A REGULAR WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY ON APRIL 5, 2017 AT 7:30 P.M.

1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 7:34 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call, the following were present: Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen. Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; and Donna M. Jackson, Deputy Village Clerk.  

Mayor Knudsen led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and held a Moment of Silence for all the men and women serving our nation and all first responders.

2. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Knudsen asked if there were any comments or questions from the public.

Bridget Kong, 69 Sherman Place, stated that upon review of notes from the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC), she determined that there was no traffic study completed on Pomander Walk prior to the parking ban. There was no police study conducted nor any recommendation received by the Police Department prior to the parking ban. There was one accident in the last 10 years when a resident hit a tree in their own driveway, irrespective of the parking issue. There were no reports from the Engineering Department to support the parking ban.   CSAC recommended enforcement of the existing restrictions. CSAC never determined there to be a verifiable safety concern other than those voiced by the residents. CSAC cited operational considerations for leaf and snow removal as reasons for removing one-side-of-the-street parking; however, residents declined such a remedy. No evidence of a legitimate service issue or operational concern requiring parking modifications was expressed by either Village or outside professionals involved in the removal of snow, garbage, leaves, or recycling. Pomander Walk is a 50’ wide street and is wider than many streets in town that have parking in place and are successfully serviced during garbage and snow removal. Pomander Walk residents continue to demonstrate that they need parking for themselves, their guests, and service workers. A new and greater safety concern has been created by the ban on Pomander Walk, as the ban forces cars to park on the north side, and increases pedestrian traffic to cross Godwin Avenue, a known dangerous intersection. Two separate pedestrian-versus-car accidents have occurred in the last six months while pedestrians crossed Godwin Avenue in a designated crosswalk. Businesses have suffered economically, as legal parking spots were eliminated for their customers. Cars that previously parked on Pomander Walk are pushed to nearby streets such as Sherman Place, which cannot support the increased volume due to its own physical limitations and hazards on the street. Ms. Kong felt the parking ban on Pomander Walk was indefensible, given any of these eleven facts individually. Together they demonstrate an overwhelming, unreasonable hardship on all but a handful of Pomander Walk residents who have voiced concerns, declined all but the most extreme remediation, and have no basis for their claims. The suggestion that residents on neighboring streets should meet over coffee and resolve this issue is preposterous, as residents do not have the authority, guidance or expertise to evaluate concerns. Ms. Kong asked the Village Council to consider a temporary repeal of the parking ban until a thorough study and evaluation of the parking safety concerns and parking needs can be conducted.  

Russell Forenza, 228 Emmett Place, spoke about the water restrictions currently in place. He did not feel that new condominiums or townhouses should be built in any of the towns serviced by Ridgewood Water, as this would negatively impact the amount of water available to existing residents, who are already under water restrictions. He felt that the Village must find new sources of water before permitting new construction. He urged the creation of an ad hoc committee to look into this issue.

Karen Bagdon, 23 Pomander Walk, stated that the No Parking Ordinance on Pomander Walk has solved the residents’ safety issues previously expressed. The Sherman Place residents keep insisting that the ordinance negatively effects safety, which is simply not the case. Sherman Place and Pomander Walk have different safety concerns because the streets are completely different. Vehicles parked along Sherman Place are not necessarily vehicles that previously parked on Pomander Walk. Ms. Bagdon asked the Village Council to consider these points when deciding on this issue.

Cynthia Halaby, 374 Evergreen Place, stated that she was here this evening as President of the Conservancy for Ridgewood Public Lands (CFRPL). Ms. Halaby reported on the activities of the CFRPL. Yesterday, “Ben and Jerry” very generously donated the proceeds of their Free Cone Day. These funds will be used to start a Sensory and Butterfly Garden at the Stable. The CFRPL will make a presentation to the Village Council later on this month. Educational Day is planned at Twinney Pond Park On April 10^th from 10:30 a.m. until 12:00 noon. A number of youngsters have already signed up to learn about the park and the pond, and they will help plant milkweed seeds to attract butterflies. The CFRPL is extremely gratified that the native plants that were planted last year are coming up strong. This planting will continue with the advice of an ecologist; noxious weeds will continue to be eradicated; and children will continue to be trained. In mid-April, the CFRPL will complete the North Broad Street Project, which is located between the train staircase and the previous taxi building. With help from Jacobsen Landscaping, dozens of flowering shrubs will be planted to enhance the Central Business District (CBD). The Daffodil Festival and Earth Day Celebration will be held on Sunday, April 23^rd from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at Van Neste Memorial Park.

Ms. Halaby explained that the mission of the CFRPL is to enhance and restore Ridgewood parklands. The CFRPL continues to feel very strongly that the cutting back of greenery and trees in front of the train station and Wilsey Square to create additional parking will cause irreputable damage. These two small areas of open land represent the green spaces in the area and once they are removed they are gone forever. Ms. Halaby urged the Village Council to reconsider this idea.

Alyson McCormack, 51 Sherman Place, recalled that at the last Village Council meeting, Charlie DeMarco of CSAC stated that the perceived issue on Pomander Walk was an operational one. She questioned why residents of Pomander Walk were discussing their issues with CSAC if they are not safety related. Neither CSAC, the Police Department or the Engineering Department made any recommendations to limit the parking on Pomander Walk; the parking ban was granted because the residents asked for it.

Ms. McCormack presented the Village Councilmembers with copies of an e-mail from Rich Calbi, Ridgewood’s Director of Operations, which indicated that, with the exception of the intersection near Godwin Avenue and the cul-de-sac, relevant people involved in Water, Streets, Fleets, Sanitation, Yard Waste and Recycling have not reported issues with parking on Pomander Walk.

Peter Quinn, 66 Pomander Walk, stated that the residents of Pomander Walk came before the Village Council with a safety issue, not a parking issue. The extra traffic on Pomander Walk was turning it into a commercial business district adjunct parking lot. Mr. Quinn urged the Village Council to consider alternative solutions instead of reversing the ordinance. Mr. Quinn felt the Village Council was receptive to the loudest and coarsest voices among the residents, and he felt the Village Council was bringing out the worst in the residents. He referred to websites turning neighbor against neighbor; anonymous signs posted in the neighborhood; accusations that Pomander Walk residents and service providers are parking on the street; and photographs being taken anonymously of vehicles parked along Pomander Walk (which he noted that the lack of parking tickets indicates that enforcement is not working).

Mr. Quinn recalled that when the previous Village Council addressed the no parking ban on Pomander Walk, the potential for parked cars to move to Sherman Place was considered; however, no action was taken. The problem is really the need for CBD parking. Mr. Quinn noted that the businesses located near Santini’s Pizza are in a zone that only requires 7 parking spaces for 70 restaurant seats. Mr. Quinn urged the Village Council to conduct a safety study before reversing the parking ban on Pomander Walk.

Isabelle Altano, 656 Kingsbridge Lane, questioned why the CFRPL spoke in favor of the construction of a 90 foot multi-purpose field on the Schedler Property, which would require the removal of 5 acres of trees, while speaking against the suggested removal of 700 square feet of greenery near the train station to allow for additional parking. Ms. Altano felt the multi-purpose field on the Schedler Property would adversely affect the quality of life in the surrounding neighborhood as well as displace wildlife. She spoke of the importance of preserving trees within the Village wherever they are located.

Melanie McWilliams, 431 Bogert Avenue, urged the Village Council to leave the Bogert Avenue ordinance as it currently stands or expand upon it by extending the hours or times of year, if any changes are to be made at all, noting that traffic concerns also occur during the evening hours and on weekends when special events or sporting events are held at the schools. She observed that there have been no displaced cars and no traffic issues brought on by this ordinance. Safe travel continues between the three schools and the neighborhoods. Bogert Avenue does not have sidewalks and there are many children using the street.

Anne Loving, 342 South Irving Street, thanked the Village Council for issuing the warning about the drinking water and she asked for this issue to be clarified this evening, noting that rumors are making the contamination sound much worse than what actually occurred.

John Parillo, the owner of Santoni’s Pizzeria, 88 Godwin Avenue, stated that the parking ban imposed on Pomander Walk by the previous Village Council has greatly affected his business as well as other businesses in the area. Eat-in business has been reduced by over 50% since the parking ban was implemented. Customers with limited time to eat on their lunch break and the lack of parking, choose to go somewhere else. This also occurs in the evenings as well, and affects take-out customers, too. Fourteen parking spots are shared between four businesses, two of which are sit-down restaurants. Many customers rely on street parking. Mr. Parillo felt that the burden of parking should be shared between all streets in the area. Residents of Pomander Walk need parking in the front of their homes for larger service vehicles and delivery trucks that cannot fit into driveways. Mr. Parillo felt that the parking ban was imposed without any substantial studies or investigations completed. Without any legitimate traffic study, Pomander Walk went from two-hour parking to no parking, overnight. If the two-hour parking limit on Pomander Walk is reinstated, Mr. Parillo will be committed to use his lots for delivery drivers, preserving the on-street parking for customers. He understood the residents’ concerns, noting that he already implemented new procedures instructing his delivery drivers to use only his lot. He urged the Village Council to reconsider the complete parking ban on Pomander Walk and conduct a proper traffic study to determine the needs of the area.

Gail Conenello, 23 Garfield Place, urged the Village Council to take the actions necessary to restore parking to at least one side of Pomander Walk, and to fairly and equitably consider the concerns of all of the residents affected by the traffic and parking in the area. It is not an appropriate solution to provide complete relief to certain residents while placing a greater burden on other residents. The concerns of the residents of one street should not be valued over the concerns of others. There is no valid basis to wait for the results of the West Side Traffic Study before action is taken to restore a fair amount of parking on Pomander Walk. The impact that the parking ban has placed on surrounding streets is real, it has been documented, and it should not be allowed to continue.   Also, the failure of the Pomander Walk residents to abide by the no parking restriction has been fully documented and is indisputable. Ms. Conenello asked the Village Council to modify the Pomander Walk parking ban to mirror the restrictions that are in place on all of the surrounding streets. Ms. Conenello also noted that proceeding with the West Side Traffic Study without a modification to the Pomander Walk restrictions would result in a study based on inaccurate and incomplete data and information.

Peter Bennett, 448 Cambridge Road, stated that all the issues involving the Cambridge Road and Bogert Avenue parking ban have stemmed from the opinion of one or two people without the benefit of studies. The vast majority of residents do not feel there is an issue, except possibly in the area of the “funnel”. There is a sidewalk on one side of the street. The biggest issue is with people cutting the island. Mr. Bennett asked for the double yellow line to be reinstituted and for the creation of a “one-hour in the morning and one-hour in the afternoon” parking/stopping ban on the corners, reaching out as far as the start of the first driveways.

Rurik Halaby, 374 Evergreen Place, asked Mayor Knudsen to recuse herself from any Police Department budget considerations because she has sons on the staff of the Police Department. Mr. Halaby added that he is requesting this with sincere admiration and respect for both Mayor Knudsen and her sons, but he wanted to make sure that the budget is presented to the public without bias.

Christine Malloy, 243 North Pleasant Avenue, stated her opposition to removing the greenspace and brick walkway at the Village Train Station to allow for additional parking spots. The net gain of parking spots will not solve the Ridgewood parking problem, and will only mar the appeal of this great town. She was greatly disappointed that this topic was even up for discussion. The parks, towering trees, flower beds and landscaping make Ridgewood exceptionally beautiful. Ms. Malloy and her husband moved to Ridgewood for its excellent schools and the charming downtown area. She stated that Ridgewood is a community that takes pride in its streets and she urged the Village Council not to ignore the simple beauty of a quiet greenspace in favor of a few parking spots.

Adam Fox, 112 Stanley Place, urged the Village Council to reconsider the Pomander Walk ordinance. The restriction put in place in June was done without any impact analysis. As a resident of a neighboring street, he has been directly, negatively impacted. A study is not needed to see that more pedestrians are being forced to cross Godwin Avenue. Mr. Fox stated that he has stopped patronizing the businesses because he doesn’t want to cross Godwin Avenue and is unable to park on Pomander Walk for five minutes. He has observed residents of Pomander Walk double-parking in their driveways because they can’t park in the street. This requires pedestrians to walk in the street; so in solving one problem, another was created. Parking is an issue for all residents and he felt that one-side-of-the-street parking is a fair and equitable compromise for all residents.

Jane Shinozuka, 825 Norgate Drive, requested that the podium be moved so speakers can be heard in the back of the room.

Mayor Knudsen explained that the site plan applications before the Planning Board are compliant applications and that none of the members of the current Village Council voted on the ordinances that supported these applications. The issue of water usage was raised and considered.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she took exception with the suggestion that the Village Council brings out the worst in anyone. The Village Council is not responsible for people’s behavior, nor do the Village Councilmembers bring out the worst in anyone. On the contrary, the Village Council brings out the best in people because it encourages vibrant conversations and inspires residents to become engaged in their government.

3. PRESENTATION
4. Ridgewood Water Presentation - Lead and Copper

Rich Calbi, Director of Ridgewood Water, and David Scheibner, Business Manager of Ridgewood Water were present.

Mr. Scheibner stated that before the scheduled presentation, he would like to address some current news.   A fecal indicator, e-coli, was recently detected in a ground water source sample in the low pressure zone, which includes portions of Ridgewood, Wyckoff and all of Glen Rock. Customers have the right to know what happened and what is being done to correct the situation. On April 4^th, a sample was collected from a ground water source before it was treated, and the sample tested positive for e-coli. It is important to note that water from this source is disinfected before distribution to customers, and no distribution system samples have tested positive for fecal indicators or any other bacteria. The notice stated that for drinking, making ice, brushing teeth, washing dishes and food preparation, people should bring the water to a boil, allowing it to boil for one minute and then cool down before using, or to use bottled water until further notice. Boiling kills bacteria and other organisms in the water. Fecal indicators are microbes whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated with human or animal waste. Microbes in these wastes can cause short term health effects such as diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches and other systems. Microbes may pose special health risks for infants, young children, some of the elderly, and people with severely compromised immune systems. Mr. Scheibner pointed out that the symptoms he listed are not caused only by organisms in drinking water, so if any of these symptoms are experienced and they persist, people may want to seek medical advice. People at increased risk should seek medical advice concerning drinking the water. The source water well in question has been shut down and treatment is underway. The public will be informed when tests show that no e-coli is present and when boiling is no longer needed. If more information is needed, residents may call Ridgewood Water at 201-670-5520 or visit them at 131 North Maple Avenue on Level 5. General guidelines to lessen the risk of infection by microbes are available from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791.   Copies of this information are available this evening.

Mr. Calbi added that the advisory is precautionary. There is certainly no e-coli outbreak in the system. The e-coli detection was in the raw water and all water is treated before release into the distribution system. A precautionary notice is required by law. The Village has consulted with both the State Department of Environmental Protection and the Environmental Protection Agency on the content of the notice. It is anticipated that the situation will be resolved by Friday, April 7^th, and a new notice indicating that the boil water advisory has been lifted is anticipated to be sent out at that time. The subject well was shut-off at 1:00 a.m. last evening.

Councilman Hache questioned the effectiveness of the normal treatment of the water in preventing e-coli from entering the system. Mr. Calbi explained that this effective rate is 99.99% based upon the new levels of chlorine being implemented and a Four-Log Treatment System. An application for installation of a new pump was submitted in January, ahead of this event as a precautionary effort, and is being expedited with approval expected tomorrow.

Mr. Scheibner began the scheduled presentation on lead and copper at this time. Ridgewood Water detected lead in the water in some homes in 2012 during routine testing for lead. Ridgewood Water’s response has been to develop, test and implement a corrosion control treatment program and to provide education to the public.

Last year, Ridgewood Water sent notices to all addresses in their service territory informing them about the lead test results from June, 2012. Similar notices were sent out periodically since then. He directed everyone’s attention to documentation available this evening that provided contact information to find out more about the water quality of their particular service line. Mr. Scheibner stated that he will also be available after the presentation with a computer to provide this information to any interested parties.

Mr. Scheibner stated that consumers should remember that the source water does not contain lead. Lead gets into the water from plumbing materials that contain lead through a process called lead corrosion. Two conditions need to be present at the same time for lead to corrode into the water; contact and stagnation. Replacing materials that contain lead with lead-free materials will eliminate the possibility of water contacting lead, but this can sometimes be complicated and expensive. Another way to prevent water to lead contact is by creating a barrier between the water and the plumbing material that contains lead. Ridgewood Water’s corrosion control treatment creates such a barrier. The treatment consists of the feeding of a small amount of liquid phosphate into the water at each point of entry into the distribution system. Ions of the phosphate bond to ions of minerals, including lead, resulting in a thin coating on the interior surfaces of plumbing materials that prevents water from physically contacting the plumbing materials. The second condition required for lead, stagnation, is the state of water remaining motionless inside pipes and fixtures when the water isn’t being used. The longer the stagnation, the greater the corrosion. Because we usually don’t use water constantly in our homes and businesses, stagnation is inevitable. Mr. Scheibner recommended running a faucet for 30 seconds to 1 minute when drawing water for cooking or drinking, if the faucet has not been used for several hours.

Ridgewood Water completed the implantation of the corrosion control treatment one year ago. The first round of testing was completed last fall, and the results are available on the NJDEP web page called, “Water Watch”. The treatment has been found to be 80% effective in preventing lead corrosion, overall. The next round of testing is underway. Test sites are homes and businesses determined to be at higher risk due to lead service lines, or homes built in the last four years before lead solder was banned.

Unrelated to the lead issue, Mr. Scheibner stated that the EPA required that Ridgewood Water evaluate about three-quarters of the wells for vulnerability to fecal contamination for the past year. This requirement is based upon a well’s proximity to surface water. The four-log chlorination has been required at some locations as a precaution until the evaluation is completed in May and indicates that the higher levels of chlorine at those particular locations are unnecessary.

Mr. Scheibner stated that Ridgewood Water is committed to keeping customers informed of events and operating conditions that have an impact on the water that is so fundamental to our way of life.

Mayor Knudsen asked if corrosion is accelerated because of the high mineral content in Ridgewood’s water. Mr. Calbi explained that this is mostly the result of the PH of the water, (the more acidic it is). The water systems come from many different sources with many different wells, so this PH varies. For the most part, the ground water is stable. In the areas where treatment is necessary because of contaminants and the characteristic of the PH has changed, the treatment provided will stabilize this reaction. Mr. Scheibner further explained that the corrosion control process actually reduces the hardness of the water because it attaches to the calcium as well as to the lead.

4. DISCUSSION
5. Ridgewood Water

                        1.)        Award Contract - Tree Maintenance Services

Ms. Mailander explained that two bid specifications were picked up with one being received. The sole responsible bidder was Downes Tree Service. Funding for this project is budgeted for in the Water Utility Budget.

                        2.)        Award Contract - Water Main Replacements at Stream Crossings

Ms. Mailander explained that Mott MacDonald was hired as the engineer of record for this project. Five bids were received. The lowest responsible bidder was Fred Devens Construction. Mott MacDonald prepared the construction documents, reviewed all bids and will assist Ridgewood Water with administering the construction work. The project will replace water mains at the following four stream crossing locations: Spring Avenue at the Ho-Ho-Kus Brook; Linwood Avenue at the Saddle River; North Irving at the Ho-Ho-Kus Brook; and East Ridgewood Avenue at the Ho-Ho-Kus Brook. This is necessary because the existing piping is exposed at the stream bed. Each location will be replaced with new pipe constructed at a deeper profile and properly encased for future protection.

Councilwoman Walsh questioned the life span of piping. Mr. Calbi stated that there are some existing pipes in the Village that are almost 100 years old. The new piping proposed will have a useful life of at least 50 years. Some of these locations are in major flood zones.

                        3.)        Award Contract Under State Contract - Materials and Supplies - Water Main Repairs

Ms. Mailander explained that this will allow the Village to obtain materials and supplies as needed.

                        4.)        Authorize Change Order - Rehabilitation of Glen Tank

Ms. Mailander explained that this rehabilitation was necessary to comply with the USEPA Administrative Order. An additional $29,766 is required to complete the work, which includes changing hardware, changing fence fabric and additional painting. The Change Order is being awarded to Brave Industrial Paint, LLC, of Long Branch, New Jersey. The Change Order increases the contract total by 6.9%

1. Parking

                        1.)        Update on Hudson Street Parking Garage

Ms. Mailander explained that the Village has been working with Desman Design Management to reduce the size and footprint of the garage. The cost to change the existing plans to prepare them for bid is approximately $100,000, which includes architectural design, engineering, site plan and Desman themselves. Walker Parking Consulting Group would need to update their report with new space numbers and new revenue stream, under the new interest rates. The cost of construction will not be known prior to Desman redoing their sketches. Basically, construction should begin next spring, and be completed sometime in 2019.

Councilman Voigt thanked Ms. Mailander and Ridgewood C.F.O. Bob Rooney for putting together this information.

Ms. Mailander stated that the ordinance would be adopted one month after it is introduced, which may shorten the time shown on the Projected Timetable contained in the Councilmembers packets. This document will be made available to the public on the Village website.          

Mayor Knudsen asked for a construction cost analysis detailing the worst-case-scenario and the best-case-scenario. Ms. Mailander will speak to Mr. Rooney about preparing this document.

Councilman Sedon suggested not spending any money on construction documents until several public meetings are held. He asked for conceptual designs and a financial analysis from Walker, based on the amount of spaces and available information, before going out and getting detailed documents. Ms. Mailander noted that a conceptual design will still cost money, but it will be less expensive.

Councilwoman Walsh agreed with Councilman Sedon. She stated that she was not in favor of the retail aspect of the garage. She asked that any design or plans include a component of what the proposed retail would bring in, as compared to the parking spots. Councilwoman Walsh felt the public was interested in more parking spaces, not more retail space.

2. Requests for Proposals - Pilot Program - Alternative/Non-traditional Commuter Transportation Services

Ms. Mailander explained that this proposal is for transportation companies like Uber or Lift to drive commuters to and from the train station. There was one plan holder eligible to submit; however, no proposals were received. This is the second time a Request for Proposal was requested.

Village Attorney Matthew Rogers stated that the Village can negotiate with the provider at this point, but it must be in similar terms to what the bid proposed. Ms. Mailander stated that this will be done internally and then brought before the Village Council at a Work Session.

3. Preliminary Design for Train Station Parking Area

Ms. Mailander stated that based on last week’s discussion, Village Engineer Chris Rutishauser prepared a new drawing. Ms. Mailander described the key points of the new design. There is an overall gain of 38 parking spaces; 10 of which would be at the Prospect Street Lot/Van Neste Square location. The plan relocates the bus station from Oak Street to the train station area. Relocation of the bus stop to the train station would create a true intermodal transportation system, as well as get buses off of East Ridgewood Avenue, which has been a large concern for the Police Department because of difficulties with maneuverability. The current bus station is not in the best condition, so the Village will soon have to invest capital in the building. The 90-degree parking stalls proposed at the lot closest to the train station would be easier to plow. New trees are proposed to offset those that would need to be removed at the train station. The flagpole was relocated to the center of the existing island, making it more prominent. Ms. Mailander added that an e-mail discussion was just initiated with New Jersey Transit concerning the proposal to move the bus station.

Mr. Rutishauser further explained the proposed plan. The current island will be made 8’ or 9’ wide, which is much narrower than existing conditions.   Considerably more trees than what exists now are proposed to be added. He pointed out that many of the existing trees are in poor shape. Mr. Rutishauser stated that in preparing the plan, an observation was made indicating that the majority of cars being parked by commuters were on the small to medium size. This led to the creation of compact car parking spaces, which are slightly narrower and shorter than current parking spaces. With these design constraints, the new plan shows an overall gain of 38 parking spaces at the train station and, by the elimination of the bus shelter, at Van Neste Square. Mr. Rutishauser noted that his department has been considering this idea for years; at least as far back as 2004.

Mr. Rutishauser spoke about an e-mail correspondence from a representative of New Jersey Transit concerning bus routes through the Village. There about 900 transit customers who move through the Ridgewood bus terminal on a typical week day with 300 customers on a Saturday and an additional 100 customers on a Sunday. New Jersey Transit runs six routes through the Ridgewood bus terminal. This will not change if the bus station is moved to the train station. Typical weekday transit counts amount to 301 bus movements through the existing Van Neste Square location. Mr. Rutishauser stated that he will forward a copy of this e-mail to the Village Councilmembers for their review.

Mr. Rutishauser further explained that buses currently lay over as many as three-at-a-time over by Van Neste Square, in parking spaces dedicated to them. Once the bus station is relocated, these bus parking spaces can be converted back to parking spaces. He noted that the bus shelter proposed will be no more than a three-sided shelter, sufficient for a short-term wait for a bus. This design will also discourage longer stays, such as overnight.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser stated that the hours with the most bus movements, twenty-eight, were 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. During the period of 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., there were 21 bus movements.

Under questioning by Mr. Voigt, Mr. Rutishauser summarized the advantages of moving the bus station as: the gaining of additional parking spaces in the core area of the CBD; the movement of buses off of East Ridgewood Avenue onto Franklin Avenue; and more room for buses to layover out of the way of the CBD. Mr. Rutishauser noted that a disadvantage is that there will be a loss of approximately 10 shopper/diner parking spots in the Wilsey Square Lot, which may need to be relocated to the main train station lot as 3-hour patron parking. The turning radius for the buses is sufficient. When the design layout was prepared, a modern 45’ bus length turning radius template was used.

Under questioning by Councilman Sedon, Mr. Rutishauser said the 10 patron parking spaces lost on Wilsey Square as a result of the relocation of the bus stop, will be gained at the Van Neste Square location. There will be an overall net gain of 38 parking spaces.

Under questioning by Councilman Sedon, Mr. Rutishauser said there will be some traffic as a result of buses coming into the train station. The intersection is signalized. There will be more bus movement in the Garber Square corridor. The offset to this is the removal of buses from East Ridgewood Avenue, which is the Village’s primary shopping corridor.

Councilwoman Walsh complimented Mr. Rutishauser on preparing a thorough design. Using a map contained in her packet, she observed that busses will be traveling from Ridgewood Avenue, making a right turn onto Maple Avenue and then a left turn onto Franklin Avenue, and then travel under and around and out the same way. Mr. Rutishauser noted that NJ Transit may consider altering the bus routes somewhat to mitigate and duplicating bus traffic. The busses already operating on the west of the tracks will probably use this corridor, as well as the lay over lanes. Four to five busses can easily be stored in this area.

Under questioning by Councilwoman Walsh, Mr. Rutishauser stated that parking spaces in the train station can be designated as shopper/diner parking spaces to replace the shopper/diner parking spaces lost from Wilsey Square.

Under questioning by Councilwoman Walsh, Mr. Rutishauser explained that the shelter proposed will have a maximum of three sides. Further input on the design of this shelter is needed from NJ Transit and the State Historic Preservation Office. Mr. Rutishauser noted that if NJ Transit is in favor of the bus station relocation, he would ask them for a contribution toward the bus shelter.

Councilman Hache approved of the design presented by Mr. Rutishauser, especially the additional trees being gained.

Under questioning by Councilman Hache, Mr. Rutishauser stated that the preliminary cost estimate for this project is in the range of $300,000.

Under questioning by Councilman Hache, Mr. Rutishauser stated that if the existing incline in the location of the spaces facing Wilsey Square was flattened out, a retaining wall would be required, adding additional costs to the project.

Under questioning by Councilman Hache, Mr. Rutishauser, explained that cars dropping off people at the train station can come in over by the “Smoke Restaurant”, bear slightly to the left of the island and seek a parking space or continue across to the main train station.

Councilman Sedon suggested shortening the island at the upper part of the parking lot first, without moving the bus station, which will avoid the involvement of NJ Transit. Mr. Rutishauser explained that this will not accommodate the necessary bus turning radius or a larger number of parking spaces.

Under questioning by Councilman Hache, the current configuration of the underpass lane is wide enough to accommodate the buses and a bike lane.

Mayor Knudsen thanked Mr. Rutishauser for including additional trees in his proposal.

Mayor Knudsen asked if the crosshatched boxes on either side of parallel parking spaces can be removed to create additional parking. Mr. Rutishauser explained that these boxes help people’s perception when they parallel park and also keep traffic moving better, because these boxes make it much easier to pull or back into a parallel parking space.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser estimated the size of the island containing the flagpole as approximately 10’ to 15’ in size. The westerly tip of this island will act as a refuge island for pedestrians crossing.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser did not feel the underpass road was wide enough for two lines, as the curb on the westbound side lies on the right-of-way limit line.  

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser stated that there will be a mixture of compact and regular sized parking spaces.

Councilman Hache questioned whether rerouting the bus traffic would impact traffic exiting the Ken Smith site.   Mr. Rutishauser stated that the signal at this intersection needs to be upgraded and survey work is ongoing. If the County is reluctant in moving in a timely manner to upgrade this signal, the Village may need to have a further discussion with the applicant regarding a contribution to complete the upgrade in a timely manner. The hope is to have this signal, which is located at North Broad Street, integrated to the corresponding signal by Oak Street. This will help create gaps in the traffic so that pedestrians can cross by Chestnut Street. This technique was used with other traffic lights in the Village, including near the high school lot.

At Mayor Knudsen’s request, Mr. Rutishauser will provide the Village Councilmembers with copies of the most recent traffic study for the Ken Smith site from both the Village professionals and the applicant’s professionals. Mr. Rutishauser stated that a list of what the Village is requesting, as far as off-site improvements from the Ken Smith applicant, is being prepared and will be forwarded to the applicant’s attorney.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Rutishauser stated that the $300,000 cost estimate includes the changes in the parking lots, and bus upgrade. Mr. Rutishauser will ask NJ Transit for a contribution.

Mayor Knudsen felt that the traffic report prepared by Traffic Consultant Gordon Meth on the North Broad/Franklin Avenue intersection would be helpful.

Ms. Mailander suggested that the Village Councilmembers review the traffic reports requested, advise her of any requests for changes or additional information, and then hold another discussion at a future Work Session, where two or three different scenarios could be considered.

Councilwoman Walsh expressed a concern with the negative impact of 300 buses a day going down Franklin Avenue, combined with traffic exiting the newly approved development, traffic exiting the Ken Smith development, and the current traffic. She strongly felt that the County must be a partner in this.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Rutishauser explained that the County is more inclined to fund a traffic light upgrade at the intersection of two County roads, such as the Linwood Avenue and Maple Avenue intersection. At the intersection in question, only Franklin Avenue is a County road; North Board Street is a municipal street.

Mayor Knudsen asked for an hourly breakdown of the bus trips. Mr. Rutishauser will request this in an e-mail to NJ Transit.

4. Parking on Pomander Walk

Sergeant Jay Chuck was also present for this discussion.

Ms. Mailander explained that this is a proposal to prohibit parking on the South/West side of Pomander Walk from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on all days from Godwin Avenue to the end; and to limit parking on the North/East side of Pomander Walk to two hours from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on all days except Sundays and Holidays from Godwin Avenue to the end.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Sergeant Chuck explained that the parking restrictions end before the bulb of Pomander Walk, so the turn-around will not be inhibited. There is no parking within the cul-de-sac.

Under questioning by Councilman Hache, Mr. Rutishauser stated that he did not calculate how many on-street parking spaces will be available, nor did he anticipate marking out parking spaces. Tick marks could be marked at driveway openings to avoid obstruction; however, sometimes residents object to the installation of tick marks.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Sergeant Chuck confirmed that there is a stop sign on Pomander Walk where it intersects with Godwin Avenue. Parking is not permitted within 50’ of a stop sign.

Under questioning by Councilman Sedon, Sergeant Chuck said that, although this is subjective, the Police Department feels that one-side-of-the-street parking on Pomander Walk would not have a negative impact on safety. Parking along one side of the road can actually help with the safety aspect, because it slows down traffic and narrows the roadway. Tick marks have the same result.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser explain that normally tick marks are setback approximately 1’ to 1.5’ back from the curb cut. Field conditions could affect placement.

A discussion was held on introducing an ordinance to allow these changes.  

Councilman Voigt acknowledged that he failed to consult with the residents of Sherman Place when considering the parking ban on Pomander Walk. He felt the current restrictions placed an unfair hardship on residents and businesses in the surrounding area. He stated that he was in favor of restoring parking to one side of the street.

Councilwoman Walsh recalled a problem with parking on Pomander Walk created by the previous owner of Santini’s Pizzeria and she thanked the current owner, John Parillo, for his efforts to correct this problem.

Councilwoman Walsh felt that the 50’ required parking restriction from the stop sign on Pomander Walk should be clearly delineated. She asked for the residents of Pomander Walk to be consulted before tick marks are painted on the street.

Councilman Hache spoke about the importance of striking a balance between parking, safety, and the viability of businesses. He personally observed service vehicles parking on Pomander Walk and he felt there was a definite need for on-street parking. Councilman Hache supported an examination of the entire area, from west of the train tracks to the Monroe/Washington School area. Allowing one-side-of-the street parking on Pomander Walk will allow for a true picture of conditions. Councilman Hache thanked Mr. Rutishauser and Sergeant Chuck for their work.

Mayor Knudsen noted that at last night’s Planning Board meeting, the traffic consultant made a comment that the Village is a victim of its own success. At some point, the only option is for traffic to slow down and travel cautiously.   Mayor Knudsen felt that everyone must share the traffic and parking burden, as well as the Village’s success.

5. Cambridge Road and Bogert Avenue Parking

Ms. Mailander noted that many residents have spoken out against the parking restrictions that currently exist. In an effort to reduce the impact of the original parking ordinance, Mr. Rutishauser prepared a revised ordinance for the Village Council’s consideration. Ms. Mailander listed the differences as follows:

• reducing the area of no stopping or standing to approximately 255 LF along the west curb line of Bogert Avenue from East Glen northward;
• reducing the area of no stopping or standing to approximately 297 LF along the east curb line of Cambridge Road from East Glen northward;
• no stopping or standing to be in effect 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, September 1^st to June 30^th;
• creating a no parking zone for within 25’ of the corner at Bogert and Cambridge, which leaves an approximately 170’ area along the curb of 419 Bogert and 420 Cambridge facing toward East Glen Avenue for parking; and
• paint double line striping from East Glen Avenue northward to the small circle to better guide motorists entering from East Glen Avenue.

Mayor Knudsen noted that when this issue was before CSAC, the minutes indicated that there was never a time when parking was prohibited for a distance of 500’; the no parking zone was always focused on the funnel.

Councilman Voigt stated that he was happy with the revisions.

Under questioning by Councilman Sedon, Mr. Rutishauser explained that once the curve on the Bogert side straightens out, the restriction on parking ceases.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser explained that the word “approximately” is used in the proposed revised ordinance because he used a wheel to measure the area, not a surveying instrument.

Under questioning by Councilwoman Walsh, Mr. Rutishauser confirmed that parking is never permitted on curves that are considered as part of an intersection, or within 50’ of a stop sign. A double yellow line will direct people up from Glen Avenue to the island. Traffic bollards will probably be mounted within the striping to further dissuade people from crossing there. An arrow could also be added directing vehicles around the island.

Councilman Hache felt the double yellow line made sense. He expressed a concern with the safety of the children walking to school. Sergeant Chuck explained that there are crosswalks on Bogert and Glen Avenue, but they need to be repainted. A crossing guard study was conducted in this area. Twelve children trips were observed and a minimum of 40 children trips are required for a crossing guard. Older children traveling to school by themselves naturally go to the crossing guard located one block away. Parents walking with their children are choosing to cross the street at the intersection without the crossing guard.

All Councilmembers were in agreement to move forward with the revised ordinance.

6. Repeat Zone Parking

Councilman Voigt explained that this a proposal to move employee vehicles out of the CBD core area encompassing North Broad Street, South Broad Street, both sides of East Ridgewood Avenue, Oak Street going east between Franklin Avenue and East Ridgewood Avenue, Prospect Street on the south side to Hudson Street, Chestnut Street between Franklin Avenue and East Ridgewood Avenue, and Oak Street on Franklin Avenue/East Ridgewood Avenue and Van Neste Square.

Councilman Voigt stated that remedies such as an increased cost for parking tickets and access to less expensive long term lots such as Cottage Place have not appeared to work over the past 4-6 months.

Councilman Voigt proposed to make the streets within the core area he listed as “No Repeat Parking Zones”. Parking would be permitted for three hours; however, after three hours the car would have to be moved.

Sergeant Chuck noted that employees who cannot find employee designated parking spaces close to the CBD, are not travelling the additional three or four blocks to use the employee designated parking spots in the Cottage Street Lot. Sergeant Chuck expressed a concern with the enforcement of repeat parking, as it is very labor intensive for one parking enforcement officer to collect the evidence needed to make sure that the person has been using the space for over 3 hours. Repeat parking is also difficult to enforce because other violations exist, such as an overtime violation (expiration of the meter) or a violation of time restraints (no money was put in the meter).

To by-pass the time restrictions legally, Sergeant Chuck noted that some residents are buying commuter passes and parking by the stores. Some people are parking for a few hours and then moving their cars. Some are moving cars around with friends. Others are leaving for a few hours then returning to the same general area. This becomes very confusing from an enforcement standpoint. The ordinance would need to contain a strong definition of repeat parking that would result in proper enforcement and successful prosecution.

Ms. Mailander pointed out that a challenge exists with zoning. The Village parking lots are one zone, with the exception of the Walnut Street Lot, and one side of East Ridgewood Avenue is one zone and the other entire side of East Ridgewood Avenue is another zone. Ms. Mailander also noted that the ordinance must clearly define the time limit of any “break” in parking.

Ms. Mailander stated that from January to March, 2017 there were 450 cases of repeat parking tickets written; 430 of those were payments made without a court appearance. Out of the 20 cases that went through the court, 16 were dismissed for various reasons. Out of the 4 that were tried, 3 were found not guilty and only 1 was found guilty. Ms. Mailander stated that this shows that people are willing to pay to repeat park and consider this cost as a part of doing business.

Councilman Sedon asked for a concrete definition of repeat parking, as this appears to be the base of any decision.

Councilwoman Walsh felt that the Ridgewood Guild and the Ridgewood Chamber of Commerce should be consulted before any further considerations are made.

Councilman Hache stated that there must be an element of personal responsibility. When employees park in a shopper/diner parking space, they are potentially limiting the number of customers at their store. Also, employees who purchased an employee parking pass and park elsewhere are in effect utilizing two parking spaces. Considering that these employee parking passes were offered at a reduced rate, this is an insult to the Village. Councilman Hache felt employers should make parking in employee designated spaces a condition of employment.

Councilman Sedon agreed that business owners should not use shopper spaces and he reiterated his call for a concrete definition of repeat parking.

Mayor Knudsen pointed out that zoned parking effects shoppers as well as employees. She agreed that both the Ridgewood Guild and the Ridgewood Chamber of Commerce should be asked to be a part of this discussion. She suggested writing a letter to businesses within the CBD urging them to instruct their employees on where to park. This letter could underscore the fact that without available parking spaces there would be no customers.

Mayor Knudsen noted that she observed employees parking in spaces and not putting money in the meter until they see a parking meter enforcement officer in the area, which illegally extends the time period they are able to park there.

Ms. Mailander summed up the results of this discussion, as follows: the Village Council is requesting a clear definition of repeat parking; asking Councilman Hache to contact the Ridgewood Guild and the Ridgewood Chamber of Commerce to ask for assistance; and asking for a letter to be written to business owners requesting that they post a sign, in an area where employees gather, clearly identifying where employees should park. Councilman Hache suggested monitoring the situation for a month after this letter is sent to see if anything changes.

At the request of Councilman Voigt, Sergeant Chuck stated that he would provide statistics showing the locations where the greatest number of parking tissues were issued.

1. Budget
2. Reject Bids - School Bus Transportation Services - Summer Day Camp

Ms. Mailander explained that one bid was received; however, it was higher than available funds, so the Village is being asked to reject this bid. This will allow the services to go back out to bid so that the school bus transportation is in place in time for the summer camp to begin.

2. Award Contract - Professional Traffic Engineering Services - West Side Study Area

Ms. Mailander explained that the Village received proposals from two plan holders eligible to bid. The lowest responsible bidder was Petry Traffic and Transportation Engineering. This will be funded through a temporary emergency fund and then put into the Operating Budget, allowing it to be, most likely, awarded in April.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Ms. Mailander confirmed that this is the study that involved streets including Pomander Walk, Sherman Place, and Garfield Place.

3. Award Contract - Gate House Sloped Entry - Habernickel Family Park

Ms. Mailander explained that there were 13 plan holders eligible to bid. The Village received 11 bids. The low bidder’s package did not submit the bid bond and consent of surety forms on the correct forms. The second low bidder was Onque Technologies. Onque Technologies submitted the correct forms and provided a cashier’s check as bid security. It is recommended that the bid be awarded to the second low bidder, Onque Technologies, subject to Mr. Roger’s review. The work is covered by a Bergen County Community Block Development Grant in the amount of $50,000. The remainder will need to be funded by the Village.

4. Award Contract - Communications - Police Department

Ms. Mailander explained that this contract is for the furnishing, delivering and maintenance of emergency equipment, radios, vehicle computer systems, and other patrol equipment. The sole bidder was Regional Communications, Inc. out of Paramus, NJ. The bid was complete and structured for a one-year period with a renewable second year. Regional Communications has consented to hold their prices for a second year.

5. Award Contract - Paving

Ms. Mailander explained that there were 9 plan holders eligible to bid. The Village received 6 bids. The low bid was received from JA Alexander out of Bloomfield, NJ, with a quote of $1,791,710.14. A complete package was submitted and the low bidder has worked successfully for the Village on past paving projects.

There is currently $1million available to put toward the paving, so a partial award in the amount of $1million is recommended to start the paving work as soon as possible.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Rutishauser stated that there is an existing list of streets that need paving, with streets in the worst condition taking precedence. Work will be completed on as many streets as possible within the limits of the funding. Mr. Rutishauser added that the Village has applied for a NJDOT Municipal Aid Grant Award for 2017 for the paving of North Pleasant Avenue. If this is granted in 2017, it may not be the full amount needed for North Pleasant Avenue, so Mr. Rutishauser recommended holding money in reserve, so the work could begin this year. He added that it is doubtful that the work will begin in 2017, since NJDOT has not yet responded.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser stated that replacement trees will be planted where ever possible following the PSE&G mantra “the right tree for the right place”.

Mayor Knudsen felt the $.01-unit price in the proposal for hay bales was an unusual amount.   Mr. Rutishauser explained that the contractor put every item that he thinks he might use in the proposal. The items he thinks he is not going to use he “pennies them” in the hope that the Village will not ask for these items.

6. Award Contract - Central Valet

Ms. Mailander explained that there were 3 plan holders eligible to submit; however, no proposals were received. In soliciting feedback from the plan holders, one said that without the Village providing municipal parking lots for the cars to be parked in, they were not interested in bidding.

Ms. Mailander stated that the bid will be reviewed internally to see if it can be restructured before it goes out to bid again.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Ms. Mailander explained that the plan holder was looking for a free municipal lot in close proximity to the CBD.

7. Surplus of Police Vehicles

Ms. Mailander explained that there are two vehicles that the Police Department would like to have declared as surplus. One is a 2009 Ford Crown Victoria, which is unreliable, the air conditioning doesn’t work, and the car vibrates while idling. The other is a 2007 Ford Crown Victoria, which is unreliable, past its life expectancy, has an odometer that is unable to be read, air conditioning that doesn’t work, and an engine in need of repair. The vehicles will be turned over to Enterprise, LLC and sold at public auction with the proceeds credited to the Ridgewood Police Department account with Enterprise, LLC. The Village leases vehicles from Enterprise, LLC throughout the year.

8. Temporary Emergency Budget Appropriations

Ms. Mailander explained that this is required for the study of the West Side.

9. Temporary Emergency Capital Budget

 

Ms. Mailander explained that this is required because the Capital Budget has not yet been adopted.

10. Capital Ordinances

Ms. Mailander stated that the Capital Ordinances will be introduced next week at the same time as the budget introduction, which includes the General Capital Budget, the Water Capital Budget, and the Parking Utility Capital Budget. The Raw Budget and the Capital Ordinances will be adopted at the Public Hearing scheduled for May 10^th. The departments can then start awarding contracts in June.

Under questioning by Councilman Sedon, Ms. Mailander stated that the Graydon Pool bathroom renovation was budgeted for $30,000.

1. Policy
2.          Amend Chapter 260 - Trees and Shrubs

Ms. Mailander explained that the goals of this ordinance are to preserve the Village’s native tree stock; advocating for the removal of invasive and non-indigenous tree and shrub species; educating the public not to plant invasive species trees; and maintaining the number of trees the Village has, realizing that trees have a finite lifespan. Mr. Rutishauser wrote the ordinance in conjunction with the Shade Tree Commission and Councilman Sedon, and it was reviewed by the former Village Planner Blaise Brancheau.

Mr. Rogers stated that he reviewed the proposed revised ordinance and had some comments that he sent to Ms. Mailander. Ms. Mailander will forward these comments to Councilman Sedon and Mr. Rutishauser.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser explained that spikes can only be used to ascent a tree by a climber when that tree is being removed. Spikes or gaffs can be particularly injurious to the canopy of a tree.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser explained that the determination on whether a tree is dying or diseased must be made by an arborist or a certified tree expert with established credentials. Some determinations are easy; for example, if it is an elm tree and it has Dutch Elm Disease, the tree will die. Obtaining the services of a qualified tree expert can cost money for diagnosis; however, the cost could be part of the contract to remove it. Most tree services have professionals on staff or as subcontractors. The Village also has a certified tree expert, the Village Arborist, Declan Madden.

The Village Council will wait to further act on this proposed revised ordinance until the Village Attorney’s comments are reviewed.

2. Sustainable Jersey Actions Regarding Responsible Pet Ownership        

Ms. Mailander explained that the Village already has a Responsible Pet Ownership Group in Ridgewood. The Village will pledge to: enforce all animal and rabies control statutes; improve the enforcement of animal cruelty statutes; educate the community about their responsibilities toward pets; institute cat licensing ordinances (which Ridgewood already has); work to implement best practices to prevent unwanted breeding through effective animal control and the availability of low-cost spaying and neutering services; providing alternatives to euthanasia of adoptable companion animals; and assist in identifying resources to improve the conditions and increase the capacity of animal shelters. Adoption of this ordinance will allow the Village to receive additional funds from Sustainable Jersey.

Councilman Sedon stated that the Village is in the process of obtaining certification from Sustainable Jersey.

Mayor Knudsen noted that the fact that approximately 37% of the animals entering New Jersey’s impoundment facilities are euthanized, at a rate of around 3,000 every month, speaks to the importance of adopting unwanted animals.

3. Age Friendly Ridgewood - Mayor’s Pledge

Ms. Mailander explained that there is a national trend for Mayors to sign a pledge that states that they will take steps to adopt some of the policies widely regarded as advantageous for older adults.

Mayor Knudsen stated that this pledge ties into Age Friendly Ridgewood, headed up by Sheila Brogan and Beth Abbott.

A resolution will be prepared to memorialize this action.

4. Boards and Committees - Structures and By-laws

Mayor Knudsen requested the Village Councilmembers to ask their boards and committees to submit their structures and by-laws to Deputy Village Clerk, Donna Jackson, in time for these documents to be reviewed by the Village Council at the next Work Session. Ms. Jackson will forward copies as they arrive so a packet can be prepared for review.

5. Historic Preservation Grant Proposal Through Bergen County Open Space - Zabriskie-Schedler House - Phase II

Ms. Mailander explained that last year the Village applied for a Phase I Historic Preservation Grant of $116,000 for the Zabriskie-Schedler House. This grant has not yet been approved. The Phase 1 request includes restoration of the roof and abatement of interior asbestos and mold. The Phase 2 grant for the Zabriskie-Schedler House would include establishing the following systems for the interior of the house and windows and doors: heating; plumbing; electric; air conditioning; fire/security, and windows, doors, and siding. The estimate for the work would be for it not to exceed $400,000, requiring the Phase 2 grant request to be $200,000 (50/50 split). As with Phase 1, the recommended historic consultants are Hickey & Connelly, who will produce the bid documents to ensure meeting the required historic standards.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Ms. Mailander explained that upkeep for the Zabriskie-Schedler House once it is complete will be funded as part of the Operating Budget under Building Maintenance or under Specific Land or Recreation. Councilman Voigt stated that he recalled that a separate funding mechanism was discussed for this property. He will forward a copy to Ms. Mailander.     

A Letter of Intent will be prepared.

1. Operations
2. Release of Cash Security Bond - Sludge Hauling Contract

Ms. Mailander explained that Ridgewood Green RME, LLC has asked for the release of a $10,000 bond being held by the Village in lieu of security for the bid to haul sludge from the Wastewater Treatment Facility. This company is no longer the vendor.

2. Installation of Bus Shelter/Bus Bench - West Glen and North Monroe

Ms. Mailander explained that an e-mail was received from a resident who takes Bus 163, which stops at West Glen and North Monroe. This resident reported that whenever it snows this bus stop becomes dangerous, as there is nowhere to stand without being in traffic due to the snow piling up. New Jersey Transit has offered to install either a bus shelter of the Village’s choosing or a bench. The bus stop is located at the edge of the park by the tennis courts off of North Monroe Street. If the Village chooses a bus shelter as opposed to a bench, an agreement would have to be signed with New Jersey Transit. If a bus shelter is desired, Mr. Rutishauser recommended the IKEA Paramus model, which is the same one the Village selected for two, Route 17 bus stops.

The Village Council decided on the bus shelter as opposed to the bench.

3. Upgrade of County Traffic Signals

Ms. Mailander explained that several years ago, Bergen County committed to helping Ridgewood upgrade four of the Village’s municipally owned signals located on County roads. In a recent correspondence to Mr. Rutishauser, the County stated that, “Entering into an agreement committing the County to upgrade four traffic signals at once in one municipality is too large of an obligation with respect to funding and other resources. However, the County can begin to work with the municipality on one of the locations”. This location would be the intersection of North Maple Avenue and Linwood Avenue because these are both County roads. The Village would have other responsibilities including the preparation of construction plans, providing police traffic control, and continued electric service payment.

Mayor Knudsen questioned both the cost and the reason why the intersection of North Maple Avenue and Linwood Avenue was chosen over Franklin Avenue or other locations that need upgrading.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Councilwoman Walsh explained that in 2013, the County committed to three traffic signal upgrades, with the possibility of a fourth. She stated that intersections were suggested by the 2013 Village Council, but there was never any concrete decision made as to what intersections would be completed. Mr. Rutishauser explained that there has been a pull-back from the County on this commitment. He was aware that the County was currently involved in some major capital projects, and he suggested that they may be reluctant to invest capital funds elsewhere. The money to fund this commitment were not allocated to a special fund.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser explained that while the North Maple Avenue and Linwood Avenue intersection is not considered a priority by the Village, it is one of the four locations that could be upgraded relatively easily. In terms of funding, Mr. Rutishauser stated that it looks like the upgrade will cost the Village more money than originally anticipated.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Rutishauser explained that a signal upgrade to the Franklin Avenue/Maple Avenue intersection would require coordination with the signal located on Maple Avenue/East Ridgewood Avenue, which would involve extensive study. The Planning Board would also need to discuss this upgrade with the applicant currently before the Planning Board for the proposed multi-family housing in that area.

Mayor Knudsen did not want to spend the money on a traffic signal upgrade for North Maple Avenue and Linwood Avenue. She suggested going back to the County to explain that there are more serious situations involving pedestrian and vehicular safety at other intersections. She suggested the Broad Street/Franklin Avenue intersection.

Councilman Sedon said that he doesn’t see a problem with the North Maple Avenue and Linwood Avenue intersection.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Rutishauser said that the conversation with the County was through e-mail and a follow-up phone call. He will forward an invitation for a sit-down discussion with the Village and the County to discuss what the Village wants in relationship to what the County wants.

4. Accept Donation - Restoration of Sally Port - Ridgewood Police Department

Ms. Mailander explained that in 2015, capital funding was set aside for improvements to the Police Sally Port, which includes painting the walls and floors prior to installing a storage and work area. In the process of obtaining price quotes for painting, the owner of Five Star Painting, Christian Cruz, offered to donate the labor and supplies. Mr. Cruz does not have any applications before any Boards or Committees nor does he have any pending business with the Village of Ridgewood.

5. Surplus & Donation of Police Equipment

Ms. Mailander explained that the Police Department has three MPH radar units that were purchased in the early 1990’s. The hardware is no longer supported by the company. The Borough of Englewood Cliffs is still using the same brand of radar units and would like the Village to donate the units to them for parts. The value of selling this equipment at auction would be very low.

5. REVIEW OF APRIL 12, 2017 REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

Ms. Mailander stated that next week there will be four proclamations including Tree Planting Month and Arbor Day; LAX Day in Ridgewood; National Drinking Water Week; and Proclaim May as Building Safety Month.

There will be a scheduled public hearing for Ridgewood Water on Amending Chapter 269 - Water Irrigation Schedule and Water Emergencies.

Resolutions for Ridgewood Water include: Authorize Change Order - Furnish and Install Control Valves at Various Locations; Award Contract - Tree Maintenance Services; Award Contract - Water Main Replacements at Stream Crossings; Award Contract Under State Contract - Materials and Supplies - Water Main Repairs; and Authorize Change Order - Rehabilitation of Glen Avenue Tank.

The following ordinances are scheduled for introduction: General Capital Ordinance; Water Utility Capital Ordinance; Parking Utility Capital Ordinance; Amend Chapter 265 - Vehicles and Traffic- Parking Restrictions - Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road; Amend Chapter 265 - Vehicles and Traffic - Parking Restrictions - Pomander Walk; and Amend Chapter 260, Trees and Shrubs.

The scheduled public hearings include: Establish Rules and Regulations for Rental of Rooms in The Stable; Amend Chapter 145 - Fees - Establish Rental Fees - The Stable; and Repeal Chapter 29, Historic Preservation Commission, Amend Chapter 190, Land Use and Development, and Repeal Chapter 251, Swimming Pools.

There will be an introduction of the Budget and a resolution Approving 2017 Municipal Budget and Set May 10, 2017 as the Date for the Public Hearing Thereon.

Resolutions include: Approve Temporary Emergency Capital Budget; Approve Temporary Emergency Budge Appropriations; Award Contract - Conduit Installation for Traffic Signals Upgrades; Award Contract - Disposal of Recyclables; Award Contract - Gate House Sloped Entry - Irene Habernickel Family Park; Award Contract - Communications - Police Department; Award Contract - Paving; Award Professional Services Contract - Traffic Engineering Services - West Side Study Area; Authorize Shared Services Agreement - Police Pistol Range (Wood-Ridge); Reject Bids - School Bus Transportation - Summer Day Camp; Declare Police Vehicles Surplus Property; Declare Property Surplus and Authorize Donation to Englewood Cliffs Police Department; Accept Partial Donation - Portable Fuel Cell Trailer; Accept Donation - Restoration of Sally Port - Ridgewood Police Department; Support Responsible Pet Ownership; Authorize Mayor’s Pledge for Age Friendly Ridgewood Initiatives; Authorize Release of Cash Security Bond - Sludge Hauling Contract; Authorize Partial Release of Cash Bond - 143 & 147 West Glen Avenue; Authorize Cleaning of Kings Pond Park by Ridgewood Wildscape and Friends; Authorize Installation of Bus Shelter - West Glen Avenue and North Monroe Avenue; and Rescinding Resolution on the Schedler Park 90’ Baseball Field.

6. MANAGER’S REPORT

PSE&G Electrical Upgrade Project - Ms. Mailander reported that West Glen Avenue has been paved. It is the final step in finishing up the PSE&G upgrade.

Green Acres Scoping Hearing - Ms. Mailander stated that this has been scheduled for May 10^th. Legal notices were hand-delivered today by Ms. Mailander and Janet Fricke, Assistant to the Village Manager, to the four property owners who live on the former South Broad Street playground property. Three residents were home and Ms. Mailander and Ms. Fricke were able to speak to them briefly. Certified letters about the Scoping Hearing will also be mailed to all residents within 200’ of the property. The residents were informed on the intent to legalize the past diversion of the property to Belize Homes, when the property was sold to the Bergen County Housing Authority in the early 1980’s. The residents were assured that this action does not impact their property or their property ownership in any way. A legal advertisement will be published this Friday and a display advertisement will be published in a few weeks.

2017 Budget Introduction - Ms. Mailander stated that the introduction of the 2017 Budget will be held at the public meeting on April 12^th and the public hearing and consideration for adoption will be on May 10^th.

National Library Week - Ms. Mailander explained that National Library Week will be held next week. In commemoration, the Ridgewood Public Library is offering free DVD rentals for the week of April 9^th to April 15^th.

Ridgewood Recreation Department - The Graydon Pool Schedule for the upcoming season has been issued. Graydon Pool Seasonal Badges are now available for purchase on-line from Community Pass and can be accessed by clicking on the picture of Graydon Pool on the Village’s website. There will a discount if residents join before May 1^st. In addition, the Graydon Pool office will be open Saturday, May 13^th and Saturday, May 20^th from 10:00 a.m. until 12:00 noon for walking badge sales.

Shred Day - Last Saturday was the Village’s Spring Shred Day at the Recycling Center. Many thanks to the Village staff and residents for making it a big success.

Computer and Electronics Tire Recycling and Paper Shredding - This will be held by the County of Bergen on Sunday, April 9^th from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., rain or shine, at Bergen Community College in Paramus, New Jersey. Identification to prove Bergen County residency is required.

7. COUNCIL REPORTS

Library Board of Trustees - Councilman Voigt reported that the Library Board of Trustees met on March 28^th. Two new members Rei Shinozuka and Vikrant Arora were sworn in for terms ending December, 2021. There have been upgrades made to the library including a 200” projector screen for the auditorium and the addition of a new 65” television to the art studio. The budget was reviewed and Councilman Voigt commended the staff for remaining on budget every month.

Financial Advisory Committee (FAC) - Councilman Voigt reported that the FAC met on April 3^rd. The committee reviewed an analysis prepared by Alex Kisilevich, one of the FAC members, which examined the fees and fines imposed by the Village, as compared to other municipalities. Mr. Kisilevich would like to present his findings at an upcoming Village Council Work Session in May. The committee also reviewed an analysis prepared by FAC member Rei Shinozuka on kiosk vendors for the proposed kiosk pilot program on the Chestnut Street Lot. If this works well, the intention would be to potentially expand these kiosks to other streets in the CBD. Information was forwarded to Ms. Mailander for the development of an RFP.

Planning Board - Councilman Voigt reported that the Planning Board met last night. The Chestnut Village Development, located behind the YMCA/YWCA, was unanimously approved. The developer, JT Bolger, generously agreed to install sidewalks on Robinson and to incur a pro-rata share of the costs of offsite improvements, which include street lighting, signage, crosswalks and other sidewalk improvements, in and around the development itself. The next Planning Board meeting is scheduled for April 18^th. The Ken Smith Broad Street Development will be before the Planning Board that evening for site plan approval. The Dayton South Broad Street Development is scheduled to be before the Planning Board at the meeting scheduled for May 2^nd.

Ridgewood Environmental Advisory Committee (REAC) - Councilman Sedon reported that a discussion was held between REAC; Rich Calbi of Ridgewood Water; Mike Furrey, Senior Environmental Health and Water Supply Consultant; the owner of Agra Environmental; and a representative from an irrigation company that specializes in smart controllers. The discussion focused on water conversation, and there were several questions pertaining to the ordinance that will be the subject of next week’s public hearing. Councilman Sedon thanked Mr. Calbi for his participation, along with everyone who attended.

Tomorrow, at Ridgewood Library, REAC, in conjunction with the League of Women Voters, will be showing a film entitled, “Tapped”, a documentary from 2009 that explores the bottled water industry’s impact on the environment and what exactly is contained in bottled water. This event will run from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Dave Scheibner will be in attendance to discuss the film.

Councilman Sedon reminded everyone that Earth Day is April 23^rd at Van Neste Square. Earth Day is being held in conjunction with the Conservancy for Ridgewood Public Lands. There will be vendors, a dog parade, a petting zoo, and crafts. Earth Day runs from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

Ridgewood Arts Council - Councilwoman Walsh reported that Ridgewood Arts Council met last evening and continued working on Augmented Reality which will be held on Earth Day. The members also discussed artists for the Artist Salon Series.

Councilwoman Walsh explained that she was a part of the New Jersey Relocation Council, a global workforce mobility group. Each year, the New Jersey Relocation Council presents scholarships to students that have gone through a family move. A Ridgewood student, Grace McCormack, received one of these scholarships. Ms. McCormack was a Ridgewood resident who moved to Zurich, Switzerland and then came back to Ridgewood. Ms. McCormack wrote an essay describing the challenges she faced as a transfer student. Ms. McCormack wrote: “I learned the importance of asking for help and adapting to change.” Councilwoman Walsh stated that she was very proud that a student from Ridgewood received this scholarship.

Parks and Recreation - Councilman Hache reported that Parks and Recreation met on March 28^th. Two new members were sworn in: Mike Winograd, whose term expires December 31, 2017 and Bill Richter, whose term expires December 31, 2019. David Sales was reappointed as Vice Chairperson and his term expires on December 31, 2019.

Discussions focused on gardening. There will be a Community Garden Workshop entitled, “Gardening 101 - Introduction to the Basics of Gardening” presented by Chris Raimondi, President of Raimondi Horticultural Group, on Thursday, May 11^th at 5:00 p.m. at The Stable. Councilman Hache reminded everyone that the Community Garden is open and everyone is invited to the Community Garden Program at Maple Park East and Habernickel Park. The program is open to all residents, and returning participants may renew on a first-come-first-serve basis through April 28^th. The registration fee for each 10’x 12’ parcel is $50.00.  

A proposal was received from the Women Gardeners of Ridgewood to use a research room in an unused, upstairs room in the Gate House at Habernickel Park. The room will be used for the purposes of housing the group’s physical resources, which shall be made available to the community along with the expertise of the club members at arranged times every month. Councilman Hache felt this was a great use of the space.

Councilman Hache reminded everyone that tickets for the Party in the Park, the 125^th celebration of Ridgewood High School, are going on sale tomorrow, Thursday, April 6^th at 2:00 p.m.

CBD Advisory Committee - Councilman Hache reported that the CBD Advisory Committee will be meeting tomorrow morning in the Garden Room at 9:00 a.m. The discussions will include the update to the CBD website and interesting activities that the town of Westfield has been doing in their downtown area.

8. PUBLIC COMMENTS

Peter Quinn, 66 Pomander Walk, apologized for offending Mayor Knudsen earlier this evening as a result of his imprecise language. Mr. Quinn stated that it was not his intent to say that the Village Council brings out the worst in Ridgewood residents. In fact, it is quite the opposite, as the civil environment improves with each Village Council meeting he attends. Mr. Quinn pointed out that the way the residents were able to discuss the parking issue on Pomander Walk was only at the podium in three-minute sound bites. This resulted in imprecise language and accusations. There was no dialogue between residents of Sherman Place and Pomander Walk. He recognized that the Village Council did encourage such a dialogue. Mr. Quinn felt that public voices that are loud, course and imprecise tend to seem to carry more sway. If there is a perception that there is not a process, more loudness, coarseness and imprecision is invited into the civil dialogue, which is a shame. Although he did not want parking on Pomander Walk, Mr. Quinn applauded the Village Council for their thoughts and their challenging and questioning of the public. He recalled that when this issue was first discussed, he asked for a parking restriction on both sides of the street until the problem was figured out, since he considered it a safety issue. He asked for the opportunity to provide input regarding the times and days when the parking demand on Pomander Walk is at its worst. Mr. Quinn agreed that the surrounding neighbors should have been involved in the original discussion. Mr. Quinn felt that a traffic study and safety remediation on Sherman Place should be conducted first to be able to determine if bringing parking back to Pomander Walk will solve the problems of the CBD. Although he wasn’t in agreement with all his neighbors, he wanted to say unequivocally that it is not the burden of the residents to provide an overflow parking lot for the CBD. The parking problem in the CBD exists because of improper zoning. He felt that parked cars may calm traffic; however, the frequent on and off traffic is what brings the hazard.

Melanie McWilliams, 431 Bogert Avenue, expressed her anger that the proposed amendment to the parking restrictions on Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road will create an unsafe condition for children walking to school. She pointed out that the proposed parking prohibition times are not long enough to fully cover the hours for the three schools in the area. Ms. McWilliams asked for a safety study to be conducted on Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road. There is only 30’ of sidewalks in this neighborhood and these sidewalks do not meet current code requirements for width. There is no buffer between Glen Avenue and the sidewalk where the children walk to the crossing guard. Ms. McWilliams agreed that reducing the length of the restriction would be a good compromise; however, she felt the extent of the reduced length still requires children to walk around parked cars. She agreed that directing people around the island would slow people down; however, she noted that they still need to walk around the curve. Ms. McWilliams asked where she could go to request the installation of sidewalks.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, felt that the plan to move the bus station up to the train station was a great idea, as it will create a transportation hub at one location. He approved of the creation of 38 parking spaces in the process. He compared the $300,000 estimated cost of this plan to the estimated $40,000 per space cost for the construction of a garage. Thirty-eight spaces in the garage would cost more than $1.5million to construct.

Mr. Loving stated that he was totally against the construction of retail in the parking garage. He felt that the Village should not be in the business of renting out or selling commercial space. As evidenced by the number of vacant store fronts in the Village, there is no shortage of available space. Mr. Loving also noted that retail will add complexity to the garage’s construction; will require heat, ventilation, and air conditioning; and will take up parking spaces.

Mr. Loving spoke about existing parking problems in Hoboken, New Jersey. Hoboken uses automatic license plate readers to track repeat parkers. This technology records a license plate and exactly where the vehicle is parked. Mr. Loving felt investing in this technology was less expensive than the cost of a parking garage.

Mayor Knudsen pointed out that the idea of retail space in the garage was a conceptual, preliminary idea.

In regards to the parking issues, Mayor Knudsen spoke of the importance of being inclusive in a much bigger conversation in the future. She explained that the Village Council works within a system where they receive information, rely on that information, and make decisions. In the case of implementing parking restrictions, this may not have been the best approach. Everyone should work together as everyone wants a safe community.

9. RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

Deputy Village Clerk, Donna Jackson read Resolution #17-85 to go into Closed Session as follows:

12. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilman Hache, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Work Session was adjourned at 11:08 p.m.

_____________________________

                                                                                                                     Susan Knudsen      

                                                                                                                           Mayor

_____________________________

            Donna M. Jackson

        Deputy Village Clerk.

A REGULAR WORK SESSION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY ON MARCH 22, 2017 AT 7:30 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call, the following were present: Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen. Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk; Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; and Donna M. Jackson, Deputy Village Clerk.  

Mayor Knudsen led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and held a Moment of Silence for all the men and women serving our nation and all first responders.

2. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Knudsen asked if there were any comments or questions from the public.

Alyson McCormack, 51 Sherman Place, read a data report to support the suspending of Ordinance #3556 as follows:

1.)        there was no safety analysis done on Pomander Walk prior to the ordinance;

2.)        there were no vehicle accidents on Pomander Walk in the last five years which involved any safety issues;

3.)        the only reason Pomander Walk has the restriction is because it was asked for;

4.)        businesses next to Pomander Walk have expressed an extreme negative impact;

5.)          Pomander Walk service vehicles continue to use the street for their purposes, ignoring the ordinance that the residents requested and promised never to violate (at 3:30 p.m. today an oil truck was parked outside a residence next to the “No Parking” sign);

6.)        Pomander Walk restrictions are the most extreme in the Village;

7.)        this restriction forces pedestrians to park on Sherman Place and Cross over Godwin Avenue, a proven, high crash density intersection. Customers should be permitted to park on the side of the street where they belong to minimize risk.

Ms. McCormack urged the Village Council to reinstate both side of the street parking, with two-hour enforced limits as soon as possible.

Russell Forenza, 228 Emmett Place, congratulated Ms. Mailander on her appointment as Village Manager.

Mr. Forenza spoke on the importance of water conservation and the water restrictions currently in place. Mr. Forenza suggested that additional measures should be taken to conserve water, such as prohibiting residents from filling swimming pools and stopping all building in Ridgewood, Midland Park, Wyckoff and Glen Rock. Mr. Forenza felt it was important for all towns serviced by Ridgewood Water to be under water restrictions. Mr. Forenza felt that a two-day water restriction was not the right decision. He asked that additional studies be conducted to find additional water supplies, such as wells.

Mr. Forenza asked for answers on the missing coins.

Marianne Bennett, 448 Cambridge Road, thanked the Village Council for adding a discussion item to tonight’s agenda regarding repealing or amending Village Ordinance #3563, which addressed the no stopping/standing regulations recently imposed on Cambridge Road and Bogert Avenue. Ms. Bennett read from a statement stating that it was the understanding of her and her husband, Peter Bennett, that Ordinance #3563 was passed based on information and recommendations made by the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC). The Village Council was told that this ordinance had the support of the neighborhood residents; however, the overwhelming majority of residents are against this ordinance and do not feel there are any pedestrian safety issues. Being a volunteer herself, Ms. Bennett expressed her appreciation for the citizens who volunteer on the CSAC. However, she felt the best action to take in this particular instance is to leave well enough alone. Ms. Bennett asked members of the audience to raise their hands if they feel Ordinance #3563 should be abolished. She urged the Village Council to either abolish Ordinance #3563 or passing the compromising amendment previously suggested.

Chris Reid, 112 Stanley Place, stated that even though residents of Pomander Walk testified before the Village Council concerning safety issues involving on-street parking, residents and their guests and contractors continue to park on Pomander Walk. Mr. Reid presented a photograph showing three vehicles parked on Pomander Walk. Mr. Reid stated that there is no data available to back-up any safety claim that justifies a no-parking restriction on Pomander Walk. Mr. Reid felt this restriction was placing a burden on the Westside Business District, which is in contrast to the Village Council’s actions urging the support of local businesses. Mr. Reid stated that parking on Pomander Walk is safe, as evidenced by the residents parking along the street.

Under questioning by Councilman Hache, Mr. Reid stated that the photograph he presented was also included in the e-mail correspondence he sent to the Village Council.

Gail Conenello, 23 Garfield Place, stated that based on the information provided by the surrounding residents of Pomander Walk, there is absolutely no valid basis to place the most restrictive parking restrictions in the Village on Pomander Walk, and there is certainly no basis to allow these restrictions to continue. Allowing the ordinance to remain in place simply continues to unfairly place the parking burden on surrounding streets. Ms. Conenello stated that a review of the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Assessment of Traffic and Conditions in the Westside Study Area, revealed that it is designed to determine parking use and demand and “provide an estimate of the capacity of on-street parking availability, utilizing the Village’s current parking regulations found in Village Code Chapter 265”. Ms. Conenello stated that if this study is conducted without first revising the restrictions on Pomander Walk, the results of the study will be fundamentally flawed. As a resident of Garfield Place, which is located one block from George Washington Middle School, Ms. Conenello has witnessed daily pedestrian safety issues on Washington Place, Garfield Place, Sherman Place, Monroe Avenue and Godwin Avenue. Instead of conducting an expensive study, Ms. Conenello suggested implementing simple changes such as additional crosswalks, enforcement of the current, two-hour and one-side-of-the-street parking restrictions, enforcement of speed limits, and perhaps limiting parking restrictions to address real safety concerns.

Karen Bagdon, 23 Pomander Walk, stated that at a Village Council meeting in December, 2016, a decision was made indicating that before any additional changes or amendments were made to the existing ordinance, safety improvements would first be made on Sherman Place. Ms. Bagdon felt that these improvements should be implemented before any changes are made to the ordinance.

Erin Taddei, 419 Bogert Avenue, asked the Village Council to reconsider allowing parking on Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road. Ms. Taddei stated that over the 19 years she and her husband and sons have lived at this address there have never been safety issues, even during peak drop-off and pick-up times at Travell Elementary School. Ms. Taddei expressed a concern with the lack of discussions and involvement with the people most directly impacted. Ms. Taddei stated that she only found out about the parking restrictions when a sign was placed in front of her property. A few days later, she received a ticket for parking for ten minutes in front of her home.   Ms. Taddei expressed a concern that there is misrepresentation on the part of the CSAC, noting that neighbors were not consulted. Ms. Taddei spoke of the hardships these parking restrictions place on her ability to safely transport her wheelchair-bound mother-in-law in and out of the house.

Phyllis Johnson, 420 Cambridge Road, stated that in the 44 years she has lived on Cambridge Road she has never known of any safety problem in the neighborhood. Ms. Johnson stated that the parking restrictions create a great, personal hardship for her as caregivers and relatives who visit every day have no place to park. Ms. Johnson stated that, to her knowledge, there was never any neighborhood input or study requested.

Joel Torielli, 422 Bogert Avenue, thanked the Village Council for their service. Mr. Torielli also urged everyone to remain civil, noting that neighbors and friends, while passionately defending issues, tend to become divided. Mr. Torielli stated that he was in favor of limiting the parking on Bogert Avenue during the hours when students and their families walk to-and-from school. Mr. Torielli stated that the lack of sidewalks creates a safety issue as pedestrians need to walk in the road past parked vehicles.

Mr. Torielli read from Village Ordinance Section 190-79 which indicated the following standards: compliance with the proposals in the Village Master Plan and Official Map, and permitting the safe, efficient, and orderly movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Mr. Torielli urged the Village Council and the residents to come to a compromise.

Janet Torielli, 422 Bogert Avenue, stated that she was in favor of the parking regulations currently in place on Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road, making street parking illegal from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday from September to June. Ms. Torielli stated that she has witnessed people almost getting hit by cars a number of times in her years as a resident. The current regulations keep parents and students safe. Bogert Avenue does not have sidewalks, which forces people to walk in the road, and she asked the Village Council to keep this in mind when making a decision.

Bill McLoughlin, 423 Cambridge Road, stated that there has never been a safety issue with his children walking to school during the 24 years he has lived here with his family. Mr. McLoughlin felt this ordinance was unnecessary. He suggested the addition of safety improvements, such as striping, at the corner at East Glen, where Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road come into the circle. Mr. McLoughlin objected to how this change was communicated to the residents, as many only found out about it when signs were erected along the street. He questioned why the length of the parking restriction was 500’. He asked that additional discussions be held on this issue.

Melanie McWilliams, 431 Bogert Avenue, identified herself as a Ridgewood Planning Board member and the Safety Chairperson at Travell School, both volunteer positions. She has attended CSAC meetings and Village Council meetings for over 8 years to ask that some safety measures be placed on these streets. When shown over 90 photographs, Board of Education President Sheila Brogan and CSAC members felt the issue should be brought before the Village Council. The Village Council legally noticed the community in the newspaper about this ordinance. The engineers for the Village, using maps, State standards, and engineering, determined the distance and spacing for the ordinance. Ms. McWilliams was not involved in these determinations. Ms. McWilliams stated at a previous Village Council meeting, she offered to help notify any neighbors of this ordinance, but the ultimate responsibility to do so was never addressed to her nor should it have been. It is the government’s responsibility to adequately notify neighbors. Ms. McWilliams expressed disbelief that her efforts to protect neighborhood students and their families would be challenged by residents before the Village Council. She has needed to hire an attorney to protect herself. Ms. McWilliams stated that she has been unable to find one single, documented, or provable hardship related to the ordinance. She has shared over 300 photographs with the Village Council that detailed the safety issues on the street. The ordinance may not be popular but it is necessary. If a traffic study is conducted on Pomander Walk, a traffic study should also be conducted on Bogert Place and Cambridge Road. Ms. McWilliams felt that granting any change without consulting with residents who claim a hardship is circumventing the system. The dangers on the curve do not evaporate with the time of day. These dangers diminish only when no vehicles are parked on the curves, ever. Ms. McWilliams urged the Village Council to extend the ordinance to dusk (6:00 p.m.) and for it to remain in place all year for the protection of pedestrians, bicyclists and people attending events at Travell School.

Peter Quinn, 66 Pomander Walk, appreciated the passion and zeal of his surrounding neighbors; Mr. Quinn clarified that he was the resident who stated that he would not park on the street, and he has kept his word. Residents have been sharing driveways instead of parking on the street, and he suggested that the photos presented depict trade vehicles being parked along the street. He disagreed with the statement that Pomander Walk has the most restrictive parking in the Village, as he felt streets where parking is never allowed are the most restrictive, like Godwin Avenue. Mr. Quinn stated that he would like to have an opportunity to discuss a solution to the parking and safety concerns in both areas.

Bridget Kong, 69 Sherman Place, stated that based on the information supplied by residents to the Village Council showing that there are no documented safety concerns on Pomander Walk and the negative impact on nearby streets and residences, the Village Council should revisit the prior Village Council’s complete ban and find a long-term solution for all concerned parties. She questioned why a wide dead-end street abutting the CBD had the strictest parking ban in Ridgewood, from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., 365 days a year. Logic would dictate that this street must have an exceptional safety issue that differentiates it from all other streets; however, this is not the case. Ms. Kong felt there was no basis for granting this ban, and given the shortage of parking in town and the controversy surrounding its solution, she questioned how legal parking spots can be eliminated. Pomander Walk residents have demonstrated that they need these parking spots, too. Ms. Kong felt that Ordinance #3556 has set a dangerous precedent, as residents who want to ban parking in front of their homes have a strong basis for requesting and obtaining such a restriction. Prior to the ordinance being voted through by the last Village Council, surrounding businesses in nearby streets asked for the issue to be tabled so that the impact could be fully understood and studied. In the alternative, residents pleaded for a compromise to allow one-side-of-the-street parking on Pomander Walk so that the entire burden wouldn’t be forced across Godwin Avenue. Since the ordinance was enacted, residents have come before the Village Council repeatedly and corresponded regularly, asking that the ordinance be revisited giving its negative impact on neighboring streets, neighboring businesses and pedestrians, as well as the repeated violations. Ms. Kong felt that the ordinance was granted without merit or evidence of a problem and without forethought for the impact it would have. Ordinance #3556 provides relief to a handful of residents with unsubstantiated concerns and has a negative impact on the masses. Ms. Kong urged the Village Council to suspend Ordinance #3556 during the traffic study process and to allow one-side-of-the-street parking.

Laura Christenson, 421 Ponfield Place, stated that she has lived on Ponfield Place, which is located at the end of Bogert Place, for 21 years and, as a pedestrian, she has almost been hit by a car many times either because of cars speeding around the corner, or because of cars parked along both sides of the roadway. Ms. Christenson urged the Village Council not to remove the parking restrictions on Bogert Place.

Ryan McWilliams, 431 Bogert Avenue, asked for the Village Council to consider placing sidewalks along Bogert Place and Cambridge Road if parking is going to be permitted. He has lived on Bogert Avenue for 8 years and he has observed safety issues while walking from Glen Avenue to his house.

3. PRESENTATION
4. Finance Advisory Committee (FAC) assessment in Paying for a Parking Garage

Councilman Voigt, Village Council Liaison to the FAC; FAC members Evan Weitz, Brian Lahey, and Charlie DeMarco; and C.F.O. Robert Rooney were present.

Mayor Knudsen pointed out that the Village Councilmembers had the opportunity to review the material before tonight’s presentation.

Mr. Lahey thanked Mr. Rooney for all his help throughout the process. Mr. Lahey addressed the potential costs and revenue of a parking garage. Most of the information contained in the presentation was obtained from a study that the Walker Parking Consulting Group conducted for the Village in 2015. There were also a couple of parking statistics from a 2002 parking study conducted by Rich and Associates Parking Consultants for the Village, as well as current financial statements from the Village Parking Utility. The Walker Report studied the original proposal of a 350 parking space garage on Hudson Street.

The Village’s Parking Utility operates with an annual surplus of approximately $500,000, which has been relatively constant over the last two years. The originally proposed garage would result in additional net costs to the Parking Utility, on a standalone basis, of approximately $700,000 annually. This cost includes the approximate operating costs, debt service costs, and additional net revenues. The Parking Utility in aggregate can continue to remain self-sufficient with the inclusion of a garage, as long as additional revenue is raised through a combination of new sources, extending parking hours and meaningful rate increases.

Mr. Lahey described the current economics of the Parking Utility as it stands now. The annual revenues are approximately $1.1 million. The on-street meters represent approximately one-half of this amount. The other half comes from off-street parking lots, parking permits, and miscellaneous other fees. The annual expenses related to the Parking Utility are approximately $700,000. The majority of these expenses are coming from allocations that the Village makes from other Village Departments, such as the Police Department, Maintenance Department, and Finance Department. The remaining annual surplus is turned over to the General Fund of the Village.

Mr. Lahey described the inventory of parking within the Village. The Walker Study indicated a total inventory in the downtown area at just under 3,100 parking spots in aggregate. Close to two-thirds of these parking spots are located in privately owned, off-street lots. There are 1,141 parking spaces located on Village property, with approximately half located on-street and half located off-street in lots, including the train station. The Walker Study delineated the parking area of the Village into two areas; a core area (the more desirable locations) and a non-core area. The core area starts at the train station on Broad Street, stretches down Ridgewood Avenue past Van Neste Square to Walnut Street, and then goes one block north and south of Ridgewood Avenue.  

Mr. Lahey explained that the Walker Study considered the occupancy of each of the core areas at different times of the day. The core area weekday occupancy rate was at 82% at 10:00 a.m.; 75% at 2:00 p.m., and 82% in the evening, as compared to 66% at 10:00 a.m.; 68% at 2:00 p.m.; and 64% in the evening for the non-core areas. There was not a great difference between the parking occupancy rate in the studies conducted in 2015 and 2002, with the 2002 study having more occupied parking spaces.

The Walker Study indicated a higher occupancy rate during the evening weekend hours, particularly in the core area. The core area weekend occupancy rate was 69% at 10:00 a.m.; 79% at 2:00 p.m., and 92% in the evening. The non-core area weekend occupancy rate was 47% at 10:00 a.m.; 55% at 2:00 p.m., and 59% in the evening.  Mr. Lahey noted that another reason for the non-core area being less busy was the reduced number of commuters on a weekend. Mr. Lahey noted that some blocks within the core area will run at a higher occupancy rate than others and some blocks within the non-core area will run at a lower occupancy rate than others.

Mr. Lahey addressed the 350 space garage proposed for Hudson Street. The total construction cost for the garage was approximately $12 million ($34,000 per space). Mr. Lahey noted that another proposal option was a 400+ space garage with an approximate cost of $13 million. The annual debt service cost, at an estimated rate of 3% over 20 years, was $700,000. The annual operating costs were estimated at $270,000. The total annual incremental costs of both financing and running the garage was approximately $1 million annually. A 350 space garage would result in an additional capacity of 274 spaces (350 spaces minus the 76 spaces currently located on the surface lot). The annual estimated additional revenue from these 274 spaces was $300,000. The Walker Report did not model any new demand coming through the system. These additional revenues represent demand that is already existing effectively elsewhere in the system from the Brogan Cadillac Lot and the Ken Smith Lot and assumes that the non-resident parking that was previously available will return with the garage. It also includes reallocations of existing spots that may be going from less desirable locations into a garage. On a pure standalone basis, the garage would result in an additional net cost to the Parking Utility of $700,000 annually.

Mr. Lahey reported on the potential impact on finances. The current Parking Utility’s annual surplus of $500,000 is not sufficient to cover the additional net costs of $700,000 for a parking garage. In order to maintain the Parking Utility as self-sustaining, additional revenues would need to be raised to cover operating and debt service costs. The ultimate amount of additional revenue required would likely be dependent on debt service coverage covenants within the financing arrangements. The Walker Report estimated that there would need to be 50% more revenues than interest costs (1.6+ debt service). Mr. Lahey pointed out that these figures are based upon the Village financing the garage. A public/private partnership could be considered; however, the economics in terms of revenues in this instance would likely be similar. There would also be a shift in the risks and benefits involved, if the Village did not maintain 100% ownership.

Mr. Lahey explained that the Walker Report proposed raising rates on existing parking to not only cover financing and the costs of the garage, but to also take into account that a more desirable parking spot in a more desirable area would support a higher rate. The rate proposed for the core area would double from $.50 per hour to $1.00 per hour. The rate proposed for the non-core area would increase from $.50 per hour to $.75 per hour. The Walker Report also recommended extending parking hours from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. to increase revenue. All these changes would result in an additional $900,000 to $1.1 million a year in revenue. Combining this with existing economics within the Parking Utility, plus the cost of the garage, the Parking Utility would be self-sustaining.

Mr. Lahey noted that many other factors beyond financial also need to be considered, such as business growth, adequate parking for shopping and dining, Village vibrancy and reputation, the attractiveness of the Village as a place for commuters, parking accessibility, public good, affordability, and sustainability.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Lahey stated that both the core and non-core areas will have parking hours extended from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the higher rate.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Lahey explained that the proposal to raise rates and extend hours estimates a continuing annual surplus of $500,000 for the Parking Utility.

Councilman Voigt suggested getting input from the restaurant owners, who may not want customers to have to get up and put money in a parking meeting during their stay.

Councilman Sedon questioned how the $500,000 annual surplus was calculated. Mr. Lahey explained that the FAC looked at data from 2015 and 2016. In both 2015 and 2016, the Parking Utility had annual revenues of approximately $1.2 million, and budget expenses on an operating basis of approximately $700,000, most of which was in allocations with other Village Departments. Councilman Sedon felt it was very important to calculate this surplus using the accounting methods of a municipality. He noted that if a surplus of $500,000 already exists and the expenses total $700,000, only $200,000 would have to be raised, allowing for a smaller increase in the parking rates; for instance, $.75 an hour across the board. Mr. Lahey stated that he will consult with Mr. Rooney on this issue.

Councilwoman Walsh noted that the Parking Utility’s surplus funds are currently being allocated to other budgets within the Village, and she questioned whether these surplus funds would remain in the Parking Utility’s budget.   Mr. Lahey explained that the report details how the Parking Utility could remain self-sustaining with the addition of a parking garage. Councilwoman Walsh spoke of the importance of knowing this information because budget considerations would need to be made for those departments who depended on these surplus funds.

Under questioning by Councilwoman Walsh, Mr. Lahey explained that the revenue figures from the operation of the garage were obtained from the Walker Report.

Councilwoman Walsh pointed out that the proposed multi-family developments currently before the Planning Board must be considered when assumptions are made on parking demand. Mr. Lahey agreed.

Councilman Hache felt some of the information contained in the report needed to be updated. The garage size is now closer to 240-250 spaces, bringing construction costs closer to $10 million. The figures must also take into account that the new design of the garage will include 2,300 square feet of retail space. At $40.00 per square foot, this would bring in an additional $92,000 in revenue. The smaller garage would also reduce the annual debt service cost. Mr. Lahey stated that he will update his report, as soon as this information is available.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Lahey explained that when the zero cost of the 76 existing parking spaces is taken into consideration, the total construction costs for the parking garage is $43,000 per parking space. The $34,000 construction cost per parking space contained within the report was based on 350 total spaces.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Lahey explained that the Walker Report did not assume any new demands for parking. It did assume that the demand for non-resident parking permits would increase.

Mayor Knudsen questioned how high parking fees can be raised before there is a negative impact on businesses. Mr. Lahey felt that consideration would have to be made to both cost and hours.

At the request of Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Lahey explained that the social considerations listed in the report; accessibility, public good, affordability and sustainability, indicate a desire to balance self- sufficiency with affordability, and the public good.

Mayor Knudsen noted that the Parking Utility’s budget expense allocations are based on the time personnel from other Village Departments spend working in that department.   The addition of a garage could potentially create an increase in these time allocations. Mr. Lahey stated that the data assumes that the current allocations remain and does not anticipate a major change, such as the garage.

Mayor Knudsen thanked Mr. Lahey and the FAC for all their hard work.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mayor Knudsen felt it would be better to wait until additional information is available before authorizing an updated study.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Rooney explained that there were years when the Parking Utility had deficits generated by defalcation. After the defalcation ended and an insurance reimbursement was received, a sufficient surplus was generated. In 2014, there was a surplus of approximately $400,000; at the end of 2015, the surplus was approximately $1.2 million which included the approximate amount of $700,000 from insurance proceeds. The Village decided to reimburse the General Fund for all the years the Village had to fund the deficits, which resulted in a surplus of approximately $100,000 for this year. Normally, the Parking Utility’s surplus and revenue remain relatively flat. The surplus at the end of 2016 was approximately $725,000. Revenue collections were flat on meters. There were some issues with the Park and Ride, but those issues have since been resolved. Mr. Rooney confirmed that surplus money can be used to offset increases in other funds, if necessary.

Under questioning by Councilman Sedon, Mr. Rooney stated that Parking Utility revenue collections for 2015 were approximately $1.2 million dollars. In 2016, the total revenue collections increased by approximately $20,000.

Mr. Rooney stated that data such as current interest rates and rate structures need to be analyzed before going forward.

4. DISCUSSION
5. Ridgewood Water

                        1.)        Change Order - Furnish and Install Control Valves at Various                          Locations

 

Village Manager Heather Mailander explained that the sole bid for this project in 2016 was from CFM Construction. This is a Change Order for an additional $26,960, which is required to complete work beyond the original contract scope. This represents a 9.6% increase and it is allocated in the Water Utility Capital Budget.

1. Parking         

                        1.)        Cambridge and Bogert Parking Restrictions

Mayor Knudsen expressed her appreciation to the residents for taking the time to come out and voice their opinions and concerns before the Village Council. Mayor Knudsen also thanked CSAC Chairman Charlie DeMarco for providing her with copies of CSAC meeting minutes specific to Cambridge Road and Bogert Avenue.

Mayor Knudsen stated that on or about September 15, 2016, there was a discussion at a CSAC meeting concerning the implementation of traffic calming stripes, offset from the curb at 36”. This topic came before the Village Council at the October 5^th Work Session, and voted by consent agenda on October 12^th under Resolution #16-317. Mayor Knudsen noted that these stripes have not yet been painted. Village Engineer, Christopher Rutishauser, understood that Resolution #16-317 was adopted; however, after further discussions with the Ridgewood Police Department, it was noted that without a no-parking ordinance there is nothing preventing a vehicle from obstructing the striped area, forcing pedestrians into the roadway, which went against the ordinance’s intent to improve motorist awareness of pedestrians. These stripes were proposed to be located on the outside of the curved portions of Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road, for a distance of 500’ to 800’.        

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser confirmed that parked vehicles can be a traffic calming measure because they constrict the traffic way for moving vehicles. However, considerations must be made for pedestrians walking in the street.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, Mr. Rutishauser explained that from the curb 10’ back is a public right-of-way under the Village’s control. Mayor Knudsen suggested the installation of a non-traditional pedestrian pathway made of environmentally friendly, rubberized material. Mr. Rutishauser stated that anything placed in the public right-of-way must comply with Americans with Disabilities (ADA) requirements. He also pointed out that it must be clear whether the abutting property owners or the Village would be responsible for maintenance. Mayor Knudsen understood it would be the property owner. Mr. Rutishauser noted that running a pathway around a tree may result in an encroachment onto private property, which may require an easement.

Mayor Knudsen asked Mr. Rutishauser to explain the need for a 500’ distance, when discussions were focused around the circular portion of Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road. Mr. Rutishauser explained that the distance was determined by the definition of an intersection and the required setback. Also considered was if parents would feel comfortable parking far away in order to discharge their children. The distance could be shortened by a few hundred feet; however, the arc of the curve must be avoided because it is considered an intersection.

Councilman Voigt suggested eliminating some of the shrubs to create a pedestrian pathway. Mr. Rutishauser stated there are also shade trees in this area. He will discuss this issue with the Village Attorney.

Councilman Sedon suggested restricting parking around the curve only during drop-off and pick-up times. Mr. Rutishauser stated that this is possible.

Councilwoman Walsh thanked the residents and the members of the CSAC for their input. Councilwoman Walsh suggested restricting parking only in the area where the line of sight would be obstructed from a vehicle entering the curve. Mr. Rutishauser explained that from an engineering perspective, the no-parking restriction needs to extend to where traffic is stabilized from turning movements and also to a point where pedestrians could remain comfortably against the curb while walking.   Mr. Rutishauser explained that the area coming off of Glen Avenue where the road splits and where there is a small traffic circle, is considered an intersection and parking is not permitted.

Councilman Hache noted that the main concern is safety. He felt that there is a potential need for a crossing guard in the area of Glen Avenue. Councilman Hache suggested painting jogging lanes along the roadway and to allow vehicles to park on the outside of these lanes on one side of the street. Mr. Rutishauser expressed a concern that the pedestrian comfort zone would not be wide enough. Councilman Hache agreed with restricting parking only to school drop-off and school pick-up times.

Mayor Knudsen asked that discussions continue on this issue to find a compromise. She emphasized that this is a safety initiative and urged everyone to remain civil and decent and kind.

A discussion was held on how the Village Councilmembers wished to proceed. Councilman Sedon pointed out that since half-day kindergarten will exist until the end of the school year, the current parking restrictions should remain in place. He suggested waiting until May to introduce an ordinance and waiting until June to vote on it. Mayor Knudsen referred to an e-mail she received from a resident, indicating that her street is absorbing all the traffic. Because of this situation, Mayor Knudsen suggested introducing an ordinance earlier and then deciding when to vote on it. Councilwoman Walsh spoke of the importance of parking regulations being consistent throughout the Village. Mayor Knudsen suggested restricting parking at all times beginning at the intersection for a distance of 50’, and restricting parking only during school drop-off and pick-up times from that point until the 500’ point delineated by Mr. Rutishauser.

                        2.)        Train Station Parking Lot

Mayor Knudsen shared an idea to reduce two existing grassy areas in the train station lot to allow for the addition of approximately 30-40 centrally located parking spaces. Trees along this area are dead and drainage would not be effected. Councilman Voigt felt this would be a good idea and he asked Mr. Rutishauser to determine costs and a time table. Councilman Sedon also agreed. Councilwoman Walsh noted that the speed of vehicles coming down Wilsey Square and the flow of traffic may be the biggest challenge. Mayor Knudsen noted that reserve angle parking could be implemented in this area. Councilwoman Walsh stated that she liked the grass median and she was concerned with the reduction of green space. Mayor Knudsen said the area is wide enough to still maintain a green area. Mr. Rutishauser stated that he will first check to see if there are any implications from the State Historic Preservation Office.

3.)        Pomander Walk

Mayor Knudsen referred to a packet the Councilmembers received from residents Alyson McCormack and Chris Reid requesting to either rescind Ordinance #3556 or to suspend the parking restriction on one side of the street in the interim.

Councilman Sedon stated that he was in favor of the original ordinance because it took so long and the people living on Pomander Walk went through the process. However, he was willing to revisit the issue, noting that there have been problems on surrounding streets. Councilman Sedon was in favor of one-side-of-the-street parking.

Under questioning by Mayor Knudsen, CSAC Chairman, Charlie DeMarco explained that in March, 2016 the Pomander Walk issue was brought before the committee. At that time, the residents reported problems with accessing and exiting their driveways; safe passage on the street; circulation of vehicles on the dead-end street; emergency access; snow and leaf removal; and minor car accidents. These concerns were referred to the Ridgewood Police Department and the Engineer’s Office for further study. Mr. DeMarco noted that at that time, the existing regulation was for two-hour parking. It is very difficult for the Police Department to enforce this regulation as they must visit the area constantly. To address their operational and safety concerns, the residents of Pomander Walk requested that parking be restricted on their street for most of the day.

Mr. Rutishauser added that he sent out a poll of the residents on this issue. Most of the residents responded and they were unanimously in favor of tighter restrictions to address what they perceived to be safety and operational problems.

Mayor Knudsen noted that restricting parking on one street can create or exacerbate parking problems on neighboring streets. There is a pedestrian issue, as well. As with anything in the community, we must share the burden as well as share the benefit.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Rutishauser stated that he has received two traffic study proposals, which he will review and report his recommendations to Ms. Mailander for presentation to the Village Council. Ms. Mailander stated that this report should be available for the April 5^th meeting. She noted that a new ordinance would be needed to suspend parking on one side of the street and this would not go into effect until June, 2017.

Councilman Voigt spoke of the importance of obtaining a very good understanding of what is occurring in this area from both a parking supply standpoint and a parking demand standpoint. A determination must be made as to where there are gaps, as well as where there is a possibility of putting either employees, patrons or commuters in places that are less obtrusive. Councilman Voigt cautioned against making changes in one area that will create problems in another. He offered to speak to residents in an effort to truly understand the parking issues in the area.

Noting that there are parking enforcement issues throughout the Village, Councilwoman Walsh felt it was important to identify the safety concerns that led to all the parking restriction issues in the Village. She felt that a traffic study would identify some of the concerns, but not all of them.

Mayor Knudson noted that the RFP contemplates only the current parking regulations. This would mean that the study would not consider parking on Pomander Walk. Mr. Rutishauser explained that the consultant may recommend changes to Pomander Walk, as well as other streets. He also understood that some of the dynamics of the area will be changing, as now there will be a tenant in the Red Cross Building. This may create additional demands on traffic and parking.

Councilman Hache felt a traffic study is needed for this area. He pointed out that the entire area experiences traffic problems whenever there is construction work within the intersections, particularly because George Washington School is located in this area. Some of streets have dangerous corners and tall hedges that impede pedestrian safety. Councilman Hache was also concerned with limiting parking, with so few parking spaces available.

Mayor Knudsen pointed out that on-street parking is needed in residential areas to accommodate visitors and service vehicles. Mayor Knudsen referred to documentation submitted by residents to support their requests for no parking along Pomander Walk. Upon review of this documentation, Mayor Knudsen did not feel any of the issues presented required such a restrictive approach. She felt that, at some point, the Village Council shouldn’t wait for a study to be conducted before offering residents some relief.

Mr. DeMarco explained that the CSAC has a policy not to discuss complaints from residents regarding someone parking in front of their house. Safety and operational issues are discussed and referred to the Police Department and the Engineering Department for recommendations and then forwarded to the Village Council. He agreed with Councilman Voigt’s statement that if there were more parking spaces available within the Village, there would be less parking on residential streets. Mr. DeMarco stated that he was in favor of “quick fixes” on streets such as Sherman Place, so safety issues are addressed in a timely manner.

It was the consensus of the Village Council to introduce an ordinance creating one-side-of-the-street parking on Pomander Walk. The ordinance will be introduced at the public hearing scheduled for April 12^th.

1. Operations

                        1.)        Citizens Safety Advisory Committee - Standardized Form for                                        Requesting Parking Changes

Mayor Knudsen explained that during her “Meet the Mayor Session”, a conversation with a resident and a member of the CSAC resulted in an idea to create a standardized form for requesting parking changes.

Mayor Knudsen called the Councilmembers attention to a draft copy of the proposed form. The form will serve as a “traveling file” documenting information from everyone involved in the process. The form identifies the name and contact information of the person making the request and includes the substantiated existing safety issues; any supporting documents such as police reports; current conditions; a copy of the current ordinance; a copy of the new ordinance; what other less restrictive traffic calming ideas were implemented beforehand; and comments from the School Safety Committee, Engineering Department, Police Department and CSAC.

Mayor Knudsen pointed out that the form would also require the names of everyone who was notified and the method of this notification. Even though legal notifications are always published, Mayor Knudsen felt that a better job of notification is needed at the early stages of the conversation.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mayor Knudsen said that this form would be given to the Village Councilmembers for their review when the discussion is placed on the agenda. It will not only help them identify the people impacted, but any potential impact on other people if a change is made.

Councilman Voigt liked this idea. Under his questioning, Mayor Knudsen explained that the form would initially be given to a person when they present their concerns before CSAC. She noted that there is a representative of the Police Department on CSAC who could then take the form and attach any supporting documents concerning accident reports or complaints. A discussion followed on who would take responsibility for storing and updating the file. It was noted that it could be on-line. Councilman Sedon felt it was important to get input from CSAC members. Councilman Hache felt the form would represent a “living, breathing document” which the Councilmembers could use to learn how the issue evolved through the process.

Under questioning by Councilwoman Walsh, Village Attorney Matthew Rogers explained that Ridgewood always satisfies the legal requirements for notification. The Village also goes beyond the legal requirements of notification by using outlets such as Facebook and the Village website. Mr. Rogers suggested that sub-committees such as CSAC discuss the best ways to get the word out about what they do and when they meet, so people can have the opportunity to voice their concerns. He suggested relying on a particular member of the community to spread the word.

Mr. DeMarco felt that the description of the safety issue should not be the burden of the resident. He felt the draft form has terms that the general public would not understand. He wanted to give more thought to the CSAC comment and position section, as he didn’t understand what the Village Council would do with this information. He suggested utilizing this form closer to the introduction of an ordinance. Mayor Knudsen explained that this draft form reflects information the Village Council could use to avoid future controversies, as well as ensuring that residents do not feel left out, not part of the conversation, or ignored.

1. Budget

                        1.)        Partial Donation - Portable Fuel Cell Trailer - Parks & Recreation

Ms. Mailander explained that the portable fuel cell trailer will be used to transport diesel fuel on the back of a pick-up truck. The current trailer is rusted out. The trailer is used to refuel the portable light towers, the generator at the Northwest Bergen Central Dispatch Emergency Services, as well as other various pieces of equipment owned by the Village. Maroons Soccer Association, Ridgewood Soccer Association, and Ridgewood Junior Football Association will donate $3,050 towards this purchase. The Parks and Recreation Department will be responsible for the remainder of $2,428.00, for a total price of $5,478.00.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Ms. Mailander explained that the sports groups made donations because they use the portable light towers. The fuel cell trailer will be used by the Village for other purposes.

                        2.)        Partial Release of Cash Bond

Ms. Mailander explained that the Village has received a request to release $33,216 of a $37,970 cash bond held for JP Development, Inc. The two-lot subdivision at 143 and 147 West Glen Avenue is substantially complete. The first house is sold. The remainder of the bond will be released when the second house is sold.

                        3.)        Award of Contract - Conduit Installation for Traffic Signals Upgrades

Ms. Mailander explained that the Traffic and Signal Division has been planning several upgrades and repairs to two traffic signals in the Village. One light is at Maple Avenue and East Ridgewood Avenue. The second light is at South Maple Avenue and Prospect Street. The work requires trenching across the intersection and installing conduit through which wires can be pulled. Three quotes were received. The lowest quote was from ConQuest Construction in the amount of $25,325 and it is in the Capital Account.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Mr. Rutishauser explained that the upgrade includes moving an overhead wire underground, as required by Code, at the light located at South Maple Avenue and Prospect Street, and the relocation of a signal control box on East Ridgewood Avenue and Maple Avenue because it is too close to Jersey Mikes and the ramp. As funds become available, the actuated lights will be upgraded, bulbs will be replaced, and pedestrian countdowns will be added at critical locations.

            4.)        Award of Two Year Contract - Disposal of Recyclables

Ms. Mailander explained that the recycling market has gone down, and the Village’s revenues have decreased. The current contract gives the Village a $60 floor price for corrugated; a $60 floor price for paper; and a $25 floor price for commingled. The new contract gives the Village a $40.00 floor price for corrugated; a $35 floor price for paper; and a -$10 floor price for commingled. The two proposal received were from Atlantic Coast Fibers and Waste Management and both came in with the exact same offer. The Village has had a very good working relationship with Atlantic Coast Fibers and the recommendation is to continue doing business with them.

Ms. Mailander stated that the contract is a two-year contract with three, one-year options. The worst case scenario would represent an annual revenue of $74,483; a reduction of $115,177. This reduction in revenue would need to be made up elsewhere in the budget.

Under questioning by Councilman Hache, Ms. Mailander stated that the plastic food containers continue to be non-recyclable.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Ms. Mailander stated that the Village can only anticipate revenue by what is received, but in this case the revenue will probably be anticipated because it is reduced.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Ms. Mailander did not feel the cost for commingled recyclables would change if someone separated them since the market is in China and they have become very particular to what they will accept.

            5.)        Shared Services - Wood Ridge Pistol Range

Ms. Mailander explained that this is a shared services agreement to use the Wood Ridge Police Range for an annual fee of $150.00 per officer or retired officer on the roster, payable by May 1^st of each year. Ridgewood would supply their own targets and ammunition. The Village would also obtain insurance coverage naming Wood Ridge as “Other Insured” and each municipality would have a Hold Harmless Agreement for the other. The Wood Ridge Police Range has the standards required for the Ridgewood Police Department to conduct their mandatory annual firearms qualifications.

1. Policy

            1.)        Respect, Give It to Get It Campaign

Jan Phillips, a member of The Community Relations Advisory Board of Ridgewood and Glen Rock (CRAB), explained that the mission of this board is to encourage a welcoming, inclusive, and sensitive approach to the challenges of a multi-cultural society. Their mission includes the development of programs that promote intercultural communication and understanding through programs, dialogues, and campaigns, and to provide support to victims of bias-related crimes, encouraging them to support such incidents. Their vision is a society built on lives of dignity and self-respect. Attenders and members are from both Ridgewood and Glen Rock and include teachers, students, parents, clergy, police officers, school board members, mental health professionals, members of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday Celebration Committee, Bergen Community College, the Ridgewood Indian Association and the Student Gay-Straight Alliance. The youngest member is 13 years old and the oldest member is 90. CRAB was formed in the 1990’s following a racial incident at the border of Ridgewood and Glen Rock.

Several years ago, CRAB developed the “Respect, Give It to Get It Campaign”. CRAB holds the belief that basic respect is the common ground of a healthy community, the stepping blocks toward trust, and a cornerstone to civility. CRAB used a consensus to create a poster that high school students in Glen Rock and Ridgewood distributed throughout schools, houses of worship, retail businesses and offices. The campaign was expanded to reach out to victims who might be intimated due to their immigration status. The campaign included a series of six dialogues regarding civility, and Ridgewood became the first municipality in New Jersey to embrace the Upstander Campaign.   CRAB and the Ridgewood Village Council united on the notion that inclusion and respect are community values, as evidenced by the flying of the rainbow flag, representing gay rights and straight allies, for 24 hours in support of the people killed in the Orlando, Florida nightclub shooting on June 12, 2016.

On behalf of CRAB, Ms. Phillips asked for the rainbow flag to be flown again at Village Hall from June 1^st until June 30^th.   This request is supported by the Ridgewood Chamber of Commerce, the Ridgewood Guild, the Clemente Foundation, Joan and Joe Clemente, Garden State Equality, the New Jersey Gay Chamber of Commerce, and the Bergen County LGBTQ Advisory Board to the Bergen County Freeholders.

Ms. Phillips stated that CRAB will meet again on April 19^th with their sponsors to promote this kind of symbolic support for inclusion and would like the support of the Village Council.

            2.)        Ridgecrest - Graydon Pricing         

Mayor Knudsen stated that Sue Ulrich from Ridgecrest Apartments raised the question of making available some free days to senior citizens who otherwise couldn’t afford to attend Graydon Pool in the summer. Mayor Knudsen felt this was a great idea.

Councilman Hache pointed out that this idea was raised by a 12-year-old resident while doing his Mitzvah project. The project produced other suggestions such as having a “Graydon Day” for Seniors, which would include lunch at the Waterside Café, or a picnic. Councilman Hache felt the idea would be great for the community and he suggested doing it for more than one day.

Councilwoman Walsh agreed that this is a great idea that shows support for Seniors.

Ms. Mailander stated that she will contact Nancy Bigos, Assistant Director of Recreation, Tim Cronin, Director of Parks and Recreation, and Ms. Ulrich to get all the details needed to prepare a memorializing resolution and report back to the Village Council.

            3.)        Schedler Park Plans

Councilman Sedon felt that the current Village Council is not in agreement with the development of the Schedler Property as detailed in Resolution #15-257. He recommended repealing Resolution #15-257 and for the Village Council to work with the Parks and Recreation Department to come up with a new plan and a new resolution.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Councilman Sedon explained that the new resolution would be completely different. From the time the Schedler Property was purchased in 2008-2009 to the adoption of Resolution #15-257 in 2015, there was no official resolution, description or memorialization concerning its development. It does not make sense to retain this resolution while a new plan is being put together.

Mayor Knudsen pointed out that there is matching grant money available for clean-up and that a sound study has been completed.  

Mayor Knudsen felt the plan should be more community oriented. She referred to an article given to her by Board of Trustee, Sheila Brogan, that described community oriented parks that accommodate everyone in a natural setting, from youngsters to senior citizens, with amenities such as walking paths, tai chi platforms, and playgrounds.

Councilman Hache suggested forming an ad hoc committee to help incorporate the view of the community. Mayor Knudsen agreed.

Ms. Mailander recalled that when Habernickel Park was formed, it involved the Parks and Recreation Department in conjunction with the Open Space Committee and the Fields Committee. This group could work with any residents’ committees that may also exist. Ms. Mailander stated that this dynamic will be worked out within the next week or so.

Mr. Rogers will draft a resolution repealing Resolution #15-257.

1. Operations

                        1.)        Kings Pond Area Cleaning Program

Ms. Mailander stated that the Village is very fortunate to have volunteers from the Ridgewood Wildscape Association clean-up various areas in the Village. These volunteers have offered to clean the Kings Pond area on Sunday, April 30, 2017 between 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. This type of community involvement assists with the Village’s storm water protection program. The Village will provide personal protective equipment for the volunteers including chest waders, gloves, rakes, and hand tools. The Village will also pick-up and dispose of accumulated debris. Additional volunteers are welcome.

                        2.)        Village Traffic Consultant

Mayor Knudsen stated that there have been two responses back from the RFP for this extensive study. She recommended going out for a Request for Qualification (RFQ) to appoint the same traffic consultant used by the Ridgewood Planning Board, John Jahr, as a traffic consultant.

6. MANAGER’S REPORT

Budget Meetings - Ms. Mailander reminder everyone that the final budget meeting will be held on Monday, March 27^th at 5:30 p.m. in the Courtroom. The agenda will include discussions on the Capital Budget, final questions on any of the other budgets, staffing, and revenue. Scenarios will be presented to the Village Council to choose which one they would like to proceed with.

Snow Removal - Ms. Mailander spoke about the recent snow storm. Ms. Mailander praised the Village Staff, many of whom worked 12 hour shifts removing snow and laying down salt. Snow removal work was conducted in the Central Business District for two nights from 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Ms. Mailander will have figures on cost and the amount of snow moved available at the April 15^th meet. Ms. Mailander thanked the residents who stayed off the road on the day of the storm and the businesses who removed snow and ice from their sidewalks. She also thanked the residents for bringing their garbage to the end of their driveways and noted that rear yard garbage pick-up should begin again on Monday.

PSE&G Electrical Upgrade Project - Ms. Mailander stated that his project continues. The contractor will be finished tomorrow and all the roads should be leveled with temporary patch. A start date for the cable pull work should be available next week. Once the temporary patch has settled, in about 60-90 days, paving can begin (around July/August). For the most part, two-way traffic has been maintained through the entire project.

NJ Transit’s Construction Project - Ms. Mailander stated that NJ Transit will be working on the final piece of the original train station ADA project, reroofing the historic kiosk, at no cost to the Village. The start has been delayed until later this week or next week and will last for approximately 6 weeks. The stair kiosk to and from the pedestrian underpass at the Ridgewood Train Station between East Ridgewood Avenue, Wesley Square, and West Ridgewood Avenue will be closed temporarily for repair work. This will require the blocking-off of some parking spaces on the east and west sides of the train tracks. The ramps to the south that serve the pedestrian underpass and the elevator located at the north end will remain open during this time. The closure is necessary to accommodate roof replacement restoration on the two, end point roof structures over the staircases that serve the pedestrian underpass. For safety reasons, the public was urged to follow directional signs and not to travel through barricaded areas.

Shred Day - Ms. Mailander reminded everyone that Shred Day will be held on Saturday, April 1^st from 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. rain or shine at the Recycling Center behind the Fire Headquarters. Shredding is free to all Ridgewood residents. Items may be placed in paper bags or cardboard boxes. Plastic bags are not accepted. Residents may watch their documents being shredded on camera, as they are securely shredded. Items accepted are cancelled checks, computer printouts, copy paper (all colors), and envelopes. Binders, plastics, overnight shipping envelopes, photos, carbon paper, or non-paper items are not accepted.

Mayor Knudsen thanked the PSE&G contact person, Rosalie Serapiglia, for her constant communication with the Village and keeping everyone informed with weekly updates. This was especially helpful for the businesses located in the CBD.

Mayor Knudsen also thanked Ms. Mailander and the Village Staff for their dedication during the recent snowstorm. She also thanked the residents for their cooperation.

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt, Ms. Mailander confirmed that all department heads will be present for questions at the March 27^th budget meeting.

7. COUNCIL REPORTS

Open Space Committee - Councilman Voigt reported that the Open Space Committee held a meeting on March 16^th. The members prepared an open space survey for use in updating the Master Plan. The survey will be sent out next week to 1,000 households selected at random for the purpose of gathering data on the residents’ use and future development of open space. Although the survey document will be mailed, residents are requested to complete the survey on-line. It is anticipated that 400+ replies will be received. The information will be used with any updates to the Open Space portion of the Master Plan.

Planning Board - Councilman Voigt reported that the Planning Board met on March 21^st. The Planning Board heard a traffic analysis presentation from KS Broad (the Ken Smith lot) on the corner of Broad Street and Franklin Avenue. Several issues were raised; one of which was how to handle the Franklin/Broad intersection and the dire need for updated traffic lights at that particular intersection.   The Planning Board is looking at timed and actuated traffic lights. Concerns were also expressed with the Franklin/Chestnut intersection as it relates to pedestrian traffic emanating from Chestnut Village and the KS Broad Development itself and how they get into town. A discussion was held on the potential need for an actuated traffic light on Franklin/Oak, as well. KS Broad will be summing up their presentation on April 18^th. A Planning Board vote on the site plan will be requested at that time.

Chestnut Village will be summing up their presentation on April 4^th and will be requesting a Planning Board vote on their site plan.

There are still some outstanding issues related to off-site improvements and the applicant’s fair share.

Library Board - Councilman Voigt stated that he attended an Authors Luncheon hosted by the Friends of the Library on March 15^th. He had the honor of sitting next to the author, Jamie Ford, who wrote “The Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet”.

Ridgewood Environmental Advisory Committee (REAC) - Councilman Sedon reported that REAC met on March 21^st. He reminded everyone that Earth Day will be held on April 23^rd in Van Neste Square Memorial Park from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. in conjunction with the Ridgewood Conservancy for Public Lands. Activities include vendor tables, information tables, a dog parade, and a daffodil festival.   As part of achieving her Girl Scout Gold Star Award, a young Ridgewood resident, Celeste Walsh, will have a table at Earth Day looking for volunteer opportunities.

On March 29^th, REAC and Ridgewood Water will be holding a discussion in the Senior Lounge in Village Hall at 7:00 p.m.

Shade Tree Commission - Councilman Sedon reported that the Shade Tree Commission met on March 21^st. Discussions included advertising the Adopt-A-Tree Program. There will be a Tree Protection Ordinance that will go before the Planning Board for comment and then come before the Village Council on April 5^th. This ordinance requires the replanting of one tree for every healthy tree removed. In early April, members of the Shade Tree Commission will be picking up five hundred small trees (whips) from the State. Many of these whips will be used to populate the future tree nursery that will be located behind the trucks at the Recycling Center. DEP approval has been received to construct a temporary fence.

Ridgewood Arts Council - Councilwoman Walsh stated that the Ridgewood Arts Council’s Augmented Reality will be held on April 23^rd. Flyers have been printed and will be distributed around town. Councilwoman Walsh described the project as being similar to Pokémon Go, which will use a downloaded app.

Field Committee - Councilman Hache stated there will be an RHS Alumni Event celebrating the 125^th Anniversary of Ridgewood High School on Friday, May 19^th with a rain date of May 20^th on Upper Vets Field. This is a community-wide event and all are welcome. There will be a DJ, auctioneer, food and adult refreshments. Space is limited. Tickets will go on sale in April and may be purchased online at rhsalumniassociation.org.

Approval has been received to use the Orchard School Field for the Holi Celebration on April 22^nd with a rain date of April 23^rd.  The Holi Celebration has a cultural significance among various Hindu traditions. It is a festive day to end conflicts, a day to forgive, and a day to forget. The day will include a ritual where people smear each other with colored paint and there is singing and dancing.

The Field Committee held a series of meetings regarding the Maple Field turf. Recently, this type of turf was found to be faulty. It did not hold up as represented and contained a hard surface that created a higher risk for concussion. The turf at Maple Field was installed 12 years ago and the warranty ran out 4 years ago. The manufacturer was contacted and the company came back with a proposal that significantly reduced the $600,000+ replacement cost.

The Field Committee will meet again on Tuesday, April 4^th at 7:30 p.m. at the Stable.

Parks Recreation and Conservation Board (PRC) - Councilman Hache reported that the next meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 28^th.

Councilman Hache stated that he had the honor and privilege of attending the funeral service for Marion Kortjohn, a longtime Ridgewood resident. Ms. Kortjohn passed away on March 12^th just three months’ shy of her 102^nd birthday. Ms. Kortjohn was a remarkable woman.

Mayor Knudsen complimented the organizers of the Library Author Luncheon for doing a wonderful job under adverse conditions, since the event was held the day after the snow storm. Mayor Knudsen enjoyed listening to and speaking with the author, Jamie Ford. She highly recommended his book, “The Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet”.

Fourth of July Committee - Mayor Knudsen reported that the Fourth of July Committee met last week. The theme this year is “Those Who Serve”, which includes anyone who serves the community, state or nation.   A grand marshal has been chosen and there will be a very special speaker during the morning Flag Raising at Wilsey Square.

Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) - Mayor Knudsen stated that HPC met last Thursday. The Office Bar and Grill will be getting a beautiful new facade and the details are currently being worked out.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she participated this morning in “Mayors for Meals”, sponsored by Community Meals, Inc., and Meals on Wheels. The mayors delivered meals to senior citizens who otherwise couldn’t get out. Working with Jack Egan, Mayor Knudsen delivered meals to residents of Ridgewood and Ho-Ho-Kus and enjoyed visiting with each client. Mayor Knudsen pointed out that funding for programs such as Meals on Wheels is down and that Community Meals, Inc. relies strictly on donations. If anyone wishes to donate either time or money, they can go to communitymealsinc.org for more information.

8. PUBLIC COMMENTS

Chris Reid, 112 Stanley Place, referred to documents obtained through the Open Public Records Act (OPRA) and read the following e-mailed response from Mr. DeMarco to a question from the then Village Manager Roberta Sonenfeld as follows: “The Pomander item is in the CSAC Minutes of March 17^th, April 21^st, and May 19^th. I will forward these minutes to you in a few minutes. I can fill you in more if needed. Councilman Sedon was at each of these meetings and many residents from Pomander and Sherman have attended different meetings. In the May 19^th minutes, reference is made to the background on Pomander which I provided. Briefly, the CSAC is interested in safety and operational issues addressed by Police, Engineering, and/or Council actions. Simply objecting to someone parking on your street or in front of your house does not qualify. The Pomander residents reported blocked driveway access and fender benders, operational issues with all-day parking related to snow removal and leaf collections, and U-turns by errant drivers both in driveways, mid-block and in the cul-de-sac, etc. The offer for more time-limit parking enforcement was not well received. The residents suggested the no parking rule and strongly supported its adoption despite understanding and acknowledging that the rule would also apply to service vehicles, visitors and residents. As I recall, Chris’ poll showed strong support for the ban including the long duration and the No U-turn Ordinance.”

Mr. Reid referred to a police report concerning accidents on Pomander Walk, which revealed that there was only one in the driveway of a resident and it did not involve any parking or vehicles on the street.

Mr. Reid referred to a document from Eileen Young of the Village Clerk’s Office in response to a request for information on whether or not there was a study done. Mr. Reid read from this document, as follows: “In response to your OPRA request regarding a Pomander Walk study, we have no documents to provide. There was no formal study performed. A survey was performed due to numerous concerns and as a result, upon advisement from the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee, an ordinance was enacted.” Mr. Reid stated that the CSAC did not necessarily recommend no parking; they referred that the residents of Pomander said, “we want no parking”.

Gail Conenello, 23 Garfield Place, thanked the Village Council for agreeing to put a proposal for one-side-of-the-street parking on Pomander Walk on its agenda for the next meeting. Ms. Conenello asked for consistency and compromise, noting that these considerations were made in discussions concerning a similar situation on Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road. Ms. Conenello did not feel the current parking restriction on Pomander Walk addressed issues such as snow removal or emergency vehicle access, since parking is only restricted for 12 hours per day. One-side-of-the-street parking or a two-hour parking restriction would address these issues.

Ms. Conenello stated that while she hoped the traffic study would resolve issues within the Village, especially in the area near George Washington Middle School, she did not feel the Village Council needed to wait for that study to allow some type of compromise to occur on Pomander Walk now.

Peter Quinn, 66 Pomander Walk, expressed his disappointment that the residents have not been able to come together and talk about this issue. He personally felt that the residents of Pomander Walk were being slandered. He agreed that the issue was a systemic issue that must be reviewed. Mr. Quinn pointed out that this is the third time the Village Council has brought this issue to a ote. Mr. Quinn stated that over the 5½ years that this issue has been discussed, the residents of Pomander Walk have suggested options that were unsuccessful, such as increasing police enforcement or asking business owners to prohibit their employees parking on Pomander Walk. Mr. Reid suggested that zoning changes in the CBD may be one solution.

Mr. Reid stated that both he and his children were almost hit by cars multiple times, but did not file a police report. He felt that the standardized form proposed by Mayor Knudsen may be appropriate in capturing information. He did not feel the Village Council should take action based only on information provided by neighboring residents and before a traffic study is conducted. Mr. Reid stated that he was not given the courtesy to review the information submitted by the nearby residents. He objected to the Village Council moving forward in reconsidering the no parking restriction on Pomander Walk without having looked at the systemic issue. The safety measures on Sherman Place should be allowed to take effect before any changes are made.

Mayor Knudsen pointed out that the information presented by the surrounding residents is considered a document that was provided for review by the Village Council; it is not considered as evidence. To her knowledge, there is nothing in the documents pertaining to anyone personally, nor would the Village Council tolerate this.

Councilman Voigt felt that many of the issues could be solved if residents from Pomander Walk and Sherman Place came together and just talked. He urged residents to start the process by just meeting over a cup of coffee.

Jane Remis, 118 Madison Place, felt that a traffic study would identify the best ways to keep the Village safe. Ms. Remis also approved of the standardized form suggested by Mayor Knudsen because it keeps safety at the forefront. She felt that the public notifications in place were sufficient and that it would be very difficult to determine parameters for additional notifications. Ms. Remis pointed out that it is common for people to only look for evidence that supports their position, unlike a police investigation. Ms. Remis suggested asking residents to fully research a concern before coming to a CSAC meeting, as this information may help them to understand situations better and would expedite the proceedings.

Melanie McWilliams, 431 Bogert Avenue, asked for an explanation of the actions being proposed by the Village Council concerning Bogert Avenue and Cambridge Road. Mayor Knudsen explained that the proposal is to restrict parking at all times for an additional 50’ beginning at the circular intersection for a distance, and restricting parking only during school drop-off and pick-up times from that point until the 500’ point delineated by Mr. Rutishauser. Ms. McWilliams urged the Village Councilmembers to visit the area and observe the safety hazards, particularly where her house and her neighbors house are located. Shrubbery and fencing located around the loop impede pedestrians from walking in this area. Since this shrubbery and fencing are permitted to stay because they are exempt under the grandfather clause, there is no other solution than to eliminate parking into the curbs to avoid what she described as a massive safety issue. Ms. McWilliams urged the Village Council to leave the ordinance as it stands or install sidewalks because there is no other safe alternative.

Alyson McCormack, 51 Sherman Place, felt it was amazing that the oneness is being placed on the residents of Sherman Place to speak directly with their neighbor when they were never considered before the ordinance was put into effect. The CSAC notes do not indicate a desire to compromise. Ms. McCormack stated that a meeting could only be held if the neighbors consider putting parking back on the street. She urged the Village Council to undo the ordinance.

Kathryn Schmidt, 123 South Irving Street, told the Village Council that she was happy that the parking issue was placed back on the agenda, especially the parking garage. Based on the meetings she has attended in the past, residents, commuters, and business people all agree that more parking spaces are needed.

In response to this evening’s presentation by Mr. Lahey, Ms. Schmidt stated that she agreed that the lack of parking effects the vibrancy and the reputation of the Village, which is very important. She questioned why the presentation didn’t take newer garage designs into consideration. Ms. Schmidt spoke of the importance of good communication between everyone on the Village Staff, Village Committees and Village Council to ensure that information like this is shared. She thanked the FAC for their hard work on the presentation.

Jim McCarthy, 153 Hope Street, referred to this evening’s closed session agenda item related to labor negotiations. He felt it was very difficult to manage labor relations and rates when all the contracts are staggered. A capped or reduced rate increase would be prevented structurally because none of the bargaining units want to go first. He urged the Village Council not to stagger related contracts, which will make them more equitable and increase accuracy with economic forecasts.

Concerning the parking garage, Mr. McCarthy didn’t understand why discussions were centering around a 350 space garage when a 250-270 space garage is under consideration. Mr. McCarthy stated that every parking space loses money, so the bigger the garage, the greater the absolute dollar deficit that needs to be funded from elsewhere. He stated that he was skeptical of the prospect of going up a level to accommodate retail, and that he wanted to see the smallest 270 space garage as possible. Mr. McCarthy stated that he was in favor of a parking garage; however, he urged caution in considering the garage to be guaranteed self-sustaining, when the possibility exists that it may not be in certain years. He thanked the Village Council for their work.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, commented on the parking garage presentation. He questioned the accuracy of the “executive summary” which indicated that the Ridgewood Parking Utility currently operates with a continual, annual surplus of approximately $500,000. He also questioned why the study was based on a 350 space garage, when a smaller garage is currently under consideration by the Village Council.   He expressed a concern that the FAC is not in sync with the Village Council or current information. Mr. Loving expressed a concern with the statement indicating that funding for the garage would be through new sources including extended hours and meaningful rate increase. He recalled that the last time the hours were extended, the restaurant community objected strenuously fearing they would lose customers who didn’t want to worry about feeding the meter during dinner. Other businesses would also be negatively affected with the parking hours beginning at 9:00 a.m. instead of 10:00 a.m.   Mr. Loving urged the Village Council to consider this issue very carefully. Mr. Loving disagreed with the proposal to add retail, noting the existence of vacant retail space and the competition this would create between the Village and private business owners. He preferred to have the area proposed for retail to be devoted to more parking spaces.

John Saraceno, 17 Coventry Court, felt that based on economics, this is not the time to consider adding retail as a way to support the parking garage. He felt it would be difficult for the Village to compete against private owners. He noted that the Village could remove themselves as landlords by selling units; however, he did not feel this would generate a lot of interest. He congratulated the FAC for trying to find ways to make the garage self-sustaining, but he didn’t feel this was achievable. Sometimes a community must build an infrastructure that is not self-sufficient but is considered an investment in the community. Mr. Saraceno also felt the retail and restaurant owners would object to the extension of hours. A decision must be reached based on many factors including financial support, size, and the needs and wants of the public.

9. RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

Deputy Village Clerk Donna Jackson read Resolution #17-83 to go into Closed Session as follows:

12. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilman Hache, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Work Session was adjourned at 11:44 p.m.

_____________________________

                                                                                                                     Susan Knudsen      

                                                                                                                           Mayor

_____________________________

            Donna M. Jackson

        Deputy Village Clerk

A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY ON MARCH 1, 2017 AT 7:30 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 7:49 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call, the following were present: Councilmembers  Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen. Also present were Heather Mailander, Acting Village Manager; Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney; and Donna M. Jackson, Deputy Village Clerk.  

2. RESOLUTIONS

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 17-56 THROUGH 17-65 WERE ADOPTED BY A CONSENT AGENDA, WITH ONE VOTE BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, AND WERE READ BY TITLE ONLY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION, NUMBERED 17-66, WAS CONSIDERED SEPARATELY AND READ IN FULL:

Prior to the adoption of Resolution #17-66, Mayor Knudsen thanked Acting Village Manager, Heather Mailander, for stepping into the role of Acting Village Manager for the third time. Mayor Knudsen conveyed the Village Council’s appreciation for her dedication, commitment, and service to the Village of Ridgewood.

Mayor Knudsen stated that Ms. Mailander has shown a level of professionalism and dedication. She has been responsive to the Village residents, and the Village Council is grateful every day for Ms. Mailander’s guidance and direction during her 28 years as a Ridgewood employee.

Mayor Knudsen announced that the new Village Manager is Heather Mailander. There was a round of applause.

Mayor Knudsen expressed her appreciation for Ms. Mailander’s service and commitment to the Village of Ridgewood. The Village Council couldn’t be more thrilled and honored that Ms. Mailander has accepted the role of Village Manager.

Councilman Voigt echoed the Mayor’s comments and said that he was looking forward to working with Ms. Mailander.

Councilman Sedon described Ms. Mailander as courteous, professional, extremely helpful, and a pleasure to work with over the years. He expressed his excitement about working with Ms. Mailander.

Councilwoman Walsh stated that Ms. Mailander serves the Village of Ridgewood with distinction and spoke about how fortunate the Village Council is to be working with her. She stated that the Village of Ridgewood is going to have a great Village Manager.

Councilman Hache stated that he has a great deal of appreciation for the wealth of knowledge that Ms. Mailander brings to the Village Council. He described Ms. Mailander’s ability to handle both the rolls of Village Clerk and Acting Village Manager as tremendous and a representation of her dedication and hard work on behalf of the Village. Councilman Hache stated that he was looking forward to working with Ms. Mailander.

Village Attorney, Matthew Rogers, stated that over the 10 years he has worked with Ms. Mailander he has observed her 24/7 dedication to the Village of Ridgewood. Mr. Rogers stated that he has never seen anyone more dedicated to doing things right for Ridgewood with the best interests of Ridgewood in mind, whether as Village Clerk or Acting Village Manager. Ms. Mailander also helps others to serve Ridgewood the best way they can. Mr. Rogers stated that he was very happy with the appointment of Ms. Mailander as Village Manager.

Councilwoman Walsh made a motion to accept Resolution 17-66. Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

Village Manager, Heather Mailander, thanked her family for all their support and encouragement. She said that she was very humbled and thankful that the Village Council has chosen her for the position of Village Manager. There is much work ahead, as well as many challenges to face; however, together, it can be done. Ms. Mailander stated that even though she resides outside of Ridgewood, she considers Ridgewood to be her home. Ms. Mailander expressed her love for the Village and thanked everyone for their support. Ms. Mailander also thanked the staff from both the Village Clerk’s Office and the Village Manager’s Office, as well as those who mentored her throughout her career. She expressed her excitement over being the Village Manager.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilwoman Walsh, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Special Public Meeting was adjourned at 8:02 p.m.

_____________________________

                                                                                                                     Susan Knudsen      

                                                                                                                           Mayor

_____________________________

            Donna M. Jackson

        Deputy Village Clerk

A REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD HELD IN THE SYDNEY V. STOLDT, JR. COURT ROOM OF THE RIDGEWOOD VILLAGE HALL, 131 NORTH MAPLE AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 12, 2017 AT 8:00 P.M.

1. CALL TO ORDER – OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT – ROLL CALL – FLAG SALUTE - MOMENT OF SILENCE

Mayor Knudsen called the meeting to order at 8:01 P.M. and read the Statement of Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act. At roll call, the following were present: Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen. Also present were Heather Mailander, Village Manager/Village Clerk and Matthew Rogers, Village Attorney.

Mayor Knudsen led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and held a Moment of Silence for all the men and women serving our nation and all first responders.

2. ACCEPTANCE OF FINANCIAL REPORTS

Mayor Knudsen moved that the Bills, Claims, and Vouchers, and Statement of Funds on Hand, as of June 30, 2017, be accepted as submitted. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

 

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

Mayor Knudsen moved that the Village Council minutes of March 9, March 27, and April 12, 2017 having been reviewed by the Village Council and now available in the Village Clerk’s Office, be approved as submitted. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

 

4. PROCLAMATIONS

None

 

 

 

 

 

5. SWEARING-IN OF POLICE SERGEANT SALVATORE D’AMICO

Sergeant Salvatore D’Amico was sworn in as a Police Sergeant by Mayor Knudsen while his wife held the Bible and his parents looked on. There was a round of applause and congratulations from everyone in attendance.

6. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Knudsen asked if there were any comments from the public.

Robert DeLorenzo, 16 Griswold Place, Glen Rock, New Jersey, explained that even though his wife, an employee of a store in Ridgewood, has a Central Business District Employee Parking Permit and she parks in the employee lot. He stated that she has received three parking tickets erroneously. The vehicles are registered in Mr. DeLorenzo’s name. The tickets were either placed on the windshield or mailed. One ticket was not received by Mr. DeLorenzo, and he subsequently received a Failure to Appear Notice. That notice came a day before the family left on vacation. If Mr. DeLorenzo hadn’t responded, his license would have been suspended. It appears that the application used by the Parking Official does not always work properly. This situation is time consuming, since Mr. DeLorenzo and his wife must appear in Court to have the tickets dismissed. It costs them money; it costs the Village money, and it affects Mr. DeLorenzo’s employment, because as a government employee, a license suspension could cost him his job.

Mr. DeLorenzo stated that he has spoken to Mayor Knudsen and offered his help, as an IT professional, to help solve this problem and to find a way to have these errors administratively dismissed.

Mr. DeLorenzo will e-mail copies of the ParkMobile paid stubs to Mayor Knudsen and Ms. Mailander. Mayor Knudsen stated that this documentation will be reviewed.

Mr. DeLorenzo inquired about the measures being taken to help alleviate the parking problems in the Central Business District (CBD). He stated that the lack of parking is hurting businesses and that his wife is uncomfortable walking to the employee lot in the dark, because it is a distance away from the CBD.

Sheila Brogan, 302 Kensington Drive, appeared as the Co-Chairperson for Age Friendly Ridgewood. She spoke on behalf of herself and Beth Abbott, who could not attend tonight’s meeting. Ms. Brogan thanked the Village Council for their support and interest in Age Friendly Ridgewood, and she reported on the following activities of this group:

• On June 19^th, Age Friendly Ridgewood hosted a walkability study of the CBD and Franklin Avenue, performed by the New Jersey Department of Transportation and their consultants. Ms. Brogan thanked Councilman Sedon for being an active participant in this study.
• This summer, Age Friendly Ridgewood will be paying for Graydon Pool passes for Ridgewood residents, 62 years of age and older, who are eligible for food stamps, Medicaid or PAAD. Flyers have been prepared, and the group will make every effort to let senior citizens know about this opportunity. This initiative grew out of the senior citizens’ picnic held at Graydon Pool in late June, and the response was positive. Ms. Brogan thanked Mayor Knudsen and Councilman Voigt for taking the time to join the senior citizens at Graydon Pool for the picnic.
• In an effort to open up opportunities and experiences in Ridgewood, Age Friendly Ridgewood is working with Janet Fricke, Assistant to the Village Manager, to extend the senior bus service for senior citizens who would like to attend the Tuesday evening concert series at the Kasschau Memorial Shell. Senior citizens interested in riding the bus to the Kasschau Memorial Shell will be provided with a chair and bug spray, so they can enjoy the evening in comfort.
• The Ridgewood New Players Association is offering senior citizens a discount of $5.00 on the ticket price for the summer, New Players’ shows at Ridgewood High School. Age Friendly Ridgewood will support the cost of an additional day for the senior citizens’ bus service, starting after Labor Day. The plans for this extra day for the bus are being finalized and the details will be announced soon.
• Age Friendly Ridgewood is aware that some residents who receive food stamps and have a low income, have difficulty buying paper goods, personal grooming products, and cleaning supplies, since food stamps cannot be used to purchase such items. Last month, Age Friendly Ridgewood placed a bin at the Ridgewood Library to collect these items. The bin was full when it was picked up. The bin has been moved to Graydon Pool for the month of July. In August, the bin will be moved to the Lester Stable. In September, the bin is tentatively scheduled to be in Ridgewood High School. In October, the bin will be in Christ Church. These items will be donated to Social Service Association, Ridgecrest Senior Housing, SHARE House and the Neighborhood Assistance Program.
• In the spring, Age Friendly Ridgewood launched their website, agefriendlyridgewood.org. The website lists organizations and programs related to housing, transportation, health services and community services for senior citizens.

Ms. Brogan described Ridgewood as a wonderful community and a great place to grow up and to grow old.

Mayor Knudsen thanked Ms. Brogan and Ms. Abbott for all of their work and their generous support of Graydon Senior Days.

Ann Marie Agnello, 31 Clinton Avenue, stated that she was not opposed to changing the hours when Clinton Avenue is open; however, she was opposed to the language in the amended ordinance where it states “closed street” as opposed to “no through traffic”. The term “no through traffic”, allowed those servicing homes or visiting family and friends to be able to come and go, the same as the residents.   This did not present a problem because this did not happen often. A “closed street” requires nonresidents to demonstrate or document a need to access a residence. Ms. Agnello spoke of the hardship associated with restricting the hours a health care professional can visit a residence, which she described as an unnecessary burden for a family. At a Citizens Safety Advisory Committee meeting, Ms. Agnello was told that Access Link could not access a residence when a street is closed. Access Link is a critical service to residents. Ms. Agnello suggested that restricting the access of disability-related services may go against the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Ms. Agnello stated that Clinton Avenue has not experienced safety issues under the present ordinance and she urged the Village Council to change the wording of the ordinance from “closed street” to “no through traffic”.  

Michelle Katzman, 35 Clinton Avenue, stated her appreciation that, at the last Citizens Safety Advisory Committee meeting, everyone’s comments about opening up Clinton Avenue for most of the day, were heard and all the points were made to ensure safety first. Ms. Katzman felt this was a solution in search of a problem. She felt that prohibiting cars on Clinton Avenue was still the safest plan, noting that this is supported by statistics. Clinton Avenue is unique, and as a street closed to cars on school days, it acts as a sidewalk, making it a complete street. Ms. Katzman noted that South Murray Avenue is open to anyone who chooses to use it.

Ms. Katzman also noted that opening Clinton Avenue during school hours will provide more parking. At the last Citizens Safety Advisory Committee meeting, she heard Sheila Brogan say that, currently, schools do not have enough on-site parking and the ten to fifteen-minute congestion at drop-off and pick-up times occurs at all of the Ridgewood Schools. Ms. Katzman felt that this will be less of an issue with the implementation of the new traffic plan. Ms. Katzman stated that, in the 24 years she has lived on Clinton Avenue, she has never experienced a safety issue. She urged the Village Council to settle this issue once and for all.

Jane Remis, 118 Madison Place, presented photographs of Clinton Avenue to the Village Council. Ms. Remis did not feel the intention of the amended ordinance was to restrict services such as health service providers or Access Link. She questioned how to define and enforce the “need” to access a residence.

Denise Lima, 319 East Glen Avenue, stated that truck drivers patronizing the Starbucks located on Route 17, are parking along the highway, creating a dangerous situation for vehicles coming off the ramp and entering the site. She suggested posting a “No Parking/No Standing” sign.

Ms. Lima commented on Ordinance 3605. She stated that she understood the purpose of the ordinance is to minimize indiscriminate removal and cutting of trees upon lots, to avoid increased storm water runoff, soil erosion, and decreased groundwater recharge to the groundwater aquifer- supplied potable water system. Ms. Lima questioned how a tree’s location would be identified, considering that a tree, because of its size and age, may not fit perfectly in one lot and block. She asked for a description/definition of the procedure that will be used when a tree is bordering property lines. Ms. Lima also questioned the replacement tree requirement, as it relates to erosion, if a tree cannot be replaced on-site. Planting a tree in another section of the Village will not help to avoid an increase in storm water runoff on the original property. Ms. Lima noted that the ordinance calls for any replacement tree to have a minimum 1.75 inch diameter at breast height (DBH); however, there is no mention about a minimum height. A tree canopy from a 100-foot tree should not be replaced by a six-foot tree with a minimum 1.75 inch DBH. She asked to see a minimum height standard added to the ordinance.

There being no other comments from the public, Mayor Knudsen closed the public portion of the meeting.

7. MANAGER’S REPORT

Family Events in and Surrounding Ridgewood - Ms. Mailander listed the following family events in and around Ridgewood for families:

• On July 14, 2017, the Disney movie, “Moana” will be shown on the beach at Graydon Pool with admission beginning at 7:00 p.m. and the movie beginning at sundown. This is open to all Ridgewood residents at a cost of $5.00 per person. Any Ridgewood day campers may get in for free, as long as they are wearing their Ridgewood Day Camp Shirt.
• Bergen County is sponsoring movies in different County parks, including Van Saun Park in Paramus, Darlington Lake in Mahwah, and Riverside Park in North Arlington. These movies are free and begin at approximately 8:30 p.m. The movie “Pete’s Dragon” will be shown on July 14^th at Van Saun Park, and the movie “Jaws” will be shown on July 19^th at Darlington Lake. Additional information can be found on the Village’s website.
• Graydon Pool registration is still open. Graydon Pool offers a beach area, a kiddie pool, areas of shade, a ramp to get into the deeper water for those with mobility challenges, a volleyball net, a playground area, and the Water’s Edge Café, which serves snacks and drinks.
• The Kasschau Memorial Shell has entertainment every Tuesday and Thursday at 8:30 p.m. The performances are free and open to the public. On Thursday, July 13^th, “Bucky Pizzarelli and Friends” will perform. On Tuesday, July 18^th, the “McVey Family” will perform various Broadway songs.
• The Ridgewood Guild sponsors “Music in the Night” and “Art in the Park” every Friday evening through September 1, 2017.   These programs provide various types of music throughout the Central Business District (CBD) and artwork for sale at Memorial Park at Van Neste Square, benefiting the Ridgewood Guild.
• Walking through the CBD, families can enjoy the flowers and plantings provided by The Ridgewood Conservancy for Public Land.
• Enjoy breakfast, lunch, dinner or dessert in the CBD, after shopping at local merchants.

Estate Card - Ms. Mailander reported that the Estate Card will be available to Ridgewood taxpayers in late August. This card is a debit card. By shopping and dining locally, various local merchants and restaurants will give reward points. The reward points will accumulate and once per year, the rewards points will be used to reduce the taxpayer’s property tax bill. A letter from Mayor Knudsen containing information about the Estate Card will be included with the tax bills, which will be mailed out in late August.

Paving - Ms. Mailander stated that paving within the Village continues with two contractors working. Morningside Road has been completed. The drainage work on Bogert Road is continuing and, once this is completed, the road will be resurfaced. Paving will continue through the fall.

Ridgewood Water - Ms. Mailander noted that Ridgewood Water is working daily on Linwood Avenue, reconnecting pipe crossings in the brook. This is one of four locations that this type of work will be done over the next few months.

Age Friendly Ridgewood - Ms. Mailander thanked Age Friendly Ridgewood for their offer to fund the purchase of Graydon Pool badges and the additional day for the senior bus in the fall. Applications for Graydon Pool badges are available at the Lester Stable.

E-Notices - Ms. Mailander reminded everyone to sign-up for E-Notices. E-Notices will enhance communication to residents by updating dangerous weather conditions, traffic issues, and sanitation and recycling pick-up schedules. Messages are sent via e-mail and text to electronic devices. Residents may sign-up for E-Notices on the Village website by clicking on the “SwiftReach” logo.

8. VILLAGE COUNCIL REPORTS

Shade Tree Commission - Councilman Sedon reported that the last Shade Tree Commission meeting was held on July 11, 2017. The Shade Tree Commission met the new Parks and Recreation Supervisor, Daniel Cramblitt, and found him to be excited, energetic, and happy to be in Ridgewood. A discussion was held on the Capital Budget Tree Replacement Program, with the goal being the planting of $55,000 worth of trees this year. Councilman Sedon explained that trees are being planted in Ridgewood in specific areas, as delineated on the Ridgewood Recycling Map. Last year, approximately $8,500 worth of trees were planted in Section “A” and between $8,000 and $9,000 worth of trees were planted in Section “B”.   This year, $20,000 worth of trees will be planted in Section “C” and $20,000 worth of trees will be planted in Section “D”. Then, with the regular line item budget, planting will begin again in Sections “A” and “B”. The remaining $15,000 will be used toward remediating the tree wells in the Central Business District (CBD). There is a Shade Tree Commission Sub-Committee that will look specifically at ideas, designs, and soil adjustments for the tree wells.

Ridgewood Arts Council (RAC) - Councilwoman Walsh stated that the RAC met on July 11, 2017 and conducted their reorganization meeting. Audrey Fink will continue as the Chairperson. Rosie McCooe and Dana Glazer will be Vice Co-Chairpersons. The next “Artist’s Talk” will be on July 29, 2017, starting at 11:00 a.m., and will feature graphic artist Ashley Zielinski, who will be conducting a 3D Printing Workshop. The suggested ages for this workshop are middle school age and above. The next “Artist’s Talk” will be held on August 17, 2017, and is entitled, “Art of the Editorial Illustration”, featuring Drew Martin and Michael Thompson.

Historic Preservation Commission - Mayor Knudsen reported that the Historic Preservation Commission will be meeting on July 13, 2017 at 8:00 p.m. in the Village Hall Garden Room.

Planning Board - Mayor Knudsen reported that the Planning Board will be meeting on Tuesday, July 18, 2017. The agenda includes The Enclave application, located on North Maple Avenue. Mayor Knudsen asked everyone to check the Planning Board’s agenda, on the Village website, to confirm that this application will be heard.

9. ORDINANCES - RIDGEWOOD WATER
10. INTRODUCTION - #3606 - Water Capital Ordinance ($1,600,000) - Purchase of Elks Club Property

Mayor Knudsen moved the first reading of Ordinance 3606. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3606 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $1,600,000 FROM THE WATER UTILITY             CAPITAL FUND FOR THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY IN AND BY THE         VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, NEW JERSEY

Councilman Hache moved that Ordinance 3606 be adopted on first reading and that August 9, 2017 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: Councilmembers Voigt and Walsh

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. PUBLIC HEARING

None

10. RESOLUTIONS - RIDGEWOOD WATER

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 17-197 THROUGH 17-200, WERE ADOPTED BY A CONSENT AGENDA WITH ONE VOTE BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, AND WERE READ BY TITLE ONLY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION, NUMBERED 17-201, WAS CONSIDERED SEPARATELY AND WAS READ IN FULL BY THE VILLAGE MANAGER/VILLAGE CLERK:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11. ORDINANCES

1. INTRODUCTION - #3607 - Blue Collar Union Salary Ordinance

Mayor Knudsen moved the first reading of Ordinance 3607. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3607 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO FIX SALARIES, WAGES, AND OTHER COMPENSATION,        OF AND FOR BLUE COLLAR EMPLOYEES OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD,      COUNTY OF BERGEN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Councilman Sedon moved that Ordinance 3607 be adopted on first reading and that August 9, 2017 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. INTRODUCTION - #3608 - White Collar Union Salary Ordinance

Mayor Knudsen moved the first reading of Ordinance 3608. Councilman Hache seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3608 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO FIX SALARIES, WAGES, AND OTHER COMPENSATION,        OF AND FOR THE WHITE COLLAR EMPLOYEES OF THE VILLAGE OF         RIDGEWOOD, COUNTY OF BERGEN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Councilman Voigt moved that Ordinance 3608 be adopted on first reading and that August 9, 2017 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Hache seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. INTRODUCTION - #3609 - Amend Chapter 145 - Fees - Establish Fees for Tree Protection

Mayor Knudsen moved the first reading of Ordinance 3609. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3609 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 145 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE         OF RIDGEWOOD, FEES, AT SECTION 145-6, “ENUMERATION OF FEES             RELATING TO CODE CHAPTERS”

Councilman Sedon moved that Ordinance 3609 be amended to reflect the cost of the replacement tree to be $125. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion to amend the ordinance.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: Councilman Voigt

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

Councilman Hache moved that Ordinance 3609 be adopted, as amended, on first reading and that August 9, 2017 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: Councilman Voigt

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. INTRODUCTION - #3610 - Amend Chapter 265 - Vehicles and Traffic - No Stopping on Portion of West Ridgewood Avenue

Mayor Knudsen moved the first reading of Ordinance 3610. Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3610 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE         OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-66, “NO STOPPING OR STANDING”

Councilwoman Walsh moved that Ordinance 3610 be adopted on first reading and that August 9, 2017 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. INTRODUCTION - #3611 - Enact Title 39 on All Public School Properties

Mayor Knudsen moved the first reading of Ordinance 3611. Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3611 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE PROVISIONS OF N.J.S.A. 39:5A-1 TO BE      APPLICABLE TO ALL OF THE PREMISES AND PROPERTY OWNED AND           OPERATED BY THE RIDGEWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, SUBJECT TO THE         APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION OF THE STATE            OF NEW JERSEY

Councilman Hache moved that Ordinance 3611 be adopted on first reading and that August 9, 2017 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. INTRODUCTION - #3612 - Unlawful Enrollment of Students in Ridgewood Public Schools

Mayor Knudsen moved the first reading of Ordinance 3612. Councilman Hache seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3612 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO PREVENT THE UNLAWFUL ENROLLMENT OF SCHOOL        CHILDREN IN THE RIDGEWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM AND TO PROVIDE      PENALTIES THEREFORE

Councilman Sedon moved that Ordinance 3612 be adopted on first reading and that August 9, 2017 be fixed as the date for the hearing thereon. Councilman Hache seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3601 - Amend Chapter 265 - Vehicles and Traffic - Establish Stop Signs at Upper Boulevard and Glenwood Road

Mayor Knudsen moved the second reading of Ordinance 3601 by title on second reading and that the public hearing thereon be opened. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3601 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE         OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-59, SCHEDULE IX, “STOP INTERSECTIONS”

Mayor Knudsen announced that the Public Hearing was open. There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Knudsen moved that the Public Hearing be closed. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

Councilman Voigt moved that Ordinance 3601 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3602 - Amend Chapter 222 - Power Tools, Landscaping, and Yard Maintenance Equipment

Mayor Knudsen moved the second reading of Ordinance 3602 by title on second reading and that the public hearing thereon be opened. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3602 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 222 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE         OF RIDGEWOOD, “POWER TOOLS, LANDSCAPING AND YARD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT” AT SECTION 222-1, “COMMERCIAL USE”

Mayor Knudsen announced that the Public Hearing was open. There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Knudsen moved that the Public Hearing be closed. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

Councilman Hache moved that Ordinance 3602 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3603 - Authorize Special Emergency Appropriation - Master Plan Revision ($250,000)

Mayor Knudsen moved the second reading of Ordinance 3603 by title on second reading and that the public hearing thereon be opened. Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3603 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL EMERGENCY APPROPRIATION         PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 40A:4-53 FOR THE PREPARATION AND EXECUTION             OF A MASTER PLAN REVISION IN THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD

Mayor Knudsen announced that the Public Hearing was open. There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Knudsen moved that the Public Hearing be closed. Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

Councilman Hache moved that Ordinance 3603 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law. Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3604 - Amend Chapter 265 - Vehicles and Traffic - Hours for Closure of Clinton Avenue to Through Traffic

Mayor Knudsen moved the second reading of Ordinance 3604 by title on second reading and that the public hearing thereon be opened. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3604 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 265 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE         OF RIDGEWOOD, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, AT SECTION 265-64, SCHEDULE XIV, “STREETS CLOSED TO TRAFFIC”

Mayor Knudsen announced that the Public Hearing was open. There were no comments from the public, and Mayor Knudsen moved that the Public Hearing be closed. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

Councilman Hache moved that Ordinance 3604 be adopted on second reading and final publication as required by law. Councilwoman Walsh seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: Councilman Voigt

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

1. PUBLIC HEARING - #3605 - Amend Chapter 260 - Trees and Shrubs

Mayor Knudsen moved the second reading of Ordinance 3605 by title on second reading and that the public hearing thereon be opened. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

The Village Clerk read Ordinance 3605 by title:

            AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 260 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE         OF RIDGEWOOD, TREES AND SHRUBS

Mayor Knudsen announced that the Public Hearing was open.

Denise Lima, 319 East Glen Avenue, wanted confirmation that the purpose of Ordinance 3605 was to preserve existing trees. She expressed concerns that builders would be willing to pay the $125 per tree fee to allow them to cut down as many trees as they wish. She felt that, in order to discourage this, the fee needed to be increased.

Councilman Sedon explained that the purpose of Ordinance 3605 is to help maintain soil erosion and also to preserve tree canopies. The Village loses over 200 trees per year as a result of the sidewalk replacement program and storms, and this ordinance will help replenish trees throughout the Village.

Ms. Lima stated that Ordinance 3605 did not contain a required height for replacement trees. Councilman Sedon explained that the industry standard is to measure the trees diameter at 4.5 feet from the ground (DBH). Any replacement tree proposed must have a minimum DBH of 1.75 inches.

Ms. Lima felt that the language contained within the ordinance describing trees that are dead, damaged, or a threat to the safety of others, was well-written. However, she felt that the wording concerning the removal of trees, especially considering the current practices of knocking down older homes to build larger homes, was not clear or strong enough. Removal of trees that border property lines would affect residents other than the lot owner. Ms. Lima questioned whether the decision of the removal of a tree rests only with the property owner. She suggested having a committee make this decision, especially if the tree is bordering other properties. Village Attorney Matthew Rogers explained that the property owner makes the decision to remove a tree. Ms. Lima felt that the ordinance should clarify who makes the decision to remove a tree when it borders more than one property line.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, expressed a concern that Ordinance 3605 does not require the posting of a tree removal permit. He felt that language should be added to the ordinance requiring that a permit be prominently posted, so that residents and enforcement authorities can easily tell that a permit was issued.

There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Knudsen moved that the Public Hearing be closed. Councilman Sedon seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

Councilman Sedon moved that the vote on Ordinance 3605 be carried to the August 9, 2017 Public Meeting. Councilman Voigt seconded the motion.

Roll Call Vote

AYES:             Councilmembers Hache, Sedon, Voigt, Walsh, and Mayor Knudsen

NAYS: None

ABSENT:        None

ABSTAIN:       None

 

 

 

12. RESOLUTIONS

 

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, NUMBERED 17-202 THROUGH 17-222, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF 17-215, WHICH HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA, WERE ADOPTED BY A CONSENT AGENDA WITH ONE VOTE BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, AND WERE READ BY TITLE ONLY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION, NUMBERED 17-215, WAS CONSIDERED SEPARATELY AND WAS READ IN FULL BY THE VILLAGE MANAGER/VILLAGE CLERK:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Under questioning by Councilman Voigt regarding Resolution #17-215, Mayor Knudsen explained that the Schedler Ad Hoc Committee was discussed several times both in Public Session and in Closed Session, and there were a variety of e-mails that came in from residents. Councilman Hache recommended Michael Winograd and Matthew Cunningham. Other residents made inquiries, and the Village Manager recommended representatives from Parks and Recreation and Engineering. Councilman Voigt felt there should also be a representative from the Open Space Committee on the Schedler Ad Hoc Committee. He recommended Ralph Currey.

Mayor Knudsen recommended approving the resolution as it is written now, and then determining if there are any other interested people whose names could be added in the near future. Mayor Knudsen pointed out that the number of residents who expressed an interest in being appointed to the Schedler Ad Hoc Committee had to be significantly narrowed in order not to have too big a committee.

Councilman Hache agreed with Mayor Knudsen to approve the resolution as it is written now, since, to date, no members of the Open Space Committee expressed an interest in being appointed to the Schedler Ad Hoc Committee. If this occurs, the name could be added next month. Councilman Sedon and Councilman Voigt agreed.

 

13. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mayor Knudsen asked if there were any comments from the public.

Rurik Halaby, 374 Evergreen Place, presented Mayor Knudsen and the Village Councilmembers with a book entitled, “The Death of Common Sense”. Mr. Halaby stated that the ordinances that are passed by the Village Council tax his logic. Referring to Ordinance 3609, Mr. Halaby stated his objection to residents being required to obtain and post a permit to cut down trees on their own property, in order to minimize tree removal. Mr. Halaby felt the Village should be properly maintaining existing trees.   Referring to Ordinance 3596, which allowed parking in certain areas and during specific times on Bogert Avenue, Mr. Halaby suggested that the request for parking restrictions along Bogert Avenue was made by a friend of Mayor Knudsen. He felt that children who are old enough to walk to school are old enough to navigate around parked cars. Mr. Halaby felt the bigger danger comes from large, moving vehicles such as SUV’s. Mr. Halaby felt the Citizens Safety Advisory Committee should be doing more to acquire better traffic signals and more stop signs to slow traffic down. Mr. Halaby felt that instead of passing one ordinance after another, the Village should concentrate on doing the right things.

Mayor Knudsen stated that she took great exception with the suggestion that an ordinance, which was put in place for the safety of children walking along Bogert Avenue, was enacted because it was requested from a friend of hers. Mayor Knudsen said that this kind of manipulation of the facts needs to stop.

Jane Remis, 118 Madison Place, pointed out that children under the age of 10 are not safe walking in any kind of traffic alone. Ms. Remis thanked the Village Council for passing Ordinance 3604, which closes Clinton Avenue to through traffic only during certain hours. She hoped it will be used as a tool to get vehicles off the road during those hours.

Boyd Loving, 342 South Irving Street, asked for clarification on Resolution #17-211, Title 59 Approval, Paint Curbs Yellow. He understood this would be done throughout the Village, not just on specific street corners. Councilwoman Walsh and Mayor Knudsen also understood that it would be done throughout the Village, as well. Mayor Knudsen felt Resolution #17-211 was a good starting point, and would give the Village an idea of how well it works once it is implemented. Ms. Mailander explained that after these specific street corners are painted, and public reaction is received, another resolution will follow for painting curbs yellow throughout the entire Village.

Mr. Loving stated that the walkway leading from the James Ten Hove Plaza up to the sidewalk on Maple Avenue is not lit in the evening. He stated his concern with people tripping and falling, and the possibility of litigation. Ms. Mailander stated that the trees have been pruned in the area and a request has been made to PSE&G to install a pole light. Ms. Mailander stated that she will contact PSE&G to see if this installation can be expedited. Mr. Loving asked for ground lighting. Ms. Mailander stated that this would be very expensive. The pole light will be tried first, especially since there is not a lot of ground available where lighting could be placed. If lighting from the pole does not work, other options will be considered.

15. RESOLUTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION

Ms. Mailander read Resolution #17-223 to go into Closed Session as follows:

16. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the Village Council, on a motion by Councilman Sedon, seconded by Councilman Voigt, and carried unanimously by voice vote, the Village Council’s Regular Public Meeting was adjourned at 9:24 p.m.

                                                                                    _____________________________

                                                                                                Susan Knudsen      

                                                                                                       Mayor

_______________________________

            Heather A. Mailander

                 Village Clerk