A REGULAR WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR., COURTROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3, 2015 AT 7:30 P.M.

1.         CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE – MOMENT OF SILENCE

Mayor Aronsohn called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M., and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call, the following were present: Councilmembers Hauck, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn. Also present were Roberta Sonenfeld, Village Manager; Heather Mailander, Village Clerk; and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney. Councilwoman Knudsen was absent.

Mayor Aronsohn led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and asked for a moment of silence in honor of the American men and women serving in our Armed Forces, as well as those serving as first responders.

2.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Aronsohn asked if anyone from the public wished to speak regarding any of the agenda items.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, stated that he had a question about parking. Mr. Loving noted that when he is walking around or driving through the Village, he sometimes sees a dumpster taking up three or four parking spaces. Sometimes, he sees construction going on near the dumpsters. However, Mr. Loving said that he does not see any bags on the meters next to the parking spaces, nor does he see bagged meters next to cars belonging to contractors that are parked all day in metered spots. Mr. Loving wanted to know how a member of the public would know whether use of the spaces has been paid for the day, or whether there is some kind of signal the members of the public should look for to let them know to call someone to alert him/her to these situations. Next, Mr. Loving asked a question about the podium. He noted that in 2013 and 2014, the podium was located at the side of the room, and the announcement was made to inform everyone that it was being moved to facilitate communication, so that the people in the audience did not have to look at the backs of the people presenting at the podium. Mr. Loving noticed that the podium was moved on March 25, 2015, back to the original location. He asked Ms. Mailander why it was moved, and she responded that the Councilmembers directed that it be moved back to this location. Mr. Loving asked Mayor Aronsohn why the podium was moved.

With respect to the podium, Mayor Aronsohn responded that it was moved to the side of the room because the Councilmembers thought it would be nicer for members of the public to be able to speak to the whole room. However, Mayor Aronsohn was hearing complaints from people who said that they could not hear what was being said on the other side of the room, because the acoustics are not that good. In addition, people were complaining because they said they were trying to address the Village Council. That is why the podium was moved back to its original position.

Ms. Sonenfeld responded to the question about bagging parking meters. She said the answer is embarrassing, because it is that the Village ran out of bags for the parking meters. One of the reasons for running out of bags was that they were not always returned. A new shipment of bags has just arrived, and some have been provided to the valet parking services. Ms. Sonenfeld will count the number of bags currently in the Village’s inventory. She reminded everyone that it is necessary to obtain a permit before putting out those large dumpsters, and Mr. Loving’s question is a good one with respect to whether the Parking Enforcement Officers are investigating these situations. Ms. Sonenfeld said she will confirm whether that is being done. She is also hoping to obtain more bags for the parking meters. Mr. Loving asked for confirmation that if a parking meter is not bagged, that should be a signal for someone to call Village Hall and alert someone to the situation. Ms. Sonenfeld answered that it would be a good rule once more bags are obtained.

Tom Kossoff, 46 Heermance Place, asked if anyone had ever proposed making a one-way loop around the CBD, from Franklin Avenue to Broad Street, and back to Ridgewood Avenue. With the new multi-family housing development that is likely to be coming in, Mr. Kossoff is concerned that the level of vehicular and pedestrian traffic congestion will also increase. If the loop was implemented, Mr. Kossoff believes that bike lanes might also be installed. He noted that he did not include Maple Avenue, because that is the thoroughfare. Mr. Kossoff also pointed out that all of this would be subject to any necessary engineering and traffic studies. Mr. Kossoff recalled that some years ago, Councilman Paul Callan brought up the idea of alfresco dining, which took away some of the sidewalk in certain areas. If the streets were made to go one way, Mr. Kossoff believes that the Village could recapture some of what is lost to development by widening the sidewalks and having the bike lanes. It could also enhance the shopping experience, while limiting the number of cars going through the area, so that more people can enjoy themselves in the CBD. Mr. Kossoff added that it is very congested along Ridgewood Avenue, and trying to parallel-park is very tight. Mr. Kossoff suggested thinking outside of the box and coming up with a creative notion to facilitate movement throughout the CBD. Mayor Aronsohn responded that he appreciates the suggestion put forth by Mr. Kossoff, and he is very supportive of looking at new ideas to alleviate congestion in the CBD. That is why he supports erecting one or two parking garages in the CBD, because it would eliminate parking on Ridgewood Avenue, and allow the sidewalks to be widened, as Mr. Kossoff suggested. That would make it much easier and safer for people to walk around in that area. As far as one-way streets are concerned, that is an issue that has been discussed by this Village Council, as well as previous Village Councils, but Mayor Aronsohn believes that as there is progress with all of the proposed changes in the CBD, it will be incumbent upon the Councilmembers, as well as the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee, to revisit those issues.

Ms. Mailander noted for the record that Councilwoman Knudsen arrived to the meeting at 7:43 P.M.

There were no other comments from the public at this time, and Mayor Aronsohn closed the time for public comment.

3.         DISCUSSION

a.         Parking:

1.)        Increase Fine Schedule for Parking Tickets

Ms. Sonenfeld requested that this proposal to increase fines for parking tickets be withdrawn from consideration, because Councilwoman Hauck raised some concerns about this issue. After considering Councilwoman Hauck’s comments, Ms. Sonenfeld agrees with her. The concern has to do with the fact that people are just now getting used to the new parking rules and options that are being provided, and to start increasing ticket prices after also increasing parking fees in the various parking lots is not good timing. In addition, Ms. Sonenfeld has been saying that the pricing dynamic, in general, needs to be reviewed throughout the Village as the plans to build a new parking garage move forward. Although she believes the reasoning behind the ordinance is still valid, Ms. Sonenfeld noted that due to the increase in the State fees, the Village receives approximately $6.50 for each parking ticket. Councilman Pucciarelli agreed that, with the introduction of Parkmobile at the same time, the timing is not right increase penalties. Ms. Sonenfeld pointed out that parking tickets in any other municipalities around Ridgewood range from $20-$65.

Councilman Sedon noted that, after reading the documents, it is hard to believe that there are people who get 15-20 parking tickets every year, which Ms. Sonenfeld confirmed. Councilwoman Knudsen agreed that the issue should be revisited, because she was struck by the amounts of money collected by the Village for each parking ticket, after the State fees were deducted, and the Village’s portion is a very nominal sum.

Councilwoman Hauck reiterated her concern that it seems like it is too much, too soon. She believes it would be better to give people the chance to become accustomed to the new parking regulations and fees before introducing new, increased fines.

2.)        Bond Ordinance – Pre-Construction Funding for Hudson Street Parking Garage

Ms. Sonenfeld explained that this arose as a result of the discussion about the extra $500,000 bond ordinance for pre-construction funding for the Hudson Street garage. It was thought that it might be a good idea to present some facts relating to the proposal. Ms. Sonenfeld will discuss the costs to date, and what the $500,000 represents in a broad timeline. Mayor Aronsohn will be presenting a proposal he has been working on with respect to a non-binding resolution.

From a cost perspective, Ms. Sonenfeld reminded everyone that $100,000 was put into a capital ordinance earlier this year. To date, approximately $2,400 has been spent to advertise the ordinance; legal fees associated with the ordinance; and payment for phase 1 of the environmental study that was done. Approximately $97,000 has been encumbered, including $5,600 for surveying fees; the remainder of the environmental study, which is $86,000; and the financing costs to do a bond issue, which is another $5,000. That leaves the remainder of $741.38 in the original ordinance, which is supposed to cover all of the remaining pre-work on the parking garage. As Ms. Sonenfeld and her team discussed this, they decided that they should come back to the Village Council to request enough money to get up to the actual construction phase of the parking garage. Bob Rooney, Chief Financial Officer/Director of the Parking Utility, spoke to someone in Millburn, NJ, who recently funded a parking garage, and discovered that they spent approximately $467,000 on design and engineering of a parking garage. Added to that is the fee charged by Walker Parking Consultants, which totals another $7,500, as well as financing costs on the bond issues. That is how Ms. Sonenfeld and her team arrived at the $500,000 figure.

As far as a timeline is concerned, Ms. Sonenfeld noted that the contract with Walker Parking Consultants has been signed so they can begin the analysis and comparison of traditional parking garages versus automated parking garages. It is hoped that this will be received by the end of June or early July. Once Ms. Sonenfeld has the Walker study, an RFP will be issued shortly thereafter for the design (after the determination is made by the Village Council whether to go with a traditional parking garage or an automated one). It is hoped that sometime in August, designs will be received from the RFP and a decision can be made about which firm should be awarded the contract. By October-November, the design should be completed so that an RFP can be issued for construction of the garage by November-December. Shovels should be in the ground after the winter thaw of 2016.

Mayor Aronsohn stated that he had an idea based on a June 30, 2015, deadline for some of the preliminary work, including the first stage of the environmental analysis, the survey, and the comparison of conventional versus automated parking garages. Once the preliminary work has been done, it is hoped that a decision can be made in July whether to go with an automated or conventional garage, and an RFP can be drafted and put out for a design. Mayor Aronsohn thought that while this process is occurring, it might be a good idea to have a municipal non-binding referendum as part of the election in November, asking residents how they feel about floating a bond ordinance to pay for the parking garage. Although it would be non-binding, it would give Councilmembers a sense of how the community feels about it, and may get the community excited about the changes to come. The timing also works out well, because as the design is provided some time in September or October, that will be a good opportunity to generate community discussion, and to find out how residents feel about this issue. Mayor Aronsohn spoke to the Bergen County League of Municipalities about this, as well as with the Bergen County Clerk and the Deputy County Clerk about the timing of a non-binding referendum. The referendum question, in the form of a resolution, would have to be presented to the Bergen County Clerk’s office by August 14, 2015, to allow them the time needed to put the question on the referendum and have it printed on the ballot.

Councilman Pucciarelli commented that no matter what, the $500,000 bond is absolutely necessary in order to cover the pre-construction soft costs. He believes a garage must have form and substance in the form of architectural drawings, engineering plans, and to make the referendum meaningful, the public would have to know how much money is involved. The only way to find that out is to decide whether it will be an automated garage or a conventional one, and then to establish what type of engineering and architectural concepts will be considered. The garage was a topic of discussion at the CBD forums, and the majority of speakers pointed out that the issue of a parking garage has been discussed many times in Ridgewood, and they wanted to know when it would actually happen.

Councilman Sedon thinks the idea of a non-binding referendum is a good one, and he agrees with everything that has been said so far. However, with respect to the pre-construction costs, he supports them, but he does not know if it is necessary to spend that money right away, because no determination has yet been made about whether to go with a traditional or automated parking garage. There is also the fact that no one knows what kind of contamination, if any, is in the ground, which must be considered. Mayor Aronsohn and Ms. Sonenfeld pointed out that no monies would actually be borrowed until a determination is made.

Ms. Sonenfeld added that the phase 1 study is now available, and she and Christopher Rutishauser, Village Engineer, met with representatives from the environmental group today. A gasoline tank was found on the Hudson Street property, which needs to be explored. However, outside of that, relatively few anomalies have been found with respect to the rest of the property. There are several more tests which need to be performed, including a ground penetration radon test, a magnetic test, and borings. All of this should be completed by the end of the month. The reason for voting for the bond ordinance now is due to the fact that it takes several weeks to get all of this done. However, Ms. Sonenfeld assured Councilman Sedon that the money will not be used until the necessary information is obtained. The extra evaluations will also provide information with respect to the water levels and the depth to rock, which will help when designing the structure. The environmental news so far has been satisfactory.

Councilwoman Hauck commented that the timing of the idea is good. She has always liked the idea of referenda, because it is very difficult for Councilmembers to be able to vote with conviction when they only hear from people who come to meetings to express their opinions, which is a small percentage of the population. Councilwoman Hauck also likes the idea of having increased participation. She thinks this is a proactive step, and that this is supported by the majority of the residents.

Councilwoman Knudsen acknowledged that the idea of a garage is something that everyone would like to bring to a reality. Some of her concerns include the lack of a more comprehensive plan as to how the garage works for the entire CBD, because she originally thought that strategically located smaller garages, whether at North Walnut Street, Hudson Street, or in some other available location, might be a better way to go. Councilwoman Knudsen is also concerned when she hears discussion about automated parking garages and the possibility of 400 cars in a building at a location like the corner of Hudson Street and Broad Street, which she knows is a very congested location. She read a letter last week from a consultant who indicated that the width was not sufficient for a traditional parking garage, so the Village would have no choice but to erect an automated garage. The response from the Village Engineer was to disregard that, because studies were done that show that the building could be cantilevered, as well as other accommodations that could be made to work at that location. Councilwoman Knudsen is very concerned that a true, comprehensive study has not been done about whether building a parking garage at that location is effective, efficient, and safe, without adding more congestion to that area. Councilwoman Knudsen said she would like to see the question on a non-binding referendum, as well as a similar question about the North Walnut Street Redevelopment Zone, and the Kensington Assisted Living Facility. Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she is not entirely comfortable without getting a lot more information before dedicating a large amount of money to this endeavor.

Mayor Aronsohn pointed out that the resolution that was adopted last week to award the contract to Walker Parking Consultants is for the exact type of analysis that Councilwoman Knudsen mentioned. Councilman Pucciarelli commented that he believes that $500,000 allocated to soft costs will get the Village to the point where people who know how to design garages will be able to tell the Village what is possible and what it will cost. He thinks it is clearly time to move forward, and the Village must spend the money to know exactly what is to be built, what it will cost, and what the state-of-the-art design for garage is at this time. Ms. Sonenfeld noted that one of the goals of the Councilmembers and the Village Manager is to make government work faster, which was done with valet parking. Bond ordinances take at least six weeks, and during that time, other work can be on-going, and as long as everyone understands that the money will not be spent until certain criteria have been met, the bond ordinance is a good idea.

Councilwoman Knudsen pointed out that Mr. Rutishauser was the one who came out with the information about their own studies, which is why she mentioned it. She also noted that Councilman Sedon asked about traffic studies, and whether or not the traffic studies submitted as part of some of the applications before the Planning Board could be utilized to determine whether or not this was an appropriate area for the amount of vehicular traffic that would be going through the Hudson Street and Broad Street intersection. One of the things Mr. Rutishauser pointed out was that those studies were not to the level of detail that would be required for a parking garage with that number of parking spaces, which causes Councilwoman Knudsen to wonder whether the Village has done its due diligence to ensure that the actual location is appropriate for the type and size of parking garage that is being proposed. She would also like more information about what the impact will be on Hudson Street and Broad Street. Those are more important areas to be considered than just the design. Ms. Sonenfeld responded that the design and engineering phase of the project will evaluate all of that, and the Village will certainly demand that those issues be considered. Mayor Aronsohn noted that the comparison/analysis of a conventional versus an automated parking garage has already been authorized so an RFP can be issued for professionals to come in and evaluate the site and give some very concrete ideas, as well as more information. He added that if all of the Councilmembers support a public referendum, this information is vital for that referendum. Mayor Aronsohn believes that having some kind of rendering or design that people can see will help them to make a decision in a non-binding referendum. Councilwoman Knudsen noted that there is a lot going on in the CBD, and she is very concerned from a Planning Board aspect that all the necessary criteria are met. She suggested that there could also be a public referendum on whether the residents want to have an assisted living facility in Ridgewood. Mayor Aronsohn responded that he thinks they are two different issues, because the parking garage proposal for Hudson Street involves spending public money, while the North Walnut Street project involves a developer spending its money. Every issue cannot be put on a public referendum, but the parking garage issue seems to lend itself to public discussion. Councilwoman Knudsen believes that the issue is engaging the public, especially when one considers that both of those projects will make a permanent change to the character of the Village. She added that whether public or private money is being spent, both properties are still owned by the Village. Mayor Aronsohn noted that some of the property is privately owned in the North Walnut Street parking lot, where the assisted living facility is being proposed.

Mayor Aronsohn mentioned that he would be bringing this up at the parking committee meeting on Friday, and he believes it fits in with the proposed timeline set forth by Ms. Sonenfeld.

Councilman Pucciarelli supports the idea of a non-binding referendum, but he thinks it is important to consider the voter turnout, due to the fact that it is possible that proponents or opponents of the garage will come out in greater numbers to vote, but he believes there is enough public interest in the issue to encourage voters on both sides to come out.

Councilman Sedon said he agrees with most of the comments made by the other Councilmembers, and the steps that have been taken with respect to the environmental study as well as awarding a contract to Walker Parking Consultants for their analysis, because it will give everyone a lot more information with which to proceed.

3.)        Update on Corella Court

Ms. Sonenfeld mentioned that this is the second iteration of an ordinance that is scheduled for Public Hearing next week. Ms. Sonenfeld reminded everyone that many residents in that area express some concerns, and that Corella Court is a cul-de-sac near Hawes School. People, particularly teachers, were parking in that area, making it impossible for emergency vehicles to get through. The consensus is that the root of the problem is the fact that Hawes School recently expanded, decreasing the number of available parking spaces in their parking lot, and as a result both teachers and visitors are now forced to park on the surrounding streets. Last weekend, seven extra parking spots were painted in at Hawes School, as well as a crosswalk going across Corella Court. Ms. Sonenfeld and Mr. Rutishauser also reviewed the area in person, noticing that there were 80 cars parked in and around Corella Court, which still made it impossible for emergency vehicles to get through. They also noticed that some parking spots at Hawes School were not used, which Ms. Sonenfeld brought to the attention of Dr. Fishbein, Superintendent of Schools, and there is now emphasis placed on the fact that there are more parking spots available at Hawes School, and they should be used. The Citizens Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC) has also been reviewing the situation over the past couple of weeks, and recommended that this ordinance be held to see how traffic is progressing now that the extra spots at Hawes School are being used. In total, there are now 15-16 extra spots available at Hawes School. To date, the spots that only required painting have been made available; there are a few others that also require a bit of construction. The CSAC recommended tabling any action on this ordinance until results can be seen from the changes in that area. Ms. Sonenfeld and Mr. Rutishauser recommend moving forward with the ordinance, and Ms. Sonenfeld suggested that Councilman Sedon might have more information regarding the discussion among the members of the CSAC.

Councilman Sedon reminded everyone that he mentioned this recommendation in his Council Report at the previous Village Council meeting. Councilman Sedon believes that the Councilmembers must move forward with the ordinance so that emergency vehicles and other Village service vehicles can access that area, which means that parking must be restricted to one side of the road. If this is implemented and it does not work out, it can be changed. That is why Councilman Sedon supports moving forward with the ordinance.

b.         Budget:

1.)        Award Contract – Remote Telemetry Units – Ridgewood Water

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this will award a contract for three remote telemetry units for Ridgewood Water. The current units no longer function, and they are over 20 years old. This is an emergency award to Emerson Process Management with funding being available. These units communicate with the SCADA system to control pumps, chlorinators, and analyzers, as well as other chemical feeds. Ms. Sonenfeld commented that more of these will need to be purchased over time, but the whole system is being evaluated at this time, which is why only three are currently being purchased. Frank Moritz, Director of Ridgewood Water, formulated a five-year capital plan, and several weeks ago, the Councilmembers voted to extend that plan for 20 years.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked if this were an emergency, would the Village pay premium price for these units. Ms. Sonenfeld responded that she does not believe so, and that another question that might be asked is what is being done to make up for the fact that these units are not functioning. The answer to the question is that Ridgewood Water personnel are performing those tasks manually.

The Village Council agreed to put this resolution on the agenda for the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

2.)        Award Contract – Playground Mulch – Parks and Recreation

Ms. Sonenfeld explained that there are a couple of items on the agenda that are hitting the statutory limit of $17,500, so they must be approved by the Councilmembers. This particular one is an award of contract to Downes Tree Service for playground mulch, for which the payment exceeds the statutory limit. Councilman Pucciarelli asked if this was strictly for supplies, and not for services, which Ms. Sonenfeld confirmed.

The Village Council agreed to put this resolution on the agenda for the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

3.)        Award Contract Under State Contract – Computer Equipment

Ms. Sonenfeld commented that this is another issue in which the State cooperative purchasing program is being used to purchase computer equipment. The items to be purchased are technology-related, and Village Council approval is required to spend more than $17,500. The Village Council agreed to put this resolution on the agenda for the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

4.)        Award Contract for Emergency Purchase – Larger Capacity Chemical Pumps for Sodium Hypochlorite – Ridgewood Water

Ms. Sonenfeld noted that this is another emergency purchase of pumps that are required in order to comply with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) mandates. The same pumps were purchased once before; they are being purchased as wells that need to be treated for corrosion control are identified.

Councilwoman Hauck asked a question about the additives in the water that protect against bacterial growth and corrosion that can pass through the water, and if they change the softness of the water, or decrease the mineral content, so that Ridgewood now has softer water. Ms. Sonenfeld said that is a question for Frank Moritz, who will be attending the meeting next week.

The Village Council agreed to put this resolution on the agenda for the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

5.)        Award Contract – Printing Services – Ridgewood Water

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that printing is another contract that will exceed the State limit of $17,500, for the purchase of this service. The Village Council agreed to put this resolution on the agenda for the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

6.)        Award Contract – Parts, Supplies, and Service – Solid Waste, Recycling, and Street Department Vehicles

Ms. Sonenfeld commented that parts, supplies, and service for the Solid Waste, Recycling, and Street Department vehicles is another contract that will exceed the $17,500 State limit. It awards the contract for purchase of some sanitation equipment to a sole provider. The items to be purchased are parts and supplies for the Fleet Division. The Village Council agreed to put this resolution on the agenda for the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

c.         Policy:

1.)        Amend Chapter 3 – Administration of Government

Ms. Sonenfeld explained that this will amend Chapter 3, Administration of Government. It represents one of the continuing joint activities between the Village Manager’s and Village Clerk’s offices for general updating and cleanup of certain ordinances (the salary ordinance immediately following this one is another ordinance which will be updated). The intention of this ordinance is to reflect reality and projects that are currently on-going, as well as changes in the Building Department and Human Resources.

Sharyn Matthews, Director of Human Resources, summarized the changes. Revisions were recommended to Chapter 3, Article V, modifying and/or adding sections to that Chapter and Article, including the addition of the Department of Human Resources, as well as a Director for that department. Other sections were deleted, either partially or entirely.

Ms. Sonenfeld reminded everyone that several months ago, a layer of management between the Village Manager and the Building Department was eliminated. As a result of that, it was necessary to change the ordinance. The ordinance now reflects changes that were made in the Building Department and the Department of Human Resources.

Councilman Pucciarelli said that he did not disagree with the changes, but he thought it might be helpful to put the revised organizational chart on the Village website.

Councilman Sedon noted that when he read the proposed ordinance, he saw that there were some assistant positions mentioned in the new Human Resources Department, and asked if that means that there will be more people hired. Ms. Sonenfeld said that is not the case, and she reminded him of the budget meeting on February 28, 2015, when there was a discussion about how this would be handled. The Human Resources Department will be responsible for payroll, as well as health benefits administration, and the people currently performing those functions will be reporting to Ms. Matthews. Councilman Sedon recalled that when this was first discussed, it seemed to him that the Village would hire a part-time Human Resources specialist, yet Councilman Sedon heard references to a Human Resources Department with a full-time employee for the first time at the February 28^th budget meeting. Therefore, sometime between the introduction of the part-time Human Resources function and the first budget meeting, there was no discussion about this additional expense, nor was there any input solicited from Councilman Sedon about it. He pointed out that it is a long-term, on-going expense for something that Councilman Sedon believes was already being provided to the Village, because handling personnel was in the Village Manager’s job description. Ms. Sonenfeld responded she and others feel that it is important to have a professional Human Resources Department to handle personnel matters centrally. Moreover, she pointed out that there was a strategic discussion about this on February 28, 2015, and it was made very clear at that time. If there were any issues between that time and when the vote was taken, Ms. Sonenfeld said she would have been pleased to have any discussions with any of the Councilmembers about it. Councilman Sedon reiterated that he heard and participated in the discussion at the budget meeting, but before that time, there was no discussion, so he did not have any input on this issue. It seems to him that this ordinance is proposed to “rubberstamp” a decision that was already made.

Mayor Aronsohn interjected that he believes there are two issues being discussed: one is a substantive issue, and the other is an issue with the process. He thinks that Councilman Sedon has a substantive issue with respect to whether or not a full-time Human Resources professional is needed in Ridgewood, as well as a Department dedicated to Human Resources. Ms. Sonenfeld is speaking to the process, and she takes issue with the idea that she may have misled anyone, because she stated that she brought this proposal to the Village Council in February. Nothing was confirmed until the budget was adopted.

Councilman Sedon reiterated that he was not given the chance to provide input on this matter, and there was no meaningful conversation about creating this Department. It is an on-going, six-figure expense that the taxpayers must bear going forward. Ms. Sonenfeld answered that the function will pay for itself in dividends over the next few years. It involves issues like better performance management control; better leadership and succession planning; and how the staff is leveraged. In fact, Ms. Sonenfeld believes that the addition of a Human Resources professional will actually save the Village money over time.

Councilwoman Knudsen commented that she understands why people feel that it is necessary to have a Human Resources professional on staff, but she would describe it as a “redundancy” in job descriptions, and she raised that question during the budget hearing. There are current procedures in effect that cover Human Resources issues, in which the employee would go through his/her union representatives and/or supervisory staff. There is also the Civil Service Administration, which deals with issues involving those employees. All of that also falls within the job description of the Village Manager. That is why Councilwoman Knudsen also questions the redundancy of having a Human Resources professional as a full-time staff member.

Councilman Pucciarelli thought that the budget process for 2015 was very transparent, and he remembers that budget meeting, and the discussion. He recalled that there was some groundwork laid before that time, and although he can recall no discussion on the matter, he does not believe it was due to a lack of opportunity. There were a lot of times during the budget discussion when it was decided to move on to the next area to be discussed because the budget was very complicated, and there were a lot of items on the agenda to be discussed. Councilman Pucciarelli also recalled that over the past four years, there were many Human Resources issues that came up and were discussed in Closed Session meetings, which he cannot discuss in detail. It seems that a lot of Ms. Sonenfeld time was being spent dealing with individual employee complaints, hearings, and meetings with labor attorneys. Moreover, Councilman Pucciarelli thinks that the Fire Department contract negotiations were handled very well by the part-time Human Resources person at that time. Although Ms. Sonenfeld took the leadership role in the negotiations, all of the groundwork was being done by the part-time Human Resources professional at that time, saving the Village a lot of money and contentious negotiations.

Councilwoman Hauck recalled that Councilwoman Knudsen and Councilman Sedon made the other Councilmembers aware of their reservations regarding hiring a full-time employee for the Human Resources Department; however, the other three Councilmembers supported the idea. Therefore, there was already evidence that the majority of the Councilmembers supported hiring a full-time Human Resources professional. Councilwoman Hauck is not sure that it was necessary to discuss that separately to any further extent, because the majority supported it. The reason the majority supported the issue is that while Ms. Sonenfeld is in charge of management, and will make collateral decisions regarding personnel, all management decisions require background information and due diligence. There are contract negotiation issues, as well as litigation issues and new policies for internal resolutions of small issues within the various departments. Those should be handled by a full-time Human Resources professional. Councilwoman Hauck believes that the position will pay for itself in due course, as was articulated at the February 28^th budget hearing. Councilwoman Hauck pointed out that Councilman Sedon and Councilwoman Knudsen have the right to disagree, but because the majority supports it, it is time to move on.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked who would be in charge of employee benefits administration, and whether that would be a person who is already on staff. Ms. Matthews explained that there is someone in the Finance Department who currently takes care of payroll, and another person who is responsible for employee benefits administration. Currently, they work with Ms. Matthews on an informal basis with respect to employee benefits and payroll questions, as well as questions regarding the Fair Labor Standards Act; contract administration; and other questions of that sort. Ms. Matthews stated that those are the kinds of questions that should be handled in Human Resources, because they are the types of questions that she can answer, and they are not Finance questions. Councilman Pucciarelli noted that the “dotted-line relationship” that Ms. Matthews mentioned is helpful to show the natural alliance between her and the employees in the Finance Department, as well as in other departments, who might report to her. The organizational chart makes that clear.

Mayor Aronsohn reiterated that he does not know of any other organization of a similar size to Ridgewood, either in the public sector or the private sector, which does not have a dedicated Human Resources professional. Everyone agrees that people are the greatest commodity in the Village. It is essential to have someone who is dedicated to doing the job of a Human Resources professional. As far as the process is concerned, Mayor Aronsohn believes it was as transparent and open as it could be. The concept was introduced in February, and because Ms. Sonenfeld is always in Village Hall, anyone who has a question on any issue can ask her. The process lent itself to discussion, and Mayor Aronsohn noted that it is perfectly acceptable for everyone to reach different conclusions.

Mayor Aronsohn also suggested to Ms. Matthews that the new organizational chart be made available to Village personnel, as well as on the Village website.

The Village Council agreed to put this ordinance on the agenda for introduction at the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

2.)        Revise Various Salary Ordinances

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that, as with the previous agenda item, a review was conducted of the various salary ordinances, and it was discovered that four salary ordinances had not been revised in the last 4-5 years. Titles that no longer exist were eliminated, and new titles were added. Ms. Sonenfeld worked with Ms. Mailander and Ms. Matthews on this review, and it does not cover everything. However, it does provide for an annual review of the salary ordinances to ensure that all new titles are reflected in the ordinances.

Ms. Mailander pointed out that titles that were not previously used were added, and titles that are no longer used were deleted. The ordinances also reflect salary ranges, which are set by the Village, not by Civil Service. They conform to such regulations as one that requires an employee with a higher title than another employee to be paid a higher salary.

Councilman Sedon asked if the Village Manager’s salary would be revised to reflect the addition of the Human Resources Department. He noted that in the past, personnel matters were under the purview of the Village Manager, but because it is now being given its own department, he wanted to know if the Village Manager’s salary would reflect that outsourcing. Ms. Sonenfeld stated that it is not being outsourced, because Ms. Matthews still reports to her, and she still spends time on personnel issues. Mayor Aronsohn interjected that there is no plan to revise the Village Manager’s salary.

The Village Council agreed to put this ordinance on the agenda for introduction at the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

d.         Operations:

1.)        Approve Liquor License Transfer – Oak Street Liquors, LLC to FISH, Ridgewood, LLC

Ms. Sonenfeld stated that this is for approval for the transfer of a liquor license between Oak Street Liquors and FISH restaurant. Police Chief John Ward indicated that all of the background checks have been completed, and the Police Department authorizes this transfer. Ms. Mailander added that in addition to all of the background checks, the fees have been paid; and all advertising has been done. She is currently awaiting receipt of the tax clearance certificate, and the applicant’s attorneys have notified her that they have that. As long as it is received prior to the next Village Council meeting, the resolution can be adopted. Councilman Pucciarelli asked how many liquor licenses are authorized for the Village, and Ms. Mailander responded that there are 17 liquor licenses. There are seven consumption licenses. The Village Council agreed to put this resolution on the agenda for the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

2.)        Authorization to Execute Green Communities Grant Application

Ms. Sonenfeld commented that this authorizes the Village Manager to execute the Green Communities Grant application, and will begin the process of completing the Community Forestry Management Plan.

Councilman Sedon noted that this is included in the 2015 budget, and will pay for approximately ¾ of the consultant’s work. It will take approximately one year to complete an inventory with recommendations going forward on how to manage Village trees so they do not become a problem in the future and create safety issues. It will also include recommendations for life care and other similar recommendations. There is also an extra layer of liability protection for Shade Tree Commissioners and volunteers. This application opens the Village to opportunities for more grants to get financial help to take care of tree issues. The Village Council agreed to put this resolution on the agenda for the June 10, 2015 Public Meeting.

4.         REVIEW OF JUNE 10, 2015 AGENDA

Ms. Mailander announced that the ordinances to be introduced include: Amend Chapter 265 Vehicles and Traffic – Valet Loading and Unloading Zones – Chestnut Street and Prospect Street; Bond Ordinance – Pre-Construction Funding for Hudson Street Parking Garage; Amend Chapter 265 – Prohibit U-Turn on Portion of Chestnut Street; Amend Chapter 265 Vehicles and Traffic – Angle Parking; Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Taxi Stands and Bus Stops; Amend Chapter 3 – Administration of Government; Amend Various Salary Ordinances.

The scheduled Public Hearings include: Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Corella Court – Stop Sign and Parking Restrictions.

Resolutions include: Waive Fourth Of July Vendor Fees; Grant Permission to Fireworks Company for Fireworks Display; Authorize Snowplowing Agreement with Bergen County; Authorize Purchase of Skatewave Equipment from Borough of Fair Lawn; Title 59 Approval – Landscaping Services – Ridgewood Water; Award Contract – Landscaping Services – Ridgewood Water; Award Contract – Large Capacity Chemical Pumps for Sodium Hypochlorite – Ridgewood Water; Award Contract – Remote Telemetry Units – Ridgewood Water; Award Contract – Playground Mulch – Parks And Recreation; Award Contract – Printing Services; Award Contract to Sole Provider – Lab Chemicals – Ridgewood Water; Award Contract under State Contract – Computer Equipment; Award Contract under State Contract – Mobile Camera System for Police Cars; Award Extraordinary Unspecifiable Services Contract – Corrosion Inhibitor – Ridgewood Water; Declare Property Surplus – Desks and Chairs; Approve Liquor License Transfer – Oak Street Liquors, LLC, to FISH Ridgewood, LLC; Appoint Village Attorney; Appoint Village Bond Attorney; Appoint Village Prosecutor and Assistant Village Prosecutor; Appoint Public Defender; Appoint Community Development Representative; Appoint Representatives to Open Space Trust Regional Committee; Appoint Village Councilmembers As Liaisons to Various Boards and Committees; Award Contract – Parts, Supplies, and Service – Solid Waste, Recycling and Street Department Vehicles; Authorization to Execute Green Communities Grant Application.

5.         MANAGER’S REPORT

Ms. Sonenfeld started her report by discussing Bergen LEADS and Teen LEADS, which is a Ridgewood leadership program at Ridgewood High School. Teen LEADS is based on Bergen LEADS, and made a wonderful presentation prior to tonight’s Village Council meeting. Ms. Sonenfeld reminded everyone that part of the budget included staff development investments to be made, and one of those is to fund one person from the organization to participate in Bergen LEADS. Ms. Sonenfeld’s experience with Teen LEADS led her to the position of Village Manager, but it really opens one up to the community and to the County. The program includes monthly seminars during the ten-month program, and teaching the participants about the various aspects of the County, including different approaches. This year, there were 53 applicants for 30 spots in Bergen LEADS. Captain Jacqueline Luthcke was chosen to represent Ridgewood, and Margie Downes went through the process and earned a scholarship, so she will also be attending Bergen LEADS.

Ms. Sonenfeld mentioned that Dylan Hansen, Technology Supervisor, was accepted into the Rutgers Certified Government Chief Information Officer Program. This offers certification for CIOs, and is a very select program.

Regarding parking, Ms. Sonenfeld noted that Parkmobile continues to be used in the parking lots. Last week, there were 90+ transactions on a daily basis, with 150+ on Friday and Saturday. Zones have been created for the CBD, and as a result, they will probably be implemented by the end of June. Ms. Sonenfeld is especially interested in the click and park option for those Ridgewood residents who desired one-day parking permits, and this option is being used by one or two residents per day.

Ms. Sonenfeld is involved in discussions with the Chamber of Commerce regarding a regionalized valet parking service, rather than using individual vendors for the current valet parking system.

Ms. Sonenfeld mentioned the Bergen County Bike and Pedestrian Plan, which was forwarded to the Councilmembers. The plan comprises more than 200 pages it was a study done by an outside consulting firm that identified safety and mobility improvements for walking and bicycling across eight different municipalities, including Ridgewood. It advances a complete streets approach, and a bicycle/walking network throughout the eight municipalities. For example, it suggests pedestrian safety measures at 19 separate locations, and bike lane/shared lane markings on more than 10 Ridgewood streets. Mr. Rutishauser was a participant in the report as a representative from Ridgewood, and Ms. Sonenfeld invited him to attend the June 24^th Work Session meeting to summarize this plan.

The May 29^th Bergen Record discussed a Bergen County-Rutgers planned partnership, which is a partnership aimed at performing data analysis and adding metrics and performance metrics to County government operations. Students from Rutgers who use the program will be part of this partnership. They are considering evaluating road salt, fleet management, delivery of Health and Human Resources services, and other matters. There is no cost for this program. There is also an opportunity for 10 municipalities in the County to participate in this, and Ms. Sonenfeld has indicated that Ridgewood is very eager to do so.

Next, Ms. Sonenfeld addressed the “swatting” incident. Basically, “swatting” is the equivalent of tricking emergency services into dispatching SWAT teams based on a false report of a critical incident. Ms. Sonenfeld reminded everyone that George Washington Middle School was on temporary lockdown Thursday morning after a prank threat/”swatting” incident. The call was received at 10:00 A.M. at the school, claiming that there was a shooter on the roof. The school immediately ordered a lockdown. Ms. Sonenfeld commended the officers of the Ridgewood Police Department for doing a fabulous job, as always, in combination with police personnel from Glen Rock, Midland Park, and Wyckoff. All of the preparedness training that Chief Ward has been doing enabled the situation to be closed down by approximately 10:39 A.M. This was the fifth such incident in northern New Jersey since March 2015. It is estimated that the cost to Ridgewood from a police perspective was approximately $3,800; the costs for the other communities are not known. There were 15 Ridgewood police officers involved, and the Fire Department also was involved. It is still an active investigation.

The Police Department is expecting seven vacancies, as was previously discussed during the budget process, due to retirements. Instead of hiring all new recruits, some of the positions will be filled via inter-governmental transfers. The backgrounds of the nine candidates for transfer were reviewed, and they were also interviewed. The current number of candidates is three. This means that the Police Department will be able to have these officers on patrol faster than before, and it will cost less.

Concerning updating the Village website, Ms. Sonenfeld has been meeting with Dylan Hansen, Mayor Aronsohn, and Councilwoman Hauck. It was decided to hire a website consultant to finish this process. Ms. Sonenfeld and Mr. Hansen are now concluding the process for hiring a Ridgewood firm to work with them in the final stages. During the budget hearings, the fact that there is a line item in Technology to get outside help at times was discussed. Ms. Sonenfeld and Mr. Hansen met with representatives from the firm today to discuss the issues, and the firm will be working over the next couple of weeks on an evaluation of the old website and the new website, with comparisons and contrasts.

Ms. Sonenfeld noted that the Councilmembers needed to have more information about COAH, and she asked Mr. Rogers to explain. Mr. Rogers said he was asked to discuss the most recent decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court with respect to affordable housing in New Jersey. On March 10, 2015, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an opinion dealing with a series of legal actions that have taken place over the past several years to try and force the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) to come up with new regulations and guidelines for the construction of affordable housing in the State. Due to some actions taken by Governor Christie’s office, as well as a lack of action taken by the New Jersey State Legislature, COAH has essentially become a defunct organization. The Courts have been waiting for approximately 15 years for COAH to develop rules and regulations dealing with the mechanisms and methodology of determining how many units and how to go about providing a realistic opportunity for affordable housing in each community. The current impact on municipalities has been to put them in a very difficult state of affairs. There are no guidelines from the Legislature or from COAH. The Courts have now taken over this issue, and they will be responsible for mandating the municipalities’ efforts to try and provide the adequate number of affordable housing units. The “adequate number” has become a big issue, because formerly, a municipality would be able to find out its adequate number on affordable housing through the established rules and regulations. However, at this time, only one group has set forth an affordable housing number for each community, and that is the Fair Share Housing Commission, which is a private, non-profit group. So far, their numbers are the only numbers available for the municipalities.

The Courts, through this recent decision, have set up a transitional methodology for gaining compliance for every municipality. The decision was handed down on March 10, 2015, and the Court gave a 90-day window for all municipalities to comprehend the impact this will have on them. There is a 30-day window starting on June 8^th or 9^th, and ending on July 9^th, to allow all municipalities that desire to have the opportunity to file declaratory judgment actions in the Superior Court of each County in order to seek protection from the Court against builders’ remedy lawsuits, which were lawsuits set up by the Courts to provide an incentive for municipalities to adhere to the rules and regulations established regarding providing low-income housing. It gave developers and builders a remedy to challenge a municipality’s efforts to try and meet that obligation. If a builder with a development proposal thought a municipality was not meeting its obligation properly, the builder could sue the municipality, seeking a density higher than what was provided in any local ordinance to help a municipality maintain or provide a realistic opportunity for affordable housing in the community. That situation lasted through round two of the Mount Laurel housing guidelines.

At this point, during round three, when the Fair Housing Act was set up, the Act, through COAH, set up a remedy that was not the same as the builders’ remedy that would administratively take care of it through the remediation process with COAH, and at one point, the Village was engaged in mediation with a developer. The Village was involved in that mediation up to the point where some of the third-round rules were found to be unconstitutional. This decision offers an opportunity to try and seek protection of Village ordinances and development by filing a declaratory judgment to show the Court how Ridgewood has attempted to be a participating municipality, as defined in the decision, and seek at least a five-month window during which time the Village is still free to provide and develop its housing plan. As an alternative, the Village could wait for a challenge by a builder, because if the Village does not go through this process, it will again be subject to builders’ remedies. There are some municipalities that think it is the proper way to go, and in fact, there are a number of towns that have not complied with filing affordable housing plans as part of their Master Plans over the years, and elected to deal with each lawsuit as it came. However, Mr. Rogers pointed out that Ridgewood has always made efforts to provide affordable housing in the municipality. Timely filings have been made for all three rounds of the Mount Laurel decisions, and the Village is faced with this again.

Mr. Rogers and Blais Brancheau, Village Planner, have discussed this issue many times, and they are currently putting together a history of efforts that have been made by the Village with respect to each round of this process to comply with the rules and regulations set at the time. Mr. Rogers hopes to file that declaratory judgment action seeking the protections and the five-month window in a timely manner, before July 9^th. Mr. Rogers invited anyone who has questions about this issue to call or email him at any time. When the declaratory judgment action is prepared, prior to its filing, Mr. Rogers will make sure that everyone has a chance to read it.

In her “Response to Residents” section, Ms. Sonenfeld noted that the next “Meet the Manager” event will be on Monday, June 29^th, from 4:30 P.M.-7:30 P.M. Following up on a resident’s complaint from a prior “Meet the Manager” session about a line of sight issue (bushes are encroaching on a sidewalk at East Glen Avenue and Sterling Avenue), Ms. Sonenfeld stated that she visited the site, and the appropriate warning letter has been sent to the property owner. Another resident mentioned that the entrance to the train station parking lot looks unkempt. The upkeep for that location has been performed by a local landscaper for the past several years, but it had not been done recently. Ms. Sonenfeld contacted the landscaper, who will do the necessary work. There is also a small garden in the island of the parking lot which needed beautification, and that is being done. In addition, the ADA signs for the Village Hall parking lot were ordered some weeks ago, but were sent to the wrong address. They have been located, and will be installed on two-sided poles that are five feet high, on movable bases, once they arrive.

Upcoming events include “Register Your Dog Month” for the entire month of June at the Health Department. On June 4^th, the Kasschau Band Shell begins its free entertainment every Tuesday and Thursday night from June 4-August 6. The schedule is available on the Village website. On June 6^th, Graydon Pool will open for the season from 10:00 A.M.-7:30 P.M. There is also a fishing derby scheduled for June 6^th at Darlington Swim Club from 10:00 A.M.-2:00 P.M. Free fishing poles will be given to children who are in grammar school through age 20. The “Best Day Ever” event will kick off its day with a color fun run on June 6^th. The funds collected from the event are used to create some “Best Days” for sick children and their families. On June 7^th, the “Wiffle for Cancer” fundraiser/event is scheduled at Ridgewood High School from 10:00 A.M.-3:00 P.M. The movie in the park for June 10^th will be “Star Wars,” presented by the Ridgewood Guild. Movies will be shown throughout the summer twice a month, on Wednesdays.

6.         COUNCIL REPORTS

Planning Board – Councilwoman Knudsen stated that last night, the Planning Board concluded its hearings and voted on the amendments to the Master Plan pertaining to the AH2, B3R, CR, and C-zone districts. The vote was 6-3 to pass the amendments. Different zones had been bifurcated to allow the Planning Board to vote separately on each individual zone, and the split was 6-3 on each of them. The Village now has zones that will allow a density of approximately 30-35 units per acre, where there currently are 12 or 20 units per acre. The Planning Board will adopt its own resolution regarding these changes, and then the issue will come before the Village Council for discussion and passing an ordinance to reflect these changes. The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 16^th, at Village Hall. The Master Plan re-examination will continue at that time, which will include the open space component, as well as the historic component. Although Councilwoman Knudsen said she did not support these changes, Mayor Aronsohn did, and it came down to a difference of opinion. Councilwoman Knudsen views this as a big change to Ridgewood, and she was not entirely comfortable with the higher density.

Fourth of July Committee – Councilwoman Knudsen mentioned that the Fourth of July Committee will meet on Monday, June 8^th, at 7:30 P.M., at the Ridgewood Firehouse. People are invited to sign up to help with the Fourth of July parade. Parade marshals are still needed, as well as more volunteers. For more information, visit www.ridgewoodjuly4.net.

Civility Roundtable Discussion– Councilman Pucciarelli attended the most recent Civility Roundtable, and in connection with that, one of the participants, Reverend Greg Lisby of Christ Church, left for Worcester, Massachusetts, this week. Councilman Pucciarelli stated that he was given a very good sendoff, and everyone wishes him well.

Ridgewood Arts Council – Councilman Pucciarelli mentioned that the Ridgewood Arts Council (RAC) met last week, and they are now collecting art, as mentioned at previous meetings. Anyone who gives art to the RAC is donating it, not lending it, so the RAC has maximum flexibility in when and where the art will be displayed. So far, there have been many generous offers of art. The RAC is also recruiting trustees for the Ridgewood Arts Foundation, and have already contacted some people in connection with this.

Ridgewood Public Library Board of Trustees– Councilman Pucciarelli attended the most recent meeting of the Public Library Board of Trustees, and as always, the meeting was run well, and their budget is under control. They have some exciting plans to announce regarding the Public Library. There is also some question about the café, which is now temporarily closed, because they are in the process of seeking a new operator for the café. The prior operator’s lease had expired, and was not renewed.

Central Business District Forum – Councilman Pucciarelli mentioned that the sixth Central Business District Forum will be held on Wednesday, June 17^th, in the Sydney V. Stoldt, Jr., Courtroom at Village Hall at 7:30 P.M. The subject will be parking in general, and more specifically, the new Director of the Parking Utility, Bob Rooney, who is also the Chief Financial Officer, will be present. It is hoped that someone from Parkmobile will also be able to attend. Councilman Pucciarelli stated that they would like to get people who are not yet comfortable with using Parkmobile to come to the meeting, and that a tutorial session on downloading and using the app will be presented. There will also be an overview of the various parking zones provided, some of which have changed since the last discussion. There is also an open mic portion of the meeting, and people are invited to share any ideas about the parking garage or anything relating to the CBD.

Civility Roundtable Discussion– Councilwoman Hauck commented that the people who have been coming to the Civility Roundtable meetings have become “regulars,” and 23 people attended the last meeting, representing diverse segments of the community. This was the second meeting in which the focus was on tension within the sports community, and it was mentioned that people need to develop tools to channel anger in a constructive way, not in a personal way. One particular issue that was brought forward was that there is no oversight in the sports community to ensure that people remain civil. The Councilmembers, Village residents, and the Board of Education have a responsibility to oversee and police all of the sports organizations to ensure that they are following their own guidelines regarding civility and sportsmanship. That is a difficult thing, but it seems rational and reasonable to give those who play sports a checklist with guidelines to follow, and it must be submitted once a year with their insurance forms and other necessary paperwork. The paperwork could be kept by the Recreation Department as a reminder that the organization has to be run according to a code of ethics, which must be enforced. The participants also discussed the fact that their job is not to talk about methods, but to discuss in a broader sense what is respect, and how to avoid incivility.

Mayor Aronsohn reiterated comments made by Ms. Sonenfeld regarding the new Village website, which has been a work in progress for some time. Mr. Hansen has been doing a wonderful job on it, and when it is unveiled, people will find it much more user-friendly, with a better search engine, and a lot of information. It will also be much more accessible to users. Mayor Aronsohn suggested that, although there have been people who have looked at the beta version of the new website, all of the Councilmembers should review it and try to use it. He is looking for input and any ideas people might have on how to improve its efficiency.

Regarding the Civility Roundtable, Mayor Aronsohn added that it underscores that Ridgewood residents live in a very smart, thoughtful community. People disagree on certain issues, but they also find a lot of common ground. The discussions are very civil and thoughtful, and Mayor Aronsohn believes they will take Ridgewood where it needs to be on this issue.

With respect to the Planning Board, Mayor Aronsohn commended everyone on the Planning Board for this long process. He particularly commended Charles Nalbantian, Chairman of the Planning Board, who has navigated this process, as well as the Valley Hospital process, very adroitly. Mayor Aronsohn also mentioned Gail Price, Planning Board Attorney, and Ridgewood residents for working together.

Mayor Aronsohn mentioned that someone asked him how many people vote on the Planning Board, and what role do the alternates play. He explained that there are nine regular members of the Planning Board, and there are two alternatives, totaling 11 votes. In addition, Mayor Aronsohn pointed out that three of the votes taken were 9-2; one of them was 8-3; and one was 7-4.

Next, Mayor Aronsohn mentioned the “Best Day Ever”. He mentioned that he would be in the dunk tank again, and that it was possible that Police Chief Ward would also be in the tank, as well as Captain Luthcke and principals and teachers from Ridgewood schools. He encouraged everyone to attend.

Finally, this past Tuesday, Mayor Aronsohn and Chief Ward attended the last meeting before the summer of the interfaith clergy. Mayor Aronsohn praised the faith community in Ridgewood, noting that they get together every month and work together throughout the month on interfaith issues.

7.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Aronsohn stated they would again have comments from the public and asked anyone wishing to address the Village Council to come forward.

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, asked for clarification that if there is an expense that is more than $17,000, it must be approved by the Councilmembers. Ms. Sonenfeld explained that the issue is that, because the Village does not have a Qualified Purchasing Agent (QPA), which many other municipalities have, the Village Council must approve any contract with a single vendor above $17,500. If the Village had a QPA, that limit would increase to approximately $34,000.

Ms. Loving asked if, when a new position is created for which the salary will be six figures, a vote must also be taken. Ms. Sonenfeld pointed out that a vote was taken on the new position, when the budget was approved. Ms. Loving asked if it is not necessary for that issue to be discussed at a Public Hearing. Ms. Sonenfeld responded that any hiring and firing decisions that are made now, which were listed in the approved budget, do not have to be further approved by the Village Council. However, if a new position is being created that is not in the budget, the Village Council must authorize it.

Next, Ms. Loving asked for clarification that the responsibility for Human Resources was formerly managed by the Village Manager, but it was apparently an overwhelming amount of work and had to be put in a new position. Ms. Sonenfeld answered Human Resources fell under the purview of every Director of every Department, but if a problem had to be elevated, it was elevated to the Village Manager. She reiterated that the ultimate responsibility for Human Resources falls to the Village Manager. The new position is a senior resource to leverage the staff that is available, and to work with the various supervisors in making decisions that are important to the community. For example, in the past, too many decisions were made to promote people simply because they had been in a certain position for a number of years. Some of those positions should be opened up to external talent. Moreover, there is no succession plan in the Village, so a leadership succession plan will be developed. These and other things need to get done in order to leverage the organization in a positive way. As Mayor Aronsohn stated earlier, other municipalities of similar size have Human Resources Departments, and many have several staff members dealing with human resource matters. Ms. Sonenfeld also pointed out that in the past, there was no segregation of Human Resources duties. If people felt they could not come to the Village Manager with workplace problems, there was no one else to turn to. This helps to keep checks and balances within the organization. Ms. Sonenfeld pointed out that all of this is on the public record, with a two-page proposal regarding the Human Resources Department. She will make sure that it is on the Village website for people to read.

Ms. Loving commented that the word “outsourcing” was used, which was later refuted. She also pointed out that “being responsible” is not the same as doing the job; and being responsible for someone who is doing the job is not the same as doing the job. In addition, Ms. Loving said that when an elected official asks a question in a calm and reasonable way, it is not civil to reprimand that person for asking the question. Ms. Loving appreciated Councilman Sedon’s question, because she was wondering the same thing. Ms. Sonenfeld responded by saying that, as was mentioned in one of the local newspapers, Councilman Sedon said he voted against the budget because he felt he was misled. Ms. Sonenfeld believes that is not civil, and does not pose a question in an appropriate manner.

Councilman Sedon stated for the record that he still feels misled. Mr. Rogers pointed out that he thought Ms. Loving was referring to the comment made by Councilman Sedon regarding the Village Manager’s salary adjustment, which Ms. Loving said she was. Mr. Rogers noted that Ms. Sonenfeld seemed to be referring to the comment made in the newspaper last month by Councilman Sedon, and she was responding to that. Ms. Loving said she was referring to the statements about Ms. Sonenfeld’s salary, which Ms. Loving said sounded reasonable, because somehow the salary has increased by at least $100,000, and a position has been added. Ms. Loving thought the question was reasonable and asked in a fair manner, and she felt that Councilman Sedon was reprimanded for asking it.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, commented that currently, he is neither for nor against a parking garage. However, he stated that he does not want the public to be misinformed; not given enough information; or be misled when it comes to the projected cost for this facility. Mr. Loving recalled that he lived in the Village when Village Hall was planned, and the public was told that it would cost approximately $4.5 million. Mr. Loving said he does not know what the actual cost of the building was, because when the cost increased to $11 million, no information was given after that point. That was the last major expense incurred by the taxpayers, and Mr. Loving hopes that this time, when it comes to spending approximately $10 million or more, the public is given accurate figures.

Mr. Loving also pointed out that, in addition to the cost of the building, the taxpayers need to be informed in the referendum what the interest costs will be on the building. That will enable the taxpayers to see the whole picture, as opposed to only being informed about construction costs. He noted that none of the present Councilmembers were serving on the Village Council at that time, and at least two of them did not even live in Ridgewood at that time. Mr. Loving urged the Councilmembers as they move forward with this proposed referendum and the costs of the project to remember that the public be kept informed about actual costs, not guesswork.

Next, Mr. Loving recalled a comment made this evening to the effect that once the Village Council majority has decided, no further discussion is required. He noted that that was the second time he heard such a comment. Previously, it was uttered in a discussion about proposed sidewalks on Clinton Avenue. As Mr. Loving recalled, the comment was put in the form of a question like “Didn’t we vote on this already?” He pointed out that the Councilmembers have always given the impression that if something does not work, it can be tried again. Mr. Loving wanted to know how changes could be made in the future if no one asks questions about an issue, whether it has already been decided by the majority or not. Mr. Loving believes that just because the majority has decided, that does not mean the discussion must stop.

Councilwoman Hauck responded that she thinks there is a difference between waiting to see if something works, and perhaps re-doing it if necessary, and posing the same question three or four times in quick succession, which does not give democracy a chance. Once a question has been put to a vote, Councilwoman Hauck believes that everyone has a duty to see it through until it can be ascertained that it does not work, and then the issue can be discussed again, and the necessary steps can be taken to fix it. She emphasized that it is necessary to allow enough time to see if something works before recalling the question. Mr. Loving noted that, as has been seen on Clinton Avenue, a number of questions have arisen about that issue, and it was revisited. Therefore, Mr. Loving believes that to suggest that once something has been decided, no further discussion is needed, is inappropriate.

Louis Lembo, 721 Albert Place, stated that on Sunday, he returned from Wyckoff to his home, and it had rained quite heavily that day. Mr. Lembo pointed out that he lives at the very end of Albert Place, and there are no storm sewers on his street. Moreover, the road has been repaved infrequently over the years, and there is very little curbing left. The sidewalk in front of Mr. Lembo’s house, as well as the sidewalks in front of his neighbors’ houses, were covered with their mulch. Mr. Lembo thought at first that the river was high, but when he walked down there, he noticed that the pipe was clogged. He was under the impression that the pipe was supposed to be checked periodically by the Village to ensure that the pipe remains clear. Mr. Lembo mentioned that his street is approximately 800-1,000 feet from South Pleasant Avenue, and there is approximately a 20% grade, so that all the water rushes down his street to the Ho-Ho-Kus Brook. When the pipe gets clogged, it affects his street, especially the houses at the end closest to the brook. Mr. Lembo called the Village on Monday to get the pipe cleared, and it was cleared just enough to allow water to flow through. The mud is now nearly as high as the pipe, and Mr. Lembo thinks something more permanent must be done. At the very least, he urged the Village to keep an eye on the pipe to keep it clear. Ms. Sonenfeld stated that someone would look into it.

Paul Vagianos, 280 Rivera Court, noticed that the bond ordinance for the proposed Hudson Street parking garage was being discussed tonight, and he is aware that there is some support for the ordinance among the Councilmembers. Mr. Vagianos stated that on a personal level, he is very supportive of it, and the Chamber of Commerce is also very supportive of it. Building this garage is perhaps the most critical piece of infrastructure that the Village has embarked upon in the past 20 years, according to Mr. Vagianos. He can hear people talking about it at least 5-6 times per day, including residents, non-residents, customers, and former customers, who believe that if the parking problem is not fixed, Ridgewood will be in a very good situation. Mr. Vagianos commended the Councilmembers for embarking on this project, and he has worked with several Mayors and Village Managers, as well as two Village Attorneys and Ms. Mailander, over the years. Today was the first time he saw a Village Council that has the fortitude to take on this project. Mr. Vagianos also agreed with Mr. Loving that this is a huge project, perhaps even the biggest project the Village has undertaken in decades, if ever. It is imperative to ensure that the same kind of issue involving cost overruns that occurred with the building of Village Hall does not occur with the parking garage, because they are unacceptable. Mr. Vagianos believes it should be done well, and it should be done quickly. In addition, Mr. Vagianos stated that he heard it was to be put on a referendum, and he asked if that was true. Mayor Aronsohn answered that he proposed the idea tonight, and after discussion with the parking steering committee on Friday, it might be discussed again next week. He explained that he would like to put a non-binding referendum on the ballot in November to allow the public to give their input on this issue. Mayor Aronsohn commented that he has spoken to John Hogan, Bergen County Clerk, as well as the Deputy County Clerk and the Bergen League of Municipalities about this. The deadline to get the question on the referendum is August 14, 2015, so there is a lot of work ahead to get this ready to go. Mayor Aronsohn also explained that this non-binding referendum, with the proposed design of the garage, would be perfectly timed, because it would conceivably allow some kind of design in place as soon as October 1^st, to help inform any public discussions on the matter.

Councilman Pucciarelli believes that there was consensus that the $500,000 is necessary in doing a project of this type, because there is an expertise that must be brought to bear, and it is necessary to incur the soft costs needed to do that properly. The engineering and architectural studies can be done by experts in those fields, and should not be done in-house. Once the plan is produced, the public will know exactly what they will be paying for, with regard to the proposed parking garage. Councilman Pucciarelli said he is not very concerned about cost overruns due to the fact that the Village will be incurring the expenses necessary to get it right, by passing the bond ordinance.

Mr. Vagianos agrees that going forward, this is a great plan. A non-binding referendum will help give guidance to the Councilmembers regarding how the residents feel about this, while at the same time giving the Councilmembers the flexibility to do what they feel is best. He reiterated that he thinks that this is the right way to go.

There were no other comments from the public at this time, and Mayor Aronsohn closed the time for public comments.

8.         RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

The following resolution, numbered 15-151, to go into Closed Session, was read in full by the Village Clerk, as follows:

9.         ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilwoman Knudsen, seconded by Councilman Pucciarelli, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M.

                                                                               ________________________________

                                                                                                  Paul S. Aronsohn

                                                                                                          Mayor

_________________________________

            Heather A. Mailander

               Village Clerk

A REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURTROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2015, AT 8:00 P.M.

1.         CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE – MOMENT OF SILENCE

Mayor Aronsohn called the meeting to order at 8:01 P.M., and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call, the following were present: Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn. Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Clerk; Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; and Frank Moritz, Director of Ridgewood Water. Ms. Sonenfeld was absent.

Mayor Aronsohn led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. Mayor Aronsohn then asked for a moment of silence to honor the men and women in the United States Armed Forces who protect and defend our freedom every day, as well as those serving as first responders.

2.         ACCEPTANCE OF FINANCIAL REPORTS

Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Bills, Claims, and Vouchers, and Statement of Funds on hand as of May 31, 2015, be accepted as submitted. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.  

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

3.         APPROVAL OF MINUTES

There were no minutes to be approved this evening. There will be minutes considered for approval at the July 15, 2015, Public Meeting.

4.         PROCLAMATIONS

There were no proclamations this evening.

5.         COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Aronsohn said that recently, there were questions about how public comments are handled at Village Council meetings, compared to the procedures at Board of Education meetings, Planning Board meetings, and procedures in other communities. When Mayor Aronsohn joined the Village Council in 2008, public comments were only heard at the beginning of Village Council meetings, and each member of the public was restricted to three minutes. Several years later, at the suggestion of the late Roger Wiegand, a long-time resident and frequent participant at Village Council meetings, an additional opportunity for public comment, at three minutes per person, was added at the end of each Village Council meeting. Last year, the time limit was increased to five minutes per person, at the beginning and the end of each meeting. That is a bit more time than is allowed in other organizations and municipalities. Mayor Aronsohn stated that the Councilmembers believe that it enriches their discussions, and helps to inform their thinking on issues. That is why they encourage it. Sometimes, there are just a few who wish to speak, and at other times, there are a lot of people who wish to speak. Mayor Aronsohn noted that public comment is a time for comment, and every member of the public can come up to the microphone and speak on any issue, or ask general questions of the Village Council. He asked that, after making comments or posing questions, each member of the public should sit down, and if a Councilmember or the Village Manager, or some other Village personnel, wishes to respond, s/he will do so at that time. Mayor Aronsohn mentioned that there have been complaints that members of the public have been engaging in conversations for up to 5-10 minutes with Councilmembers, while other members of the public are waiting to make their comments.

George Shabet, 334 Lakeview Drive, drew the attention of the Councilmembers to King’s Pond Park, which is the largest wildscape in Ridgewood, and is still in deplorable condition. Mr. Shabet has described the condition of the park at length in meetings with the Village Manager, as well as with the Parks, Recreation, and Conservation Board (PRC), and he is still awaiting a response as to any anticipated actions that will be taken. He gave a brief review of the three major issues. The first is that the concrete dam built in 1968 has been deteriorating for a long time. Mr. Shabet first notified the Village of the deterioration in 1995, and again in 2007 and 2014. Next, the pond was last dredged in 1999, and Mr. Shabet first requested that the pond be dredged again in 2007, and he has repeatedly made that request since then. Finally, he noted that it is essential to remove the dense vegetation growth on the west shoreline that prevents access to the pond. The shoreline was free of vegetation until approximately 2007, when it was allowed to grow unchecked over the following eight years. Since May 2014, Mr. Shabet has met with Ms. Sonenfeld, Mayor Aronsohn, and the Village Council, yet to date, no commitment has been forthcoming. Mr. Shabet’s emails have remained unanswered. He pointed out that all of his requests are detailed in the Village Master Plan of 2006. In that Master Plan, everything Mr. Shabet has discussed over the past year is laid out with respect to each individual task and its cost. However, it is now nine years later, and no action has been taken.

Mr. Shabet tried a different approach this time. He asked the Councilmembers to use him as a “window” to King’s Pond Park. In 2006, anyone sitting on a bench in front of the pond could see along the entire length of the pond, which was free of vegetation. In the fall, the foliage of the trees was visible, and the colors of the leaves were reflected in the pond. Fish were visible as they were swimming approximately four inches below the surface. Flocks of geese would sometimes land on the pond. In the winter, people often skated on the ice, or played hockey. However, by 2014, the only thing visible at the pond is the overgrowth of vegetation. Mr. Shabet again requested that the dam be repaired; the pond be dredged; and the excess vegetation be removed. He asked the Councilmembers what their plan would be to restore the site to its original beauty.

Mayor Aronsohn responded that Ms. Sonenfeld has been working on a solution to that problem, but because she was not at the meeting, he could not say what information she might have.

Councilman Sedon noted the issues raised by Mr. Shabet, and thought the easiest one to address might be the overgrowth of vegetation, which could be cut back. However, he was told that there might be issues with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), because the vegetation is so close to the pond. That was the extent of the information Councilman Sedon received.

Councilwoman Hauck commented that she saw an email within the past month indicating that there might be some change in the NJDEP regulations regarding that area. She pointed out that the problem encountered with cutting back the vegetation was due to the fact that the Village had to get permission to cut back the vegetation, because although the Village does not want the vegetation to remain, the NJDEP believes that the vegetation prevents the geese from soiling the pond. There are many other rules and regulations that are not under the Village’s control, especially with respect to the weeds. Concerning the concrete dam, it was not in this year’s capital budget. However, it is still on a wish list of issues to be addressed.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked for information about how often the vegetation was being maintained prior to the overgrowth, and if the Village was maintaining it. She has not seen any emails from Mr. Shabet, except for possibly one of them, and she heard discussion at Village Council meetings, as well as at the budget meeting. Councilwoman Knudsen said she is interested in understanding how this was managed prior to the overgrowth of vegetation. Mr. Shabet responded that it was not being managed, and it was not growing. He believes that something happened that caused the tremendous growth of bamboo and other weeds, and no one has made any attempt to cut any of it back. If it had been maintained, as it was before, they would not be any issue at this time.

Councilman Pucciarelli noted that Mr. Shabet mentioned bamboo, and asked if there is definitely bamboo growing in the area. Mr. Shabet confirmed that there is a lot of bamboo, and he cut down a section of it so that he could see the dam from his living room. He is not sure whether that was legal, but he pointed out that if he had not cut any of the bamboo/vegetation down, no one would be able to access the pond at this time for fishing, ice skating, or any other activities. Councilman Pucciarelli added that the bamboo is particularly insidious, and requires constant cutting back. Mr. Shabet said that going forward, he will send a picture to the newspapers to allow everyone to see what the area looks like when it is not maintained. Councilman Pucciarelli suggested that cutting out the bamboo completely might alleviate most of the problem with vegetation, but it would require a backhoe to dig out the roots.

Councilwoman Hauck commented that with respect to Mr. Shabet’s point that the Administration must show an interest in doing something about the problem in order to begin any efforts to do so, Nancy Bigos, Assistant Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation, suggested that the next PRC meeting should be held at King’s Pond Park. The meeting will be a “picnic dinner”. Councilwoman Hauck invited all of the other Councilmembers to attend. The meeting will be on Tuesday, June 23^rd, at 7:30 P.M.

Jim Griffith, 159 South Irving Street, commented that he went over the budget presentation this past week. Mr. Griffith found it fascinating that the presentation included everything that was going to be done, which was stated in writing. He particularly commended the idea of the bond ordinance to have the money ready when needed to support the parking garage. Mr. Griffith intended to come to this meeting to praise the Councilmembers for finally getting serious about the parking issue, and having everything necessary lined up. However, Mr. Griffith just learned that the vote that was taken was not sufficient to pass the bond ordinance, because a supermajority is required in order to adopt a bond ordinance. He asked if there is anything at this time that blocks the Councilmembers from continuing with the activities outlined in the budget presentation. Mayor Aronsohn answered that the project is still moving forward, although he confirmed that with respect to bond ordinances, it is necessary to have at least four of

the Councilmembers vote in favor of it. Mayor Aronsohn also noted that the vote has not yet been taken on the bond ordinance, but it will be taken tonight.

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, mentioned that a Ridgewood resident, Anita Boyle, passed away recently. Ms. Boyle and her husband, Gerard Glade Boyle, were active in Ridgewood politics for many years. They attended Village Council meetings on a regular basis, and spoke against the Mayor and Village Manager when proper procedures were not followed. They established a taxpayers’ group to encourage residents to become involved in the community. Mr. Boyle passed away in 2003, and Ms. Loving wanted to acknowledge her passing, because many Ridgewood residents knew the couple.

Regarding the April 8^th Village Council minutes, Ms. Loving said she did not understand the comments made by Mayor Aronsohn. Mayor Aronsohn explained that the Councilmembers were scheduled to vote on the approval of those minutes tonight, but one of the Councilmembers requested more time to read the document.

Sally Brandes, 515 Stevens Avenue, stated that she attended several of the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC) meetings with respect to the installation of a stop sign at Corella Court, and the elimination of parking on half of Corella Court. At the end of the last meeting, the conclusion was that a stop sign would be installed, and the Village would provide parking at the rear of Hawes School, which has been done. It was decided that the CSAC and they Village would wait to see if that alleviated the staff parking problem at the school before parking was permanently eliminated on Corella Court. Ms. Brandes spoke with Ms. Sonenfeld briefly last week, and Ms. Sonenfeld mentioned that although seven additional spaces were provided, the staff was still continuing to park on Corella Court. Ms. Sonenfeld stated that she would be speaking to Dr. Daniel Fishbein, Superintendent of Schools, about the situation. Ms. Brandes noted that her conversation with Dr. Fishbein apparently had some effect, because for a while, there were approximately four cars belonging to staff members that were parking on Corella Court, and sometimes as many as seven cars parking there. However, Ms. Brandes noted that the spaces behind Hawes School remained empty, in direct correlation to the number of cars parking on Corella Court. Ms. Brandes reminded the Councilmembers that the original problem resulted from staff members at Hawes School parking all day on Corella Court, preventing residents on that street from being able to have guests in their homes and park on the street, or even to have service vehicles come to perform services in their homes. Ms. Brandes believes the solution is simple, and that is to do what was done on South Pleasant Avenue, which runs parallel to Stevens Avenue, and Houston Lane, which runs in front of Hawes School: installing No Parking” signs prohibiting parking from 8:00-9:00 A.M. That forces staff members to use the spaces provided at the rear of the school. It would also allow the taxpayers of Corella Court to use their street. In addition, it would alleviate the problem of forcing parents to back up onto Stevens Avenue, which was another problem because Stevens Avenue is a narrow street, and dangerous driving situations are created by the traffic that results from the cars that are backing up on that street. A stop sign does not necessarily help the problem, because it simply prohibits people from parking within 50 feet of the sign. That is also the same side of the road where parking would be permitted, and it will cause more parking congestion in front of the houses there. Ms. Brandes believes that installing “No Parking” signs prohibiting parking during specific hours would be a far better solution, because they are evidently working on the streets where they are currently installed. The parents who park their cars in the afternoon to wait for their children to be picked up do not remain very long, and they do not leave their vehicles. Most of the parking problems at this time are being caused by staff members’ vehicles. Ms. Brandes requested that the Councilmembers consider her comments.

Monroe Bernold, 500 Corella Court, stated that he is the person who is most affected by the parking situation on Corella Court. Mr. Bernold has been involved in this argument for the past three years. He disagrees with just about everything Ms. Brandes stated. Mr. Bernold’s street is the closest to Hawes School. He noted that Corella Court is as narrow as Stevens Avenue, and the residents on Corella Court deserve, at a minimum, what every other narrow street near a school in Ridgewood has had, which is that no parking is allowed on one side of the street. There are approximately 6-7 cars parked on Corella Court all day during the school year, and they interfere with Mr. Bernold’s driveway. The stop sign will allow Mr. Bernold to get out of his driveway. The police have visited Corella Court regularly over the past several years, and are in agreement that it is a safety problem, as well as a service problem. Twice in the past two years, when Village vehicles have come to remove the leaves, which they do before 8:00 A.M., they pile the leaves into 15-foot-high piles on the street. However, they have not been able to remove the leaves, because several people park their cars right next to the leaves on either side, as well as across the street, impeding access to the leaves for removal. In 2014, Mr. Bernold pointed out that it took two months, during which time he called everyone he could think of in the Village, to get the leaves removed. They were finally removed during the Christmas break because there were no cars present. Mr. Bernold presented pictures of Corella Court under various conditions, including when it snows, to demonstrate impediments posed by cars parking on the street. These include prohibiting all emergency, public service, and delivery vehicles from entering the street. Mr. Bernold mentioned that it only requires 4-5 cars to be parked on the street for this to become a problem.

In addition, Mr. Bernold pointed out that Corella Court should be treated like any other street that is close to a school. All such streets do not have restrictions on parking between 8:00 A.M.-9:00 A.M., and if the Village wanted to enforce such a restriction, Mr. Bernold said it would continue to place him in the unenviable position in which he has found himself for the past three years, and that is being constantly forced to call on the Ridgewood Police Department. Mr. Bernold does not believe that the Police Department wants to issue tickets to teachers.

Furthermore, Mr. Bernold commented that very few cars park north of Corella Court on Stevens Avenue. This was true even when Hawes School was closed for construction. The teachers tend to park their cars on Houston Lane, on the southern part of South Pleasant Avenue, or on Corella Court, because those are the shortest routes to the back entrance of Hawes School. Mr. Bernold believes that Ms. Brandes has no cause for complaint, because she lives on the street on which parking is only allowed on one side.

Mr. Bernold mentioned that his original request to Christopher Rutishauser, Village Engineer, was to limit parking on Corella Court to one side of the street. The only issue on which he agrees with Ms. Brandes is regarding the school parking. Mr. Bernold noted that there are two parking lots for Hawes School, one of which is close to Corella Court, and the other behind the school.

Mayor Aronsohn noted that Mr. Bernold had run out of time to speak, and he added that the issue is on the agenda for this evening, and the ordinance will be adopted. However, the situation will continue to be monitored and revisited to ensure that whatever action is taken will work.

Councilman Sedon stated that he thinks the idea presented by Ms. Brandes is workable, because it could alleviate the teachers’ parking issue. If the current restrictions could be maintained, and an additional parking restriction as suggested by Ms. Brandes could be implemented, it might force the teachers to use the available spaces at the school.

Frank Siccardi, 520 Stevens Avenue, commented that he is aware that the groundwork has been done for the installation of the stop sign. He reminded everyone that Corella Court is a cul-de-sac with a dead-end, and there is only approximately 250 feet leading to the cul-de-sac. Mr. Siccardi does not believe a stop sign is necessary at that location, but he will not oppose the installation of one at that point. However, he disagreed with Mr. Bernold’s observations, because Mr. Siccardi noted that cars are parked in front of his house. Starting at approximately 2:30 P.M. every day, people park their cars in front of his house and along Stevens Avenue as they wait to pick up their children.

The other issue Mr. Siccardi wanted to discuss was that the ordinance includes language to the effect that the parking restrictions would be year-round, but he noted that the only time there is a parking problem is during school hours, when schools are open. Mr. Siccardi believes it is a drastic step to prohibit people from parking on the cul-de-sac when school is not in session, such as in the summer, on weekends, and school holidays, because there is no parking problem at such times. Limiting the parking ordinance to school hours will allow residents in that area to have guests in their homes without having to worry about parking restrictions for their guests. Mr. Siccardi pointed out that the majority of the people living in that area do not agree with the various restrictions that have been proposed and implemented, but they are a silent majority.

There were no other comments from the public at this time, and Mayor Aronsohn closed the time for public comment.

6.         MANAGER’S REPORT

There was no Manager’s Report this evening.

7.         COUNCIL REPORTS

Fourth of July Committee – Councilwoman Knudsen commented that the Fourth of July Committee met this past Monday evening at the Ridgewood Firehouse. The Committee continues to solicit volunteers for the parade and fireworks, and it is hoped that people will step up as parade marshals, or for the evening program. All volunteers will receive a Fourth of July T-shirt, as well as a free ticket to the evening entertainment and fireworks. As a non-profit, the Committee will also be offering community service hours to any students who volunteer. Anyone interested in volunteering should contact the Fourth of July Committee via Facebook or at www.ridgewoodjuly4th.com, or by attending a volunteer meeting on Wednesday, July 1^st, at 7:30 P.M. at the firehouse. The Ridgewood Fourth of July Committee is an all-volunteer organization supported by private donations. Anyone who has difficulty connecting with the Fourth of July Committee can email Councilwoman Knudsen, and she said she would forward the email to the necessary people.

In addition, the Councilmembers and Village Manager are in need of convertibles for the parade. Ms. Mailander is currently researching the availability of convertibles, but if anyone is willing to donate his/her car and driving or chauffeur services, s/he should contact either Councilwoman Knudsen or Ms. Mailander via email. Their email addresses are available on the Village website. Councilwoman Knudsen noted that she has her own convertible.

Historic Preservation Commission – Councilwoman Knudsen mentioned that the Historic Preservation Commission will meet in the Garden Room tomorrow evening at 8:00 P.M. Currently, there are several applications before the Commission, including signage applications for various businesses in the CBD. The Commission will also review the historic component for the Master Plan re-examination.

Planning Board– Councilwoman Knudsen noted that the Planning Board will meet on Tuesday, June 16^th, at 7:30 P.M. The agenda includes the continuation of the Master Plan re-examination. However, Councilwoman Knudsen pointed out that with respect to the Planning Board vote to the amendment to the Master Plan for the CBD high-density housing, many residents have asked whether this is the final step to be taken, and whether construction will begin immediately once the vote is taken. Councilwoman Knudsen explained that the Planning Board must first memorialize any vote taken by resolution. After that, barring any appeals, the Village Council will consider whether to adopt the amendment to the Master Plan by introducing zoning ordinances applied to each of the new zones, and adopting those ordinances by a majority vote. It is all a part of the process and is moving forward, but there is still a lot of work ahead.

Finally, Councilwoman Knudsen pointed out an article in the June 5^th edition of the Bergen Record by Chris Harris, entitled “Ridgewood Council Considers Adding Garage Referendum”. After reading the article, Councilwoman Knudsen felt compelled to address it and correct it. The quote states that the Village Council is considering adding a non-binding referendum to the November ballot to gauge support for the parking garage in the CBD. It also states that the referendum was the “brainchild” of Mayor Aronsohn, who was quoted as saying that adding this issue to the General Election ballot will cost the Village nothing. The article also states that Councilman Pucciarelli, Councilwoman Hauck, and Councilman Sedon support Mayor Aronsohn’s idea to get feedback from voters, and that the idea was “not well received” by Councilwoman Knudsen. Councilwoman Knudsen commented that she wanted to correct that statement, because not only was the idea well-received by her, but she also suggested that the referendum go further and include the proposed assisted living facility at the North Walnut Street Redevelopment Zone. Councilwoman Knudsen believes that because it is a parcel of property owned by Village residents, it is incumbent upon the Councilmembers to engage the public by asking them to weigh in on such issues. When Councilwoman Knudsen read the article, she was not sure whether it was a misrepresentation or oversight, and she wanted to make it clear that she not only supports the non-binding referendum, but she believes it should go much further, by making it a binding referendum.

Ridgewood Arts Council– Councilman Pucciarelli mentioned that anyone who donates a convertible for use in the Fourth of July parade will get that convertible back, but anyone who donates art to the Ridgewood Arts Council will not. The Ridgewood Arts Council is looking for art donations, which will become the property of the Village and will be displayed. It is hoped that enough art can be acquired to rotate the pieces throughout Village buildings. Donated art can include photography, sculpture, paintings, or other media.

Bergen LEADS – Councilman Pucciarelli commented that he heard the end of the Teen LEADS presentation at Village Hall just prior to the Ridgewood Arts Council meeting that he attended last week. Yesterday, he attended the Adult Bergen LEADS meeting at Bergen Community College, and he found it fascinating. The topic was “Revitalizing Our Suburban Downtowns,” and 28 adults participated in the presentation. The presentation can be viewed on the Bergen LEADS website. The demographic information was fascinating. Councilman Pucciarelli learned that Bergen County is larger in population than nine states. The population declined in the 1960s and 1970s, when what is known as “white flight” occurred from the cities, which also caused emigration from the inner suburbs close to New York City to places like Sussex County and beyond. Most of those counties are now losing population, while Bergen County is again gaining in population. In addition, Bergen County’s current population is very different from that of the 1950s through the 1980s. Everyone who left did not return to Bergen County, and the millennials represent smaller numbers than before, because they usually want to live in the inner city. When looking at the demographics, the implications suggest that community activities must be responsive to any demographic changes. Councilman Pucciarelli stated that he is not advocating for any particular position, but he thinks the data is worth studying. It can be found on the Bergen LEADS website.

CBD Forum– Councilman Pucciarelli noted that the next CBD forum is scheduled for Wednesday, June 17^th, at 7:30 P.M. As he mentioned in his previous CBD Forum report, a representative from Parkmobile will be present to demonstrate how to download and use the app, so anyone who has had any problems with the app might want to try to attend. Councilman Pucciarelli commented that he has used the app, and he finds it very easy to use, as well as convenient. In addition, Bob Rooney, Chief Financial Officer/Director of the Parking Utility; and Janet Fricke, Assistant to the Village Manager, will also be in attendance to discuss many changes that have occurred with parking in the Village. Ms. Fricke will also give an update about the progress of making Parkmobile available at all parking meters. There will also be a discussion about the proposed parking garage, and an open mic forum for people to discuss whatever is on their minds with respect to the CBD.

Councilwoman Hauck reminded everyone that tomorrow is the end of the year picnic for the Highlights in Leisure Time (HILT) group. She encouraged anyone over age 55 to join the group. It currently has 115 members, and they meet on the second Thursday of each month in the Senior Center in Village Hall. Their activities include entertainment presentations and discussions with coffee and snacks. Attendance at the end of the year picnic is expected to be approximately 75 people at Graydon Pool, and they plan to have a luau, including hula dancing.

Shade Tree Commission – Councilman Sedon commented that the Shade Tree Commission met last night. They accessed several lists of people who are hoping to replace trees in front of their homes after waiting for a number of years. The Commission sent out 215 letters to residents explaining the adopt-a-tree program, and the deadline is set for June 15, 2015, for anyone to respond with any interest in participating in the program. Once it is known how many people are interested, a bid proposal will be drafted to determine when the trees can be planted. The Commission members expect approximately 20 responses. The price has traditionally been between $300-$400 to plant one tree, and anyone who does not want to wait for the Village to plant the tree could certainly do it on his/her own. Councilman Sedon also stated that the Shade Tree Commission website is now available, and can be googled. More information and content will be added. Councilman Sedon thanked Dylan Hansen, Systems Administrator, for assisting with the development of the website, and all of the members of the Shade Tree Commission who helped add content to the website.

Ridgewood Green Team – Councilman Sedon stated that the Green Team has not met, but they plan to do so. They have submitted their application to Sustainable Jersey, and have documented 260 points worth of actions and submitted them to the State. Bronze level certification for any grants available through this program requires 150 points, while the silver level requires 350 points. There is a process that is followed between the first submission and the final determination in November, with information being exchanged, and there is ample time for that. The number of points Ridgewood currently has gives enough of a cushion to believe that at least 150 of the points will be accepted by Sustainable Jersey. That will open the Village to various grants on green and environmentally sound initiatives. Councilman Sedon thanked Janet Fricke for helping to organize a lot of this information over the years; Christopher Rutishauser, Village Engineer, who has been instrumental in helping and guiding the Green Team through the process, as well as getting information; Jiffy Vermylen, the Chairperson of the Ridgewood Green Team, who has helped to organize all of the information; and the rest of the Green Team for all of their assistance and efforts.

Planning Board– Mayor Aronsohn recalled that Councilwoman Sedon mentioned the multi-family housing issue, which will soon be coming to the Village Council for discussion and action. To facilitate that process and keep everyone aware of what is happening, the Planning Board has a website portal dedicated to all of the exhibits and information shared during the hearing process, as well as the video from the meeting last week. The transcripts will also be made available online.

Councilman Pucciarelli pointed out that when the issue comes back to the Village Council, it is not for the Councilmembers to reconsider the amendment to the Master Plan, because the Village Council does not have that authority. The Planning Board is responsible for the Master Plan. The amendments to the Master Plan are converted into zoning ordinance amendments for the Village Council’s consideration and approval.

8.         ORDINANCES

a.         Introduction – #3479 – Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Valet Loading and Unloading Zones – Chestnut Street and Prospect Street

Mayor Aronsohn moved the first reading of Ordinance 3479. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3479 by title:

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-29, “PARKING METER ZONES DESIGNATED,” AND AT SECTION 265-72, SCHEDULE XXII “LOADING ZONES”

Councilman Pucciarelli moved that Ordinance 3479 be adopted on first reading and that July 15, 2015, be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

b.         Introduction – #3480 – Bond Ordinance – Pre-Construction Funding for Hudson Street Parking Garage

Mayor Aronsohn moved the first reading of Ordinance 3480. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3480 by title:

BOND ORDINANCE PROVIDING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF $500,000 FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND LAND SURVEYING SERVICES FOR THE PARKING UTILITY IN AND BY THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, NEW JERSEY, AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $500,000 BONDS OR NOTES OF THE VILLAGE FOR FINANCING THE APPROPRIATION

Councilwoman Knudsen moved that Ordinance 3480 be adopted on first reading and that July 15, 2015, be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. She stated that she was making the motion, although there are still some questions to be answered, which hopefully will be resolved before taking the next step. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

c.         Introduction – #3481 – Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Angle         and Parallel Parking Regulations

Mayor Aronsohn moved the second reading of Ordinance 3481 and that the Public Hearing be opened. Councilwoman Hauck seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3481 by title:

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-25, “ANGLE PARKING”

Councilman Pucciarelli moved that Ordinance 3481 be adopted on first reading and that July 15, 2015, be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilwoman Hauck seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

d.         Introduction – #3482 – Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Taxi Stands and Bus Stops

Mayor Aronsohn moved the second reading of Ordinance 3482 and that the Public Hearing be opened. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3482 by title:

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-27 “TAXI STANDS,” AND SECTION 265-28, “BUS STOPS”

Councilman Sedon moved that Ordinance 3482 be adopted on first reading and that July 15, 2015, be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

e.         Introduction – #3483 – Amend Chapter 3 – Administration of Government

Mayor Aronsohn moved the second reading of Ordinance 3483 and that the Public Hearing be opened. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:Councilman Sedon

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3483 by title:

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE V OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD ENTITLED “DEPARTMENTS”

Councilwoman Hauck moved that Ordinance 3483 be adopted on first reading and that July 15, 2015, be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Pucciarelli, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:Councilmembers Knudsen and Sedon

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

f.          Introduction – #3484 – Amend Various Salary Ordinances

Mayor Aronsohn moved the second reading of Ordinance 3484 and that the Public Hearing be opened. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Pucciarelli, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:Councilmembers Knudsen and Sedon

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3484 by title:

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SALARY ORDINANCE 3397 FIXING THE SALARIES, WAGES, AND OTHER COMPENSATION FOR WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEES; AND TO AMEND SALARY ORDINANCE 3398 FIXING SALARIES, WAGES, AND OTHER COMPENSATION OF AND FOR THE BLUE-COLLAR EMPLOYEES; AND TO AMEND SALARY ORDINANCE 3437 FIXING SALARIES, WAGES, AND OTHER COMPENSATION OF AND FOR THE SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES; AND TO AMEND SALARY ORDINANCE 3444, FIXING SALARIES, WAGES, AND OTHER COMPENSATION, AND TO ESTABLISH THE “EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT” OF CERTAIN NON-UNION EMPLOYEES OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, COUNTY OF BERGEN, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Councilwoman Hauck moved that Ordinance 3484 be adopted on first reading and that July 15, 2015, be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Pucciarelli seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Pucciarelli, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:Councilmembers Knudsen and Sedon

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

g.         Public Hearing – #3478 – Amend Chapter 265 – Vehicles and Traffic – Corella Court – Stop Sign and Parking Restrictions

Mayor Aronsohn moved the second reading of Ordinance 3478 and that the Public Hearing be opened. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3478 by title:

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-59, SCHEDULE IX “STOP INTERSECTIONS,” AND SECTION 265-65, “PARKING PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES”

Mayor Aronsohn announced that the Public Hearing was open.

Sally Brandes, 515 Stevens Avenue, stated that her previous comments are true, and she does not want to change anything that she stated before. Ms. Brandes pointed out that she is one of the few people living on Stevens Avenue who can truly say that she is not protesting the proposed parking plan because she does not want people parking around her house. Ms. Brandes noted that she has ample parking all around her, because her garages are at the rear of her house, allowing her to pull out of her driveway in a forward motion, without needing to backup, as her neighbors do. She added that perhaps Mr. Bernold thinks there is a silent majority, but Ms. Brandes knows at least four people who wrote letters to Mr. Rutishauser opposing the proposed ordinance. There are only six homes on Corella Court. Moreover, Ms. Brandes and her husband previously stated that Corella Court is five feet wider than Stevens Avenue. The portion of Stevens Avenue that is closer to the school, where parking is allowed, is a newer section of Stevens Avenue, and is a bit wider than the rest of the street.

Ms. Brandes noted that the discussion started some years ago when one of the residents who lived on the corner of Stevens Avenue and Houston Lane complained to Mr. Rutishauser that she could not get out of her driveway when cars were parked there. A study was done, and the Village Engineer found that when there were leaves on Stevens Avenue, with a garbage truck coming through and cars parked on the other side of the street, it was impossible to open doors when traffic was present. A member of the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee who was trying to drive through that area under those conditions discovered the same thing.

Ms. Brandes reiterated that she is not asking for parking to be completely removed from Stevens Avenue, but she is asking that safe parking be provided for school staff and parents, as well as adequate parking for her neighbors along Stevens Avenue. Ms. Brandes believes that installing a stop sign and allowing parking only on one side of the street is “rewarding” school staff for not using the spaces provided at Hawes School. The proposed plan essentially designates spaces that can be used by school staff all day long. Ms. Brandes also believes that the only way to encourage school staff to use the new spaces at Hawes School is by prohibiting parking along Stevens Avenue during school arrival time, between 8:00 A.M.-9:00 A.M. That will give the parents safe places to park because they will be able to park on Corella Court, instead of parking their cars right up to the corners in that area as was shown in the pictures.

Councilman Pucciarelli asked how installing the stop sign on Corella Court “rewards” school staff by allowing them to park in that area. Ms. Brandes explained that the stop sign will be placed on Corella Court, on the same side of the street where parking is to be allowed. Corella Court is a very short street, and cars must park at least 50 feet from the stop sign. Parking will only be allowed approximately half way around the cul-de-sac. There are driveways on the cul-de-sac, which Ms. Brandes estimates might allow a maximum of seven cars to park there, but she believes a more realistic number is five. She noted that there always seems to be enough spaces for school staff to park on Corella Court, and they can still park their cars in the wider section of Stevens Avenue. Ms. Brandes does not know why school staff members do not park their cars on the wider section of Stevens Avenue.

Monroe Bernold, 500 Corella Court, wished to clarify his position. He noted that Corella Court is shaped like a key, with a narrow portion that opens up into a circle where there is parking. Mr. Bernold acknowledged that the majority of residents on Corella Court sent letters to Mr. Rutishauser, which Mr. Bernold saw, supporting all of this. According to Mr. Bernold, their only objection had to do with what was planned for Stevens Avenue. One of those four residents has now retracted his letter, and took it up with Ms. Sonenfeld, stating that he now supports this ordinance. As far as the stop sign is concerned, Mr. Bernold commented that the stop sign was installed because he is the only resident on Corella Court whose house is in the narrow part of the street, before the cul-de-sac at the end. His house is on the corner, and until now, there was a line painted 25 feet from the corner, in accordance with New Jersey Statute. However, because 25 feet from the corner is the middle of Mr. Bernold’s driveway, the line is painted six feet past his driveway. When the stop sign is installed, the only actual loss is three feet, due to the allowance for Mr. Bernold’s driveway. That will only eliminate one car from the number of cars that currently park there.

Due to the presence of the school, the parking situation Ms. Brandes was referring to in the afternoon occurs when the parents come and line up their cars to wait for their children. Mr. Bernold has lived there for 43 years, and he recalled that there used to be no cars in that area, because parents allowed their children to walk to school. Now, every morning for approximately 15 minutes, there is a traffic jam on Corella Court. The same thing occurs every afternoon at around 3:00 P.M. The traffic jam is so bad that when Mr. Bernold tried to come down Stevens Avenue at 3:15 P.M. and access his driveway, he could not do that, because people park in his driveway. Mr. Bernold never objected to this, because it only lasts for 15 minutes twice a day.

As far as Corella Court is concerned, Mr. Bernold noted that Mr. Siccardi does not really use Corella Court, although his house borders it. This is because Mr. Siccardi’s driveway is on Stevens Avenue. Mr. Bernold stated that he is the only one whose driveway is affected on a daily basis by the parking situation on Corella Court. If the cars are allowed to park across the street from him, that creates another problem, because he and his wife risk hitting one of those cars when pulling out of their driveway. Mr. Bernold stated emphatically that the stop sign has been installed for one reason only, and that is to prevent people from parking so close to his driveway, and to allow Mr. Bernold and his family to get their cars in and out of the driveway. Mr. Bernold estimates that the number of cars that can park on Corella Court is 7-8 cars, because the cul-de-sac is wide enough to accommodate that many. The Board of Education painted seven spots at the school, and the number of cars parking on Corella Court has decreased to 6-7 cars most of the time. Mr. Bernold commented that if the Village Council does not do something to prohibit parking on Corella Court, he will be put in the position of constantly calling the Police Department to have them to get all of those cars. Mr. Bernold concluded by stating that the only people objecting to this ordinance are a couple of residents on Stevens Avenue.

Mayor Aronsohn stated that the Councilmembers heard Mr. Bernold’s position, as well as Ms. Brandes’ position, and the Councilmembers were ready to move forward with this issue.

Frank Siccardi, 520 Stevens Avenue, pointed out that in one area in front of his house, people do park at the corner. He believes that painting a line just past his driveway would eliminate some of the parking on the corner. Mr. Siccardi said he requested this from Mr. Rutishauser via numerous telephone calls, but he has received no response. As far as Corella Court is concerned, Mr. Siccardi disagrees with a number of points raised by Mr. Bernold. Mr. Siccardi noted that his daughter comes to visit him, and she is afraid to park her car on Corella Court for fear of being harassed by Mr. Bernold, which has happened in the past. As a result, she parks in Mr. Siccardi’s driveway, and he parks his car on Corella Court, although he has been told not to do that by Mr. Bernold.

There were no other comments from the public, and Mayor Aronsohn moved that the Public Hearing be closed. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

Councilwoman Knudsen stated that she heard a lot of information from the residents who spoke, and she requested that this matter be tabled if possible. She noted that letters were sent to Mr. Rutishauser, which she has never seen, and she does not know if anyone else has seen them. She asked if Councilman Sedon had anything to add from the perspective of the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee, especially given the fact that it seems to be their understanding that the Village Council would proceed with authorizing installation of a stop sign and the new parking spaces, and re-assessing the situation after that occurred.

Councilman Sedon explained that the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee recommended passing the ordinance, as well as painting the yellow lines on the curbs. Councilman Sedon acknowledged that Ms. Brandes had a very good recommendation when she suggested prohibiting parking from 8:00 A.M.-9:00 A.M., and Councilman Sedon thinks that might help to clear the street, and residents would be able to park in the open parking spaces, instead of the teachers. However, he thought that making that change might be too substantive to do so at this time, which Mayor Aronsohn confirmed.

Mayor Aronsohn believes that placing parking restrictions, as suggested by Ms. Brandes, is something that could be discussed going forward. He pointed out that there is a public safety issue in that area at this time, especially with respect to allowing vehicles to move along that road. Some of the key issues have been addressed, including getting the parking spaces at Hawes School. Mayor Aronsohn said he would like to move forward with the ordinance. It will require monitoring, and it can be amended in the future to get it right.

Councilman Pucciarelli commented that he would have preferred that everyone could support this solution, but it must move forward. He believes the stop sign is useful and helps to alleviate the safety issue. Councilman Pucciarelli acknowledged that this is an imperfect solution, and he supports it on the basis that the issue be revisited. Although many people are unhappy with the proposed solution, Councilman Pucciarelli believes that doing nothing would be worse. Councilman Sedon said he would be happy to put it on the agenda for the next Citizens Safety Advisory Committee meeting, so that they can discuss the possibility of restricting parking in the morning to allow parents to drop their children off for school. Mayor Aronsohn added that hopefully, more parking will become available at Hawes School.

Councilwoman Knudsen asked about the suggestion Ms. Brandes put forth regarding limiting parking to one hour in the morning, which seems more logical to Councilwoman Knudsen. Mayor Aronsohn pointed out that there is still the issue of creating a wide enough passageway for public safety vehicles and other service vehicles to go down that street, which the parking restriction would not solve.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

Councilman Sedon moved that Ordinance 3478 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law. Councilwoman Knudsen seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hauck, Knudsen, Pucciarelli, Sedon, and Mayor Aronsohn

NAYS:None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

9.         RESOLUTIONS

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 15-152 THROUGH 15-176, WERE ADOPTED BY A CONSENT AGENDA, WITH ONE VOTE BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, AND WERE READ BY TITLE ONLY:

10.       COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Aronsohn stated that they would again have comments from the public and asked anyone wishing to address the Village Council to come forward.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, had a message that he wanted to share. He recalled that Mayor Aronsohn stated that there was always a period at the Public Meetings to provide comments at the end, and what was added was a second option during Work Sessions only. Mr. Loving also recalled with respect to the extra two minutes that were added for public comments that a member of the public looked at the Village Code, which indicated that it should be five minutes, not three minutes per person. That information was brought to the attention of Ms. Mailander, and she made the adjustment.

Sally Brandes, 515 Stevens Avenue, urged the Councilmembers to paint the curbs yellow, or paint a line to indicate that people should not park so close to the stop sign. Although the law states that people are not to park within 25 feet of a stop sign, it is constantly abused, and has become a safety issue. She reiterated that the majority of people who are breaking the law are school staff members.

There were no more comments from the public, and Mayor Aronsohn closed the time for public comment.

11.       RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

The following resolution, numbered 15-177, to go into Closed Session, was read in full by the Village Clerk, as follows:

12.       ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilwoman Hauck, seconded by Councilwoman Knudsen, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the meeting was adjourned at 9:35 P.M.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    _____________________________

                                                                                                Paul S. Aronsohn

                                                                                                          Mayor

_________________________________

            Heather A. Mailander

                Village Clerk