Village Council Public Meeting Minutes 20151109
A REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY ON NOVEMBER 9, 2015 AT 8:00 P.M.
-
CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE – MOMENT OF SILENCE
Mayor Aronsohn called the meeting to order at 8:02 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call, the following were present: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn. Also present were Roberta Sonenfeld, Village Manager; Heather A. Mailander, Village Clerk; and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney.
Mayor Aronsohn led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
2. ACCEPTANCE OF FINANCIAL REPORTS
Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Bills, Claims, and Vouchers, and Statement of Funds on hand as of October 31, 2015, be accepted as submitted. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Councilwoman Knudsen
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Village Council minutes of June 10, June 24, and October 14, 2015 having been reviewed by the Village Council and now available in the Village Clerk’s Office be approved as submitted. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Councilwoman Knudsen
4. PROCLAMATIONS
There were no Proclamations this evening.
5. SWEARING-IN OF FIREFIGHTERS
a. Firefighter Oscar Martinez
Oscar Martinez was sworn in as a Firefighter in the Ridgewood Fire Department by Mayor Aronsohn. Firefighter Martinez’s wife held the Bible as his parents and brother looked on.
b. Firefighter Michael Rohrman
Michael Rohrman was sworn in as a Firefighter in the Ridgewood Fire Department by Mayor Aronsohn. Firefighter Rohrman’s mother held the Bible as his father looked on.
6. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Mayor Aronsohn announced that the five draft ordinances on multi-family housing would be carried to the December 9th meeting. There will be a discussion of Affordable Housing, and the next steps that the Village Council is contemplating on the multi-family housing issue. He suggested that those wishing to comment on these issues may want to wait until the respective public hearings.
Ron Simoncini, 249 Bogert Avenue, stated that as an advocate he wanted to take this opportunity to review the status of the multi-family housing project. He was disturbed when members of the public told Councilmembers they needed to watch themselves when they walked down the street, and the fact that anonymous letters had been sent out several days before an election in an attempt to influence people through the use of false information. He said that there are many reasonable people who are attempting to continue a sincere, productive dialogue, but there are others who want to manipulate the process and Village Councilmembers. Mr. Simons said that threatening elected officials is insane. He hopes the Village Council has given up on the idea that they will be able to magically embrace one thing that will make all Village residents happy.
Mr. Simoncini said that the Village Council is aware of the implications of the affordable housing issue, and the threats of no rateables on these sites. He noted that all four planners who testified came to the same conclusions. He urged the Village Council to take a stand because this is about the role of government and authority. Mr. Simoncini asked that the Village Council do the job they were elected to do.
Margene Rubin, 1021 Hillcrest Road, stated that her home faces Habernickel Park. She came forward to voice concerns about the parking situation at Habernickel Park. She was concerned about whether there would be adequate parking available if there was a party or weekend activity going on at the Health Barn as well as two or three soccer games at Habernickel Park. She questioned who would monitor the number of children attending classes at the Health Barn, and if the monitoring would take place on a daily basis. She asked that the Village Council do additional research into this business
Ed Rubin, 1021 Hillcrest Road, stated that he is concerned with the apparent lack of due diligence on the entire matter of the Health Barn. He asked if Village staff have been in contact with Abma’s Farm regarding issues such as overcrowding of classes and buses. Mr. Rubin described the parking situation this weekend. He said the parking lot was full, and he noted eleven cars that had to make a “U” turn on Hillcrest Road, which is quite a narrow street. The area beside the house, where the water is located is not fenced, which could be a liability for the Village.
Mr. Rubin recalled that at the last meeting, Mayor Aronsohn read a number of emails in favor of the Health Barn. He had been told prior to the meeting that letters or emails would not be considered, and if you wanted to comment on the Health Barn you must do so in person at a meeting. Mr. Rubin commented that there were most likely many emails received that did not support the Health Barn, but they were not read into the public record.
Lesley Linker, 112 Pershing Avenue, had a problem being heard and had someone else speak on her behalf. This unidentified individual stated that Ms. Linker has two children at Somerville School, is going through a divorce, and cannot find a handicapped accessible dwelling for rent in Ridgewood. She would like to stay in Ridgewood so that her children do not have to go through the trauma of a move to a different school district, therefore, she is here tonight to express her support of accessible, affordable housing.
Anne Walsh, 112 South Irving Street, said she is a friend of Ms. Linker’s who has been assisting her in her search for accessible housing in Ridgewood. Ms. Walsh indicated that she could attest to the fact that this type of housing is extremely limited to non-existent. She also supports the multi-family housing plan, which would increase the number of pedestrians in the Central Business District who are not looking for parking spaces. It would also give older residents the ability to remain in Ridgewood near their children and grandchildren.
Siobhan Winograd, 74 Ivy Place, said she is concerned about the meeting that took place on September 30, 2015. She has attended the Civility Meetings, and has learned that civility in Ridgewood is on the decline because people lean into each other rather than concentrating on the issues at hand. The meeting on September 30th is a perfect example of the fact that the community may have reached a breaking point. Ms. Winograd observed that the biggest issues facing the Village are over simplified, and become polarized. The use of personal attacks has become commonplace, come in all forms, and appear online, on playing fields, Facebook, and on this podium. The September 30th meeting came completely undone with personal attacks on the Village Councilmembers, Matt Rogers, the developers, and ordinary citizens, who simply voiced their opinion. Accusations were made without any evidence, and life-long elderly residents were told to move to Woodcliff Lake, with several others being heckled. Ms. Winograd finds this behavior to be very disturbing, and this approach, and behavior should be condemned rather than cheered. She doesn’t want to think about the minutes from that meeting, which will be quite embarrassing.
Ms. Winograd thanked the Village Council for volunteering so much of their time, as well as Matt Rogers and Robert Sonenfeld. She said that there will be more disagreements in the future; however, the Village Council and staff should not have to do their jobs in the complete absence of decorum and decency. Ms. Winograd reminded everyone that John Saraceno, one of the developers in the multi-family housing application, is an active member of the community, who is involved in many charities, and has a life outside of work. She stated that civility, decorum, and etiquette will go a long way into making this process more effective, rather than something that everyone is ashamed of down the road.
Tess Giuliani, 174 Union Street, Apartment 2B, thanked the Village Council, and the Village Manager for the excellent information that has been provided on the Hudson Street Parking Proposal. She attended several meetings on the proposal, and felt that she had the information necessary to vote yes on the referendum for the project. The two to one vote demonstrates that people want adequate parking in Ridgewood.
Ms. Giuliani referred to the luxury downtown apartments stating that if Ridgewood residents hope to remain in the Village in the style they have become accustomed to, this is something to consider. She encouraged everyone to plan for the future, which will be here before you know it. Ms. Giuliani thanked Michael Saraceno for the accurate letter that was published in the Ridgewood News describing last month’s Village Council meeting, which she compared to a Jerry Springer show. She hopes never to see this type of behavior in Ridgewood again.
Lynne Dewhurst, 176 West Glen Avenue, said she attended the last meeting and did not attack anyone. She found the information on the parking proposal to be elaborate, concise, and informative, which was reflected in the overwhelming support for the proposal during the recent referendum. The proposals for altering the character of the Village by tripling the density doesn’t seem to be as well articulated and Ms. Dewhurst questioned why this proposal wasn’t going to be put to a vote.
Ms. Sonenfeld referred to the questions relative to the Health Barn, and stated that it would be run by the Ridgewood Parks and Recreation Department, with programs being under the control of the Village. There is a 90-day waiting period meaning that around the date of February 3, 2016, the Village Council will have an opportunity to vote on the use of the house for educational and recreational purposes, and until that time, the house cannot be used for those purposes. Ms. Sonenfeld mentioned that she is in receipt of a letter from Pamela Abma containing the following statements:
-
Health Barn was not evicted from the property.
-
Abma’s Farm is not engaged in a lawsuit with Health Barn.
-
Health Barn does not have a 20-foot sign. The sign is approximately 2 feet by 3 feet.
-
Abma’s Farm and Health Barn have a very good relationship. Both parties mutually decided that both of their programs had outgrown the spaces being shared.
Ms. Sonenfeld said they would continue dialogue with the neighbors regarding the Health Barn, and they are compiling a list of items for consideration. The Village will use the three-month period to work with the Deputy Mayor on the agreement, and there will be more to come.
Mayor Aronsohn commented on the emails that were read into the record concerning Habernickel Park. He stated that he did not recall anyone saying that letters or emails were precluded from the hearing. Regarding the housing, Mayor Aronsohn stated again that he appreciates everyone’s comments.
7. MANAGER’S REPORT
Ms. Sonenfeld stated that the Parking Steering Committee met on Friday and considered input from residents. They welcome additional input, and plan to bring a series of recommendations relative to the design, size, and financials in December. Based on input, they are looking at a design which is not as high. Ms. Sonenfeld said they should also develop a bond ordinance for the garage in December, which will be less than the $15 million that was on the referendum. She announced that a new valet parking system began on Friday night. There are two valet locations that service four businesses with valet pick-up and drop-off on Prospect Street, off of East Ridgewood Avenue; and on Chestnut Street off of East Ridgewood Avenue. The businesses involved are: It’s Greek to Me, Fish, Jen and Memoire. The goal is to remove cars from the Central Business District, and Ms. Sonenfeld reported that 33 cars were valet parked on Friday, and 50 cars were valet parked on Saturday. She concluded that the system has been a success.
Ms. Sonenfeld reported that since the e-ticket system was initiated, 1,397 tickets have been issued, mostly for parking. There were some glitches with the software in the beginning, but things seem to be running more efficiently at this time. Benefits of the program include more time for Court personnel to spend on data entry; improved accuracy, since handwriting doesn’t have to be deciphered; and ticket information that is available in real time, meaning that payment can be taken almost instantly.
Ms. Sonenfeld announced that the American Legion Post 53 will be presenting Veteran’s Day services on Wednesday, November 11th, at 11:00 A.M., at Memorial Park at Van Neste Square. Everyone is invited to attend to commemorate the memory of those who made the ultimate sacrifice for freedom.
Ms. Sonenfeld spoke about leaves, and said that residents can only put leaves out seven days before collection day. This is New Jersey law due to storm water concerns, however, leaves must be out during the first day of the pick-up range. The biggest complaint received by the Village is that people put leaves out just after the leaf collection period, and compliance is being enforced. Ms. Sonenfeld urged residents to keep the leaves on their lawns until seven days before the pick-up period, bag their leaves and keep the leaves behind the curb.
Ms. Sonenfeld said that the Village is restarting a hydrant flushing system, which will clear out the mineral deposits. This is a routine maintenance issue that helps with an aging system. This activity began several weeks ago, and they are ahead of schedule. There are no health concerns, but residents may notice that the water is slightly brown, and Ms. Sonenfeld advised against doing laundry because the clothes might stain. The work is being done from 9:00 P.M. to 4:30 A.M.
Ms. Sonenfeld referred to a recent article in the Bergen Record announcing that the Bergen County DPW complex is set to open in several weeks, with an expanded rooster of one hundred county employees. Fleet maintenance will be consolidated at one site, landscaping has been changed, as well as with some egress points.
Upcoming Events – Ms. Sonenfeld reminded everyone that Meet the Manager is scheduled for Saturday, November 14th from 9:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. The annual Interfaith Thanksgiving Day Service will take place at Old Paramus Church on November 24th, at 7:30 P.M., with a bus being available to transport senior residents wishing to attend. Village Hall will be closed on November 26th and 27th for the Thanksgiving Day holiday. November 28th begins the shopping season in the Ridgewood downtown, and features horse-drawn carts and hot chocolate. Ms. Sonenfeld stated that December 4th is Downtown for the Holidays, including entertainment, and the tree lighting. December 6th marks the first night of Hanukkah, and the Menorah will be lit at Memorial Park in Van Neste Square at 5:30 P.M. Also on December 6th, the Ridgewood Conservancy for Public Lands and Ridgewood Wildscape are teaming up to restore and clean up Twinney Pond Park.
Councilwoman Hauck asked how regularly the hydrants are flushed, and Ms. Sonenfeld said this was last done was 25 years ago. Councilwoman Hauck questioned whether the senior bus picks residents up at their homes, or do they have to get the bus at Village Hall. Ms. Sonenfeld said that the bus picks up at individual homes, and she will make sure this offering is highlighted on the Village website.
8. VILLAGE COUNCIL REPORTS
Planning Board – Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the Planning Board Meeting is this evening. The housing element of the Master Plan is being discussed, as well as the Affordable Housing Summary, which is due November 19th.
Historic Preservation Commission – Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the Historic Preservation Commission meets on Thursday, November 12th, which will feature another discussion relative to Tito’s Burritos. There was a meeting between several Commission members, Tito’s representatives, the designer and their attorney last Friday to try and resolve the issue regarding the color of the facade. She hopes that this issue can be brought to a conclusion at Thursday’s meeting.
Veteran’s Day - Councilman Pucciarelli said he would be attending the Veteran’s Day celebration at Ridgewood High School on Friday, November 13th.
On another topic, Councilman Pucciarelli referred to an earlier comment, which indicated that when the Village Council votes on the multi-family housing ordinance, they will be voting on the character of Ridgewood. During the forty years he has lived in Ridgewood, he never thought that the character was a function of building height, setback, or bricks and mortar. Ridgewood is a Village, where people live in close proximity, which is done well, and this is the character of Ridgewood.
Affordable Housing - Councilwoman Hauck said she thought it was very important for people to attend Planning Board meetings, especially when the housing plan and Village obligations for the next ten years are discussed. There are two upcoming dates that don’t conflict with Village Council meetings, and she urged anyone interested in multi-family housing to attend. There is a deadline of November 19, 2015, when the Village is required to present an outline to a judge of how the Village’s obligation will be accomplished. The Planning Board will be discussing affordable housing expectations on December 1, 2015, and December 15, 2015, at 7:30 P.M.
REAC – Councilman Sedon said that REAC will meet tomorrow at 6:00 P.M. in the Garden Room, followed by the Shade Tree Commission meeting at 7:30 P.M. He will have a report at the next meeting.
Chamber of Commerce – Mayor Aronsohn stated that the Board of Directors of the Ridgewood Chamber of Commerce will met on Wednesday, at 8:00 A.M.
Community Relations Advisory Board (CRAB) - Mayor Aronsohn reported that the Community Relations Advisory Board will hold its first Dwhali Festival tomorrow at the Library at 6:00 P.M.
9. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING IN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
Mayor Aronsohn explained that the vote on the multi-family housing will be carried to December 9, 2015.
a. Affordable Housing Obligation
Mayor Aronsohn recalled that the Village Council recently heard a presentation by Jeff Surienian, who is a specialist in affordable housing. Affordable housing has been an issue in front of both the Village Council and the Planning Board since the Supreme Court decision in March.
Mr. Rogers urged residents to watch last week’s meeting, which featured a succinct overview by Mr. Surienian of the history of affordable housing culminating in the State Supreme Court decision of March 2015. This decision recognizes that the legislature, the executive branch, and the State have not undertaken what was ordered by the Court to provide the method and process by which municipalities could meet the requirement to provide affordable housing. Since this proper action did not take place, the Court decided to make sure there was compliance by each municipality, and that there is a realistic possibility that affordable housing would be built in each one of these towns. A procedure was set up to ensure that this would happen. The Court gave the time from the date of the decision for municipalities to file an application seeking relief. Prior to this Supreme Court decision, the Village had submitted its Housing Element, including the Affordable Housing Program to the Council on Affordable Housing to achieve certification in what was then known as Round Two and Round Three from COAH. A decision was never received from COAH.
Mr. Rogers stated that the Court wants to see which towns have acted in good faith in the effort to provide low and moderate income housing. This required the filing of a Declaratory Judgement Act seeking this immunity, as well as a declaration from the Court that the Village has been acting in good faith, which would hopefully grant immunity to the Village, along with more time to adopt a housing element. The process requires the housing element be discussed and determined first by the Planning Board because the housing plan is one of the elements of the Master Plan. It can be separated from the Master Plan in order for the town to decide the location of affordable housing, and how it will be developed. The Village filed with the Court on July 7th, and was given five months after that date to submit the housing plan. There were several impediments, including the fact that there has been no determination as to the number of affordable units that must be supplied. The Court will be the arbitrator of who will decide on the number of units. There was a report from the Fair Share Housing Center indicating that the required allotment is over 1,000 units. Ridgewood has entered into a Shared Services Agreement with 250 other communities to have EConsult Services prepare the number of units to combat the number given by Fair Share Housing Center. This number is expected to be much lower than that given by Fair Share Housing. This report is expected by the end December, however, the housing plan is supposed to be submitted by December 7, 2015.
Mr. Rogers reported that the Village was in Court on October 22nd, and the Court was told that the Village is proceeding in good faith, but would need more time. The Court thought it was premature to appear on October 22nd and the Village was advised to come back to the Court closer to the December 7th date. Mr. Rogers said he would be filing an application with the Court to seek an extension in order to give the Village more time to come up with a number, because without the plan from EConsult Services, it will be difficult to satisfy the requirements of the Fair Share Housing Center. To meet the December 7th deadline, the Planning Board would have to come up with a housing plan that could be adopted and submitted to the Mayor and Council, which is not a lot of time.
Mr. Rogers said that the issue is how these ordinances will deal with the requirements of the Fair Share Housing Center. Since the decision to adopt an amendment to the Master Plan had already been made by the Planning Board, it was included and submitted in the Declaratory Judgement action. On October 22nd, Mr. Rogers informed the Court that the Village Council has carried these matters for further study with regard to these ordinances, and the new districts set up by the ordinances. The Village Council must act diligently in approaching the housing element, and the Village may have to state that these amendments to the Master Plan have been adopted by the Planning Board, but are still under consideration by the Mayor and Council.
Mr. Rogers recalled that the Court had appointed a Master to represent the interests of the Court relative to the relationship between the Village and any parties that have intervened in the case. As of this time, two of the developers involved in the multi-family amendments to the CBD and the Master must try to mediate or deal with this relationship, on behalf of the Court. The Master will make recommendations after discussing each side’s issues so that the Court can make the appropriate decision.
Mr. Rogers concluded, stating that there are time constraints with regard to proceedings, and there are a number of issues that affect the substance of the housing plan. In any event, the Village must act thoroughly and in a timely fashion.
Mayor Aronsohn asked about the possibility of filing for another extension. Mr. Rogers replied that if it is demonstrated that the Village is proceeding as diligently as possible, it is feasible that some relief might be granted. Many communities have made similar requests. Some have been denied outright, and others have been given extra time.
Councilwoman Knudsen commented that this is a very complex situation, and the Planning Board has committed to add meetings if necessary. Information on additional meetings will be posted on the Village website.
Councilman Sedon said that there are many numbers and he asked which way the Court would be leaning. Mr. Rogers said he has no idea, and this is what makes going forward so difficult.
Councilman Pucciarelli stated that he does not fully agree with Mr. Surienian’s positive approach toward the abilities of municipalities to defeat Builder’s Remedy lawsuits. He added that the Village Council does not make these decisions on their own because fortunately the Planning Board is charged by law, and has exclusive jurisdiction over any amendments to the Master Plan. The Planning Board came to the Village Council after 18 months of formal hearings, with recommendations after vetting all sides of the issue relative to multi-family housing.
b. Village Council’s Next Steps (financial impact study, schedule, etc.)
Mayor Aronsohn stated that on September 30th, after a long discussion on the ordinances relative to multi-family housing, there was a motion to conduct a financial impact study, in addition to other studies. Nothing has been done since, and the Village Council needs to discuss the best way forward. He suggested that perhaps the Planning Board information regarding the impact on infrastructure, sanitation, and water should be studied further, as well as gathering more testimony from the Superintendent of Schools.
Councilwoman Hauck noted the two important dates for affordable housing obligation, which are November 19th, and December 7th. If this issue is carried to December 9th, it falls after the December 7th deadline, and she wondered what would happen if the Planning Board indicated that they have no idea how the affordable housing obligation will be met. Councilwoman Hauck suggested submitting a plan on November 19th, which shows a good faith effort that the Village can come up with 40 or 50 units. As a result, the Judge may be more lenient, and grant a three-month extension. Councilwoman Hauck said that in her opinion, the Planning Board must come up with locations, ways and means of providing Ridgewood’s obligation. If the Planning Board comes up with a number that has not been ratified by the Village Council, the Judge may not view it to be a good faith effort. Councilwoman Hauck said that she has read that in suburban municipalities, the highest benefit on a per acre basis is retail, closely followed by mixed use and high density housing, and this includes education. She would expect any studies they commission to come to the same conclusions.
Councilman Sedon indicated that a financial impact study wasn’t done at the Planning Board level, and would be beneficial. He is open to discussing some of the other studies to see what they could learn about multi-family housing in the downtown. The big problem is that the beginning of December is when the Village must submit its Fair Share Housing Plan, but they won’t know the number until the end of the month. Ridgewood has probably done more to undertake this effort than surrounding municipalities, but their backs are against the wall even though they are moving forward by doing several studies.
Councilman Pucciarelli stated that the Village Council needs to accept the findings and conclusions of the Planning Board, and then decide if they accept or reject their recommendations. He voted against the financial study at a previous meeting, and he pointed out that you can get the results you want in this type of a study by allocating expenses. He feels that this is about zoning, and he asked Mr. Rogers if this is a question of building what the taxpayers are willing to do, based on the tax increase they are willing to sustain. The Planning Board didn’t consider this, but they need to know whether this is the affordable housing criteria.
Mr. Rogers said that his interpretation of the financial impact study relates to the impact on the community of the development of these proposals. It appeared that the Village Council thought this was something that should be explored and investigated. The years of hearings in front of the Planning Board on the Master Plan came to an end, in conjunction with decision of the State Supreme Court, which gave a limited time period for action. Decisions have to be made using the principals of sound zoning and planning and the economic impact may have some significance. Councilman Pucciarelli said he is not sure whether the outcome of this study will guide the Village Council to build a specific number of low income housing units. He pointed out that this is not a valid reason to delay the process and tell the Court that nothing has been done, because the Village is not sure how much it will cost. Councilman Pucciarelli concluded that he is skeptical as to what the study will reveal about this issue.
Councilwoman Knudsen continues to support a financial impact study, which was voted on favorably at the meeting of September 30th. The issue of multi-family housing is compounded by the fact that they are not sure what is happening with the Kensington Assisted Living Facility, along with the parking garage proposed for Hudson Street. The Central Business District (CBD) is undergoing sweeping changes, which also impacts the arteries leading in and out and makes this a much bigger picture. This is why Councilwoman Knudsen believes they need to move forward with a financial impact study and a more comprehensive traffic circulation and impact study.
Mayor Aronsohn said that a financial impact study makes sense because it will raise questions for consideration. It will factor in the impact on the schools, which is a big unknown. The Village had its own traffic expert and has looked at the public safety impact and impact on infrastructure. Mayor Aronsohn recommended moving forward with the financial impact study. They should review the years of Planning Board hearings and bring together the studies and testimony given by public safety officials, and the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee to see if there are any gaps. Mayor Aronsohn stated that the financial impact study seems to be the missing part of the puzzle, and they would be best served to move forward with it.
Councilwoman Knudsen spoke about circulation and traffic in the CBD, and said there is a potential for so much congestion. Comprehensive studies should be done as part of the due diligence undertaken by the Village Council. Mayor Aronsohn stated that Maser Associates conducted a comprehensive study and pointed out the impact of multi-family housing as opposed to other uses. He recommended reviewing what has been done and paid for, and any gaps found will have to be filled.
Ms. Sonenfeld recalled that Ridgewood Water did a study on the water and the Village Engineer did a study on sanitary sewage treatment. Mazer Associates did studies of the Enclave and Chestnut Village, and the Ridgewood Police Department did something on the Dayton piece. She had asked the police to do a study on service calls from apartments versus single family homes to learn the impact on staffing. Ms. Sonenfeld said that she doesn’t understand what the Village Council wants to have as part of the financial study and she advised that it be very specific. They should identify someone with this expertise who could help to define what they are looking for.
Mayor Aronsohn stated there are many variables, such as the rental charge, and the number of units that will be built versus another commercial establishment that could be built in the same space, along with impacts on public safety, the schools, and so on. Ms. Sonenfeld suggested using the Financial Advisory Committee. Councilwoman Hauck agreed, stating that the Committee has been fair and impartial throughout their existence. Variables can be manipulated because so much data is required and must be verified. Councilman Pucciarelli said that as a taxpayer, he does not want to pay for a professional study where the assumptions are going to dictate the answer because that type of study will be of no value. Councilwoman Hauck stated that a study would give everyone a certain reference point. Councilman Pucciarelli reiterated that the study will not provide any useful or relevant information.
Councilman Sedon said that a design was presented for 106 apartments on the Brogan site, along with square footage of the apartments. There are specific renderings for the other sites as well, that could be used as a basis for the study.
Mayor Aronsohn said they need to move forward, and he asked Ms. Sonenfeld to do some research, and look into how other towns have handled similar situations. Ms. Sonenfeld said she would speak to Councilwoman Hauck, who has indicated that she has the names of some firms that have done similar studies. She will then get several Councilmembers, Mr. Rooney and the Village Planner to meet with representatives of at least two of these firms to get an idea of what is involved. Mayor Aronsohn said that this sounds like a good starting point. He asked audience members to email Ms. Sonenfeld if they know of anyone or any professional that might be able to offer assistance.
Councilman Pucciarelli asked about the budget for this study. Ms. Sonenfeld said that there is no money available for this at the moment, which means it would have to wait until January, or they would have to agree to an emergency appropriation from next year’s budget. Councilwoman Knudsen said if the baseline described by Councilman Sedon was used, the worst-case scenario may come back as being not too bad after all.
Councilman Pucciarelli questioned the impact of this study on the Village’s obligation to meet their affordable housing obligation. Mayor Aronsohn said the study would only offer additional information and, perhaps, raise additional questions that can be weighed along with the other information. Councilwoman Knudsen reiterated that this is a piece of the puzzle as stated by Mayor Aronsohn and the Planning Board is also looking at other creative options.
10. ORDINANCES
a. Introduction - #3509 – Amend Various Salary Ordinances
Mayor Aronsohn moved the first reading of Ordinance 3509. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3509 by title:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SALARY ORDINANCE 3397 FIXING THE SALARIES, WAGES AND OTHER COMPENSATION FOR WHITE COLLAR EMPLOYEES; AND TO AMEND SALARY ORDINANCE 3437 FIXING SALARIES, WAGES AND OTHER COMPENSATION OF AND FOR THE SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES; AND TO AMEND SALARY ORDINANCE 3444, FIXING SALARIES, WAGES AND OTHER COMPENSATION AND TO ESTABLISH THE “EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT” OF CERTAIN NON-UNION EMPLOYEES OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, COUNTY OF BERGEN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY; AND TO AMEND SALARY ORDINANCE 3445, FIXING SALARIES, WAGES AND OTHER COMPENSATION OF NON-UNION EMPLOYEES OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, COUNTY OF BERGEN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Councilman Sedon moved that Ordinance 3509 be adopted on first reading and that December 9, 2015, be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
b. Introduction - #3510 – Amend Chapter 105 – Animals – Cats – Establish a 3-Year Cat License
Mayor Aronsohn moved the first reading of Ordinance 3510. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3510 by title:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 105, ARTICLE VII OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE CODE, CATS, AT SECTION 105-46, LICENSE REQUIRED, TO ESTABLISH 3-YEAR CAT LICENSING
Councilwoman Hauck moved that Ordinance 3510 be adopted on first reading and that December 9, 2015 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
c. Introduction - #3511 – Amend Chapter 145 Fees – Fees for 3-Year Cat License
Mayor Aronsohn moved the first reading of Ordinance 3511. Councilwoman Hauck seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3511 by title:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 145 OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE CODE, FEES, AT SECTION 145-6, ENUMERATION OF FEES RELATING TO CODE CHAPTERS, AT CHAPTER 105, ANIMALS, TO ESTABLISH FEES FOR A 3-YEAR CAT LICENSE
Councilwoman Knudsen moved that Ordinance 3511 be adopted on first reading and that December 9, 2015 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilwoman Hauck seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
d. Introduction - #3512 – Amend Valet Parking Ordinance
Mayor Aronsohn moved the first reading of Ordinance 3512. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3512 by title:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 263 of THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, VALET PARKING SERVICES, AT SECTION 263-4, “OPERATING REQUIREMENTS” AND SECTION 263-5, “VIOLATIONS” AND SECTION 265-29, “PARKING METER ZONES DESIGNATED” AND SECTION 265-72, “LOADING ZONES”
Councilman Sedon moved that Ordinance 3512 be adopted on first reading and that December 9, 2015 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
e. Introduction - #3513 – Non-Union Salary Ordinance
Mayor Aronsohn moved the first reading of Ordinance 3513. Councilwoman Hauck seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3513 by title:
AN ORDINANCE TO FIX SALARIES, WAGES, AND OTHER COMPENSATION OF NON-UNION EMPLOYEES OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, COUNTY OF BERGEN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY FOR THE YEAR 2015
Councilman Sedon moved that Ordinance 3513 be adopted on first reading and that December 9, 2015 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilwoman Hauck seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
f. Introduction - #3514 – Management Salary Ordinance
Mayor Aronsohn moved the first reading of Ordinance 3514. Councilwoman Hauck seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3514 by title:
AN ORDINANCE TO FIX SALARIES, WAGES AND OTHER COMPENSATION AND TO ESTABLISH THE “EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT” OF CERTAIN NON-UNION OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, COUNTY OF BERGEN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY FOR THE YEAR 2015
Councilman Sedon moved that Ordinance 3514 be adopted on first reading and that December 9, 2015 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilwoman Hauck seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
g. Public Hearing - #3489 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Establish AH-2 Zone District
Mayor Aronsohn moved the fourth reading of Ordinance 3489. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3489 by title:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD AMENDING THE ZONE CLASSIFICATION AND REGULATIONS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM THE B-2 ZONE DISTRICT INTO A NEW AH-2 ZONE DISTRICT
Mayor Aronsohn announced that the Public Hearing was open.
David Slomin, 36 Heights Road, commented on the purpose of the recommended studies. He stated that Mr. Surienian’s report last week was very informative, and contained the information that everyone needs. Mr. Slomin said he attended almost every Planning Board meeting over the last three years, and the data was predominantly supplied by developers. He spoke to the traffic expert for the Planning Board, who indicated that he was reacting to the data provided by the developers and that the Village needed to do their own study. Mr. Slomin said that COAH is being used as a scare tactic, and he referred to Mr. Surienian’s comment that there is a track record in the Courts that favors municipalities. Mr. Slomin stated that if Mr. Surienian had addressed the Planning Board, the vote may have been different. Mr. Surienian said that a municipality should only be subject to a Builder’s Remedy lawsuit if it can be proven that the municipality is constitutionally non-compliant. Mr. Slomin stated that Ridgewood is not non-compliant, and the Fair Share Housing Act established favorable standards for municipalities. This matter is at the lower Court level, which is why there are appellant courts. Mr. Slomin asked the Village Council to go forward with the studies that were agreed upon at the previous meeting.
Greg Ricca, 42 Heights Road, recalled that at the last meeting, a number of studies, including a financial study, were voted on and approved. Mr. Rogers said that there was a four to one vote, but he wasn’t sure if all the studies were identified, and in order to find out, the audio of the meeting should be listened to or the minutes should be read. Mayor Aronsohn stated that the Village Council has agreed to go forward with the financial impact study tonight.
Mr. Ricca suggested that the way to deal with Fair Share Housing and the time constraints would be to come up with a proposal and defer the multi-family ordinances until the judicial response is issued. The response will indicate the numbers of units, which could then be imposed on the developers.
Paul Vagianos, 280 Rivera Court, said that he thinks that a Builder’s Remedy lawsuit will eventually become the outcome here, and he urged the Village Council to be very careful about putting this issue into the hands of a judge. Thirty-five units an acre may sound like a lot, but the Village could be required to provide many more units if this goes before a judge. He asked that control not be handed over to a judge. Regarding studies, Mr. Vagianos said that this issue had been studied to death and the Village Council has enough information to make a decision.
Diane Palacios, 342 North Van Dien Avenue, referred to the comment made previously that higher density housing would change the character of the downtown. She consulted a dictionary and said that character can mean style, personality or trait, as well as referring to moral attributes. High density will change the personality and quality of Ridgewood.
Ms. Palacios said she opposes changing the style and traits of Ridgewood. The Village should adhere to what the original Master Plan calls for, which is twelve units on each of the four properties being considered for development. If this is not done, the quality of life in Ridgewood will deteriorate and will become more crowded and unpleasant.
Linda Kotch, 60 North Hillside Place, stated that it is easy to understand that the more units that are built, the worse the traffic situation will become. She asked if the Village could be forced to accommodate more affordable housing if the Master Plan were not amended. She asked if the Master Plan called for twelve units per acre, how could a judge deem which open space needs to be developed in order to accommodate affordable housing. She asked if affordable housing was calculated on a percentage basis for 25,000 residents. She wondered how a municipality can tell one developer that they have to build affordable units and tell another developer that they don’t. Ms. Kotch said that the Supreme Court ruling seems hasty, when various studies should be a critical part of the process. She referred to a comment from Councilman Pucciarelli and said she is confused about exactly what affordable means or is it the town that is affordable.
Councilman Pucciarelli stated that he questioned what Ridgewood could afford as a town, and he would like to see the tax burden left as it has been over the past few years. He commented that if the Village doesn’t come up with a number of affordable units, the judge will decide how many affordable units should be permitted per acre.
Mr. Rogers explained that affordable is broken into low and moderate income, so that certain units can only be purchased or utilized by people who meet a certain income maximum or threshold. The numbers are income driven and Mr. Rogers said he is not sure whether they will stay the same as was set by COAH some time ago. The mandate came from the New Jersey Supreme Court in the initial Mount Laurel ruling that a certain number of low and moderate affordable housing units must be provided by each municipality. The number is based on a variety of things such as open space and other developments in the community. The Fair Share Housing Act eliminated the threat of the Builder’s Remedy lawsuit provided that the municipality adopt and submit a housing element to the Council on Affordable Housing for certification. Ridgewood did this in the 1990s, and in 2008; however, COAH was found to be unconstitutional and, in 2010, the Courts gave COAH and the executive branch a period of time to develop new regulations. This was never done and the Courts took over the process. The Courts will decide what the number and the criteria should be and Mr. Rogers concluded that this is a very complex and mind boggling exercise.
Councilwoman Knudsen said that a “set aside” is a percentage of a number of units per acre. The existing zoning is twelve units per acre on several of the locations pertaining to the Master Plan amendments; however, one is higher at 22 units or 24 units per acre. She explained that low and moderate income is regionally adjusted. The regional adjustment in this area of Bergen County is a family of four earning approximately $48,000.
John Saraceno, 17 Coventry Court, said that he wants a fair process that doesn’t discuss and deal with issues that are not based in fact. He stated that John Jahr, the Village traffic expert, reported his findings that were done without the benefit of developer influence or reports. To say that his decision was based on information supplied to him by the developer is completely baseless. Mr. Saraceno added that not one member of the Village staff was provided with information supplied by the developer. He pointed out that Mr. Jahr’s testimony was based on 50 units per acre and not 35 units per acre. Mr. Saraceno said that the Planning Board hearings consisted of a multitude of information provided independently and not by developers. There is a perception that the threats by COAH are a result of the process; however, the hearings have taken a long time and have coincidentally crossed with the Supreme Court decision on affordable housing. Mr. Saraceno stated he is sure the Planning Board would vote the same way, with or without the Affordable Housing decision. Four years ago, the Planning Board voted that they did not want more commercial development in the Village because of problems connected with parking and traffic. He added that more commercial development leads to additional affordable housing obligation. Affordable housing is driving the conversation today because the deadline has arrived.
Mr. Saraceno finds it disconcerting that the facts are not discussed and that more respect is not given to the people on the Planning Board, who worked for four years and struggled with these issues. He stated that everyone on the Planning Board felt that residential or multi-family housing was a better use than any of the alternatives.
Councilwoman Knudsen recalled that at the last meeting, four studies were voted on and included a comprehensive traffic impact study, financial impact study, infrastructure study, and school study. She continues to support these studies. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she holds John Jahr in high regard. She spoke about a letter from Kevin Walsh of Fair Share Housing, which is an advocacy group. The letter was emailed to the Planning Board members and she thought this was improper because it became an issue behind the scenes. She recommended that the email be read into the record for the benefit of the residents, but it would have been prudent to have Mr. Walsh testify, because it became testimony when it was read.
Pat Gerber, 375 Glenwood Road, said that 35 units per acre sounds big, but he has no idea, and he would feel better having a reference point or additional information, which might come by means of a financial impact study. The study would make him feel comfortable that the Village has the knowledge necessary to move in the right direction.
Lorraine Reynolds, 550 Wyndemere Avenue, recalled a meeting prior to the public hearing, when John Jahr made a presentation. She remembered that he said a comprehensive traffic study was necessary because he had only looked at specific intersections. Ms. Reynolds said that Mr. Surienian mentioned that the Village shouldn’t let developers come in with obscene densities and she added that builders will scare the towns, and the towns have a responsibility to object to these densities. Ms. Reynolds agreed with Mr. Rogers when he said that fear should not be the leader or the driver here, but they must all do the right thing for Ridgewood.
Kathryn Schmidt, 123 South Irving Street, appreciates the decision of the Council to move forward with the financial study. The Village Council needs to consider what this development will do in terms of raising the tax base and bringing in more income. This may allay many resident concerns. Ms. Schmidt attended the Planning Board meetings and said that several members had requested these studies as well. The decision by the Planning Board was not unanimous and many members opposed moving forward with the five ordinances. One member indicated he was voting in favor because of the threat of a lawsuit from the developers. Ms. Schmidt said she favors this development, but suggested that they construct one or two of these developments to see what happens before they approve all four.
Amy Bourque, 133 Sheridan Terrace, stated that a financial impact study should be done by someone who is independent and has no relationship with any of the parties involved. She feels that all of this lacks vision for the future and this is the reason why people want the density cut back to something more reasonable and buildable. It is important to look into whether there are other properties or areas that might be more suited to this type of development. Ms. Bourque asked that the Village Council be diligent.
Andrew Watson, 300 Highland Avenue, said he attended the Planning Board meetings and he remembered that the Village Planner testified that in his professional opinion, the Village would be able to meet its obligation through the use of 35 units. He indicated he hadn’t done an analysis using a density of 20, 25, or 30 in terms of a cost benefit analysis. Mr. Watson asked why studies using a range of number were not done by the Village Planner.
Councilwoman Knudsen responded that she didn’t know where 35 units per acre came from, and she questioned why they shouldn’t stay at 12 units per acre or perhaps 24 units per acre. The number 35 did not come from the Planning Board collectively, and there was no vote taken until after 35 units per acre was included in the amendment.
Mr. Rogers suggested that the Village Council look into this. Mayor Aronsohn agreed and said that it would be beneficial to have the Village Planner attend a meeting in order to explain the process of how he arrived at that number. Councilman Pucciarelli agreed and stated that it is obvious that density is a huge concern and they need to start by reexamining density, which is a zoning issue, especially before a financial impact study is undertaken. Councilwoman Hauck said that the financial impact study should also include commercially zoned property.
Councilwoman Hauck stated that the Floor Area Ratio (FAR), which is a significant factor, had not been reduced to the same extent as the units per acre. Councilman Pucciarelli said that density is fueling this debate, but there are so many other items to be considered, including on-site parking, 40 square feet of amenity space both inside and outside; and the fact that the building can’t exceed 50 feet in height. He said that he is not sure whether any of these sites can accommodate 35 units per acre.
Mr. Watson commented that it is hard to put a number on character and how the size of the building is going to affect the character of Ridgewood. This is what people find most upsetting.
Robert Kotch, 6 North Hillside Place, stated that at the last meeting there was a vote and a commitment to undertake four studies, including financial, traffic, education, and infrastructure. He asked if the Village Council was still committed to those four studies. Mayor Aronsohn indicated that there is agreement that a financial impact study makes sense. They should reserve judgement on the other studies, while they examine what has already been done, in order to avoid duplication.
Councilwoman Hauck said that she doesn’t want to agree to a study unless she has a clear understanding of the cost and the parameters of the study. It is difficult to agree to something like this at such a late hour, but if there is evidence that the Village Council voted on three of four different studies she will stand by it.
Mr. Kotch said he remains confused by what the Village Council voted to do at the last meeting. He questioned the consequence of being non-compliant with the Affordable Housing Plan. Mr. Rogers explained that if a municipality is found to be non-compliant, all zoning and land use ordinances lose their presumption of validity and the municipality becomes subject to Builder’s Remedy lawsuits. This means that when the developer files suit, the Court will determine what will be developed in the municipality. The downside is that the municipality loses control of the ability to make a determination as to the kind of development that can go on within the confines of the municipality. Because municipal ordinances are no longer valid, a builder could introduce a use that had not been permitted in the past and there is a chance it would be allowed by the Court.
Mr. Kotch said he finds it frustrating that they are discussing density and other issues that were brought up by three individual corporations. It is important for the town to discuss their vision for downtown Ridgewood; however, the push forward should not be initiated by three developers. It should be a collective town effort.
Carrie Giordano, 57 North Hillside Place, said that the studies should not be something to be afraid of. The studies will inform and could potentially help the builders. With the potential senior living facility and the Hudson Street parking garage it would be good to have as much information as possible even if just for traffic purposes. Ms. Giordano said that the 35 units per acre are regular units, not the units specified as affordable. The affordable units make up only 15% of the entire development, which is quite low and may not help the woman who spoke earlier. She wondered if a greater percentage of the units should be affordable. Ms. Giordano encouraged the Village Council to go forward with the studies.
Ed Feldsott, 67 Heights Road, said that he attended the last meeting on this subject and stayed until the end. He clearly remembers that the Village Council voted to go forward with several studies and he said he hopes the Village Council does not waiver on their decision. Many people were present or watched the meeting on television and are fully aware of what the Village Council voted to do. He urged the Village Council to live up to their commitment.
Councilwoman Knudsen said that she remembered John Jahr stating that a more comprehensive traffic study of the entire central business district was needed and that is why she suggested studies at the September 30th Village Council meeting.
There were no other comments from the public, and Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Public Hearing on Ordinance #3489 be continued to December 9, 2015. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
h. Public Hearing - #3490 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Establish B-3-R Zone District
Mayor Aronsohn moved the fourth reading of Ordinance 3490 and that the Public Hearing be opened. Councilwoman Hauck seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers, Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3490 by title:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD CHANGING THE ZONE CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM THE B-1, B-2 AND C ZONE DISTRICTS TO A NEW B-3-R ZONE DISTRICT AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR THE NEW B-3-R ZONE DISTRICT
Mayor Aronsohn announced that the Public Hearing was open.
Lorraine Reynolds, 550 Wyndemere Avenue, asked if Jeffrey Surienian could be hired as a consultant for the Village.
Amy Bourque, 130 Sheridan Terrace, said that Mr. Jahr’s traffic studies were unique to each property, but he never discussed the impact of the development of all four properties. He indicated to her that the Planning Board did not ask him to do a collective study. Developers should be made to pay into a fund specifically for the purpose of road widening, the addition of traffic signals and other improvements.
David Slomin, 36 Heights Road, said that this process was not a forward thinking, comprehensive look started by the Planning Board and the Village to examine what should be done in the Village for the future. It started as a reaction to the application for the development of up to 50 units per acre. Mr. Slomin said that everyone is here because they love Ridgewood and have a vision for the Village. Throughout the entire process at the Planning Board, residents were never asked or included in the discussions. He agreed with Councilman Pucciarelli that density is what people focus on and most of the residents he knows support affordable, multi-family housing, but the Village Council must consider the scope and scale and what is right for Ridgewood.
Mr. Slomin understands that these studies will be somewhat speculative, but there is nothing at this time that can be used as a reference point. He attended many Planning Board meetings and commented that most of the information came as reactions to data provided by the developers, who are biased parties. The developers are trying to create their own vision of Ridgewood in order to make more profit. It is the job of the Village Council and the Planning Board to do what the people want. Mr. Slomin encouraged the Village Council to keep their commitment to the residents for a comprehensive study that residents have been requesting for some time.
Councilwoman Hauck addressed the issue of bias on the studies that have been done and on Ordinance #3066. She explained that the money that paid for these independent studies had been put into an escrow account by the developer. The people who conducted these studies were either Village employees or other professionals hired by the Village and not by the developers. She added that Ordinance #3066 was written because the Village couldn’t afford endless studies. The escrow money is earmarked for independent consultant work or Village employee input. If they continue to go out to solicit independent consultants to back other consultants, the Village is not paying attention. She explained that the fact that developers put the money into an escrow account does not mean that the testimony of the expert consultant is biased. She recalled that the developers hired experts of their own and that testimony was very consistent with that of the other experts. They would rather have started with a Master Plan re-examination, but sometimes the timing of the events means that things driven by applications will become part of the Master Plan evaluation.
Mayor Aronsohn said that since he has been on the Planning Board, there have been several incidents where members chose to take a step back and look at the big picture. In 2013, there was a unanimous decision made to go forward and explore the issue of multi-family housing. There were thoughtful and deliberate approaches by the Planning Board. Councilman Pucciarelli said that he was on the Planning Board at that time when multi-family housing was discussed at the work session. Mr. Brancheau, the Village Planner, presented a survey for all of the properties that might be candidates for multi-family housing in and about the CBD. There was a lot of discussion of changing zoning that would accommodate multi-family housing as opposed to the required commercial zoning.
Councilman Pucciarelli said that Ordinance #3066 is often misquoted. It did not empower developers to petition before the Planning Board for a change to the Master Plan, but shifted the cost of that exercise to the applicant. He sees no reason to repeal this ordinance and added that researching the history of the ordinance must be done to see how it evolved.
Councilwoman Knudsen stated that if a history of the development of the Master Plan is reviewed, it would show that residents have been surveyed from time to time, since the 1930s, to learn what is important to them and how they envision the development and growth of the Village of Ridgewood. The problem now seems to be that if one person came to the Planning Board to request an amendment to the Master Plan that person would be talking specifically about one property. In this instance, four properties are included and the essence of a Master Plan is lost, as is a survey of the residents and all important input has fallen by the wayside. Councilwoman Knudsen commented that perhaps a different approach is needed when multiple applicants come forward with a sweeping change.
There were no further comments from the public and Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Public Hearing on Ordinance 3490 be continued to December 9, 2015. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
i. Public Hearing - #3491 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Establish C-R Zone
Mayor Aronsohn moved the fourth reading of Ordinance 3491 and that the Public Hearing is opened. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3491 by title:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD CHANGING THE ZONE CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM THE C ZONE DISTRICT TO A NEW C-R ZONE DISTRICT AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR THE NEW C-R ZONE DISTRICT
Mayor Aronsohn announced that the Public Hearing was open.
There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Public Hearing on Ordinance 3491 be continued to December 9, 2015. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
j. Public Hearing - #3492 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Establish C- Zone District
Mayor Aronsohn moved the fourth reading of Ordinance 3492. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3492 by title:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD AMENDING THE ZONE REGULATIONS FOR THE C ZONE DISTRICT
Mayor Aronsohn announced that the Public Hearing was open. No one came forward to comment and Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Public Hearing on Ordinance 3492 be continued to December 9, 2015. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
k. Public Hearing - #3493 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land use and Development – Amend Various Sections – Multiple Zone Districts and General Affordable Housing Regulations
Mayor Aronsohn moved the fourth reading of Ordinance 3493. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3493 by title:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD AMENDING VARIOUS DEFINITIONS AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO INCLUSIONARY DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL ZONES, YARDS ABUTTING RAILROADS, NUMBER OF PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS, PARKING BENEATH BUILDINGS, SIGNS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICTS, OUTDOOR STORAGE IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, DISPLAY OF MOTOR VEHICLES FOR SALE, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES FOR RESIDENTIAL USES
Mayor Aronsohn announced that the Public Hearing was open. No one came forward to comment and Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Public Hearing on Ordinance 3493 be continued to December 9, 2015. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
l. Public Hearing - #3507 – Amend Bond Ordinance – Change in Description and Average Useful Life – Ridgewood Public Library
Mayor Aronsohn moved the second reading of Ordinance 3507. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3507 by title:
BOND ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 3(1) AND SECTION 6(b) OF BOND ORDINANCE NUMBERED 3475 OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, NEW JERSEY FINALLY ADOPTED MAY 13, 2015 IN ORDER TO AMEND THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND THE AVERAGE USEFUL LIFE
Mayor Aronsohn announced that the Public Hearing was open. No one came forward and Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Public Hearing be closed. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.
Councilwoman Knudsen moved that Ordinance 3507 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
m. Public Hearing - #3508 – Amend Fine for CBD Employee Parking
Mayor Aronsohn moved the second reading of Ordinance 3508. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3508 by title:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-80, ARTICLE X: “CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT EMPLOYEE PARKING”
Mayor Aronsohn announced that the Public Hearing was open. No one came forward and Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Public Hearing be closed. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Councilman Pucciarelli moved that Ordinance 3508 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon and Mayor Aronsohn
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
11. RESOLUTIONS
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 15-343 THROUGH 15-371 WERE ADOPTED BY A CONSENT AGENDA, WITH ONE VOTE BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL AND WERE READ BY TITLE ONLY:
12. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, referred to Resolution #15-361 for a change order regarding Rinbrand Well Drilling. Mr. Loving stated that the original charge for this order was $66,000 and it is now up to $259,500, which is 288% above the initial cost. These change orders are scary, especially when the Village is considering spending between $12 and $15 million on a parking garage. Mr. Loving recalled that Village Hall was supposed to cost $4.5 million; however, at completion, the cost was over $11 million. Building the sidewalk ramp at Graydon Pool went 30% over budget, which was an error in mathematics on the part of the Engineering Department according to the Village Manager. Mr. Loving said he finds it hard to believe that none of the Councilmembers questioned the fact that this change order is 288% above the estimated cost. Mr. Loving recommended putting controls in place to make sure that change orders do not become common place if the parking garage goes forward.
Ms. Sonenfeld said she described the change order in detail last week. The original bid included labor and a mark-up on parts. This bidder came in better on the labor side and the volume for the parts went up because of NJDEP and USEPA issues, as well as emergencies and problems that came up during the summer. The vendor who was selected had the best price, and the best quality and the Village had worked with them in the past.
13. ADOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Hauck, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the meeting was adjourned at 11:20 P.M.
_________________________________ Paul S. Aronsohn Mayor
_________________________________ Heather A. Mailander Village Clerk
- Hits: 3088