that the wording in these letters can be a “little scary,” but he stated that the letters contain prescribed language mandated by the NJDEP.  Both Ridgewood Water and the NJDEP have information on their respective websites which explains all of the points contained in the letter.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked about the 1,119 homes identified in the four municipalities as having either lead or galvanized piping.  She asked if this is the total number of letters that were sent out.  Mr. Calbi replied that more letters went out than that because, in some cases, if a home was tenant occupied, then both the tenant and owner had to be notified.  There are a lot of “unknowns” at the current time, so more letters will likely be sent. 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked how they determine what materials comprise an “unknown” pipe system. Mr. Calbi replied that they are physically digging holes, small test pits, and it is estimated that this will take up to 18 months to finish that work.  He indicated that he tried to get the time extended within which the inventory could be completed, but it was not approved.  He stated that his department is in “good shape” and that most water utilities have not even begun their inventory. 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked if a homeowner could call Mr. Calbi to find out what kind of piping they have at their home.  Mr. Calbi replied that homeowners can either call or visit their website because they have an interactive map on the website where a homeowner can type in their address and view whether the material of their pipes is known or unknown, date installed, etc.  The website is water.ridgewoodnj.net.  The release on the lead notice and inventory, as well as the map, can be found under the tab labeled “Latest News.”

 

            B.        PARKING

 

1.         Extended Parking in Central Business District

 

Ms. Mailander explained that this is a resolution for extended parking in the CBD.  There have been requests for parking permits to allow residents of the CBD to park in various locations 24/7/365.  Mr. Rooney has done an analysis, which shows that, assuming a 100% occupancy, the potential annual revenue for an off-street parking space and an annual overnight parking permit amounts to $3,316.00.  The Ridgewood Premium Parking Permit is $1,325.00 per year and the annual fee for overnight parking is $300.00, for an annual total of $1,625.00. 

 

It is recommended that a pilot program be implemented through December 31, 2022, whereby six reserved parking spaces would be designated in the Cottage Place lot and six reserved parking spaces in the Hudson Street Garage on the third floor, for those wishing to purchase a permit for reserved parking 24/7/365 in one of those two places.  This would allocate the parking space to a specific Ridgewood resident or landlord of a residential home or apartment.  Therefore, it may not necessarily be someone who lives in the CBD; it could be someone who lives in another area of the Village.  These reserved parking spaces would only be available for Ridgewood residents and would not be available to businesses. 

 

The recommended price would be $2,100.00 annually for the Cottage Place Lot ($175.00/month) or $2,400.00 for the Hudson Street Garage ($200.00/month since it offers covered parking).  These prices are far less than the potential annual revenue ($3,316.00) for one of these parking spaces.  The price for these parking permits would be prorated, based on the month of purchase, as is the practice with all of the Village’s parking permits.

 

Councilman Vagianos said that he needed to recuse himself from the discussion on this matter.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked what the proposal was from the two residents who brought up the need to have parking permits for residents who live in the CBD.  Ms. Mailander indicated that these residents said that they researched the parking situation in other towns and stated that some towns either allow free parking or only charge $100.00 a year.  Ms. Mailander said that those options are not realistic at this time since the Village needs the revenue to support the Parking Utility.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked where a resident would park if they lived in an apartment in the CBD which was not afforded a parking space.  Ms. Mailander replied that such a resident could park in the Cottage Place lot all day and then find another spot to park overnight (Hudson Street Garage, Prospect Street lot, and Garber Square).  Councilwoman Reynolds asked what this would cost a resident.  Ms. Mailander replied that, at the current time, the resident would need to pay $1/hour in the Cottage Place lot and then pay for overnight parking somewhere else ($300.00 a year, $150.00 for six months).  There is no permit presently which a resident could purchase for 24/7/365 parking.   Councilwoman Reynolds said that she would like to see more revenue generated for the Hudson Street Garage.

 

There was a discussion regarding the advantages to a CBD resident paying $1,625.00 per year (Ridgewood Premium Parking Permit plus overnight parking) where they would not be guaranteed a spot, as opposed to paying $2,100.00 and $2,400.00 for the Cottage Place lot and Hudson Street Garage, respectively, where they would be guaranteed a reserved spot.  There was a discussion about possibly bundling the costs for the parking permit and overnight parking together at $1,625.00 per year rather than placing a premium on the reserved parking spaces this year.  The cost for these reserved spaces could possibly then be raised next year. 

 

Mayor Knudsen said that they should start with the lower figure of $1,625.00 to begin with in order to gauge interest.  Councilwoman Reynolds and Councilwoman Perron agreed with Mayor Knudsen.  However, it was suggested that the charge for the reserved spaces at the Hudson Street Garage be $1,625.00 since it offers covered parking and that the charge at the Cottage Place lot be set at $1,300.00. 

 

There was a discussion as to whether or not these spots should first be offered to residents who live in the CBD and then a month later open it up to everyone else.  Mayor Knudsen felt that it should be opened up to everyone initially in order to be fair.  There was mention of the fact that the world will soon be “opening up” after Covid and many people will be shopping and dining in the CBD, and parking spaces need to be made available.  It was decided by a majority of the Village Council that the reserved spaces will be opened up to all residents at the lower fees suggested.

 

C.        BUDGET

 

1.         Declare Surplus – International Truck - Streets

 

Ms. Mailander explained that this is a resolution to declare a 2015 International 7400 truck used by the Department of Public Works – Streets Division as surplus property.  This truck has had issues; in fact, four others of the same model in the fleet continuously have engine problems.  These trucks are actually too light for the duties required.  Although the truck in question has low mileage (43,222 miles), the engine is blown and needs extensive repairs.  The cost of the repairs is not viable, given that the repairs may not provide a reasonable service life.  This truck may be disposed of after it is declared as surplus property.  This International series of trucks will be replaced with Kenworth trucks, which are more reliable.

 

            D.        POLICY

 

1.         Sanitary Sewer Service Connection Fees

 

Ms. Mailander said that this resolution deals with sanitary sewer service connection fees.  The Village recently increased the sewer service fees.  The sewer connection fees for connection to the Village’s sanitary sewer collection system have not increased since 2018. Ms. Mailander explained that some parts of the Fee Ordinance have not been adjusted since 2009.  Connection fees are a one-time fee  Annual service charges will still apply to any new connections from outside of the Village. 

 

It is proposed that the connection fee for each residential dwelling unit in Ridgewood be increased from $6,000.00 to $6,500.00, and that the connection fee for all nonresidential development be increased from $6,000.00 to $6,500.00 up to 6,000 square feet of gross floor area; from $.75 to $1.00 per square foot for each square foot of gross floor area over 6,000 square feet; and from $5,000.00 to $7,000.00 per dwelling unit in a town adjacent to Ridgewood with an executed interlocal services agreement with Ridgewood for collection and treatment and treatment services for domestic sanitary sewage.  For each EDU or part thereof, the fee would increase from $200.00 to $250.00.  These recommendations are being made by Mr. Rutishauser, Village Engineer.

 

2.         Replacement of Blue Spruce for Thuja Green Giant Trees at Schedler

 

Ms. Mailander explained that the Village had initially proposed to plant blue spruce trees on the berm at the Schedler property.  However, these trees were suffering from needle drop disease.  Therefore, the Village would like to replace these trees with Thuja Green Giant trees.  The Village Arborist, Declan Madden, CTE, has agreed with the proposed replacement.  The Thuja Green Giant trees were used for screening plantings at the Habernickel Family Park very successfully and they are also deer tolerant.  SHPO was contacted to make sure that they are aware of this replacement and to request permission to make the tree substitution, and they have approved it.

 

3.         Selection of Energy Consultant - EAGER

 

Councilwoman Perron indicated that the next step in the EAGER (Encouraging Alternative Green Energy for Ridgewood) process, since the Village Council passed an Ordinance establishing a government energy aggregation program, is to select an energy consultant to guide the Village through the process of hiring a third-party contractor.  Sustainable Jersey suggests that the Village go out to bid, even though it is technically a professional contract and, therefore, the Village doesn’t have to go out to bid.  Ridgewood has hired Gable Associates in the past for other tasks, and they are the energy consultants who spoke before the Village Council in January 2021 concerning the proposed energy aggregation program. 

 

Councilwoman Perron recommends that the Village send out a Request for Proposal (RFP).  The Village does not pay the consultant directly; the third-party contractor would compensate the consultant.  However, the energy consultant’s fee would be “folded into” the third-party supplier’s energy price to Village residents.  This “fee” will be set forth very clearly in the RFPs received.  Councilwoman Perron said that the subcommittee of Green Ridgewood has worked up a matrix of questions that could be posed to any bidders.  All Councilmembers agreed to proceed with the RFP.

 

4          Proposed Revisions to Tree Ordinance

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that this item pertains to the proposed revisions to the Tree Ordinance.  She indicated that the Village Council would be starting at Chapter 260-7, “Permit Requirements for Tree Removal.”  Mayor Knudsen asked if everyone had read the proposed agreement and everyone indicated that they had done so.  She asked if anyone had any questions, comments or concerns about anything contained within the Ordinance. 

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon said that the “Annual Exempt Tree” clause contained in Section 260-8H should be removed because there are enough “outs” for people to remove trees (disease, dying, dangerous to people and property).  Mayor Knudsen, Councilwoman Perron, and Councilwoman Reynolds all agreed with Deputy Mayor Sedon.  Councilman Vagianos said that he would be the only one dissenting on this clause.

 

Mayor Knudsen said that there were several questions raised by Village Councilmembers which arose during the preliminary discussion of this Ordinance that needed to be answered or clarified by Mr. Rutishauser.  In Section 260-4B, there was a question about the wording “unless the Director of the Department of Public Works or their authorized designee has issued a permit to do so.”  The Village Council was not sure what those circumstances would be.  Mr. Rutishauser indicated that if the tree in question is dead and the homeowner needs to widen their driveway, and if this is being done with Zoning Board approval, he doesn’t see why this shouldn’t be allowed. 

 

Mr. Rutishauser said that his department has occasionally encountered contractors who take it upon themselves to hack away at tree roots because they are constructing a sidewalk.  That was the reason for creating this particular clause (260-4B).

 

In Section 260-5E, Councilwoman Perron said that there was some question about the phrase “injurious chemicals.”  Mr. Rutishauser said that “injurious chemicals” could include salt water, bleach, or gasoline.  Councilwoman Perron said that she felt that term was appropriate.  Mr. Rutishauser said that there are some people who will use “underhanded means” to diminish the quality of a tree so that its removal would be warranted.  If there is evidence of such a situation, this paragraph would address that issue and allow for summonses to be issued.

 

In Section 260-6C, there is a sentence which reads, “Defective sidewalk slabs within 5.0 feet of a tree shall be removed, and a new slab cast in accordance with the Village Arborist’s directive.”  Mr. Rutishauser explained that there are a lot of uplifted sidewalk slabs near trees in the Village.  The Village Arborist was concerned that slabs would just be picked up, the roots ground up, and the old sidewalk slab replaced.  He would much prefer the homeowner to construct a “bump out” or “round out” when warranted to give the tree a better chance of survival. 

 

It was pointed out by Councilwoman Perron that the language in this paragraph permits a sidewalk slab to be reinstalled if it is not defective.  Mr. Rutishauser said that upheaval over ¼” or 3/8” of a sidewalk slab is considered a defect.  He said the proper way to correct this defect would be for a property owner to hire a contractor, obtain a permit, remove the defective slab, contact the Parks and Recreation Department to coordinate a time when the roots of the tree can be grinded, and then a new slab installed.  He mentioned that sometimes a tree must be removed completely because grinding its roots would make the tree unsafe and susceptible to wind storm damage.

 

Deputy Mayor Sedon remarked that, according to his conversations with the Village Arborist, sometimes the arborist doesn’t have the authority to tell a property owner that they must do a round out or a bump out around a tree.  If the property owner refuses to do a round out or a bump out and wants to just grind the tree roots and replace the old sidewalk slab, this could result in a perfectly healthy tree eventually dying and needing to be removed.  Deputy Mayor Sedon said that he felt that paragraph 260-6C gives the Village Arborist the authority to tell a homeowner that the original slab cannot be replaced because it is too close to a tree and that they must construct either a round out or bump out.

 

Mayor Knudsen asked if a round out or bump out resulted in a higher cost to the homeowner.  She didn’t think it was fair to a homeowner to have to pay extra for a round out or bump out if their sidewalk was perfectly fine to begin with but was then eventually uprooted by a tree which the Village had planted by their home.  Mr. Rutishauser agreed but stated that the overall goal of this Ordinance is to preserve as many trees as possible in the Village.  Mayor Knudsen said she agreed but that she is concerned that a homeowner may not be able to afford such sidewalk construction.

 

Councilwoman Perron said that the Councilmembers at the last discussion thought that paragraph 260-6D was redundant and felt it should be omitted.  It reads, “Any tree roots cut or removed in the public right-of-way without the Village Arborist’s or their designee’s authorization shall be deemed a violation of this Chapter.”  However, Mr. Rutishauser thinks this paragraph is important and should be left in the Ordinance because this section deals with sidewalk construction and driveway enlargement.

 

Regarding the wording in Section 260-5G which reads “conditions surrounding a tree,” the Councilmembers wanted clarification on what kind of conditions surrounding a tree could be manipulated so that it would threaten the viability of a tree.  Mr. Rutishauser explained that “conditions surrounding a tree” could simply involve someone filling the area around a tree with dirt or mulch and covering up the roots.  He explained that this is a problem in many larger-scale subdivisions with new homes.  Many times developers put soil over the roots of a tree which causes slow suffocation of the roots and the tree dies within a couple of years.  If there was evidence that this was deliberately done with malicious intent to destroy the tree, this paragraph would allow the Village to take appropriate action to protect the tree.

 

In Section 260-5I dealing with decorative lights strung on a tree, there was felt to be a need for further discussion.  It was Councilwoman Perron’s feeling that this particular paragraph places a lot of burden on Village administration and she would simplify it to say that no decorative lights can be hung on any public right-of-way trees.  Mayor Knudsen agreed that lights on a tree look pretty in the CBD, but that this needs to be monitored because the tree can die if the lights remain on the tree for a long period of time.  She feels that this would be impossible to monitor and it is easier to just say “don’t do it.” 

 

Mr. Rutishauser agreed with Mayor Knudsen that it is just easier to say no.  He said that during a survey of trees one year, he found trees with lights in them that had been there for over a year and actually started to grow into the tree, to the detriment of the tree. 

 

Mayor Knudsen stated that the paragraph should simply read, “No decorative lights shall be strung or affixed on any tree within the public right-of-way or on public property” and remove the remainder of the paragraph.  Councilwoman Perron and Ms. Mailander felt that the last line in that paragraph should remain:  “Decorative lights installed in trees as part of a Village sponsored or approved project shall be exempt from this permit requirements [sic].”  It was agreed that that sentence would end at the word “exempt” since no permit is applicable.  Ms. Mailander mentioned the trees in Memorial Park at Van Neste Square. 

 

Mayor Knudsen asked how one would procedurally arrange to install such lights as part of a Village sponsored or approved project.  Mr. Rutishauser said that the same procedure could be followed as was done for the up-lighting in Van Neste Square.  A presentation was made before the Village Council and a Title 59 Resolution was adopted wherein the Council agreed to what was presented and sanctioned that action. 

 

Ms. Mailander reminded everyone about the “Downtown for the Holidays” Christmas event when the trees are lit up at the train station and in the park.  She questioned whether the Village Council would have to hear such a request every year.  Mr. Rogers suggested that something be done similar to how the Village handles gift issues, leaving it to the Village Manager to make a decision, referring any concerns to the Village Attorney for approval. 

 

Councilman Vagianos agreed with Mr. Rogers and stated that Village sponsored events should be within the purview of the Village Manager and shouldn’t have to be dealt with by the entire Village Council.  He said the main question is whether or not the Village wants store owners in the CBD to put lights on trees during events on a temporary basis. 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds stated that she really loved the lights in the downtown area.  Putting time constraints on when lights could be installed and need to be taken down was suggested by Councilwoman Reynolds.  She believes that festive lighting entices people to visit the downtown area to shop and dine.  Mayor Knudsen said that there are plenty of ways to decorate without putting lights in trees and Deputy Mayor Sedon agreed, adding that this would be hard to monitor and enforce.  Councilman Vagianos stated that he didn’t feel this would be hard to monitor.

 

Mayor Knudsen suggested that perhaps Ms. Mailander could work with the Chamber of Commerce to determine dates on which lights can be hung and must be removed, with the Chamber then sending out notices to various businesses in the CBD stating the dates when tree lighting would be permitted, followed up with a warning to businesses that they will be ticketed  if they do not comply.  Deputy Mayor Sedon remarked that not every business in Ridgewood is a member of the Chamber of Commerce. 

 

Mr. Rogers reiterated that he thought it best if any decisions regarding tree lighting rest with the Village Manager.  Ms. Mailander felt that it would be better to announce the dates to business owners and Councilman Vagianos agreed.  If dates are written in the Ordinance, then summonses can be issued for violations; otherwise, it would be tough to enforce.  Suggested dates were from November 15 to January 15 of any given year.  Mr. Rutishauser will work on the revised wording for this paragraph.

 

Regarding Section 260-4B, Mr. Rogers asked if the permit referenced in that paragraph is the same one as referenced in Section 260-7.  Mr. Rutishauser said that he would research this and get back to Mr. Rogers.  It was decided that this matter would be further discussed at the Work Session Meeting on March 2, 2022, for planned introduction on March 9, 2022.

 

E.        OPERATIONS

 

                        1.         Update of Zoning Map

 

Ms. Mailander explained that the update of the zoning map has been developed by the Engineering Department and Village Planner.  There is a proposed Ordinance to be approved by the Village Council to memorialize the revised zoning map.  The previous update of the zoning map was done in June 2012.  Mr. Rutishauser indicated that updates included the 2020 AH Zone and better clarification of district boundary lines.  Maryann Bucci-Carter, Planner for the Planning Board, worked with Jovan Mehandzic from the Engineering Office to make these corrections and provide an updated zoning map. 

 

Mayor Knudsen thought it would be helpful to send the revised zoning map in PDF format to everyone via email so that it would be easier to read.  This matter will be discussed again at the Work Session on March 2, 2022.  Mayor Knudsen asked if Mr. Rutishauser outlined the changes to the zoning map.  Mr. Rutishauser said that he had not, although he did print out some emails from Ms. Bucci-Carter on which he was copied.  There was a lot of back-and-forth discussion.  One change dealt with 320 Franklin Avenue (Bank of America) regarding the exit:  the tax map has it in a transition zone and Fair Share has it in a B-2 zone.  This was clarified.

 

Mr. Rutishauser indicated that he would ask Ms. Bucci-Carter to create a list with bullet points listing some of the pertinent changes made to the zoning map.  Ms. Bucci-Carter also conferred with Beth McManus regarding changes to the zoning map.  Mayor Knudsen asked Mr. Rutishauser to clarify the zones marked B-3, B-3R and B-3AH to avoid confusion.  Mr. Rutishauser said he would have Ms. Bucci-Carter check out those zones tomorrow.  Councilwoman Perron pointed out a typo.

 

2.         Gypsy/Kings Pond Area Cleanup Program – Ridgewood Wildscape Association

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that this item deals with the cleanup program at Gypsy/Kings Pond by the Ridgewood Wildscape Association and the Ridgewood High School Green Club.  It will be held on Sunday, May 1, 2022 between 1:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M.   This will be the fourteenth year that this has been done.  The Village will provide chest waders, gloves, and other personal protective equipment, as well as rakes and hand tools, and will pick up and dispose of the accumulated debris.

 

Councilwoman Perron indicated that she spoke with Ellie Gruber to let her know the Rotary AM Club is interested in some kind of hands-on project, and Ms. Gruber invited them to join the group.  Mr. Rutishauser asked if she wanted him to change the resolution to include the Rotary AM Club.  Councilwoman Perron said that she had not yet heard back from the Rotary AM Club.  Ms. Mailander indicated that the Rotary AM Club can join in the cleanup anyway, even if they’re not named in the resolution.

 

7.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Lillian Blood, 250 North Maple Avenue, said that the problem surrounding the pickleball courts is not one of noise.  She stated that she and her friends have been playing there even during winter; however, this past Monday when the weather was warmer, they all went to Glen Rock to play.  This was because playing pickleball on Monday is prohibited in Ridgewood.  There were five courts filled to capacity, with people waiting to play on the sidelines.  She asked why people thought the sound was different on a Sunday than it was on a Monday.  She urged that the courts be opened up during the week so that people can play on Mondays and Fridays.  This doesn’t have to wait until the new sound panels are installed. 

 

Ms. Blood stated that the sound of the pickleballs do not go beyond Simon Lee’s house.  She said that she parks on his street and she cannot hear anything.  She said that people young and old get outside and get exercise, and it is just sad that the courts are closed on a couple of days during the week.  She asked the Village Council to consider allowing the courts to be open on Mondays and Fridays so that people who can’t play pickleball on the other days can play on either a Monday or Friday.

 

Rurik Halaby, 1 Franklin Avenue, said that he is disgusted with the Village Council and that Mayor Knudsen will try “every trick in the book” to make sure that something doesn’t happen.  He witnessed this with the HealthBarn, One Village One Vote, and now with the pickleball issue. He stated that her description of the movement of sound was “really silly.”  He said that “arm wrestling” this matter on and on is ridiculous.  He said that the wasted time, talent and energy he has witnessed over the past six years is ridiculous.  There are more important matters in the Village which must be addressed, pedestrian safety being one of them.

 

Mr. Halaby asked Mayor Knudsen and Councilwoman Reynolds whether they got permission from Ms. Bigos before contacting the salesman for the sound panels.  He said that if they went behind her back, they were trying to undermine the process.  Mr. Halaby said that this town needs a change, one being a scenario where the Councilmembers are elected and then they choose who the Mayor will be.  In this way, the Mayor can be “unselected” if necessary.  He said that Ridgewood doesn’t need another “Putin.”

 

Mayor Knudsen said she felt it is the job of the Village Council to not just do everything in “lock step” but that it is alright to disagree with one another.  It is alright to do one’s own research, and it is alright to ask questions.  Anyone who thinks it is not appropriate to ask questions or seek further information is engaging in a disservice to the Village community whose tax dollars the Village Council is charged with spending wisely and prudently.  She stated that $24,000.00 is a lot of money and she will call whomever she needs to in order to find out more information if necessary.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.         ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Deputy Mayor Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Reynolds, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Work Session was adjourned at 10:05 P.M.

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                           

                                                                                                Susan Knudsen

                                                                                                           Mayor

 

 

                                                                       

Eileen Young

Deputy Village Clerk

  • Hits: 636

A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, ON FEBRUARY 23, 2022 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

1.         CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL

 

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 8:42 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act.  At roll call the following were present:  Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Sedon, and Vagianos; and Mayor Knudsen.  Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Eileen Young, Deputy Village Clerk; and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney.

 

2.         RESOLUTIONS

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that the following resolutions, numbered 22-75 through 22-79, with the exception of resolution 22-78, which has been removed from the agenda, are to be adopted by a consent agenda, with one vote by the Village Council, and would be read by title only:

There was a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Reynolds, that these resolutions be adopted.

 

Roll Call Vote

AYES:          Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Sedon, Vagianos; Mayor Knudsen

NAYS:         None

ABSENT:    None

ABSTAIN:   None

 

3.         ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Village Council on a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Reynolds, the Special Public Meeting was adjourned at 8:45 P.M. and the Public Work Session was reconvened.

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                Susan Knudsen

       Mayor

 

                                                                       

Eileen Young

Deputy Village Clerk

  • Hits: 591

A SPECIAL PUBLIC BUDGET MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, ON FEBRUARY 16, 2022 AT 5:00 PM

 

1.         CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

 

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 5:02 PM and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act.  At roll call the following were present:  Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Sedon, Vagianos; and Mayor Knudsen.  Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Eileen Young, Deputy Village Clerk; Robert G. Rooney, Chief Financial Officer/Parking Utility Director; Steve Sanzari, Treasurer; and Olivia DiMitri, Senior Account Clerk.

 

Mayor Knudsen led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and asked for a moment of silence for men and women serving our nation, all of Ridgewood’s first responders, and all victims of violent crimes.

 

2.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Mayor Knudsen asked if there were any comments from the public at this time.

 

Chris Houghton, 460 Grove Street, stated that he was speaking in support of the Shade Tree Commission budget for the restoration, preservation, and expansion of the tree campaign in the Village, especially to preserve the canopy enjoyed by residents.  He has lived in Ridgewood for 36 years and he and his wife have raised two children in the Village.  His children are now grown, but have enjoyed the facilities that Ridgewood has offered over the years.  Over the years, he has witnessed the loss of many large trees on his property and property surrounding his neighborhood, due to wind storms, flooding, lightning strikes, and disease. 

 

Mr. Houghton added that he has noticed unauthorized removal of trees in the Village by unknown parties. He spoke about the value of trees and urged the Village Council to support the requested budget of the Shade Tree Commission in order to replace the lost trees and expand the planting of trees in the Village.  He offered to lead a “tour” for anyone interested in viewing the various trees lost around the Village.

 

Andrew Lowry, 441 Hawthorne Place, said that he is a member of the Shade Tree Commission and is speaking this evening to support the need to increase tree plantings in the Village.  He spoke about global warming, invasive insects such as the emerald ash borer, and historical underfunding, all of which have affected and created challenges for the shade tree population. 

 

Mr. Lowry indicated that the proposed budget is a good first step towards replenishing the shade trees in the Village due to the many trees lost over the years.  He mentioned the emerald ash borer and stated that he wasn’t sure how many ash trees would be lost this year due to this invasive insect, but estimated that it would amount to approximately 100 ash trees being removed.  He spoke about replanting in the tree wells in the Central Business District (CBD).  Various tree planting projects which are planned will help to get the Village “back on track” towards strengthening its tree infrastructure.

 

In addition to planting more trees, Mr. Lowry indicated that it is crucial to take care of the existing trees in the Village.  He praised the quality and hard work of the “tree crew” and indicated that the Village has sufficient equipment to maintain the existing trees; however, most of the workers’ time is spent taking down trees which are diseased, fallen, or damaged due to storms and not on pruning or maintenance of the trees.  The Village Arborist spends about 30% of his time working on other tasks such as leaf collection, snow removal, picking up Christmas trees during the season, etc., and Mr. Lowry stated that it would be wonderful if the Village Arborist could spent 100% of his time maintaining the trees in the Village.  In conclusion, Mr. Lowry urged the Village Council to approve the requested budget for the Shade Tree Commission so that the tree infrastructure in the Village can be preserved.

 

Cynthia Halaby, 1 Franklin Avenue, said she was speaking this evening as President of the Conservancy for Ridgewood Public Lands.  She spoke about the Conservancy’s gift to Ridgewood of additional lighting in Memorial Park at Van Neste Square.  The Conservancy has been in existence for the last 10 years and, during that time, they have raised approximately $100,000.00 in donations from residents and friends to enhance and improve the parklands in Ridgewood.

 

Ms. Halaby emphasized that the Conservancy could not have accomplished their goals without the full support, cooperation and hard work of the Village’s Parks and Recreation Department.  Ms. Bigos, her office staff, and the grounds crew comprise a remarkable team, and Ms. Halaby stated that Ms. Bigos deserves a lot of credit for her dedication, relentless work and vision for all Village residents.  The pandemic has caused families to spend more time outdoors engaging in recreational activities that have become a vital part of their lives.  Enhancing recreational areas in Ridgewood makes the Village more “inviting” to both residents and visitors.

 

Ms. Halaby stated that the staff of the Parks and Recreation Department works very hard to maintain Village properties and it is imperative that these areas be kept clean, attractive and safe. She urged the Village Council to support the budget of the Parks and Recreation Department so that they can continue to make Ridgewood look its “very best.”

 

Anthea Luter, 481 Knollwood, said that she was speaking tonight as past President and longtime member of the Women Gardeners of Ridgewood.  She wanted to lend support to the budget presented by the Parks and Recreation Department.  On behalf of the Women Gardeners of Ridgewood, Ms. Luter thanked the dedicated staff of the Parks and Recreation Department for their work in making the fields safe for the youth of Ridgewood and for their help assisting the Women Gardeners of Ridgewood carry out their mission of bringing the love of gardening and nature to the next generation.  The surroundings at the Stable provide a “wonderland” for exploration and present the perfect opportunity to open the minds and hearts of the children attending the Green Kids Program.  For the past 15+ years, the Women Gardeners of Ridgewood have forged a partnership with the Parks and Recreation Department to challenge, explore and transfer their passions to the youth of Ridgewood.

 

Gail McCarthy, 153 Hope Street, said that she was speaking this evening representing the Kasschau Shell Committee.  This summer will be their 64th season of bringing entertainment to the residents of, and visitors to, Ridgewood.  They have 19 concerts planned for this summer of varying genres.  Despite the pandemic over the past two years, people have observed social distancing and enjoyed the many performances at the Kasschau Bandshell.

 

Ms. McCarthy asked the Village Council to consider the granting of funds for the Kasschau Shell Committee, as has been done in the past.  She explained that they strive to find sponsorships to match the funds allotted to them by the Village, approximately in the range of $9,000 to $10,000 each year.  Ms. McCarthy indicated that improvements are needed to the Kasschau Shell (plaster work and painting) and she asked the Village Council to approve funds for the Committee to accomplish these improvements.  She looks forward to a wonderful summer and asked everyone to check out the performance schedule on social media (Facebook, Instagram, and GroupSpot).

 

There were no further comments from the public.

 

Mayor Knudsen thanked the Shade Tree Commission, Women Gardeners of Ridgewood, the Kasschau Shell Committee, and the Conservancy for Ridgewood Public Lands for their comments this evening.  She inquired how the Village could investigate the “unauthorized removal of trees” brought up by Mr. Houghton.  She asked Ms. Mailander if there was a way to find out who was removing these trees and what the actual violation would be in this instance.

 

3.         INTRODUCTION OF 2022 BUDGET PROCESS – VILLAGE MANAGER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

Ms. Mailander welcomed everyone to the first night of the budget meetings.  Future budget meetings will be held on February 17, 2022, February 25, 2022 and February 28, 2022, all beginning at 5:00 PM.  Ms. Mailander explained the budget development process.  Department Directors start to develop their proposed Operating Budgets in July of the current year and present them around Labor Day, after which time the Village Treasurer, Steve Sanzari, and the Village Chief Financial Officer, Robert G. Rooney, review same and meet with the various department heads.  Clarifications are made, if necessary, between October and December, and then Ms. Mailander meets with Mr. Rooney, Mr. Sanzari, and the Department Directors to try to “whittle down” the budgets as much as possible.  The final review is done sometime in January.  The budgets presented this evening and throughout the budget meetings are “refined” budgets from the originals.

 

Regarding the Capital Budget, this is developed at a meeting with all Department Directors   It is up to the Department Directors to decide which capital projects they wish to prioritize and which projects they feel can be done in the future, or which vehicles they feel can be retained for another year, etc.  The Village Council can request either an increase or a decrease in both the Capital and Operating Budgets for a particular department.

 

Mr. Rooney thanked all the Department Directors and their staff for their support throughout the budget development process, which he stated is very time consuming.  He also thanked the Finance Department, his “unsung heroes,” for their help and support, especially Mr. Sanzari (Treasurer); Olivia DiMitri; Michelle and Dana in the Payroll Department; Jessica, the Tax Collector, and her assistant Nicole; Ms. Mailander; and the Village Council.  During this and the next three budget meetings, Department Directors will present their needs and their “wish lists” for both their Operating and Capital Budgets.  Suggestions for changes or revisions by the Village Council will be incorporated into the budgets at the final meeting.  Mr. Rooney will review revenues, head counts, and overall capital project impact to glean sufficient information to arrive at a projected tax rate.

 

4.         DISCUSSION ITEMS

 

            A.        REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL BUDGETS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS

 

                        1.         PARKS DEPARTMENT

                        2.         RECREATION DEPARTMENT

                        3.         GRAYDON POOL

4.         PROJECT PRIDE

5.         COMMUNITY CENTER   

 

Presenting the budget will be Nancy Bigos, Director of the Parks and Recreation Department; Katie Frey, Superintendent of Recreation; and Matt Andruela, Supervisor of Parks and Shade Tree Department. 

 

Ms. Bigos began by stating that investing in the Village infrastructure is truly a matter of good governance.  She thanked all the individuals with whom she collaborated to arrive at the proposed budget, including the Water, Signal, and Engineering Departments. Ms. Bigos stated that great strides have been made towards strengthening the Village’s infrastructure, especially the recreational parks and facilities.  Accomplishments include the installed lighting at Maple Park East (collaboration between Bergen County Open Space Committee, the Village, and the Ridgewood sports groups); improvements to the electrical and pump systems at the pump house at Veterans Field; the new automatic system for the distribution of sodium hydrochloride at Graydon Pool; and historic preservation renovations at the Graydon Pool restrooms and the Schedler house.  They are still working on Phase 3 of the restoration of Kings Pond Park. 

 

Ms. Bigos stated that shade tree inventory is another investment.  Every tree within the Village treescape is now inventoried as to size, species, depth/girth, health condition, when planted, and last time maintained, along with any relevant comments.  She stated that preserving the “street tree canopy” is another investment in the municipal infrastructure for future generations.  She highlighted the partnership between the Parks and Recreation Department and the Ridgewood community.  Hundreds of volunteers have invested their time and talents to the Shade Tree Commission, the Parks and Recreation Conservation Board, the Open Space Committee, the Fields Committee, the Kasschau Shell Committee, Women Gardeners of Ridgewood, and the Conservancy for Ridgewood Public Lands.

 

Ms. Bigos indicated that her department has always strived “to do more with less” and they have tried to make this year’s budget “flat.”  Seasonal salaries at Graydon have increased and been affected by recent minimum wage guidelines.  Seasonal programming was greatly curtailed during 2021 due to the Covid pandemic (bus transportation for summer day camp, Graydon programs), with decreased revenue as well.  Therefore, there are increases for the “post-Covid return to normal” in the 2022 budget when they will again open up summer programs, offer bus transportation, etc.

 

Ms. Bigos pointed out that another area of focus is bus drivers.  The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) is now requiring CDL drivers to attend training through a certified training facility.  This training has usually been done “in-house” in the past, but this is no longer acceptable to the NJDOT.  Therefore, there is a request for $15,000.00 for the required CDL training and certifications.

 

Ms. Bigos announced that Graydon Pool will open for the season on Saturday, June 4, 2022 and will close on Labor Day, September 5, 2022.  She spoke about the pool closing earlier last year due to lack of staffing.  She mentioned that every five years, children go back to school prior to Labor Day, and this is what occurred in 2021.  When this occurs, all of the educators that are employed at the administrative management level must also return to school to resume their duties.  Students participating in marching band or sports are required to start practice on August 15th, and the majority of college students have returned to their schools to begin their fall semester.  This creates a problem as to who will manage Graydon Pool for the last few weeks of the summer to ensure safety.

 

To head off similar problems in the future, Ms. Bigos mentioned that she and Katie Frey have met with Ernie Lamour of the Ridgewood YMCA and his Aquatics Director.  The YMCA offers a waterfront safety lifeguarding course and is subcontracted by the Bergen County Parks Commission to supply waterfront lifeguards for Darlington Park.  Ms. Frey has put together a Job Fair for Ridgewood teens, to be held on March 22, 2022, at the Community Center from 6:30 P.M. to 8:30 P.M.  Working with the DECA (Distributive Education Clubs of America) group from Ridgewood High School and the AM Rotary Club, Ridgewood residents will be offered the opportunity to meet with various Department Directors who are seeking summer help to learn what positions are available, what the requirements are, how to complete a job application, how to prepare a resume, and how to conduct themselves in a businesslike manner during an interview.  Hopefully this will alleviate the problem of finding qualified help/seasonal employees at Graydon Pool during the last few weeks of summer.

 

The Capital Budget for the Parks Department contains a request to replace the awning shade system at Graydon, which was originally installed in 2001.  When the aging trees at Graydon Pool are removed, patrons will need more shaded areas to block out the sun.  Another request is for the purchase of wind screens at three municipal tennis courts – some were donated by the Upper Ridgewood Tennis Club about seven years ago and they now need to be replaced. 

 

Regarding the restoration of the exterior siding and roof at The Stable, Ms. Bigos explained that the roof is composed of raw cedar shake which needs to be power washed, stained and sealed every ten years.  She said that funding needs to be aside at this time for that purpose.

 

Ms. Bigos remarked that Covid has presented various challenges for the Parks Department and they are seeking to “get back to normal” this year.  Increased costs for salaries, materials and supplies have been requested in anticipation that 2022 will see more Ridgewood residents engaging in more recreational and leisure time activities.

 

Regarding the Job Fair, Ms. Mailander mentioned that it is not only open to Ridgewood residents, but will also be posted at various local colleges and high schools to ensure adequate attendance at the fair.  Preference for employment will be given to young adults from Ridgewood. 

 

Ms. Mailander said that the biggest increase in the Parks Department budget is for CDL testing and training.  She asked if there were any questions.  Mayor Knudsen asked Ms. Bigos how many CDLs are required during a year and how many license renewals there are.  Ms. Bigos replied that she, Mr. Rutishauser, Village Engineer, and Mr. Calbi, Director of Ridgewood Water, have collaborated on a shared task force.  The Village requires any employee operating trucks or heavy machinery, such as during leaf collection or snow plowing, to possess a CDL license.  Ms. Bigos estimated that approximately three-quarters of Ridgewood’s staff now possess CDL licenses.  However, four new hires will require training for the CDL license in order to become commercial Class “B” drivers. 

 

Mayor Knudsen asked how much it costs for this training per individual.  Ms. Bigos replied that it costs approximately $3,000.00 for an individual to attend training and obtain the CDL license.  The new NJDOT regulation became effective on February 7, 2022.  Mayor Knudsen remarked that some employees hired in Ridgewood already possess a CDL license, and Ms. Bigos agreed.  Mayor Knudsen expressed concern, however, that an employee may receive the expensive CDL training from Ridgewood and then quit.  She wondered how this could be prevented.  Ms. Mailander explained that if an employee receives such training at Ridgewood’s expense and then leaves within two years, they must reimburse the Village for the cost of that training.

 

Mayor Knudsen explained to the public that at the end of the summer in 2021, there wasn’t enough staff to safely keep Graydon Pool open, although a tremendous outreach was done to try to find qualified staff.  Therefore, she was very happy to hear of the Job Fair and that the Parks Department was collaborating with the YMCA to try to avoid this problem in the future.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds remarked about the item in the budget dealing with 24 massive trees that are going to be removed because “they are reaching the end of their lifespan.”  She inquired as to whether or not these trees are healthy or if there is a fear that they will fall down.  Mr. Andruela replied that a lot of these oak trees are reaching maturity.  It is their policy not to take down healthy trees, but they are discovering that many of these older trees, while they may look healthy on the outside, have cavities in them and are in decline.  These trees are located at Hillcrest Avenue, Upper Boulevard, Morningside Avenue, California Avenue, Graydon Pool, Gypsy Pond, and Grove Park (ones adjacent to rear properties).  He said that these trees have reached maturity and it is time to take them down.  Councilwoman Reynolds asked if they have gotten three or more estimates for this tree removal work.  Mr. Andruela replied that the costs in the budget are just estimates.  Councilwoman Reynolds remarked that the requested funding translates to about $13,000.00 per tree.  She stated that it was her hope that a company would offer a more suitable cost per tree since the contract would involve the removal of 24 trees.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked about the 90 trees which are slated for removal this year due to invasion by the emerald ash borer.  She asked whether the $229,000.00 requested for this project included removal of the 90 trees as well as the planting of 180 new trees.  Ms. Bigos replied in the affirmative.  Councilwoman Reynolds asked for a breakdown of the costs for each phase of the project.  Ms. Bigos estimates that the removal of the 90 trees would cost approximately $1,000.00 per tree ($90,000.00) and the replacement of 180 ash trees which were removed in 2021 and 2022 would cost $600.00 per tree.

 

Councilman Sedon stated that he fully supported the tree initiatives in the Capital Budget.  He stated that, unfortunately, the tree planting budget last year turned into a “tree cutting budget.”  He said that many residents expressed interest in tree plantings at Zoning Board meetings while discussing the Master Plan and mentioned that the budget for tree planting for the Shade Tree Commission has historically been underfunded, but that fortunately that is no longer the case.  He mentioned that “hollowed out” trees can be very dangerous to life and property, although they look perfectly healthy on the outside.  Councilman Sedon remarked that “this should be a year of trees.”  He urged the Village Council to support the Shade Tree Commission budget in order to restore the tree canopy in the CBD and to maintain the trees already planted.

 

Councilwoman Perron mentioned that she was very glad to see many tree-related initiatives in this budget proposal.  She asked if more pruning could be done, for example, in front of the library.  She also asked if the water wagon trailer is only to be used in the CBD or whether it could be used elsewhere in the Village.  Councilman Sedon replied that it can be used anywhere, especially with the newly planted trees.

 

Mayor Knudsen asked Ms. Bigos about the “sinking fund” for the turf fields.  She asked whether or not the Village was supposed to have received monies from the various sports groups in the Village to replenish the sinking fund.  Ms. Bigos replied that funds were not requested from the youth sports groups.  Mayor Knudsen asked if the sports groups contributed to the Maple turf field.  Ms. Bigos replied that the first turf field was completely funded by the youth sports groups, understanding that the “second time around” it would be funded by the Village.  The “sinking fund” is going to be applied for the “third go around.”  Ms. Bigos replied that the turf field has a lifespan of approximately 8 to 10 years.  Councilman Vagianos asked Ms. Bigos what the turf field costs each time it’s replaced.  Ms. Bigos said that the cost would vary, depending upon the turf product that is chosen, but stated that it costs between $500,000.00 and $600,000.00.  Mayor Knudsen recalled that the last time it was replaced, it cost approximately $685,000.00.

 

Councilman Vagianos stated that the increase in temporary seasonal staffing is because there wasn’t much staffing in 2021 due to Covid.  Ms. Bigos agreed with Councilman Vagianos.  She stated that they desire to return to normalcy in 2022 and reinstate many of the programs that were not offered during the pandemic.  The summer day camp is usually attended by 450 to 500 children and requires 80 employees (directors, counselors, assistant counselors, and bus counselors).

 

Ms. Mailander asked if there were any questions regarding the budgets for Graydon Pool, Project Pride, and the Community Center.  Councilwoman Reynolds asked about the items in the Project Pride budget for $5,000.00 for seasonal planting and watering trees, $16,000.00 for materials and supplies, and $8,000.00 for maintenance help (watering and weeding).  She was confused since these requests seemed to overlap each other or were duplicitous.  Ms. Mailander explained that the $16,000.00 was for the plantings and the $5,000.00 is for the people who do the watering in the CBD specifically.  Councilwoman Reynolds said she was still confused as to what these items represent.  The Operating Budget for 2022 lists $8,000.00 for horticulture supplies and $8,000.00 for maintenance help, watering and weeding of tree wells and containers.  Mr. Rooney said that there was no duplication and that the wording was probably confusing in the itemized list.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked whether the Recreation Opportunities for Individuals with Disabilities (ROID) Grant was a matching grant (1:1).  Ms. Bigos said that it was not.  Mr. Rooney said that there were two $20,000 pieces, which were budgeted separately (state and federal programs).  There is another $20,000 applicable in 2022, which is categorized separately in the budget.

 

                        6.         ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

                        7.         PLANNING BOARD

 

Christopher Rutishauser explained that he oversees both the Zoning Board of Adjustment and the Planning Board.  Jane Wondergem has been the secretary for both boards.  The Village is currently undergoing development of the Master Plan, and there was a lengthy presentation last night from the consultant for the Master Plan.  Several more meetings are planned, after which time several proposed Ordinances will be developed for consideration by the Village Council.  Mr. Rutishauser indicated that the Zoning Board of Adjustment has several upcoming challenges, mostly due to “quirks” in the land use laws.  An illuminated billboard matter will be coming before the board shortly, which will be a challenge because the Village does not currently have any illuminated billboards.  The Village Planner, Maryann Bucci-Carter from CME Associates, will join Mr. Rutishauser at those hearings when they are scheduled.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked about the proposed budget increase for “Other Professional Services” and inquired whether Mr. Rutishauser was expecting some “big ticket items” in 2022.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that this item represents attorneys’ fees for both the Zoning Board of Adjustment and Planning Board.  The attorney for the Planning Board charges a bit more than the attorney for the Zoning Board of Adjustment.  There are also attorneys’ fees whenever litigation occurs.

 

                        8.         ENGINEERING

 

Mr. Rutishauser explained the Operating and Capital Budgets for the Engineering Department.  He stated that a great majority of the projects are designed in-house.  The Engineering Department is currently advertising for a Principal Engineer to replace the prior Principal Engineer who left in January 2022.  Interviews should commence within approximately two weeks.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked about the item for the replacement of Kings Lane Bridge for $500,000.00.  Mr. Rutishauser explained that the bridge was condemned in mid-summer of 2021 before Hurricane Ida did more damage to it.  The bridge suffered severe corrosion and it was not safe for foot traffic.  It is now closed.  He has spoken to a couple of companies to rebuild the bridge but so far no one has expressed interest in this project.  However, last year the State of New Jersey adopted new regulations (Chapter 71) allowing municipalities to bid out such projects as a “design/build” process rather than the traditional “design, bid, build” process. 

 

Mr. Rutishauser indicated that he has reached out to the Village Attorney to get insight as to whether or not it would be appropriate for the Village to pursue this avenue.  He stated that the $500,000.00 figure is just an estimate.  He mentioned that steel prices are “going through the roof” and he hopes that this figure does not increase.  Ms. Mailander added that that bridge requires Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) permits.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that this project requires an extensive permitting process for the footings at the edge of the water and for ADA accessibility with the use of ramps.  He added that this will be a challenge on the East Saddle River Road side since it is a Bergen County road.  He has reached out to the county and they have already given him some preliminary comments regarding the reconstruction of the bridge.


Councilwoman Reynolds inquired whether or not it would be possible to get some financial assistance from Bergen County regarding the reconstruction of the bridge or possibly a grant.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that this was not possible at this time.  He replied that this is a footbridge that serves a very small community of Ridgewood residents.  Councilwoman Reynolds asked if it would be prudent to wait a year before commencing this project in the hope that steel prices will decrease.  Mr. Rutishauser said that he hopes steel prices decrease, but he doesn’t foresee this bridge being built in 2022 due to the required process (approval for funds, permitting process, seeking bids, etc.) which can take a very long time.

 

Councilman Vagianos asked Mr. Rutishauser how much use this bridge gets.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that it gets a lot of use from local residents because it is convenient for those residents living on the east side of the Saddle River to access Route 17, the Park and Ride, the future Schedler Park, etc., by foot.  Councilman Vagianos asked if there were any alternatives for those pedestrians.  Mr. Rutishauser said that residents could walk along Route 17 (not advisable) or go north on East Saddle River Road, make a left at the “funky squiggly” intersection and go over the Bogert’s Mill Crossing bridge over the Saddle River.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked if the bridge could be looked at again to determine whether or not it could be rehabilitated.  The topic of this bridge arose at an Historic Preservation Commission meeting (aesthetics, appearance along the river, importance of the footbridge).  Mr. Rutishauser replied that the style of the bridge is noncompliant with ADA regulations.  Even if the bridge were repaired/renovated, he explained that the extent of renovations needed would require ADA compliance even though it isn’t being entirely replaced. 

 

Councilwoman Perron asked if a structural analysis would be feasible to determine if the bridge can be repaired and brought up to code.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that he has discussed “re-decking” the bridge with engineers; however, the bulk of the corrosion is on the supporting members of the deck, which makes re-decking impossible.  The current composition of the bridge is a weathering steel, a type of steel which develops a patina of rust when exposed to the elements and which is not able to be painted.  In addition, the bridge is “low” in relationship to the flood elevations of the Saddle River, seen especially after Hurricane Ida. 

 

Mr. Rutishauser said that if requested by the Village Council, he could solicit an opinion of the condition of the footbridge from a structural engineer. Councilwoman Perron asked if it has been looked at by a structural engineer, and Mr. Rutishauser replied that he has the same license as a structural engineer.  He feels that another structural engineer would probably arrive at the same conclusions that he has, that it is not feasible to re-deck the bridge.  Mayor Knudsen stated that it would benefit the Village to have an expert look at the bridge since $500,000.00 is a lot of money to reconstruct this bridge.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that he can put out a Request for Proposal (RFP) within the next few weeks.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds also indicated that she would be interested to know if the bridge can be salvaged.  She asked Mr. Rutishauser how much he thought it would cost to get a “second opinion.”  He replied that it would cost approximately $8,000.00 to $10,000.00.  Mayor Knudsen indicated that she felt it would be valuable to get another opinion.  Councilwoman Perron said she would also be in favor of getting another opinion to see if it would “pass muster” with the DEP. 

 

Councilman Vagianos asked Mr. Rutishauser whether the bridge needed more than just the decking repaired, and Mr. Rutishauser replied that, based upon his observations, the decking is ”rotted away” or corroded, although he was unsure how deep the corrosion went into the supporting members, which would require some testing.  He would add to the RFP that “nondestructive” testing be performed (so that a major portion of the bridge is not cut away just to “peek inside”).  Councilman Vagianos asked Mr. Rutishauser if he felt there was a “reasonable possibility” that a structural engineer could devise a plan to save this bridge, and Mr. Rutishauser replied that there is such a possibility.

 

                        9.         TRAFFIC AND SIGNAL

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that Richard Tarleton, Supervisor of the Traffic and Signal Department, has been with the Village of Ridgewood for many years.  Mr. Rutishauser added that Mr. Tarlton has done a great job so far and was commended for directing the installation of the pedestrian-activated crosswalk signals on Hillcrest and West Glen Avenues.  Mr. Rutishauser indicated that there is currently an opening to fill the vacancy due to Jim O’Connell’s retirement.  This department has several repair projects ongoing.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked about the increase in the request for electrical supplies.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that the cost of electrical supplies has been severely affected by the Covid pandemic (staffing shortages, supply chain issues).  In addition, a lot of building has been occurring and the Village must compete with builders for the same supplies needed by licensed electricians.  He indicated that the Traffic and Signal Department is fortunate enough to have a licensed electrician on staff to ensure that all work performed is in compliance with the National Electrical Code. 

 

Councilwoman Perron asked why the requested funds for “Conferences and Meetings” increased substantially (over 800% from $793.00 in 2021 to $45,000.00 in 2022).  Mr. Rutishauser explained that due to the pandemic, no staff members could attend training or relicensing programs in 2021; therefore, the department is in a “catch-up” phase in 2022 in order to train and relicense staff.  Mr. Tarleton remarked that the department is behind on recertifications and Continuing Education (CE) requirements, which must be maintained up to date in order to complete some of the services performed by the Traffic and Signal Department.

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked about replacement of “Truck 71.”  She read that the 2010 vehicle (utility truck with a plow) presently has 33,000 miles and that diesel engines have been very problematic; the vehicle is in fair shape and the department is asking for a replacement before the maintenance costs rise.  Mr. Rutishauser indicated that this truck is used for snow plowing and moving “stuff,” and, during the height of the pandemic, the truck was used to comply with social distancing protocols.  Councilwoman Reynolds asked how much was spent in repairs on this truck in 2021.  Mr. Rutishauser said that he would obtain this information from Fleet Services and report back to the Village Council. 

 

Councilman Vagianos indicated that he read in the explanation that this truck has a “gas” engine and diesel engines have been problematic; however, he pointed out that a new truck will also have a gas engine.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that they used to have a Fleet Manager who was very “bullish” on diesel engines.  Compared to gas engines, diesel engines have a $6,000.00 to $8,000.00 “upcharge.”  The diesel engines have been problematic in terms of maintenance.  Mr. Tarleton pointed out that the use of the word “gas” was a typo.

 

Mayor Knudsen asked about the litter cans in the CBD.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that he is working closely with the Police Department, which originally suggested that see-through litter cans with clear liners be used in the CBD to enhance security.  A number of “pressure cooker bombs” have exploded in litter cans, in Asbury Park in particular, and the Police Department would like the Village to remove the cast concrete litter bins presently in place due to the serious injuries from flying debris that could occur if such a bomb were placed in one of these concrete bins.  Mayor Knudsen said that while she appreciated the purpose of the see-through litter cans, she feels they are a “deterrent” and “unappealing” for visitors to the CBD. 

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that a member of the Police Department will explain why these cans are being requested when it is their turn to present their proposed budget.  Mr. Rutishauser added that, unfortunately, the see-through containers do not have a long service life since they break easily.  Mayor Knudsen mentioned that at the most recent Planning Board meeting, there was a suggestion to increase the number of recycling containers in the CBD.

 

                        10.       BUILDING MAINTENANCE

 

Mr. Rutishauser explained that Building Maintenance consists of custodial services and upkeep of the facilities and buildings in Ridgewood (bus station, Kasschau Shell, Habernickel property, Central Garage, Village Hall, Community Center, etc.).  Mr. Rutishauser mentioned the “touchless” towel dispensers, faucets, and soap dispensers presently installed in the restrooms at Village Hall in keeping with Covid protocols.  These were all installed by the Traffic and Signal Department, Building Maintenance Division. 

 

Councilwoman Perron asked what kinds of maintenance services would be performed at the bus terminal.  Mr. Rutishauser stated that there was a vagrancy problem in that area and the shelter there has been locked.  He stated that if the Village Council wished to reopen the bus terminal building, he would like to first talk with the Police Department to determine how this may be accomplished without having the vagrancy problems recur again.  The building is not heated and is only good for “three season use.”  If year-round use is desired, heat could be installed at minimal cost since it is a relatively small building.  Mr. Rutishauser said that the building needs some “tender loving care” since there are rotted timber members and decayed bricks around the façade.

 

Mayor Knudsen remarked that the bus station building was built in the late 1950s or early 1960s by John Gilchrist, Sr., and was recognized for architectural excellence by the State of New Jersey at that time.  The Historic Preservation Commission (HTC) determined that it had value as an historic site, particularly because of its proximity and alignment with Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church and the War Memorial in Memorial Park at Van Neste Square.  It is listed as an historic element in their inventory.  It is believed that it would qualify for a Certificate of Eligibility from the State of New Jersey, and perhaps it could be repurposed as a flower shop/coffee shop/bus station.  It is recognized that the building does need some repairs but does have “viability” for future use. 

 

John Gilchrist, Jr., the original architect’s son, sent some plans/drawings to Mayor Knudsen, which she will forward to the Councilmembers.  Mayor Knudsen remarked that she could place this item on the agenda for discussion with the HTC; if the building received a Certificate of Eligibility from the State of New Jersey, there would then be an opportunity to possibly obtain grant funding to perform repair work to the building.  The HTC also recommended removing the lengthy benches at the train station building and installing chairs with “bumps” between them so vagrants could not use them to sleep on.  Surveillance cameras could also be installed to add security to the area and building.

 

                        11.       WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY

 

Mr. Rutishauser indicated that the only item in the Capital Budget for the Water Pollution Control Facility is a request for funding to upgrade the Supervised Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system for operating the plant.  That effort is being coordinated with the same vendor used by the Water Utility.  One advantage of this collaboration is that the Water Utility has two staff members who are extremely knowledgeable and who have lent their expertise in helping the Water Pollution Control Facility operate their SCADA system.  

 

Councilman Sedon asked how often the sludge is trucked away.  Mr. Rutishauser said that there are usually five to seven loads per week; however, this varies depending upon holidays.  Also, there was damage caused to bar screens from Hurricane Ida, which caused an increase in sludge volume.  The tankard holds 5,000 gallons and it is trucked to the Passaic Valley Sewage Commission in Newark.

 

Mayor Knudsen asked when the latest upgrade was for the SCADA system.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that they have been working on it for the last four or five years.  As funding is received, certain components of the system are upgraded.  Employees of the Traffic and Signal Department perform the fiberoptic connection work.  Cameras are now installed at all pump stations, enabling the plant operator to view on a screen any problems which may arise at the pump stations.

 

                        12.       FLEET SERVICES

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that Mike Junta is Supervisor of Fleet Services and Streets, and is involved with Yard Waste Recycling as well.  Mr. Rutishauser explained that Fleet Services is experiencing the same problems as the Traffic and Signal Department in terms of increased costs for replacement parts, lubricants and oil.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked about the items listed as “Bob’s adjustment” for $30,000.00 and another “Bob’s adjustment” of $10,000.00, both for overtime.  Mr. Rooney explained that these adjustments are usually in the right-hand column for the prior year’s budget – these items represent adjustments to the budget from last year in order to maintain the tax rate.

 

                        13.       YARD WASTE RECYCLING

 

Mr. Rutishauser indicated that this budget is greatly affected by the weather.  For example, there was a lot of rain in 2021 which resulted in a greater than normal growth of grass and foliage; therefore, there was more yard waste that needed to be disposed of.  In addition, storms create more vegetative debris, which also increases the volume of yard waste that must be removed.

 

A comment was made that disposal fees went up a lot.  Mr. Rutishauser reiterated that there was a lot of yard waste because there was a lot of rain last year.  The Village is allowed to compost leaves at the Lakeview Compost Facility, but not allowed to compost grass clippings there.  The grass clippings must be disposed of usually within a day of being picked up.  Brush, branches, etc., can be ground through the tub grinder and added to the compost; however, this degrades the quality of the compost and lowers the price that the Village can get for the compost because it contains too much “woody fiber.” 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked if the Village should “get the word out” about the grass clippings.  Mr. Rutishauser replied that this has been mulled over, over the years, and while it would benefit those who employ landscapers, it would be detrimental to residents who mow their own lawns.  He added that grass clippings are a very “stinky component” of yard waste.  Grass clippings cannot be stored at Lakeview but must be trucked out almost immediately.  A discussion ensued about “cut it and leave it” pros and cons (i.e., too much nutrients going back into the ground if this is done every single time a lawn is mowed; unattractiveness of dead grass on healthy grass; production of mold if cut grass is left on the lawn over the winter season).  There was also discussion about having a “cut it and leave it” month during the summer where grass clippings would not be picked up.

 

                        14.       STREETS

 

Ms. Mailander mentioned that in this Capital Budget, there is a request for funding to purchase a new leaf vacuum.  She stated that one was purchased last year and that it has been “amazing.”  It changed the way that leaves were picked up.  It was quicker, more efficient, and was worth the purchase price.  They would like to purchase another one to assist the staff with leaf collection.

 

Mike Junta remarked that his crew received more compliments than complaints this year about the way leaves were picked up.  He mentioned that there was no downtime with the new leaf vacuum as opposed to the old vehicle which was constantly breaking down.  He said that things could really be in “tip top shape” if there was another one which could be used on the other side of the Village.  Councilman Vagianos pointed out that the new leaf vacuum truck requires only one operator as opposed to three with the front-end loader and dump truck.  Therefore, there is a real cost savings associated with the purchase of this second leaf vacuum truck. 

 

Mr. Rutishauser spoke about the safety factors involved with the use of the new leaf vac, which requires only one driver who is well-protected in the cab of the truck and is not exposed to any traffic.  In addition, it is a “right-side drive,” meaning that the driver sits on the right side of the truck along the curbline.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked if Area B outsourcing could be terminated if a second leaf vac was purchased.  Mr. Rutishauser said that he has discussed this with Mr. Junta and that it is a possibility; however, it may entail some staff overtime.  He said that the cost of outsourcing Area B has increased significantly.  It was $64,000 in approximately 2016 when initially contracted with Downes Tree Service, and it has increased steadily over the years to the point where it was close to $100,000 in 2021. 

 

Mr. Rutishauser indicated that more and more snow plowing responsibilities are being performed in-house; this past winter, the outside vendor only had to be called once for assistance.  Many vehicles purchased for the Village fleet are “plow capable” and are employed when necessary.  They have also come to an agreement with Ridgewood Water to use their trucks, plows and staff for snow removal when necessary, for which they are compensated. 

 

Mayor Knudsen thanked the Village Staff for the tremendous job they have been doing with leaf collection and snow removal, stating that this year was the first year she didn’t receive any complaints.  Mr. Rutishauser added that he is in constant contact with Mr. Junta regarding the weather forecasts and that they consult with several different sources to try to accurately predict the forecast for snow or inclement weather. Salting of the roads sometimes begins even before they are contacted by Central Dispatch.  When asked by Councilwoman Reynolds whether more chemicals were being used or whether the prices of chemicals simply increased, Mr. Rutishauser replied that prices have increased.

 

                        15.       UTILITIES AND GASOLINE

 

Mr. Rutishauser said that this budget concerns gasoline, diesel fuel, and building utilities.  Ms. Mailander added that it also includes street lighting, bulk water, telephone, and bulk purchases.  Mr. Rutishauser explained that costs for hydrocarbon, gasoline, and diesel fuel are increasing.  Staff is constantly reminded not to idle vehicles unnecessarily.

 

A small break was taken and then the meeting resumed.  At roll call the following were present:  Councilmembers Perron, Reynolds, Sedon, Vagianos; and Mayor Knudsen.  Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Eileen Young, Deputy Village Clerk; Robert G. Rooney, Chief Financial Officer/Parking Utility Director; Steve Sanzari, Treasurer; and Olivia DiMitri.

 

                        16.       M.I.S.

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that Dylan Hansen, Director of IT, would present the budget for his department.  Mr. Hansen indicated that two new employees were hired at the end of 2021.  He is in the process of training them, including the video streaming of Village Council meetings.  In addition, a lot of the IT systems have been upgraded and new computers deployed throughout the Village.  His department has been working with the Water Department on the Esri Project.  Geographic Information Systems (GIS) will be introduced this coming year and used on some of the Village’s mapping systems. 

 

Mr. Hansen indicated that WIFI will be extended and his department will be working on that this summer with the Signal Department, with the goal of having at least two parks WIFI compatible by the end of summer.  The two parks will be the turf field by Graydon Pool and Memorial Park at Van Neste Square.  Other projects include posting ordinances and resolutions on the Village website; this will, hopefully, be completed within the next two weeks.  A prototype has been sent to Ms. Mailander and has met with her approval.  He will send an email to all Councilmembers once this has been completed.

 

Future projects include integrating more things into the Village website and trying to make the website more navigable so that residents can find information easier.  Other projects include upgrading the Public Access Channel equipment and moving their servers to a newer platform. The biggest project will be upgrading the phone system.

 

Councilwoman Perron asked if the revamping of the Village website would make the pages load faster.  He said that he hasn’t encountered any slow speeds and that he would take a look at her equipment to see if there are any connectivity issues.  He added that they are planning to upgrade a lot of the modules in their servers to a newer platform, funds for which are included in this year’s budget request.

 

Regarding the Operating Budget, there are some increases in contractual services for some of the IT Department vendors, even though the services these vendors provide have not changed.  Mr. Hansen indicated that the cost for the Simple DirectMedia Layer (SDL) utilized by the Health Department and Building Department is increasing.  Laserfiche prices are also increasing; this is used to scan all ordinances and documents.  The amount of licensed users needs to be increased from 10 users to 25 users since the Finance Department is now utilizing the laserfiche process.  Licensing fees for the email archiver, which is heavily used every day especially for OPRA requests, and the email filter, which protects the IT system against hacking, have also increased since 2021. 

 

Mr. Hansen indicated that the amount of $35,000.00 has been requested in the budget for revamping of the Village website, which includes the laserfiche licensing, modules and updates.  Costs for materials and supplies, books and publications, and office supplies have remained steady.  Funds set aside for training in 2021 were not utilized since there weren’t many in-person training courses available.  The only training courses were online (due to the pandemic) and Mr. Hansen said that these online courses are not as effective as the in-person training programs. The cost for conferences and meetings went up slightly – he would like to bring some of his employees this year to various meetings, such as a CIO Meeting, so that they can learn about governmental functions since they are from the private sector.

 

Regarding the Capital Budget, Mr. Hansen indicated that his department is striving to do the replacements for desktop computers.  A request for $50,000.00 has been made, which will allow the Village to obtain approximately 22 to 23 computers, including the user licensing for Office, the operating system, and the equipment.  They try to replace computers after five to seven years.  He will commence instructing employees on the new Windows 11 operating system.

 

Councilman Vagianos asked about the costs for the Toughbooks for the Police Department, and Mr. Hansen confirmed that they cost $4,500.00 each, or six for $26,000.00.  He verified that the lifespan for these Toughbooks is about five years.  These computers can operate in extreme heat or cold with no problems.  In the past, hard-wired Explorer units were utilized in police cars and they would turn off every time the cars were turned off.  Therefore, the computer would have to be rebooted and the police officer would have to sign in again once he returned to the police car.  The Toughbook stays on without the car running because they are laptops.  They are useful to police because they can be brought into a house or business, if need be, and reports could be generated at the scene.  They have built-in Verizon cards and are preferred over other types of laptops that have been sampled.  In addition, two “spares” will be purchased so that they can be rotated and there will be a spare in case one breaks down.

 

Mr. Hansen mentioned his department is trying to replace their servers as funding becomes available.  They are reorganizing the server room to find more space utilization since the amount of data stored on the servers has grown immensely over the years.

 

                        17.       HEALTH DEPARTMENT

 

This presentation will be held tomorrow night, February 17, 2022.

 

                        18.       TAX ASSESSOR

 

Ms. Mailander said that William Palumbo, the Village Tax Assessor, would present the budget for his department.  Mr. Palumbo was recently sworn in as Tax Assessor.  He spoke about the tax increase in 2021 and also about performing assessments.  He will personally perform assessments and inspect homes.  He spoke about tax ratios and coefficients.  There are 24 towns undergoing reassessments this year and six towns going through re-evaluation.  He spoke about rising housing costs due to the pandemic. 

 

Mayor Knudsen asked Mr. Palumbo how the current inflated prices for homes would affect the tax ratio in the future.  Mr. Palumbo explained that as prices increase, the tax ratio decreases but the tax rates go up.  This keeps things in balance.  He also spoke about money set aside in the budget for tax appeals ($75,000).  He said he wasn’t sure whether there would be any appeals, but that there may be some appeals by commercial establishments.  The last reassessment in Ridgewood was performed in 2012.  Reassessments are performed at the discretion of the County.  There has been an increase in the “Education” portion of his budget so that his clerk can obtain her CTA and then be certified to perform inspections in the field.

 

                        19.       MUNICIPAL COURT

 

Ms. Mailander introduced the Village Municipal Court Administrator, Kim McWilliams.  Ms. McWilliams explained that during 2021, the Municipal Court continued the implementation of criminal justice reform, particularly cases affected by the legalization of marijuana.  Four marijuana cases were dismissed and the fines owed by the defendants were vacated.  The court is in the process of expunging these cases from the system, including fingerprinting.  This project will take a few more months to complete.  Due to the pandemic, the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) implemented a lot of online processes (record requests, expungement, ticket disputes, payment of summonses, etc.) to avoid crowds in the courtrooms.  This also produces less foot traffic at the Violations window.

 

In 2022, Ms. McWilliams indicated that they will be continuing the successful Shared Services Agreement between Ridgewood, Glen Rock and Wyckoff.  They are working to improve virtual court sessions, which are very challenging.  The State of New Jersey has directed that all municipal courts should continue Zoom court sessions indefinitely.  She stated that their departmental budget is equal to the budget is 2021, maybe increased by $100.00 or so. 

 

Ms. Mailander added that the AOC wants municipalities to have Shared Services Agreements with four or five other municipal court systems.  There is a possibility that more towns will be added to the Shared Services Agreement between Ridgewood, Glen Rock and Wyckoff.  Councilwoman Perron asked if this has been broached with either Midland Park or Ho-Ho-Kus. Ms. McWilliams replied that she believes Midland Park is entering into such an agreement with another court.  She is waiting to see if the Court Administrator in Ho-Ho-Kus may retire soon but has not pushed the issue of merging because she “wouldn’t want to go after anybody’s job.”

 

Councilman Vagianos asked about the shared services process.  Ms. McWilliams clarified that each municipality maintains their own judge, prosecutor, and public defender.  The only thing shared is “office space,” Ms. McWilliams and her staff.  Councilwoman Reynolds expressed surprise that Zoom court sessions are going to be held indefinitely.  Ms. McWilliams replied that judges and staff don’t want sessions through Zoom.  Councilwoman Reynolds remarked that no court official is going to retire if Zoom calls remain the norm.  Ms. McWilliams stated that Zoom sessions are horrible:  people smoke during sessions, go to the bathroom, etc. 

 

Mayor Knudsen mentioned that there is a certain “respect” demanded when defendants have to arrive to court in person for an offense or summons, and that this is missing during Zoom sessions.  Appearance in a courtroom for a first-time offender could be an “important moment in time” since they are in the public eye and must deal with their offense in public.  This could be a pivotal moment and change someone’s life, but this aspect is also lost in Zoom sessions. 

 

Mayor Knudsen also asked who pays the cost for the expungements.  Ms. McWilliams replied that the State of New Jersey pays for the expungements from an established fund for that purpose.  A separate division had to be formed since there were so many expungements that needed to be done. 

 

Ms. McWilliams mentioned that Ridgewood has lost approximately $758.00 per expunged/dismissed case.  Mr. Rooney mentioned that the Village’s revenue stream has decreased rapidly (by approximately 50%) in terms of court fines and costs.  Ms. McWilliams mentioned that not only did the State of New Jersey dismiss marijuana cases, but they also dismissed any minor traffic tickets issued/fines assessed before 2003 since they were too old and were affecting people negatively (e.g., suspension of license, loss of job) who didn’t have the money at that time to pay the ticket.  This did not include careless driving tickets but did include offenses such as no license plate illumination or not wearing a seatbelt.

 

Ms. McWilliams indicated that any infractions after 2004 will still be prosecuted and fines assessed.  She also indicated that her department is trying to hire a collection agency to collect unpaid fines and costs assessed for serious offenses.  The Village would not have to pay the collection agency; any collection costs assessed are due and payable by the defendant.  She is hoping that this proposal to hire an outside collection agency will be approved by Judge Grant. The Village would receive a percentage of any monies collected by the collection agency (factoring).  It was pointed out that any monies collected for unpaid fines is “better than zero.”  Ms. McWilliams explained that due to a new law passed on January 1, 2022, licenses may no longer be suspended for nonpayment of fines/costs or failure to show up in court.  However, warrants for arrest may still be issued.

 

                        20.       FIRE DEPARTMENT

 

Chief John Judge indicated that Firefighter Jason Jacoby is also present this evening and that he has a diverse background in firefighting equipment and apparatus.  Accomplishments of the Fire Department in 2021 include transitioning the ambulance/EMS functions to the Fire Department.  They respond to all calls Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. and to all advanced calls 24 hours a day, as well as anytime a second ambulance is needed throughout the Village.  This has resulted in a cost savings, as well as improved control, oversight and patient care.  They have received compliments from the paramedics in the Village about the quality of patient care given by the firefighters. 

 

Additionally, two new firefighters were hired in 2021, both of whom will be finishing their probationary period in June 2022 and both of whom have completed their training courses (Firefighter I, Firefighter II, and EMT).  A Fire Prevention Secretary was also hired (Marisol) and she has been a very solid addition to the department. 

 

Multiple capital projects were completed by the Fire Department in 2021:  the training tower was repaired and repainted, the wall used for bail-out training and rappelling was repaired in-house; the turnout gear washer and dryer were obtained and installed (it used to take almost three days to fully wash and dry a set of gear, but now six sets can be washed in 2-1/2 hours), thus improving preparedness of the team; and the 20+ year old kitchen was updated.

 

Chief Judge said he and his assistant have reviewed several accounts earmarked for the Fire Department.  These will be reviewed by Mr. Sanzari, Mr. Rooney and others and, if it is determined that the Fire Department will not use these funds, the funds will be returned to the Village for other purposes.  For 2022, some outside vendors will be utilized such as a radio vendor.  Three members of his department recently underwent training for ice rescue (Technician Level I). 

 

Chief Judge stated that another goal deals with outreach.  He has already attended a couple of meetings with Mutual Aid (an agreement among emergency responders to lend assistance across jurisdictional boundaries), and he would like to bring Mutual Aid to the Village to do some walk-throughs of the new buildings in the Village to provide “familiarization” of these buildings.  He is in the process of joining the Career Fire Chiefs Association, and he has been in touch with several Fire Chiefs in the area to improve relationships.  Regarding community outreach, they have organized some senior programs and fire prevention programs, and have been developing Covid-safe ways to educate the public via Zoom.

 

Lastly, Chief Judge indicated that he is developing a new 5- to 10-year plan for the Fire Department, including grant writing, improvement of RSO rating, additional public outreach regarding fire prevention in the community, training and development, accreditation, and various committees such as the Apparatus Committee to determine what equipment needs to be purchased in the future.

 

Regarding the Operating Budget, Chief Judge stated that there is only a 1-1/2% increase over last year or approximately $2,000.00.  The increase includes additional training expenses and Power DMS, a document management system used for policies, procedures, and certifications.  Salaries and wages are contractual.  Regarding the Capital Budget, one item is a request for replacing the 10-year-old firefighting gear.  The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) requires that that gear be replaced every 10 years.  Ten sets were replaced in 2002 (helmets, gloves, coats, pants, boots, hoods).  Chief Judge said that this will be an expense for approximately the next 4-1/2 years.

 

Another request in the Capital Budget is the purchase of a new ambulance to replace ambulance #11 (2002 vehicle with 56,000 miles).  He spoke to hospitals and other agencies in the area and determined that the consensus was that the lifespan of an ambulance was between 7 and 14 years.  The last two ambulances replaced in the Village were 10 and 15 years old, respectively.  Ambulance #11 is now 20 years old.  The wait for a new ambulance is about 16 months, so he would like to begin the process as soon as possible to replace this ambulance, at which point ambulance #11 will be about 21-1/2 years old.

 

There is also a request for $15,000.00 to replace portable radios and batteries.  This replacement would not take place right away, but Chief Judge hopes to begin a fund towards that goal.  Each radio with a microphone runs about $5,000.00, and are about $8,000.00 with triband features.  In addition, the garage doors are about 30 years old.  About $7,000.00 was spent in 2021 in repairs on the garage doors.  In 2021, two of the doors were replaced at a cost of between $2,500 and $3,000.00 each (motors, pulleys, cables).  Ideally, Chief Judge would like to replace all of the doors in 2022; however, he is not sure what they cost now since prices for everything have been steadily increasing.  Replacing the doors is crucial since sometimes the doors “stick” as they are trying to pull out the fire engines.  He would also like to replace the 10-year-old bail-out devices, which have a 10-year lifespan per manufacturer standards and NFPA standards.  The original bail-out devices were obtained through a grant 10 years ago.

 

Chief Judge also mentioned that there is only one shower at the Fire Headquarters.  He would like to convert the currently unused utility closet upstairs into a second bathroom.  He stated that due to cancer concerns, firemen must now shower before leaving the building.  In addition, with Covid, the firefighters have been decontaminating more often than normal after calls. 

 

Another request is to increase their water/ice rescue equipment.  Snow/ice events have been getting worse in the Village, and Chief Judge stated that his department is ill-equipped at the present time.  They are hoping to purchase some more personal flotation devices, ice sleds, and dry suits.  The additional equipment would enable the Fire Department to be better equipped to handle such weather emergencies. 

 

Another request under “Miscellaneous” includes funds for Scott cylinders, hoses, tools, and other equipment.  The cost to replace one Scott cylinder is $1,350.00.  Hoses were purchased approximately 20+ years ago and some of the hoses are failing; he would need approximately $6,000.00 just to replace the hoses. 

 

There is also a request for a Zetron radio console to replace the approximately 30-year-old Zetron 4010 model they currently use.  It is hard to find parts for this old model, and it broke down completely about a week ago.  Thankfully, the Signal Department was able to replace a couple of the copper lines that led to the console.  Pricing for a two-station system used for dispatching (one at Headquarters and one at Engine 31) runs approximately $170,000.00.  The system alone is $130,000.00.  This can also be used by Northwest Bergen Central Dispatch at Fire Headquarters.

 

Mayor Knudsen asked if there was any difference in the interior and equipment of a 2002 ambulance when compared to a newer ambulance.  Mr. Jacoby explained that the interior would be almost the same, but the equipment/technology would be upgraded (suction units, airbags, seats, harness systems - 5-point harnesses as opposed to single beltline seatbelts).  Chief Judge added that ambulance #11 doesn’t meet current emission or safety standards.  Mr. Jacoby added that the newer vehicles are built on a liquid spring suspension rather than a freight-liner chassis, which would ensure a more comfortable ride for the patient with less bumping around.

 

Councilman Vagianos asked whether the ambulance and radio console were currently operable but clearly need updating.  Mr. Jacoby replied that both were currently operable.  However, he stated that the air-conditioning in ambulance #11 broke down last year and was out of service for over a month.  If the heat breaks down during the winter in the ambulance, there will be more downtime.  Regarding the console, the replacement could wait a year.  However, he stated that the ambulance really needs to be replaced. 

 

Councilwoman Reynolds asked if ambulance #11 would have any resale value.  Chief Judge said that it was hard to predict what the resale price would be since it will take them approximately 16 months to get a new ambulance once ordered.  He said that he would be happy to review any resale options at the appropriate time.  When questioned by Councilwoman Perron, Mr. Jacoby explained that a bail-out system deals with firefighter safety and survival.  It is a type of life safety rope that can be attached to window sills, bedframes, or walls.  If a firefighter is trapped on the second story (or higher) of a building, they can tie this rope around themselves and climb out a window to safety (rappelling system).  These bail-out systems only have a 10-year lifespan since they deteriorate over time with repeated usage.

 

            B.        WRAP-UP AND NEXT STEPS

 

Ms. Mailander indicated that the next Budget Meeting will be held on February 17, 2022 at 5:00 P.M.  There will be presentation of budgets from the Police Department, Emergency Management Department, Building Department, Library, Emergency Services, Health Department, Village Council, Village Manager, Village Attorney, Village Clerk, and Elections.

 

5.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

NONE.

 

6.         ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Reynolds, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Regular Public Meeting was adjourned at 7:47 P.M.

 

 

 

                                                ____________________________________

                                                                                                Susan Knudsen

                                                                                                       Mayor

 

 

 

____________________________________

                     Eileen Young

               Deputy Village Clerk

  • Hits: 589

COPYRIGHT © 2023 VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD

If you have any trouble with accessing information contained within this website, please contact the MIS Department - 201-670-5500 x2222 or by email mis@ridgewoodnj.net.

Feedback