20181212 - Village Council Regular Public Meeting Minutes

A REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOD, NEW JERSEY ON DECEMBER 12, 2018 AT 8:00 P.M.

 

  1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG     SALUTE

 

Mayor Hache called the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act.  At roll call the following were present: Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache.  Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney. 

 

Mayor Hache led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag as well as in a Moment of Silence to honor the brave men and women serving in our armed forces and all our first responders.

 

  1. ACCEPTANCE OF FINANCIAL REPORTS

 

Mayor Hache moved the Bills, Claims, and Vouchers, and Statement of Funds on Hand as of November 30, 2018, be accepted as submitted.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      Councilwoman Knudsen

 

  1. PROCLAMATIONS

 

  1. DRIVE SOBER OR GET PULLED OVER – 2018 YEAR END HOLIDAY STATEWIDE CRACKDOWN

 

Mayor Hache read the following proclamation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. PRESENTATION BY JOHN ANTOLA, NY OPERATIONS, FM GLOBAL – FIRE PREVENTION GRANT

 

John Antola, of FM Global, stated that they are one of the world’s largest property insurance carriers, and their charitable organization, The FM Global Foundation, provides assistance with grants for Fire Departments.  Ridgewood Fire Chief, James Van Goor applied for a grant, and it has been awarded in the amount of $4,100 to help with portable pre-planning information that provides vital information at the fingertips of the men and women of the Fire Department.  He congratulated Chief Van Goor on behalf of FM Global.

 

5.           COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Marcia Ringel, 250 Ferris Place, stated that regarding the Adopt A Tree and Bench ordinance she didn’t think it was written clearly in the portion where the responsibility for maintenance is by the resident for the tree located in the right of way.  She added that it didn’t say anything about the mechanism for purchasing a tree in the ordinance.

 

Tom Wells, Attorney with Wells, Jaworski and Liebman, stated that he was providing a letter to the Village Clerk as he was representing the Bolger Family regarding the Chestnut Village Project which is now under construction, after a seven year process.  He added that he has written to the Village Council on four occasions, September 20, September 26, October 30, and November 20 asking to meet with the Village Council so they could appoint a special attorney regarding the resolution for the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement that is going to be voted on this evening.  They do not agree with the legislation and the Village Council has not seen fit to meet with them, however, he was notified on Monday that a special attorney, Mr. Marinello, has been appointed by the Village Council, and Mr. Wells has been in conversation with Mr. Marinello since that time; however, Mr. Marinello is still getting up to speed on this matter. 

 

Mr. Wells stated that due to the fact that Mr. Marinello was just appointed, he would strongly urge the Village Council not to take action this evening, because the Bolger family does not believe the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement being considered is appropriate.  He added that the Bolger family, during the Planning Board hearing process and in the final resolution, indicated that it wanted to build special needs housing at the Chestnut Village Project because they have a deep connection and affiliation with another long-term Ridgewood institution, West Bergen Mental Healthcare.  He stated that this Village Council and the Village’s professionals have ignored that and have instead chosen to do a project with United Way in another location, adding that he does not know why they are exclusive and both cannot be done.  Mr. Wells stated that the current plan for seven family units at the Chestnut Village Project is not correct and they will vigorously oppose this process.

 

Mr. Wells stated that he and his clients were much less concerned about the areas that were re-zoned in the Village, but they are deeply concerned about the fact that the Village Council arbitrarily decided that they can’t build special needs housing in an alternate location.  He added that he did not appreciate the disrespect that has been shown to the Bolger family by the Village Council.

 

Michael Tozzoli, CEO at West Bergen Mental Healthcare, 120 Chestnut Street, stated that he was happy to educate the Village Council about West Bergen Mental Healthcare, as with almost 300 staff, they are one of the larger employers in the Village and quietly treat many of its residents.  He added that one in four people suffer from mental illness.  They are very proud of their long, deep history in the Village and were formed in 1963 by Mr. Sealfons, of Sealfons Department Store.  He added that they have a long history of special needs housing in Ridgewood, Midland Park, Ramsey, Mahwah, Paramus, Waldwick, and soon to be Franklin Lakes. 

 

Mr. Tozzoli stated that they would like for the Village Council to reflect on the special needs project that they have on Chestnut Street, which is a group home that has been in existence for quite a while.  The plan with the Bolger family and West Bergen Mental Healthcare will allow the clients that will be seen by professionals and those who live in the house to have an incredibly better life at 84 Chestnut Street.  Mr. Tozzoli added that he would like to be clear that there are more people that need special needs housing, than can fit into the house.  The number of people that need special needs housing far exceed the beds, and so he asked that the Village Council consider the plan that West Bergen Mental Healthcare and the Bolger family have put forth, and to be thoughtful about that, as it relates to the needs of the Ridgewood-based West Bergen Mental Healthcare.

 

Justin Manger, 590 Cliff Street, stated that he was new to Ridgewood and he was very excited about the Master Plan project as he joined the Green Team and recently became the Chair.  The Green Team’s main task is to enhance and maintain the Village’s Silver Certification that it received from Sustainable Jersey last year.  He added that the Green Team works hand in hand with the Ridgewood Environmental Advisory Committee (REAC), and pointed out that environmental issues are also economic issues, with cost savings and business opportunities linked to eco-minded sustainable choices.  Mr. Manger stated that he thinks the Village has an opportunity to continue greening our community through the Master Plan, so they can be a leader in this sustainability effort which will improve property values and quality of life.  He added that the Village has a good recycling program and a nice recycling center, generates power with solar panel installations, and protects and preserves greenspace.  He believes that the Village should build on this foundation as our society is on the verge of a major shift towards greener practices. 

 

Mr. Manger stated that Glen Rock recently unveiled two electric vehicle chargers in the downtown, and there are no chargers in the Village that he is aware of, suggesting that maybe some should be installed in the new parking garage.  He added that the Green Team can work with planning for this and other suitable locations, which is just one way that they can help the Village move to sustainability.  He stated that Styrofoam recycling, plastic bag recycling and bans on plastic bags, composting are all being worked on, through The Green Team and REAC.  Mr. Manger stated that sustainability should be a tenet of the Master Plan and be central to any planning that the Village undertakes going forward.  They are looking forward to working with NV5 on the Visioning Process and he thinks that sustainability encompasses environmentalism, but there is also a social and economic component that makes for a powerful trio: people, planet, and profits.  He ended by saying that the Master Plan provides a powerful opportunity to address all three at once.

 

J.T. Bolger, Managing Member at 240 Associates Chestnut Village, LLC, stated that following Mr. Wells and Mr. Tozzoli, they have spoken from the beginning before the Planning Board for the past six years and have always included special needs housing because it is needed.  It was always their intent to meet their affordable housing obligation through providing special needs housing, as his family has had a long-standing relationship with West Bergen Mental Healthcare.  He added that the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement resolution that is being considered tonight is flawed as it is not taking into consideration the relationship between West Bergen Mental Healthcare and the Bolger Family.  The resolution that was adopted by the Planning Board should also be looked at in regard to their affordable housing obligation at Chestnut Village being met with special needs housing at another location.  He added that his family and West Bergen Mental Healthcare are well-woven into the fabric of Ridgewood and he requests that they have an open dialogue as they have sent over four letters.

 

Matthew Murphy, 315 Kenilworth Road, stated that he was the proud parent of two children, has lived in Ridgewood for almost twenty years, is the Vice President of West Bergen Mental Healthcare, and is the Superintendent of Ramsey Public Schools.  He asked the Village Council to consider the issues that were brought before them, as a Superintendent for the past ten years, mental health is the number one issue facing all of us, our schools, and our young people, so the need for housing is growing and he would like everyone to consider that.  He thanked the Bolger family for their contribution.   He added that Ridgewood is a special place that accepts everyone, and whatever it can do to encourage more housing for special needs, should be considered.

 

There were no additional comments from the public.

 

Mayor Hache stated that regarding the Adopt a Tree ordinance there is no specification to the fact that it is in the right of way, this was just the introduction tonight so there is still an opportunity to tweak it.  He added that regarding the regulations for the Adopt a Tree program, that was more of a function of how to get the message out, not to include in the wording.  Councilman Sedon added that the application for Adopt a Tree is on the Shade Tree Commissions webpage on the Village website, which spells out all requirements for the program along with a list of the tree species.  He added that the mechanism already exists, and the ordinance was just setting the prices for the trees for the memorial/celebration trees.

 

6.           VILLAGE MANAGER’S REPORT

 

Ms. Mailander stated that Annual Parking Permits would be available for sale on Monday, December 17th at 8:30 A.M. at the reception desk in Village Hall.  The lottery for the Hudson Street parking permits resulted in 42 residents being allocated a Hudson lot parking permit, therefore, 13 additional Hudson Street permits will be available on a first come first served basis.  All applicants for parking permits must bring their license and registration, or a photo copy of them, with their application. 

 

Ms. Mailander reminded everyone that the Village is offering free parking in the Central Business District parking lots and at the train station parking lots on December 15th and 22nd.  She encouraged everyone to come for great shopping and free parking in the parking lots. 

 

Regarding leaf pickup, Ms. Mailander stated that the final pickup in Area A has been completed, and tomorrow would be the final pickup in Area C.  The contractor will be doing the final pickup in Area B, and the final pickup in Area D will be early next week.  Areas that require the use of the leaf vac will also be addressed within the next week.  As a reminder, leaves can be placed in biodegradable paper bags and put between the curb and sidewalk.  Once the leaves are in bags, the Streets Department should be called to pick them up.  The pickup of the bagged leaves will continue through the end of January.  Leaves can also be brought to the recycling center for disposal, but leaves may not be placed in plastic bags.

 

Ms. Mailander stated that there was a question last week from Councilman Voigt about the revenues from Graydon Pool.  In looking at the revenues vs. expenses from 2009 to 2016, although the revenues are higher than the expenses, this doesn’t take into account the indirect expenses from all of the different Departments that assist at Graydon Pool and in addition it doesn’t  include any capital improvements or debt service on Graydon capital improvements.  Once these other expenses are taken into account, there is some subsidizing from Village taxpayers.  She added that as Ms. Loving had stated at a previous meeting, all Village parks get subsidized from the taxpayers, which is true.

 

Ms. Mailander stated that for the update about the leaf vacuum, Mr. Rogers was going to report.  Mr. Rogers stated that after the public comment section at last week’s meeting brought up an issue about a $250,000 payment for a leaf vacuum that isn’t working, he contacted the Engineer on Thursday morning and also Rich Calbi, who is the Director of Operations.  Mr. Rogers explained that several years ago, the Village purchased a $250,000 truck which remains in operation on a daily basis through the present day, and a leaf vacuum attachment to the truck that cost $65,000.  Mr. Rogers stated that the leaf vacuum actually attaches to that truck but the truck itself has other uses and is used in leaf pickups, snow removal, and other things by the Street Department.  The truck has operated properly since day one.  The $65,000 leaf vacuum attachment has had trouble operating, has been in maintenance, and has had a very limited timeframe where it has been working.  He added that he has been working with the staff to see what legal remedies the Village may have with regard to the $65,000 leaf vacuum attachment, and any other expenses that it had to pay for purposes of maintenance and care for that particular item.

 

Ms. Mailander stated that Santa will be in his house at Memorial Park at Van Neste Square on December 15th from 12:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M., and December 22nd from 12:00 P.M. to 2:00 P.M.

 

Ms. Mailander stated that all Village Offices will be closed on December 24th and 25th in observance of the Christmas Holiday.  The offices will be open all day on December 31st and then closed on January 1st in observance of the New Year’s Holiday.

 

7.           VILLAGE COUNCIL REPORTS

 

Chamber of Commerce – Councilwoman Walsh stated that the Chamber of Commerce met this morning.  Restaurant Week is going to be three weeks in January, the price for a meal is going to be $30.19.  She encouraged everyone to participate.  The Chamber also welcomed four new members, and they talked a bit about parking.  They wanted to remind the Village Council that the enforcement of parking in the CBD is probably the most important thing and the Parking Enforcement Officers need to make sure that they divide and conquer, to cover the entire area to address repeat parking.  Councilwoman Walsh stated that they wanted to get more clarification on the Hudson Street lottery and why individuals would choose that over trying to find parking at the train station or just buying the resident pass and doing Parkmobile. 

 

Mayor Hache asked if there was any discussion about the stores being closed for ‘Downtown for the Holidays.’  Councilwoman Walsh stated that there was, which led to a bigger conversation that each landlord and each tenant have agreements, so it is up to the tenant to decide what their hours of operation are.  Their concern is that each individual store is going to stay open if it is profitable, but if they don’t think it is profitable, they won’t stay open during Downtown for the Holidays.  They will continue the conversation among their members but its up to each individual store owner to decide whether or not they wish to remain open.

 

Orpheus Club – Mayor Hache stated that last Saturday evening, he attended a concert by the Orpheus Club Chorus at the Ridgewood United Methodist Church, with a special guest performance by soprano singer Kristen Plumley.  He added that it was an unbelievable show. The Church is celebrating 100 years in 2019.

 

Library Board – Councilwoman Walsh said that the Library Board met last night and they were still working on the renovation project, and would be coming before the Village Council in January to talk about their Capital Campaign and their Public Awareness Campaign.  She added that they also wanted to talk about what it would cost per household if they do go through with the project, but would also work within the community so that people know what the project is all about.

 

Central Business District Advisory Committee Mayor Hache stated that the Central Business District Advisory Committee would be meeting tomorrow morning to recap 2018 and look forward to 2019. 

 

8.           RESOLUTIONS – RIDGEWOOD WATER

 

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 18-354 THROUGH 18-360, WERE ADOPTED BY A CONSENT AGENDA WITH ONE VOTE BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, AND WERE READ BY TITLE ONLY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.           ORDINANCES

 

  1. INTRODUCTION - #3694 – Amend Chapter 145 Fees – Adopt a Tree and Memorial Benches

 

Mayor Hache moved the first reading of ordinance 3694.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she was voting yes, but wanted to make sure that there was proper clarification within the ordinance.  Mr. Rogers stated that they would ensure that the ordinance offers proper clarification on what section of the code is being amended, so that it is known that this is for tree planting on public property.

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3694 by title:

 

AN ORDINANACE TO AMEND CHAPTER 145, FEES OF THE VILLAGE CODE – PARKS AND RECREATION – PARKS/SHADE TREE DIVISION

           

Councilwoman Knudsen moved that ordinance 3694 be adopted on first reading and that January 16, 2019 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion. 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. INTRODUCTION - #3695 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Establish Regulations for Temporary Storage Containers

 

Mayor Hache moved the first reading of ordinance 3695.  Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3695 by title:

 

AN ORDINANACE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD AMENDING THE PROVISIONS IN CHAPTER 190, LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT, CONCERING PORTABLE STORAGE CONTAINERS

           

Councilman Voigt moved that ordinance 3695 be adopted on first reading and that January 16, 2019 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon.  Councilman Sedon seconded the motion. 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. INTRODUCTION - #3696 – Amend Chapter 145 – Fees – Fees for Temporary Storage Containers

 

Mayor Hache moved the first reading of ordinance 3696.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3696 by title:

 

AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD AMENDING THE PROVISIONS IN CHAPTER 145, FEES, FOR PORTABLE STORAGE CONTAINERS

           

Councilwoman Knudsen moved that ordinance 3696 be adopted on first reading and that January 16, 2019 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion. 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

 

  1. INTRODUCTION - #3697 – Amend Chapter 145 – Fees – Graydon Pool Membership Fees

 

Mayor Hache moved the first reading of ordinance 3697.  Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3697 by title:

 

AN ORDINANACE TO AMEND CHAPTER 145, FEES OF THE VILLAGE CODE FOR GRAYDON POOL MEMBERSHIP FEES

           

Councilman Sedon moved that ordinance 3697 be adopted on first reading and that January 16, 2019 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon.  Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion. 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3687 – Amend Chapter 145 – Fees – Day Camp Fees

 

Mayor Hache moved the reading of ordinance 3687 by title on second reading and that the Public Hearing thereon be opened.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3687 by title:

 

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 145, FEES OF THE VILLAGE CODE FOR DAY CAMP FEES

 

Mayor Hache announced that the Public Hearing was open.  There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Hache moved that the Public Hearing was closed.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion. 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

Councilman Voigt moved that ordinance 3687 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3688 – Amend Chapter 145 – Fees – Graydon Pool Membership Fees and Tennis Membership Fees

 

Mayor Hache moved the reading of ordinance 3688 by title on second reading and that the Public Hearing thereon be opened.  Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3688 by title:

 

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 145, FEES OF THE VILLAGE CODE FOR GRAYDON POOL MEMBERSHIP FEES AND TENNIS MEMBERSHIP FEES

 

Mayor Hache announced that the Public Hearing was open. 

 

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that he believed they had discussed the Non-Resident Member Guest Pass last week and there was some confusion with whether it referred to a resident bringing a non-resident guest or a non-resident member bringing a guest.  He added that he spoke to Councilwoman Knudsen today, and he believes that the wording was resolved so where it says Non-Resident Guest Sponsored, it is if you are a Non- Resident Member and you are bringing a guest.  Ms. Mailander stated that was correct.  Mr. Loving stated that the question remains that if you were a Non-Resident member and you have paid a premium for that membership above and beyond what you would pay if you were a Resident, why there is a charge to bring a guest that exceeds the charge for a Resident to bring a guest.  Mr. Loving stated, it should be a $15 fee for a guest regardless of membership type.  He added that he hoped Ms. Bigos had some numbers regarding how many Non-Resident Members brought guests last year, to see whether the extra revenue brought in will justify antagonizing non-resident members.

 

Marcia Ringel, 250 Ferris Place, stated that if the discounted guest coupon books expire in 2020, as the weeks go by, there would be less time to use the coupons and that would inhibit the motivation to buy them at all.  Historically, these coupon books never expired.  She stated that it had been mentioned that the coupon books would have to be bought at the same time as the membership badge was purchased, which she hoped would not be the case.  Ms. Ringel stated that there was concern that people that do not have a badge for the season may want to buy a discounted coupon book, which may become an enforcement issue.

 

Ms. Ringel added that in making a different price for guests of Non-Resident badge holders, how realistic is it that the kids in the office are going to demand proof of residency by somebody’s guest.  She asked if it was only the people who are scrupulous about following and understanding the rules, suggesting that it was being set up for failure and discrimination against the people who don’t understand all the rules.  She agrees that $20 seems punitive, as Mr. Loving previously stated.

 

Ms. Ringel added that it isn’t clear if there was any sort of reimbursement if the lightening detection system goes off or it starts to rain.  Ms. Ringel stated that as the price goes up people will be more interested into whether they can get their money back or not.  She added that it was great they were re-introducing the coupon books, but by buying eleven coupons for the price of ten coupons gives a smaller proportionate discount than when you bought ten coupons for the price of nine coupons.  She felt that they way the books were set up originally, where you had to write the name, age, address, and phone number of every guest on the coupon, was desirable, from a safety perspective.

 

There were no additional comments from the public, and Mayor Hache moved that the Public Hearing was closed.  Councilman Sedon seconded the motion. 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

Councilwoman Knudsen asked whether Ms. Bigos had any data regarding what that $5 added fee to the Non-Resident guest pass equated to, as Councilman Voigt had asked last week.  Mr. Rogers stated that the Public Comment was closed and would need to be reopened.

 

There was a motion by Mayor Hache to reopen public comment, which was seconded by Councilman Sedon.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

Ms. Bigos stated that she was not able to gather that information, but they did sell more than 8,000 guest passes last year, so the majority of their sales are on a daily basis.  She stated that she would need a staff member to go into CommunityPass and run a report on that, but unfortunately that employee was on vacation this past week.  Councilman Knudsen stated that presumably if they were to have a coupon book available for purchase by Resident seasonal members where information was gathered on a day pass, then if a Non-Resident seasonal passholder brings a guest, there should be information gathered on that day pass as well.  Ms. Bigos stated that the gathering of guest information is always done.  All seasonal members and all guests must complete a daily guest application for emergency purposes that includes their name, address, any medical conditions that are existing, and an emergency cell phone number.  Councilwoman Knudsen asked if they could distinguish which member invited the guest.  Ms. Bigos stated that information could be asked but she wasn’t sure if they would get an honest answer from the resident or the applicant filling out that form.  Councilwoman Knudsen added that if its not an honest answer, then how do they know if someone is paying the $15 or $20. 

 

Ms. Bigos stated that all guests must show proof of residency otherwise they are not permitted.  Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the coupon books are only sold to Resident season passholders.  Ms. Mailander stated that Ms. Ringel mentioned that on the coupon books they used to require personal information.  Ms. Bigos stated they could do that.  Councilwoman Knudsen stated that they would like to gather how many guests are brought in by Non-Resident season passholders, so if someone from Ho-Ho-Kus was to bring a guest that was also from Ho-Ho-Kus, how will they collect that data.  Ms. Bigos stated that there is information collected on the guest pass.  Councilwoman Knudsen asked if that information can be gathered.  Ms. Bigos stated that they can, but it was not possible to run the report this week.  Ms. Mailander stated that the fees are until 2020. 

 

Councilwoman Knudsen asked why if Councilman Voigt asked this question a week ago, the report wasn’t run, and it seems it is because an employee is on vacation.  Ms. Mailander stated that the hearing could be continued to January.  Mayor Hache stated that with the expiration dates, they get the money today and if someone chooses to use it this year or next, they have two years of use for the money and he doesn’t agree with having an expiration date on the coupon book.  Ms. Mailander stated that if a new Village Council comes in and decides not to have coupon books then people may have books that are useless.  Ms. Bigos stated that she could implement whatever decision the Village Council makes. 

 

Councilwoman Walsh added that with the coupon books, she was a big user of them, and either you use them all or they sit and don’t get used.  She stated that they have to have some sort of administrative process that they aren’t out there forever, and the two years where you’re paying for ten passes the likelihood is they will be used.  Mayor Hache stated that the rolling two years make sense in fairness.  Councilwoman Knudsen stated that administratively, it is a good idea to have a cap.

 

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that she does not think that coupons that somebody has paid for should expire, even after two years, because if you paid for them, you paid for them.  She added that a coupon that is given out on a flyer could have an expiration, but if she buys them and doesn’t use them, she would want cash redemption.  She added that she thought it was wrong to put an expiration on something for which a citizen is paying cash.  She regularly brings guests to the pool and her grandchildren are Non-Resident members and frequently have guests that come, and she always fills out the paperwork that is required, which is basically their name.  She has never been asked for name, address, medical conditions as Ms. Bigos has stated.  Ms. Loving added that it was recently mentioned how day pass people don’t know all the rules and regulations the way members know them, but day pass people all have to take the deep water test as the guards are very diligent about that.

 

Ms. Mailander stated that she didn’t want to create an expectation that these coupons are going to last forever and in 2021 or 2023 a new Village Council is in office and decides they are not going to honor coupon books anymore.  In this case, someone has paid for the coupons and are thinking they can be used forever, and it may not be the case. 

 

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that when you purchase a gift certificate in a store, some stores put an expiration date on the gift certificate, but a number of years ago she thought it was determined that you couldn’t put an expiration date because somebody paid for that certificate.  She thought there was a lawsuit that decided that there couldn’t be an expiration date put on things for which payment had previously been made.  Mr. Rogers stated that he imagined that somebody probably challenged that, but he did not know the outcome.  He added that it is a perception and a matter of the way that it is looked at, buying so many coupons or two years’ worth of passes.

 

Mayor Hache stated that they would continue the Public Hearing to January, but asked if they could set it so that in the future there is a public announcement that any outstanding coupon books have until a particular date to use them.  Mr. Rogers stated he would find out.  Councilwoman Knudsen stated that in fairness, they could monitor how many coupon books are sold as 8,000 day passes is a big number that she did not anticipate, so she might have a different take depending on how many books are actually sold.

 

Councilwoman Knudsen made a motion to continue the Public Hearing on Ordinance 3688 to January 16, 2019.  Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

 

 

 

 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3689 – Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Stop Signs at Claremont Road and Cantrell Road

 

Mayor Hache moved the reading of ordinance 3689 by title on second reading and that the Public Hearing thereon be opened.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:             None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3689 by title:

 

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-59, SCHEDULE IX “STOP INTERSECTIONS”

 

Mayor Hache announced that the Public Hearing was open. 

 

Marcia Ringel, 250 Ferris Place, stated that she lives very close to the intersection of Claremont and Cantrell, and when she realized that the new signs would be North/South and not East/West, she realized that it wasn’t going to be having to stop at every single block on Cantrell.  She asked that when new traffic control signs are being proposed, if there could be some sort of mechanism to inform people who live immediately around it, so people in the neighborhood won’t have to wake up to a new stop sign on their surrounding streets.  She added that in an area where there are already quite a few stop signs in a residential neighborhood, people might want to know about adding another stop sign.

 

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that when the Village Council approved the small nodes, they notified people in the areas where they were changed, and asked if they had notified people in the area of proposed stop signs.  She recollected that in the past, there had been a problem with the placement of a new stop sign that people were emailing about.  Ms. Mailander stated that the placement of new stop signs is done either through observation of our first responders or because the Village Engineer determines it is necessary for safety reasons.  For the Village to do a 200 foot notification for every stop sign would be time consuming and expensive, but if the Village Council wishes, it can be done.  She added that it is usually a safety issue, and in such a case they would still place the stop sign, even if the surrounding neighbors were not in favor of it. 

Mayor Hache moved the Public Hearing be closed.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

Councilwoman Knudsen moved that ordinance 3689 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3690 – Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Stop Signs at Fairmount Road and Upper Boulevard

 

Mayor Hache moved the reading of ordinance 3690 by title on second reading and that the Public Hearing thereon be opened.  Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3690 by title:

 

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-59, SCHEDULE IX “STOP INTERSECTIONS”

 

Mayor Hache announced that the Public Hearing was open.  There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Hache moved that the Public Hearing was closed.  Councilman Voigt seconded the motion. 

 

 

 

 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

Councilwoman Knudsen moved that ordinance 3690 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law.  Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3691 – Amend Chapter 190 – Land Use and Development – Zoning in B-1 and B-2 Business Districts

 

Mayor Hache moved the reading of ordinance 3691 by title on second reading and that the Public Hearing thereon be opened.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3691 by title:

 

              AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD AMENDING THE PROVISIONS IN CHAPTER 190, LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT, CONCERNING THE PERMITTED USES IN THE B-1 AND B-2 BUSINESS DISTRICTS

 

Mayor Hache announced that the Public Hearing was open.  There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Hache moved that the Public Hearing was closed.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion. 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

Councilman Sedon moved that ordinance 3691 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law.  Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3692 – Establish Licensing for Barbershops, Hairdressing, Cosmetology, and Nail Salons

 

Mayor Hache moved the reading of ordinance 3692 by title on second reading and that the Public Hearing thereon be opened.  Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3692 by title:

 

            AN ORDINANCE TO CREATE A NEW CHAPTER OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD ENTITLED “COSMETOLOGY” TO ADDRESS HEALTH AND SAFETY RELATED ISSUES

 

Mayor Hache announced that the Public Hearing was open.  There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Hache moved that the Public Hearing was closed.  Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion. 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

Councilman Voigt moved that ordinance 3692 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law.  Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

 

 

 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

  1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3693 – Amend Chapter 145 – Fees – Fees for Licenses for Barbershops, Hairdressing, Cosmetology and Nail Salons

 

Mayor Hache moved the reading of ordinance 3693 by title on second reading and that the Public Hearing thereon be opened.  Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

The Village Clerk read ordinance 3693 by title:

 

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 145-4 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD ENTITLED “DEPARTMENTAL FEES” TO AMEND THE FEES CHARGED BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT

 

Mayor Hache announced that the Public Hearing was open.  There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Hache moved that the Public Hearing was closed.  Councilman Sedon seconded the motion. 

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

 

Councilwoman Walsh moved that ordinance 3693 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law.  Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

 

Roll Call Vote

 

AYES:             Councilmembers Knudsen, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Hache

NAYS:            None

ABSENT:       None

ABSTAIN:      None

10.         RESOLUTIONS

 

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 18-361 THROUGH 18-384, WERE ADOPTED BY A CONSENT AGENDA WITH ONE VOTE BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, AND WERE READ BY TITLE ONLY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 18-385 THROUGH 18-388, WERE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY AND READ IN FULL:

 

Prior to the vote on these resolutions, Councilman Voigt stated that one of the issues he has with Resolution 18-385 relates to the Valley Hospital Redevelopment Plan, which is an overlay plan requiring the Village to redevelop 35 to 45 family units if and when the hospital leaves their present site.  Beth McManus, Village Affordable Housing Planner, stated that the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement gives the Village two options.  The first is to adopt a Redevelopment Plan that calls for 35 to 45 units, and the Redevelopment Plan can create those units in any way that the Village sees fit, through zoning for inclusionary housing with those 35 to 45 as a set aside, or the Village could do something different where perhaps there was 100% affordable housing in addition to other uses, that might have a less direct relationship to the creation of that affordable housing.

 

Councilman Voigt stated that if they were to develop 35 to 45 affordable housing units, it may devalue properties in that area and he doesn’t know if the people in that area have been made aware of this.  It would be helpful if the Village were to alert the residents in that area so they can make some comments on the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement.  He said there is time to do this, as it is not an urgent matter.  Ms. McManus stated that it really is an urgent matter, because the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement that Fair Share Housing has put forth to the Village is contingent upon the Village acting quickly, before the end of the year.  She doesn’t know if Fair Share would try to change the terms, but they would definitely take the opportunity to consider whether or not they wanted to change the terms of the agreement, including housing obligations.  Councilman Voigt interjected that he was uncomfortable.  Ms. McManus added that she had a couple more points to make.

 

Ms. McManus stated that she doesn’t think the nearby residents have been noticed, but the concern that the creation of the affordable housing on the Valley Hospital site will lower the values of the surrounding homes, isn’t necessarily accurate.  A poorly planned project would have a negative impact, but if it is a well-planned project that includes 35 to 45 units, there isn’t any indication in the data that the development would lead to a reduction in property values.  This is especially because this is a site that would be going from a very busy hospital, with significant impact to the surrounding uses, to something with a less intensive use.  Councilman Voigt asked whether she had data on affordable housing units, being placed on 15 acres surrounded by some well valued homes, maintaining their value over time.  He said if he was living in that area and knew this was going to happen, he would have some concerns and would like to know more about what this means.  Ms. McManus stated that she could share some studies that have been done on the impact on property values with affordable housing.  They largely focus on larger low income housing tax credit projects which are typically between 50 and 90 units in size, and there are instances where those projects can have a negative impact on property values, but they usually have to do with poor planning and external conditions.

 

Ms. McManus spoke about Councilman Voigt’s point about notice and getting folks involved in the process so that they understand the impacts.  She shares his concerns for any site addressed in the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, especially for the future use of the Valley Hospital property, because the process for that site was carved out differently than other aspects of the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement.  She added that since Valley Hospital represents a redevelopment opportunity, they were able to negotiate on behalf of the Village a much larger timeframe.  All of the ordinances pertaining to changes to the downtown or affordable housing administration ordinances, would be required to be adopted within the next six months, based on when the Village’s Fairness Hearing is held.  In the case of the Valley Hospital property, the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement allows for an 18 month window from the Fairness Hearing, in order to implement the site. This was done specifically because there was an anticipation of establishing this site as a Redevelopment Zone, which requires a longer legal process.  During the 18 months, it creates an opportunity for public input and public notice.  If the Village is so inclined, it has the opportunity to do a public process where the surrounding residents are invited in, to help address some of the concerns that they may have.

 

Councilman Voigt stated that if the Village gets the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement approved by the State Superior Court and it is etched in stone, and the development of the Valley Hospital property goes before the Planning Board, they will not be able to change the requirements.  Ms. McManus stated that was the nature of the settlement. 

 

Councilman Voigt stated that he was uncomfortable unless he understands what that means, and the Village Council gets some input from residents around the Valley Hospital site.  Councilman Voigt wants to ensure that the surrounding neighbors know about the future plans for the Valley Hospital site.

 

Councilman Voigt added that his other concern is regarding Mr. Wells’ letter, where it mentions that the hearing transcript shows that he had testified numerous times and commented at virtually every Planning Board meeting, making sure that special needs housing was included.  Councilman Voigt stated that he was on the Planning Board during some of it and he would like be able to see those transcripts to make sure that he understands that this had been voiced numerous times and he gets an opportunity to show that.

 

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the Village has retained a Special Attorney on the matter of special needs housing and Chestnut Village, which is the appropriate route.  Her recollection regarding Chestnut Village and special needs is that there was a comment earlier that it would benefit the community to have a special needs group home on Chestnut Street; however, she believes one already exists there.  Ms. McManus stated that was her understanding.  Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she was a member of the Planning Board at that time, and the Resolution of Approval for Chestnut Village is reflective of what was decided upon by the Planning Board and she was very comfortable moving forward with this. 

 

Councilwoman Knudsen asked about the idea of affordable housing being a negative, but just so everyone understands, the income threshold for affordable housing at its highest level is representative of many members of the Village’s present community.  Ms. McManus stated that it was approximately $85,000 for a family of four.  Councilwoman Knudsen stated that $85,000 is representative of teachers, law enforcement, service people, and an important point is that the Village’s stock of affordable homes has been depleted by way of expansion on many of the starter homes that existed, and she didn’t think that affordable housing was something people should fear.  This Redevelopment Zone opportunity at the Valley Hospital site was an opportunity to redefine the future.

Councilwoman Knudsen added that her understanding is if they did not adopt the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, Fair Share Housing simply comes back and has another bite at the apple.  Mr. Rogers stated that the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement speaks to this, that if they don’t adopt it within a particular timeframe, then it goes right back to the inventory and it would be left in the hands of the developer, within the density parameters decided.  Councilwoman Knudsen stated that there is a mechanism in place that allows for public input, and they can gauge the residents’ feelings towards any future redevelopment zone.  If in fact, the Planning Board or the governing body makes a determination that the public is not interested in it, they then have the option not to proceed.  She added that they would have an incredible public outreach and public input.

 

Councilman Voigt stated that he appreciated that, but Ms. McManus said to him something that concerns him, which is once the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement is adopted and approved by the Court, it is etched in stone.  At that time, the public’s input is not going to matter and they owe the public the opportunity to provide input on the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement before it is etched in stone.  He added that he was not comfortable in moving forward with this, as they owe the public the opportunity to weigh in on this now, before it is sent down to Trenton and it gets approved by the Court and then they have no chance to make any kind of impact on the development of the Valley Hospital site at all.

 

Mr. Rogers asked Ms. McManus what type of involvement can the public have in the design issues that would be raised in the redevelopment process.  Ms. McManus stated that the public can be involved in the location of the housing in terms of property and what buffers are applied; the design of the site; the housing type; how they are oriented to surrounding homes; and the design or architecture of the homes in the development.  If the Village decides to utilize the redevelopment route, the Village would have more controls on the property and be able to dictate specifics.  Mr. Rogers stated that the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement goes to the Superior Court, unless somebody appeals it, in which case it goes to the Appellate Division.  Mr. Rogers asked if Valley Hospital differs from the other locations as far as the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement.  Ms. McManus replied that the present Valley Hospital site is the only part of the Village’s Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement that allows for the 18 month process, and it is also the only component where instead of using the density of the site to determine the number of units, it simply states that 35 to 45 affordable units must be created.  This allows the Village to create other types of uses, in addition to the  35 to 45 units.  This additional flexibility is particular to this component, and is unique to Ridgewood as well.

 

Councilman Sedon stated that this is the end of a long process, and asked Ms. McManus from the Fair Share Housing standpoint, what their next action would be.  Ms. McManus stated that if no action is taken by the Village on the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, she would fully expect that Fair Share Housing will introduce litigation to bring the Village back in before the judge and at that point the court would order the Village to go ahead and implement the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement and perhaps give an opportunity to Fair Share Housing to change some of the terms of the Agreement.  She added that if the Village it is proven that the Village is unable or unwilling to enact the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, the court would put a Special Master in place who would be tasked with overseeing all of the developments in the Village.  The Special Master would ensure that all of the affordable housing was implemented properly and also might take advantage of any other opportunities that may arise.  It has the effect at the municipal level of taking a lot of power from the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Adjustment and puts that power into the hands of the Special Master.

 

Councilman Voigt asked if the Village would be allowed a month or two to look at the Affordable Housing Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement.  He added that his concern is that it hasn’t been well-disseminated to the public, especially in locations where it may affect them.  Ms. McManus stated that she can’t fully anticipate Fair Share Housing’s reaction to the Village not moving forward with the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, but the terms were contingent upon the Village authorizing execution of the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement not later than this evening.  Mr. Rogers stated that the Village Council has had over two months to look at the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement; however, he added that Councilman Voigt had a point with respect to the Valley Hospital portion of the Agreement, as that was discussed in Closed Session, with the new wording found only in the most recent version.  Councilman Voigt stated that he has had nine days to look at this, which he thinks is unfair.  Mr. Rogers replied that he wouldn’t say it was unfair, and it has been spoken about in Closed Session many times.  Regarding the numbers and what is proposed for the Valley Hospital site, that part of the Agreement occurred in November, after the last mediation was held.  Mr. Rogers advised the Village Council about it and stated that they were waiting for Fair Share Housing to come up with their version of the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, which was received by the Village on December 3, 2018.

 

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that some of the discussions in the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement were previously discussed at the Planning Board, specifically Racetrack Road where they had Public Hearings on those as an overlay zone and they worked on buffers in 2015.  They worked very hard to insulate the area from any negative impact by adding significant buffers, lots of treed areas, lots of protections in densities, that everyone was comfortable with, and there were many members of the public that came to those hearings and were quite pleased.  She added that in the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, it is important that they maintained a considerably lower density across the board, which is in stark contrast to the approvals that were granted back in June 2015.  This is a considerably more thoughtful process and Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, and it is prudent to execute this Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement because she is comfortable with the 18 month Redevelopment Process.  Councilwoman Knudsen noted that the Enclave Special Needs project is progressing and fulfilling a need in the community and beyond.  She added that the benefit in this Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement is significant and that they should move forward with it. 

 

Mr. Rogers stated that if the Village Council feels this was unfairly presented to them, then he said they should not vote on it tonight.  Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she felt they had a lot of Closed Session discussions about the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement. 

 

Councilwoman Walsh asked if Ms. McManus could describe the types of affordable housing units that are proposed to be built.  Ms. McManus stated that municipalities have three types of obligations: the Rehabilitation Program, the Prior Round Obligation, and the Third Round Obligation.  The Village is affected by the last two obligations.  Within the 55 units that were negotiated, the Village has to meet that obligation but there are also subcomponents of the obligation that need to be met, as follows:  25% of the RDP must be rental housing, with no more than 25% senior housing.  Additionally, 50% of the RDP must be family housing, which is any unit not restricted to senior housing or special needs, and then 50% of the rental obligation must be family housing. She added that there are income and bedroom distributions as well.  Councilwoman Walsh stated that was what she was trying to clarify was the total obligation, because there are so many different sites being built with affordable housing in the Village and she wanted to get a clarification of what is going to be where and how it is going to be laid out.  Ms. McManus stated that municipalities are eligible for 25 bonus credits if their obligations are met in certain ways, so the Village’s Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement maximized the bonus credits, senior housing, and non-family housing while still meeting all of the other requirements.  This is done to make sure that the affordable housing stock serves a variety of different types of households.

 

Councilwoman Walsh posed a hypothetical situation about a large house that wanted to convert into an affordable housing house, and asked if that would that be permitted.  Ms. McManus stated potentially it may be permitted since there are a number of affordable housing zones, which provide for different types of housing, as long as specific requirements are met.  She added that if a new site came up that was not in one of the affordable housing zones, with a 20% set aside offsite, which could be permitted as long as the details were worked out with the Planning Board or Zoning Board of Adjustment to ensure that those units were eligible for credit.  It just takes extra effort and details to make sure that the projects align and the Village gets affordable housing credit for affordable housing units.

 

Councilwoman Walsh stated that there were a couple of other vacant sites, but if applications were made for housing they would fall under this as well.  Ms. McManus stated that one of the components of the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement is the mandatory set aside ordinance which covers if the Planning Board or Zoning Board of Adjustment has an application or the Village Council has a request for a re-zoning or redevelopment plan, and it is approved, an affordable housing set aside must be made.  The developer would work out those details before the approving board to find a unique solution to the affordable housing obligation.

 

Mayor Hache stated that it was very clear that there are many different points of view regarding this issue, and he believes that it allows the Village to preserve the character of its Central Business District and maintain its density.  He added that it gives more discretion in redeveloping the Valley Hospital site, and if the Valley Hospital site was put back into the inventory, he was sure that the density would be much higher.

 

Councilwoman Knudsen thanked Ms. McManus for being at this meeting and for all of her hard work on this, as well as Mr. Rogers who worked diligently on the terms of the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement.

 

 

 

 

 

Regarding Resolution 18-387, Councilman Voigt stated that he was concerned about the mature trees that would be cut down, reducing the open space, and the amount of additional profits that would be generated by the parking spaces.

 

Regarding Resolution 18-387, Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she hears what Councilman Voigt is saying and they have gone through exhaustive measures to determine that the existing trees to be taken down are dying and they have to rely on the Village professionals who made that determination.  She added that talking about adding parking spaces for $290,000 in contrast to the cost of a garage, it is remarkable that for $7,600 per space, they are going to be able to create 36 additional parking spaces which makes a tremendous amount of sense, from an economic perspective.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regarding Resolution 18-388, Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the importance of having a ramp for the elderly and disabled is essential, so that as the project of the restoration and rehabilitation of the Zabriskie-Schedler house moves forward, everyone has access to utilize the property.

 

Councilman Voigt stated that he was in favor of preserving history, but he was concerned that this is on the backs of the Village taxpayers.  Councilman Voigt stated there has been no concrete plan as to how the Village is going to pay for the development of the Schedler Park property and the restoration/rehabilitation of the Zabriskie-Schedler House other than through taxpayer dollars.  He added that with a public/private partnership he would be more in favor of the project, but that partnership does not exist.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

 

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that during the Manager’s Report this evening, she gave a report regarding the number of people that signed up for the lottery in the Hudson Street lot, with 13 spots available for sale, however, it was not clarified if those 42 that signed up would be eligible for the Lyft service.  He asked if the 13 people who would purchase the available passes would be eligible for Lyft as well.  He added that related to that, there is an ordinance in place concerning the purchase of the parking passes and what those get you.  He asked if the ordinance was legally required to be changed as a result of providing this service.

 

Mr. Loving thanked the Village Council for continuing the hearing with respect to the Graydon Pool membership fees.  In his mind, it remains a question of the number of day passes that are purchased by Non-Resident members.  Mr. Loving also thanked Mr. Rogers for following up on his concerns regarding the leaf vacuum attachment and the truck that is currently operable.  Mr. Loving added that the leaf vacuum attachment cannot be taken for service unless it is on the truck, so any time the leaf vacuum attachment is in the shop, the truck is tied up as well.  Mr. Rogers stated that he didn’t know if that was true but he would confirm that.  Mr. Loving stated that with respect to monies that were spent, he would like an investigation into additional personnel that were put into leaf collection work, to sweep the street, as a result of this leaf vacuum attachment being in for repair.

 

Marcia Ringel, 250 Ferris Place, stated that regarding notifying people about stop signs, she appreciated the Village Manager’s point that if a decision has been made to place a traffic control sign on the basis of safety, but wondered if a notification could still be made to surrounding residents so they would be aware of a new sign being installed. 

 

Ms. Ringel spoke about the approval of next year’s Village Council meeting dates, and noted that as of yesterday, she couldn’t find any of the 2019 meeting dates on the Village website.  Ms. Ringel pointed out that the website says 2017 on the bottom of the page as the copyright date.  She added that it would be helpful if all of the 2019 meeting dates could be published on the relevant webpages.

 

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that regarding Resolution 18-384 for the renovation of the Graydon Pool bathrooms, she wanted to clarify that this $27,350 wasn’t anything to do with repairing the bathrooms but was just for design and preparing documents for bidding the work out.  She found it shocking that so much money has to be spent before the first tile is chipped off. 

 

Ms. Loving added that regarding the discussion about the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, she is so grateful that it was adopted tonight.  She added that anybody who bought a house next to a hospital would know that it is a 24 hour a day operation, and is really noisy and busy.  If 35 family homes are built at that site, the residents of those homes are probably at school and work, during the day, which tends to be quieter.  She can’t imagine how housing values would go down, if the site went from a 24 hour a day operation to a 35 family home site.  Ms. Loving added that it was her opinion that the rejection smacked of intolerance towards people with a lower income.

 

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that the reason they have hired Connolly Hickey for the renovation of the Graydon Pool bathrooms was to pursue the historic determination.  Ms. Mailander added that it was also for them to prepare the bid documents so that the bathrooms are renovated in keeping with an historic structure.

 

There were no additional public comments.

 

Mayor Hache asked if Ms. Mailander would comment regarding the parking permits and the 13 Hudson Street parking permits, which are available.  Ms. Mailander stated that they had planned on 55 Hudson Street parking permits, and the reason they held a lottery for these parking permits was because they thought there may be more than 55 residents who would want to use that service, and the fair way to allocate the Hudson Street parking permits was through a lottery.  She added that her thought was as people come to buy their 2019 Ridgewood Parking Permits, Hudson Street could be offered to them with the rideshare availability.  Mayor Hache stated that if you were buying a premium resident parking pass, it is going to cost you the same as Hudson Street.  If you are one of the 13 people who didn’t participate in the lottery, you are going to take your chances of finding parking in any of the premium lots.  Whereas, if you hold the tag specific to Hudson you will have a guaranteed spot until construction starts.  Ms. Mailander asked if the Village Council was agreeable to having the 13 spots available for purchase, and residents could choose a premium parking permit which allows parking in any lot except the Hudson Street lot or a parking permit that was just for the Hudson Street lot and gives them the rideshare capability.  Mayor Hache stated that this will gave some residents more time to process the parking permit options.  Ms. Mailander stated that the first 13 that come in and say they want to purchase a Hudson Street parking permit will be accommodated and they will also participate the ride share service once the Hudson parking lot is closed for construction of the parking garage.  She added that the overall premium spots have been reduced to 155.  Councilman Sedon stated that if all the Premium Parking Permits are sold out, then the only choice, close to the train station, would be for them to purchase the Hudson Street parking permits with the ride share service.

 

Mr. Rogers stated that regarding the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement, the Village had argued that the time period or the remoteness of Valley Hospital moving from that site would have warranted the inclusion of the zoning for Valley Hospital use, after Valley leaves at some point in the future, at the next round.  The court and the Special Master indicated it should be in this round, so it came about near the end of the settlement negotiations, which is why it wasn’t in the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement until the last version.  He added that Councilman Voigt’s concern with making sure that people in the area are aware of what is going on, is based on the last version.  The Village’s ability to determine some of the design characteristics of the 35 to 45 family housing development at the Valley Hospital site provides the opportunity for the people in that area to get involved in the process.  Mr. Rogers added that development on the Valley Hospital site was going into the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement one way or another, whether the Village went to trial or added it themselves.

 

Councilwoman Knudsen added that while the development of the Valley Hospital site was always in the discussion, the opportunity to address this as a redevelopment zone is a massive win-win for everyone, which is the primary reason to move forward with the resolution approving the Affordable Housing Settlement Agreement.

Ms. Mailander stated that the meeting dates for the Village Council had to be approved by resolution tonight.  She indicated that the 2019 Village Council meeting dates, as well as the 2019 meeting dates for the other Village Boards will be posted to the Village website within the next week.

 

12.         RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

 

Ms. Mailander read Resolution #18-389 to go into Closed Session as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.         ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Walsh, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Regular Public Meeting was adjourned at 10:05 P.M.

 

 

 

 

 

 

______________________________

                                                                                                      Ramon M. Hache, Sr.                         

Mayor                        

 

 

 

 

 

______________________________

              Heather A. Mailander

      Village Manager/Village Clerk

  • Hits: 779

COPYRIGHT © 2023 VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD

If you have any trouble with accessing information contained within this website, please contact the MIS Department - 201-670-5500 x2222 or by email mis@ridgewoodnj.net.

Feedback